Fuzzy Logic Controller for Superheated Steam
Temperature Control
                                Mohammad Shahid and Prof. Ibraheem and Prof. Zaheeruddin
                                                Department of Electrical Engineering
                                               Faculty of Engineering and Technology
                                                         Jamia Millia Islamia
                                                       New Delhi-110025 India
                                                    mshahid.shazeb@gmail.com
                                                      ibraheem_2k@yahoo.com
                                                       zaheer_2k@hotmail.com
Abstract— The precision control of superheated steam fed to              The efficiency of boiler mainly depends on superheated
turbines for the generation of electrical power has been a           steam temperature. With the development of advanced control
challenging task for control engineers for a long time. There are    systems in the conventional controllers are getting replaced for
several limitations that are associated with conventional control    superheated steam temperature control. In power boilers the
philosophies used for this purpose. The modern control               temperatures of superheated steam depends on the amount of
techniques are being preferred due to their inherent merits over     fuel input, angle of the flame burner ,load etc. spray water
the conventional control techniques in thermal power plants in       which is a manipulating variable is used to control the
general and for superheated steam temperature control in             temperature of the superheated steam. The overall cycle
particular. These days, fuzzy logic control concept is one of the
                                                                     efficiency is very sensitive to this parameter and a tight control
intelligent control techniques which has been the revolutionary
applications in power system operation and control. In this
                                                                     of this parameter would also ensure a better life of boiler
paper, an attempt has been made to design fuzzy logic based PID      components. For example, a one percent fall in thermal
controllers for superheater temperature control of a boiler. The     efficiency of a 500MW unit would amount to burning an extra
PID controllers based on are also designed. Considering a small      coal of about 10,000 tons per annum. Therefore, it becomes
change in inlet temperature as the disturbance, the PID              very important to increase the efficiency of thermal turbines by
controllers designed in the study are implemented and the            implementing properly designed regulators for the turbine
dynamic response plots are obtained. Standard SIMULINK               outputs. The temperature control of superheated steam should
Software is used on MATLAB platform to get the results. The          be considered as an important parameter as a first step in this
investigations of simulation studies demonstrate the superiority     regard.
of fuzzy logic based controllers over the conventional PID
controllers designed using ZEIGLER-NICHOLS tuning                        In the past few years there has been a tremendous increase
                                                                     in the popularity of PID controllers. The test of the evolution of
technique.
                                                                     the PID is that, actually most of the classical industrial
                                                                     controllers have procedure to automate its parameters. Then, if
   Keywords- Superheated steam, Intelligent techniques, PID
controller, Ziegler-Nichols tuning, Fuzzy logic controller
                                                                     we can get a good model of the process, given by analytic
                                                                     linear equation, direct technique of control are the simplest and
                                                                     less cost alternatives. The classical PID controller provides an
                I.   INTRODUCTION (HEADING 1)                        accurate and efficient solution to linear control problems. But
    The electrical energy consumption has been considered as a       the involved process are in general complex, time variant, with
prime index to determine the trend of development of a               delays and non-linearity’s and very often, with a poorly-
country. Therefore, for overall development of a country,            defined dynamics. When the processes are too complex to be
availability of electric energy is one of the important              described by analytic models, they are hardly controlled by
requirements. As far as our country is concerned, there is           drastic approaches that simplifies them but do not get the
always a gap exists between requirement of energy and its            required efficiency. To circumvent, some of these problems,
availability. Major part of electrical power generation in India     modern control techniques have emerged for their applications
comes from fossil fuel fired power plants. These fossil reserves     in power systems. However, optimal control technique based
are depleting rapidly. In order to conserve fossil reserves, the     on full state vector feedback has its limitations for practical
power plant should run more efficiently. In the chain of thermal     applications due to its requirement of availability of all system
cycle, since boiler is the front end requirement, its role plays a   states for their measurement.
major importance in the overall reliability and efficiency of a         The evolution of intelligent control concepts like, artificial
thermal power plant. In turn the efficiency of the boiler            Neural Network, Fuzzy logic, Genetic Algorithm and Neuro-
depends on several operating parameters, and superheated             Fuzzy control system has changed the whole scenario of
steam temperature is one amongst them, which is very                 control systems as far the design and implantation of
important.                                                           controllers for practical systems are concerned. Fuzzy logic
control concept (FLC) is one of the fittest tools to counter the                       III.    DESIGN of PID CONTROLLER
vagueness associated in defining/describing the physical
systems. The parts of physical power system are having various     The design of controller consists of the following two steps:
parameters which can not be modeled accurately. The                (1) Selection of the mode of the controller, say proportional
mathematical modeling of superheater used for reheat the
                                                                       or integral or derivative control or their combination (P,
steam available is done with some assumptions to simplify the
                                                                       PI, or PID).
mathematical manipulations. Therefore, the analysis/
investigations carried out with these approximated models do       (2) Specification of the value of the parameters associated
not serve the purpose of providing accurate and realistic              with the selected control mode (Kp, Ki, and Kd).
results. With the application of fuzzy logic control concept in        The above two steps are to be executed by properly
the design of controllers for superheated steam temperature,       designing Kp, Ki, and Kd of in order to meet the specification
more realistic studies can be carried out. In this work, FLC is    of the closed-loop system such as overshoot/ undershoot, decay
considered as one of the intelligent control concepts for          ratio, settling time, rise time, etc, in time domain(or) gain
application to superheated steam temperature control.              margin, phase margin, bandwidth, etc, in frequency domain.
    II.   DESIGN PARAMETERS OF SUPERHEATING SYSTEM                 A. Tuning of conventional controllers
    For the present study, a superheated steam turbine is             The conventional PID controllers may be tuned using well
considered for the investigation. The block diagram of the         known Zeigler-Nichols Technique as;
system is shown in Fig.1. A brief description of various parts
and their design parameters are explained in the ensuing                 Zeigler-Nichols Technique
paragraphs.                                                              Increase the proportional gain until the system oscillates;
                                                                          that gain is the ultimate gain Ku.
                                                                         Read the time between peaks Tcr at this setting.
                                                                         Table- 1 gives approximate values for the controller gains.
                                                                                      TABLE I.        ZEIGLER-NICHOLAS RULES
                                                                       Controller     Gain K     Integration time Ti     Derivation time Td
                                                                           P          0.5Kcr
           Figure 1. Control System with Single Controller.                PI         0.5Kcr          0.85Tcr
                                                                          PID         0.6Kcr           0.5Tcr                  0.125Tcr
Desuperheater : The response of outlet temperature to the
changes in spray water is instantaneous. Hence, there is no           The Simulink model of PID controller implementation on
dynamics involved the coefficient connecting the spray change      superheater is shown in Fig.2.
to change in outlet temperature at 100% load has been derived.
Super heater : In this system the inlet temperature of the super
heater is increased by a factor of 1.3882 at 100% load for
a500MW boiler because of heat input from the furnace. This
model has been made available for simulation purpose for this
project which is given below:
(1.3882/19^5)/(s+0.0526) ^5
Transducer : It measures the outlet temperature of the
                                                                                      Figure 2. Super heater with PID controller.
superheated steam whose time constant is of the order of 10
sec. this time delay is added on to the delay of the
superheating system for simulation purpose.                                     IV.     DESIGN OF FUZZY LOGIC CONTROLLER
                                                                       FLC is mainly used for system whose mathematical models
Control valve : The time constant of control valve is different    are difficult to derive from, first principle. The heart of the FLC
for opening and closing. This value is of the order of 10          is to form knowledge base which can be obtained from the
seconds for closing and 5 seconds for openings per data            experts in that field. In power boilers, the temperature of
provided by the manufacturers. The overall steady state            superheated steam depends upon the amount of fuel input,
coefficient for control valve and desuperheater is found to be     angle of the flame burner, load etc. spray water which is
0.556 relating the change at the superheated outlet temperature    manipulating variable, is used to control the temperature with
to the change in the controller design.                            spray water. This time constant varies inversely with load.
   Block diagram of this control system with a single FLC
controller is given in Fig.3.
   Figure 3.   Simulink model of superheater with Fuzzy logic controller.
     The FLC contains two input variables (error and error rate)
and one output variable. At every time instant FLC computes                                          Figure 7. Output.
the change of output and adds to the previous output to get the
current value. The membership functions and their ranges for
all the input and output variables are as detailed below:
A. Mamdani Model
                        Figure 4. Mamdani Model.
B. Membership Function                                                                           Figure 8. Control Surface.
   No of membership functions: 3
   Labels are small, medium and large.                                      C. Expert Rules
                                                                               The following 9 rules are applicable for this controller:
                                                                            (1) If (ERROR is SMALL) and (ERROR RATE is SMALL)
                                                                                then (CONTROL is SMALL).
                                                                            (2) If (ERROR is SMALL) and (ERROR RATE is MEDIUM)
                                                                                then (CONTROL is SMALL).
                                                                            (3) If (ERROR is SMALL) and (ERROR RATE is LARGE)
                                                                                then (CONTROL is MEDIUM).
                                                                            (4) If (ERROR is MEDIUM) and (ERROR RATE is SMALL)
                                                                                then (CONTROL is SMALL).
                             Figure 5.   Error.                             (5) If (ERROR is MEDIUM) and (ERROR RATE is
                                                                                MEDIUM) then (CONTROL is MEDIUM).
                                                                            (6) If (ERROR is MEDIUM) and (ERROR RATE is LARGE)
                                                                                then (CONTROL is LARGE).
                                                                            (7) If (ERROR is LARGE) and (ERROR RATE is SMALL)
                                                                                then (CONTROL is MEDIUM).
                                                                            (8) If (ERROR is LARGE) and (ERROR RATE is MEDIUM)
                                                                                then (CONTROL is LARGE).
                                                                            (9) If (ERROR is LARGE) and (ERROR RATE is LARGE)
                                                                                then (CONTROL is LARGE).
                           Figure 6. Error rate.
                     V.     SIMULATION RESULTS                                                            VII. REFERENCES
    This paper presents design of PID controller using Ziegler-               [1]    H.Ying, Fuzzy Control & Modeling:Analytical foundations and
Nichols (ZN) technique for higher order system. A Fuzzy logic                        applications. New York, IEEE Press, 2000.
controller using simple approach & smaller rule set is                        [2]    Fuzzy logic toolbox for use with MATLAB,user’s guide,rev.2(1995)
proposed. Simulation results are demonstrated. Performance                    [3]    J. Zhang, N. Wang and S. Wang, “A developed method of tuning PID
                                                                                     controllers with fuzzy rules for integrating process,” Proceedings of the
analysis shows the effectiveness of the proposed Fuzzy logic                         American Control Conference,Boston, 2004, pp. 1109-1114.
controller as compared to the ZN tuned PID controller. The
                                                                              [4]    D.M WIberg, fuzzy logic and control.schaum’s outline series.Mc-Graw-
result shows the fuzzy logic controller has less overshoot and                       Hill.New York,NY2007.
settling time as compared to conventional PID controller. It                  [5]    K.H. Ang, G. Chong and Y. Li, “PID control system analysis, design
shows the overall improvement in the performance of the                              and technology,” IEEE transaction on Control System Technology,
system. Fig.9.shows the natural response of the superheater,                         Vol.13, No.4, 2005, pp. 559-576.
and the controlled output is shown in Fig.9. and Fig.10.                      [6]    P. Cominos and N. Munro. “PID controllers: recent tuning methods and
                                                                                     design to specification, ” IEE proceedings,Control Theory and
                                                                                     Applications, 2002, pp. 46-53.
                                                                              [7]    L. A. Zadeh and C.A. fuzzy logic and state functions: A static space
                                                                                     approach. Mc Graw Hill. New York,1990
                                                                              [8]    S.Chopra, R.Mitra and V.Kumar, “Fuzzy controller:Choosing an
                                                                                     appropriate & smallest rule set, ”International Journal of Computational
                                                                                     Cognition, Vol.3, No.4, 2005, pp. 73-78.
                                                                              [9]    S.R.Vaishnav, Z.J.Khan, Design and Performance of PID and Fuzzy
                                                                                     Logic Controller with Smaller Rule Set for Higher Order System,”
 Figure 9. Natural response of superheater with 50c step change (in input).          WCECS 2007, October 24-26, 2007, San Francisco, USA”
                                                                              [10]   K. Astrom and T. Hagglund, PID controllers: Theory, design and tuning.
                                                                                     2nd ed., The Instrumentation, Systems and Automation Society
                                                                                     (ISA),1995.
                                                                              [11]   Y.Yongquan, H.Ying and Z.Bi, “The dynamic fuzzy method to tune the
                                                                                     weight factors of Neural fuzzy PID controller,” IEEE, 2004, pp.2397-
                                                                                     2402.
                                                                              [12]   Z.Y. Zhao, M. Tomizuka and S. Isaka, “ Fuzzy gain scheduling of PID
                                                                                     controllers, ” IEEE transactions on Systems, Man and
                                                                                     Cybernetics,Vol.23, No.5, 1993, pp. 1392 -1398.
                                                                              [13]   Zaheeruddin, “A Simple Technique for Generation and Minimization of
      Figure 10. Controlled output superheated using PID controller.                 Fuzzy Rules”, Proceedings of The IEEE International Conference on
                                                                                     Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-2005), pp. 489-494, held at Reno, Nevada, USA,
                                                                                     May 22-25, 2005
 Figure 11. Controlled output of superheater using Fuzzy logic controller.
                          VI.     CONCLUSION
    The paper presented an overview of PID controller, design
of PID controller using Z-N technique and design of fuzzy
logic controller for higher order system. Simulation results
using
    MATLAB / SIMULINK are discussed for Ziegler Nichols
tuned PID controller, fine tuned PID controller and the Fuzzy
logic controller, and this conventional controller’s performance
is compared with the new FLC. The FLC gives the overall
better performance than that of PID controllers.
    For the output of total system the FLC gives negligibly less
overshoot and also gives overall less settling time for the
disturbances. These are the major advantages observed from
the fuzzy controller design. For this controller design the effect
of feed forward disturbances on the system are vary less and
neglected. For further research work, one may take the feed
forward disturbances also into account.