[go: up one dir, main page]

 
 
sensors-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Sensors for Wind Turbine Fault Diagnosis and Prognosis

A special issue of Sensors (ISSN 1424-8220). This special issue belongs to the section "Fault Diagnosis & Sensors".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (20 January 2023) | Viewed by 43728

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Mathematics, Escola d’Enginyeria de Barcelona Est (EEBE), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC), Campus Diagonal-Besòs (CDB), Eduard Maristany, 16, 08019 Barcelona, Spain
Interests: condition monitoring; data-based models; fault diagnosis; fault tolerant control; machine learning; structural health monitoring; sensors; wind turbines
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

To remain competitive, wind turbines must be reliable machines with efficient and effective maintenance strategies. Thus, it is essential to develop robust and cost-effective prognostic and health management strategies.

On the one hand, wind turbines generate a wealth of SCADA data from a variety of sensors, which can be effectively used to enable fault diagnosis and prognosis strategies. Data-driven techniques, based on machine or deep learning, are particularly promising in this field. Furthermore, this approach is cost-efficient and readily available as no extra equipment needs to be installed in the wind turbine. However, managing this large amount of data is a challenge as SCADA data is low-sampled data (10-min averaged data), gathered under a variety of operational modes and environmental conditions, and always subject to an external unknown excitation, the wind.

On the other hand, accurate prognosis and diagnosis of WT failures could rely on purpose-built condition monitoring (CM) systems. Vibration-based condition monitoring is a well-established strategy but it usually relies on high-sampled data (>10 kHz) leading to a large amount of data from a large number of sensors. Furthermore, for a CM system, the accuracy of data acquired from sensors has a pronounced impact on performance. Finding patterns in such multivariable datasets is a challenge under the aforementioned variety of operational modes and environmental conditions that wind turbines are subject to.

This Special Issue invites contributions that address wind turbine fault prognosis and diagnosis. In particular, submitted papers should clearly show novel contributions and innovative applications covering, but not limited to, any of the following topics around wind turbines:

  • Sensor selection
  • Sensor data processing
  • Prognostic and health management
  • Fault prognosis
  • Fault diagnosis
  • SCADA data
  • Condition monitoring
  • Data-driven models
  • Machine learning
  • Deep learning

Dr. Yolanda Vidal
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sensors is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (10 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

15 pages, 4258 KiB  
Article
Extreme-Low-Speed Heavy Load Bearing Fault Diagnosis by Using Improved RepVGG and Acoustic Emission Signals
by Peng Jiang, Wenyu Sun, Wei Li, Hongyu Wang and Cong Liu
Sensors 2023, 23(7), 3541; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23073541 - 28 Mar 2023
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2620
Abstract
With the worldwide carbon neutralization boom, low-speed heavy load bearings have been widely used in the field of wind power. Bearing failure generates impulses when the rolling element passes the cracked surface of the bearing. Over the past decade, acoustic emission (AE) techniques [...] Read more.
With the worldwide carbon neutralization boom, low-speed heavy load bearings have been widely used in the field of wind power. Bearing failure generates impulses when the rolling element passes the cracked surface of the bearing. Over the past decade, acoustic emission (AE) techniques have been used to detect failure signals. However, the high sampling rates of AE signals make it difficult to design and extract fault features; thus, deep neural network-based approaches have been proposed. In this paper, we proposed an improved RepVGG bearing fault diagnosis technique. The normalized and noise-reduced bearing signals were first converted into Mel frequency cepstrum coefficients (MFCCs) and then inputted into the model. In addition, the exponential moving average method was used to optimize the model and improve its accuracy. Data were extracted from the test bench and wind turbine main shaft bearing. Four damage classes were studied experimentally. The experimental results demonstrated that the improved RepVGG model could be employed for classifying low-speed heavy load bearing states by using MFCCs. Furthermore, the effectiveness of the proposed model was assessed by performing comparisons with existing models. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sensors for Wind Turbine Fault Diagnosis and Prognosis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Flowchart of the VMD-kurtosis denoising method. First, VMD decomposition is applied to the acoustic emission (AE) signal to convert the signal into eight IMFs. Next, the kurtosis factor value of each IMF is calculated. Finally, the IMF with kurtosis factor &gt; 3 is reconstructed.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Typical CNN network: LeNet-5.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>RepVGG network architecture. Left image: residual structure in ResNet. Middle image: training phase, using a similar multibranch residual structure inspired by ResNet. Right image: inference stage, converting all the network layers to Conv 3 × 3 through the reparameterization process. The rectified linear unit is a piecewise linear activation function that outputs the input directly if it is positive and zero otherwise [<a href="#B22-sensors-23-03541" class="html-bibr">22</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Bearing fault simulator: (<b>a</b>) diagram of the bearing fault simulator; (<b>b</b>) photographs of the bearing fault simulator.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>SKF 3519/560/HCYA6: (<b>a</b>) rolling element damage with 2 mm diameter and 0–5 mm depth; (<b>b</b>) multirolling element damage with 2 mm diameter and 0.5 mm depth.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The wind turbine spindle bearing on-line experimental setup.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>AE signals of the normal health state at 20 rpm and 100 kN radial load: (<b>a</b>) original signal; (<b>b</b>) signal after denoising; (<b>c</b>) MFCCs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>AE signals of the RE damage state at 20 rpm and 100 kN radial load: (<b>a</b>) original signal; (<b>b</b>) signal after denoising; (<b>c</b>) MFCCs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>AE signals of the OR damage state at 20 rpm and 100 kN radial load: (<b>a</b>) original signal; (<b>b</b>) signal after denoising; (<b>c</b>) MFCCs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>AE signals of the MRE damage state at 20 rpm and 100 kN radial load: (<b>a</b>) original signal; (<b>b</b>) signal after denoising; (<b>c</b>) MFCCs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Feature map in stage 4 of RepVGG: (<b>a</b>) RE damage; (<b>b</b>) OR damage; (<b>c</b>) MRE damage.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Loss functions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Test confusion matrix: (<b>a</b>) bearing fault simulator; (<b>b</b>) wind turbine spindle bearing.</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 6815 KiB  
Article
A Permanent Magnet Ferromagnetic Wear Debris Sensor Based on Axisymmetric High-Gradient Magnetic Field
by Bin Fan, Yong Liu, Peng Zhang, Lianfu Wang, Chao Zhang and Jianguo Wang
Sensors 2022, 22(21), 8282; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22218282 - 28 Oct 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1927
Abstract
The detection of wear debris in lubricating oil is effective for determining current equipment operating conditions for fault diagnosis. In this paper, a permanent magnet ferromagnetic wear debris sensor is proposed that is composed of a compact structure and a detection coil that [...] Read more.
The detection of wear debris in lubricating oil is effective for determining current equipment operating conditions for fault diagnosis. In this paper, a permanent magnet ferromagnetic wear debris sensor is proposed that is composed of a compact structure and a detection coil that generates an induced voltage when wear debris passes through a magnetic field. A three-dimensional model of the sensor is established, the internal axisymmetric high-gradient magnetic field of the sensor is analyzed, and a mathematical model of the sensor signal is proposed. The effects of the air gap structure of the sensor and the relative permeability, velocity, and volume of the wear debris on the sensor performance are analyzed. The correctness of the theoretical results is proven by single particle experiments, and the sensor is calibrated to achieve quantitative analysis of the wear debris. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sensors for Wind Turbine Fault Diagnosis and Prognosis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Structure of sensor: (<b>a</b>) structure, (<b>b</b>) sensor.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Static axisymmetric high-gradient static magnetic field analysis: (<b>a</b>) magnetic flux density in the axial direction and (<b>b</b>) magnetic flux density in the radial direction.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Magnetic flux density in the axial direction.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Mathematical model: (<b>a</b>) coordinate system when debris moving in the sensor; (<b>b</b>) induced voltage.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Three-dimensional simulation in ANSYS Maxwell: (<b>a</b>) structure; (<b>b</b>) cross section of simulation result.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Influence of the air gap distance on the magnetic field.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Influence of the chamfer on the magnetic field of the sensor: (<b>a</b>) 45° chamfer; (<b>b</b>) 60° chamfer; (<b>c</b>) 75° chamfer.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Influence of relative magnetic permeability.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Influence of wear debris volume.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Influence of wear debris velocity.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Single wear debris motion experimental rig.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Experimental verification for different air gap: (<b>a</b>) silicon steel sheet adjusts the air gap distance of the sensor; (<b>b</b>) the <span class="html-italic">V<sub>pp</sub></span> values of the induced voltage for different air gap.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Induced voltage of three kinds of metals.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>The <span class="html-italic">V<sub>pp</sub></span> values of the induced voltage versus volume.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>The <span class="html-italic">V<sub>pp</sub></span> values of the induced voltage versus velocity.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Comparison of experimental value and theoretical value.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Lube oil experiment: (<b>a</b>) wear debris monitoring test bench; (<b>b</b>) results obtained from the oil experiment.</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 8231 KiB  
Article
Compound Fault Diagnosis of a Wind Turbine Gearbox Based on MOMEDA and Parallel Parameter Optimized Resonant Sparse Decomposition
by Yang Feng, Xiangfeng Zhang, Hong Jiang and Jun Li
Sensors 2022, 22(20), 8017; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22208017 - 20 Oct 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 1974
Abstract
Wind turbines usually operate in harsh environments. The gearbox, the key component of the transmission chain in wind turbines, can easily be affected by multiple factors during the operation process and develop compound faults. Different types of faults can occur, coupled with each [...] Read more.
Wind turbines usually operate in harsh environments. The gearbox, the key component of the transmission chain in wind turbines, can easily be affected by multiple factors during the operation process and develop compound faults. Different types of faults can occur, coupled with each other and staggered interference. Thus, a challenge is to extract the fault characteristics from the composite fault signal to improve the reliability and the accuracy of compound fault diagnosis. To address the above problems, we propose a compound fault diagnosis method for wind turbine gearboxes based on multipoint optimal minimum entropy deconvolution adjusted (MOMEDA) and parallel parameter optimized resonant sparse decomposition (RSSD). Firstly, the MOMEDA is applied to the preprocess, setting the deconvolution period with different fault frequency types to eliminate the interference of the transmission path and environmental noise, while decoupling and separating the different types of single faults. Then, the RSSD method with parallel parameter optimization is applied for decomposing the preprocessed signal to obtain the low resonance components, further suppressing the interference components and enhancing the periodic fault characteristics. Finally, envelope demodulation of the enhanced signal is applied to extract the fault features and identify the different fault types. The effectiveness of the proposed method was verified using the actual data from the wind turbine gearbox. In addition, a comparison with some existing methods demonstrates the superiority of this method for decoupling composite fault characteristics. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sensors for Wind Turbine Fault Diagnosis and Prognosis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>TQWT synthesis filter bank.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The flow chart of the proposed paper.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Gearbox internal layout and nomenclature abbreviations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Gear and bearing failure pictures. (<b>a</b>) High-speed shaft pinion fault; (<b>b</b>) Intermediate speed shaft gear fault; (<b>c</b>) Bearing inner ring fault; (<b>d</b>) Bearing rollers fault.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4 Cont.
<p>Gear and bearing failure pictures. (<b>a</b>) High-speed shaft pinion fault; (<b>b</b>) Intermediate speed shaft gear fault; (<b>c</b>) Bearing inner ring fault; (<b>d</b>) Bearing rollers fault.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Composite fault signal of wind turbine gearbox and its frequency spectrum. (<b>a</b>) Time domain; (<b>b</b>) Fourier spectrum (<b>c</b>) 600–720 Hz spectrum amplification; (<b>d</b>) 1240–1400 Hz spectrum amplification; (<b>e</b>) Envelope spectrum.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5 Cont.
<p>Composite fault signal of wind turbine gearbox and its frequency spectrum. (<b>a</b>) Time domain; (<b>b</b>) Fourier spectrum (<b>c</b>) 600–720 Hz spectrum amplification; (<b>d</b>) 1240–1400 Hz spectrum amplification; (<b>e</b>) Envelope spectrum.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The RSSD optimized convergence curve.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The decoupled pinion vibration signal and its frequency spectrum: deconvolution results of MOMEDA: filtered time domain waveforms and their frequency spectrum (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>); Results obtained by MOMEDA and optimized RSSD: time domain waveforms and their frequency spectrum (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The decoupled gear vibration signal and its frequency spectrum: deconvolution results of MOMEDA: filtered time domain waveforms and their frequency spectrum (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>); Results obtained by MOMEDA and optimized RSSD: time domain waveforms and their frequency spectrum (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8 Cont.
<p>The decoupled gear vibration signal and its frequency spectrum: deconvolution results of MOMEDA: filtered time domain waveforms and their frequency spectrum (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>); Results obtained by MOMEDA and optimized RSSD: time domain waveforms and their frequency spectrum (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The decoupled bearing inner ring vibration signal and its frequency spectrum: deconvolution results of MOMEDA: filtered time domain waveforms and their frequency spectrum (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>); Results obtained by MOMEDA and optimized RSSD: time domain waveforms and their frequency spectrum (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>The decoupled bearing rollers vibration signal and its frequency spectrum: deconvolution results of MOMEDA: filtered time domain waveforms and their frequency spectrum (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>); results obtained by MOMEDA and optimized RSSD: time domain waveforms and their frequency spectrum (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The HSS pinion deconvolution results by MCKD: the filtered time domain waveform and their spectrum (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>); results obtained by MCKD + RSSD: time domain waveforms and their frequency spectrum (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>The RSSD optimized convergence curve of comparative method.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>The IMS gear deconvolution results by MCKD: the filtered time domain waveform and their spectrum (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>); the results obtained by MCKD + RSSD: the filtered time domain waveform and their spectrum (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>The bearing inner ring deconvolution results by MCKD: the filtered time domain waveform and their spectrum (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>); results obtained by MCKD + RSSD: time domain waveforms and their frequency spectrum (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>The bearing rollers deconvolution results by MCKD: the filtered time domain waveform and their spectrum (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>); results obtained by MCKD + RSSD: time domain waveforms and their frequency spectrum (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 15 Cont.
<p>The bearing rollers deconvolution results by MCKD: the filtered time domain waveform and their spectrum (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>); results obtained by MCKD + RSSD: time domain waveforms and their frequency spectrum (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>).</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 5367 KiB  
Article
A Probabilistic Bayesian Parallel Deep Learning Framework for Wind Turbine Bearing Fault Diagnosis
by Liang Meng, Yuanhao Su, Xiaojia Kong, Xiaosheng Lan, Yunfeng Li, Tongle Xu and Jinying Ma
Sensors 2022, 22(19), 7644; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22197644 - 9 Oct 2022
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 2145
Abstract
The technology of fault diagnosis helps improve the reliability of wind turbines. Difficulties in feature extraction and low confidence in diagnostic results are widespread in the process of deep learning-based fault diagnosis of wind turbine bearings. Therefore, a probabilistic Bayesian parallel deep learning [...] Read more.
The technology of fault diagnosis helps improve the reliability of wind turbines. Difficulties in feature extraction and low confidence in diagnostic results are widespread in the process of deep learning-based fault diagnosis of wind turbine bearings. Therefore, a probabilistic Bayesian parallel deep learning (BayesianPDL) framework is proposed and then achieves fault classification. A parallel deep learning (PDL) framework is proposed to solve the problem of difficult feature extraction of bearing faults. Next, the weights and biases in the PDL framework are converted from deterministic values to probability distributions. In this way, an uncertainty-aware method is explored to achieve reliable machine fault diagnosis. Taking the fault signal of the gearbox output shaft bearing of a wind turbine generator in a wind farm as an example, the diagnostic accuracy of the proposed method can reach 99.14%, and the confidence in diagnostic results is higher than other comparison methods. Experimental results show that the BayesianPDL framework has unique advantages in the fault diagnosis of wind turbine bearings. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sensors for Wind Turbine Fault Diagnosis and Prognosis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Parallel deep learning framework.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Parallel fusion residual block.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Fault diagnosis process of BayesianPDL framework.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Bayesian parallel deep learning framework.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Signal acquisition.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The time–frequency feature maps.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Comparison between different noisy vibration signals.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The accuracy of the BayesianPDL framework tested under different numbers of PFRBs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>BayesianPDL framework training process.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Total uncertainty distribution.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>ROC curves for different labels.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>The outer ring fault features identified by BayesianPDL framework. (<b>a</b>) input feature map; (<b>b</b>) identified feature map. (1) and (2) is the fault feature of the input. (3) and (4) is the identified fault feature.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>The testing diagnostic accuracy of different diagnostic methods.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>The accuracy convergence curves of different diagnostic methods.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Uncertainty distribution for different methods.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>F1-score for different labels.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Confusion matrix for different methods.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>T-SNE visualization of bearings.</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 1478 KiB  
Article
Data-Driven Assessment of Wind Turbine Performance Decline with Age and Interpretation Based on Comparative Test Case Analysis
by Davide Astolfi, Ravi Pandit, Ludovica Celesti, Matteo Vedovelli, Andrea Lombardi and Ludovico Terzi
Sensors 2022, 22(9), 3180; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22093180 - 21 Apr 2022
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 3879
Abstract
An increasing amount of wind turbines, especially in Europe, are reaching the end of their expected lifetimes; therefore, long data sets describing their operation are available for scholars to analyze the performance trends. On these grounds, the present work is devoted to test [...] Read more.
An increasing amount of wind turbines, especially in Europe, are reaching the end of their expected lifetimes; therefore, long data sets describing their operation are available for scholars to analyze the performance trends. On these grounds, the present work is devoted to test case studies for the evaluation and the interpretation of wind turbine performance decline with age. Two wind farms were studied, featuring widely employed wind turbine models: the former is composed of 6 Senvion MM92 and the latter of 11 Vestas V52 wind turbines, owned by the ENGIE Italia company. SCADA data spanning, respectively, 10 and 7 years were analyzed for the two test cases. The effect of aging on the performance of the test case wind turbines was studied by constructing a data-driven model of appropriate operation curves, selected depending on the working region. For the Senvion MM92, we found that it is questionable to talk about performance aging because there is no evident trend in time: the performance variation year by year is in the order of a few kW and is therefore irrelevant for practical applications. For the Vestas V52 wind turbines, a much wider variability is observed: two wind turbines are affected by a remarkable performance drop, after which the behavior is stable and under-performing with respect to the rest of the wind farm. Particular attention is devoted to the interpretation of the results: the comparative discussion of the two test cases indicates that the observed operation curves are compatible with the hypothesis that the worsening with age of the two under-performing Vestas V52 can be ascribed to the behavior of the hydraulic blade pitch. Furthermore, for both test cases, it is estimated that the gearbox-aging contributes negligibly to the performance decline in time. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sensors for Wind Turbine Fault Diagnosis and Prognosis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>A sample scatter and binned wind speed—rotor speed curve for WF1.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>A sample scatter and binned wind speed—rotor speed curve for WF2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>A sample scatter and binned wind speed–blade pitch curve for WF1.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>A sample scatter and binned wind speed–blade pitch curve for WF2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>A sample binned rotor speed–power curve in Region 2 for WF1: the curves are reported in the form of difference with respect to the year 2011.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>A sample binned blade pitch–power curve in Region 2 <math display="inline"><semantics> <mfrac bevelled="true"> <mn>1</mn> <mn>2</mn> </mfrac> </semantics></math> for WF1: the curves are reported in the form of difference with respect to the year 2011.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Average power curves for the year 2014: WF2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Average power curves for the year 2020: WF2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Binned generator speed–power curve in Region 2 for T01 in WF2: the curves are reported in the form of difference with respect to the year 2014.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Binned blade pitch–power (right) in Region 2 <math display="inline"><semantics> <mfrac bevelled="true"> <mn>1</mn> <mn>2</mn> </mfrac> </semantics></math> for T01 in WF2: the curves are reported in the form of difference with respect to the year 2014.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Binned generator speed–power curve in Region 2 for T02 in WF2: the curves are reported in the form of difference with respect to the year 2014.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Binned blade pitch–power (right) in Region 2 <math display="inline"><semantics> <mfrac bevelled="true"> <mn>1</mn> <mn>2</mn> </mfrac> </semantics></math> for T02 in WF2: the curves are reported in the form of difference with respect to the year 2014.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Binned wind speed–blade pitch curve for T01 in WF2: the curves are reported in the form of difference with respect to the year 2014.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Binned wind speed–blade pitch curve for T02 in WF2: the curves are reported in the form of difference with respect to the year 2014.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Binned rotor speed–blade pitch curve for T01 in WF2: the curves are reported in the form of difference with respect to the year 2014.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Binned rotor speed–blade pitch curve for T02 in WF2: the curves are reported in the form of difference with respect to the year 2014.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Average blade pitch in region for T01 and T02.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>The generator speed–power curve in Region 2 for the T01 wind turbine in WF2 during 2016 (left): data have been divided into 10 sub-periods.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>Residual between measurements and model estimates for T01 in WF2 for the year 2016 in Region 2, after being averaged for every 200 datapoints.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 8348 KiB  
Article
Unsupervised Damage Detection for Offshore Jacket Wind Turbine Foundations Based on an Autoencoder Neural Network
by Maria del Cisne Feijóo, Yovana Zambrano, Yolanda Vidal and Christian Tutivén
Sensors 2021, 21(10), 3333; https://doi.org/10.3390/s21103333 - 11 May 2021
Cited by 27 | Viewed by 4390
Abstract
Structural health monitoring for offshore wind turbine foundations is paramount to the further development of offshore fixed wind farms. At present time there are a limited number of foundation designs, the jacket type being the preferred one in large water depths. In this [...] Read more.
Structural health monitoring for offshore wind turbine foundations is paramount to the further development of offshore fixed wind farms. At present time there are a limited number of foundation designs, the jacket type being the preferred one in large water depths. In this work, a jacket-type foundation damage diagnosis strategy is stated. Normally, most or all the available data are of regular operation, thus methods that focus on the data leading to failures end up using only a small subset of the available data. Furthermore, when there is no historical precedent of a type of fault, those methods cannot be used. In addition, offshore wind turbines work under a wide variety of environmental conditions and regions of operation involving unknown input excitation given by the wind and waves. Taking into account the aforementioned difficulties, the stated strategy in this work is based on an autoencoder neural network model and its contribution is two-fold: (i) the proposed strategy is based only on healthy data, and (ii) it works under different operating and environmental conditions based only on the output vibration data gathered by accelerometer sensors. The proposed strategy has been tested through experimental laboratory tests on a scaled model. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sensors for Wind Turbine Fault Diagnosis and Prognosis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Fixed-type WT foundations [<a href="#B9-sensors-21-03333" class="html-bibr">9</a>]. Monopile (<b>a</b>), jacket (<b>b</b>), and gravity-based (<b>c</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Location of the sensors (accelerometers) in the structure [<a href="#B19-sensors-21-03333" class="html-bibr">19</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Damage location in the different levels of the jacket structure (<b>left</b>), [<a href="#B19-sensors-21-03333" class="html-bibr">19</a>]. Crack damage where <span class="html-italic">L</span> is the length of the bar, <span class="html-italic">d</span> = 5 mm is the crack size, and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>X</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mi>L</mi> <mo>/</mo> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> is the location of the crack in the bar (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Flowchart of the stated damage detection methodology.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Autoencoder proposed architecture. There are 3 inputs (mean, standard deviation, and entropy) for each one of the 24 sensors giving a total of 72 inputs. The hidden layer is set to 30 nodes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Mean squared error of training and validation data sets.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>RE for test samples corresponding to amplitude 0.5 (<b>left</b>) and zoom in the region with y-axis from 0 to 6 (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>RE for test samples corresponding to amplitude 1 (<b>left</b>) and zoom in the region with y-axis from 0 to 7 (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>RE for test samples corresponding to amplitude 2 (<b>left</b>) and zoom in the region with y-axis from 0 to 6 (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 6062 KiB  
Article
Wind Turbine Main Bearing Fault Prognosis Based Solely on SCADA Data
by Ángel Encalada-Dávila, Bryan Puruncajas, Christian Tutivén and Yolanda Vidal
Sensors 2021, 21(6), 2228; https://doi.org/10.3390/s21062228 - 23 Mar 2021
Cited by 62 | Viewed by 10657
Abstract
As stated by the European Academy of Wind Energy (EAWE), the wind industry has identified main bearing failures as a critical issue in terms of increasing wind turbine reliability and availability. This is owing to major repairs with high replacement costs and long [...] Read more.
As stated by the European Academy of Wind Energy (EAWE), the wind industry has identified main bearing failures as a critical issue in terms of increasing wind turbine reliability and availability. This is owing to major repairs with high replacement costs and long downtime periods associated with main bearing failures. Thus, the main bearing fault prognosis has become an economically relevant topic and is a technical challenge. In this work, a data-based methodology for fault prognosis is presented. The main contributions of this work are as follows: (i) Prognosis is achieved by using only supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) data, which is already available in all industrial-sized wind turbines; thus, no extra sensors that are designed for a specific purpose need to be installed. (ii) The proposed method only requires healthy data to be collected; thus, it can be applied to any wind farm even when no faulty data has been recorded. (iii) The proposed algorithm works under different and varying operating and environmental conditions. (iv) The validity and performance of the established methodology is demonstrated on a real underproduction wind farm consisting of 12 wind turbines. The obtained results show that advanced prognostic systems based solely on SCADA data can predict failures several months prior to their occurrence and allow wind turbine operators to plan their operations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sensors for Wind Turbine Fault Diagnosis and Prognosis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Main components of the wind turbine (WT) [<a href="#B24-sensors-21-02228" class="html-bibr">24</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Spherical roller main bearing used in WTs. Courtesy of SKF.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Fatigue failure. Subsurface-initiated (<b>left</b>) and surface-initiated (<b>right</b>) [<a href="#B27-sensors-21-02228" class="html-bibr">27</a>]. Courtesy of SKF.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Wear failure. Abrasive wear (<b>left</b>) and adhesive wear (<b>right</b>) [<a href="#B27-sensors-21-02228" class="html-bibr">27</a>]. Courtesy of SKF.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Corrosion failures. Moisture (<b>left</b>), fretting (<b>middle</b>), and brinelling (<b>right</b>) [<a href="#B27-sensors-21-02228" class="html-bibr">27</a>]. Courtesy of SKF.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Electrical erosion failures. Excessive current (<b>left</b>) and current leakage (<b>right</b>) [<a href="#B27-sensors-21-02228" class="html-bibr">27</a>]. Courtesy of SKF.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Plastic deformation failure. Overload (<b>left</b>) and indentation (<b>right</b>) [<a href="#B27-sensors-21-02228" class="html-bibr">27</a>]. Courtesy of SKF.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Fracture failure. Forced (<b>left</b>) and fatigue (<b>right</b>) [<a href="#B27-sensors-21-02228" class="html-bibr">27</a>]. Courtesy of SKF.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Plot example of the selected supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) variables used to develop the normality model. All of them are related to the mean value over a 10-min period.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Out-of-range values are detected as outliers (red crosses) and assigned as missing values from the raw signal.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Low-speed shaft temperature raw data (without outliers) versus imputed data (<b>top</b>) and zoom in of the imputed data (<b>bottom</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11 Cont.
<p>Low-speed shaft temperature raw data (without outliers) versus imputed data (<b>top</b>) and zoom in of the imputed data (<b>bottom</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>WT2 (WT number 2 in the wind farm) data for training and test.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>ANN model with 14 inputs, 72 neurons in the hidden layer, and 1 output.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Minimization of the MSE, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>E</mi> <mo>(</mo> <mi>w</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>b</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math>, during training of WT1 (<b>left</b>). Error histogram with 20 bins of final training error over all training samples for WT1 (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Values at each training epoch iteration for the gradient, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msup> <mi>J</mi> <mi>T</mi> </msup> <mi>r</mi> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi>β</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </semantics></math>, damping parameter, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>μ</mi> </semantics></math>, and effective number of parameters, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>γ</mi> </semantics></math>, for WT1.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>(<b>a</b>) ANN predicted value (<math display="inline"><semantics> <mover accent="true"> <mi>T</mi> <mo>^</mo> </mover> </semantics></math>) and target (<span class="html-italic">T</span>) value for WT1 over the train dataset. (<b>b</b>) ANN predicted value (<math display="inline"><semantics> <mover accent="true"> <mi>T</mi> <mo>^</mo> </mover> </semantics></math>) and target (<span class="html-italic">T</span>) value for WT1 over the test dataset. (<b>c</b>) Absolute difference value between the prediction and estimation, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mrow> <mo>|</mo> <mi>T</mi> <mo>−</mo> </mrow> <mover accent="true"> <mi>T</mi> <mo>^</mo> </mover> <mrow> <mo>|</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </semantics></math>, for WT1 over the train dataset. (<b>d</b>) Absolute difference value between the prediction and estimation, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mrow> <mo>|</mo> <mi>T</mi> <mo>−</mo> </mrow> <mover accent="true"> <mi>T</mi> <mo>^</mo> </mover> <mrow> <mo>|</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </semantics></math>, for WT1 over the test dataset. (<b>e</b>) ANN predicted value (<math display="inline"><semantics> <mover accent="true"> <mi>T</mi> <mo>^</mo> </mover> </semantics></math>) and target (<span class="html-italic">T</span>) value for WT2 over the train dataset. (<b>f</b>) ANN predicted value (<math display="inline"><semantics> <mover accent="true"> <mi>T</mi> <mo>^</mo> </mover> </semantics></math>) and target (<span class="html-italic">T</span>) value for WT2 over the test dataset. (<b>g</b>) Absolute difference value between the prediction and estimation, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mrow> <mo>|</mo> <mi>T</mi> <mo>−</mo> </mrow> <mover accent="true"> <mi>T</mi> <mo>^</mo> </mover> <mrow> <mo>|</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </semantics></math>, for WT2 over the train dataset. (<b>h</b>) Absolute difference value between the prediction and estimation, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mrow> <mo>|</mo> <mi>T</mi> <mo>−</mo> </mrow> <mover accent="true"> <mi>T</mi> <mo>^</mo> </mover> <mrow> <mo>|</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </semantics></math>, for WT2 over the test dataset.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>ANN indicator values (blue line) for test data, and threshold (red line).</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 2638 KiB  
Article
An Ensemble Learning Solution for Predictive Maintenance of Wind Turbines Main Bearing
by Mattia Beretta, Anatole Julian, Jose Sepulveda, Jordi Cusidó and Olga Porro
Sensors 2021, 21(4), 1512; https://doi.org/10.3390/s21041512 - 22 Feb 2021
Cited by 29 | Viewed by 5638
Abstract
A novel and innovative solution addressing wind turbines’ main bearing failure predictions using SCADA data is presented. This methodology enables to cut setup times and has more flexible requirements when compared to the current predictive algorithms. The proposed solution is entirely unsupervised as [...] Read more.
A novel and innovative solution addressing wind turbines’ main bearing failure predictions using SCADA data is presented. This methodology enables to cut setup times and has more flexible requirements when compared to the current predictive algorithms. The proposed solution is entirely unsupervised as it does not require the labeling of data through work orders logs. Results of interpretable algorithms, which are tailored to capture specific aspects of main bearing failures, are merged into a combined health status indicator making use of Ensemble Learning principles. Based on multiple specialized indicators, the interpretability of the results is greater compared to black-box solutions that try to address the problem with a single complex algorithm. The proposed methodology has been tested on a dataset covering more than two year of operations from two onshore wind farms, counting a total of 84 turbines. All four main bearing failures are anticipated at least one month of time in advance. Combining individual indicators into a composed one proved effective with regard to all the tracked metrics. Accuracy of 95.1%, precision of 24.5% and F1 score of 38.5% are obtained averaging the values across the two windfarms. The encouraging results, the unsupervised nature and the flexibility and scalability of the proposed solution are appealing, making it particularly attractive for any online monitoring system used on single wind farms as well as entire wind turbine fleets. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sensors for Wind Turbine Fault Diagnosis and Prognosis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Timeseries profiles of the main bearing temperature of a faulty turbine and the average of the wind-farm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>A</b>) Relation between main bearing temperature and wind speed. (<b>B</b>) Probability density plot of the main bearing temperature of a faulty turbine and the average of the wind-farm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Diagram of the predictive maintenance solution.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>A</b>) The rolling window train/test scheme used for normality models. (<b>B</b>) The rolling window train/test scheme used for mean and anomaly indicators.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Boxplot of the main bearing temperature. The median is represented by the red line and the mean corresponds to the triangle.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>A</b>) Normality indicator, RMSE by turbine. (<b>B</b>) Timeseries comparison of predicted versus measured value.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>(<b>A</b>) Anomaly Indicator plots: percentage of anomalous versus total number of points. (<b>B</b>) 3D plot showing normal (blue) versus anomalous (red) points.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Composed indicator calculation scheme and decision threshold setting.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Relation between KPIs and decision threshold value by wind-farm and indicator.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>(<b>A</b>) Performance comparison of individual and composed indicators for Windfarm 1 and (<b>B</b>) Windfarm 2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Scatter-plot of each pair combination of basic indicator.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Correlation matrix of the base indicators.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Heatmap of the combined main bearing health status indicator for wind farm 1. Failures are represented by a yellow star.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Heatmap of the combined main bearing health status indicator for wind farm 2. Failures are repersented by a yellow star.</p>
Full article ">
33 pages, 9872 KiB  
Article
Entropy Indicators: An Approach for Low-Speed Bearing Diagnosis
by Diego Sandoval, Urko Leturiondo, Yolanda Vidal and Francesc Pozo
Sensors 2021, 21(3), 849; https://doi.org/10.3390/s21030849 - 27 Jan 2021
Cited by 21 | Viewed by 3932
Abstract
To increase the competitiveness of wind energy, the maintenance costs of offshore floating and fixed wind turbines need to be reduced. One strategy is the enhancement of the condition monitoring techniques for pitch bearings, because their low operational speed and the high loads [...] Read more.
To increase the competitiveness of wind energy, the maintenance costs of offshore floating and fixed wind turbines need to be reduced. One strategy is the enhancement of the condition monitoring techniques for pitch bearings, because their low operational speed and the high loads applied to them make their monitoring challenging. Vibration analysis has been widely used for monitoring the bearing condition with good results obtained for regular bearings, but with difficulties when the operational speed decreases. Therefore, new techniques are required to enhance the capabilities of vibration analysis for bearings under such operational conditions. This study proposes the use of indicators based on entropy for monitoring a low-speed bearing condition. The indicators used are approximate, dispersion, singular value decomposition, and spectral entropy of the permutation entropy. This approach has been tested with vibration signals acquired in a test rig with bearings under different health conditions. The results show that entropy indicators (EIs) can discriminate with higher-accuracy damaged bearings for low-speed bearings compared with the regular indicators. Furthermore, it is shown that the combination of regular and entropy-based indicators can also contribute to a more reliable diagnosis. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sensors for Wind Turbine Fault Diagnosis and Prognosis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Offshore wind turbines. (<b>a</b>) Wind turbine over a fixed foundation [<a href="#B14-sensors-21-00849" class="html-bibr">14</a>]. (<b>b</b>) Floating offshore wind turbine assembly [<a href="#B15-sensors-21-00849" class="html-bibr">15</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Test rig for low-speed bearings: (<b>a</b>) General view of the test rig [<a href="#B74-sensors-21-00849" class="html-bibr">74</a>]. The position of the upper support disc is highlighted with a green arrow. (<b>b</b>) Detail of the surface of the upper support disc. The position of the sensor is highlighted with a green arrow. (<b>c</b>) Damage seeded on shaft washers. (<b>d</b>) Damage seeded on ball bearings.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Diagram of the algorithm of approximate entropy (AppEn).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Diagram of the algorithm of dispersion entropy (DisEn).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Diagram of the singular value decomposition entropy (SvdEn) computation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Diagram of the signal analysis procedure for spectral entropy of the permutation entropy signal SepEn [<a href="#B74-sensors-21-00849" class="html-bibr">74</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Diagram of proposed fault diagnosis method for vibration signals of low-speed bearings. (<b>a</b>) Values for general method. (<b>b</b>) Diagram to detail the training and validation of the random forest model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Approximate entropy (AppEn) calculation for bearing signal corresponding to healthy scenario HS with <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>m</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>5</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>r</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.2</mn> <mo>×</mo> <mi>σ</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>, and varying <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>W</mi> <mi>s</mi> </msub> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Comparison of the approximate entropy (AppEn) mean value for several bearing signals at the same rotational speed. The calculation uses <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>r</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.2</mn> <mo>×</mo> <mi>σ</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>W</mi> <mi>s</mi> </msub> <mo>=</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math> 10,240, and varying <span class="html-italic">m</span>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Comparison of dispersion entropy (DisEn) mean value for several bearing signals at same rotational speed, with fixed <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>W</mi> <mi>s</mi> </msub> <mo>=</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math> 10,240. (<b>a</b>) Values for fixed <span class="html-italic">m</span> = 6, varying <span class="html-italic">c</span>. (<b>b</b>) Values for fixed c = 4, varying <span class="html-italic">m</span>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Comparison of the single value decomposition entropy (SvdEn) mean value for several bearing signals at the same rotational speed, with fixed <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>W</mi> <mi>s</mi> </msub> <mo>=</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math>10,240.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Comparison of the permutation entropy PerEn signal calculated for 30 s of a large raceway shaft washer damage scenario RL signal, with fixed <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>W</mi> <mi>s</mi> </msub> <mo>=</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math>10,240.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Confusion matrices for the diagnosis of low-speed bearings using random forest classifier, varying the indicator type and the rotational speed of the data. The results were normalized over the true labels. The first row shows the results at 10 rpm, the second row at 8 rpm, and the last row at 5 rpm. The first column shows the results for classic indicators (CIs), second column for entropy indicators (EIs), and the last column shows the classic and entropy indicators (CEIs). (<b>a</b>) Confusion matrix for CIs and data at 10 rpm. (<b>b</b>) Confusion matrix for EIs and data at 10 rpm. (<b>c</b>) Confusion matrix for CEIs with data at 10 rpm. (<b>d</b>) Confusion matrix for CIs and data at 8 rpm. (<b>e</b>) Confusion matrix for EIs and data at 8 rpm. (<b>f</b>) Confusion matrix for CEIs and data at 8 rpm. (<b>g</b>) Confusion matrix for CIs and data at 5 rpm. (<b>h</b>) Confusion matrix for EIs and data at 5 rpm. (<b>i</b>) Confusion matrix for CEIs and data at 5 rpm.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 37699 KiB  
Article
Development of a Linear Acoustic Array for Aero-Acoustic Quantification of Camber-Bladed Vertical Axis Wind Turbine
by Abdul Hadi Butt, Bilal Akbar, Jawad Aslam, Naveed Akram, Manzoore Elahi M Soudagar, Fausto Pedro García Márquez, Md. Yamin Younis and Emad Uddin
Sensors 2020, 20(20), 5954; https://doi.org/10.3390/s20205954 - 21 Oct 2020
Cited by 13 | Viewed by 3936
Abstract
Vertical axis wind turbines (VAWT) are a source of renewable energy and are used for both industrial and domestic purposes. The study of noise characteristics of a VAWT is an important performance parameter for the turbine. This study focuses on the development of [...] Read more.
Vertical axis wind turbines (VAWT) are a source of renewable energy and are used for both industrial and domestic purposes. The study of noise characteristics of a VAWT is an important performance parameter for the turbine. This study focuses on the development of a linear microphone array and measuring acoustic signals on a cambered five-bladed 45 W VAWT in an anechoic chamber at different tip speed ratios. The sound pressure level spectrum of VAWT shows that tonal noises such as blade passing frequencies dominate at lower frequencies whereas broadband noise corresponds to all audible ranges of frequencies. This study shows that the major portion of noise from the source is dominated by aerodynamic noises generated due to vortex generation and trailing edge serrations. The research also predicts that dynamic stall is evident in the lower Tip speed ratio (TSR) region making smaller TSR values unsuitable for a quiet VAWT. This paper compares the results of linear aeroacoustic array with a 128-MEMS acoustic camera with higher resolution. The study depicts a 3 dB margin between two systems at lower TSR values. The research approves the usage of the 8 mic linear array for small radius rotary machinery considering the results comparison with a NORSONIC camera and its resolution. These observations serve as a basis for noise reduction and blade optimization techniques. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sensors for Wind Turbine Fault Diagnosis and Prognosis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Experimental configuration of NUST Anechoic Chamber.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) Acoustic carpet sheet linear array (<b>b</b>) NORSONIC camera.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Linear microphone array placed in front of SAV-45 vertical axis wind turbine (VAWT).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>SAV-45 VAWT Schematic.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Microphone array mid rotor configuration.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Broadside linear array resolution at 1 KHz.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Array Hardware Topology.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>In-house code structure.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Frequency spectrum for five-bladed VAWT at axial distance of 30 mm, 60 mm and 90 mm from microphone array (TSR 0.79).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Frequency spectrum at three different TSR values at 60 mm axial location from source.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Frequency spectrum of SAV-45 using acoustic camera for three TSR values.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Frequency spectrum (NORSONIC camera—blue) and (microphone array—red).</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Error quantification spectrum for linear array compared to NORSONIC Camera.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Data validation. Red–CFD simulation; blue–Weber’s experiment; green–SAV-45 array.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Data validation with Pearson three-bladed VAWT (TSR Variation).</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop