[go: up one dir, main page]

 
 

Prostate Cancer: from Molecular Imaging to Immunological and Target Therapies II

A special issue of Biomedicines (ISSN 2227-9059). This special issue belongs to the section "Cancer Biology and Oncology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 May 2022) | Viewed by 19207

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
Interests: molecular imaging; oncology; PET/CT; neurodegenerative disorders; neuroimaging; Alzheimer's disease; brain tumors; pediatric tumors
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Prostate cancer (PC) represents a crucial public health issue in Western countries. For many years, chemotherapy with taxanes has represented the only option for PC progressing in spite of castrate levels of testosterone, a severe clinical condition termed metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The management of mCRPC has been deeply modified by the introduction of several novel treatments, such as second-generation antiandrogens, PARP (poly(ADP)-ribose polymerase) inhibitors, and cellular immunotherapy. Furthermore, targeted radionuclide therapy with the bone-seeking agent radium-223 dichloride (Xofigo) has proved useful for improving survival in mCRPC with bone metastases. More recently, prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) has emerged as an attractive biomarker both for positron emission tomography (PET) imaging and targeted radionuclide therapy, in the perspective of combining diagnosis and treatment in a unique approach (i.e., “theranostics”). The aforementioned emerging therapeutic options call for an unmet need of imaging/molecular biomarkers, suitable for accurate pre-treatment patient selection and outcome prediction.

The aim of this Special Issue is to solicit original research or review articles highlighting the potential usefulness of different molecular probes (18F/11C-choline, 18F-fluciclovine, PSMA-targeting agents, 18F-fluoride, PARP-inhibitors’ analogues) in order to define customized therapeutic pathways in patients affected by PC.

Dr. Agostino Chiaravalloti
Dr. Luca Filippi
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Biomedicines is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • prostate cancer
  • molecular imaging
  • targeted therapy
  • PSMA
  • theranostics

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (6 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Editorial

Jump to: Research, Review

3 pages, 169 KiB  
Editorial
Prostate Cancer: From Molecular Imaging to Immunological and Target Therapies
by Luca Filippi and Agostino Chiaravalloti
Biomedicines 2023, 11(4), 1176; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11041176 - 14 Apr 2023
Viewed by 1348
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most common malignancies and a leading cause of cancer-related deaths, affecting a million people worldwide with a particularly high burden in countries with a low human development index [...] Full article

Research

Jump to: Editorial, Review

12 pages, 1958 KiB  
Article
The Role of [18F]F-Choline PET/CT in the Initial Management and Outcome Prediction of Prostate Cancer: A Real-World Experience from a Multidisciplinary Approach
by Luca Urso, Giovanni Christian Rocca, Francesca Borgia, Federica Lancia, Antonio Malorgio, Mauro Gagliano, Mauro Zanetto, Licia Uccelli, Corrado Cittanti, Carmelo Ippolito, Laura Evangelista and Mirco Bartolomei
Biomedicines 2022, 10(10), 2463; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10102463 - 1 Oct 2022
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 2889
Abstract
Initial staging of prostate cancer (PCa) is usually performed with conventional imaging (CI), involving computed tomography (CT) and bone scanning (BS). The aim of this study was to analyze the role of [18F]F-choline positron emission tomography (PET)/CT in the initial management [...] Read more.
Initial staging of prostate cancer (PCa) is usually performed with conventional imaging (CI), involving computed tomography (CT) and bone scanning (BS). The aim of this study was to analyze the role of [18F]F-choline positron emission tomography (PET)/CT in the initial management and outcome prediction of PCa patients by analyzing data from a multidisciplinary approach. We retrospectively analyzed 82 patients who were discussed by the uro-oncology board of the University Hospital of Ferrara for primary staging newly diagnosed PCa (median age 72 (56–86) years; median baseline prostate specific antigen (PSA) equal to 8.73 ng/mL). Patients were divided into three groups based on the imaging performed: group A = only CI; group B = CI + [18F]F-choline PET/CT; group C = only [18F]F-choline PET/CT. All data on imaging findings, therapy decisions and patient outcomes were retrieved from hospital information systems. Moreover, we performed a sub-analysis of semiquantitative parameters extracted from [18F]F-choline PET/CT to search any correlation with patient outcomes. The number of patients included in each group was 35, 35 and 12, respectively. Patients with higher values of initial PSA were subjected to CI + PET/CT (p = 0.005). Moreover, the use of [18F]F-choline PET/CT was more frequent in patients with higher Gleason score (GS) or ISUP grade (p = 0.013). The type of treatment performed (surgery n = 33; radiation therapy n = 22; surveillance n = 6; multimodality therapy n = 6; systemic therapy n = 13; not available n = 2) did not show any relationship with the modality adopted to stage the disease. [18F]F-choline PET/CT induced a change of planned therapy in 5/35 patients in group B (14.3%). Moreover, patients investigated with [18F]F-choline PET/CT alone demonstrated longer biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival (30.8 months) in comparison to patients of groups A and B (15.5 and 23.5 months, respectively, p = 0.006), probably due to a more accurate selection of primary treatment. Finally, total lesion choline kinase activity (TLCKA) of the primary lesion, calculated by multiplying metabolic tumor volume and mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean), was able to more effectively discriminate patients who had recurrence after therapy compared to those without (p = 0.03). In our real-world experience [18F]F-choline PET/CT as a tool for the initial management of PCa had a relevant impact in terms of therapy selection and was associated with longer BCR-free survival. Moreover, TLCKA of the primary lesion looks a promising parameter for predicting recurrence after curative therapy. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>A</b>,<b>B</b> transaxial fused images) manual workflow of [<sup>18</sup>F]F-choline PET/CT imaging elaboration. A circular ROI was drawn on prostate cancer ((<b>A</b>), white arrow) and lymph node metastasis ((<b>B</b>), white arrow) and automatically adapted into a 3-dimensional VOI, from which the software directly extracted semiquantitative and volumetric (threshold = 40%) parameters.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>A</b>,<b>B</b>) A 71-year-old man with locally advanced PCa (Gleason score 9, 4 + 5 and a serum PSA value of 36 ng/mL) underwent [<sup>18</sup>F]F-choline PET/CT ((<b>A</b>) transaxial fused image; (<b>B</b>) CT image) for the initial staging of the disease. The PET/CT image shows a pathological uptake corresponding to a small left internal iliac lymph node (red arrow). Lymph node metastasis was not detected in CT staging, as its size (0.7 × 0.6 mm) was below the significance criteria. (<b>C</b>,<b>D</b>) A 68 year-old-man with PCa (G.S 6, 3 + 3; PSA value of 71.29 ng/mL) was imaged with [<sup>18</sup>F]F-choline PET/CT staging ((<b>C</b>) transaxial fused image; (<b>D</b>) CT image), with evidence of a focal uptake corresponding to a bone lesion at the third right rib (blue arrow), which could not be detected by CT due to the normal bone structure.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 2487 KiB  
Article
Baseline Imaging Derived Predictive Factors of Response Following [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 Therapy in Salvage Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Lesion- and Patient-Based Analysis
by Esmée C. A. van der Sar, Adinda J. S. Kühr, Sander C. Ebbers, Andrew M. Henderson, Bart de Keizer, Marnix G. E. H. Lam and Arthur J. A. T. Braat
Biomedicines 2022, 10(7), 1575; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10071575 - 1 Jul 2022
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 3338
Abstract
Earlier studies have mostly identified pre-therapeutic clinical and laboratory parameters for the prediction of treatment response to [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer patients (mCRPC). The current study investigated whether imaging-derived factors on baseline [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT can potentially [...] Read more.
Earlier studies have mostly identified pre-therapeutic clinical and laboratory parameters for the prediction of treatment response to [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer patients (mCRPC). The current study investigated whether imaging-derived factors on baseline [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT can potentially predict the response after two cycles of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 treatment, in a lesion- and patient-based analysis in men with mCRPC. Included patients had histologically proven mCRPC and a [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT before and after two cycles of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 treatment. The imaging-based response was evaluated on lesion-level (standardized uptake value (SUV) reduction) and patient-level (total lesion PSMA (TL-PSMA) reduction). In the lesion-level analysis, a clear relationship was found between SUVpeak/max and the imaging-based response to [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT (most avid lesion SUVpeak/max ≥ 30% reduction) (p < 0.001), with no significant difference in cut-off values between different sites of metastases (i.e., lymph node, bone or visceral metastasis). In patient-level analysis, baseline PSA and SUVpeak values of most avid metastasis were significantly associated with imaging-based response (TL-PSMA ≥ 30% reduction) (p = 0.019 and p = 0.015). In pre-treatment with [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT, a clear accumulation-response relationship in lesion-level was found for SUVpeak/max in men with mCRPC receiving two cycles of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 treatment. The SUVpeak of the most avid lesion was the only image-derived factor predictive of the imaging-based response at the patient-level. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Flow-chart of the retrospective included patients.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Example of two patients: responder and non-responder after two cycles of [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 treatment. (<b>a</b>): Responder (TL-PSMA reduction 95.01%, PSA-reduction: 99.5%): 78-year-old men with a Gleason score of nine, a ECOG performance score zero and a SUV<sub>peak</sub> of the most avid lesion of 17.7. Activity first cycle [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-617: 6.3 GBq, activity second cycle [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-617: 6.3 GBq. TL-PSMA pre-treatment: 1961.02 SUV<sub>lbm,peak</sub>*cm<sup>3</sup>, TL-PSMA post-treatment: 97.79 SUV<sub>lbm,peak</sub>*cm<sup>3</sup>. (<b>b</b>): Non-responder (TL-PSMA increase: 750.77%, PSA-increase: 566.7%): 69-year-old men with a Gleason score of eight, a ECOG performance score of two and a SUV<sub>peak</sub> of the most avid lesion of 9.48. Activity first cycle [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-617: 6.2 GBq, activity second cycle [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-617: 6.2GBq. TL-PSMA pre-treatment: 260.58 SUV<sub>lbm,peak</sub>*cm<sup>3</sup>, TL-PSMA post-treatment: 2216.94 SUV<sub>lbm,peak</sub>*cm<sup>3</sup>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Receiver Operating Characteristics-curves for the predicting of imaging-based response including bootstrap-corrected c-statistic of the three separately tested models in logistic regression. (<b>a</b>): SUV<sub>peak</sub> all measured lesions together, (<b>b</b>): SUV<sub>peak</sub> lymph node metastases, (<b>c</b>): SUV<sub>peak</sub> bone metastases. Legend: AUC = Area under the curve, SUV = Standardized uptake value.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>SUV<sub>peak</sub> values per response category on the tumor-level. Legend: iCR = Imaging complete response, iPD = Imaging progression disease, iPR = Imaging partial response, iSD = Imaging stable disease, SUV = Standardized uptake value.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Relationship between metastasis type, response, and accumulation. Numbers in the plot indicate the number of tumors in the corresponding group. Legend: iCR = Imaging complete response, iPD = Imaging progression disease, iPR = Imaging partial response, iSD = Imaging stable disease, SUV = Standardized uptake value.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Kaplan–Meier curves showing the significant survival probability, expressed as a percentage, following the first cycle of [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 treatment. (<b>a</b>): ECOG performance score, (<b>b</b>): Primary prostate in situ yes or no, (<b>c</b>): Imaging-based response (≥30 TL-PSMA reduction) yes or no, (<b>d</b>): Biochemical response (&gt;50% PSA reduction) yes or no. Legend: ECOG = Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.</p>
Full article ">
9 pages, 1066 KiB  
Article
68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT Initial Staging in Black and White South African Males with ISUP Grade Group 1 and 2 Prostate Adenocarcinoma
by Letjie C. Maserumule, Kgomotso M. G. Mokoala, Christophe van de Wiele, Gbenga Popoola, Khanyisile N. Hlongwa, Honest Ndlovu, Alex Maes, Mariza Vorster and Mike M. Sathekge
Biomedicines 2022, 10(4), 882; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10040882 - 12 Apr 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1994
Abstract
Prostate adenocarcinoma (PCa) is a leading cause of mortality. Black males with high-risk PCa have a poorer prognosis compared to white males. Patients with International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Grade Group (GG) 1 and 2 PCa have little potential for metastases post [...] Read more.
Prostate adenocarcinoma (PCa) is a leading cause of mortality. Black males with high-risk PCa have a poorer prognosis compared to white males. Patients with International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Grade Group (GG) 1 and 2 PCa have little potential for metastases post radical prostatectomy. 68Gallium prostate specific membrane antigen (68Ga-PSMA) PET/CT imaging for metastatic PCa is superior to conventional imaging in staging high-risk PCa. No strong evidence is available to support imaging low-risk patients. We aimed to evaluate the value of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in black and white South African (BSA and WSA) males with GG1 and 2 PCa at initial staging. We evaluated 25 WSA and 123 BSA males. The image findings were correlated with prostate specific antigen (PSA). PSA levels significantly correlated with both primary tumor and whole-body PSMA-tumor volume (PSMA-TV) and were higher in BSA males. No differences were noted in the occurrence of metastases; however, PSA, seminal vesicle invasion and black race predicted metastases. Our findings suggest higher PSMA expression and tumor burden in BSA with histologically low-risk PCa, and future research with immunohistochemistry evaluation will be essential to confirm these findings. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Scatterplot showing the correlation between baseline PSA (ug/L) levels and whole-body PSMA-TV (WBPSMATV).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Comparison of primary tumor PSMA-TV in WSA (<b>A</b>) and BSA (<b>B</b>) for two patients with GG 1 disease in maximum projection image, PET only and fused PET/CT. (<b>A</b>) corresponds to a 61-year-old WSA with PSA 73.31 ug/L. SUVmax–3.42, TL-PSMA–0.90, PSMA-TV of 0.29. (<b>B</b>) corresponds to a 60-year-old BSA with PSA of 22 ug/L. SUVmax–6.85, TL-PSMA–17.3, PSMA-TV-4.89.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Comparison of whole-body (WB) PSMA-TV in WSA (<b>A</b>) and BSA (<b>B</b>) for two patients with GG 2 disease. Left: maximum intensity projection image; middle column: PET and fused PET/CT of prostate; right column: PET and fused PET/CT metastases. (<b>A</b>) 58 year-old WSA with PSA 59 ug/L, with pelvic nodal metastases (red arrow). Bilateral ureteric tracer excretion seen, WBPSMA-TV-45. (<b>B</b>) 57-year-old BSA with PSA of 30 ug/L demonstrating pelvic skeletal metastases, WBPSMA-TV–58.</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 2354 KiB  
Article
Detection Rate and Clinical Impact of PET/CT with 18F-FACBC in Patients with Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective Bicentric Study
by Luca Filippi, Oreste Bagni, Carmelo Crisafulli, Ivan Cerio, Gabriele Brunotti, Agostino Chiaravalloti, Orazio Schillaci and Franca Dore
Biomedicines 2022, 10(1), 177; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10010177 - 15 Jan 2022
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 4430
Abstract
Our aim was to assess the detection rate (DR) of positron emission computed tomography (PET/CT) with anti-1-amino-3-[18F]-flurocyclobutane-1-carboxylic acid (18F-FACBC) in patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR) from prostate cancer (PC). As a secondary endpoint, we evaluated 18F-FACBC PET/CT’s impact [...] Read more.
Our aim was to assess the detection rate (DR) of positron emission computed tomography (PET/CT) with anti-1-amino-3-[18F]-flurocyclobutane-1-carboxylic acid (18F-FACBC) in patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR) from prostate cancer (PC). As a secondary endpoint, we evaluated 18F-FACBC PET/CT’s impact on patients management. Clinical records of 81 patients submitted to 18F-FACBC PET/CT due to PC BCR in two Italian Nuclear Medicine Units were retrospectively assessed. DR was gauged in the whole cohort and stratifying patients by discrete intervals of PSA levels. PET/CT’s impact on clinical management was scored as (1) major if it entailed an intermodality change (e.g., from systemic to loco-regional therapy); (2) minor if it led to an intramodality change (e.g., modified radiotherapy field). PET/CT’s DR resulted in 76.9% in the whole cohort, with a positive predictive value of 96.7%. Stratified by PSA quartile intervals, PET/CT’s DR was 66.7%, 71.4%, 78.9% and 90% for PSA 0.2–0.57 ng/mL, 0.58–0.99 ng/mL, 1–1.5 ng/mL and >1.5 ng/mL without significant difference among groups (p = 0.81). The most common sites of relapse were prostate bed and pelvic lymph nodes (59.3%). PET/CT impacted on clinical management in 33/81 cases (40.7%), leading to a major change in 30 subjects (90.9%). 18F-FACBC PET/CT localized recurrence in patients with BCR, with meaningful DR also at low PSA levels and significantly impacted on clinical management. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Diagnostic flow-chart for patient selection.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Graphic illustration of PET/CT detection rate in enrolled patients, stratified into 4 groups according to discrete PSA intervals.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>ROC curve analysis shows the accuracy of the PSA level (<b>A</b>) and PSA doubling time (<b>B</b>), measured prior to <sup>18</sup>F-FACBC PET/CT scan, for predicting positive results.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Box plot graph showing the PSA level distribution in patients with positive (<b>A</b>) and negative (<b>B</b>) <sup>18</sup>F-FABC PET/CT scans, 2-tailed <span class="html-italic">t</span>-test results were significant at <span class="html-italic">p</span> = 0.005. The 2 hot dots in panel A represent 2 subjects with PSA value strongly out of range (i.e., 5 and 7.8 ng/mL, respectively).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Graph illustration of the therapeutic changes determined by <sup>18</sup>F-FACBC PET/CT in patients classified according to modified PROMISE reading approach.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>A 72-year-old patient 6 years post prostatectomy for pT3b pN0 ISUP Grade Group 4 prostate adenocarcinoma, presenting biochemical recurrence with PSA level prior to PET/CT of 0.38 ng/mL. (<b>A</b>) MIP image showing an area of increased tracer incorporation in the right pelvis (arrow). Fused corresponding PET/CT axial (<b>B</b>, arrow) and coronal (<b>C</b>, arrow) slices depicting a round-shaped right obturator lymph node, characterized by <sup>18</sup>F-FACBC pathological uptake, with a maximum diameter of 12 mm and a maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of 7.7, superior to bone marrow SUVmean (3.1). Final diagnosis was T0N1M0 according to PROMISE. Intended therapy prior to PET/CT was androgen deprivation therapy, after the collegial discussion of <sup>18</sup>F-FACBC PET/CT’s results, the patient was submitted to stereotactic radiotherapy with PSA response.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>A 74-year-old patient 5 years post radiotherapy for cT2b ISUP Grade Group 4 prostate adenocarcinoma, presenting biochemical recurrence with PSA level prior to PET/CT of 1.25 ng/mL. (<b>A</b>) MIP image showing an area of increased tracer incorporation in the left umbilical region (arrow). Fused corresponding PET/CT axial (<b>B</b>, arrow) and coronal (<b>C</b>, arrow) slices depicting a round-shaped para-aortic lymph node, located below the left kidney artery, characterized by <sup>18</sup>F-FACBC pathological uptake, with a maximum diameter of 14 mm and a maximum standardized uptake value (SUV<sub>max</sub>) of 10.1, superior to bone marrow SUV<sub>mean</sub> (3.3). Final diagnosis was T0N0M1a according to PROMISE. Intended therapy prior to PET/CT was androgen deprivation therapy, after the collegial discussion of <sup>18</sup>F-FACBC PET/CT’s results, the patient was submitted to stereotactic radiotherapy on the abdominal node with PSA response.</p>
Full article ">

Review

Jump to: Editorial, Research

23 pages, 1407 KiB  
Review
Pharmacological Optimization of PSMA-Based Radioligand Therapy
by Suzanne van der Gaag, Imke H. Bartelink, André N. Vis, George L. Burchell, Daniela E. Oprea-Lager and Harry Hendrikse
Biomedicines 2022, 10(12), 3020; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10123020 - 23 Nov 2022
Cited by 16 | Viewed by 4092
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common malignancy in men of middle and older age. The standard treatment strategy for PCa ranges from active surveillance in low-grade, localized PCa to radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, hormonal treatment and chemotherapy. Recently, the use [...] Read more.
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common malignancy in men of middle and older age. The standard treatment strategy for PCa ranges from active surveillance in low-grade, localized PCa to radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, hormonal treatment and chemotherapy. Recently, the use of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radioligand therapy (RLT) for metastatic castration-resistant PCa has been approved. PSMA is predominantly, but not exclusively, expressed on PCa cells. Because of its high expression in PCa, PSMA is a promising target for diagnostics and therapy. To understand the currently used RLT, knowledge about pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of the PSMA ligand and the PSMA protein itself is crucial. PK and PD properties of the ligand and its target determine the duration and extent of the effect. Knowledge on the concentration–time profile, the target affinity and target abundance may help to predict the effect of RLT. Increased specific binding of radioligands to PSMA on PCa cells may be associated with better treatment response, where nonspecific binding may increase the risk of toxicity in healthy organs. Optimization of the radioligand, as well as synergistic effects of concomitant agents and an improved dosing strategy, may lead to more individualized treatment and better overall survival. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic overview of the structure of a PSMA receptor. DOTA = 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid; PSMA = prostate-specific membrane antigen.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) Physiological pathway of androgens and regulation of PSMA receptors. DHT coupled to the androgen receptor has an inhibiting effect on the production of PSMA receptors; (<b>b</b>) Androgen blockage, for example, by enzalutamide, causes an upregulation of the PSMA receptor due to the loss of the inhibiting effect. DHT = dihydrotestosterone; AR = androgen receptor; PSMA = prostate-specific membrane antigen.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Simplified crosstalk between androgen receptor pathway and PI3K-AKT pathway. DHT = dihydrotestosterone; AR = androgen receptor; PI3K = phosphoinositide-3-kinase; PIP2 = phosphatidylinositol(3,4,5)-biphosphate; PIP3 = phosphatidylinositol(3,4,5)-triphosphate; PTEN = phosphatase and tensin homolog; AKT = protein kinase B; mTOR = mammalian target of rapamycin.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop