Therzhagi indian theroy

1
 Introduction
Slip-line field theory is used to model plastic deformation in plane strain only for a
solid that can be represented as a rigid-plastic body. Elasticity is not included and
the loading has to be quasi-static.

This method has been recently largely superseded by finite element method, but
this theory can provide analytical solutions to a number of metal forming
processes, and utilises plots showing the directions of maximum shear stress in a
rigid-plastic body which is deforming plastically in plane strain.

(3)
7
 Assumptions
Besides the usual assumptions that the metal is
isotropic and homogeneous, the common
approach to this subject usually involves the
following:
– the metal is rigid-perfectly plastic; this implies
the neglect of elastic strains and treats the
flow stress as a constant,
– deformation is by plane strain,
– possible effects of temperature, strain rate, (3)
and time are not considered,
– there is a constant shear stress at the
interfacial boundary. Usually, either a
frictionless condition or sticking friction is
assumed.
8
 When the theory cannot be used
The principal ways in which slip-line field theory fails to take
account of the behavior of real materials are:

• it deals only with non-strain-hardening materials. Whilst

strain-hardening can be allowed for in calculations concerned
with loads in an approximate way, the manner in which strain
distribution is altered because of it is not always clear
• there is no allowance for creep or strain-rate effects. The rate
of deformation at each given point in space and in the
deforming body is generally different, and any effect this may
have on the yield stress is ignored.

9
 When the theory cannot be used (cont.)

• all inertia forces are neglected and the problems treated as quasi-
static (series of static states),

• in the forming operations which impose heavy deformations, most

of the work done is dissipated as heat; the temperatures attained
may affect the material properties of the body or certain physical
characteristics in the surroundings, e.g. lubrication

Despite these shortcomings, the theory is extremely useful; it is very

important, however, to remember its limitations and not to expect
too high a degree of correlation between experimental and
theoretical work.

10
 Plane plastic strain
Deformation which proceeds under conditions of plane strain is such
that the flow or deformation is everywhere parallel to a given plane,
say the (x, y) plane in a system of three mutually orthogonal planes
and the flow is independent of z.

Since elastic strains are neglected, the plastic strain increments (or
strain-rates) may be written in terms of the displacements (or
velocities) ux(x, y), vy(x, y), wz = 0, as below

1  u x v y 
 
u x
 x x
  xy
 
2  y

x 



v y 
1  v y wz  (1)
y  y
 yz
 
2  z
   0
y 


w 1  w u 
 z
 z 0
z
 zx
  z  x0
2  x z  11
 State of stress
It follows from the Levy-Mises relation that τxz and τyz are zero and therefore that σz
is a principal stress. The stress tensor will be:
Levy-Mises relationship between stress and strain for an ideal plastic solid where
the elastic strain are negligible

Because the material is incompressible έx = - έy and each incremental distortion is

thus a pure shear. The state of stress throughout the deforming material is
represented by a constant yield shear stress k, and a hydrostatic stress -p which in
general varies from point to point throughout the material. k is the yield shear
stress in plane strain and the yield criterion for this condition is:
 xy2  ( x   y )2 / 4  k 2
where k = Y/2 for the Tesca criterion and k = Y/ 3
12
for the Mises criterion.
Mohr’s circle diagram for stress in plane plastic
strain
The state of stress at any point in the deforming material may be
represented in the Mohr circle diagram

A and B represent the

stress states (- p, ±k)
at a point on planes
parallel to the slip-
lines through that
point.
p can vary, but k is
a material constant

13
 Directions of maximum shear strain-rate
The earlier analysis of plane strain plasticity in a simple case of uniaxial
compression established the basis of slip line field theory, which enables
the directions of plastic flow to be mapped out in plane strain plasticity
problems.
There will always be two perpendicular directions of maximum shear
stress in a plane. These generate two orthogonal families of slip lines
called α-lines and β-lines. (Labeling convention for α and β lines.)
The stresses on a small curvilinear element bounded by slip-lines are
shown below:
Therefore, the directions of maximum
shear stress and the directions of the
principal stresses σ1 and σ2 can vary
along a slip line.

(3) 14
 Slip lines

In order to determine the load necessary for a particular plastic

forming operation, first of all the slip-line field patterns must be
obtained. This means that equations for the variation of p along both
α- and β-lines must be derived. Also, we must check that all velocity
conditions along α- and β-lines are satisfied.

15
 The Stress Equations
The equations of equilibrium for plane strain are,

 x  xy
 0
x y (3)
 xy  y
 0
x y
The above stress components σx, σy and τxy expressed in terms of p
and k are:
 x   p  k sin 2
 y   p  k sin 2 (4)

 xy  k cos 2
p is the normal or hydrostatic pressure on the two planes of yield
shear stress.
16
 The Stress Equations (cont.)
Differentiating and substituting from equation (4) in equation (3) we
have:
p  
  2k cos 2  2k sin 2 0
x x y (5)
 p 
 2k sin 2   2k cos 2 0
x y y
If now the α- and β-lines are taken to coincide with 0x and 0y at 0,
that we take ø = 0, equations (5) become:

p 
  2k 0
x x (6)
p 
  2k 0
y y
17
 The Stress Equations (cont.)
Thus, integrating

p  2k  f1 ( y )  C1 (7)

p  2k  f 2 ( x)  C 2
If the hydrostatic stress p can be determined at any one point on a slip-
line (for example at a boundary), it can be deduced everywhere else.

Thus

p  2k  const . along an   line

(8)
p  2k  const . along an   line

18
Relations governing hydrostatic stress along
slip-lines (Hencky equations)

The equations (8) are known as the Hencky equations and are
equivalent to the equilibrium equations for a fully plastic mass
stressed in plane strain.

In general, the values of the constants C1 and C2 from equation (7)

vary from one slip-line to another.

19
 The velocity field (Geiringer equations)

In figure shown below u and v are the component velocities of a

particle at a point O along a pair of α- and β-slip-lines the α-line being
inclined at ø to the Ox axis of a pair of orthogonal cartesian axes
through O.

20
The velocity field (Geiringer equations) cont.
The components of the velocity of the particle ux and vy parallel to Ox
and Oy, respectively, are then
u x  u cos   v sin 
(9)
v y  u sin   v cos 
Taking the x-direction at point 0 tangential to the α-line, i.e.
ø = 0.

 u x  u 
   v (10)
 x  0 x x

21
The velocity field (Geiringer equations) cont.

Since εx = ∂ux/∂x is zero along a slip-line

u 
v  0 along an   line
x x (11)

du  vd  0 along an   line

similarly it can be shown that
dv  ud  0 along an   line (12)

Physically, it may be imagined that small rods lying on the slip-line

directions at a point do not undergo extension or contraction.

22
 Refrences

1. Johnson, W., Mellor, P. B., Engineering Plasticity, Ellis Hordwood

Limited, 1983
2. Hosford, W. F ., Metal forming: mechanics and metallurgy 2nd ed . -
Englewood Cliffs, N.J : Prentice Hall, 1993
3. www.DoITPoMS.ac.uk, University of Cambridge

26