[go: up one dir, main page]

 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (192)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = pegmatites

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
18 pages, 4260 KiB  
Article
Metallogenic Chronology and Prospecting Indication of Tiechanghe Granite and Polymetallic Molybdenum Mineralization Types in Jiulong Area, Western Sichuan, China
by Shuang Yang, Hongqi Tan, Zhongquan Li, Junliang Hu, Xinyan Wang and Daming Liu
Minerals 2024, 14(9), 909; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14090909 - 5 Sep 2024
Viewed by 286
Abstract
The Songpan–Ganzi Orogenic Belt (SGOB) is bounded by the South China, North China, and Qiangtang blocks and forms the eastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau. The Tiechanghe Granite is located at the junction of the southeast margin of the SGOB and the western [...] Read more.
The Songpan–Ganzi Orogenic Belt (SGOB) is bounded by the South China, North China, and Qiangtang blocks and forms the eastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau. The Tiechanghe Granite is located at the junction of the southeast margin of the SGOB and the western margin of the Yangtze Block. To elucidate the genetic relationship between the Tiechanghe Granite and the surrounding molybdenum deposits in Western Sichuan, in this study, we conducted zircon U-Pb and molybdenite Re-Os isotopic dating. The results indicate that the Tiechanghe Granite predominantly consists of monzogranite, with minor occurrences of syenogranite, while the molybdenum deposits are mainly found in skarn and quartz veins. The laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) zircon U-Pb ages of the Tiechanghe Granite range from 162.9 ± 0.7 Ma (MSWD = 0.31, n = 25) to 163.4 ± 0.6 Ma (MSWD = 0.85, n = 26), and the LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb age of the pegmatite veins is 164.1 ± 0.9 Ma (MSWD = 1.3, n = 19). These ages are consistent with the weighted average Re-Os age of the Ziershi molybdenite (160.3 ± 1.6 Ma, n = 2) within the error margins. These findings and previously obtained magmatic and metallogenic ages for the region suggest that a magmatic and mineralization event involving granite, molybdenum, tungsten, and copper occurred at around 162–164 Ma in the study area. This discovery broadens the exploration perspective for mineral resources in the Jiulong area of Western Sichuan and the entirety of Western Sichuan. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Mineral Geochemistry and Geochronology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location of study area in China (<b>a</b>) and geological map of the eastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau, showing the Longmenshan–Yanyuan foreland thrust zone (LYFTZ) and the distribution of tectonic domes (<b>b</b>). Tectonic units include the Yangtze block (YZB); the North China block (NCB); the Tibetan plateau (TP); the Songpan–Ganzi orogenic belt (SGOB); the Yidun paleozoic arc (YPA); and the Qiangtang–Changdu block (QCB). Major sutures and faults are the Jingshajiang suture zone (JSZ); the Ganzi–Litang suture zone (GLSZ); and the Xianshuihe sinistral strike-slip fault (XSF). Major metamorphic domes are the Taka dome (A); Jianglang dome (B); Changqiang dome (C); Qiasi dome (D); and Tangyang dome (E).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Geologic map of the Jiulong region and its adjacent areas in Western Sichuan (after the literature [<a href="#B10-minerals-14-00909" class="html-bibr">10</a>,<a href="#B11-minerals-14-00909" class="html-bibr">11</a>,<a href="#B12-minerals-14-00909" class="html-bibr">12</a>,<a href="#B13-minerals-14-00909" class="html-bibr">13</a>,<a href="#B14-minerals-14-00909" class="html-bibr">14</a>,<a href="#B15-minerals-14-00909" class="html-bibr">15</a>,<a href="#B17-minerals-14-00909" class="html-bibr">17</a>,<a href="#B21-minerals-14-00909" class="html-bibr">21</a>,<a href="#B23-minerals-14-00909" class="html-bibr">23</a>,<a href="#B24-minerals-14-00909" class="html-bibr">24</a>,<a href="#B25-minerals-14-00909" class="html-bibr">25</a>,<a href="#B26-minerals-14-00909" class="html-bibr">26</a>,<a href="#B27-minerals-14-00909" class="html-bibr">27</a>,<a href="#B28-minerals-14-00909" class="html-bibr">28</a>,<a href="#B29-minerals-14-00909" class="html-bibr">29</a>,<a href="#B30-minerals-14-00909" class="html-bibr">30</a>,<a href="#B31-minerals-14-00909" class="html-bibr">31</a>,<a href="#B32-minerals-14-00909" class="html-bibr">32</a>,<a href="#B33-minerals-14-00909" class="html-bibr">33</a>,<a href="#B34-minerals-14-00909" class="html-bibr">34</a>,<a href="#B35-minerals-14-00909" class="html-bibr">35</a>,<a href="#B36-minerals-14-00909" class="html-bibr">36</a>,<a href="#B37-minerals-14-00909" class="html-bibr">37</a>,<a href="#B38-minerals-14-00909" class="html-bibr">38</a>,<a href="#B39-minerals-14-00909" class="html-bibr">39</a>,<a href="#B42-minerals-14-00909" class="html-bibr">42</a>,<a href="#B43-minerals-14-00909" class="html-bibr">43</a>,<a href="#B44-minerals-14-00909" class="html-bibr">44</a>,<a href="#B45-minerals-14-00909" class="html-bibr">45</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Photographs of the contact relationship between the Mo-Cu ore body in quartz veins and schist (<b>a</b>) and distribution of molybdenite, malachite, and other minerals (<b>b</b>) in quartz veins. In (<b>a</b>), the white dashed line shows the dividing line between quartz veins and schist.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Petrographic characteristics of field photograph and photomicrograph (cross-polarized light) of the Tiechanghe monzonitic granite (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>) and syenite granite (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>) in the Jiulong region. In (<b>a</b>), the red dashed line shows the dividing line between monzonitic granite and pegmatite. Kfs—potassium feldspar, Mus—muscovite, Bt—biotite, Pl—plagioclase, Qtz—quartz.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Cathode luminescence (CL) images of zircons from the Tiechanghe granite–pegmatite and corresponding zircon U-Pb ages. The red numbers represent the spot number of the zircon in the figure, corresponding to <a href="#app1-minerals-14-00909" class="html-app">Table S1</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Zircon U-Pb concordia diagram and weighted average ages of the Tiechanghe Granite in the Jiulong region.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Rare-earth element chondrite-normalized patterns for the zircons from the Tiechanghe granite in the Jiulong area. Chondrite-normalized values are from Sun and McDonough (1989) [<a href="#B53-minerals-14-00909" class="html-bibr">53</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Mo-W-Cu metallogenic model in the Jiulong region, Western Sichuan, China.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 3726 KiB  
Article
Rapid Prediction of the Lithium Content in Plants by Combining Fractional-Order Derivative Spectroscopy and Wavelet Transform Analysis
by Shichao Cui, Guo Jiang and Yong Bai
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(16), 3071; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16163071 - 21 Aug 2024
Viewed by 577
Abstract
Quickly determining the metal content in plants and subsequently identifying geochemical anomalies can provide clues and guidance for predicting the location and scale of concealed ore bodies in vegetation-covered areas. Although visible, near-infrared and shortwave infrared (VNIR–SWIR) reflectance spectroscopy at wavelengths ranging from [...] Read more.
Quickly determining the metal content in plants and subsequently identifying geochemical anomalies can provide clues and guidance for predicting the location and scale of concealed ore bodies in vegetation-covered areas. Although visible, near-infrared and shortwave infrared (VNIR–SWIR) reflectance spectroscopy at wavelengths ranging from 400 to 2500 nm has been proven by many researchers to be a fast, accurate and nondestructive approach for estimating the contents of copper (Cu), lead (Pb), zinc (Zn) and other metal elements in plants, relatively few studies have been conducted on the estimation of lithium (Li) in plants. Therefore, the potential of applying VNIR–SWIR spectroscopy techniques for estimating the Li content in plants was explored in this study. The Jingerquan Li mining area in Hami, Xinjiang, China, was chosen. Three sampling lines were established near a pegmatite deposit and in a background region, canopy reflectance spectra were obtained for desert plants and Li contents were determined in the laboratory; then, quantitative relationships were established between nine different transformed spectra (including both integer and fractional orders) and the Li content was estimated using partial least squares regression (PLSR). The results showed that models constructed using high-order derivative spectra (with an order greater than or equal to 1) significantly outperformed those based on original and low-order derivative spectra (with an order less than 1). Notably, the model based on a 1.1-order derivative spectrum displayed the best performance. Furthermore, the performance of the model based on the two-layer wavelet coefficients of the 1.1-order derivative spectrum was further improved compared with that of the model based on only the 1.1-order derivative spectrum. The coefficient of determination (Rpre2) and the ratio of performance to deviation (RPD) for the validation set increased from 0.6977 and 1.7656 to 0.7044 and 1.8446, respectively, and the root mean square error (RMSEpre) decreased from 2.5735 to 2.4633 mg/kg. These results indicate that quickly and accurately estimating the Li content in plants via the proposed spectroscopic analysis technique is feasible and effective; however, appropriate spectral preprocessing methods should be selected before hyperspectral estimation models are constructed. Overall, the developed hybrid spectral transformation approach, which combines wavelet coefficients and derivative spectra, displayed excellent application potential for estimating the Li content in plants. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Remote Sensing in Geology, Geomorphology and Hydrology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Locations of the study area and sampling points.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Reflectance spectra of the plant samples.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Average spectral curves of plant samples in the calibration dataset based on different spectral transformations: (<b>a</b>) original reflectance spectra and (<b>b</b>) 0.2-, (<b>c</b>) 0.5-, (<b>d</b>) 0.8-, (<b>e</b>) 1-, (<b>f</b>) 1.1-, (<b>g</b>) 1.4-, (<b>h</b>) 1.7- and (<b>i</b>) 2-order derivative spectra. The solid black line and red shaded region in each subfigure represent the average reflectivity and the standard deviation of the spectra, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Correlation coefficients between different forms of transformation spectra and the Li content: (<b>a</b>) original, 1st-order and 2nd-order derivatives; (<b>b</b>) 0.2-, 0.5-, and 0.8-order derivatives; (<b>c</b>) 1.1-, 1.4-, and 1.7-order derivatives.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Scatter plots of the measured values in the validation set and the predicted values obtained with models constructed based on different transform spectra: (<b>a</b>) original; (<b>b</b>) 0.2-order; (<b>c</b>) 0.5-order; (<b>d</b>) 0.8-order; (<b>e</b>) 1st-order; (<b>f</b>) 1.1-order; (<b>g</b>) 1.4-order; (<b>h</b>) 1.7-order; and (<b>i</b>) 2nd-order derivative spectra.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Scatter plots of the measured values in the validation set and the predicted values obtained from the model constructed based on the second-layer wavelet coefficients of the 1.1-order derivative spectra.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 29396 KiB  
Article
Geochemistry, Mineralogy, and Geochronology of the NYF Pegmatites, Jiaolesayi, Northern Qaidam Basin, China
by Long Zhang, Xianzhi Pei, Yongbao Gao, Zuochen Li, Ming Liu, Yongkang Jing, Yuanwei Wang, Kang Chen, Nan Deng, Yi Zhang and Junwei Wu
Minerals 2024, 14(8), 805; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14080805 - 9 Aug 2024
Viewed by 465
Abstract
A significant amount of pegmatite has been discovered on the northwest margin of the Qaidam basin. Among this, the Jiaolesayi pegmatite, located in the northwestern margin of the Quanji Massif (Oulongbuluke micro-continent), shows rare element mineralization potential. Detailed field investigations, along with mineralogical, [...] Read more.
A significant amount of pegmatite has been discovered on the northwest margin of the Qaidam basin. Among this, the Jiaolesayi pegmatite, located in the northwestern margin of the Quanji Massif (Oulongbuluke micro-continent), shows rare element mineralization potential. Detailed field investigations, along with mineralogical, geochemical, and zircon U-Pb geochronological studies, were carried out on the pegmatite. The results show that the Jiaolesayi pegmatite is syenite, without obvious compositional zoning in the outcrop. It exhibits a peraluminous, high-K calc-alkaline nature with strong depletions in Eu, Sr, Ba, Ti, and P, and high contents of Nb, Ta, Y, Ti, U, Th, and heavy rare earth elements (HREEs), which are primarily concentrated in allanite-(Ce), euxenite-(Y), limonite, thorite, and zircon. The geochemical and mineralogical features of the syenite pegmatite indicate it belongs to the euxenite-type in the rare element class (REE) of the NYF family, with the characteristic accessory mineral being euxenite-(Y). Its 10,000 Ga/Al ratios (2.46 to 2.96), Zr + Nb + Ce + Y contents (998 to 6202 ppm), Y/Nb ratios (0.62 to 0.75), and Yb/Ta ratios (0.80 to 1.49) show an affinity with A1-type granite. Zircons from the syenite sample yielded a weighted mean 206Pb/238U age of 413.6 ± 1.4 Ma, while the elevated U and Th concentrations in the zircons and Th/U ratios (0.04 to 0.16) suggest the possible influence of hydrothermal processes in the late-stage fractional crystallization. In the context of the regional tectonic evolution, the syenite pegmatite may have formed from a basic alkaline magma derived from an OIB-like melt with minor crustal contamination, under the post-collisional extension setting. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>A</b>) Location of the study area (based on Google Earth image). (<b>B</b>) Geological map of the northwest margin of Quanji Massif. <a href="#minerals-14-00805-f002" class="html-fig">Figure 2</a> is shown as red rectangle. (<b>C</b>–<b>E</b>) Remote sensing images of pegmatites in Niubiziliang, Dachaigou, and Jiaolesayi (unpublished images from Xi’an Center of China Geological Survey, 2020).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Simplified geological map of Jiaolesayi.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Photographs and photomicrographs of pegmatite outcrops and rock samples from Jiaolesayi. (<b>A</b>) Previous reported Nb-Ta deposit, represented by the blue star in <a href="#minerals-14-00805-f002" class="html-fig">Figure 2</a>. (<b>B</b>) Newly discovered pegmatite, represented by the green star in <a href="#minerals-14-00805-f002" class="html-fig">Figure 2</a>, a person in the yellow circle as a scale. (<b>C</b>) Conjugated joints and brittle fractures developed in the flesh-red pegmatite. (<b>D</b>) Graphic structure and magnetite aggregates in the pegmatite. (<b>E</b>) Quartz veins intruded into the brecciated pegmatite. (<b>F</b>) Perthitic texture of perthite under a polarizing microscope. (<b>G</b>,<b>H</b>) Photomicrographs of graphic structure under a polarizing microscope. (<b>I</b>) Pegmatite with sericitization under a polarizing microscope. Abbreviations: Afs—alkali feldspar; Mc—mica; Or—orthoclase; Pl—plagioclase; Pth—perthite; Qz—quartz; Ser—sericite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Classification diagrams for the Jiaolesayi pegmatite. (<b>A</b>) Total alkalis (Na<sub>2</sub>O + K<sub>2</sub>O) vs. SiO<sub>2</sub> (TAS) diagram after Middlemost [<a href="#B47-minerals-14-00805" class="html-bibr">47</a>]; (<b>B</b>) (A/NK) vs. (A/CNK) diagram, solid lines are after Peccerillo [<a href="#B48-minerals-14-00805" class="html-bibr">48</a>]; (<b>C</b>) K<sub>2</sub>O vs. SiO<sub>2</sub> diagram after Rickwood [<a href="#B49-minerals-14-00805" class="html-bibr">49</a>], and (<b>D</b>) Chondrite-normalized REE patterns. (<b>E</b>) Primitive mantle-normalized trace element spider diagrams for the Jiaolesayi pegmatite samples. Normalizing data for the chondrite and primitive mantle are from Sun and McDonough [<a href="#B50-minerals-14-00805" class="html-bibr">50</a>]. Symbols: green diamond—syenite pegmatite samples.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>A</b>) Photomicrographs (cross-polarized light) and cathodoluminescence images of all tested zircons from Jiaolesayi pegmatite. (<b>B</b>) U-Pb Concordia diagram of sample D3301-1.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Photomicrographs under a reflecting microscope. (<b>A</b>) Typical subhedral euxenite-(Y) grain. (<b>B</b>) Short columnar euxenite-(Y) aggregates. (<b>C</b>) Thorite and anhedral euxenite-(Y). (<b>D</b>) Zircon, euxenite-(Y), and later-formed limonite in between. (<b>E</b>) A partial enlargement of Figure (<b>D</b>). (<b>F</b>) Image (<b>E</b>) in plane-polarized light. (<b>G</b>) An allanite-(Ce) grain. (<b>H</b>,<b>I</b>) Euhedral euxenite-(Y) grains and the EPMA test locations. (<b>J</b>) Limonite pseudomorph with residual pyrite in the core. (<b>K</b>,<b>L</b>) BSE images of euhedral euxenite-(Y) grains. Abbreviations: Aln-(Ce)—allanite-(Ce); Eux—euxenite-(Y); Lm—limonite; Py—pyrite; Thr—thorite; Zr—zircon.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>(<b>A</b>) Canonical discrimination analysis of AGM and EGM and (<b>B</b>) triangular discriminant graph after Škoda [<a href="#B55-minerals-14-00805" class="html-bibr">55</a>]; (<b>C</b>) FeO*/MgO vs. Zr + Nb + Ce + Y; (<b>D</b>) ternary plot of Nb-Y-Ce after Eby [<a href="#B57-minerals-14-00805" class="html-bibr">57</a>] and (<b>E</b>) Zr vs. 10,000 Ga/Al, A-type granite discrimination diagrams after Whalen [<a href="#B58-minerals-14-00805" class="html-bibr">58</a>]. Symbols: pink squares—AGM, grey squares—EGM from Škoda [<a href="#B55-minerals-14-00805" class="html-bibr">55</a>], orange crosses—EPMA data in this study (<a href="#app1-minerals-14-00805" class="html-app">Supplementary Table S3</a>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>(<b>A</b>) Plots of Nb/Yb vs. Th/Yb, after Wang [<a href="#B78-minerals-14-00805" class="html-bibr">78</a>], and (<b>B</b>) plots of Y/Nb vs. Yb/Ta, after Eby [<a href="#B56-minerals-14-00805" class="html-bibr">56</a>]. Black squares represent the three end-members in the MORB-OIB array. Abbreviations: OIB, oceanic island basalt; IAB, island arc basalt; N-MORB, normal middle oceanic ridge basalt; E-MORB, enriched middle oceanic ridge basalt; A1, A<sub>1</sub> type granite; A2, A<sub>2</sub> type granite.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 4575 KiB  
Article
Zircons from Eclogite-Associated Rocks of the Marun–Keu Complex, the Polar Urals: Trace Elements and U–Pb Dating
by Laysan Salimgaraeva, Aleksey Berezin, Sergey Sergeev, Nikolai Gubanov, Ekaterina Stetskaya and Sergey Skublov
Geosciences 2024, 14(8), 206; https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences14080206 - 2 Aug 2024
Viewed by 508
Abstract
The Marun–Keu complex plays a significant role in our understanding of the geological evolution of the Ural orogen; however, it remains poorly understood. This study aims to provide insights into the complex’s age, protolith composition, rock formation conditions, and its position in the [...] Read more.
The Marun–Keu complex plays a significant role in our understanding of the geological evolution of the Ural orogen; however, it remains poorly understood. This study aims to provide insights into the complex’s age, protolith composition, rock formation conditions, and its position in the geological history. The zircons from the host granitic gneiss are characterized by magmatic cores with an age of 473 Ma and metamorphic rims with an age of approximately 370 Ma. We suggest that the metamorphic rims were formed during eclogite metamorphism and that the metagranitoids hosting the eclogites experienced eclogite metamorphism simultaneously with the basic and ultrabasic rocks that are common in this area. Heterogeneous zircons were also isolated from the selvage of a pegmatite vein, in which four domains are distinguished, two to three of which can be identified within single grains, as follows: (1) igneous cores with an age of approximately 470 Ma and the geochemical characteristics of zircon crystallized in basic rocks; (2) zircons recrystallized during eclogite metamorphism with geochemical characteristics intermediate between those of the magmatic cores and true eclogitic zircon; (3) pegmatitic zircon, exhibiting the most sharply differentiated REE spectra of all four domains, characterized by a prominent positive Ce anomaly and a weakly expressed negative Eu anomaly; and (4) eclogitic zircon, observed in the form of veins and rims, superimposed in relation to the other three domains. The age of the latter three domains is within the error range and is estimated to be approximately 370 Ma. This indicates that the processes of eclogite metamorphism and the formation of pegmatites occurred at approximately the same time in the studied area. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Geochemistry)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Simplified tectonic scheme of the Urals after [<a href="#B3-geosciences-14-00206" class="html-bibr">3</a>]. MUF—Main Uralian Fault. 1—the Cis-Ural foredeep; 2—the Central Ural megazone; 3—the East Ural megazone; 4—the West Ural megazone; 5—the Tagil–Magnitogorsk megazone; 6—the Trans-Ural megazone. (<b>b</b>) The inset shows the overall geographic location of the Marun–Keu complex. (<b>c</b>) Geological map of the Marun–Keu complex [<a href="#B5-geosciences-14-00206" class="html-bibr">5</a>]. Key: 1—Quaternary; 2—Ordovician (?); 3—greenschists of the Nyarovey formation; 4—Marun–Keu series: gneisses, eclogites; 5—gneisses, granite gneisses; 6—granites with fluorite; 7—meta-rhyolites; 8—diorites, 9—gabbroids; 10—ultramafic rocks (Syum–Keu complex); 11—predominately eclogites; 12—glaucophane-hosted rocks; 13—quartz–graphite schists; 14—faults.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) Schematic sampling map. (<b>b</b>) General view of the peak 1040 area. (<b>c</b>) Selvage of a pegmatite vein at the contact with its host peridotites; white circle with sample number indicates the location from which sample 2209 was collected. (<b>d</b>) Contact between granitic gneisses and peridotites, cross-cut by a 1.5 m-wide pegmatite vein; white circle with sample number indicates the location from which sample 2218 was collected. The pegmatite vein was previously excavated for exploration purposes. (<b>e</b>) Migmatization zone in granitic gneisses indicated by a blue dashed line.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Microphotographs of thin section of granitic gneiss (sample 2218): (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>) transmitted polarized light; (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>) birefringence.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) CL images of zircons from granitic gneiss (sample 2218). Colored circles indicate the SIMS analytical spots, the numbers of which correspond to those in <a href="#app1-geosciences-14-00206" class="html-app">Table S2</a> and <a href="#geosciences-14-00206-f006" class="html-fig">Figure 6</a>. Blue circles indicate magmatic cores, while green circles indicate metamorphic rims. (<b>b</b>) BSE images of zircons from granitic gneiss (sample 2218) with labeled mineral inclusions. <span class="html-italic">Png</span>—<span class="html-italic">phengite</span>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>) CL images of zircons from the selvage of a pegmatite vein (sample 2209). The colored circles indicate the SIMS analytical spots, the numbers of which correspond to those in <a href="#app1-geosciences-14-00206" class="html-app">Table S3</a> and <a href="#geosciences-14-00206-f007" class="html-fig">Figure 7</a>. Blue circles indicate magmatic cores (first domain), green circles indicate recrystallized cores (second domain), navy blue circles indicate pegmatite zircon (third domain), and yellow circles indicate eclogite rims and veinlets (fourth domain). (<b>b</b>,<b>c</b>) BSE images of zircons from the selvage of a pegmatite vein (sample 2209) with labeled mineral inclusions. <span class="html-italic">Png</span>—<span class="html-italic">phengite</span>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Trace element compositions of zircons from granitic gneiss (sample 2218). (<b>a</b>) REE distribution patterns normalized to CI chondrite [<a href="#B33-geosciences-14-00206" class="html-bibr">33</a>]. (<b>b</b>–<b>d</b>) Co-variation diagrams of element pairs. The position of the analytical spots in different zircon domains is shown in <a href="#geosciences-14-00206-f004" class="html-fig">Figure 4</a> by circles of the corresponding colors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Trace element compositions of zircons from the selvage of a pegmatite vein (sample 2209). (<b>a</b>) REE distribution patterns normalized to CI chondrite [<a href="#B33-geosciences-14-00206" class="html-bibr">33</a>]. (<b>b</b>–<b>d</b>) Co-variation diagrams of element pairs. The position of the analytical spots in different zircon domains is shown in <a href="#geosciences-14-00206-f005" class="html-fig">Figure 5</a> by circles of the corresponding colors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Geochemical discriminant diagrams for zircon after [<a href="#B35-geosciences-14-00206" class="html-bibr">35</a>]. Blue markers indicate the positions of zircon cores from the selvage of the pegmatite vein (sample 2209).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Concordia plot for zircons (<b>a</b>) from granitic gneiss (sample 2218) and (<b>b</b>) from the selvage of a pegmatite vein (sample 2209). Error ellipses are at 2σ confidence. The blue ellipses represent the concordia age and error. Decay constant errors are included.</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 8347 KiB  
Article
Geochronology, Geochemistry, and In Situ Sr-Nd-Hf Isotopic Compositions of a Tourmaline-Bearing Leucogranite in Eastern Tethyan Himalaya: Implications for Tectonic Setting and Rare Metal Mineralization
by Yangchen Drolma, Kaijun Li, Yubin Li, Jinshu Zhang, Chengye Yang, Gen Zhang, Ruoming Li and Duo Liu
Minerals 2024, 14(8), 755; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14080755 - 26 Jul 2024
Viewed by 485
Abstract
Himalayan leucogranite is an excellent target for understanding the orogenic process of the India–Asia collision, but its origin and tectonic significance are still under debate. An integrated study of geochronology, geochemistry, and in situ Sr-Nd-Hf isotopes was conducted for a tourmaline-bearing leucogranite in [...] Read more.
Himalayan leucogranite is an excellent target for understanding the orogenic process of the India–Asia collision, but its origin and tectonic significance are still under debate. An integrated study of geochronology, geochemistry, and in situ Sr-Nd-Hf isotopes was conducted for a tourmaline-bearing leucogranite in the eastern Tethyan Himalaya using LA-ICP-MS, X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy, and ICP-MS and LA-MC-ICP-MS, respectively. LA-ICP-MS U-Pb dating of zircon and monazite showed that it was emplaced at ~19 Ma. The leucogranite had high SiO2 and Al2O3 contents ranging from 73.16 to 73.99 wt.% and 15.05 to 15.24 wt.%, respectively. It was characterized by a high aluminum saturation index (1.14–1.19) and Rb/Sr ratio (3.58–6.35), which is characteristic of S-type granite. The leucogranite was enriched in light rare-earth elements (LREEs; e.g., La and Ce) and large ion lithophile elements (LILEs; e.g., Rb, K, and Pb) and depleted in heavy rare-earth elements (e.g., Tm, Yb, and Lu) and high field strength elements (HFSEs; e.g., Nb, Zr, and Ti). It was characterized by high I Sr (t) (0.7268–0.7281) and low ε Nd (t) (−14.6 to −13.2) and ε Hf (t) (−12.6 to −9.47), which was consistent with the isotopic characteristics of the Higher Himalayan Sequence. Petrogenetically, the origin of the leucogranite is best explained by the decompression-induced muscovite dehydration melting of an ancient metapelitic source within the Higher Himalayan Sequence during regional extension due to the movement of the South Tibetan Detachment System (STDS). The significantly high lithium and beryllium contents of the leucogranite and associated pegmatite suggest that Himalayan leucogranites possess huge potential for lithium and beryllium exploration. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Geological sketch map of the Himalayas showing the distribution of Himalayan leucogranites (after [<a href="#B5-minerals-14-00755" class="html-bibr">5</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Simplified geological map of the Luozha tourmaline-bearing leucogranite (after [<a href="#B25-minerals-14-00755" class="html-bibr">25</a>]). Mineral abbreviations [<a href="#B26-minerals-14-00755" class="html-bibr">26</a>]: And, andalusite; Grt, garnet; St, staurolite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Representative field photographs and photomicrographs of the LTLG and spodumene-bearing pegmatites. (<b>a</b>) Field photograph showing oriented tourmalines of the LTLG; (<b>b</b>) Photomicrograph of the LTLG; (<b>c</b>) Field photograph of the spodumene-bearing pegmatite and (<b>d</b>) Photomicrograph of the spodumene-bearing pegmatite. Mineral abbreviations [<a href="#B26-minerals-14-00755" class="html-bibr">26</a>]: Bt, biotite; Kfs, K-feldspar; Ms, muscovite; Pl, plagioclase; Qz, quartz; Spd, Spodumene; Tur, tourmaline.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>U-Pb dating results of the LTLG. (<b>a</b>) Cathodoluminescence images for representative zircons from the LTLG; (<b>b</b>) U-Pb zircon concordia diagram of the LTLG; Tera–Wasserburg concordia diagram for zircons (<b>c</b>) and monazites (<b>d</b>) of the LTLG. The red circle indicate the location of U-Pb dating analysis.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Plots of (<b>a</b>) SiO<sub>2</sub> vs. (Na<sub>2</sub>O+K<sub>2</sub>O) (after [<a href="#B39-minerals-14-00755" class="html-bibr">39</a>]), (<b>b</b>) SiO<sub>2</sub> vs. (Na<sub>2</sub>O+K<sub>2</sub>O-CaO) (after [<a href="#B40-minerals-14-00755" class="html-bibr">40</a>]), (<b>c</b>) SiO<sub>2</sub> vs. K<sub>2</sub>O (after [<a href="#B41-minerals-14-00755" class="html-bibr">41</a>]); and (<b>d</b>) A/CNK vs. A/NK (after [<a href="#B42-minerals-14-00755" class="html-bibr">42</a>]) for the LTLG.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) REE patterns and (<b>b</b>) Spidergrams of the LTLG. The values of chondrite and primitive mantle are from McDonough and Sun [<a href="#B43-minerals-14-00755" class="html-bibr">43</a>]. The data of S-type (blue field) and highly fractional (green field) leucogranites from the Ramba area are from Liu et al. [<a href="#B12-minerals-14-00755" class="html-bibr">12</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Plots of (<b>a</b>) in situ and whole rock Sr-Nd isotopic data and (<b>b</b>) Zircon Hf isotopic data of the LTLG.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Diagrams of (<b>a</b>) (Zr + Nb + Ce + Y) vs. FeO*/MgO (after [<a href="#B48-minerals-14-00755" class="html-bibr">48</a>]); (<b>b</b>) (Zr + Nb + Ce + Y) vs. (Na<sub>2</sub>O + K<sub>2</sub>O)/CaO (after [<a href="#B48-minerals-14-00755" class="html-bibr">48</a>]); (<b>c</b>) Rb vs. Th and (<b>d</b>) Rb vs. Y (after [<a href="#B50-minerals-14-00755" class="html-bibr">50</a>]) for the LTLG. The data of S-type granites from the Interview River Suite are from Chappell [<a href="#B45-minerals-14-00755" class="html-bibr">45</a>]. The data of S-type leucogranites from the Ramba area are from Liu et al. [<a href="#B12-minerals-14-00755" class="html-bibr">12</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Diagrams of (<b>a</b>) Nb/Ta vs. Zr/Hf and (<b>b</b>) Rb/Sr vs. (La/Yb)<sub>N</sub> for the LTLG. The data of S-type and highly fractional leucogranites from the Ramba area are from Liu et al. [<a href="#B12-minerals-14-00755" class="html-bibr">12</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Plots of (<b>a</b>) (Na<sub>2</sub>O + K<sub>2</sub>O + TiO<sub>2</sub> + TFeO + MgO) vs. (Na<sub>2</sub>O + K<sub>2</sub>O)/(TiO<sub>2</sub> + TFeO + MgO) (after [<a href="#B60-minerals-14-00755" class="html-bibr">60</a>]), (<b>b</b>) (CaO + TiO<sub>2</sub> + TFeO + MgO) vs. CaO/(TiO<sub>2</sub> + TFeO + MgO) (after [<a href="#B60-minerals-14-00755" class="html-bibr">60</a>]), (<b>c</b>) Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/TiO<sub>2</sub> vs. CaO/TiO<sub>2</sub> (after [<a href="#B61-minerals-14-00755" class="html-bibr">61</a>]); and (<b>d</b>) Rb/Sr vs. Rb/Ba (after [<a href="#B61-minerals-14-00755" class="html-bibr">61</a>]) for the LTLG. MP, metapelites; MGW, metagreywackes; AMP, amphibolites.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Plots of (<b>a</b>) Ba vs. Rb/Sr and (<b>b</b>) Sr vs. Rb/Sr (after [<a href="#B62-minerals-14-00755" class="html-bibr">62</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Plots of <b>ε<sub>Nd</sub></b>(t) vs. <b>I<sub>Sr</sub></b>(t) for the LTLG. Fields of Gangdese batholith, Higher Himalayan Sequence, and Lesser Himalayan Sequence are from Wu et al. [<a href="#B5-minerals-14-00755" class="html-bibr">5</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Plots of (<b>a</b>) Rb/Sr vs. Li; (<b>b</b>) Rb/Sr vs. Be; (<b>c</b>) Zr/Hf vs. Li; (<b>d</b>) Zr/Hf vs. Be; (<b>e</b>) Nb/Ta vs. Li; and (<b>f</b>) Nb/Ta vs. Be for the LTLG.</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 4452 KiB  
Article
Crystallization Sequence of the Spodumene-Rich Alijó Pegmatite (Northern Portugal) and Related Metasomatism on Its Host Rock
by Idoia Garate-Olave, Encarnación Roda-Robles, Nora Santos-Loyola, Tania Martins, Alexandre Lima and Jon Errandonea-Martin
Minerals 2024, 14(7), 701; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14070701 - 9 Jul 2024
Viewed by 719
Abstract
The Barroso–Alvão region is an excellent setting for studying Li mineralization associated with granitic pegmatites and developing Li exploration techniques. Among the distinguished pegmatite types in this pegmatite field, the spodumene-bearing dyke from Alijó is a representative example of an Iberian Li–Cs–Ta (LCT) [...] Read more.
The Barroso–Alvão region is an excellent setting for studying Li mineralization associated with granitic pegmatites and developing Li exploration techniques. Among the distinguished pegmatite types in this pegmatite field, the spodumene-bearing dyke from Alijó is a representative example of an Iberian Li–Cs–Ta (LCT) pegmatite currently under exploitation. In this work, we examine the internal evolution of the Alijó dyke and its external metasomatic effect on the surrounding metasediments, contributing to lithium exploration techniques. Electron microprobe analyses provided clues about the crystallization conditions and the degree of differentiation of the pegmatitic melt, whereas the external metasomatism induced by the spodumene-bearing pegmatite was studied through whole-rock geochemistry. The obtained results indicate that the primary crystallization of the studied dyke likely occurred at temperatures between 450–500 °C, with emplacement at shallow crustal levels of about 2–3 kbar. The high concentrations of trace elements such as Li, Cs, Rb, Be, Sn, Nb, Ta, Ge, U, and Tl in the pegmatitic melt suggests high availability of these elements, allowing their partitioning into an early exsolved fluid phase. The exsolution of this fluid phase, subtracting components such as F and B, from the pegmatitic melt would cause a significant undercooling of the melt. Moreover, the interaction of this expelled fluid with the country rock generated a metasomatic overprint in the surrounding metasedimentary host rocks. The metasomatic effect in Alijó is strongly influenced by the nature of the host metasediments, with a significantly higher grade of metasomatism observed in pelitic (mica-rich) samples compared to psammitic (mica-poor) samples collected at same distances from the dyke. The greisen developed close to the pegmatite contact reflects this metasomatic signature, characterized by the mobilization of at least B, F, Li, Rb, Cs, Sn, Be, Nb, Ta, and Tl. We cautiously suggest that whole rock Li concentrations greater than 300 ppm, combined with a minimum value of 1000 ppm for the sum of B, F, Li, Rb, Cs, and Sn in pelitic metasediments of Barroso–Alvão, may be indicative of a mineralized pegmatite in this region. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Geological map of the Iberian Massif (IM; excluding the Ossa-Morena and South Portuguese zones), highlighting the Variscan Igneous Rocks (VIR). (<b>b</b>) Regional geological map of the Barroso-Alvão region: I: post-D3 biotite granites; II: syn-D3 biotite granites; III: syn-D3 biotite &gt; muscovite granites; IV: syn-D3 two-mica granites; V: mica-schist and metagreywackes (lower parautochthon); VI: mica-schist/phyllites and quartzites (upper parautochthon); VII: dark schist and quartzites (upper parautochthon): Star: location of studied dyke. Based on [<a href="#B27-minerals-14-00701" class="html-bibr">27</a>,<a href="#B31-minerals-14-00701" class="html-bibr">31</a>,<a href="#B32-minerals-14-00701" class="html-bibr">32</a>,<a href="#B33-minerals-14-00701" class="html-bibr">33</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) Layered structure in an aplitic sample alternating quartz + plagioclase and plagioclase-rich layers. (<b>b</b>) Hand sample with a pegmatitic texture, exhibiting combed feldspars marked with dashed lines. (<b>c</b>) Representative outcrop of the pelitic host metasediments. (<b>d</b>) Field photograph of an outcrop showing psammitic layers in a mainly pelitic lithology.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>a</b>) Microphotograph of combed micas growing from the contact with the host rock marked by dashed line. (<b>b</b>) Euhedral spodumene crystals of up to 8 mm. (<b>c</b>) Eucryptite (Ecp) (yellowish) and cookeite (Ckt) (uncolored) replacing spodumene (Spd) crystals, with some relicts of Spd. (<b>d</b>) Anhedral crystal of montebrasite (Msb) with a slight twinning.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) Binary Si vs. P + Al diagram of K-feldspar and plagioclase from the Alijó pegmatite. (<b>b</b>) Binary Mg − Li vs. Fe + Mn + Ti + Al<sup>VI</sup> diagram of analyzed micas (based on [<a href="#B48-minerals-14-00701" class="html-bibr">48</a>]). (<b>c</b>) Ternary Na + K vs. Ca vs. vacancy (X site) classification diagram of analyzed tourmaline crystals. (<b>d</b>) Quadrilateral Mn/(Mn + Fe) vs. Ta/(Ta + Nb) plot of analyzed CGM from the Alijó pegmatite. Analyses of CGM from other localities from BA are also shown in green for comparison (data from [<a href="#B44-minerals-14-00701" class="html-bibr">44</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>) Microphotograph of a pelitic (mica-rich) host rock sample, with a marked original slaty cleavage and a well-developed crenulation cleavage. (<b>b</b>) Alternating psammitic (quartz-rich) and pelitic layers in a psammitic host rock. (<b>c</b>) Microphotograph of an intermediate sample, with a greater mica proportion compared with the psammitic samples. (<b>d</b>) Porphyroblast of biotite (Bt) from the host rock. (<b>e</b>) Small tourmaline (Tur) crystals formed in the pelitic layers of the host rocks relatively close to the pegmatite. (<b>f</b>) Representative microphotograph of a greisen sample.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) Multicationic [B] vs. [A] diagram from [<a href="#B51-minerals-14-00701" class="html-bibr">51</a>] modified by [<a href="#B52-minerals-14-00701" class="html-bibr">52</a>], showing compositions of the selected aplite-pegmatite, greisen, and host rocks from Alijó. (<b>b</b>) Bivariate plot displaying F vs. Li (logarithmic) of the same set of samples (Iberian aplite-pegmatites, S1 granites, and S2 granites also shown for comparison; data taken from [<a href="#B13-minerals-14-00701" class="html-bibr">13</a>]. (<b>c</b>) Nb/Ta vs. K/Rb diagram (logarithmic) of the same three types of studied rocks. (<b>d</b>) Spider plots of the studied spodumene-pegmatite, host metasediments, and greisen normalized to the upper continental crust (UCC; [<a href="#B53-minerals-14-00701" class="html-bibr">53</a>]). (<b>e</b>) Classification diagram of siliciclastic sediments [<a href="#B54-minerals-14-00701" class="html-bibr">54</a>], showing compositions of the studied metasedimentary host rocks. Compositions of the Neoproterozoic Iberian Average Shale (NIBAS; [<a href="#B55-minerals-14-00701" class="html-bibr">55</a>]), average of North-Central Iberian Zone (N-CIZ) slates [<a href="#B56-minerals-14-00701" class="html-bibr">56</a>], and Post Archean Australian Shale (PAAS; [<a href="#B57-minerals-14-00701" class="html-bibr">57</a>]) are also displayed for comparison. (<b>f</b>) Chondrite-normalized [<a href="#B58-minerals-14-00701" class="html-bibr">58</a>] REE diagrams of the host metasediments.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Binary diagrams showing (<b>a</b>) lithium, (<b>b</b>) rubidium, (<b>c</b>) cesium, and (<b>d</b>) tin concentrations in the studied host metasediments displayed relative to the distance from the dyke (*), i.e., the distance from the dyke divided by the thickness of the dyke (range of non-metasomatized control samples also displayed in grey for comparison).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Temperature vs. pressure phase diagram for Li-aluminosilicates (modified from [<a href="#B69-minerals-14-00701" class="html-bibr">69</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Binary SiO<sub>2</sub>/Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> vs. Li (<b>a</b>) and SiO<sub>2</sub>/Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> vs. B + F + Li + Cs + Rb + Sn (<b>b</b>) diagrams that show geochemical differences between mica-rich (pelitic) and mica-poor (psammitic) metasedimentary host rocks.</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 5675 KiB  
Article
Genesis of the Ke’eryin Two-Mica Monzogranite in the Ke’eryin Pegmatite-Type Lithium Ore Field, Songpan–Garze Orogenic Belt: Evidence from Lithium Isotopes
by Xin Li, Hongzhang Dai, Shanbao Liu, Denghong Wang, Fan Huang, Jinhua Qin, Yan Sun and Haiyang Zhu
Minerals 2024, 14(7), 687; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14070687 - 29 Jun 2024
Viewed by 685
Abstract
Previous studies on the Ke’eryin pegmatite-type lithium ore field in the Songpan–Ganzi Orogenic Belt have explored the characteristics of the parent rock but have not precisely determined its magma source area. This uncertainty limits our understanding of the regularity of lithium ore formation [...] Read more.
Previous studies on the Ke’eryin pegmatite-type lithium ore field in the Songpan–Ganzi Orogenic Belt have explored the characteristics of the parent rock but have not precisely determined its magma source area. This uncertainty limits our understanding of the regularity of lithium ore formation in this region. In this study, to address the issue of the precise source area of the parent rock of lithium mineralization, a detailed analysis of the Li isotope composition of the ore-forming parent rock (Ke’eryin two-mica monzogranite) and its potential source rocks (Triassic Xikang Group metamorphic rocks) was conducted. The δ7Li values of the Ke’eryin two-mica monzogranite, Xikang Group metasandstone, and Xikang Group mica schist are −3.3–−0.7‰ (average: −1.43‰), +0.1–+6.9‰ (average: +3.83‰), and −9.1–0‰ (average: −5.00‰), respectively. The Li isotopic composition of the Ke’eryin two-mica monzogranite is notably different from the metasandstone and aligns more closely with the mica schist, suggesting that the mica schist is its primary source rock. The heavy Li isotopic composition of the two-mica monzogranite compared to the mica schist may have resulted from the separation of the peritectic garnet into the residual phase during the biotite dehydration melting process. Moreover, the low-temperature weathering of the source rocks may have been the main factor leading to the lighter lithium isotope composition of the Xikang Group mica schist compared to the metasandstone. Further analysis suggests that continental crust weathering and crustal folding and thickening play crucial roles in the enrichment of lithium during multi-cycle orogenies. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Sketch map of regional tectonics (<b>a</b>) (modified from [<a href="#B4-minerals-14-00687" class="html-bibr">4</a>,<a href="#B46-minerals-14-00687" class="html-bibr">46</a>]) and simplified geological map of the Ke’eryin ore field (<b>b</b>) (modified from [<a href="#B66-minerals-14-00687" class="html-bibr">66</a>]) (age data for granites of the Ke’eryin composite pluton and the Jiada deposit [<a href="#B15-minerals-14-00687" class="html-bibr">15</a>], age data for the Lijiagou deposit [<a href="#B13-minerals-14-00687" class="html-bibr">13</a>,<a href="#B67-minerals-14-00687" class="html-bibr">67</a>], age data for the Dangba deposit [<a href="#B14-minerals-14-00687" class="html-bibr">14</a>]). 1: Upper Triassic flysch; 2: Neoproterozoic–Paleozoic strata of the Yangtze craton; 3: pegmatite-type lithium ore fields; 4: suture zone; 5: thrust; 6: strike–slip fault; NCB: North China Block; NQLT: North Qilian Thrust; EKL–QDM–QL: East Kunlun–Qaidam–Qilian terrane; QT–CD: Qiangtang–Chamdo terrane; WKL: West Kunlun terrane; LMST: Longmenshan thrust; YZB: Yangtze Block; EKL–ANMQS: East Kunlun–Anyemaqen suture zone; JSSZ: Jinshajiang suture zone.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Photographs and photomicrographs of metasandstone and mica schist of the Triassic Xikang Group and the Ke’eryin two-mica monzogranite. (<b>a</b>) field photograph of metasandstone; (<b>b</b>) field photograph of mica schist; (<b>c</b>) field photograph of two-mica monzogranite; (<b>d</b>) hand specimen photograph of metasandstone; (<b>e</b>) hand specimen photograph of mica schist; (<b>f</b>) hand specimen photograph of two-mica monzogranite; (<b>g</b>,<b>j</b>) photomicrographs of metasandstone (CPL); (<b>h</b>,<b>k</b>) photomicrographs of mica schist (PPL); (<b>i</b>) photomicrographs of two-mica monzogranite (PPL); (<b>l</b>) photomicrographs of mica schist (PPL) and metasandstone (CPL) near the pegmatite veins; Qtz, quartz; Bi, biotite; Ms, muscovite; Kfs, K-feldspar; Pl, plagioclase; Grt, garnet; Tur, tourmaline; Amp, amphibole.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The Upper Continental Crust (UCC)-normalized trace element patterns (<b>a</b>) and Chondrite-normalized rare earth element patterns (<b>b</b>) for metasandstone and mica schist of the Triassic Xikang Group and the Ke’eryin two-mica monzogranite (normalization values of the UCC [<a href="#B74-minerals-14-00687" class="html-bibr">74</a>] and the chondrite [<a href="#B77-minerals-14-00687" class="html-bibr">77</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Lithium isotopic compositions of the metasandstone and mica schist of the Triassic Xikang Group and the Ke’eryin two-mica monzogranite (data for mantle rocks [<a href="#B30-minerals-14-00687" class="html-bibr">30</a>,<a href="#B78-minerals-14-00687" class="html-bibr">78</a>,<a href="#B79-minerals-14-00687" class="html-bibr">79</a>,<a href="#B80-minerals-14-00687" class="html-bibr">80</a>,<a href="#B81-minerals-14-00687" class="html-bibr">81</a>]; data for the lower and middle crust rocks [<a href="#B82-minerals-14-00687" class="html-bibr">82</a>]; data for the upper crust rocks [<a href="#B83-minerals-14-00687" class="html-bibr">83</a>,<a href="#B84-minerals-14-00687" class="html-bibr">84</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Sr-Nd isotopic compositions of the Ke’eryin two-mica monzogranite (data for the Western Yangtze Craton [<a href="#B23-minerals-14-00687" class="html-bibr">23</a>,<a href="#B97-minerals-14-00687" class="html-bibr">97</a>,<a href="#B98-minerals-14-00687" class="html-bibr">98</a>,<a href="#B99-minerals-14-00687" class="html-bibr">99</a>,<a href="#B100-minerals-14-00687" class="html-bibr">100</a>]; data for the Triassic Xikang Group [<a href="#B23-minerals-14-00687" class="html-bibr">23</a>,<a href="#B24-minerals-14-00687" class="html-bibr">24</a>,<a href="#B25-minerals-14-00687" class="html-bibr">25</a>,<a href="#B96-minerals-14-00687" class="html-bibr">96</a>,<a href="#B101-minerals-14-00687" class="html-bibr">101</a>]; data for the Ke’eryin two-mica monzogranite [<a href="#B22-minerals-14-00687" class="html-bibr">22</a>,<a href="#B24-minerals-14-00687" class="html-bibr">24</a>,<a href="#B96-minerals-14-00687" class="html-bibr">96</a>]; data for the Jiajika two-mica granite [<a href="#B101-minerals-14-00687" class="html-bibr">101</a>]; data for the Zhawulong muscovite granite [<a href="#B20-minerals-14-00687" class="html-bibr">20</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Zircon Hf isotopic compositions of the Ke’eryin two-mica monzogranite (data for the Triassic Xikang Group [<a href="#B96-minerals-14-00687" class="html-bibr">96</a>,<a href="#B102-minerals-14-00687" class="html-bibr">102</a>,<a href="#B103-minerals-14-00687" class="html-bibr">103</a>,<a href="#B104-minerals-14-00687" class="html-bibr">104</a>]; data for the Ke’eryin two-mica monzogranite [<a href="#B13-minerals-14-00687" class="html-bibr">13</a>,<a href="#B22-minerals-14-00687" class="html-bibr">22</a>,<a href="#B97-minerals-14-00687" class="html-bibr">97</a>]; data for the Jiajika two-mica granite [<a href="#B25-minerals-14-00687" class="html-bibr">25</a>]; data for the Zhawulong muscovite granite [<a href="#B20-minerals-14-00687" class="html-bibr">20</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Schematic diagram for the rock- and ore-forming processes of the Ke’eryin pegmatite-type lithium ore field (Li isotope data for pegmatites [<a href="#B75-minerals-14-00687" class="html-bibr">75</a>]).</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 2190 KiB  
Article
Quantification of Feldspar and Quartz Nucleation Delay in a Hydrous Peraluminous Granitic Melt
by Maude Bilodeau and Don R. Baker
Minerals 2024, 14(6), 611; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14060611 - 15 Jun 2024
Viewed by 583
Abstract
A modified model based on classical nucleation theory was applied to a natural hydrous peraluminous pegmatite composition and tested against crystallization experiments in order to further investigate the quantification of nucleation delay in felsic melts. Crystallization experiments were performed in a piston-cylinder apparatus [...] Read more.
A modified model based on classical nucleation theory was applied to a natural hydrous peraluminous pegmatite composition and tested against crystallization experiments in order to further investigate the quantification of nucleation delay in felsic melts. Crystallization experiments were performed in a piston-cylinder apparatus at 630 MPa and temperatures between 650 and 1000 °C for durations ranging from 0.3 to 211 h. Experimental run products were investigated by scanning electron microscopy paired with energy dispersive spectroscopy analyses of both crystalline and quenched liquid phases, the results of which were compared to an established theoretical nucleation delay model from the literature. The experiments showed good agreement (within a factor of 5) with the model for quartz, while it showed moderate agreement (within a factor of 10) with the model for sodic feldspar. Other crystals also nucleated, demonstrating abundant features of disequilibrium. Our research further demonstrates the potential of the model to predict nucleation delay, showing promising results for the quantification of the nucleation delay of quartz and feldspar in natural felsic melts, thus adding to previously published studies on hydrous, metaluminous, felsic melts and dry basaltic melts. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Backscattered electron images of the melting experimental run products, with the contrast and brightness adjusted in ImageJ; 1000 °C, 630 MPa, 110 h; Mullite (Mul) and corundum (Crn) crystals nucleating homogeneously; close-up of mullite occurring in a cluster and following the outline of a remnant larger-scaled crystal fragment.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Backscattered electron images of the crystallization experimental run products with enhanced contrast and brightness: (<b>a</b>) 1000 °C, 630 MPa, 44 h; mullite and corundum crystals displaying rhombic and anhedral habits, respectively. Small oxides nucleated both homogeneously and heterogeneously with mullite and corundum crystals. Most of the capsule is occupied by the remaining melt, which becomes glass after being quenched. (<b>b</b>) 900 °C, 630 MPa, 5 h; mullite crystals randomly nucleating homogeneously in the entire capsule. (<b>c</b>) 900 °C, 630 MPa, 5 h; mullite crystals randomly nucleating homogeneously in the entire capsule; close-up of a radial aggregate of mullite crystals.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Backscattered electron images of the crystallization experimental run products with enhanced contrast and brightness: (<b>a</b>) 850 °C, 630 MPa, 5 h; mullite crystals displaying rhombic habits and corundum crystals displaying anhedral, elongated or rounded habits. Iron oxides nucleated heterogeneously at the edge of the corundum crystals. (<b>b</b>) 850 °C, 630 MPa, 5 h; close-up of the halos surrounding corundum crystals and iron oxides. (<b>c</b>) 850 °C, 630 MPa, 115 h; long acicular corundum crystals nucleating parallel to the capsule wall and euhedral quartz (Qz) crystals nucleating on the capsule wall.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Backscattered electron images of the crystallization experimental run products, with the contrast and brightness, increased in ImageJ: (<b>a</b>) 800 °C, 630 MPa, 120 h; Skeletal spherulite of plagioclase surrounded by epoxy-filled vesicles; the crack between the spherulite and the capsule wall (black region) formed during quenching or sample preparation for analysis. Mullite crystals occur as radial aggregates. (<b>b</b>) 800 °C, 630 MPa, 120 h; isolated skeletal crystal of plagioclase (Pl) surrounded by epoxy-filled vesicles. Elongated anhedral corundum crystals are surrounded by halos previously described. (<b>c</b>) 800 °C, 630 MPa, 120 h; close-up showing the order of crystallization of the crystalline phases, with rounded irregular quartz enclosing corundum, mullite and iron oxides.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Backscattered electron images of the crystallization experimental run products, with the contrast and brightness enhanced; 750 °C, 630 MPa, 28 h: (<b>a</b>) Spherulites of the unknown phase (petalite?) nucleating homogeneously in the melt, enclosing mullite and corundum crystals; (<b>b</b>) Fan, bowtie and spherical spherulites of the unknown phase (petalite?) nucleating both homogenously and heterogeneously around corundum crystals and on the capsule wall; (<b>c</b>) Rounded irregular quartz crystals nucleating around elongated and fibrous corundum crystals. Iron oxides nucleate both homogeneously and heterogeneously.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Backscattered electron images of the crystallization experimental run products, with the contrast and brightness enhanced; 650 °C, 630 MPa, 115 h: (<b>a</b>) Aggregate of quartz (identified), plagioclase, mullite, corundum, and the unknown phase crystals (petalite?) in melt. (<b>b</b>) Corundum surrounded by halos and the unknown phase (petalite?).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>(<b>a</b>) Comparison of nucleation delay experiments during crystallization with theoretical calculations as discussed in the text. The nucleation delay curve for mullite was calculated using thermodynamic data for sillimanite. (<b>b</b>) Phase equilibria of the bulk composition studied based upon melting experiments. Note that the experiment at 900 °C contained a few quartz crystals that were interpreted to be residual and not in equilibrium with the melt.</p>
Full article ">
12 pages, 253 KiB  
Article
Accurate Boron Determination in Tourmaline by Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry: An Insight into the Boron–Mannitol Complex-Based Wet Acid Digestion Method
by Xijuan Tan, Yonggang Feng, Ruili Zhou, Denghong Wang, Ting Liang and Yan Wang
Molecules 2024, 29(11), 2701; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29112701 - 6 Jun 2024
Viewed by 578
Abstract
Tourmaline, a boron-bearing mineral, has been extensively applied as a geothermometer, provenance indicator, and fluid-composition recorder in geological studies. In this paper, the decomposition capability of an HF-HNO3–mannitol mixture for a tourmaline sample was investigated in detail for the first time, [...] Read more.
Tourmaline, a boron-bearing mineral, has been extensively applied as a geothermometer, provenance indicator, and fluid-composition recorder in geological studies. In this paper, the decomposition capability of an HF-HNO3–mannitol mixture for a tourmaline sample was investigated in detail for the first time, and a wet acid digestion method based on the boron–mannitol complex for accurate boron determination in tourmaline by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) was proposed. With a digestion temperature of 140 °C, tourmaline samples of 25 mg (±0.5 mg) can be completely decomposed by a ternary mixture, which consisted of 0.6 mL of HF, 0.6 mL of HNO3, and 0.7 mL of 2% mannitol (wt.), via a continuous heating treatment of 36 h. Following gentle evaporation at 100 °C, the sample residues were re-dissolved using 2 mL of 40% HNO3 solution (wt.) and diluted to about 2.0 × 105-fold by a two-step method using 2% HNO3 solution (wt.). The boron contents in a batch of parallel tourmaline samples were then determined by ICP-MS, and results showed that the boron concentration levels were in a range of 3.20–3.44% with determination RSDs less than 4.0% (n = 5). It was found that the boron concentrations obtained at the mass of 10B were comparable with results from the measurements at the mass of 11B. This revealed that the usage of 2% mannitol with a quantity as high as 0.7 mL in this developed approach did not exhibit significant effect on the quantification accuracy of boron at the mass of 11B. It was also found that the processes including fluoride-forming prevention and fluoride decomposition deteriorated the boron-reserving efficiency of mannitol for tourmaline, causing the averaged boron contents to vary from 2.25% to 3.57% (n = 5). Furthermore, the stability of the boron–mannitol complex under 185 °C by applying the laboratory high pressure-closed digestion method was evaluated, which showed that there existed a 60.36% loss of boron compared to that under 140 °C by using this proposed approach. For this ternary mixture, the tourmaline decomposing efficiency was found to be weakened prominently using 100 °C as the digestion temperature, and tourmaline powders can be observed even after 72 h of continuous heating with B contents within 1.09–1.23% (n = 5). To assess the accuracy of this developed method, the boron recovery of anhydrous lithium tetraborate was studied. It was found that the boron recoveries were within 96.59–102.12% (RSD < 1%, n = 5), demonstrating the accuracy and reliability of this proposed method, which exhibits advantages of high B preserving efficiency, and giving concentration information of both B and trace elements simultaneously. By applying such a boron–mannitol complex-based wet acid digestion method, the chemical composition of boron and trace elements in three tourmaline samples from different pegmatites were quantified, which provided valuable information to distinguish regional deposits and the associated evolution stages. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Analytical Chemistry)
25 pages, 22213 KiB  
Article
Geochronology and Geochemistry of Granitic Pegmatites from Tashidaban Li Deposit in the Central Altun Tagh, Northwest China
by Kai Kang, Yince Ma, Peng Zhang, Hang Li, Xuehai Wang, Zhaoxia Liao, Lei Niu, Jianzhong Chen, Xingzhong Liu and Xingwang Xu
Minerals 2024, 14(6), 542; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14060542 - 24 May 2024
Viewed by 628
Abstract
The Central Altun orogenic system is a result of the amalgamation of multiple micro-continental blocks and island arcs. This complex system originated from subduction–accretion–collision processes in the Proto-Tethys Ocean during the Early Paleozoic. Research has reported the discovery of several Li-Be granitic pegmatite [...] Read more.
The Central Altun orogenic system is a result of the amalgamation of multiple micro-continental blocks and island arcs. This complex system originated from subduction–accretion–collision processes in the Proto-Tethys Ocean during the Early Paleozoic. Research has reported the discovery of several Li-Be granitic pegmatite deposits in the Central Altun Block, including the North Tugeman granitic pegmatite Li-Be deposit, Tugeman granitic pegmatite Be deposit, Tashisayi granitic pegmatite Li deposit, South Washixia granitic pegmatite Li deposit, and Tamuqie granitic pegmatite Li deposit. The Tashidaban granitic pegmatite Li deposit has been newly discovered along the northern margin of the Central Altun Block. Field and geochemical studies of the Tashidaban granitic pegmatite Li deposit indicate: (1) Spodumene pegmatites and elbaite pegmatites, as Li-bearing granitic pegmatites that form the Tashidaban granitic pegmatite Li deposit, intrude into the two-mica schist, and marble of the Muzisayi Formation of the Tashidaban Group. (2) Columbite–tantalite group minerals and zircon U-Pb dating results indicate that the mineralization age of Tashidaban Li granitic pegmatites is 450.2 ± 2.4 Ma with a superimposed magmatic event at around 418–422 Ma later. (3) Whole-rock geochemical results indicate that the Kumudaban rock sequence belongs to the S-type high-K to calc-alkaline granites and the Tashidaban Li granitic pegmatites originated from the extreme differentiation by fractional crystallization of the Kumdaban granite pluton. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Schematic map showing the position of the Altun, NW China, and (<b>b</b>) Geological map of Altun, NW China, after [<a href="#B45-minerals-14-00542" class="html-bibr">45</a>]. Igneous crystallization and mineralization ages of granitic pegmatite deposits are from: 1—[<a href="#B44-minerals-14-00542" class="html-bibr">44</a>]; 2—[<a href="#B46-minerals-14-00542" class="html-bibr">46</a>]; 3—[<a href="#B63-minerals-14-00542" class="html-bibr">63</a>]; 4—[<a href="#B48-minerals-14-00542" class="html-bibr">48</a>]; 5—[<a href="#B64-minerals-14-00542" class="html-bibr">64</a>]; 6—[<a href="#B65-minerals-14-00542" class="html-bibr">65</a>]; 7—this study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Geological map of (<b>a</b>) Kumudaban-Tashidaban area and (<b>b</b>) the Tashidaban granitic pegmatite Li deposit.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Photographs of the Kumudaban granite facies and pegmatites from the Tamuqie granitic pegmatite Li deposit. (<b>a</b>) Photomicrograph of biotite granite from Kumudaban. (<b>b</b>) Photomicrograph of muscovite granite from Kumudaban. (<b>c</b>) Photomicrograph of albite granite from Kumudaban. (<b>d</b>) Photomicrograph of tourmaline granite from Kumudaban. (<b>e</b>) Field photograph of the tρ13 spodumene pegmatite from the Tamuqie granitic pegmatite Li deposit. (<b>f</b>) Photomicrograph of the tρ13 spodumene pegmatite from the aplite zone. Abbreviations: Qz: quartz; Pl: plagioclase; Kfs: K-feldspar; Ab: albite; Mus: muscovite; Grt: garnet; Tur: tourmaline; Spd: spodumene.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Field photographs of the Tashidaban granitic pegmatite Li deposit and representing hand specimens of the studied pegmatites. (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>) Field photographs of the studied pegmatites. (<b>e</b>–<b>g</b>) Hand specimens of the ρ40 elbaite pegmatite, ρ26 tourmaline granite, and the ρ36 spodumene pegmatite. Abbreviations: Qz: quartz; Ab: albite; Spd: spodumene; Tur: tourmaline; Elb: elbaite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Photographs of the Tashidaban granitic pegmatite Li deposit representing photomicrographs of the studied pegmatites. (<b>a</b>–<b>e</b>) Photomicrographs of the ρ40 elbaite pegmatite. (<b>f</b>) Photomicrograph of the ρ26 tourmaline granite. (<b>g</b>) Photomicrograph of the ρ36 spodumene pegmatite from the aplite zone. (<b>h</b>,<b>i</b>)Photomicrographs of the ρ36 spodumene pegmatite from the Spd-Ab-Qz zone. Abbreviations: Qz: quartz; Ab: albite; Mc: microcline; Ms: muscovite; Spd: spodumene; Tur: tourmaline; Elb: elbaite; CGMs: columbite group minerals; Cst: cassiterite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>SEM-back-scattered electron (BSE) and Cathodoluminescence (CL) images of CGMs and zircons from the Tashidaban granitic pegmatite Li deposit. (<b>a</b>) CGMs from the aplite zone of ρ40 elbaite pegmatite; (<b>b</b>) CGMs from the aplite zone of ρ36 spodumene pegmatite; (<b>c</b>) Zircons from ρ26 tourmaline granite. The orange circles denote the U-Pb dating sites.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Diagrams of CGMs and zircons from the Tashidaban granitic pegmatite Li deposit. (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) CGMs from the zone of ρ40 elbaite pegmatite; (<b>c</b>) CGMs from the zone of ρ36 spodumene pegmatite; (<b>d</b>) Zircons from the zone of ρ26 tourmaline granite; (<b>e</b>) Chondrite-normalized [<a href="#B76-minerals-14-00542" class="html-bibr">76</a>] discrimination plots of (Sm/La)<sub>N</sub> vs. La; (<b>f</b>) Chondrite-normalized REE concentrations for magmatic and hydrothermal zircon [<a href="#B77-minerals-14-00542" class="html-bibr">77</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>(<b>a</b>) Chondrite-normalized REE patterns [<a href="#B78-minerals-14-00542" class="html-bibr">78</a>] and (<b>b</b>) primitive mantle-normalized trace element diagrams [<a href="#B76-minerals-14-00542" class="html-bibr">76</a>]. Kumudaban biotite granite are from [<a href="#B65-minerals-14-00542" class="html-bibr">65</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Formation times of granites and granitic pegmatite Li-Be deposits in the CAB. The granite ages of the NAB are from [<a href="#B90-minerals-14-00542" class="html-bibr">90</a>,<a href="#B91-minerals-14-00542" class="html-bibr">91</a>,<a href="#B92-minerals-14-00542" class="html-bibr">92</a>,<a href="#B93-minerals-14-00542" class="html-bibr">93</a>,<a href="#B94-minerals-14-00542" class="html-bibr">94</a>,<a href="#B95-minerals-14-00542" class="html-bibr">95</a>,<a href="#B96-minerals-14-00542" class="html-bibr">96</a>,<a href="#B97-minerals-14-00542" class="html-bibr">97</a>,<a href="#B98-minerals-14-00542" class="html-bibr">98</a>,<a href="#B99-minerals-14-00542" class="html-bibr">99</a>,<a href="#B100-minerals-14-00542" class="html-bibr">100</a>,<a href="#B101-minerals-14-00542" class="html-bibr">101</a>]; the granite ages of the CAB are from [<a href="#B46-minerals-14-00542" class="html-bibr">46</a>,<a href="#B47-minerals-14-00542" class="html-bibr">47</a>,<a href="#B48-minerals-14-00542" class="html-bibr">48</a>,<a href="#B60-minerals-14-00542" class="html-bibr">60</a>,<a href="#B62-minerals-14-00542" class="html-bibr">62</a>,<a href="#B88-minerals-14-00542" class="html-bibr">88</a>,<a href="#B89-minerals-14-00542" class="html-bibr">89</a>,<a href="#B90-minerals-14-00542" class="html-bibr">90</a>,<a href="#B102-minerals-14-00542" class="html-bibr">102</a>,<a href="#B103-minerals-14-00542" class="html-bibr">103</a>,<a href="#B104-minerals-14-00542" class="html-bibr">104</a>,<a href="#B105-minerals-14-00542" class="html-bibr">105</a>]. Igneous crystallization and mineralization ages of Li-Be deposits are consistent with the literature in <a href="#minerals-14-00542-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>(<b>a</b>) ASI shown by A/NK vs. A/CNK diagram [<a href="#B113-minerals-14-00542" class="html-bibr">113</a>]; (<b>b</b>) the K<sub>2</sub>O vs. SiO<sub>2</sub> diagram with dividing curves from [<a href="#B114-minerals-14-00542" class="html-bibr">114</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Selected variation diagrams of granites and pegmatites from the Kumudaban area, Tamuqie granitic pegmatite Li deposit, and Tashidaban granitic pegmatite Li deposit.</p>
Full article ">
30 pages, 18140 KiB  
Article
Geological and Geochemical Characterization of Variscan Pegmatites in the Sidi Bou Othmane District, Central Jebilet Province, Morocco
by Amina Wafik, Nouamane El Aouad, Youssef Daafi, Yousra Morsli, Marouane Chniouar, Rosalda Punturo, Aida Maria Conte, Daniela Guglietta and Wissale Aba Sidi
Geosciences 2024, 14(6), 144; https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences14060144 - 24 May 2024
Viewed by 1078
Abstract
The Sidi Bou Othmane (SBO) pegmatite district is situated in the Central Jebilet massif, Western Meseta domain, Morocco. The SBO district is hosted essentially in a volcano-sedimentary series composed of Late-Devonian Sarhlef shales. Pegmatite bodies crop out as dykes, which are oriented from [...] Read more.
The Sidi Bou Othmane (SBO) pegmatite district is situated in the Central Jebilet massif, Western Meseta domain, Morocco. The SBO district is hosted essentially in a volcano-sedimentary series composed of Late-Devonian Sarhlef shales. Pegmatite bodies crop out as dykes, which are oriented from N-S to E-W and are generally variably deformed with ductile and/or brittle structures with ante, syn- or post-kinematic criteria. Petrographic observations of pegmatite dykes show that feldspars (i.e., albite, microcline) are the most abundant mineral phases, followed by quartz and micas, with tourmaline and accessory minerals such as garnet, and zircon also featuring heavily, as well as secondary minerals such as clinochlore, sericite, and illite. The geochemical study of the SBO pegmatites indicates that they have mainly S-type granitic compositions, which are peraluminous granites with calc-alkalic affinities. The study of trace elements indicates that SBO pegmatites were formed in post-orogenic syn-collision context during the Variscan orogeny by the partial melting of argilliferous sediment. They can be ascribed to the muscovite-bearing pegmatite; moreover, they have good potential regarding ceramics. They also contain minerals, such as feldspar, which have been recently assessed as critical raw materials by the European Union. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Structural Geology and Tectonics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Localization of the Jebilet Massif in the Variscan of Morocco; (<b>b</b>) geological context of the Variscan Jebilet Massif, showing the location of the SBO study area (modified from Huvelin) [<a href="#B28-geosciences-14-00144" class="html-bibr">28</a>]; (<b>c</b>) synthetic lithostratigraphic column of the SBO area in the Jebilet Massif modified after Bordonaro [<a href="#B30-geosciences-14-00144" class="html-bibr">30</a>], Delchini [<a href="#B26-geosciences-14-00144" class="html-bibr">26</a>], Lazreq et al. [<a href="#B29-geosciences-14-00144" class="html-bibr">29</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Simplified geological map showing the distribution of the pegmatites within the Sidi Bou Othmane area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>a</b>) The host rock shows alternating between metapelite and sandstone; (<b>b</b>) the calcareous levels at the top (S0 is stratification and S1 is schistosity).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The mineralogy of a pegmatite vein (<b>A</b>) with tourmaline (Turm), quartz (QZ) and feldspar (Fld); (<b>B</b>) with muscovite (Ms), quartz (QZ) and K-feldspar (K-Fld).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Field picture shows the zonation that has been observed in the pegmatite in SBO area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Structural features measured at the scale of (<b>a</b>) the outcrop directional rose diagram of the schistosity and (<b>b</b>) the pole dip of fold stereoplot.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Field pictures showing (<b>a</b>) S1 schistosity folding, (<b>b</b>,<b>c</b>) boudinaged pegmatite dykes, (<b>d</b>) diaclases; (<b>e</b>) pegmatite boudinaged dike, (<b>f</b>) tension jointsin a pegmatite dyke (P: Pegmatite; S1: Schistosity).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Photomicrographs showing (<b>A</b>) large muscovite (Ms), albite (Ab) and quartz (Qz) crystals, garnet (Gr) and zircon (Zr); (<b>B</b>) large quartz with tourmaline (Tur); (<b>C</b>,<b>D</b>) sheared area with plagioclase (Pl), quartz (Qz) and muscovite (Ms); (<b>E</b>,<b>F</b>) large patches of cataclastic plagioclase (Pl) (albite Ab) with and quartz (Qz), and muscovite (Ms).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Binary variation diagrams showing major elements versus SiO<sub>2</sub> (wt%) of SBO pegmatites.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Binary variation diagrams showing trace elements versus SiO<sub>2</sub> (wt%) of SBO pegmatites.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>(<b>a</b>) Classification diagrams of (SBO) pegmatite TAS diagram (Total Alkalis versus Silica after Middlemost et al. [<a href="#B51-geosciences-14-00144" class="html-bibr">51</a>]; (<b>b</b>) classification diagrams. A/NK versus A/CNK diagram after Maniar et al. [<a href="#B52-geosciences-14-00144" class="html-bibr">52</a>]; (<b>c</b>) AFM diagram after Irvine et al. [<a href="#B53-geosciences-14-00144" class="html-bibr">53</a>]; (<b>d</b>) classification diagrams. Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/CaO + Na<sub>2</sub>O + K<sub>2</sub>O versus SiO<sub>2</sub> after White et al. and Chappell et al. [<a href="#B56-geosciences-14-00144" class="html-bibr">56</a>,<a href="#B57-geosciences-14-00144" class="html-bibr">57</a>] (<b>e</b>) SBO pegmatite plotted in the Rb-Ba-Sr ternary diagram, after El Bouseily et al. [<a href="#B58-geosciences-14-00144" class="html-bibr">58</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Tectonic discrimination diagrams for SBO pegmatites compositions. (<b>a</b>) Rb vs. Y+ Nb diagram; (<b>b</b>) Nb vs. Y diagram, after Pearce et al. [<a href="#B59-geosciences-14-00144" class="html-bibr">59</a>] and Pearce [<a href="#B60-geosciences-14-00144" class="html-bibr">60</a>]; (<b>c</b>) Rb versus Yb + Ta; (<b>d</b>) Ta versus Yb, after Pearce et al. [<a href="#B58-geosciences-14-00144" class="html-bibr">58</a>]. Tectonic fields are ocean-ridge granites (ORG); syn-collisional granites (syn-COLG); volcanic-arc granites (VAG) and within-plate granites (WPG). The SBO pegmatites show syn-collisional granite affinity.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Discrimination geodynamic diagram [<a href="#B59-geosciences-14-00144" class="html-bibr">59</a>,<a href="#B62-geosciences-14-00144" class="html-bibr">62</a>] R1 = 4Si-11 (Na + K) −2(Fe + Ti) versus R2 = 6Ca + 2Mg + Al. The SBO pegmatites show syn-collisional and post-orogenic affinity.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Multielement spider and REEs normalization diagrams explaining magma source and differentiation: (<b>a</b>) Upper Continental Crust spider plot normalized and (<b>b</b>) REE chondrite spider plot after McDonough et al. [<a href="#B70-geosciences-14-00144" class="html-bibr">70</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>(<b>a</b>) Ternary diagrams showing Normative Qz-Ab-Or ternary diagram [<a href="#B71-geosciences-14-00144" class="html-bibr">71</a>]; (<b>b</b>) bivariate K<sub>2</sub>O − Na<sub>2</sub>O variation diagram [<a href="#B49-geosciences-14-00144" class="html-bibr">49</a>]; (<b>c</b>) Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> − (Na<sub>2</sub>O + K<sub>2</sub>O) − (Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> t +MnO + MgO) ternary diagram showing alteration type [<a href="#B72-geosciences-14-00144" class="html-bibr">72</a>].</p>
Full article ">
25 pages, 8842 KiB  
Article
Timing and Evolution of Gold Mineralization in the Maljavr Occurrence (NW Russia), NE Part of the Fennoscandian Shield
by Arkadii A. Kalinin, Nickolay M. Kudryashov and Yevgeny E. Savchenko
Minerals 2024, 14(6), 535; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14060535 - 22 May 2024
Viewed by 707
Abstract
Gold occurrence Maljavr is the first Archean conglomerate-hosted gold mineralization found in the Fennoscandian Shield. Gold-mineralized metasomatic rocks form a set of lenses within a 10 m thick linear zone, conformable to the bedding of host conglomerates. The lenses are up to 10 [...] Read more.
Gold occurrence Maljavr is the first Archean conglomerate-hosted gold mineralization found in the Fennoscandian Shield. Gold-mineralized metasomatic rocks form a set of lenses within a 10 m thick linear zone, conformable to the bedding of host conglomerates. The lenses are up to 10 m long and up to 1 m thick and they clearly exhibit three alteration envelopes: the rock in the central part consists of garnet and quartz or garnet-only; biotite, garnet, and quartz make the intermediate biotite–garnet envelope; hornblende, hedenbergite, and quartz are the principal rock-forming minerals in the outer zone of the lenses. All metasomatic rocks contain sulfide mineralization up to 15–20 vol.% and up to 0.6 g/t Au. The main ore mineral is pyrrhotite, and the minor minerals are arsenopyrite, chalcopyrite, pentlandite, löllingite, and troilite. The age of zircon from biotite gneiss in the zone of alteration is 2664 ± 18 Ma, this is considered as the time of formation of lenses of metasomatic rocks. Biotite gneiss-conglomerate and metasomatic rocks were later intruded by tourmaline granite pegmatite 2508 ± 7 Ma. The injection of pegmatite caused re-crystallization of sulfides (mainly arsenopyrite and löllingite) and redistribution of gold. Visible gold in association with Bi minerals native bismuth, ehrigite, maldonite, bismuthinite, joseite-B, and hedleyite was found in inclusions in recrystallized arsenopyrite and löllingite. Au content in the rocks with recrystallized arsenopyrite and löllingite is >1 g/t, up to 30 g/t in hand samples. The 2508 Ma pegmatite is interpreted as synchronous with formation of gold mineralization in its present form. The linkage of gold mineralization with pegmatite and geochemical association Au-As-Se-Te-Bi in the mineralized rocks agree with characteristics of intrusion-related gold deposits worldwide. Biotite gneiss–metaconglomerate, hosting the mineralized altered rocks, was the probable primary source of arsenic and gold for mineralization. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic geological map of the Maljavr gold occurrence area, designed using data from [<a href="#B12-minerals-14-00535" class="html-bibr">12</a>], and position of the Maljavr occurrence in the tectonic map of the Fennoscandian Shield (inset).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Graded rhythmical bedding in conglomerate in an outcrop (<b>A</b>) and in a block (<b>B</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Schematic geological map of the Maljavr gold occurrence.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Photographs of outcrops in the Maljavr occurrence. (<b>A</b>) foliation in the biotite gneiss–metaconglomerate; (<b>B</b>) migmatization at the contact of biotite gneiss with pegmatite; (<b>C</b>,<b>D</b>) small pegmatite lenses, cutting schistosity in metaconglomerate.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Lenses of altered rocks in the metaconglomerate in a block (<b>A</b>) and in an outcrop (<b>B</b>). Red, yellow and green lines show the boundaries of garnet-quartz (Gr-Q), biotite-garnet (Bt-Gr) and hornblende-hedenbergite (Hbl-Hd) metasomatic rocks, correspondingly.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Thin section microscope photos of unaltered biotite gneiss (<b>A</b>), hornblende–hedenbergite (Hbl-Hd) (<b>B</b>), biotite–garnet (Bt-Gr) (<b>C</b>) and garnet–quartz (Gr-Q) (<b>D</b>) metasomatic rocks, plane polarized light. Bt—biotite, Fsp—feldspar (plagioclase), Grt—garnet, Hbl—hornblende, Hd—hedenbergite, Ms—muscovite, Qz—quartz. Here and below all mineral symbols are given according to IMA recommendations [<a href="#B26-minerals-14-00535" class="html-bibr">26</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Variation of the main components content in altered rocks: maximum, minimum and mean values, in molar quantities. Rocks: 1—unaltered biotite plagiogneiss (8 samples), 2–4—altered rocks: 2—hornblende–hedenbergite (11), 3—garnet–biotite (5), 4—garnet–quartz and garnet-only (10 samples) (see <a href="#app1-minerals-14-00535" class="html-app">Table S1</a> for assay results).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>General element ratio diagrams [<a href="#B27-minerals-14-00535" class="html-bibr">27</a>] for altered rocks of the Maljavr occurrence in coordinates Na<sub>2</sub>O/Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>—K<sub>2</sub>O/Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> (<b>A</b>), K<sub>2</sub>O/Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>—(Na<sub>2</sub>O + K<sub>2</sub>O)/Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> (<b>B</b>), FeO + CaO)/Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>—SiO<sub>2</sub>/Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> (<b>C</b>), and FeO/Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>—CaO)/Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> (<b>D</b>). BG—unaltered biotite gneiss (red symbols); altered rocks: Gr-Qz—garnet–quartz rock (blue), Grt-Bt—garnet–biotite rock (brown), Hbl-Hd—hornblende–hedenbergite rock (green symbols).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Geochemical spectra of unaltered biotite gneiss–metaconglomerate (TY-1, TY-36), slightly altered biotite gneiss at the contact with a lens of altered rock (TY-25), unmineralized altered rocks (samples TY-32, TY-35 with 0.04–0.05 g/t Au), and gold-mineralized altered rocks (samples TY-42, TY-60 with &gt;1 g/t Au), normalized by the average for the upper continental crust [<a href="#B28-minerals-14-00535" class="html-bibr">28</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Recrystallized arsenopyrite (big white grains) in hornblende–hedenbergite metasomatic rocks with pyrrhotite–arsenopyrite dissemination. Photos of polished sections.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Arsenopyrite from the Maljavr gold occurrence. (<b>A</b>) zoning in arsenopyrite-1, polished section photo, crossed polarized light. (<b>B</b>) a chain of arsenopyrite-2 grains in hornblende–hedenbergite rock, polished section photo, plane polarized light. (<b>C</b>,<b>D</b>) complicated zoning in arsenopyrite-2—back-scattered electron (BSE) images: arsenic-rich zones are lighter than arsenic-poor. Apy—arsenopyrite, Bi—native bismuth.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Pegmatite lenses, cutting biotite gneiss and metasomatic rock, a specimen photo with detail area. The arrows point at a chain of arsenopyrite-2 grains in a thin biotite veinlet between two pegmatite lenses. Apy—arsenopyrire, Bt—biotite, Grt—garnet, Hbl—hornblende, Hd—hedenbergite, Qz—quartz.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Inclusions of löllingite, gold, native bismuth, and ehrigite in arsenopyrite-2 (<b>A</b>), and concentration of bismuth–ehrigite–gold inclusions at the contact arsenopyrite–löllingite (<b>B</b>). BSE-images. Apy—arsenopyrite, Au—native gold, Bi—native bismuth, Ehg—ehrigite, Lo—löllingite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Inclusions of native gold and bismuth, bismuth and ehrigite (<b>A</b>), and polymineral gold–bismuth–ehrigite inclusion (<b>B</b>) in arsenopyrite-2. BSE-images. Apy—arsenopyrite, Au—native gold, Bi—native bismuth, Ehg—ehrigite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Maldonite with gold (<b>A</b>) and with native bismuth and ehrigite (<b>B</b>) in polymineral inclusions in arsenopyrite-2, BSE-images. Apy—arsenopyrite, Au—native gold, Bi—native bismuth, Ehg—ehrigite, Mdo—maldonite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>BSE images of zircons from the Maljavr occurrence: (<b>A</b>) zircons from biotite gneiss, (<b>B</b>) zircons from tourmaline granite pegmatite. Bt—biotite, Mnz—monazite, Zrn—zircon.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Diagram with concordia for biotite gneiss from the Maljavr occurrence.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Diagram with concordia for tourmaline granite pegmatite from the Maljavr occurrence.</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 15317 KiB  
Article
A New Insight into the Genesis of Graphite Deposits in Madagascar Using U–Pb Zircon Dating and Electron Microprobe Analysis
by Ming-Jian Yang, Yong-Jun Di, Da Zhang, Da-Tian Wu, Ye Fang and Xin-Ming Zhang
Minerals 2024, 14(5), 484; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14050484 - 2 May 2024
Viewed by 1030
Abstract
Madagascar is globally recognized as an important producer of high-quality flaky graphite. However, current research on graphite deposits in Madagascar remains insufficient. Previous studies have linked the genesis of Madagascan graphite deposits to the metamorphism of sedimentary organic matter. Here, we provide a [...] Read more.
Madagascar is globally recognized as an important producer of high-quality flaky graphite. However, current research on graphite deposits in Madagascar remains insufficient. Previous studies have linked the genesis of Madagascan graphite deposits to the metamorphism of sedimentary organic matter. Here, we provide a case study of graphite deposits in Madagascar, combining new data from the Ambahita graphite deposit (AMG) in southern Madagascar with data from the Antanisoa graphite deposit (ANG) in central Madagascar and the Vohitasara graphite deposit (VOG) on the east coast of Madagascar. We note that the mineral assemblages of graphite-bearing rocks in the AMG, ANG, and VOG are not typical of metamorphic mineral assemblages but rather the results of filling and metasomatism by mantle-derived fluids that occurred after peak metamorphism. Electron microprobe analysis indicates that the graphite of the AMG, VOG, and ANG is usually associated with phlogopite or Mg-biotite; the phlogopite shares a common genesis with other widespread phlogopite deposits across Madagascar. We reveal that the distribution of graphite deposits in Madagascar is primarily controlled by ductile shear zones between blocks. Ductile shear zones that extend deep into the mantle can provide an ideal migration channel and architecture for the emplacement of mantle-derived fluids. The graphite mineralization formed no earlier than the peak metamorphism (490 Ma) and no later than the intrusion of pegmatite veins (389 ± 5 Ma). The distribution of graphite deposits, graphite orebody morphologies, mineral associations, and geochemical data suggest that the genesis of graphite deposits in Madagascar is linked to mantle-derived fluid filling rather than the metamorphism of sediments, as previously suggested. These findings have important implications for similar deposits in Madagascar and potentially globally. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Microbeam Analysis Characterization in Petrogenesis and Ore Deposit)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Tectonic division of Madagascar (after [<a href="#B48-minerals-14-00484" class="html-bibr">48</a>,<a href="#B49-minerals-14-00484" class="html-bibr">49</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) Simplified regional geological map of the Ambahita ore district in southern Madagascar. (<b>b</b>) Simplified geological map of the Ambahita graphite deposit. Modified from [<a href="#B53-minerals-14-00484" class="html-bibr">53</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Cross-section of the AMG, including the No. 7 exploration line (<b>a</b>); No. 9 exploration line (<b>b</b>); No. 11 exploration line (<b>c</b>); and No. 13 exploration line (<b>d</b>) (modified from [<a href="#B53-minerals-14-00484" class="html-bibr">53</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Field photographs of the AMG. (<b>a</b>) The exploration trench of the No. 13 exploration line. (<b>b</b>) Graphite orebodies developed along the gneissosity in graphite-bearing granofels. (<b>c</b>) Graphite orebodies developed along the schistosity of graphite-bearing granofels. (<b>d</b>) Veined graphite orebodies developed along the gneissosity in the central part of the exploratory trench. (<b>e</b>) Flaky graphite with lepidoblastic texture, filling along the gneissosity in graphite-bearing granofels. The graphite orebodies in the felsic component are barren. (<b>f</b>) The breakstones of quartz veins on the surface. (<b>g</b>) Fe–Mn mineralization occurring as veins or lenses along the schistosity of graphite granofels in the eastern part of the exploratory trench. The yellow dotted box indicates lenses of Fe–Mn mineralization. The white dashed lines indicate Fe–Mn stringer veins. (<b>h</b>) The gneissosity of the graphite-bearing granofels is folded in the western part of the exploratory trench. (<b>i</b>) The enlargement and enrichment of the graphite flakes around the edges of pegmatite veins.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Representative photomicrographs of minerals from the AMG. (<b>a</b>) Biotite and phlogopite intergrown with graphite (plane-polarized light). (<b>b</b>) Serpentine alteration occurring in phlogopite (plane-polarized light). (<b>c</b>) Oriented flaky graphite (reflected light). (<b>d</b>) Flaky graphite filling between quartz and feldspar grains and along their cracks (reflected light). (<b>e</b>) Graphite and biotite filling each other along cleavage planes (plane-polarized light). (<b>f</b>) Flaky graphite filling garnet fractures (reflected light). (<b>g</b>) Graphite intergrown with euhedral quartz and biotite, filling their fractures. The garnet grain includes quartz melt inclusions (reflected light). (<b>h</b>) Quartz grain with graphite and biotite melt inclusions (cross-polarized light). (<b>i</b>) Tourmaline in graphite schist from the ANG containing melt droplets of graphite and silicate minerals (plane-polarized light).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(Al<sup>IV</sup> + Fe<sup>3+</sup> + Ti-Fe<sup>2+</sup> + Mn<sup>2+</sup>-Mg ternary classification of micas from the AMG, VOG, and ANG in Madagascar (after [<a href="#B57-minerals-14-00484" class="html-bibr">57</a>]). Note: Red for AMG; Blue for VOG; Black for ANG (data are from [<a href="#B25-minerals-14-00484" class="html-bibr">25</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Representative CL images and LA–ICP–MS zircon U–Pb concordia plots of graphite schist from the ANG (<b>a</b>) and VOG (<b>b</b>), pegmatite veins from the ANG and VOG (<b>c</b>), and a quartz vein from the VOG (<b>d</b>). Error ellipses are 1σ. The insets indicate the weighted mean <sup>206</sup>Pb/<sup>238</sup>U ages.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Distribution map of graphite and phlogopite deposits in Madagascar (after [<a href="#B48-minerals-14-00484" class="html-bibr">48</a>,<a href="#B71-minerals-14-00484" class="html-bibr">71</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Al-Al<sub>50</sub>Fe<sub>50</sub>-Al<sub>50</sub>Mg<sub>50</sub> diagram (base map modified after [<a href="#B72-minerals-14-00484" class="html-bibr">72</a>]; data from [<a href="#B25-minerals-14-00484" class="html-bibr">25</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Compositions of micas from the AMG, VOG, and ANG on (<b>a</b>) Al<sup>IV</sup>-Fe<sup>2+</sup>/(Fe<sup>2+</sup>+Mg) and (<b>b</b>) FeO<sup>T</sup>/(FeO<sup>T</sup>+MgO)-MgO diagrams ((<b>a</b>) after [<a href="#B75-minerals-14-00484" class="html-bibr">75</a>]; (<b>b</b>) after [<a href="#B76-minerals-14-00484" class="html-bibr">76</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Preliminary schematic diagram showing the graphite deposits linked to mantle-derived fluid filling in Madagascar (base map from [<a href="#B78-minerals-14-00484" class="html-bibr">78</a>]). Abbreviations: Amp–Ampanihy, Ber–Beraketa, Gr–Graphite, Phl–Phlogopite, MB–Magnesian biotite.</p>
Full article ">
32 pages, 16798 KiB  
Article
The Geology and Mineral Chemistry of Beryl Mineralization, South Eastern Desert, Egypt: A Deeper Insight into Genesis and Distribution
by Mohamed Zaki Khedr, Gehad M. Saleh, Khaled M. Abdelfadil, Eiichi Takazawa, Kamal Abdelrahman, Akihiro Tamura and Shaimaa Ali El-Shafei
Minerals 2024, 14(5), 465; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14050465 - 28 Apr 2024
Viewed by 1220
Abstract
Beryl mineralization in the Nugrus-Sikait domain in the South Eastern Desert (SED) of Egypt occurs as disseminated crystals in granitic pegmatite and quartz, as well as pegmatite veins crosscutting mélange schist and ophiolitic rocks. When granitic pegmatite comes into contact with the ophiolitic [...] Read more.
Beryl mineralization in the Nugrus-Sikait domain in the South Eastern Desert (SED) of Egypt occurs as disseminated crystals in granitic pegmatite and quartz, as well as pegmatite veins crosscutting mélange schist and ophiolitic rocks. When granitic pegmatite comes into contact with the ophiolitic rocks, phlogopite and amphibole schists are formed due to K metasomatism. The ophiolitic mélange is intruded by leucogranite and related pegmatite along the NNW to NW Nugrus shear zone. Beryl samples have been collected from Um Sleimat, Madinat Nugrus, Wadi Abu Rusheid, and Wadi Sikait. Major oxides and in situ trace and rare earth elements (REEs) of beryl and associated minerals were analyzed through EPMA and LA-ICP-MS, respectively. The investigated beryl, based on its color and chemical compositions, can be classified into the two following types: pegmatitic beryl (type I) and schist-related beryl (type II). The former is colorless to pale green, and is mainly restricted in pegmatite veins; it is poor in Cr2O3 (up to 0.03 wt%) and MgO (Nil). The latter, deep green in color, is rich in Cr2O3 (up to 0.27 wt%) and MgO (up to 2.71 wt%), and occurs within quartz veins, phlogopite schists, and tremolite schists. The abundant beryl mineralization in phlogopite schists and their related quartz veins suggests that granite and associated pegmatite are the source rocks for the Be-bearing fluids that migrate along the NW-SE trending deep-seated tectonic zone, such as the Nugrus shear zone. Therefore, the formation of beryl in schists is attributed to the interaction of granitic/pegmatitic-derived Be-bearing fluids with serpentinite and gabbro interlayered with mélange schists. Variations in the trace and REE contents of both beryl types (I and II) indicate their two-stage formation from different compositions of Be-rich fluids, where light REEs, Zr, Nb, Ba, and Th decrease from type I beryl to type II. These two phases of beryl could be attributed to the magmatic/hydrothermal fluids associated with the pegmatite emplacement. The early phase of the late-stage magmatic-derived fluids was closely related to magma evolution and pegmatite formation, forming euhedral type I beryl. The late phase of pegmatite-derived fluids was mixed with serpentinite/schist-derived fluids that cause high V and Cr content in type II beryl. The composition of parent magmas of felsic rocks, the high degree of magma fractionation or the late stage melts, fluid compositions (rich in Be, Li, Cs, Rb, K), and alkali metasomatism, as well as the linear NW-SE trending deep-seated shear zone, are all factors possibly influencing beryl mineralization in the SED of Egypt. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Geological map of the Eastern Desert of Egypt, showing the distribution of basement rocks and the study areas (Modified after Stern and Ali [<a href="#B27-minerals-14-00465" class="html-bibr">27</a>]). (<b>b</b>) Geological map of the Nugrus-Sikait area in the SED of Egypt, including four locations of beryl: (1) Wadi Abu Rusheid, (2) Wadi Sikait, (3) Madinat Nugrus, and (4) Um Sleimat.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Field photographs of beryl mineralization in basement rocks from the Nugrus-Sikait domain, in the SED of Egypt. (<b>a</b>) Post-orogenic granite (younger granite, 550–640 Ma) intruded in the foliated ophiolitic mélange, including the mine dump and old beryl mines in Wadi Um Sleimat. (<b>b</b>) Hand specimen of anhedral beryl crystals hosted by quartz veins and phlogopite schists, belonging to the ophiolitic mélange in Wadi Um Sleimat. (<b>c</b>) The ancient tunnels and dumps of beryl at the contact between the ophiolitic mélange and biotite granites in Wadi Sikait. (<b>d</b>) Hand specimen of beryl-bearing phlogopite schists belonging to the ophiolitic mélange, Wadi Sikait. (<b>e</b>) Beryl-bearing quartz veins cutting in the ophiolitic mélange (e.g., volcanogenic metasediments), Madinat Nugrus. (<b>f</b>) Hand specimen of euhedral olive-green beryl and pale green beryl in Madinat Nugrus. (<b>g</b>) Beryl-bearing pegmatite veins cutting the ophiolitic mélange in Wadi Abu Rusheid. (<b>h</b>) Hand specimen of pale green anhedral to euhedral beryl crystals in Wadi Abu Rusheid.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Photomicrographs in cross-polarized light of the studied pegmatites, except (<b>b</b>) is a scanning electron microscope (SEM) image. (<b>a</b>) Clear hexagonal euhedral beryl (Brl) crystal in a matrix of quartz (Qz) megacrysts; Abu Rusheid quartz vein. (<b>b</b>) Homogenous six-sided euhedral beryl (emerald) crystals in a matrix of interlocked quartz grains. (<b>c</b>) Coarse columnar beryl crystal including interstitial phlogopite (Phl) and muscovite (Ms) flakes, and invaded by quartz veinlets; Sikait quartz vein. (<b>d</b>) Inclusions of fine phlogopite blebs or fibers within coarse emerald crystal embedded in serrated quartz; Madinat Nugrus phlogopite schist. (<b>e</b>) Fine muscovite blebs and interstitial subhedral flake of muscovite-corroding homogeneous megacrysts of euhedral beryl, forming sharp contact with apatite (Ap) and plagioclase (Plg); Abu Rusheid pegmatite. (<b>f</b>) K-feldspar (K-Fs) megacrysts with perthitic texture, including phlogopite (Phl) and muscovite (Ms) flakes; Abu Rusheid pegmatite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images with the EDS spectrum analysis of beryl and associated phlogopite, quartz, and albite in pegmatite and quartz veins. (<b>a</b>) Subhedral beryl crystals dissected by quartz veins, showing homogenous composition without zonation. (<b>b</b>) Coarse subhedral beryl crystal veined with quartz string. (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) Anhedral to subhedral phlogopite plates with altered rims (secondary origin), showing a sharp boundary with subhedral beryl crystals in quartz and an albite matrix of pegmatite veins. (<b>e</b>) Deformed phlogopite flake (secondary origin) with clear bending due to deformation in beryl-bearing quartz veins.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Substitution diagrams of beryl from granitic pegmatites. (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> vs. MgO, FeO, and Na<sub>2</sub>O in Um Sleimat beryl. (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>) Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> vs. MgO, FeO, and Na<sub>2</sub>O in Sikait beryl. (<b>g</b>–<b>i</b>) Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> vs. MgO, FeO, and Na<sub>2</sub>O in Madinat Nugrus beryl. (<b>j</b>–<b>l</b>) Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> vs. MgO, FeO, and Na<sub>2</sub>O in Abu Rusheid beryl.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Mica chemistry from pegmatites and mica schists. (<b>a</b>) (Al<sup>vi</sup> +Ti +Fe<sup>+3</sup>)-Mg-(Fe<sup>+2</sup>+Mn) ternary diagram [<a href="#B36-minerals-14-00465" class="html-bibr">36</a>]. (<b>b</b>) Fe/(Fe+Mg) vs. Al<sup>iv</sup> [<a href="#B37-minerals-14-00465" class="html-bibr">37</a>]. (<b>c</b>) Mg/(Fe+Mg) vs. Al<sup>vi</sup> [<a href="#B37-minerals-14-00465" class="html-bibr">37</a>]. (<b>d</b>) Mg-Ti-Na ternary classification diagram [<a href="#B42-minerals-14-00465" class="html-bibr">42</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>In situ trace elements in emerald from pegmatites. (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) Cr vs. V in Um Sleimat, Madinat Nugrus, and Sikait, respectively. (<b>d</b>–<b>f</b>) (Cr+V) vs. LILEs (Ba+Rb+Cs+Sr) in Um Sleimat, Madinat Nugrus, and Sikait, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>In situ trace and REE elements in emerald/beryl from pegmatites. (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>) Chondrite (C1)-normalized REE patterns. (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>) Chondrite (C1)-normalized compatible elements. C1-normalized values follow McDonough and Sun [<a href="#B44-minerals-14-00465" class="html-bibr">44</a>]. The field of beryl in Ebrahim-Attar granite is from Azizi et al. [<a href="#B46-minerals-14-00465" class="html-bibr">46</a>], the field of beryl in Velasco pegmatite is from Sardi and Heimann [<a href="#B47-minerals-14-00465" class="html-bibr">47</a>], and the field of psammitic gneiss is from Hilmy et al. [<a href="#B48-minerals-14-00465" class="html-bibr">48</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>In situ trace and REE elements in phlogopite and muscovite from pegmatites. (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>) Patterns of primitive mantle (PM)-normalized trace and REE elements. (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>) Chondrite (C1)-normalized compatible elements. PM- and C1-normalized values follow McDonough and Sun [<a href="#B44-minerals-14-00465" class="html-bibr">44</a>]. The field of metamorphic biotite in metasedimentary rocks is from Samadi et al. [<a href="#B49-minerals-14-00465" class="html-bibr">49</a>], and the field of muscovite in Belvis de Monroy leucogranite (Spain) is from Merino et al. [<a href="#B45-minerals-14-00465" class="html-bibr">45</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Beryl chemistry from pegmatites. (<b>a</b>) MgO-FeO<sup>t</sup>-Cr<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> triplot [<a href="#B35-minerals-14-00465" class="html-bibr">35</a>]. The schist-related and granite-related fields are from Mokhtar et al. [<a href="#B68-minerals-14-00465" class="html-bibr">68</a>]. (<b>b</b>) Na<sub>2</sub>O vs. FeO (wt%), from Merino et al. [<a href="#B45-minerals-14-00465" class="html-bibr">45</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Trace and minor elements (ppm) of beryl. (<b>a</b>) Fe vs. Rb binary diagram. (<b>b</b>) Fe vs. Cs. (<b>c</b>) Rb vs. Cs. (<b>d</b>) Li vs. Fe. The binary discrimination diagrams show the relationships of trace and minor elements (ppm) of the studied beryl in the SED in Egypt and beryl from various localities [<a href="#B64-minerals-14-00465" class="html-bibr">64</a>]. Compositional fields of beryl from various occurrences: 1—Colombia; 2—China; 3—Brazil; 4—Zambia; 5—Afghanistan; 6—Madagascar; 7—Ethiopia; 8—Russia (Urals).</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>The Li/Cs versus Na/Li variation diagram indicates beryl genesis and its source fluids [<a href="#B46-minerals-14-00465" class="html-bibr">46</a>]. Beryl in apogranites in the Eastern Desert of Egypt [<a href="#B63-minerals-14-00465" class="html-bibr">63</a>] and schist-hosted emerald [<a href="#B43-minerals-14-00465" class="html-bibr">43</a>] are used for comparison. Abu Rusheid euhedral beryl (type I) is different in origin from beryl-related schists (type II) in other places.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Schematic sketch showing the genetic model for the genesis of beryl in the studied area (modified after Giuliani et al. [<a href="#B3-minerals-14-00465" class="html-bibr">3</a>]). The model is based on the emplacement in the leucogranite massif, with its beryl-bearing pegmatite in M-UM rock units represented by mica schists and serpentinites. The fluid circulations from the granite into the surrounding rocks and granitic dykes (arrows), preferentially along the contacts between the pegmatite transform the schistose rocks into a magnesium-rich biotite schist and the pegmatite into a desilicated pegmatite.</p>
Full article ">
34 pages, 14138 KiB  
Article
The Geochemistry, Petrogenesis, and Rare-Metal Mineralization of the Peralkaline Granites and Related Pegmatites in the Arabian Shield: A Case Study of the Jabal Sayid and Dayheen Ring Complexes, Central Saudi Arabia
by Hamdy H. Abd El-Naby and Yehia H. Dawood
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(7), 2814; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14072814 - 27 Mar 2024
Viewed by 979
Abstract
The Neoproterozoic period in the Jabal Sayid and Dayheen areas is characterized by three distinct magmatic phases: an early magmatic phase of granodiorite–diorite association, a transitional magmatic phase of monzogranites, and a highly evolved magmatic phase of peralkaline granites and associated pegmatites. The [...] Read more.
The Neoproterozoic period in the Jabal Sayid and Dayheen areas is characterized by three distinct magmatic phases: an early magmatic phase of granodiorite–diorite association, a transitional magmatic phase of monzogranites, and a highly evolved magmatic phase of peralkaline granites and associated pegmatites. The presence of various accessory minerals in the peralkaline granites and pegmatites, such as synchysite, bastnaesite, xenotime, monazite, allanite, pyrochlore, samarskite, and zircon, plays an important role as contributors of REEs, Zr, Y, Nb, Th, and U. The geochemical characteristics indicate that the concentration of these elements occurred primarily during the crystallization and differentiation of the parent magma, with no significant contributions from post-magmatic hydrothermal processes. The obtained geochemical data shed light on the changing nature of magmas during the orogenic cycle, transitioning from subduction-related granodiorite–diorite compositions to collision-related monzogranites and post-collisional peralkaline suites. The granodiorite–diorite association is thought to be derived from the partial melting of predominantly metabasaltic sources, whereas the monzogranites are derived from metatonalite and metagraywacke sources. The peralkaline granites and associated pegmatites are thought to originate from the continental crust. It is assumed that these rocks are formed by the partial melting of metapelitic rocks that are enriched with rare metals. The final peralkaline phase of magmatic evolution is characterized by the enrichment of the residual melt with alkalis (such as sodium and potassium), silica, water, and fluorine. The presence of liquid-saturated melt plays a decisive role in the formation of pegmatites. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Advances, Challenges, and Illustrations in Applied Geochemistry)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>A simplified geological map of the ANS (modified after [<a href="#B11-applsci-14-02814" class="html-bibr">11</a>,<a href="#B12-applsci-14-02814" class="html-bibr">12</a>,<a href="#B13-applsci-14-02814" class="html-bibr">13</a>]) with the sites of the study areas and other rare-metal alkaline granites in the AS (red circles).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>A geological map of (<b>a</b>) the Dayheen area (modified after [<a href="#B14-applsci-14-02814" class="html-bibr">14</a>]) and (<b>b</b>) the Jabal Sayed area (modified after [<a href="#B15-applsci-14-02814" class="html-bibr">15</a>]). Sample locations are also shown.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>a</b>) Sharp intrusive contact between diorite and peralkaline granite in the Dayheen area. (<b>b</b>) A pegmatite dyke within the Dayheen peralkaline granite. (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) Photomicrographs showing the major minerals in the Dayheen hornblende–biotite granite. (<b>e</b>) A photomicrograph showing a blue subhedral crystal of riebeckite within the Dayheen aegirine–riebeckite granite. (<b>f</b>) A photomicrograph showing the slender prismatic shape of aegirine within the Dayheen aegirine–riebeckite granite. (<b>g</b>) A prismatic crystal of zircon within the Dayheen pegmatite. (<b>h</b>) Zoned allanite crystals within the Dayheen pegmatite. Mineral abbreviations according [<a href="#B16-applsci-14-02814" class="html-bibr">16</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) A photo of the pegmatite sheets showing the contact with the Jabal Sayid peralkaline granite. (<b>b</b>) A photo of the oxidized granite within the Jabal Sayid peralkaline granite. (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) Photomicrographs showing the deep-blue crystal of riebeckite and the euhedral crystal of aegirine within the Jabal Sayid peralkaline granite. (<b>e</b>,<b>f</b>) Photomicrographs showing major mineral constituents of the Jabal Sayid pegmatite. Mineral abbreviations according to [<a href="#B16-applsci-14-02814" class="html-bibr">16</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>) Wavelength-dispersion spectral scans of fluorite from Jabel Sayid peralkaline granite. (<b>b</b>) Energy-dispersive X-ray spectrum of synchysite from Jabel Sayid pegmatite. (<b>c</b>) Energy-dispersive X-ray spectrum of thorite from Jabel Sayid pegmatite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The classification of the studied granitic samples according to the R1-R2 diagram [<a href="#B24-applsci-14-02814" class="html-bibr">24</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Magma-type diagrams of Jabal Sayid and Dayheen granites. (<b>a</b>) A/CNK vs. A/NK diagram [<a href="#B25-applsci-14-02814" class="html-bibr">25</a>], (<b>b</b>) AR vs. SiO<sub>2</sub> diagram [<a href="#B26-applsci-14-02814" class="html-bibr">26</a>], AR (Alkalinity Ratio) = [Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> + CaO + (Na<sub>2</sub>O + K<sub>2</sub>O)]/[Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> + CaO-(Na<sub>2</sub>O + K<sub>2</sub>O)], (<b>c</b>) K<sub>2</sub>O vs. SiO<sub>2</sub> diagram [<a href="#B27-applsci-14-02814" class="html-bibr">27</a>], and (<b>d</b>) FeO<sub>t</sub>/(FeO<sub>t</sub> + MgO) vs. SiO<sub>2</sub> diagram of [<a href="#B28-applsci-14-02814" class="html-bibr">28</a>]. Symbols as in <a href="#applsci-14-02814-f006" class="html-fig">Figure 6</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The ocean ridge granite normalized spider diagram of trace elements [<a href="#B29-applsci-14-02814" class="html-bibr">29</a>] for (<b>a</b>) the Dayheen peralkaline granites and pegmatites; (<b>b</b>) the Jabal Sayid peralkaline granites and pegmatites; (<b>c</b>) the Dayheen monzogranites; and (<b>d</b>) the Dayheen granodiorite–diorite association. Symbols as in <a href="#applsci-14-02814-f006" class="html-fig">Figure 6</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Chondrite-normalized REE patterns [<a href="#B30-applsci-14-02814" class="html-bibr">30</a>] for (<b>a</b>) the Dayheen peralkaline granites and pegmatites; (<b>b</b>) the Jabal Sayid peralkaline granites and pegmatites; (<b>c</b>) the Dayheen monzogranites; and (<b>d</b>) the Dayheen granodiorite–diorite association. Symbols as in <a href="#applsci-14-02814-f006" class="html-fig">Figure 6</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>The histogram shows a comparison between Jabal Sayid and Dayheen in terms of their rare metal contents.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>(<b>a</b>) The R1-R2 tectonic setting discrimination diagram of [<a href="#B24-applsci-14-02814" class="html-bibr">24</a>], with tectonic setting fields based on [<a href="#B31-applsci-14-02814" class="html-bibr">31</a>]. The blue dashed line with arrows reflects different stages within a single orogenic cycle. (<b>b</b>) Y + Nb vs. Rb discrimination diagram [<a href="#B29-applsci-14-02814" class="html-bibr">29</a>], post-collisional field (red dashed circle) after Pearce (1996). VAG = volcanic arc granite, SYN-COLG = syn-collision granite, ORG = ocean ridge granite, and WPG = within-plate granite. Symbols as in <a href="#applsci-14-02814-f006" class="html-fig">Figure 6</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>(<b>a</b>) Rb/Zr vs. SiO<sub>2</sub> (after [<a href="#B36-applsci-14-02814" class="html-bibr">36</a>]). (<b>b</b>) Zr + Nb + Ce + Y (ppm) vs. (Na<sub>2</sub>O + K<sub>2</sub>O)/CaO (after [<a href="#B35-applsci-14-02814" class="html-bibr">35</a>]). (<b>c</b>) The Zr vs. SiO<sub>2</sub> discrimination diagram for I- and A-type granitoid rocks [<a href="#B37-applsci-14-02814" class="html-bibr">37</a>]. (<b>d</b>) The ternary diagram of Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/(Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> + MgO)-3CaO-5(K<sub>2</sub>O/Na<sub>2</sub>O) (after [<a href="#B38-applsci-14-02814" class="html-bibr">38</a>]). The different fields represent the compositions of melts derived from a range of potential sources (tonalites, metasediments, and low- and high-K mafic rocks), determined by major element compositions of partial melts in experimental studies. (<b>e</b>) The Sr–Rb–Ba ternary plot for the studied granites (modified after [<a href="#B39-applsci-14-02814" class="html-bibr">39</a>]). (<b>f</b>) Molar CaO/(MgO + FeO<sub>total</sub>) vs. Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/(MgO + FeO<sub>total</sub>) (after [<a href="#B40-applsci-14-02814" class="html-bibr">40</a>]). Symbols as in <a href="#applsci-14-02814-f006" class="html-fig">Figure 6</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>(<b>a</b>) Rb/Sr ranges of the studied granitoid and associated pegmatites. (<b>b</b>) The Nb-Y-3Ga ternary diagram of [<a href="#B33-applsci-14-02814" class="html-bibr">33</a>]. Symbols as in <a href="#applsci-14-02814-f006" class="html-fig">Figure 6</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Pie charts illustrating the proportions of HREEs (Gd to Lu), LREEs (La to Sm), Zr, Y, and Nb in rare-metal peralkaline granites and related pegmatite in the Jabal Sayid and Dayheen areas.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Correlations between the contents of rare metals and Nb as an indicator of magma fractionation. The open diamond symbols represent the Dayheen pegmatites, closed diamond symbols represent the Jabal Sayid pegmatites, and other symbols as in <a href="#applsci-14-02814-f006" class="html-fig">Figure 6</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>A simplified model for the tectonomagmatic evolution of the juvenile crust in the Jabal Sayid and Dayheen areas, the western AS of Saudi Arabia. (<b>A</b>) The subduction of the oceanic crust, ophiolite detachment, and thrusting along the Bir Umq suture zone with the arc volcanism and arc-related plutonism of the granodiorite–diorite association. (<b>B</b>) The collisional phase, crustal anatexis, and monzogranite intrusions. (<b>C</b>) The partial melting of the crustal material leads to the generation of peralkaline granites and related pegmatites in post-collisional extension settings. The crust and mantle thickness are not to scale.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop