Approximating Signals Supported On Graphs
Approximating Signals Supported On Graphs
Approximating Signals Supported On Graphs
ABSTRACT the GFT. Those properties imply that if the eigenvalues of a graphs
Laplacian matrix roughly maintain an increasing trend, then smooth
In this paper, we investigate the notion of smoothness for signals signals on that graph are likely to be compressible.
supported on the vertices of a graph. We provide theoretical expla- The rest of this paper is organized as follows: In Section 2, the
nations when and why the Laplacian eigenbasis can be regarded as notion of smoothness for signals supported on graphs is defined and
a meaningful Fourier transform of such signals. Moreover, we we derive certain properties of the GFT. Based on these properties,
analyze the desired properties of the underlying graphs for better we give rules of thumb for generating graphs where the signal is
compressibility of the signals. We verify our theoretical work by compressible. In Section 3, we conduct experiments on real world
experiments on real world data. data to verify our GFT theory, and we conclude in Section 4.
Index Terms Graph Laplacian, Fourier transform, smooth-
ness, compressibility 2. THE GRAPH FOURIER TRANSFORM
The first inequality holds due to the fact l (M, f ) l (m, f ) for all 3. EXPERIMENT RESULTS
m M . Since + \2
P
P+ i=0 ii |f (i )| < +, we have 3.1. Experiment Setup
m=M/2 m l (m, f ) < +. Thus,
In this section, we investigate the performance of the graph Fourier
+
X on the data from California Irrigation Management Information Sys-
lim m l (m, f ) = 0. (5) tem (CIMIS) [12]. This dataset is generated by weather stations
M
m=M/2 around the state of California. We use the solar radiation data for one
PM 1 day which contains 135 readings from different weather stations. We
Moreover, it is clear that M
2 M/2
m=M/2 m , Accordingly, utilize KNN graphs based on the geographical information of each
Eq.2, Eq.3, along with Eq.5 implies that
weather station to build its GFT basis.
lim M M/2 l (f, M ) = 0. We will compare the performance of compressed sensing
M
[13, 14], linear approximation and non-linear approximation on
this dataset. For compressed sensing, we randomly select a number
of the readings from the sensor nodes as the measurement and use earlier discussion about the choice of parameter K. Given a constant
LASSO in graph Fourier basis as the signal recovery algorithm. All compression rate, the best performance of Compressed Sensing ap-
experiments repeat 50 times and the average values are reported. pears when K is in 510. When K is smaller than 5, the graph
is unconnected with high probability. In this case, we have multiple
10 zero eigenvalues. When K become larger than 30, the graph approx-
Compressed Sensing imate the complete graph, which also gives a poor compressibility.
0 Linear Approximation
Nonlinear Approximation
10 4. CONCLUSION
20
This paper analyzes a concept of the GFT. To the best of our knowl-
Distortion(dB)
30
edge, this is the very first work to address (i) when we can com-
press signals supported on graphs using he graph Laplacian eigen-
40 basis, and (ii) what conditions the graph and signals should satisfy
for approximation. We define the smoothness of signals supported
50
on graphs and show its impact on the linear approximation error.
60 The GFT extends the conventional approximation theory to signals
on graphs. We believe it has a lot of potential applications including
70 in the realms of sensor networks, computer graphics and compressed
80
sensing.
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
Compression Ratio
5. REFERENCES
Fig. 1. Performance comparison of Compressed Sensing, linear ap- [1] W. Bajwa, J. Haupt, A. Sayeed, and R. Nowak, Compressive wire-
proximation and non-linear approximation on the CIMIS dataset. less sensing, in Proceedings of the 5th international conference on
Information processing in sensor networks. ACM, 2006, pp. 134142.
[2] W. Bajwa, A. Sayeed, and R. Nowak, Matched source-channel com-
munication for field estimation in wireless sensor networks, in Pro-
0.7
ceedings of the 4th international symposium on Information processing
M=80
M=60
in sensor networks. IEEE Press, 2005, pp. 44es.
0.6 M=20 [3] Z. Karni and C. Gotsman, Spectral compression of mesh geome-
try, in Proceedings of the 27th annual conference on Computer graph-
0.5 ics and interactive techniques. ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing
Co., 2000, pp. 279286.
Distortion(MSE)