CSR For Logistics Companies

Sustainability trends reshaping global logistics 🌍 Logistics is at the center of global sustainability. From emissions to resource use, supply chains influence the environmental impact of nearly every industry. As regulations tighten and expectations rise, logistics must evolve to support a low-carbon, circular economy. The latest DHL Logistics Trend Radar 7.0 highlights how sustainability is shaping the future of supply chains. The report underscores the urgency of decarbonization, circularity, and ESG-driven operations, pushing logistics to reduce its environmental footprint. Decarbonization remains a top priority. Supply chains account for 60% of global emissions, making low-carbon transport, sustainable fuels, and emissions tracking essential. Companies are now under growing pressure to disclose and reduce their carbon footprint. Circularity is becoming more embedded in logistics. Reverse logistics, recommerce, and circular packaging are shifting supply chains away from wasteful, linear models. As regulations around waste and product lifecycles evolve, logistics must facilitate more efficient resource flows. Sustainable urban logistics is also gaining traction. With more cities introducing zero-emission zones and last-mile regulations, logistics must adapt through electric fleets, cargo bikes, and optimized urban distribution models to minimize congestion and emissions. ESG-driven supply chains are setting new standards. From ethical sourcing to biodiversity protection, logistics plays a crucial role in ensuring more transparent, responsible, and resilient operations across industries. Sustainability is no longer an option—it’s an expectation. These trends reflect a shift in how businesses approach logistics. Companies that integrate sustainability into their supply chains today will not only meet compliance demands but also gain a competitive edge in a changing global economy. #sustainability #sustainable #business #esg #climatechange

In the last 24 months we identified 300+ new legislations related to climate change and over 10% of them have elements assessing green claims. But what are the steps for a business to comply with the upcoming legislation in the EU? To comply with the EU's greenwashing regulations and avoid misleading consumers, companies should take the following steps: 1. Review and audit all marketing materials and environmental claims: Businesses should conduct a thorough review of their marketing materials and environmental claims to ensure they align with the regulations. This may involve consulting with legal and sustainability experts to identify potential areas of concern. 2. Substantiate environmental claims: Companies must provide evidence to support their environmental claims, using credible and verifiable sources. This may include scientific studies, third-party certifications, or government data. Companies should be prepared to disclose this information if required by the regulations. 3. Rigorous carbon accounting:  To prove one’s environmental impact, you will have to back it up with data. Companies must diverge from industry averages when calculating the footprint of a product or service. It is important to leverage primary activity data with already existing proof, for example, your scope 1 and 2 can be easily tracked through energy invoices, bills and such. Then, the golden share still is represented from scope 3 emissions, but it is important for companies to start backing up their claims with proof and data. 4. Implement standardised environmental labels: The EU Commission promotes using standardised environmental labels, such as the EU Ecolabel, to provide consumers with reliable information about a product's environmental performance. Companies should consider adopting these labels where applicable to demonstrate compliance with the regulations. 5. Train employees on greenwashing and regulations: Companies should provide training to their employees on greenwashing to ensure that all relevant personnel understand the implications of these regulations and can identify potential compliance issues. 6. Continuously monitor and update marketing materials: Businesses should regularly review and update their marketing materials and environmental claims to ensure ongoing compliance with regulations. This may involve keeping abreast of new developments in sustainability research, as well as changes to the regulatory environment. To understand further how the EU greenwashing regulations will impact your business, have a read here: https://lnkd.in/egrfuk6h To understand green-related terms, have a read here: https://lnkd.in/eznWaTZ5 #greenwashing #sustainability #co2 #eu #co2 #esg #compliance

SUPPLIER QUALITY AUDIT CHECKLIST: 1.Quality Management System 1.Verify if the supplier is certified to ISO 9001 or IATF 16949. 2.Check for the presence of a documented Quality Policy and measurable objectives. 3.Confirm that roles, responsibilities, and authorities are clearly defined. 4.Ensure quality manuals and procedures are up-to-date and controlled. 2.Incoming Material Control 1.Review procedures for inspecting incoming materials. 2.Check whether Certificates of Conformance (CoC) or test reports are verified. 3.Confirm that non-conforming incoming materials are recorded and managed appropriately. 3.Process Control 1.Verify that work instructions are available and followed at each workstation. 2.Identify whether critical processes are controlled with defined parameters. 3.Check if in-process inspection is conducted systematically. 4.Look for the use of Statistical Process Control (SPC) tools like control charts or histograms for key operations. 4.Final Inspection and Testing 1.Ensure there is a procedure for final product inspection and testing. 2.Confirm that inspection records are maintained. 3.Check if outgoing products are verified against customer requirements. 4.Verify traceability systems for finished goods. 5.Equipment Calibration and Maintenance 1.Review the calibration schedule for measuring instruments. 2.Check if all gauges and instruments are calibrated with valid certificates. 3.Ensure preventive maintenance plans are in place and followed. 6.Non-Conformance and Corrective Action 1.Examine how internal and customer-related non-conformances are handled. 2.Check if root cause analysis methods like 5Why or Fishbone diagrams are used. 3.Ensure corrective and preventive actions are tracked to closure with effectiveness verification. 7.Document and Record Control 1.Confirm that records are retained as per defined retention policies. 2.Check whether document revisions are controlled and updated systematically. 8.Supplier/Sub-supplier Management 1.Verify if sub-suppliers are evaluated periodically. 2.Ensure the supplier has defined quality expectations and requirements for their own suppliers. 9.Training and Competency 1.Check whether employees are trained and competent for their assigned tasks. 2.Ensure training records are maintained and effectiveness is evaluated. 10.Continuous Improvement 1.Look for evidence of continuous improvement initiatives such as Kaizen, 5S, or Six Sigma. 2.Check whether improvement goals are set, monitored, and reviewed regularly. 11.Environment, Health & Safety (EHS) 1.Ensure that safety measures, signage, and personal protective equipment (PPE) are available and used. 2.Verify the implementation of 5S principles in the workplace. 3.Check for compliance with environmental and legal regulations. 12.Customer Satisfaction and Support 1.Review how customer feedback and complaints are collected and analyzed. 2.Check whether timely and effective actions are taken in response to customer issues.

More than half of Salesforce’s most strategic suppliers — based on the amount the $38 billion software company spends on their goods and services — have agreed to cut their greenhouse gas emissions as part of binding provisions in their contracts. Those clauses are part of the Salesforce Sustainability Exhibit, introduced four years ago in May 2021 as an amendment to the company’s standard contact. Many large companies actively encourage suppliers to reduce emissions through science-based targets, and some offer educational resources and technical assistance to help. Salesforce remains unique in codifying those commitments as part of its procurement process, although customer service software company Zendesk — a Salesforce supplier — was inspired enough by the approach to introduce a similar set of contract clauses in November 2024. Best practices for companies interested in shaping similar programs: ➡️ Get procurement teams involved. They can help prioritize engagement and signal which suppliers might find new requirements difficult to meet. ➡️ Provide technical support. Many companies, especially smaller ones, will need an education on the concept of net zero. ➡️ Offer options. Allow suppliers to choose the emissions reduction path that makes the most sense for their business rather than dictating a one-size-fits all approach.  ➡️ Look for ways to support supplier investments. For example, a corporation could motivate supplier investments in renewable energy or lower-emissions materials through better procurement terms. Lessons from Salesforce’s unique contracting process: https://lnkd.in/eHZ7qGvm Cooper Wechkin Louisa McGuirk Serena Ingre Emily Damon Amy Garber

What's the best low-carbon way to power vehicles? A groundbreaking study in Joule examines the potential of green hydrogen to revolutionize transportation across ground, air, and marine sectors. While green hydrogen presents promise in the hard-to-abate areas of transportation, significant investments in infrastructure and technology are needed to realize its full potential. For passenger vehicles and most road transport, the most efficient use of power is electric vehicles, sometimes by a factor of 5-10x over other “emissions-free” methods including hydrogen! https://lnkd.in/e9GZjv3f #climate #energy #transportation #ev #renewables #emissions #innovation

Why is sustainable transport essential for greener cities and a better world? Global #transportation accounts for 25% of CO2 emissions worldwide. 91% of the energy used in motorised land, sea and air transport remains derived from #fossilfuels. Without major diversification towards clean and low-carbon transport, this figure is set to increase by nearly 60% by 2050. This is a particularly urgent issue in urban zones of the world. Our cities occupy just 3% of the Earth’s land, but drive between 60-80% of energy consumption and are responsible for a staggering 75% of global CO2 emissions. Cities are also the engines of the world’s economy and transport is vital to promote connectivity, trade and employment in our urban hubs. Therefore, we’re going to need to overhaul the way transport works and how our cities are built. We need transformation to make #sustainablemobility a reality.  The good news is that we do have solutions that exist, like #EVs and renewable aviation fuel. But we need to further accelerate change through a global concerted effort to support clean energy-powered mass transit systems, from electrifying our marine networks to railways. We also need to make our urban environments geared towards carbon-free travel with biking and walking lanes.  All of these actions will require not only new innovations, nature-positive city planning and financing, but indeed #collaboration across industries and borders to fully steer our societies towards a sustainable path.  As individuals, we can also take a stand by embracing car-free modes of transport and prioritise the planet in our daily travel decisions. Whether that means carpooling and opting for public transport to minimise traffic congestion, or choosing to join the #flygskam movement to go flight-free as much as possible. Every little bit counts.  As the United Nations has stated before: Sustainable transport is not an end in itself, but a means to achieve sustainable development. By making environmentally-friendly transportation widespread, accessible and affordable to all in cities and beyond, we move closer to reaching multiple goals—climate resilience, disaster mitigation, global net-zero, healthy breathable air, and inclusive human settlements. These interrelated targets are all laid out under #SDG9 and #SDG11.  #WorldSustainableTransportDay is celebrated annually to highlight the importance of green mobility, reminding us that we will only achieve our #GlobalGoals with clean transport systems. As UN Secretary-General António Guterres has emphasised, we have ‘no time to waste — let’s get moving’. With sustainable transport, we can pave the route towards a greener, healthier and more equitable world. #SDGs #SustainableTransport #WSTD

Living in a bustling urban environment, I often see firsthand the crucial role public transportation plays in people’s lives. For many of my patients, reliable and affordable public transit is essential for accessing healthcare, employment, and education. However, the current state of public transportation often exacerbates racial inequities rather than alleviates them. The recent report from the Center for New York City Affairs highlights the importance of public transportation subsidies in promoting racial equity. It’s a critical reminder that transportation policy is not just about moving people from point A to point B; it’s about providing equitable access to opportunities and services. Public transportation subsidies can significantly reduce the financial burden on low-income families. Many of my patients rely on public transit to get to their medical appointments. For those living paycheck to paycheck, even the cost of a bus or subway fare can be a barrier to receiving timely medical care. Subsidies can help mitigate these costs, ensuring that everyone can travel without undue financial strain. The report emphasizes that transportation policies need to consider the disproportionate impact on communities of color. Historically, these communities have been underserved by public transit, facing longer commutes and less reliable service. This not only affects their ability to get to work or school on time but also impacts their health and overall quality of life. Poor public transit access means missed appointments, delayed medical care, and increased stress, all of which contribute to health disparities. Implementing transportation subsidies is a step toward addressing these inequities. By making public transit more affordable and accessible, we can help ensure that marginalized communities are not left behind. This includes advocating for policies that provide discounted fares for low-income riders and improving the overall infrastructure of public transit to make it more reliable and efficient. As healthcare providers, we must recognize the broader social determinants that affect our patients' health. Reliable public transportation is one of these determinants. By supporting policies that promote equitable transit access, we can help improve the health and well-being of our communities. In conclusion, public transportation subsidies are a vital tool for promoting racial equity and improving access to essential services. By advocating for these policies, we can help ensure that everyone, regardless of their income or background, has the opportunity to live healthier, more fulfilling lives. Read more at: https://buff.ly/3MhxpDM #doctors #hospitals #healthcare #primarycare

🌍 Climate Change is Disrupting Global Supply Chains—What Does This Mean for Businesses? A recent study by Nora Pankratz, Ph.D. and Christoph Schiller, published in The Review of Financial Studies, offers a sobering insight into how climate hazards, particularly heat, are impacting firms and reshaping supply chains globally. 📉 Key Findings from the Study: 💥 Heat exposure reduces suppliers' operating income by 13.8% for a one-standard-deviation increase in heat days—and the effects ripple downstream, cutting customer operating income by 0.6% per quarter. 🚫 Firms are 7.4% more likely to terminate supplier relationships when heat exposure exceeds expectations, with this likelihood increasing for repeated or extreme deviations. 🌱 After terminating risky suppliers, businesses actively choose replacements with lower climate risk, reflecting proactive adaptation strategies. 🛠️ Customers also adjust by increasing inventories, cash holdings, and R&D investments to buffer against disruptions. 📊 A Broader Picture: The study highlights that firms in developing countries, often more vulnerable to climate change, are disproportionately impacted. Suppliers in countries with low climate adaptation readiness face higher termination risks, emphasizing the need for systemic solutions. 💡 My reflections: 🌩️ Climate risk isn’t just financial—it’s systemic. As businesses retreat from vulnerable regions, they risk exacerbating global inequality and isolating the areas most impacted by climate change. The true cost of climate risk might be the long-term instability created by economic withdrawal from these regions. 📉 Relying on short-term signals like observed heat days for long-term decisions is risky. Many firms act reactively, focusing on immediate climate disruptions rather than the underlying trajectory of climate projections. This approach could leave them exposed to larger, systemic risks in the future. 🤝 Resilience requires collaboration, not isolation. At a time when nations are becoming more protectionist and the dark clouds of trade wars loom large, businesses have a choice: sever ties with vulnerable suppliers or co-create resilience. The study reveals that many firms are opting to replace suppliers in climate-vulnerable regions, but imagine the alternative. What if businesses worked alongside suppliers to share technology, co-develop adaptive solutions, or finance localized climate resilience? This isn’t just a moral question—it’s a strategic one. Investing in mutual resilience could secure long-term supply-chain stability in an increasingly uncertain world. 🔗 https://lnkd.in/eBMv8GN9 How do you see businesses navigating these challenges? Can collaboration replace isolation as the default strategy for addressing climate risk? #ClimateChange #SupplyChain #Resilience #BusinessStrategy #Sustainability #PositiveScholarship

Did you know that transportation accounts for 27% of greenhouse gas emissions? (Source: EPA) Moreover, a staggering 60% of these emissions come from light-duty vehicles, such as cars and SUVs. (Source: Union of Concerned Scientists) 🚘🚙💨 As we navigate the climate crisis, our transportation choices have become a critical aspect of reducing our carbon footprint. But, are we making informed decisions? The answer, unfortunately, is no. ❌ So, what's the solution? Electric vehicles (EVs) are often touted as the answer, but the truth is more complex. While EVs produce zero tailpipe emissions, their production process and battery disposal have significant environmental costs. ✋ For instance, a study by the Swedish Environmental Research Institute found that EVs generate more greenhouse gas emissions during production than traditional gas-powered cars. (Source: Science Daily) Furthermore, the mining of lithium and other rare earth metals necessary for EV batteries has devastating environmental and social consequences.🤯 So, what can we do instead? 🤔 👉 Ditch the solo drive: Explore carpooling, public transport, or biking for your daily commute. According to studies, public transportation can reduce carbon emissions by 95% per passenger mile. 👉 Invest in active transportation: Advocate for cycle-friendly infrastructure and walkable cities to reduce reliance on fossil fuels. A study by the National Association of City Transportation Officials found that cities with strong cycle infrastructure see a significant reduction in greenhouse gas emissions. 👉 Support alternative modes of transportation: Consider hydrogen fuel cell vehicles, which produce only water vapor and heat as emissions. 🧠 Try These Mindset Shifts: ✅ From "convenience is key" to "sustainability is paramount" ✅ From "I'm just one person" to "collective action drives change" ✅ From "environmentalism is a personal choice" to "sustainability is a collective responsibility" As individuals, we have the power to make a difference. By making conscious transportation choices, we can reduce our carbon footprint and contribute to a more sustainable future. The time for change is now! 💯 Centre for Science and Environment, New Delhi #Sustainability #ClimateAction #Transportation #EcoFriendly

Here is a truth that is also a self-interested justification. When asked to assure that their #supplychain pays workers fairly, does not compel overtime, does not employ children and keeps fire exits unobstructed and clearly marked, many #fashion brands lament the impossibility of the challenge. After all, they note: (1) their supply chain is global, complex, multi tiered and unstable (as order volumes shift continuously); (2) suppliers often use subcontractors without seeking approval; (3) audits are temporal; and (4) records can be fudged….among other things. Thus, assurance is impossible. Even so, the EU was set to make these challenges the responsibility of brands via the CSDDD (Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive). According to the prior version of the CSDDD, brands would be responsible for due diligence to identify, assess and address negative impacts on human rights and environmental across their entire supply chain with the goal of preventing or mitigating adverse impacts. No more. The Omnibus restricts the responsibility for brands to only Tier 1 suppliers….which typically includes 10% to 20% of their total suppliers (while also spacing out the intervals of periodic risk assessments, removing mandatory rules for civil liability, and delaying implementation..) The inevitable result. Less disclosure and more human rights and environmental damage. What gets missed in this discussion is that the structure of fashion supply chains is a choice.  Brands choose to outsource to a complex, global, multi tiered supply chain to 1️⃣ lower asset intensity 2️⃣ drive down costs (of labor) 3️⃣ maintain flexibility (to move to lower wage countries) 4️⃣ skirt responsibility for human rights and environmental externalities and damage Decades ago, many apparel and footwear brands were also manufacturers with tight relationship with local suppliers. No more. Now, with production separated from consumption, and “making” outsourced to the Global South, with the cooperation of EU regulators, brands can continue to mostly wash their hands of their damage while continuing to earn outsized margins. Shivam Gusain Lutz Walter Oliver Scutt Auret Van Heerden Peter Ford Saqib Sohail Dr. Vidhura Ralapanawe Sanjana Pimoli Marie-Claire Daveu Kathleen Egan Kathleen Talbot Sarah Krasley Maxine Bédat Neeraj Narayan Liz Hershfield Leslie Johnston, M.Sc. Transformers Foundation Kim van der Weerd Philip Blake Andreas Rasche Alice Korngold Alice Marmion