Evaluation of satellite Precipitation
0 Followers
Recent papers in Evaluation of satellite Precipitation
Intensity–duration–frequency (IDF) curves are widely used to quantify the probability of occurrence of rainfall extremes. The usual rain gauge-based approach provides accurate curves for a specific location, but uncertainties arise when... more
Intensity–duration–frequency (IDF) curves are widely used to quantify the probability of occurrence of rainfall extremes. The usual rain gauge-based approach provides accurate curves for a specific location, but uncertainties arise when ungauged regions are examined or catchment-scale information is required. Remote sensing rainfall records, e.g. from weather radars and satellites, are recently becoming available, providing high-resolution estimates at regional or even global scales; their uncertainty and implications on water resources applications urge to be investigated. This study compares IDF curves from radar and satellite (CMORPH) estimates over the eastern Mediterranean (covering Mediterranean, semiarid, and arid climates) and quantifies the uncertainty related to their limited record on varying climates. We show that radar identifies thicker-tailed distributions than satellite, in particular for short durations, and that the tail of the distributions depends on the spatial and temporal aggregation scales. The spatial correlation between radar IDF and satellite IDF is as high as 0.7 for 2–5-year return period and decreases with longer return periods, especially for short durations. The uncertainty related to the use of short records is important when the record length is comparable to the return period (∼50,∼100, and∼150% for Mediterranean, semiarid, and arid climates, respectively). The agreement between IDF curves derived from different sensors on Mediterranean and, to a good extent, semiarid climates, demonstrates the potential of remote sensing datasets and instils confidence on their quantitative use for ungauged areas of the Earth.
East Africa experienced in the 2001–11 time period some of the worst drought events to date, culminating in the high-impact drought of 2010/11. Long-term monitoring of precipitation is thus essential, and satellite-based precipitation... more
East Africa experienced in the 2001–11 time period some of the worst drought events to date, culminating in the high-impact drought of 2010/11. Long-term monitoring of precipitation is thus essential, and satellite-based precipitation products can help in coping with the relatively sparse rain gauge ground networks of this area of the world. However, the complex topography and the marked geographic variability of precipitation in the region make precipitation retrieval from satellites problematic and product validation and intercomparison necessary. Six state-of-the-art monthly satellite precipitation products over East Africa during the 2001–09 time frame are evaluated. Eight areas (clusters) are identified by investigating the precipitation seasonality through the Global Precipitation Climatology Centre (GPCC) climatological gauge data. Seasonality was fully reproduced by satellite data in each of the GPCC-identified clusters. Not surprisingly, complex terrain (mountain regions in particular) represents a challenge for satellite precipitation estimates, as demonstrated by the standard deviations of the six-product ensemble. A further confirmation comes from the comparison between satellite estimates and rain gauge measurements as a function of terrain elevation. The 3B42 product performs best, although the satellite–gauge comparative analysis was not completely independent since a few of the products include a rain gauge bias correction.
Intisari Curah hujan merupakan parameter meteorologi yang sangat berpengaruh dalam kehidupan. Saat ini, pengamatan secara in situ sangat kurang representatif untuk digunakan sebagai analisis karena jangkauannya yang sangat sempit sehingga... more
Intisari Curah hujan merupakan parameter meteorologi yang sangat berpengaruh dalam kehidupan. Saat ini, pengamatan secara in situ sangat kurang representatif untuk digunakan sebagai analisis karena jangkauannya yang sangat sempit sehingga memerlukan instrumen pendukung seperti satelit agar dapat memberikan gambaran yang lebih baik terkait distribusi hujan. Namun, data satelit juga belum tentu sepenuhnya benar karena resolusi dan kondisi dari setiap wilayah berbeda. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendapatkan nilai akurasi, bias, korelasi, root mean square error (RMSE), dan mean absolute error (MAE) data estimasi curah hujan GPM IMERG dengan data curah hujan pengamatan langsung. Penelitian ini dilakukkan di Surabaya dengan menggunakan data estimasi curah hujan GPM IMERG dan data curah hujan pengamatan langsung dari Stasiun Meteorologi Kelas I Juanda Surabaya selama tahun 2017 mewakili musim hujan, musim kemarau, dan periode transisi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa data curah hujan produk GPM IMERG memiliki korelasi yang sangat baik untuk memperkirakan akumulasi curah hujan bulanan. Sedangkan, untuk akumulasi harian, memiliki korelasi yang sangat rendah. Sementara itu untuk akumulasi sepuluh harian, data curah hujan produk satelit GPM IMERG memiliki korelasi yang baik terutama di periode musim hujan dan musim kemarau, akan tetapi memiliki korelasi yang rendah selama periode transisi dari musim hujan ke musim kemarau atau sebaliknya. Pada umumnya, produk ini sangat bagus dalam menentukan ada atau tidaknya hujan, tetapi performanya sangat rendah dalam menentukan besarnya intensitas curah hujan. Abstract Rainfall is one of the most influential meteorological parameter in life. At present, in situ observation is less representative in its use as an analysis tool because of its very narrow analytical range which necessitates the use of supporting instruments such as satellites. These instruments would provide a better picture with regards to rain distribution. However, satellite data is not necessarily correct entirely due to different resolutions and conditions of each region. This study aims to obtain the GPM IMERG Final Precipitation estimation data accuracy, bias, correlation, root mean square error (RMSE), and mean absolute error (MAE) values, by using direct observation rainfall data. This research was conducted in Surabaya by using GPM IMERG Final Precipitation rainfall estimation data and direct observation rainfall data from The Class I Meteorological Station in Juanda, Surabaya. This research was carried out in 2017 and includes the rainy season, dry season and the transition period of that year. The results showed that the GPM IMERG product rainfall data had a very good correlation to estimate the accumulation of monthly rainfall. Whereas, for daily accumulation, it has a very low correlation. Meanwhile for the accumulation of ten daily, rainfall data for GPM IMERG satellite products has a good correlation, especially in the rainy season and dry season, but has a low correlation during the transition period from the rainy season to the dry season or vice versa. In general, this product is very good in determining the presence or absence of rain, but its performance is very low in determining the amount of rainfall intensity.
This study uses an analytical hydrological framework to investigate the error propagation from satellite precipitation products to hydrological simulations. Specifically, the analytical formulation of the framework allows linking the... more
This study uses an analytical hydrological framework to investigate the error propagation from satellite precipitation products to hydrological simulations. Specifically, the analytical formulation of the framework allows linking the error in hydrograph properties (i.e., cumulative volume, centroid, and dispersion) to the space-time characteristics of error in satellite-precipitation, runoff generation, and routing. Main finding from this study are that (i) the error in spatial and temporal covariance between rainfall and runoff generation is not contributing significantly to the error in cumulative volume of flood events; (ii) errors in runoff generation and routing time are of equal importance in terms of the overall error in the arrival of flood event centroid; and (iii) errors in the variability of runoff generation time is the main contributor to the error in dispersion of flood event hydrograph. Furthermore, sensitivity tests show that errors in hydrograph properties are strongly correlated with errors in the space-time characteristics of precipitation, runoff generation and routing parameters estimated by the analytical framework.
Accurate quantitative precipitation estimation over mountainous basins is of great importance because of their susceptibility to hazards such as flash floods, shallow landslides, and debris flows, triggered by heavy precipitation events... more
Accurate quantitative precipitation estimation over mountainous basins is of great importance because of their susceptibility to hazards such as flash floods, shallow landslides, and debris flows, triggered by heavy precipitation events (HPEs). In situ observations over mountainous areas are limited, but currently available satellite precipitation products can potentially provide the precipitation estimation needed for hydrological applications. In this study, four widely used satellite-based precipitation products [Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) Multisatellite Precipitation Analysis (TMPA) 3B42, version 7 (3B42-V7), and in near?real time (3B42-RT); Climate Prediction Center (CPC) morphing technique (CMORPH); and Precipitation Estimation from Remotely Sensed Imagery Using Artificial Neural Networks (PERSIANN)] are evaluated with respect to their performance in capturing the properties of HPEs over different basin scales. Evaluation is carried out over the upper Adige River basin (eastern Italian Alps) for an 8-yr period (2003?10). Basin-averaged rainfall derived from a dense rain gauge network in the region is used as a reference. Satellite precipitation error analysis is performed for warm (May?August) and cold (September?December) season months as well as for different quantile ranges of basin-averaged precipitation accumulations. Three error metrics and a score system are introduced to quantify the performances of the various satellite products. Overall, no single precipitation product can be considered ideal for detecting and quantifying HPE. Results show better consistency between gauges and the two 3B42 products, particularly during warm season months that are associated with high-intensity convective events. All satellite products are shown to have a magnitude-dependent error ranging from overestimation at low precipitation regimes to underestimation at high precipitation accumulations; this effect is more pronounced in the CMORPH and PERSIANN products.