Several years of research on Cruser castles have allowed very reliable data to be recorded, resulted then in surveying large parts of the fortified buildings. The plan hasdealt with the span between the 10th and 13th century , with the...
moreSeveral years of research on Cruser castles have allowed very reliable data to be recorded, resulted then in surveying large parts of the fortified buildings. The plan hasdealt with the span between the 10th and 13th century , with the purpose of investigating thedevelopment of fortified structures, tracing the main steps of their evolution. A great opportunity for this project has come from the profitable co-operation with Prof. Vanniniat his excavations in Jordan. The collected data have allowed a wider comparative study interms of morphology, which is still under way. Our attention has been turned to therecognizability of masonries, which may derive from the European trition, questioningtherefore the common and followed theory that Arabic styles eventually influenced the new military solutions of 12th and 13th century . Sharing the idea that one cannot speak of ascattered Cruser phenomenon, without taking systematically into account what hhappened in Europe immediately before the Cruses, we have selected some interesting structures, founded in a frontier zone, which might have conclusively given some cluesabout the architectural development of medieval military settlements. Within the Jordanmission, the castles of Shoubak, Wu’ Ayra and Habis have been investigated as functionalunits, and some constant factors, in terms of building typologies and components, seem to have been focused on to estimating the territorial role of each fortified settlement. The building unit has been divided on the basis of standard topics; in principle, we have stressed on: access system, tower system, specific constructions like churches, and water supply system. The comparative study of dimensional analysis and geometric characteristics of those architectural frames has let some considerations arise to new perspectives still under way of verification. As regards the European experience, we have selected some buildings, which were well famous among their contemporaries themselves for their imposing construction and, at the same time, may have indicated models that were opted and evolved during the first Cruser epoch. Our particular interest has been turned to the scattered building pattern of the motta, which can well be assumed as original element of Middle Ages rather than tritional military structures of Classical Age, at least considering the building meaning, that is with regard to the erected architectural element rather than landscape morphological feature. Deep studies in this sense have turned to the European context, both in France and Italy: respectively at Gisors and San Marco Argentano; these two fortifications are upon a motta and characterised byan encircling chemise and a central keep. These three elements appear as connected witheach others and attest to the first stone-built construction during the early Normanexpansion, which forerun garrison’s attack and defence military solutions, that willthereafter have been evolved in the castles of the first Cruses. Their access systemspresent a sequence of towered structures, which have definitely met with success in theHoly Land. Moreover, the tower system indicates building technologies, which may beregarded as standard factors in terms of general dimension and masonry morphology. Asfar as this brief paper concern, in conclusion, some Jordanian sites may be put forward asfortified structures, but not castles stricto sensu, whilst the increase of their role may haveextended over the territory in different ways than assumed hitherto.