[go: up one dir, main page]

 
 
entropy-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Information Theory Applied to Physiological Signals

A special issue of Entropy (ISSN 1099-4300). This special issue belongs to the section "Information Theory, Probability and Statistics".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 September 2017) | Viewed by 129469

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Brain Science Institute, RIKEN, Japan

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Rey Institute for Nonlinear Dynamics in Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Information theory is a well-known methodology, traditionally used in communication engineering, and has relatively recently been extended and applied to a variety of emerging areas, including bioengineering. Conceptually, physiological systems can be considered as communication channels of a special kind, which admit the information content can be analysed; this concept has been particularly successful in the analysis of neural systems. Information theory has also been traditionally applied to systems which require well-defined metrics for quantifying their dynamic behaviours, or for quantifying their degrees of nonlinearity and complexity.

Signal analyses, based on information theory, have typically taken the form of entropy, probability, and divergence analyses. In this Special Issue, we consider the most widely analysed physiological signals, such as electrocardiograms (ECG), electroencephalograms (EEG), electromyograms (EMG), electrooculograms (EOG), and respiratory signals. The application of information theory principles to physiological signals has undoubtedly shed light on the intrinsic dynamics and mechanisms underlying many physiological systems, consequently elucidating interactions that would not have been possible using temporal or spectral analyses alone.

With the understanding of the mechanisms governing many physiological systems still remaining a challenge, information theory based analyses are likely to continue to substantially aid in the comprehensive understanding of the physiology and signal generating mechanism. Another challenge is to develop information theoretic measures for real-world physiological data which are notoriously noisy, with drifting baselines, and which do not obey any synthetic probability distribution.

The main goal of this Special Issue is, therefore, to disseminate new and original research based on information theory analyses of physiological signals, in order to assist in both the understanding of physiological phenomena, diagnosis and treatment, and for planning healthcare strategies to prevent the occurrences of certain pathologies. Furthermore, manuscripts summarizing the most recent state-of-the-art of this topic will also be welcome.

Prof. Dr. Danilo P. Mandic
Prof. Dr. Andrzej Cichocki
Prof. Dr. Chung-Kang Peng
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Entropy is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Joint analysis of physiological signals at multiple temporal, frequency, and spatial scales (ECG, EEG, EMG EOG, etc.)
  • Multiscale entropy, complexity loss theory for the monitoring and management of diseases
  • Entropy or information content for data fusion from recordings of different natures
  • Computationally efficient entropy measures for physiological data
  • Kullback-Leibler divergence, other divergences applied to physiological monitoring
  • Extensions to symbolic dynamics and coding in biological systems
  • Practical considerations: entropic scales and embedding dimensions, sample size, signal modality characterization for health
  • Levels of consciousness, fatigue, fitness for duty
  • Heart rate variability (HRV) analysis, co-morbidity between HRV and other physiological responses
  • Psychophysiological signals (physical/mental/emotional analysis), especially in newborns and the elderly
  • Complexity loss theory in dementia, epilepsy, posture, and sleep disorders
  • Other clinical applications of multiscale entropy

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Related Special Issue

Published Papers (19 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

12 pages, 2625 KiB  
Article
Information Theoretic-Based Interpretation of a Deep Neural Network Approach in Diagnosing Psychogenic Non-Epileptic Seizures
by Sara Gasparini, Maurizio Campolo, Cosimo Ieracitano, Nadia Mammone, Edoardo Ferlazzo, Chiara Sueri, Giovanbattista Gaspare Tripodi, Umberto Aguglia and Francesco Carlo Morabito
Entropy 2018, 20(2), 43; https://doi.org/10.3390/e20020043 - 23 Jan 2018
Cited by 35 | Viewed by 5163
Abstract
The use of a deep neural network scheme is proposed to help clinicians solve a difficult diagnosis problem in neurology. The proposed multilayer architecture includes a feature engineering step (from time-frequency transformation), a double compressing stage trained by unsupervised learning, and a classification [...] Read more.
The use of a deep neural network scheme is proposed to help clinicians solve a difficult diagnosis problem in neurology. The proposed multilayer architecture includes a feature engineering step (from time-frequency transformation), a double compressing stage trained by unsupervised learning, and a classification stage trained by supervised learning. After fine-tuning, the deep network is able to discriminate well the class of patients from controls with around 90% sensitivity and specificity. This deep model gives better classification performance than some other standard discriminative learning algorithms. As in clinical problems there is a need for explaining decisions, an effort has been carried out to qualitatively justify the classification results. The main novelty of this paper is indeed to give an entropic interpretation of how the deep scheme works and reach the final decision. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Information Theory Applied to Physiological Signals)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>A</b>) The flowchart of the method: (a) The 19-channels electroencephalography (EEG) recording is partitioned into M = 20 non-overlapping epochs (of 5 s width), (b) given an epoch, the time frequency map (TFM) is estimated over each channel. The <span class="html-italic">i</span>-th TFM (<span class="html-italic">i</span> = 1, …, 19) is partitioned into three sub-bands (<math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mi>S</mi> <msub> <mi>B</mi> <mi>j</mi> </msub> </mrow> </semantics> </math> <span class="html-italic">j</span> = 1, 2, 3); then, the mean (<span class="html-italic">µ</span>), standard deviation (<span class="html-italic">σ</span>), and skewness (<span class="html-italic">ν</span>) of the wavelet coefficients are evaluated for each <span class="html-italic">SB</span> and for the whole TFM. Once the TFMs are computed on the M = 20 epochs, a database of 20 × 12 × 19 data (#epochs × #features × #channels) is generated, (c) The vectors of 228 features are the input of a 2-stacked autoencoders (SAE) architecture. The last softmax layer performs the 2-way classification task (CNT-PNES); (<b>B</b>) The two Autoencodes (AE) implemented: the first AE compresses the 228 input features to 50 parameters (encoder stage) and then attempts to reconstruct the input (decoder stage); whereas, the second AE compresses the 50 features output of the first AE to 20 latent parameters. The compressed representations H<sub>1</sub> (50 × 1) and H<sub>2</sub> (20 × 1) (indicated in red and green, respectively) are used in the stacked autoencoders architecture.</p>
Full article ">Figure 1 Cont.
<p>(<b>A</b>) The flowchart of the method: (a) The 19-channels electroencephalography (EEG) recording is partitioned into M = 20 non-overlapping epochs (of 5 s width), (b) given an epoch, the time frequency map (TFM) is estimated over each channel. The <span class="html-italic">i</span>-th TFM (<span class="html-italic">i</span> = 1, …, 19) is partitioned into three sub-bands (<math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mi>S</mi> <msub> <mi>B</mi> <mi>j</mi> </msub> </mrow> </semantics> </math> <span class="html-italic">j</span> = 1, 2, 3); then, the mean (<span class="html-italic">µ</span>), standard deviation (<span class="html-italic">σ</span>), and skewness (<span class="html-italic">ν</span>) of the wavelet coefficients are evaluated for each <span class="html-italic">SB</span> and for the whole TFM. Once the TFMs are computed on the M = 20 epochs, a database of 20 × 12 × 19 data (#epochs × #features × #channels) is generated, (c) The vectors of 228 features are the input of a 2-stacked autoencoders (SAE) architecture. The last softmax layer performs the 2-way classification task (CNT-PNES); (<b>B</b>) The two Autoencodes (AE) implemented: the first AE compresses the 228 input features to 50 parameters (encoder stage) and then attempts to reconstruct the input (decoder stage); whereas, the second AE compresses the 50 features output of the first AE to 20 latent parameters. The compressed representations H<sub>1</sub> (50 × 1) and H<sub>2</sub> (20 × 1) (indicated in red and green, respectively) are used in the stacked autoencoders architecture.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Time frequency representation of the psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES) and healthy control (CNT). Each epoch of the 19-channels electroencephalography (EEG) is transformed in a time frequency map (TFM); then, the mean over the 19 channels, over the subjects and over the epochs is evaluated coming up with a single TFM per class. (<b>a</b>) TFM averaged over the 19 channels, the 20 epochs, and the six PNES subjects; (<b>b</b>) TFM averaged over 19 channels, the 20 epochs, and the 10 CNT subjects.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Softmax output representation of PNES (<b>a</b>) and CNT (<b>b</b>) for the 20 leave-one-out testing sessions carried out for every subject. Each bin represents the output estimated by the softmax layer ranged between 0 and 1 (1 correct classification; 0 misclassification). The red dotted line is the average output level of the network, evaluated over the 20 sessions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Entropy representation of PNES (red dots) and CNT (blue dots) evaluated at the outputs of the hidden nodes of the two compressed representations. (<b>a</b>) Entropy values related to PNES and CNT features extracted from the first AE (50 × 1). At this stage, the entropies of the two classes are comparable; (<b>b</b>) Entropy values related to PNES and CNT features extracted from the second AE (20 × 1). At this stage, the entropies decrease and they are different for the two classes and generally greater for PNES than CNT.</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 1072 KiB  
Article
Characterizing Normal and Pathological Gait through Permutation Entropy
by Massimiliano Zanin, David Gómez-Andrés, Irene Pulido-Valdeolivas, Juan Andrés Martín-Gonzalo, Javier López-López, Samuel Ignacio Pascual-Pascual and Estrella Rausell
Entropy 2018, 20(1), 77; https://doi.org/10.3390/e20010077 - 19 Jan 2018
Cited by 18 | Viewed by 6091
Abstract
Cerebral palsy is a physical impairment stemming from a brain lesion at perinatal time, most of the time resulting in gait abnormalities: the first cause of severe disability in childhood. Gait study, and instrumental gait analysis in particular, has been receiving increasing attention [...] Read more.
Cerebral palsy is a physical impairment stemming from a brain lesion at perinatal time, most of the time resulting in gait abnormalities: the first cause of severe disability in childhood. Gait study, and instrumental gait analysis in particular, has been receiving increasing attention in the last few years, for being the complex result of the interactions between different brain motor areas and thus a proxy in the understanding of the underlying neural dynamics. Yet, and in spite of its importance, little is still known about how the brain adapts to cerebral palsy and to its impaired gait and, consequently, about the best strategies for mitigating the disability. In this contribution, we present the hitherto first analysis of joint kinematics data using permutation entropy, comparing cerebral palsy children with a set of matched control subjects. We find a significant increase in the permutation entropy for the former group, thus indicating a more complex and erratic neural control of joints and a non-trivial relationship between the permutation entropy and the gait speed. We further show how this information theory measure can be used to train a data mining model able to forecast the child’s condition. We finally discuss the relevance of these results in clinical applications and specifically in the design of personalized medicine interventions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Information Theory Applied to Physiological Signals)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Probability distributions of the Permutation Entropy (PE), as calculated in control subjects and Cerebral Palsy (CP) patients, the latter including aggregated and disaggregated (w.r.t. the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) scale) results. Rows, from top to bottom, respectively correspond to pelvis, hip, knee, ankle and forefoot; columns, from left to right, to the abduction-adduction, sagittal and rotational axes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Forest plots showing the beta coefficients of linear mixed models comparing gait PE values according to the patient’s GMFCS level. Squares represent the mean value of each beta coefficient and horizontal lines the corresponding <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mn>95</mn> <mo>%</mo> </mrow> </semantics> </math> bias-corrected and accelerated bootstrap intervals. See main text and <a href="#sec4dot3-entropy-20-00077" class="html-sec">Section 4.3</a> for details.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Permutation entropy as a function of the normalized walking speed, for control subjects (black dots) and CP patients (red dots). Each panel corresponds to the same joint/axis as in <a href="#entropy-20-00077-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Forest plots showing the beta coefficients of linear mixed models comparing gait PE values according to normalized walking speed (left panel), condition (using healthy as the reference, central panel) and the interaction of normalized walking speed with condition (right panel). The magnitudes of the effects are indicated on the X axis. Squares represent the mean values of each beta coefficient and horizontal lines the corresponding <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mn>95</mn> <mo>%</mo> </mrow> </semantics> </math> bias-corrected and accelerated bootstrap intervals. See <a href="#sec4dot3-entropy-20-00077" class="html-sec">Section 4.3</a> for further details.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Forest plots showing the beta coefficients of linear mixed models that measure the effect of PE on the Gait Deviation Index (GDI, left), the Global Profile Score (GPS, center) and elements of the Movement Analysis Profile (MAP, right). The magnitudes of the effects are indicated in the X axis. Squares represent the mean values of each beta coefficient and horizontal lines the corresponding <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mn>95</mn> <mo>%</mo> </mrow> </semantics> </math> bias-corrected and accelerated bootstrap intervals. See <a href="#sec4dot3-entropy-20-00077" class="html-sec">Section 4.3</a> for further details.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(Top) Multi-scale PE, for control subjects (black lines) and CP patients (red lines), as a function of the down-sampling <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mi>υ</mi> </semantics> </math>; see <a href="#sec4dot2dot2-entropy-20-00077" class="html-sec">Section 4.2.2</a> for details. Each panel corresponds to the same joint/axis as in <a href="#entropy-20-00077-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a>. (Bottom) <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mo>Δ</mo> </semantics> </math>MSE for all joint/axis pairs; see Equation (<a href="#FD1-entropy-20-00077" class="html-disp-formula">1</a>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Classifying patients according to their gait entropy. The left panel depicts the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve (blue solid line), obtained through a random forest model; the dashed grey line represents the result obtained by a random classification. The right panel depicts the drop in the Area Under the Curve (AUC) when individual features (joint/axis pairs) are deleted from the dataset; the higher the value, the more important is the considered feature.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Random forest classification of the patients’ GMFCS stage according to the PE of the joint time series. The left panel shows the importance of the individual features. The higher the value in the X axis of the left panel, the more important the corresponding feature is for an accurate classification. Importance is estimated according to the increase in the classification error when this feature is randomly permuted. The right panels show the adjusted class probability for healthy, GMFCS I, GMFCS II, GMFCS III and GMFCS IV stages according to an RF classification. In the X axis, values of PE of hip flexion (upper plot) and ankle flexion (lower plot) are shown. Different values presented in the split are shown by a small mark in the axis. The left Y axis of the panel indicates the adjusted class probability, while the right one shows the proportion of cycles of the different classes.</p>
Full article ">
3283 KiB  
Article
Normalised Mutual Information of High-Density Surface Electromyography during Muscle Fatigue
by Adrian Bingham, Sridhar P. Arjunan, Beth Jelfs and Dinesh K. Kumar
Entropy 2017, 19(12), 697; https://doi.org/10.3390/e19120697 - 20 Dec 2017
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 6240
Abstract
This study has developed a technique for identifying the presence of muscle fatigue based on the spatial changes of the normalised mutual information (NMI) between multiple high density surface electromyography (HD-sEMG) channels. Muscle fatigue in the tibialis anterior (TA) during isometric contractions at [...] Read more.
This study has developed a technique for identifying the presence of muscle fatigue based on the spatial changes of the normalised mutual information (NMI) between multiple high density surface electromyography (HD-sEMG) channels. Muscle fatigue in the tibialis anterior (TA) during isometric contractions at 40% and 80% maximum voluntary contraction levels was investigated in ten healthy participants (Age range: 21 to 35 years; Mean age = 26 years; Male = 4, Female = 6). HD-sEMG was used to record 64 channels of sEMG using a 16 by 4 electrode array placed over the TA. The NMI of each electrode with every other electrode was calculated to form an NMI distribution for each electrode. The total NMI for each electrode (the summation of the electrode’s NMI distribution) highlighted regions of high dependence in the electrode array and was observed to increase as the muscle fatigued. To summarise this increase, a function, M(k), was defined and was found to be significantly affected by fatigue and not by contraction force. The technique discussed in this study has overcome issues regarding electrode placement and was used to investigate how the dependences between sEMG signals within the same muscle change spatially during fatigue. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Information Theory Applied to Physiological Signals)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Electrode arrangement and position.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>An example of the Normalised Mutual Information (NMI) between the electrode positioned at row 9 column 3 and every other electrode showing the first (non-fatigued) and last (fatigued) time segments for 40% Maximum Voluntary Contraction (MVC) in plot (<b>a</b>) and 80% MVC in plot (<b>b</b>). Blue bars represent the NMI during the non-fatigued state and yellow bars represent the NMI during the fatigued state.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Eample Magnitude Maps of <math display="inline"> <semantics> <msub> <mi mathvariant="bold">D</mi> <mi mathvariant="bold">norm</mi> </msub> </semantics> </math> for one subject.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Average <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mi>M</mi> <mo>(</mo> <mi>k</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </semantics> </math> for all participants.</p>
Full article ">
2674 KiB  
Article
Entropy and Compression Capture Different Complexity Features: The Case of Fetal Heart Rate
by João Monteiro-Santos, Hernâni Gonçalves, João Bernardes, Luís Antunes, Mohammad Nozari and Cristina Costa-Santos
Entropy 2017, 19(12), 688; https://doi.org/10.3390/e19120688 - 14 Dec 2017
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 4534
Abstract
Entropy and compression have been used to distinguish fetuses at risk of hypoxia from their healthy counterparts through the analysis of Fetal Heart Rate (FHR). Low correlation that was observed between these two approaches suggests that they capture different complexity features. This study [...] Read more.
Entropy and compression have been used to distinguish fetuses at risk of hypoxia from their healthy counterparts through the analysis of Fetal Heart Rate (FHR). Low correlation that was observed between these two approaches suggests that they capture different complexity features. This study aims at characterizing the complexity of FHR features captured by entropy and compression, using as reference international guidelines. Single and multi-scale approaches were considered in the computation of entropy and compression. The following physiologic-based features were considered: FHR baseline; percentage of abnormal long (%abLTV) and short (%abSTV) term variability; average short term variability; and, number of acceleration and decelerations. All of the features were computed on a set of 68 intrapartum FHR tracings, divided as normal, mildly, and moderately-severely acidemic born fetuses. The correlation between entropy/compression features and the physiologic-based features was assessed. There were correlations between compressions and accelerations and decelerations, but neither accelerations nor decelerations were significantly correlated with entropies. The %abSTV was significantly correlated with entropies (ranging between ?0.54 and ?0.62), and to a higher extent with compression (ranging between ?0.80 and ?0.94). Distinction between groups was clearer in the lower scales using entropy and in the higher scales using compression. Entropy and compression are complementary complexity measures. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Information Theory Applied to Physiological Signals)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Multiscale analysis of tracings using Approximate entropy (ApEn) with tolerance 0.2. Plotted 95% Confidence Intervals of the mean for each group in each scale. (MA: mildly acidemic fetuses; MSA: moderate-to-severe acidemic fetuses; N: the normal range).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Multiscale analysis of tracings using Sample entropy (SampEn) with tolerance 0.2. Plotted 95% Confidence Intervals of the mean for each group in each scale.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Multiscale analysis of tracings using compressor Brotli with maximum level of compression. Plotted 95% Confidence Intervals of the mean for each group in each scale.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Multiscale analysis of tracings using compressor Gzip with maximum level of compression. Plotted 95% Confidence Intervals of the mean for each group in each scale.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Multiscale analysis of tracings using compressor Paq8l with maximum level of compression. Plotted 95% Confidence Intervals of the mean for each group in each scale.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Multiscale analysis of tracings using compressor Bzip2 with maximum level of compression. Plotted 95% Confidence Intervals of the mean for each group in each scale.</p>
Full article ">
848 KiB  
Article
Altered Brain Complexity in Women with Primary Dysmenorrhea: A Resting-State Magneto-Encephalography Study Using Multiscale Entropy Analysis
by Intan Low, Po-Chih Kuo, Yu-Hsiang Liu, Cheng-Lin Tsai, Hsiang-Tai Chao, Jen-Chuen Hsieh, Li-Fen Chen and Yong-Sheng Chen
Entropy 2017, 19(12), 680; https://doi.org/10.3390/e19120680 - 11 Dec 2017
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 6501
Abstract
How chronic pain affects brain functions remains unclear. As a potential indicator, brain complexity estimated by entropy-based methods may be helpful for revealing the underlying neurophysiological mechanism of chronic pain. In this study, complexity features with multiple time scales and spectral features were [...] Read more.
How chronic pain affects brain functions remains unclear. As a potential indicator, brain complexity estimated by entropy-based methods may be helpful for revealing the underlying neurophysiological mechanism of chronic pain. In this study, complexity features with multiple time scales and spectral features were extracted from resting-state magnetoencephalographic signals of 156 female participants with/without primary dysmenorrhea (PDM) during pain-free state. Revealed by multiscale sample entropy (MSE), PDM patients (PDMs) exhibited loss of brain complexity in regions associated with sensory, affective, and evaluative components of pain, including sensorimotor, limbic, and salience networks. Significant correlations between MSE values and psychological states (depression and anxiety) were found in PDMs, which may indicate specific nonlinear disturbances in limbic and default mode network circuits after long-term menstrual pain. These findings suggest that MSE is an important measure of brain complexity and is potentially applicable to future diagnosis of chronic pain. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Information Theory Applied to Physiological Signals)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Examples of time series data for an 8-s epoch over a range of representative scale factors (<span class="html-italic">τ</span>) from fine to coarse scales: 1, 5, 30, 60 and 90. The <span class="html-italic">x</span>-axis represents time and the <span class="html-italic">y</span>-axis represents the estimated brain activity index.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Significant multiscale sample entropy (MSE) group differences from resting-state MEG brain signals during pain-free state. MSE values of PDMs were mostly lower than those of CONs. Significant MSE group differences were found at larger scale factors (SFs) and mainly in the right hemisphere. (<b>a</b>) Histogram of the number of regions showing significant group differences (permutation testing with 5000 iterations, <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, two-tailed) from SFs 1 to 10: SFs 1~50 (0), 51~60 (4), 61–70 (8), 71~80 (6), 81~90 (10), and 91~100 (14). Top three: SF 92 (count = 4), SF 81 (count = 3), and SF 99 (count = 3); (<b>b</b>) MSE group differences. The <span class="html-italic">x</span>-axis represents the SFs of MSE ranging from 51 to 100. The <span class="html-italic">y</span>-axis represents the AAL brain regions, which were categorized into different RSNs (indicated by thick lines and text in different colors) for functional attribution. The color bar represents between-group <span class="html-italic">t</span>-values after 5000 permutation tests, with the most positive <span class="html-italic">t</span>-values (PDMs &gt; CONs) shown in bright yellow and the most negative <span class="html-italic">t</span>-values (PDMs &lt; CONs) shown in bright blue; (<b>c</b>) Brain regions that revealed significant MSE group differences were grouped into five SF-intervals for demonstration: SFs 51~60, 61–70, 71~80, 81~90 and 91~100. Brain regions where MSE measures in PDMs were higher or lower than those in CONs are represented in red or blue spheres, respectively. Size of sphere represents the count of scale factors that showed significant group differences. PDM, primary dysmenorrhea patients; CON, healthy female controls; L, left hemisphere; R, right hemisphere; LIMBIC, limbic network; DMN, default mode network; SAN, salience network; SMN, sensorimotor network; ECN, executive control network; AMYG, amygdala; ANG, angular gyrus; ITG, inferior temporal gyrus; CAL, calcarine; ROL, rolandic operculum; IPL, inferior parietal lobule; LING, lingual gyrus; IFGoperc, opercularis of inferior frontal gyrus; SOG, superior occipital gyrus; CUN, cuneus; PHG, parahippocampal gyrus; FFG, fusiform gyrus; MTG, middle temporal gyrus; MOG, middle occipital gyrus; ACG, anterior cingulate gyrus; THA, thalamus; HIP, hippocampus; PCUN, precuenus.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Hemispheric asymmetry of multiscale sample entropy (asymMSE) group differences from resting-state MEG brain signals during pain-free state. Significant group differences were found across all scale factor-intervals with the most differences seen between SFs 31~60. (<b>a</b>) Count of each SF that showed significant group differences (permutation testing with 5000 iterations, <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01, two-tailed); (<b>b</b>) Group differences in hemispheric asymmetry of MSE (asymMSE). The <span class="html-italic">x</span>-axis represents the scale factors (SFs) of asymMSE ranging from 1 to 100; the <span class="html-italic">y</span>-axis represents the AAL brain regions which were categorized into different RSNs (indicated by thick lines and text in different colors) for functional attribution; the color bar represents between-group <span class="html-italic">t</span>-values after 5000 permutation tests (<span class="html-italic">α</span> = 0.01) as listed in <a href="#app1-entropy-19-00680" class="html-app">Table S2</a>, with the most positive <span class="html-italic">t</span>-values (PDMs &gt; CONs) shown in bright yellow and the most negative <span class="html-italic">t</span>-values (PDMs &lt; CONs) shown in bright blue; (<b>c</b>) Altered hemispheric asymmetry of MSE in PDMs. Brain regions that revealed significant asymMSE group differences were grouped into six SF-intervals for demonstration (<a href="#app1-entropy-19-00680" class="html-app">Table S2</a>): SFs 1~30, 31~40, 41~50, 51~60, 61–80 and 81~100. CON group exhibited mostly left-lateralization. Compared to CONs, grey, red, and blue spheres indicate the brain regions with loss of hemispheric asymmetry, right-lateralization, and left-lateralization in PDMs, respectively. Size of sphere represents count of scale factors that showed significant group differences. PDM, primary dysmenorrhea patients; CON, healthy female controls; LIMBIC, limbic network; DMN, default mode network; SAN, salience network; SMN, sensorimotor network; ECN, executive control network; L, left hemisphere; R, right hemisphere; MFG, middle frontal gyrus; ORBmid, orbital MFG; ROL, rolandic operculum; PUT, putamen; HES, Heschl gyrus; SFG, superior frontal gyrus; ORBsupmed, medial orbital SFG; SFGmed, medial SFG; ACG, anterior cingulate gyrus; CAU, caudate; IFGoperc, opercularis of inferior frontal gyrus; AMYG, amygdala; PHG, parahippocampal g.; SFGdor, dorsolateral SFG; HIP, hippocampus; THA, thalamus.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Group differences of hemispheric asymmetry of spectral and other complexity features from resting-state MEG brain signals during pain-free state. Significant group differences were only disclosed in hemispheric asymmetry of high gamma relative band power, median frequency, and spectral edge frequency, and were left-lateralized mainly in the frontal regions in PDMs. (<b>a</b>) Group differences in hemispheric asymmetry. The <span class="html-italic">x</span>-axis of the matrix represents the hemispheric asymmetry of spectral and other brain complexity features; the <span class="html-italic">y</span>-axis represents the AAL brain regions which were categorized into different RSNs (indicated by thick lines and text in different colors) for functional attribution; the color bar represents between-group <span class="html-italic">t</span>-values after 5000 permutation tests (<span class="html-italic">α</span> = 0.01), with the most positive <span class="html-italic">t</span>-values (PDMs &gt; CONs) shown in bright yellow and the most negative <span class="html-italic">t</span>-values (PDMs &lt; CONs) shown in bright blue; (<b>b</b>) Hemispheric asymmetry alterations in PDMs were displayed (<a href="#app1-entropy-19-00680" class="html-app">Table S4</a>). Blue spheres depict the brain regions with enhanced left lateralization in PDMs compared to CONs. PDM, primary dysmenorrhea patients; CON, healthy female controls; L, left hemisphere; R, right hemisphere; g., gyrus; IFG, inferior frontal gyrus; MFG, middle frontal gyrus; ORBmid, orbital MFG; ORBinf, orbital IFG, orbital; LING, lingual gyrus; RP, relative band power; <span class="html-italic">δ</span>, <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mi>RP</mi> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi>δ</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </semantics> </math>; <span class="html-italic">θ</span>, <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mi>RP</mi> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi>θ</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> <mo>;</mo> </mrow> </semantics> </math> <span class="html-italic">α</span>, <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mi>RP</mi> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi>α</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> <mo>;</mo> </mrow> </semantics> </math> <span class="html-italic">β</span>, <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mi>RP</mi> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi>β</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> <mo>;</mo> </mrow> </semantics> </math> L<span class="html-italic">γ</span>, <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mi>RP</mi> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mrow> <mi>l</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>w</mi> <mo> </mo> <mi>γ</mi> </mrow> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> <mo>;</mo> </mrow> </semantics> </math> H<span class="html-italic">γ</span>, <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mi>RP</mi> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mrow> <mi>h</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>g</mi> <mi>h</mi> <mo> </mo> <mi>γ</mi> </mrow> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> <mo>;</mo> </mrow> </semantics> </math> MF, median frequency; SEF, Spectral edge frequency; SSE, Shannon sample entropy; LZC, Lempel-Ziv complexity.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Spearman correlation between multiscale sample entropy and pain experiences or psychological characteristics in primary dysmenorrhea patients (PDMs). The <span class="html-italic">x</span>-axis of each subfigure is the value of MSE or hemispheric asymmetry of MSE (asymMSE) in each PDMs; the <span class="html-italic">y</span>-axis is the pain and/or psychological scores. Spearman <span class="html-italic">rho</span> and <span class="html-italic">p</span>-values are listed for each correlation. (<b>a</b>) Brain complexity in the right hippocampus positively correlated with depression score; (<b>b</b>) Brain complexity in the left thalamus positively correlated with depression scores; (<b>c</b>) Brain complexity in the left Rolandic operculum negatively correlated with physical component score of quality of life; (<b>d</b>) Asymmetry of brain complexity in the parahippocampal gyrus was positively correlated with anxiety score. MSE, multiscale sample entropy; asymMSE, hemispheric asymmetry of MSE; BDI, Beck depression inventory; BAI, Beck anxiety inventory; PCS, pain catastrophizing scale; MPQ, McGill pain questionnaire; PRI, MPQ pain rating index; PPI, MPQ present pain index.</p>
Full article ">
4601 KiB  
Article
Automated Detection of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Using an Information-Based Similarity Approach
by Xingran Cui, Emily Chang, Wen-Hung Yang, Bernard C. Jiang, Albert C. Yang and Chung-Kang Peng
Entropy 2017, 19(12), 677; https://doi.org/10.3390/e19120677 - 10 Dec 2017
Cited by 27 | Viewed by 6025
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an abnormal rhythm of the heart, which can increase heart-related complications. Paroxysmal AF episodes occur intermittently with varying duration. Human-based diagnosis of paroxysmal AF with a longer-term electrocardiogram recording is time-consuming. Here we present a fully automated ensemble model [...] Read more.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an abnormal rhythm of the heart, which can increase heart-related complications. Paroxysmal AF episodes occur intermittently with varying duration. Human-based diagnosis of paroxysmal AF with a longer-term electrocardiogram recording is time-consuming. Here we present a fully automated ensemble model for AF episode detection based on RR-interval time series, applying a novel approach of information-based similarity analysis and ensemble scheme. By mapping RR-interval time series to binary symbolic sequences and comparing the rank-frequency patterns of m-bit words, the dissimilarity between AF and normal sinus rhythms (NSR) were quantified. To achieve high detection specificity and sensitivity, and low variance, a weighted variation of bagging with multiple AF and NSR templates was applied. By performing dissimilarity comparisons between unknown RR-interval time series and multiple templates, paroxysmal AF episodes were detected. Based on our results, optimal AF detection parameters are symbolic word length m = 9 and observation window n = 150, achieving 97.04% sensitivity, 97.96% specificity, and 97.78% overall accuracy. Sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy vary little despite changes in m and n parameters. This study provides quantitative information to enhance the categorization of AF and normal cardiac rhythms. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Information Theory Applied to Physiological Signals)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Representative inter-beat (RR) interval time series derived from an electrocardiographic recording of a patient with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. The dark circles represent consecutive RR intervals and the solid line indicates the presence/absence of AF episodes as reported in the annotations of PhysioNet database. During an episode of atrial fibrillation, the line is set to “AF”; otherwise it is set to “Non-AF”, which means a rhythm that is not atrial fibrillation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Schematic illustration of the mapping procedure for 6-bit words (<span class="html-italic">m</span> = 6).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Representative inter-beat time series for a healthy subject (<b>a</b>) and an AF patient (<b>b</b>); (<b>c</b>) Rank order comparison of the time series for two healthy subjects; (<b>d</b>) Rank order comparison of the time series for two AF patients; (<b>e</b>) Rank order comparison of the time series in (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>). The results in (<b>c</b>–<b>e</b>) are for the case <span class="html-italic">m</span> = 6.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) Graphic illustration of detection results for a testing data (record 04908, <span class="html-italic">m</span> = 9, observation window <span class="html-italic">n</span> = 150, Δ = 0.1); (<b>b</b>) enlarged AF segment derived from (<b>a</b>); (<b>c</b>) Enlarged signal segment of neither AF nor normal beats to compare with (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Graphic illustration of detection results for a testing data (record 04043, <span class="html-italic">m</span> = 9, <span class="html-italic">n</span> = 150, Δ = 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Computation time according to m and n (the computation times are the average values of 100 trials).</p>
Full article ">
3539 KiB  
Article
Association between Multiscale Entropy Characteristics of Heart Rate Variability and Ischemic Stroke Risk in Patients with Permanent Atrial Fibrillation
by Ryo Matsuoka, Kohzoh Yoshino, Eiichi Watanabe and Ken Kiyono
Entropy 2017, 19(12), 672; https://doi.org/10.3390/e19120672 - 7 Dec 2017
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 4947
Abstract
Multiscale entropy (MSE) profiles of heart rate variability (HRV) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AFib) provides clinically useful information for ischemic stroke risk assessment, suggesting that the complex properties characterized by MSE profiles are associated with ischemic stroke risk. However, the meaning of [...] Read more.
Multiscale entropy (MSE) profiles of heart rate variability (HRV) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AFib) provides clinically useful information for ischemic stroke risk assessment, suggesting that the complex properties characterized by MSE profiles are associated with ischemic stroke risk. However, the meaning of HRV complexity in patients with AFib has not been clearly interpreted, and the physical and mathematical understanding of the relation between HRV dynamics and the ischemic stroke risk is not well established. To gain a deeper insight into HRV dynamics in patients with AFib, and to improve ischemic stroke risk assessment using HRV analysis, we study the HRV characteristics related to MSE profiles, such as the long-range correlation and probability density function. In this study, we analyze the HRV time series of 173 patients with permanent AFib. Our results show that, although HRV time series in patients with AFib exhibit long-range correlation (1/f fluctuations)—as observed in healthy subjects—in a range longer than 90 s, these autocorrelation properties have no significant predictive power for ischemic stroke occurrence. Further, the probability density function structure of the coarse-grained times series at scales greater than 2 s is dominantly associated with ischemic stroke risk. This observation could provide valuable information for improving ischemic stroke risk assessment using HRV analysis. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Information Theory Applied to Physiological Signals)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>RR interval {<math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>x</mi> <mi>i</mi> </msub> </mrow> </semantics> </math>} and coarse-grained time series {<math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mi>y</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mrow> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi>s</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics> </math>} when <span class="html-italic">s</span> = 240 s. The left panels (<b>a</b>) show a patient who did not develop ischemic strokes during the observation period, and the right panels (<b>b</b>) show a patient who did. The coarse-grained time series is rescaled by subtracting its mean <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <msup> <mi>μ</mi> <mrow> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi>s</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </msup> </mrow> </semantics> </math> and dividing the differences by the standard deviation <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>σ</mi> <mi>x</mi> </msub> </mrow> </semantics> </math> of the resampled RR intervals.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Comparison between the groups that developed ischemic strokes (blue triangles) and did not develop ischemic strokes (red circles) during the observation period: (<b>a</b>) Multiscale entropy (MSE) profiles of <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mi>S</mi> <mi>E</mi> <mrow> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi>s</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics> </math>; and (<b>b</b>) fluctuation functions <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mi>F</mi> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi>s</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </semantics> </math> estimated by detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA). Dashed lines indicate slopes with <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mi>α</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.5</mn> </mrow> </semantics> </math> and <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mi>α</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1.0</mn> </mrow> </semantics> </math>. The unit of <span class="html-italic">s</span> is seconds in both panels. Error bars indicate the standard deviation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Comparison between the groups that developed (blue triangles) and did not develop (red circles) ischemic strokes during the observation period: (<b>a</b>) autocorrelation coefficient at lag 1; (<b>b</b>) variance ratio; and (<b>c</b>) distribution-based entropy. The unit of <span class="html-italic">s</span> is seconds in all panels. Error bars indicate the standard deviation. No significant differences between the two groups were observed in the autocorrelation coefficient at lag 1 and the variance ratio.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for the prediction of ischemic stroke occurrence during the observation period. The blue lines represent the ROC curve using the sample entropy <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mi>S</mi> <mi>E</mi> <mrow> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi>s</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics> </math> when <span class="html-italic">s</span> = 240 s and the red lines represent the ROC curve using the distribution-based entropy <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mi>H</mi> <mi>D</mi> <mrow> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi>s</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics> </math> when <span class="html-italic">s</span> = 2 s. The AUCs were 0.65 and 0.68, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Illustrative examples of the estimated probability density functions of coarse-grained time series {<math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mi>y</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mrow> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi>s</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics> </math>} at: (<b>a</b>) <span class="html-italic">s</span> = 2 s; and (<b>b</b>) <span class="html-italic">s</span> = 240 s. The coarse-grained time series is rescaled by the standard deviation <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>σ</mi> <mi>x</mi> </msub> </mrow> </semantics> </math> of the resampled RR intervals. Red bar charts represent a patient who did not develop ischemic strokes during the observation period, and blue bar charts represent a patient who did develop ischemic strokes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) Comparison of sample entropy <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mi>S</mi> <mi>E</mi> <mrow> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi>s</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics> </math> between the original and randomly shuffled RR intervals. (<b>b</b>) Comparison of distribution-based entropy <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mi>H</mi> <mi>D</mi> <mrow> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi>s</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics> </math> between the original and randomly shuffled RR intervals. Blue triangles represent patients who developed ischemic strokes and red circles represent patients who did not develop ischemic stroke. The unit of <span class="html-italic">s</span> is seconds. (<b>c</b>) The scale dependence of <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mi>H</mi> <mi>D</mi> <mrow> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi>s</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics> </math> for Gaussian processes characterized by DFA scaling exponent <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mi>α</mi> </semantics> </math>. <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mi>H</mi> <mi>D</mi> <mrow> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi>s</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </msubsup> </mrow> </semantics> </math> was estimated from the numerically generated time series. The unit of <span class="html-italic">n</span> is the number of data points.</p>
Full article ">
2152 KiB  
Article
Assessment of Heart Rate Variability during an Endurance Mountain Trail Race by Multi-Scale Entropy Analysis
by Montserrat Vallverdú, Aroa Ruiz-Muñoz, Emma Roca, Pere Caminal, Ferran A. Rodríguez, Alfredo Irurtia and Alexandre Perera
Entropy 2017, 19(12), 658; https://doi.org/10.3390/e19120658 - 1 Dec 2017
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 6042
Abstract
The aim of the study was to analyze heart rate variability (HRV) response to high-intensity exercise during a 35-km mountain trail race and to ascertain whether fitness level could influence autonomic nervous system (ANS) modulation. Time-domain, frequency-domain, and multi-scale entropy (MSE) [...] Read more.
The aim of the study was to analyze heart rate variability (HRV) response to high-intensity exercise during a 35-km mountain trail race and to ascertain whether fitness level could influence autonomic nervous system (ANS) modulation. Time-domain, frequency-domain, and multi-scale entropy (MSE) indexes were calculated for eleven mountain-trail runners who completed the race. Many changes were observed, mostly related to exercise load and fatigue. These changes were characterized by increased mean values and standard deviations of the normal-to-normal intervals associated with sympathetic activity, and by decreased differences between successive intervals related to parasympathetic activity. Normalized low frequency (LF) power suggested that ANS modulation varied greatly during the race and between individuals. Normalized high frequency (HF) power, associated with parasympathetic activity, varied considerably over the race, and tended to decrease at the final stages, whereas changes in the LF/HF ratio corresponded to intervals with varying exercise load. MSE indexes, related to system complexity, indicated the existence of many interactions between the heart and its neurological control mechanism. The time-domain, frequency-domain, and MSE indexes were also able to discriminate faster from slower runners, mainly in the more difficult and in the final stages of the race. These findings suggest the use of HRV analysis to study cardiac function mechanisms in endurance sports. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Information Theory Applied to Physiological Signals)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Elevation profile of the route. The 36 segments of 5-min duration selected from the fastest runner are displayed.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Time series of selected performance variables in different segments of the race for the fastest runner: (<b>a</b>) <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mi>T</mi> <mi>S</mi> </mrow> </semantics> </math>, terrain slope; (<b>b</b>), <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mi>E</mi> <mi>L</mi> </mrow> </semantics> </math>, exercise load; (<b>c</b>) <span class="html-italic">FI</span>, fatigue interval; and (<b>d</b>) <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mi>R</mi> <mi>S</mi> </mrow> </semantics> </math>, running speed.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Boxplots of <span class="html-italic">meanNN</span> index (<b>a</b>); <span class="html-italic">sdNN</span> index (<b>b</b>) and <span class="html-italic">LF</span>/<span class="html-italic">HF</span> ratio (<b>c</b>) for the 36 RR-segments analysed over the course considering the whole group of runners. Those segments showing inter-segment statistical differences (<span class="html-italic">p</span>-value &lt; 0.05) are marked with *.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Cross-tabulated <span class="html-italic">p</span>-values chart (as-log<sub>10</sub>(<span class="html-italic">p</span>-values)) comparing the <span class="html-italic">meanNN</span> indexes from all RR-segments of the race. Cells containing significant <span class="html-italic">p</span>-values are coloured dark red (<span class="html-italic">p</span>-value &lt; 0.005), medium red (0.005 ≤ <span class="html-italic">p</span>-value &lt; 0.01), or light red (0.01 ≤ <span class="html-italic">p</span>-value ≤ 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Changes in the <span class="html-italic">SampEn</span> values during the race for the whole group of runners: (<b>a</b>) Mean value and standard error of <span class="html-italic">MSE</span> indexes as a function of the scale <span class="html-italic">τ</span> derived from the thirty-six RR-segments during the entire race; (<b>b</b>) Number of <span class="html-italic">MSE</span> indexes which significant differed among the thirty-six RR-segments.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Boxplots of <span class="html-italic">SampEn</span> for the 36 RR-segments analysed over the course considering all the runners at scales <span class="html-italic">τ</span> = 1 (<b>a</b>), <span class="html-italic">τ</span> = 6 (<b>b</b>) and <span class="html-italic">τ</span> = 14 (<b>c</b>). Segments showing inter-segmental statistical differences (<span class="html-italic">p</span>-value &lt; 0.05) are marked with *.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6 Cont.
<p>Boxplots of <span class="html-italic">SampEn</span> for the 36 RR-segments analysed over the course considering all the runners at scales <span class="html-italic">τ</span> = 1 (<b>a</b>), <span class="html-italic">τ</span> = 6 (<b>b</b>) and <span class="html-italic">τ</span> = 14 (<b>c</b>). Segments showing inter-segmental statistical differences (<span class="html-italic">p</span>-value &lt; 0.05) are marked with *.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p><span class="html-italic">MSE</span> values and their averaged values (dashed line) at each <span class="html-italic">τ</span> for the two groups of runners in a specific segment: s9 in (<b>a</b>); s17 in (<b>b</b>); s25 in (<b>c</b>); s31 in (<b>d</b>). Grey circles correspond to the faster group of runners (FR) while black circles correspond to the slower group of runners (SR).</p>
Full article ">
2018 KiB  
Article
Cosine Similarity Entropy: Self-Correlation-Based Complexity Analysis of Dynamical Systems
by Theerasak Chanwimalueang and Danilo P. Mandic
Entropy 2017, 19(12), 652; https://doi.org/10.3390/e19120652 - 30 Nov 2017
Cited by 40 | Viewed by 9679
Abstract
The nonparametric Sample Entropy (SE) estimator has become a standard for the quantification of structural complexity of nonstationary time series, even in critical cases of unfavorable noise levels. The SE has proven very successful for signals that exhibit a certain degree of the [...] Read more.
The nonparametric Sample Entropy (SE) estimator has become a standard for the quantification of structural complexity of nonstationary time series, even in critical cases of unfavorable noise levels. The SE has proven very successful for signals that exhibit a certain degree of the underlying structure, but do not obey standard probability distributions, a typical case in real-world scenarios such as with physiological signals. However, the SE estimates structural complexity based on uncertainty rather than on (self) correlation, so that, for reliable estimation, the SE requires long data segments, is sensitive to spikes and erratic peaks in data, and owing to its amplitude dependence it exhibits lack of precision for signals with long-term correlations. To this end, we propose a class of new entropy estimators based on the similarity of embedding vectors, evaluated through the angular distance, the Shannon entropy and the coarse-grained scale. Analysis of the effects of embedding dimension, sample size and tolerance shows that the so introduced Cosine Similarity Entropy (CSE) and the enhanced Multiscale Cosine Similarity Entropy (MCSE) are amplitude-independent and therefore superior to the SE when applied to short time series. Unlike the SE, the CSE is shown to yield valid entropy values over a broad range of embedding dimensions. By evaluating the CSE and the MCSE over a variety of benchmark synthetic signals as well as for real-world data (heart rate variability of three different cardiovascular pathologies), the proposed algorithms are demonstrated to be able to quantify degrees of structural complexity in the context of self-correlation over small to large temporal scales, thus offering physically meaningful interpretations and rigor in the understanding the intrinsic properties of the structural complexity of a system, such as the number of its degrees of freedom. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Information Theory Applied to Physiological Signals)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Geometric interpretation of the Chebyshev and angular distances in Cartesian coordinates. (<b>a</b>) Chebyshev distance of two embedding vectors <math display="inline"> <semantics> <msubsup> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mi> <mn>1</mn> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>m</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </msubsup> </semantics> </math> and <math display="inline"> <semantics> <msubsup> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mi> <mn>2</mn> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>m</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </msubsup> </semantics> </math>, with embedding dimensions <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mi>m</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </semantics> </math> and <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mi>m</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </semantics> </math>. The Chebyshev distance represents the coordinate-wise maximum amplitude difference of the two embedding vectors; (<b>b</b>) the angular distance of embedding vectors <math display="inline"> <semantics> <msubsup> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mi> <mn>1</mn> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>m</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </msubsup> </semantics> </math> and <math display="inline"> <semantics> <msubsup> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mi> <mn>2</mn> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>m</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </msubsup> </semantics> </math> with <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mi>m</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </semantics> </math> and <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mi>m</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </semantics> </math>; the angles <math display="inline"> <semantics> <msubsup> <mi>α</mi> <mrow> <mn>1</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>m</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </msubsup> </semantics> </math> and the angular distance between the two embedding vectors are calculated using Equations (6) and (7).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Geometric interpretation of similar patterns in three-dimensional phase space reconstruction. The embedding vector, <math display="inline"> <semantics> <msup> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mi> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mn>3</mn> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </msup> </semantics> </math> is reconstructed from an Electrocardiogram (ECG) time series using <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mi>m</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </semantics> </math> and <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mi>τ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </semantics> </math>. (<b>a</b>) normalized raw ECG time series; (<b>b</b>) Chebyshev distance; similar patterns are located inside the red sphere spanned by the radius (tolerance), <math display="inline"> <semantics> <msub> <mi>r</mi> <mrow> <mi>S</mi> <mi>E</mi> </mrow> </msub> </semantics> </math>, from a particular embedding vector <math display="inline"> <semantics> <msubsup> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mi> <mrow> <mi>i</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mn>3</mn> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </msubsup> </semantics> </math> located at the center; (<b>c</b>) angular distance; similar patterns are captured inside the cone beam projected from the origin to a particular embedding vector <math display="inline"> <semantics> <msubsup> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mi> <mrow> <mi>i</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mn>3</mn> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </msubsup> </semantics> </math>, where the angle of the cone beam is equal to the angular distance (tolerance), <math display="inline"> <semantics> <msub> <mi>r</mi> <mrow> <mi>C</mi> <mi>S</mi> <mi>E</mi> </mrow> </msub> </semantics> </math>. Observe that the area of the similarity derived from the angular distance method is independent of amplitude levels, unlike the Chebyshev distance method. This means that the angular distance can detect similar structural patterns even though the amplitudes of the elements of a particular embedding vector are scaled.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Selection of the tolerance parameter for the Cosine Similarity Entropy (CSE) algorithm. (<b>a</b>) standard Shannon entropy curve as a function of the probability of a selected event (<math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mi>P</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>X</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </semantics> </math>) when using 1-bit data; (<b>b</b>) Four CSE curves for White Gaussian Noise (WGN), <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mn>1</mn> <mo>/</mo> <mi>f</mi> </mrow> </semantics> </math> noise, autoregressive processes AR(1) and AR(2), when varying <math display="inline"> <semantics> <msub> <mi>r</mi> <mrow> <mi>C</mi> <mi>S</mi> <mi>E</mi> </mrow> </msub> </semantics> </math> from 0.01 to 0.99.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Comparison of the entropy curves over a varying embedding dimension, <span class="html-italic">m</span>, using the Sample Entropy (SE), the fuzzy entropy (FE) and CSE approaches. The 30 independent realizations with 1000 samples were generated for each of the four synthetic signals; WGN, <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mn>1</mn> <mo>/</mo> <mi>f</mi> </mrow> </semantics> </math> noise, AR(1) and AR(2). The mean entropies with their standard deviations are plotted against the embedding dimension. (<b>a</b>) results of the SE; (<b>b</b>) results of the FE; and (<b>c</b>) results of the CSE.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Comparison of the entropy curves over varying sample sizes using the SE, FE and CSE approaches. The 30 independent realizations, with sample sizes ranging from 10 to 5000 samples, were generated for each of the four synthetic signals; WGN, <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mn>1</mn> <mo>/</mo> <mi>f</mi> </mrow> </semantics> </math> noise, AR(1) and AR(2). The mean entropies with their standard deviations are plotted against data length <span class="html-italic">N</span>. (<b>a</b>) results of the SE; (<b>b</b>) results of the FE; (<b>c</b>) results of the CSE. Observe that, at the sample size of 1000, the CSE yielded the smallest SD of mean entropies of all synthetic signals (see <a href="#entropy-19-00652-t001" class="html-table">Table 1</a>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Comparison of the complexity profiles of the four synthetic signals, WGN, <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mn>1</mn> <mo>/</mo> <mi>f</mi> </mrow> </semantics> </math> noise, AR(1) and AR(2), using the Multiscale Sample Entropy (MSE), the multiscale fuzzy entropy (MFE) and Multiscale Cosine Similarity Entropy (MCSE) approaches. The 20 independent realizations with 10,000 samples were generated for each of the four synthetic signals. The mean entropies with their standard deviations are plotted against the coarse-grained scales. (<b>a</b>) results of the MSE; (<b>b</b>) results of the MFE; (<b>c</b>) results of the MCSE. Observe that the MCSE produces very consistent and correct behaviors in terms of the degrees of structural complexity, especially for large scales where the <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mn>1</mn> <mo>/</mo> <mi>f</mi> </mrow> </semantics> </math> noise exhibits correctly the highest complexity (long-term correlation), unlike the MSE and MFE in plots (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Comparison of the complexity profiles of AR(1) processes with a varying (correlation) coefficient <math display="inline"> <semantics> <msub> <mi>α</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </semantics> </math>, using the MSE, MFE and MCSE approaches. The 20 independent realizations with 10,000 samples of WGN were generated as a driving noise for each of the nine AR(1) with a varying correlation coefficient <math display="inline"> <semantics> <msub> <mi>α</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </semantics> </math> (<math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>α</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">[</mo> <mn>0.1</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>0.2</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mo>…</mo> <mo>,</mo> <mn>0.8</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>0.9</mn> <mo stretchy="false">]</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </semantics> </math> (see more detail in <a href="#app1-entropy-19-00652" class="html-app">Appendix A</a>). The mean entropies with their standard deviations are plotted against the coarse-grained scales. (<b>a</b>) results of the MSE; (<b>b</b>) results of the MFE; (<b>c</b>) results of the MCSE. Observe that the complexity order of all AR(1) processes estimated from the MCSE is consistent over all scale factors, while the MSE and MFE produced different and inconsistent complexity values ordered from small to large AR(1) coefficients. The AR(1) processes exhibit a single degree of freedom in their structural complexity, and only the proposed MCSE was able to reveal physical insight.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Comparison of the complexity profiles of AR(<span class="html-italic">p</span>) processes, where <span class="html-italic">p</span> is the AR order ranging from 1 to 9, using the MSE, MFE and MCSE approaches. The 20 independent realizations with 10,000 samples of WGN were generated as a driving noise for each of the nine AR(<span class="html-italic">p</span>) processes with pre-defined correlation coefficients (for details see <a href="#app1-entropy-19-00652" class="html-app">Appendix A</a>). The mean entropies with their standard deviations are plotted against the coarse-grained scales. (<b>a</b>) results of the MSE; (<b>b</b>) results of the MFE and (<b>c</b>) results of the MCSE. Observe the complexity order of all AR(1) processes estimated from the MCSE is consistent over all scale factors, while the MSE and MFE produce mixed complexity order from small (<math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mi>ϵ</mi> <mo>&gt;</mo> <mn>4</mn> </mrow> </semantics> </math>) to large scale factors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Comparison of the complexity profiles of heart rate variability using the MSE, MFE and MCSE approaches. Three conditions of heart rate variability were considered: (i) normal sinus rhythm; (ii) congestive heart failure and (iii) atrial fibrillation, which were obtained from the Physionet database (for more details, see <a href="#app2-entropy-19-00652" class="html-app">Appendix B</a>). Mean entropies and their standard errors are plotted against the coarse-grained scales. (<b>a</b>) results of the MSE; (<b>b</b>) results of the MFE; (<b>c</b>) results of the MCSE. Notice that the MCSE yields highest long-term correlation for the Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) and lower degrees of long-term correlation for the Normal Sinus Rhythm (NSR) and Atrial Fibrillation (AF). These correct highest degrees of correlation (fewer random components) can also be observed from the raw signals of the CHF as shown in <a href="#entropy-19-00652-f0A2" class="html-fig">Figure A2</a>, while the lowest degrees of correlation (more random components) can be observed from the raw signals of the AF.</p>
Full article ">Figure A1
<p>Two groups of synthetic AR processes used for evaluating the performances of the SE, FE and CSE approaches. (<b>a</b>) the first 300 samples from AR(1) processes with nine varying coefficients of correlation (<math display="inline"> <semantics> <msub> <mi>α</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </semantics> </math>) and the driving WGN input; (<b>b</b>) the first 300 samples of the AR(1)–AR(9) processes with the pre-defined correlation coefficients and the driving WGN input, giving signals with the degrees of freedom of the underlying generation system ranging from 1 to 9.</p>
Full article ">Figure A2
<p>Example of the RR intervals (RRI) of the three cardiac conditions over 225 s duration. Top: RRI of the normal sinus rhythm database (in blue); Middle: RRI of the congestive heart failure database (in red); Bottom: graph represents the atrial fibrillation (in black). Observe the highest degrees of correlation (fewer random components) can be observed from the RRI of the CHF, while the lowest degrees of correlation (more random components) can be observed from the RRI of the AF.</p>
Full article ">Figure A3
<p>Computational time for the SE, FE and CSE algorithms. The 10 independent realizations of 40 incremental sample sizes (100:500:20,000) for WGN are used to evaluate computational time (CPU time) of the three entropy algorithms. Observe that mean CPU times used for the SE and CSE are relatively similar (the SE performs slightly faster than the CSE), while, at the large sample sizes, mean CPU times used for the FE approach are much higher than for the other entropy approaches (the larger the sample size, the slower the computation of the FE approach).</p>
Full article ">
2659 KiB  
Article
Parametric PET Image Reconstruction via Regional Spatial Bases and Pharmacokinetic Time Activity Model
by Naoki Kawamura, Tatsuya Yokota, Hidekata Hontani, Muneyuki Sakata and Yuichi Kimura
Entropy 2017, 19(11), 629; https://doi.org/10.3390/e19110629 - 22 Nov 2017
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 4410
Abstract
It is known that the process of reconstruction of a Positron Emission Tomography (PET) image from sinogram data is very sensitive to measurement noises; it is still an important research topic to reconstruct PET images with high signal-to-noise ratios. In this paper, we [...] Read more.
It is known that the process of reconstruction of a Positron Emission Tomography (PET) image from sinogram data is very sensitive to measurement noises; it is still an important research topic to reconstruct PET images with high signal-to-noise ratios. In this paper, we propose a new reconstruction method for a temporal series of PET images from a temporal series of sinogram data. In the proposed method, PET images are reconstructed by minimizing the Kullback–Leibler divergence between the observed sinogram data and sinogram data derived from a parametric model of PET images. The contributions of the proposition include the following: (1) regions of targets in images are explicitly expressed using a set of spatial bases in order to ignore the noises in the background; (2) a parametric time activity model of PET images is explicitly introduced as a constraint; and (3) an algorithm for solving the optimization problem is clearly described. To demonstrate the advantages of the proposed method, quantitative evaluations are performed using both synthetic and clinical data of human brains. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Information Theory Applied to Physiological Signals)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Three-compartment model. (<b>b</b>) Simplified Reference Tissue Model (SRTM).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Description of reconstructed image through the proposed method.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Illustration of the proposed algorithm. Red arrows indicate multiplicative update operations <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mi mathvariant="script">G</mi> </semantics> </math>, and blue arrows indicate projections onto sets spanned by the SRTM <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mi mathvariant="script">P</mi> </semantics> </math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>NRMSE and RMSE results in terms of Poisson noise level. Each graph (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) is different in regions where the error is evaluated: (<b>a</b>) NRSME in whole images, (<b>b</b>) RMSE only in backgrounds and (<b>c</b>) RMSE only in the target region, <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mi> </semantics> </math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4 Cont.
<p>NRMSE and RMSE results in terms of Poisson noise level. Each graph (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) is different in regions where the error is evaluated: (<b>a</b>) NRSME in whole images, (<b>b</b>) RMSE only in backgrounds and (<b>c</b>) RMSE only in the target region, <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mi> </semantics> </math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Illustrations of three time frames picked from reconstructed image (<b>top</b>) and some corresponding tTACs (<b>bottom</b>) for each method. The SNR of simulated sinograms is 50 dB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Illustrations of three time frames picked from reconstructed image (<b>top</b>) and some corresponding tTACs (<b>bottom</b>) for each method. SNR of simulated sinograms is 35 dB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>NRMSE improvement of proposed method in terms of the number of projections, <span class="html-italic">k</span>. The colors of curves vary in initialization methods, which give initial values of <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">Z</mi> </semantics> </math> to the proposed method. The noise level of <math display="inline"> <semantics> <msub> <mover accent="true"> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">Y</mi> <mo stretchy="false">˜</mo> </mover> <mi>sml</mi> </msub> </semantics> </math> varies in each graph: (<b>a</b>) 45 dB, (<b>b</b>) 40 dB, (<b>c</b>) 35 dB and (<b>d</b>) 30 dB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7 Cont.
<p>NRMSE improvement of proposed method in terms of the number of projections, <span class="html-italic">k</span>. The colors of curves vary in initialization methods, which give initial values of <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">Z</mi> </semantics> </math> to the proposed method. The noise level of <math display="inline"> <semantics> <msub> <mover accent="true"> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">Y</mi> <mo stretchy="false">˜</mo> </mover> <mi>sml</mi> </msub> </semantics> </math> varies in each graph: (<b>a</b>) 45 dB, (<b>b</b>) 40 dB, (<b>c</b>) 35 dB and (<b>d</b>) 30 dB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>PET Data #1: Illustrations of reconstructed image with multiple methods (<b>left</b>) and some of their corresponding tissue Time Activity Curves (tTACs) (<b>right</b>). From left to right, four of 26 time frames (7, 10, 13 and 16) are described for each method (<b>left</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>PET Data #2: Illustrations of reconstructed image with multiple methods (<b>left</b>) and some of their corresponding tTACs (<b>right</b>). From left to right, four of 26 time frames (7, 10, 13 and 16) are described for each method (<b>left</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>PET Data #3: Illustrations of reconstructed image with multiple methods (<b>left</b>) and some of their corresponding tTACs (<b>right</b>). From left to right, four of 26 time frames (7, 10, 13 and 16) are described for each method (<b>left</b>).</p>
Full article ">
1209 KiB  
Article
Re-Evaluating Electromyogram–Force Relation in Healthy Biceps Brachii Muscles Using Complexity Measures
by Xiaofei Zhu, Xu Zhang, Xiao Tang, Xiaoping Gao and Xiang Chen
Entropy 2017, 19(11), 624; https://doi.org/10.3390/e19110624 - 19 Nov 2017
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 6240
Abstract
The objective of this study is to re-evaluate the relation between surface electromyogram (EMG) and muscle contraction torque in biceps brachii (BB) muscles of healthy subjects using two different complexity measures. Ten healthy subjects were recruited and asked to complete a series of [...] Read more.
The objective of this study is to re-evaluate the relation between surface electromyogram (EMG) and muscle contraction torque in biceps brachii (BB) muscles of healthy subjects using two different complexity measures. Ten healthy subjects were recruited and asked to complete a series of elbow flexion tasks following different isometric muscle contraction levels ranging from 10% to 80% of maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) with each increment of 10%. Meanwhile, both the elbow flexion torque and surface EMG data from the muscle were recorded. The root mean square (RMS), sample entropy (SampEn) and fuzzy entropy (FuzzyEn) of corresponding EMG data were analyzed for each contraction level, and the relation between EMG and muscle torque was accordingly quantified. The experimental results showed a nonlinear relation between the traditional RMS amplitude of EMG and the muscle torque. By contrast, the FuzzyEn of EMG exhibited an improved linear correlation with the muscle torque than the RMS amplitude of EMG, which indicates its great value in estimating BB muscle strength in a simple and straightforward manner. In addition, the SampEn of EMG was found to be insensitive to the varying muscle torques, almost presenting a flat trend with the increment of muscle force. Such a character of the SampEn implied its potential application as a promising surface EMG biomarker for examining neuromuscular changes while overcoming interference from muscle strength. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Information Theory Applied to Physiological Signals)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Examples of data segments selected from a representative subject at muscle contraction levels of 30% (<b>top</b>) and 70% (<b>bottom</b>) MVC, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Heaviside function and exponential function.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Pretest results illustrating effect of signal length on both SampEn and FuzzyEn. Please note that the resultant entropy values are normalized by the mean value at the signal length of 100.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Illustration of the EMG–torque relation for (<b>a</b>) RMS; (<b>b</b>) FuzzyEn.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Illustration of the EMG–torque relation for SampEn of subject 4 (<b>a</b>) and subject 5 (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">
2071 KiB  
Article
Multiscale Sample Entropy of Cardiovascular Signals: Does the Choice between Fixed- or Varying-Tolerance among Scales Influence Its Evaluation and Interpretation?
by Paolo Castiglioni, Paolo Coruzzi, Matteo Bini, Gianfranco Parati and Andrea Faini
Entropy 2017, 19(11), 590; https://doi.org/10.3390/e19110590 - 4 Nov 2017
Cited by 22 | Viewed by 5131
Abstract
Multiscale entropy (MSE) quantifies the cardiovascular complexity evaluating Sample Entropy (SampEn) on coarse-grained series at increasing scales ?. Two approaches exist, one using a fixed tolerance r at all scales (MSEFT), the other a varying tolerance r(? [...] Read more.
Multiscale entropy (MSE) quantifies the cardiovascular complexity evaluating Sample Entropy (SampEn) on coarse-grained series at increasing scales ?. Two approaches exist, one using a fixed tolerance r at all scales (MSEFT), the other a varying tolerance r(?) adjusted following the standard-deviation changes after coarse graining (MSEVT). The aim of this study is to clarify how the choice between MSEFT and MSEVT influences quantification and interpretation of cardiovascular MSE, and whether it affects some signals more than others. To achieve this aim, we considered 2-h long beat-by-beat recordings of inter-beat intervals and of systolic and diastolic blood pressures in male (N = 42) and female (N = 42) healthy volunteers. We compared MSE estimated with fixed and varying tolerances, and evaluated whether the choice between MSEFT and MSEVT estimators influence quantification and interpretation of sex-related differences. We found substantial discrepancies between MSEFT and MSEVT results, related to the degree of correlation among samples and more important for heart rate than for blood pressure; moreover the choice between MSEFT and MSEVT may influence the interpretation of gender differences for MSE of heart rate. We conclude that studies on cardiovascular complexity should carefully choose between fixed- or varying-tolerance estimators, particularly when evaluating MSE of heart rate. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Information Theory Applied to Physiological Signals)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Multiscale entropy (MSE) estimated for <span class="html-italic">m</span> = 2 with fixed- (<b>a</b>) and varying- tolerance (<b>b</b>) for white noise, “1/<span class="html-italic">f</span>” noise and brownian motion: mean ± <span class="html-italic">SD</span>. Results from 100 series generated for each type of noise (see methods). Note that <span class="html-italic">MSE<sub>FT</sub></span> and <span class="html-italic">MSE<sub>VT</sub></span> coincide at <span class="html-italic">τ</span> = 1.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Standard Deviation of <span class="html-italic">MSE<sub>FT</sub></span> (black) and <span class="html-italic">MSE<sub>VT</sub></span> (red) estimates for white noise (<b>a</b>); “1/<span class="html-italic">f</span>” noise (<b>b</b>) and brown noise (<b>c</b>). Results from the same synthesized series of <a href="#entropy-19-00590-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p><span class="html-italic">MSE<sub>VT</sub></span> (red lines) and <span class="html-italic">MSE<sub>FT</sub></span> (black lines) for inter-beat interval (IBI), systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) series, and embedding dimensions <span class="html-italic">m</span> from 1 to 3. Mean ± 95% confidence intervals of the mean over the group (<span class="html-italic">N</span> = 84).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Standard deviations of <span class="html-italic">MSE<sub>VT</sub></span> (red) and <span class="html-italic">MSE<sub>FT</sub></span> (black) estimates over the same group of volunteers of <a href="#entropy-19-00590-f003" class="html-fig">Figure 3</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Comparison among signals of <span class="html-italic">MSE<sub>FT</sub></span> (<b>a</b>) and <span class="html-italic">MSE<sub>FT</sub></span> (<b>b</b>). Mean ± 95% confidence intervals over the group (<span class="html-italic">N</span> = 84) for <span class="html-italic">m</span> = 1.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>IBI multiscale entropy: comparison between males (M, <span class="html-italic">N</span> = 42) and females (F, <span class="html-italic">N</span> = 42). Upper panels: <span class="html-italic">MSE<sub>FT</sub></span> (<b>a</b>) and <span class="html-italic">MSE<sub>VT</sub></span> (<b>b</b>) mean and 95% confidence interval for <span class="html-italic">m</span> = 1. Lower panels: Mann-Whitney U statistics for males vs. females at each <span class="html-italic">τ</span>; the dashed line is the 5% threshold of statistical significance; U values above the threshold (in red) indicate significant differences.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p><span class="html-italic">MSE<sub>FT</sub></span> (<b>a</b>) and <span class="html-italic">MSE<sub>VT</sub></span> (<b>b</b>) of SBP in males (M) and females (F). See <a href="#entropy-19-00590-f006" class="html-fig">Figure 6</a> for symbols.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p><span class="html-italic">MSE<sub>FT</sub></span> (<b>a</b>) and <span class="html-italic">MSE<sub>VT</sub></span> (<b>b</b>) of DBP in males (M) and females (F). See <a href="#entropy-19-00590-f006" class="html-fig">Figure 6</a> for symbols.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Relation between changes in the varying tolerance <span class="html-italic">r</span>(<span class="html-italic">τ</span>) (upper panels) and in the difference between fixed- and varying-tolerance estimates of multiscale entropy, <span class="html-italic">MSE<sub>FT</sub></span> − <span class="html-italic">MSE<sub>VT</sub></span> (lower panels), with increasing <span class="html-italic">τ</span>, for synthesized signals (left) and for real cardiovascular signals (right). The fixed tolerance <span class="html-italic">r</span> = 0.20 used in <span class="html-italic">MSE<sub>FT</sub></span> (dashed line in upper panels) is shown as reference.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Mean ± 95% confidence intervals of the mean over the group (<span class="html-italic">N</span> = 84) for fixed-tolerance MSE of IBI and <span class="html-italic">m</span> = 3 estimated by left-sided coarse grainings only (<span class="html-italic">MSE<sup>L</sup><sub>FT</sub></span>, panel (<b>a</b>)); by averaging left- and right-sided coarse grainings (<span class="html-italic">MSE<sub>FT</sub></span>, panel (<b>b</b>)); and by Composite MSE (<span class="html-italic">CMSE<sub>FT</sub></span>, panel (<b>c</b>)).</p>
Full article ">
808 KiB  
Article
Challenging Recently Published Parameter Sets for Entropy Measures in Risk Prediction for End-Stage Renal Disease Patients
by Stefan Hagmair, Martin Bachler, Matthias C. Braunisch, Georg Lorenz, Christoph Schmaderer, Anna-Lena Hasenau, Lukas Von Stülpnagel, Axel Bauer, Kostantinos D. Rizas, Siegfried Wassertheurer and Christopher C. Mayer
Entropy 2017, 19(11), 582; https://doi.org/10.3390/e19110582 - 31 Oct 2017
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 4529
Abstract
Heart rate variability (HRV) analysis is a non-invasive tool for assessing cardiac health. Entropy measures quantify the chaotic properties of HRV, but they are sensitive to the choice of their required parameters. Previous studies therefore have performed parameter optimization, targeting solely their particular [...] Read more.
Heart rate variability (HRV) analysis is a non-invasive tool for assessing cardiac health. Entropy measures quantify the chaotic properties of HRV, but they are sensitive to the choice of their required parameters. Previous studies therefore have performed parameter optimization, targeting solely their particular patient cohort. In contrast, this work aimed to challenge entropy measures with recently published parameter sets, without time-consuming optimization, for risk prediction in end-stage renal disease patients. Approximate entropy, sample entropy, fuzzy entropy, fuzzy measure entropy, and corrected approximate entropy were examined. In total, 265 hemodialysis patients from the ISAR (rISk strAtification in end-stage Renal disease) study were analyzed. Throughout a median follow-up time of 43 months, 70 patients died. Fuzzy entropy and corrected approximate entropy (CApEn) provided significant hazard ratios, which remained significant after adjustment for clinical risk factors from literature if an entropy maximizing threshold parameter was chosen. Revealing results were seen in the subgroup of patients with heart disease (HD) when setting the radius to a multiple of the data’s standard deviation ( r = 0.2 · ? ); all entropies, except CApEn, predicted mortality significantly and remained significant after adjustment. Therefore, these two parameter settings seem to reflect different cardiac properties. This work shows the potential of entropy measures for cardiovascular risk stratification in cohorts the parameters were not optimized for, and it provides additional insights into the parameter choice. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Information Theory Applied to Physiological Signals)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Flow chart of the study population.Flow chart of data.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Hazard ratios (HR) for (<b>A</b>) all data; (<b>B</b>) subgroup of patients without heart disease (HD); and (<b>C</b>) patients with HD. HRs are plotted as diamonds with their corresponding 95% confidence interval.</p>
Full article ">
856 KiB  
Article
Entropy of Entropy: Measurement of Dynamical Complexity for Biological Systems
by Chang Francis Hsu, Sung-Yang Wei, Han-Ping Huang, Long Hsu, Sien Chi and Chung-Kang Peng
Entropy 2017, 19(10), 550; https://doi.org/10.3390/e19100550 - 18 Oct 2017
Cited by 35 | Viewed by 7947
Abstract
Healthy systems exhibit complex dynamics on the changing of information embedded in physiologic signals on multiple time scales that can be quantified by employing multiscale entropy (MSE) analysis. Here, we propose a measure of complexity, called entropy of entropy (EoE) analysis. The analysis [...] Read more.
Healthy systems exhibit complex dynamics on the changing of information embedded in physiologic signals on multiple time scales that can be quantified by employing multiscale entropy (MSE) analysis. Here, we propose a measure of complexity, called entropy of entropy (EoE) analysis. The analysis combines the features of MSE and an alternate measure of information, called superinformation, useful for DNA sequences. In this work, we apply the hybrid analysis to the cardiac interbeat interval time series. We find that the EoE value is significantly higher for the healthy than the pathologic groups. Particularly, short time series of 70 heart beats is sufficient for EoE analysis with an accuracy of 81% and longer series of 500 beats results in an accuracy of 90%. In addition, the EoE versus Shannon entropy plot of heart rate time series exhibits an inverted U relationship with the maximal EoE value appearing in the middle of extreme order and disorder. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Information Theory Applied to Physiological Signals)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Illustration of the two-step-operation of the entropy of entropy (EoE) method. The left column shows the three original heartbeat intervals time series of a congestive heart failure (CHF), the healthy, and the atrial fibrillation (AF) subjects with each of <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mi>N</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>70</mn> </mrow> </semantics> </math> data points. First, each original time series is equally divided into 14 (=<span class="html-italic">N</span>/<math display="inline"> <semantics> <mi>τ</mi> </semantics> </math>) windows of <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mi>τ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>5</mn> </mrow> </semantics> </math> data points in red frames. The range of the interbeat intervals from <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>x</mi> <mrow> <mi>m</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>n</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </semantics> </math> to <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>x</mi> <mrow> <mi>m</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>x</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>6</mn> </mrow> </semantics> </math>, derived from the three databases on PhysioNet, is equally divided into <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>s</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>55</mn> </mrow> </semantics> </math> slices. This results in three coarse-grained sequences of 14 representative states in terms of Shannon entropy values as shown in the right column. Second, as illustrated by the grey lines in the right column, there are <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>s</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi>τ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>5</mn> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> <mo>=</mo> <mn>7</mn> </mrow> </semantics> </math> possible levels to accommodate all Shannon entropy values derived at <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mi>τ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>5</mn> </mrow> </semantics> </math>. As a result, the Shannon entropy values of the three sequences from the CHF, the healthy, and the AF subjects are 0.41, 1.40, and 0.41, respectively. They are the EoE values of the three original time series.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>&lt;EoE&gt; vs. time scale <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mi>τ</mi> </semantics> </math> at <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>s</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>55</mn> </mrow> </semantics> </math> for the 90, 75, and 72 sets of short time series with each of (<b>a</b>) 70 and (<b>b</b>) 500 data points from the NSRDB, the CHFDB, and the LTAFDB. The separation of the healthy group from the two pathologic groups of CHF and AF is significant for <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mi>τ</mi> </semantics> </math> ≥ 5. (<math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mi>p</mi> <mo>&lt;</mo> <msup> <mn>10</mn> <mrow> <mo>−</mo> <mn>14</mn> </mrow> </msup> </mrow> </semantics> </math> for the healthy and the pathologic group of CHF and AF; Student’s <span class="html-italic">t</span>-test). Symbols represent the mean values of &lt;EoE&gt; for each group and bars represent the standard error (<math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mi>S</mi> <mi>E</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mi>S</mi> <mi>D</mi> <mo>/</mo> <msqrt> <mi>n</mi> </msqrt> </mrow> </semantics> </math>, where <span class="html-italic">n</span> is the number of sets).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>EoE vs. Shannon entropy for the same 237 sets of short time series with each of (<b>a</b>) 70 and (<b>b</b>) 500 data points. The 75 diamond, 90 circle, and the 72 triangle symbols are from 15 CHF, 18 healthy, and 72 AF subjects. The EoE and the Shannon entropy are computed at <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mi>τ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>5</mn> </mrow> </semantics> </math> and <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>s</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>55</mn> </mrow> </semantics> </math>. In addition, the dashed line is a quadratic fitting.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The inverted U relationship between (complexity) and Shannon entropy interval (disorder) associated with 11,600 sets of short time series from 116 subjects. The range of Shannon entropy from 0 to 3.5 is divided into 35 equal intervals. The mean and standard error of the EoEs distributed over each interval is computed. Note that the maximal EoE value appears in the middle of extreme order and disorder.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>EoE accuracy as a function of <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mi>τ</mi> </semantics> </math> and <math display="inline"> <semantics> <msub> <mi>s</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </semantics> </math> for the 237 sets of short time series with each of 70, 300, and 500 data points. There is a plateau in the central region of the graph.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>EoE analysis of 100 simulated Gaussian distributed white noise and 1/f noise time series, with each of 5000 data points. Symbols represent the mean values of EoE for the 100 time series and error bars the SD.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The relationship between the accuracies of multiscale entropy (MSE) and EoE methods on the 218 sets of short time series and the lengths of the time series that are extracted to range from 70 to 10,000.</p>
Full article ">
2554 KiB  
Article
A Permutation Disalignment Index-Based Complex Network Approach to Evaluate Longitudinal Changes in Brain-Electrical Connectivity
by Nadia Mammone, Simona De Salvo, Cosimo Ieracitano, Silvia Marino, Angela Marra, Francesco Corallo and Francesco C. Morabito
Entropy 2017, 19(10), 548; https://doi.org/10.3390/e19100548 - 17 Oct 2017
Cited by 19 | Viewed by 6005
Abstract
In the study of neurological disorders, Electroencephalographic (EEG) signal processing can provide valuable information because abnormalities in the interaction between neuron circuits may reflect on macroscopic abnormalities in the electrical potentials that can be detected on the scalp. A Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) [...] Read more.
In the study of neurological disorders, Electroencephalographic (EEG) signal processing can provide valuable information because abnormalities in the interaction between neuron circuits may reflect on macroscopic abnormalities in the electrical potentials that can be detected on the scalp. A Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) condition, when caused by a disorder degenerating into dementia, affects the brain connectivity. Motivated by the promising results achieved through the recently developed descriptor of coupling strength between EEG signals, the Permutation Disalignment Index (PDI), the present paper introduces a novel PDI-based complex network model to evaluate the longitudinal variations in brain-electrical connectivity. A group of 33 amnestic MCI subjects was enrolled and followed-up with over four months. The results were compared to MoCA (Montreal Cognitive Assessment) tests, which scores the cognitive abilities of the patient. A significant negative correlation could be observed between MoCA variation and the characteristic path length ( ? ) variation ( r = - 0 . 56 , p = 0 . 0006 ), whereas a significant positive correlation could be observed between MoCA variation and the variation of clustering coefficient (CC, r = 0 . 58 , p = 0 . 0004 ), global efficiency (GE, r = 0 . 57 , p = 0 . 0005 ) and small worldness (SW, r = 0 . 57 , p = 0 . 0005 ). Cognitive decline thus seems to reflect an underlying cortical “disconnection” phenomenon: worsened subjects indeed showed an increased ? and decreased CC, GE and SW. The PDI-based connectivity model, proposed in the present work, could be a novel tool for the objective quantification of longitudinal brain-electrical connectivity changes in MCI subjects. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Information Theory Applied to Physiological Signals)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The first step consists of recording the EEG (both at time T0 and T1) and storing it on a computer. The EEG is segmented into <span class="html-italic">M</span> non-overlapping epochs and then it is analysed epoch by epoch. For every epoch <span class="html-italic">e</span>, given the corresponding EEG segment <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mi>E</mi> <mi>E</mi> <msup> <mi>G</mi> <mi>e</mi> </msup> </mrow> </semantics> </math> (with <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mi>e</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mo>⋯</mo> <mo>,</mo> <mi>M</mi> </mrow> </semantics> </math>), delta, theta, alpha and beta EEG rhythms (sub-bands) are extracted. Every rhythm is processed independently. For every epoch <span class="html-italic">e</span> and every rhythm, every pair of channels <math display="inline"> <semantics> <msub> <mi>x</mi> <mi>i</mi> </msub> </semantics> </math> and <math display="inline"> <semantics> <msub> <mi>x</mi> <mi>j</mi> </msub> </semantics> </math> is processed and the corresponding <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mi>P</mi> <mi>D</mi> <msub> <mi>I</mi> <mrow> <msub> <mi>x</mi> <mi>i</mi> </msub> <mo>,</mo> <msub> <mi>x</mi> <mi>j</mi> </msub> </mrow> </msub> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi>e</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </semantics> </math> is estimated. A dissimilarity matrix is then constructed where the dissimilarity between <math display="inline"> <semantics> <msub> <mi>x</mi> <mi>i</mi> </msub> </semantics> </math> and <math display="inline"> <semantics> <msub> <mi>x</mi> <mi>j</mi> </msub> </semantics> </math> is <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mi>P</mi> <mi>D</mi> <msub> <mi>I</mi> <mrow> <msub> <mi>x</mi> <mi>i</mi> </msub> <mo>,</mo> <msub> <mi>x</mi> <mi>j</mi> </msub> </mrow> </msub> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi>e</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </semantics> </math>, which is inversely proportional to the coupling strength between <math display="inline"> <semantics> <msub> <mi>x</mi> <mi>i</mi> </msub> </semantics> </math> and <math display="inline"> <semantics> <msub> <mi>x</mi> <mi>j</mi> </msub> </semantics> </math>. The dissimilarity matrices are then averaged over the epochs and the complex network parameters are extracted from the average dissimilarity matrix. In this way, the connectivity of the EEG (either at T0 and T1) is described by the network parameters. By comparing the network parameters at T0 and at T1, changes in the network organization can be estimated.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Variation (from time T0 to T1) of the complex network parameters <math display="inline"> <semantics> <msub> <mi>λ</mi> <mi>n</mi> </msub> </semantics> </math>, <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mi>C</mi> <msub> <mi>C</mi> <mi>n</mi> </msub> </mrow> </semantics> </math>, <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mi>G</mi> <msub> <mi>E</mi> <mi>n</mi> </msub> </mrow> </semantics> </math> and <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mi>S</mi> <msub> <mi>W</mi> <mi>n</mi> </msub> </mrow> </semantics> </math>, for every patient, in every sub-band (delta, theta, alpha and beta) as well as in the overall range (0.5–32 Hz).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Correlation between MoCA variation and the variation of every complex network parameter <math display="inline"> <semantics> <msub> <mi>λ</mi> <mi>n</mi> </msub> </semantics> </math>, <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mi>C</mi> <msub> <mi>C</mi> <mi>n</mi> </msub> </mrow> </semantics> </math>, <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mi>G</mi> <msub> <mi>E</mi> <mi>n</mi> </msub> </mrow> </semantics> </math> and <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mi>S</mi> <msub> <mi>W</mi> <mi>n</mi> </msub> </mrow> </semantics> </math>. The scatter points of subjects with worsened MoCA are marked with a red circle whereas stable subjects (zero or positive MoCA variation) are marked with a blue circle. Each subplot reports the corresponding <span class="html-italic">r</span> and <span class="html-italic">p</span> value, estimated by the Pearson’s linear correlation test. (<b>a</b>) total range (0.5–32 Hz); (<b>b</b>) delta range (0.5–4 Hz); (<b>c</b>) theta range (4–8 Hz); (<b>d</b>) alpha range (8–13 Hz); and (<b>e</b>) beta range (13–32 Hz);</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Explanatory eccentricity scalp mapping of two worsened subjects (pt 51 and 71) and two stable subjects (pt 127 and 128). Given the minimum and maximum values of eccentricity at times T0 and T1, Emax (T0), Emin (T0), Emax (T1) and Emin (T1), the maps were both normalized with respect to <span class="html-italic">Emin</span>, the minimum between Emin (T0) and Emin (T1), and <span class="html-italic">Emax</span>, the maximum between Emax (T0) and Emax (T1). The colour gradation ranges from blue (Emin) to red (Emax). The colouration of the areas in between two electrodes was interpolated [<a href="#B30-entropy-19-00548" class="html-bibr">30</a>]. The active connections, when applying a 0.5 thresholding (PDI &lt; 0.5), are also shown.</p>
Full article ">
889 KiB  
Article
Automatic Epileptic Seizure Detection in EEG Signals Using Multi-Domain Feature Extraction and Nonlinear Analysis
by Lina Wang, Weining Xue, Yang Li, Meilin Luo, Jie Huang, Weigang Cui and Chao Huang
Entropy 2017, 19(6), 222; https://doi.org/10.3390/e19060222 - 27 May 2017
Cited by 225 | Viewed by 15466
Abstract
Epileptic seizure detection is commonly implemented by expert clinicians with visual observation of electroencephalography (EEG) signals, which tends to be time consuming and sensitive to bias. The epileptic detection in most previous research suffers from low power and unsuitability for processing large datasets. [...] Read more.
Epileptic seizure detection is commonly implemented by expert clinicians with visual observation of electroencephalography (EEG) signals, which tends to be time consuming and sensitive to bias. The epileptic detection in most previous research suffers from low power and unsuitability for processing large datasets. Therefore, a computerized epileptic seizure detection method is highly required to eradicate the aforementioned problems, expedite epilepsy research and aid medical professionals. In this work, we propose an automatic epilepsy diagnosis framework based on the combination of multi-domain feature extraction and nonlinear analysis of EEG signals. Firstly, EEG signals are pre-processed by using the wavelet threshold method to remove the artifacts. We then extract representative features in the time domain, frequency domain, time-frequency domain and nonlinear analysis features based on the information theory. These features are further extracted in five frequency sub-bands based on the clinical interest, and the dimension of the original feature space is then reduced by using both a principal component analysis and an analysis of variance. Furthermore, the optimal combination of the extracted features is identified and evaluated via different classifiers for the epileptic seizure detection of EEG signals. Finally, the performance of the proposed method is investigated by using a public EEG database at the University Hospital Bonn, Germany. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed epileptic seizure detection method can achieve a high average accuracy of 99.25%, indicating a powerful method in the detection and classification of epileptic seizures. The proposed seizure detection scheme is thus hoped to eliminate the burden of expert clinicians when they are processing a large number of data by visual observation and to speed-up the epilepsy diagnosis. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Information Theory Applied to Physiological Signals)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>A flowchart of the proposed classification framework.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Four level decomposition of an EEG signal from five sub-bands of the clinical interest, where colored boxes indicate five sub-bands of the clinical interest.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Wavelet threshold de-nosing results. (<b>a</b>) Original EEG signals in the time domain; (<b>b</b>) Processed EEG signals in the time domain.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Different sub-band signals using four level wavelet decomposition from an original EEG signal. (a<math display="inline"> <semantics> <msub> <mrow/> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </semantics> </math>) the approximation of 0–32 Hz, (a<math display="inline"> <semantics> <msub> <mrow/> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </semantics> </math>) the approximation of 0–16 Hz, (a<math display="inline"> <semantics> <msub> <mrow/> <mn>3</mn> </msub> </semantics> </math>) the approximation of 0–8 Hz, (a<math display="inline"> <semantics> <msub> <mrow/> <mn>4</mn> </msub> </semantics> </math>) the approximation of 0–4 Hz; (d<math display="inline"> <semantics> <msub> <mrow/> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </semantics> </math>) the detail of 32–64 Hz, (d<math display="inline"> <semantics> <msub> <mrow/> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </semantics> </math>) the detail of 16–32 Hz, (d<math display="inline"> <semantics> <msub> <mrow/> <mn>3</mn> </msub> </semantics> </math>) the detail of 8–16 Hz, (d<math display="inline"> <semantics> <msub> <mrow/> <mn>4</mn> </msub> </semantics> </math>) the detail of 4–8 Hz.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Different sub-band signals using four level wavelet decomposition from the denoised EEG signal. (a<math display="inline"> <semantics> <msub> <mrow/> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </semantics> </math>) the approximation of 0–32 Hz, (a<math display="inline"> <semantics> <msub> <mrow/> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </semantics> </math>) the approximation of 0–16 Hz, (a<math display="inline"> <semantics> <msub> <mrow/> <mn>3</mn> </msub> </semantics> </math>) the approximation of 0–8 Hz, (a<math display="inline"> <semantics> <msub> <mrow/> <mn>4</mn> </msub> </semantics> </math>) the approximation of 0–4 Hz; (d<math display="inline"> <semantics> <msub> <mrow/> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </semantics> </math>) the detail of 32–64 Hz, (d<math display="inline"> <semantics> <msub> <mrow/> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </semantics> </math>) the detail of 16–32 Hz, (d<math display="inline"> <semantics> <msub> <mrow/> <mn>3</mn> </msub> </semantics> </math>) the detail of 8–16 Hz, (d<math display="inline"> <semantics> <msub> <mrow/> <mn>4</mn> </msub> </semantics> </math>) the detail of 4–8 Hz.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p><span class="html-italic">p</span>-values (FDR adjusted) for features via ANOVA.</p>
Full article ">
3987 KiB  
Article
Investigation of the Intra- and Inter-Limb Muscle Coordination of Hands-and-Knees Crawling in Human Adults by Means of Muscle Synergy Analysis
by Xiang Chen, Xiaocong Niu, De Wu, Yi Yu and Xu Zhang
Entropy 2017, 19(5), 229; https://doi.org/10.3390/e19050229 - 17 May 2017
Cited by 24 | Viewed by 8173
Abstract
To investigate the intra- and inter-limb muscle coordination mechanism of human hands-and-knees crawling by means of muscle synergy analysis, surface electromyographic (sEMG) signals of 20 human adults were collected bilaterally from 32 limb related muscles during crawling with hands and knees at different [...] Read more.
To investigate the intra- and inter-limb muscle coordination mechanism of human hands-and-knees crawling by means of muscle synergy analysis, surface electromyographic (sEMG) signals of 20 human adults were collected bilaterally from 32 limb related muscles during crawling with hands and knees at different speeds. The nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF) algorithm was exerted on each limb to extract muscle synergies. The results showed that intra-limb coordination was relatively stable during human hands-and-knees crawling. Two synergies, one relating to the stance phase and the other relating to the swing phase, could be extracted from each limb during a crawling cycle. Synergy structures during different speeds kept good consistency, but the recruitment levels, durations, and phases of muscle synergies were adjusted to adapt the change of crawling speed. Furthermore, the ipsilateral phase lag (IPL) value which was used to depict the inter-limb coordination changed with crawling speed for most subjects, and subjects using the no-limb-pairing mode at low speed tended to adopt the trot-like mode or pace-like mode at high speed. The research results could be well explained by the two-level central pattern generator (CPG) model consisting of a half-center rhythm generator (RG) and a pattern formation (PF) circuit. This study sheds light on the underlying control mechanism of human crawling. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Information Theory Applied to Physiological Signals)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The research route of this study.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Placement of sEMG sensors and accelerometers. Red font means flexor and black font means extensor.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Evaluation parameters for two recruitment patterns (<span class="html-italic">C1</span>, <span class="html-italic">C1'</span>) of two synergies with similar structure. As in [<a href="#B17-entropy-19-00229" class="html-bibr">17</a>], <span class="html-italic">V</span><sub>th</sub> of each profile was set to the half-maximum value.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Three inter-limb coordination patterns of human crawling [<a href="#B6-entropy-19-00229" class="html-bibr">6</a>]. Solid lines represent the duration of stance phases and spaces represent the swing phases for each limb.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Statistics of the <span class="html-italic">VAF</span> values corresponding to different number of muscle synergies extracted from each limb (RA: right arm; LA: left arm; RL: right leg; LL: left leg) of all subjects under different speeds.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>An example of muscle synergies extracted from the right arm of one subject. ACC_ra represents the acceleration data of the limb used to detect the stance and swing phase.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Illustration of the typical sEMG envelopes during crawling cycles at different speeds.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Cycle duration, stance phase duration, and swing phase duration (Mean ± SD) at different crawling speeds.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Limb phase lags at different speeds. (<b>a</b>) Contralateral phase lags; (<b>b</b>) Diagonal phase lags; (<b>c</b>) Ipsilateral phase lags.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Synergy structures and recruitment patterns extracted from four limbs of all 20 subjects. Recruitment patterns of leg muscles are plotted separately according their inter-limb coordination patterns.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Effects of speed on (<b>a</b>) synergy structures and recruitment patterns of two similar synergies; (<b>b</b>) Recruitment level differences (<span class="html-italic">∆p</span>); (<b>c</b>) Recruitment phase lags (<span class="html-italic">∆ph</span>); (<b>d</b>) Recruitment time length differences (<span class="html-italic">∆tl</span>). <span class="html-italic">T</span>-tests were performed between 1.8-1 and 1.4-1, and between 2.2-1 and 1.4-1, respectively. * means <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05.</p>
Full article ">
2200 KiB  
Article
Muscle Fatigue Analysis of the Deltoid during Three Head-Related Static Isometric Contraction Tasks
by Wenxiang Cui, Xiang Chen, Shuai Cao and Xu Zhang
Entropy 2017, 19(5), 221; https://doi.org/10.3390/e19050221 - 11 May 2017
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 7338
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the fatiguing characteristics of muscle-tendon units (MTUs) within skeletal muscles during static isometric contraction tasks. The deltoid was selected as the target muscle and three head-related static isometric contraction tasks were designed to activate three heads of the [...] Read more.
This study aimed to investigate the fatiguing characteristics of muscle-tendon units (MTUs) within skeletal muscles during static isometric contraction tasks. The deltoid was selected as the target muscle and three head-related static isometric contraction tasks were designed to activate three heads of the deltoid in different modes. Nine male subjects participated in this study. Surface electromyography (SEMG) signals were collected synchronously from the three heads of the deltoid. The performances of five SEMG parameters, including root mean square (RMS), mean power frequency (MPF), the first coefficient of autoregressive model (ARC1), sample entropy (SE) and Higuchi’s fractal dimension (HFD), in quantification of fatigue, were evaluated in terms of sensitivity to variability ratio (SVR) and consistency firstly. Then, the HFD parameter was selected as the fatigue index for further muscle fatigue analysis. The experimental results demonstrated that the three deltoid heads presented different activation modes during three head-related fatiguing contractions. The fatiguing characteristics of the three heads were found to be task-dependent, and the heads kept in a relatively high activation level were more prone to fatigue. In addition, the differences in fatiguing rate between heads increased with the increase in load. The findings of this study can be helpful in better understanding the underlying neuromuscular control strategies of the central nervous system (CNS). Based on the results of this study, the CNS was thought to control the contraction of the deltoid by taking the three heads as functional units, but a certain synergy among heads might also exist to accomplish a contraction task. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Information Theory Applied to Physiological Signals)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Three head-related static isometric contraction tasks: (<b>a</b>) Task 1; (<b>b</b>) Task 2; (<b>c</b>) Task 3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Placement of EMG sensors on the deltoid. Here “Ch” denotes the channel of EMG sensor.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p><span class="html-italic">MRMS</span> of the three deltoid heads during three head-related tasks with different loads. The boxes and whiskers show the mean and standard deviation respectively for all nine subjects.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>SVR indexes of five SEMG parameters for the anterior head (<b>a</b>), the lateral head (<b>b</b>) and the posterior head (<b>c</b>) during three isometric contraction tasks with different loads. The boxes and whiskers show the mean and standard deviation values for all nine subjects.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Proportional distribution of two classes, corresponding to the positive or negative characteristics of linear regression slopes for five SEMG parameters. (<b>a</b>) In the anterior head; (<b>b</b>) In the lateral head; (<b>c</b>) In the posterior head.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The linear fit of HFD against time (number of epochs) in the three heads of the deltoid under nine conditions for one subject. (<b>a</b>) Task1 and load = 1 kg; (<b>b</b>) Task1 and load = 2 kg; (<b>c</b>) Task1 and load = 3 kg; (<b>d</b>) Task2 and load = 1 kg; (<b>e</b>) Task2 and load = 2 kg; (<b>f</b>) Task2 and load = 3 kg; (<b>g</b>) Task3 and load = 1 kg; (<b>h</b>) Task3 and load = 2 kg; (<b>i</b>) Task3 and load = 3 kg.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Boxplot of linear regression slopes of HFD for all subjects under different conditions. Box plots show the results for all subjects, the middle line in each box plot represents the median value, and the whisker indicates the range. The bottom and top limits of each box reveal the interquartile range and black plus signs denote outliers.</p>
Full article ">

Review

Jump to: Research

29 pages, 1005 KiB  
Review
Information Theoretic Approaches for Motor-Imagery BCI Systems: Review and Experimental Comparison
by Rubén Martín-Clemente, Javier Olias, Deepa Beeta Thiyam, Andrzej Cichocki and Sergio Cruces
Entropy 2018, 20(1), 7; https://doi.org/10.3390/e20010007 - 2 Jan 2018
Cited by 28 | Viewed by 7311
Abstract
Brain computer interfaces (BCIs) have been attracting a great interest in recent years. The common spatial patterns (CSP) technique is a well-established approach to the spatial filtering of the electroencephalogram (EEG) data in BCI applications. Even though CSP was originally proposed from a [...] Read more.
Brain computer interfaces (BCIs) have been attracting a great interest in recent years. The common spatial patterns (CSP) technique is a well-established approach to the spatial filtering of the electroencephalogram (EEG) data in BCI applications. Even though CSP was originally proposed from a heuristic viewpoint, it can be also built on very strong foundations using information theory. This paper reviews the relationship between CSP and several information-theoretic approaches, including the Kullback–Leibler divergence, the Beta divergence and the Alpha-Beta log-det (AB-LD)divergence. We also revise other approaches based on the idea of selecting those features that are maximally informative about the class labels. The performance of all the methods will be also compared via experiments. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Information Theory Applied to Physiological Signals)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Electrode locations of the international 10–20 system for EEG recording. The letters “F”, “T”, “C”, “P” and “O” stand for frontal, temporal, central, parietal and occipital lobes, respectively. Even numbers correspond to electrodes placed on the right hemisphere, whereas odd numbers refer to those on the left hemisphere. The “z” refers to electrodes placed in the midline.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Illustration of the Alpha-Beta log-det divergence (AB-LD) divergence <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mi>D</mi> <mrow> <mi>L</mi> <mi>D</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi>α</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>β</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </msubsup> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <msub> <mo mathvariant="bold">Σ</mo> <mn>1</mn> </msub> <mo>∥</mo> <msub> <mo mathvariant="bold">Σ</mo> <mn>2</mn> </msub> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </semantics> </math> in the <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi>α</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>β</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </semantics> </math>-plane. Note that the position of each divergence is specified by the value of the hyperparameters <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi>α</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>β</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </semantics> </math>. This parameterization smoothly connects several positive definite matrix divergences, such as the squared Riemannian metric (<math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mi>α</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mi>β</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> </mrow> </semantics> </math>), the KL matrix divergence or Stein’s loss (<math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mi>α</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mi>β</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> </mrow> </semantics> </math>), the dual KL matrix divergence (<math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mi>α</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mi>β</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </semantics> </math>) and the <span class="html-italic">S</span>-divergence (<math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mi>α</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mstyle scriptlevel="0" displaystyle="false"> <mfrac> <mn>1</mn> <mn>2</mn> </mfrac> </mstyle> <mo>,</mo> <mi>β</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mstyle scriptlevel="0" displaystyle="false"> <mfrac> <mn>1</mn> <mn>2</mn> </mfrac> </mstyle> </mrow> </semantics> </math>), among others.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>This figure shows the evolution of the common spatial patterns (CSP) criterion function (in blue line), the symmetrized Kullback–Leibler divergence (sKL) (in red line), the symmetrized beta divergence (in purple line) and the AB-LD divergence (in yellow line), all of them as a function of the components of the spatial filter <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">w</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mo>[</mo> <msub> <mi>w</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> <mo>,</mo> <msub> <mi>w</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> <mo>]</mo> </mrow> </semantics> </math> in the two-dimensional case, where it is assumed that <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mrow> <mo>∥</mo> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">w</mi> <mo>∥</mo> </mrow> <mn>2</mn> <mn>2</mn> </msubsup> <mo>=</mo> <msubsup> <mi>w</mi> <mn>1</mn> <mn>2</mn> </msubsup> <mo>+</mo> <msubsup> <mi>w</mi> <mn>2</mn> <mn>2</mn> </msubsup> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </semantics> </math>. All the divergences are normalized with respect to their maximum values, and no regularization has been applied. Observe the coincidence of all the critical points. The covariance matrices were generated at random in this experiment.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Architecture of filter bank CSP. LDA is shorthand for Linear Discriminant Analysis.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Illustration of the advantages in performance of using an automatic cross-validation method to estimate the best even number of features <span class="html-italic">d</span> with respect to using an a priori fixed value of <span class="html-italic">d</span>. The automatic method relies on the technique proposed in [<a href="#B72-entropy-20-00007" class="html-bibr">72</a>], which was implemented here using one-sided <span class="html-italic">t</span>-tests of significance instead of the original two-sided tests. (<b>a</b>) Scatter plot comparison of the accuracies (in percentage) obtained by the CSP algorithm for fixed <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mi>d</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>8</mn> </mrow> </semantics> </math> (<span class="html-italic">x</span>-axis) and for the automatic estimation of <span class="html-italic">d</span> (<span class="html-italic">y</span>-axis); (<b>b</b>) histogram of the estimated best even number of features <span class="html-italic">d</span>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Comparison of the expected accuracy percentages obtained by each of the considered algorithms. The figure shows box-plot illustrations where the median is shown in red line, while the 25% and 75% percentiles are respectively at the bottom and top of each box. Larger positive values <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mi>T</mi> <mo>−</mo> <mi>S</mi> <mi>T</mi> <mi>A</mi> <mi>T</mi> <mo>≫</mo> <mn>0</mn> </mrow> </semantics> </math> and smaller <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mi>P</mi> <mo>−</mo> <mi>V</mi> <mi>A</mi> <mi>L</mi> <mo>≪</mo> <mn>1</mn> <mo>/</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </semantics> </math> would correspond with greater expected improvements over CSP. However, none of the <span class="html-italic">p</span>-values, which are shown below their respective box-plots, is able to attain the <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mn>5</mn> <mo>%</mo> </mrow> </semantics> </math> threshold level of significance (<math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mi>P</mi> <mo>−</mo> <mi>V</mi> <mi>A</mi> <mi>L</mi> <mo>&lt;</mo> <mn>0.05</mn> </mrow> </semantics> </math>), so the possible improvements cannot be claimed to be statistically significant with respect to those obtained by CSP.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Performance of the algorithms for different motor imagery combinations involving the right hand. (<b>a</b>) Right-hand versus left-hand motor imagery classification; (<b>b</b>) right-hand versus feet motor imagery classification; (<b>c</b>) right-hand versus tongue motor imagery classification.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Accuracy percentages and <span class="html-italic">p</span>-values for the testing of an improvement in performance over CSP when the right hand versus left hand movement imagination are discriminated. The results reveal that, in general and except in a few isolated cases, the null hypothesis that the other methods do not significantly improve the performance over CSP cannot be discarded. (<b>a</b>) Average accuracy obtained by the algorithms for each subject; (<b>b</b>) <span class="html-italic">p</span>-values of the <span class="html-italic">t</span>-tests that compare whether the performance of the alternative algorithms is significantly better than the one obtained by CSP. The horizontal dashed line represents the threshold level of significance of 5%.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Histogram of the values of the regularization parameter in the Sub-LD algorithm that have been chosen by cross-validation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Histogram of the hyper-parameters of the DivCSP algorithm selected by cross-validation. (<b>a</b>) Case with <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mi>β</mi> <mo>∈</mo> <mo>[</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>0.5</mn> <mo>]</mo> </mrow> </semantics> </math> and <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mi>ϕ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> </mrow> </semantics> </math>; (<b>b</b>) case with <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mi>β</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.5</mn> </mrow> </semantics> </math> and <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mi>ϕ</mi> <mo>∈</mo> <mo>[</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>0.5</mn> <mo>]</mo> </mrow> </semantics> </math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Comparison of the accuracy percentages obtained by each of the considered algorithms with respect to the percentage of mismatched labels in the training set. This experiment illustrates deterioration of the performance of the algorithms with respect to the increase of the percentage of randomly switched labels of the motor imagery movements.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Accuracy percentages versus the percentage of training trials with outliers in a synthetic classification experiment.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop