DNA catalysts, known as DNAzymes, have arguably been limited for decades by the lack of mechanistic information. The solution structure of the 8–17 DNAzyme reported by Wieruszekska, Pwlowicz et al. reassesses the current thinking regarding the relationship between structure, dynamic, and metal ion coordination.
High-precision DNA-based biocatalysts, known as DNA enzymes or DNAzymes, are experiencing a revival in biotechnological, analytical, and therapeutical applications. Discovered in the 1990s, mechanistic insights in their mode-of-action have been sparse for decades, coinciding with inherent limitations associated with their desired cellular applications. It appears that the current emerging interest in the DNAzyme technology is primarily due to three technological advances: (i) general progress in related nucleic acid-based therapeutics overcoming limitations in DNAzyme delivery, (ii) the availability of chemically modified building blocks to increase bioactivity and stability, and (iii) developments in our mechanistic understanding of the system. The latter gained momentum by deciphering several molecular structures of DNAzymes; starting with the crystal structure of the RNA-ligating 9DB1 DNAzyme1, followed by the crystal structure of the 8–17 DNAzyme2, and the recent solution structure of the 10-23 DNAzyme3. The 8–17 and 10-23 DNAzymes are among the most prominent DNAzymes and are capable of target-selective RNA cleavage4.
The work of Wieruszekska, Pwlowicz et al. now contributes the solution structure of the 8–17 DNAzyme (Dz)5. A remarkable feature of the structure (solved in presence of Zn2+ and Na+) is its high similarity to the corresponding crystal structure (solved in presence of Pb2+). This result reshapes the current understanding of the Dz mechanism, so far suggested to use different structural arrangements associated with the coordination of different metal ions. To obtain the reported Dz solution structure, Wieruszewska, Pawlowicz et al. optimized construct design to improve NMR-spectral features (Fig. 1a, b). Generating a single-sequence DNA construct with shortened arms (Fig. 1b) yielded well-resolved data and enabled structure calculation of an NMR ensemble with low RMSD values (Fig. 1c, d).
A central aspect of DNAzyme activity is the role of metal-ion cofactors, essential for Dz-mediated substrate cleavage. Previous studies have demonstrated that different divalent metal ions can serve as co-factors. The solution structure of Dz was determined in the presence of Zn2+ and Na+ and is structurally similar to the crystal structures of Dz in the absence and presence of Pb2+2, this finding is surprising since previous FRET studies showed, that the Zn2+ and Mg2+ bound forms of Dz are more condensed than the metal-ion-free state6,7. In addition, a condensation step was also observed preceding the metal-ion-induced substrate cleavage6. In contrast this effect could not be observed for the catalytically more activating Pb2+, which led to the long-standing hypothesis that Pb2+-dependent catalysis follows a different mechanism dictated by a distinct fold6.
To better understand and explain the potentially contradicting results Wieruszewska, Pawlowicz et al. studied the Zn2+, Mg2+, Na+, and Pb2+ induced folding by NMR and CD spectroscopy5. The respective titration experiments on non-cleavable (all DNA) constructs revealed comparable structural effects induced by all tested metal ions. However, a substantial dissimilarity between Pb2+ and the other tested divalent ions was detected, when the titration was complemented with activity assays. Here the observed rate constants of Mg2+ and Zn2+ induced substrate cleavage (kobs) reached saturation in the mM range. This is about two orders of magnitude larger that the observed apparent dissociation constant (Kd) of the respective metal ions that is associated with the Mg2+/Zn2+-induced structural changes. This observation suggests the presence of at least two metal ion binding side (MBS I and II), one that induces structural condensation (MBS I with high affinity for Mg2+ and Zn2+) and a second binding side additionally required for substrate cleavage (MBS II with lower affinity for Mg2+ and Zn2+). In strong contrast for Pb2+ titrations, kobs is saturated at much lower Pb2+ concentrations, which are comparable to the respective Kd values for Pb2+ binding to MBS I.
Based on their observations Wieruszekska, Pwlowicz et al. develop a unified model that can accommodate the previous and current data. According to this model the interplay of dynamics and conformational plasticity and its modulation by the respective metal ions is the central element of Dz activity (Fig. 2). In this regard, the differential affinities of Mg2+/Zn2+ to MBS I and II will promote the population of an activated precatalytic complex that is characterized by a structural condensation induced by occupancy of MBS I. Subsequent and less frequent occupation of MBS II will than lead to substrate cleavage. The presence of Pb2+, however, does not lead to a strongly overpopulated condensed form, since comparable affinities to MBS I and II could promote cleavage before stabilizing a condensed form over a longer time. Remaining differences in reported behaviours could then be attributed to blind spots in the respective detection techniques, variations in experimental conditions, or differential behaviour associated with different sequences. To further support their model, Wieruszekska, Pwlowicz et al. also pinpoint MBS I via chemical shift perturbations, showing that MBS I is not directly involved in catalysis, and demonstrating that scaffolding the Dz with high concentrations of Mg2+ assists cleavage in presence of Pb2+5. In light of this model, it can be argued that the solution structure is in its activated condensed form, since all ion-dependent effects are saturated under the applied conditions (i.e., 3 mM Zn2+, 200 mM NaCl). The high similarities to the previous crystal structures of the Dz’s Pb2+-bound form and in absence of Pb2+ (Fig, 1d), further suggest that the respective structures represent the same state and may have formed due to selection bias under the chosen crystallization conditions.
Concluding Remarks
In general, the structural data reported by Wieruszekska, Pwlowicz et al. confirm that NMR spectroscopy is a powerful tool to determine a well-defined molecular arrangement of DNAzymes in solution (Fig. 1c). Simultaneously, these data also identify the interplay of multiple conformational, dynamic exchange processes, conformational plasticity, and its modulation by metal ions as central features responsible for the catalytic capability of the system. Excitingly, these features share high similarities with the 10-23 DNAzyme despite their strongly diverging structural architecture3,8, suggesting that DNA catalysts are highly dynamic molecules that are exceptionally dependent on the applied measurement condition. In this respect the strength of NMR spectroscopy is the ability to investigate the system in solution, and under adequate buffer conditions and temperatures. However, determining the exact localization of the central metal ion cofactors is still a bottleneck of the technique and may strongly benefit from complementary crystallographic and molecular dynamic simulations capturing the catalytically relevant state. The dynamic features of the system as well as a quantitative analysis of the occurrence and population of different states may be sensitive to construct engineering and crystallisation conditions. Therefore, these aspects must be carefully evaluated when linking the respective structural features with their mechanistic implications in the native system.
The structural and biophysical data reported by Wieruszekska, Pwlowicz et al. unravel key features of the system while highlighting a number of open questions that should be investigated in subsequent studies. These include the importance of buffer conditions to disentangle the effects of monovalent and divalent metal ions and potential cooperative effects between multiple binding sites in FRET studies, as well as possible effects of different arm sequences and artificial modifications.
In conclusion, it appears that a better understanding of the dynamic world of DNA catalysts is emerging as a central element in our view of these fascinating systems. In this picture specific DNA sequences, which on their own predominantly sample catalytically inactive conformations, can be stabilized in an active conformation by the appropriate metal ions. While this scaffolding step may be required for activity, it may not be sufficient, advocating for the need of a second metal ion for catalysis. Consequently, metal-ion dependent affinities, occupation times in the different binding sides, and cooperative effects determine the population of activated (scaffolded) states as well as catalytic rates. For the 8–17 DNAzyme, the data suggest that Pb2+ is a particularly potent cofactor due to its favourable interactions in MBS II that are essential for catalysis.
References
Ponce-Salvatierra, A., Wawrzyniak-Turek, K., Steuerwald, U., Höbartner, C. & Pena, V. Crystal structure of a DNA catalyst. Nature 529, 231–234 (2016).
Liu, H. et al. Crystal structure of an RNA-cleaving DNAzyme. Nat. Commun. 8, 2006 (2017).
Borggräfe, J. et al. Time-resolved structural analysis of an RNA-cleaving DNA catalyst. Nature 601, 144–149 (2022).
Santoro, S. W. & Joyce, G. F. A general purpose RNA-cleaving DNA enzyme. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 94, 4262–4266 (1997).
Wieruszewska, J. et al. The 8-17 DNAzyme can operate in a single active structure regardless of metal ion cofactor. Nat. Commun. 15, 4218 (2024).
Kim, H.-K., Rasnik, I., Liu, J., Ha, T. & Lu, Y. Dissecting metal ion–dependent folding and catalysis of a single DNAzyme. Nat. Chem. Biol. 3, 763–768 (2007).
Kim, H.-K. et al. Metal-dependent global folding and activity of the 8-17 DNAzyme studied by fluorescence resonance energy transfer. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 6896–6902 (2007).
Borggräfe, J., Gertzen, C. G. W., Viegas, A., Gohlke, H. & Etzkorn, M. The architecture of the 10‐23 DNAzyme and its implications for DNA‐mediated catalysis. FEBS J. 290, 2011–2021 (2023).
Acknowledgements
We thank the Jürgen Manchot Foundation for a research fellowship awarded to J.F.S. Support by the Heisenberg program to M.E. is gratefully acknowledged. Research in the M.E. laboratory is funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation)—project numbers: (466779182, 401425239) and the Volkswagen Foundation (Project: 9B796).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
J.F.S, J.B., and M.E. wrote the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Schmuck, J.F., Borggräfe, J. & Etzkorn, M. The dynamic world of the 8–17 DNAzyme. Nat Commun 15, 5145 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-49500-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-49500-w