Supplementary eye field

In an antisaccade task, subjects are instructed to inhibit a reflexive saccade towards a peripheral stimulus flash and to generate a saccade in the opposite direction. It has been shown recently that normal subjects will generate a high number of incorrect prosaccades in an antisaccade task if the fixation point is extinguished 200 ms before the stimulus appears and if a valid cue for the subsequent antisaccade is given during this gap period. In the present study we recorded cerebral event-related potentials from 19 scalp electrodes from normal subjects prior to correct and incorrect responses in a cued antisaccade task to investigate the neural processes associated with correct antisaccades and incorrect prosaccades in this task. Correct antisaccades and incorrect prosaccades were associated with a negative potential with a maximal amplitude around stimulus onset over the dorsomedial frontal cortex. This potential was higher prior to correct antisaccades than prior to incorrect prosaccades. The execution of a correct antisaccade was preceded by a shift of a negative potential from the parietal hemisphere contralateral to the visual stimulus towards the parietal hemisphere ipsilateral to the stimulus. These results support the view that the supplementary eye fields participate in the inhibition of incorrect saccades in a cued antisaccade task and show that the parietal cortex participates in generating a neural representation of the visual stimulus in the hemifield ipsilateral to the stimulus before generating a motor response.

Intelligent behaviour requires self-control based on the consequences of actions. The countermanding task is designed to study self-control; it requires subjects to withhold planned movements in response to an imperative stop signal, which they can do with varying success. In humans, the medial frontal cortex has been implicated in the supervisory control of action. In monkeys, the supplementary eye field

A potential application of studying eye movements with functional MRI (fMRI) is to examine patient populations with known eye movement dysfunction, but the reliability with which normal subjects demonstrate activity in specific brain regions has not been established. To date, fMRI studies of smooth-pursuit eye movements have used relatively small numbers of subjects and have been restricted to fixed-effects analyses. We extend these studies to whole brain imaging at 1.5 T, properly accounting for intersubject variation using random effects analysis. Smooth-pursuit eye movements elicited activation consistently in dorsal cortical eye fields and cerebellum. Subcortical activation was greatly attenuated, but not eliminated, with the random-effects second-level analysis. In addition, session-dependent changes in activation were greater in some regions than others and may indicate areas of brain, such as the supplementary eye fields, that are sensitive to attentional modulation of eye movements.

Background: Schizophrenia subjects demonstrate difficulties on tasks requiring saccadic inhibition, despite normal refixation saccade performance. Saccadic inhibition is ostensibly mediated via prefrontal cortex and associated cortical/subcortical circuitry. The current study tests ...

Subjects were trained on a pursuit task in which the target trajectory was predictable only on the horizontal axis. Half of them were sleep deprived on the first post-training night (n = 13). Three days later, functional magnetic resonance imaging revealed task-related increases in brain responses to the learned trajectory, as compared with a new trajectory. In the sleeping group (n = 12) as compared with the sleep-deprived group, subjects' performance was improved, and their brain activity was greater in the superior temporal sulcus (STS). Increased functional connectivity was observed between the STS and the cerebellum and between the supplementary eye field and the frontal eye field. These differences indicate sleep-related plastic changes during motor skill learning in areas involved in smooth pursuit eye movements.

Our knowledge of the cortical control of saccadic eye movements (saccades) in humans has recently progressed mainly thanks to lesion and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) studies, but also to functional imaging. It is now well-known that the frontal eye field is involved in the triggering of intentional saccades, the parietal eye field in that of reflexive saccades, the supplementary eye field (SEF) in the initiation of motor programs comprising saccades, the pre-SEF in learning of these programs, and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) in saccade inhibition, prediction and spatial working memory. Saccades may also be used as a convenient model of motricity to study general cognitive processes preparing movements, such as attention, spatial memory and motivation. Visuo-spatial attention appears to be controlled by a bilateral parieto-frontal network comprising different parts of the posterior parietal cortex and the frontal areas involved in saccade control, suggesting that visual attentional shifts and saccades are closely linked. Recently, our understanding of the cortical control of spatial memory has noticeably progressed by using the simple visuo-oculomotor model represented by the memory-guided saccade paradigm, in which a single saccade is made to the remembered position of a unique visual item presented a while before. TMS studies have determined that, after a brief stage of spatial integration in the posterior parietal cortex (inferior to 300 ms), short-term spatial memory (i.e. up to 15-20 s) is controlled by the DLPFC. Behavioral and lesion studies have shown that medium-term spatial memory (between 15-20 s and a few minutes) is specifically controlled by the parahippocampal cortex, before long-term memorization (i.e. after a few minutes) in the hippocampal formation. Lastly, it has been shown that the posterior part of the anterior cingulate cortex, called the cingulate eye field, is involved in motivation and the preparation of all intentional saccades, but not in reflexive saccades. These different but complementary study methods used in humans have thus contributed to a better understanding of both eye movement physiology and general cognitive processes preparing motricity as whole.

When different stimuli indicate where and when to make an eye movement, the brain areas involved in oculomotor control must selectively plan an eye movement to the stimulus that encodes the target position and also encode the information available from the timing cue. This could pose a challenge to the oculomotor system since the representation of the timing stimulus location in one brain area might be interpreted by downstream neurons as a competing motor plan. Evidence from diverse sources has suggested that the supplementary eye fields (SEF) play an important role in behavioral timing, so we recorded single unit activity from SEF to characterize how target and timing cues are encoded in this region. Two monkeys performed a variant of the memory-guided saccade task, in which a timing stimulus was presented at a randomly chosen eccentric location. Many spatially tuned SEF neurons only encoded the location of the target and not the timing stimulus, while several other SEF neurons en...

The superior sector of Brodmann area 6 (dorsal premotor cortex, PMd) of the macaque monkey consists of a rostral and a caudal architectonic area referred to as F7 and F2, respectively. The aim of this study was to define the origin of prefrontal and agranular cingulate afferents to F7 and F2, in the light of functional and hodological evidence showing that these areas do not appear to be functionally homogeneous. Different sectors of F7 and F2 were injected with neural tracers in seven monkeys and the retrograde labelling was qualitatively and quantitatively analysed. The dorsorostral part of F7 (supplementary eye field, F7-SEF) was found to be a target of strong afferents from the frontal eye field (FEF), from the dorsolateral prefrontal regions located dorsally (DLPFd) and ventrally (DLPFv) to the principal sulcus and from cingulate areas 24a, 24b and 24c. In contrast, the remaining part of F7 (F7-non SEF) is only a target of the strong afferents from DLPFd. Finally, the ventroros...