[go: up one dir, main page]

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
144 views3 pages

Prof Discussion

The document discusses the delegation of powers between the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government. It outlines requirements for valid administrative issuances like the Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR). Namely, the IRR must be authorized, within the scope of authority given, promulgated according to procedure, and reasonable. It also discusses tests for valid delegation like the completeness and sufficient standard tests. Cases cited discuss delegation to agencies, the executive, and emergency powers.

Uploaded by

Lex Acads
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
144 views3 pages

Prof Discussion

The document discusses the delegation of powers between the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government. It outlines requirements for valid administrative issuances like the Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR). Namely, the IRR must be authorized, within the scope of authority given, promulgated according to procedure, and reasonable. It also discusses tests for valid delegation like the completeness and sufficient standard tests. Cases cited discuss delegation to agencies, the executive, and emergency powers.

Uploaded by

Lex Acads
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Delegation of Powers -standard used to justify the validity of IRR: the regulation of medicine

has been a recognized standard to be admitted in med school


-legislative: makes the law
-implied standard: public safety
-judicial: implements the law
-valid exercise of police power:
-executive: executes the law
*reasonable connection with act and resolution
-Supreme in their own sphere
*to promote general welfare
GR: non-delegation of powers
Pelaez
EX:
-President has only supervisory functions
-while it is essentially legislative, it may be delegated but subject to 2
Requirements of IRR tests (completeness & sufficient standard test)
Lokin -sec 68 does not state the policy/objective of the law
Requisites for a valid administrative IRR: -did not pass completeness + sufficient standard test
1. Its promulgation must be authorized by the Legislature; Abakada
2. It must be within the scope of the authority given by the Legislature; -oversight committee should only exercise __ to prevent the violation
3. It must be promulgated in accordance with the prescribed procedure; of separation of powers
and *scrutiny is allowed
4. It must be reasonable. *investigation is allowed
Umali *legislative supervision is not allowed
-operative fact doctrine: “the actual existence of a statute prior to such Gerochi
a determination is an operative fact and may have consequences which
cannot always be erased by a new judicial declaration.” -completeness test: primary purpose of the law in this case is to have a
viable electric power industry
-sufficient standard:
Delegation to Agencies
-every law enjoys presumption of constitutionality (if one assails, then it
Tablarin should be based on clear evidence)
Dagan Delegation to Executive
-Did Philracom delegate its power to Manila Jockey Club? NO, merely Garcia v Exec Sec
a directive
-sufficient standard? YES
-no GADALEJ
*Basis: National economy, general welfare, security
Ynot
Powers of Administrative Agencies
-executive x legislative powers conferred to Marcos
Eastern Shipping Lines v. POEA
-from Consti, EO is like an act of Congress
-2 basic powers of admin agencies:
US v Nag Tang Ho
*quasi-legislative: implementing rules and regulations (notice
and hearing not required) -completeness test? NO, it doesn’t state until when the proclamation is
valid
*quasi-judicial: interpret and apply regulations (notice and
hearing required) *Act 2868 does not make it criminal

CT Torres *proclamation made it a crime

-HLURB given a quasi-legislative function of the statute -gov general delegated powers to provincial officers = IMPROPER
DELEGATION

PHILCOMSAT
Delegation of Emergency Powers by the President
-quasi-judicial function
Araneta v. Dinglasan
-valid delegation? YES
-emergency powers is limited to period during the war so Eos issued
-valid fixing of rate? NO – there should be notice or hearing after that should be declared as void because it was issued without
authority
Smart v. NTC
-exhaustion of administrative remedies; when should you exhaust? Only
applicable in quasi-judicial function Rodriguez v. Gella
-same issues w/ Araneta
-President vetoed bill that repeals all emergency powers acts
-EOs are inoperative as well. Same ruling w/ Araneta
-even if pres vetoes the House Bill, such bill is acknowledged as a
concurrent resolution (express intent of legislative to terminate power)

People v. Vera
-petitioners were saying that probation encroaches the power to grant
pardon by the pres which is executive in nature
-does probation encroach on the exec power of president? NO
- pardon (executive) v probation (judicial)
*pardon: as if no crime is committed
*probation: suspension of sentence but there is still a crime &
penalty (convict is under supervision of a probationary officer)
-undue delegation of legislative power? YES
*no standard, not complete; discretionary power given to
provincial boards
*some provinces opt to apply probation law, some opt not to
= violates EPC
-entire law is void (even if only sec 11 was struck down) because such
provision affects the entire law
-GR: if provision is void, only that provision is void; other provs may
still be valid
-EX: such provision is connected/essential to the effectivity of the
entire statute

You might also like