Complex Analysis - George Cain (Chapter 4 - Integration)
Complex Analysis - George Cain (Chapter 4 - Integration)
Complex Analysis - George Cain (Chapter 4 - Integration)
Integration
t 2 1 it 3 dt 4 i.
3 4
0
Nothing really new here. The excitement begins when we consider the idea of an integral
of an honest-to-goodness complex function f : D C, where D is a subset of the complex
plane. Let’s define the integral of such things; it is pretty much a straight-forward extension
to two dimensions of what we did in one dimension back in Mrs. Turner’s class.
4.1
Note we do not even require that a b; but in case a b, we must specify an orientation
for the closed path C. We call a path, or curve, closed in case the initial and terminal points
are the same, and a simple closed path is one in which no other points coincide. Next, let P
be a partition of the curve; that is, P z 0 , z 1 , z 2 , , z n is a finite subset of C, such that
a z 0 , b z n , and such that z j comes immediately after z j1 as we travel along C from a to
b.
A Riemann sum associated with the partition P is just what it is in the real case:
n
SP fz j z j ,
j1
where z j is a point on the arc between z j1 and z j , and z j z j z j1 . (Note that for a
given partition P, there are many SP—depending on how the points z j are chosen.) If
there is a number L so that given any 0, there is a partition P of C such that
|SP L|
Some properties of integrals are more or less evident from looking at Riemann sums:
cfzdz c fzdz
C C
4.2
fz gzdz fzdz gzdz
C C C
4.2 Evaluating integrals. Now, how on Earth do we ever find such an integral? Let
: , C be a complex description of the curve C. We partition C by partitioning the
interval , in the usual way: t 0 t 1 t 2 t n . Then
a , t 1 , t 2 , , b is partition of C. (Recall we assume that t 0
for a complex description of a curve C.) A corresponding Riemann sum looks like
n
SP ft j t j t j1 .
j1
We have chosen the points z j t j , where t j1 t j t j . Next, multiply each term in the
sum by 1 in disguise:
n
SP ft j t jtj tt
j1
j1
t j t j1 .
j1
Example
First, let C 1 be the part of the parabola y x 2 connecting the two points. A complex
description of C 1 is 1 t t it 2 , 0 t 1:
4.3
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
2t 2 2t 4 5t 3 idt
0
4 5i
15 4
Next, let’s integrate along the straight line segment C 2 joining 0 and 1 i.
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
Here we have 2 t t it, 0 t 1. Thus, 2 t 1 i, and our integral looks like
4.4
1
t it 2t 2 dt
0
1 7i
2 6
Finally, let’s integrate along C 3 , the path consisting of the line segment from 0 to 1
together with the segment from 1 to 1 i.
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
We shall do this in two parts: C 31 , the line from 0 to 1 ; and C 32 , the line from 1 to 1 i.
Then we have
fzdz t 2 dt 1.
3
C 31 0
4.5
Thus,
1 3 i.
6 2
|ft t|dt
Exercises
2. Evaluate 1
z dz, where C is the circle of radius 2 centered at 0 oriented
C
counterclockwise.
1 for y 0
fz .
4y for y 0
5. Let C be the part of the circle t e it in the first quadrant from a 1 to b i. Find as
small an upper bound as you can for z 2 z 4 5dz .
C
4.6
6. Evaluate fzdz where fz z 2 z and C is the path from z 0 to z 1 2i
C
consisting of the line segment from 0 to 1 together with the segment from 1 to 1 2i.
d gt u dx u dy i v dx v dy .
dt x dt y dt x dt y dt
The places at which the functions on the right-hand side of the equation are evaluated are
obvious. Now, apply the Cauchy-Riemann equations:
d gt u dx v dy i v dx u dy
dt x dt x dt x dt x dt
u i v dx i dy
x x dt dt
g t t.
Now, back to integrals. Let F : D C and suppose F z fz in D. Suppose moreover
that a and b are in D and that C D is a contour from a to b. Then
4.7
Fb Fa.
This is very pleasing. Note that integral depends only on the points a and b and not at all
on the path C. We say the integral is path independent. Observe that this is equivalent to
saying that the integral of f around any closed path is 0. We have thus shown that if in D
the integrand f is the derivative of a function F, then any integral fzdz for C D is path
C
independent.
Example
1 i
Let C be the curve y x2
from the point z 1 i to the point z 3 9
. Let’s find
z 2 dz.
C
1
This is easy—we know that F z z 2 , where Fz 3
z 3 . Thus,
3
z 2 dz 1 1 i 3 3 i
3 9
C
260 728 i
27 2187
Now, instead of assuming f has an antiderivative, let us suppose that the integral of f
between any two points in the domain is independent of path and that f is continuous.
Assume also that every point in the domain D is an interior point of D and that D is
connected. We shall see that in this case, f has an antiderivative. To do so, let z 0 be any
point in D, and define the function F by
Fz fzdz,
Cz
where C z is any path in D from z 0 to z. Here is important that the integral is path
independent, otherwise Fz would not be well-defined. Note also we need the assumption
that D is connected in order to be sure there always is at least one such path.
4.8
Now, for the computation of the derivative of F:
Now then,
1
z fs fzds 1 |z| max|fs fz| : sL z
z
L z
0.
4.9
In other words, F z fz, and so, just as promised, f has an antiderivative! Let’s
summarize what we have shown in this section:
Exercises
cos z dz.
2
C
1 dz.
z
C1
1 dz.
z
C2
9. Let C be the circle of radius 1 centered at 0 with the clockwise orientation. Find
1 dz.
z
C
4.10
Fzdz,
C
11. Suppose P is a polynomial and C is a closed curve. Explain how you know that
Pzdz 0.
C
4.11