7B Answer
7B Answer
7B Answer
Dr. M. Medraj Mech. Eng. Dept. - Concordia University MECH 321 lecture 9/1 Dr. M. Medraj Mech. Eng. Dept. - Concordia University MECH 321 lecture 9/2
z
z z
τ
σ
FIGURE 8.9 The three modes of crack surface displacement. (a) Mode I, opening or
τ τ
tensile mode; (b) mode II, sliding mode; and (c) mode III, tearing mode.
crack surfaces slide over one another in a direction σ and cracks often propagate under so called mixed modes, which are the
a)
perpendicular to the leading edge of the crack.
b) c)
……………. of the above mentioned modes, such as I-II, I-III, II-III and
so on.
Mode III is tearing and antiplane shear mode
where the crack surfaces move relative to one • In practice, however, crack propagation under ………… is the most
another and parallel to the leading edge of the dangerous. Under Mode I, it is easier for crack propagation to trigger a
crack. brittle fracture, so it has been studied extensively.
Dr. M. Medraj Mech. Eng. Dept. - Concordia University MECH 321 lecture 9/3 Dr. M. Medraj Mech. Eng. Dept. - Concordia University MECH 321 lecture 9/4
Stress Analysis of Cracks Fracture Toughness
• when the plate is thin, plane stress exists, i.e. σz=0
• in mode I, the stresses acting on the • when the plate is thick, σz=ν(σx+ σy) and a state of plane strain exists, εz= 0
crack as a function of radial
• stress intensity factor is related to the applied stress and crack length by:
distance r and angle θ are:
σ x =
K
2π r
fx (θ ) K = Yσ πa
K Where,
σ y = fy (θ )
2π r Y is a function of the crack and
K specimen size and geometry
τ xy = f xy (θ )
2π r (dimensionless parameter)
θ θ 3θ
f x (θ ) = cos 1 − sin sin
units of K are MPa m½
• K is the …....……………. factor and 2 2 2
Thicker, more rigid pieces of a give material
defines the stress around a crack or θ θ 3θ
f y (θ ) = cos 1 + sin sin have a ……… fracture toughness than thin ones.
2 2 2
flaw (similar to but NOT the same as
θ θ 3θ
the stress concentration factor Kt ) f xy (θ ) = sin cos cos
2 2 2 What is the difference between plane stress or plane strain conditions?
Dr. M. Medraj Mech. Eng. Dept. - Concordia University MECH 321 lecture 9/5 Dr. M. Medraj Mech. Eng. Dept. - Concordia University MECH 321 lecture 9/6
W πa
Y (a / W ) = tan
πa W
Dr. M. Medraj Mech. Eng. Dept. - Concordia University MECH 321 lecture 9/9 Dr. M. Medraj Mech. Eng. Dept. - Concordia University MECH 321 lecture 9/10
K Ic = Y σ π a K Ic
σc ≤
pronounced as “kay-…....-see” Y πa
minimum value → safer for design
Dr. M. Medraj Mech. Eng. Dept. - Concordia University MECH 321 lecture 9/11 Dr. M. Medraj Mech. Eng. Dept. - Concordia University MECH 321 lecture 9/12
Summary Design using Fracture Mechanics
¾ Stress intensity factor, K, describes the stress intensity felt by that material
under a particular loading condition, so if load varies, or specimen shape
varies etc., then K will vary K Ic = Yσ πa
- in a similar way that the stress on a component can vary This is the allowable
Material Property: so flaw size or smallest
¾ When the stress intensity in a brittle material reaches a particular value, KIc
can select material with flaw that can be detected
then something happens - i.e. ………. fracture occurs
appropriate value of KIc This could be design
- in a similar way to yield strength being the stress when a material stress (including safety
starts plastically deforming factor) or applied stress
¾Tests are used to measure KIc using Mode I crack opening and calculating 9 During design, we have to decide which parameters are constrained
the Y scale parameter. by the application and which can be controlled by design.
¾ KIc is a fundamental material property that is affected by: 9 For example, KIc may be fixed because of the need for certain
- temperature (KIc …. as T↑) material; density, corrosion resistance etc
- strain rate (KIc ….. as SR↑) 9 Or flaw size may be limited by detection equipment available.
- strengthening (usually KIc …… as σy↑)
BUT ONCE TWO PARAMETERS ARE FIXED SO IS THE THIRD!
- microstructure ( KIc ….. as grain size ↓)
Dr. M. Medraj Mech. Eng. Dept. - Concordia University MECH 321 lecture 9/13 Dr. M. Medraj Mech. Eng. Dept. - Concordia University MECH 321 lecture 9/14
Dr. M. Medraj Mech. Eng. Dept. - Concordia University MECH 321 lecture 9/17 Dr. M. Medraj Mech. Eng. Dept. - Concordia University MECH 321 lecture 9/18
Example: Example:
A 7049- T73 Al forging is the material of choice for an 8 cm-internal diameter,
hydraulic actuator cylindrical housing that has a wall thickness of 1 cm. After
manufacture, each cylinder is subjected to a safety check, involving a single
fluid over-pressurization that generates a hoop stress no higher than 50% σys.
The component design calls for an operating internal fluid pressure,
corresponding to a hoop stress no higher than 25% σys. Prior to over- Diagram showing growth of
pressurization, a 2mm-deep semicircular surface flaw that was oriented normal semi elliptical surface flaw to
semicircular configuration. At
to the hoop stress direction was discovered in one cylinder. Given that σys = leak condition (a = t), unbroken
460 MPa and KIc = 23 MPa.m1/2, ligaments (shaded areas) break
open to form through-thickness
a) Would the cylinder have survived the over-pressurization test? crack.
b) Would the cylinder experience a leak-before-break condition?
c) Also, what were the fluid pressure levels associated with the
overpressurization cycle and design stress?
Dr. M. Medraj Mech. Eng. Dept. - Concordia University MECH 321 lecture 9/19 Dr. M. Medraj Mech. Eng. Dept. - Concordia University MECH 321 lecture 9/20
Example: Example:
Dr. M. Medraj Mech. Eng. Dept. - Concordia University MECH 321 lecture 9/21 Dr. M. Medraj Mech. Eng. Dept. - Concordia University MECH 321 lecture 9/22
Next Time
Impact Test and Fatigue
Dr. M. Medraj Mech. Eng. Dept. - Concordia University MECH 321 lecture 9/23