Please clck the following link. It directs you to Amazon.com for print and Kindle versions.
http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=dp_byline_sr_book_1?ie=UTF8&field-author=Wim+Borsboom&search-alias=books&text=Wim+Borsboom&sort=relevancerank
Abstract
This study investigates how and where the Western Alphabet acquired its haphazard and seemingly illogical order.
"Alphabet or Abracadabra?" details the writer's research into how (by copying) and when (before 3400 years ago) the Western Alphabet character sequence (abecedary) was modelled after a pre-Sanskrit character grid or abugida.
Inspired by the Devanāgarī abugida grid of characters, Borsboom discovered this when he forced the western alphabet's character sequence (the ABC or 'abecedary') into a similar tabular format. He started out by lining up the vowels in one column and fitting the following consonants sequentially into three adjacent columns and rows.
By comparing the resultant 4x5 column-and-row table (which contained most of the 26 western characters) with a then still hypothetical earlier and simpler form of a pre-Sanskrit abugida character grid, he was able to draw clear dependent links between the western alphabet's sequence of characters and that early form of a pre-Sanskrit nāgarī abugida.
There were some interesting anomalies though, the origins of which Borsboom was able to successfully trace, identify and explain.
Using those anomalies, he could even trace and date one particular early copy process to its (up to now) earliest occurrence, namely one 1400 BCE alphabet artifact found amongst the Ugarit cuneiform tablets.
This book illustrated tracing the origin of the anomalies back to three errors made by an ancient, most likely Near Eastern linguist, who, apparently, must have been on a 'study visit' in India.
When we compare the two sequential formats (the abugida and the abecedary) superficially, that is, before the tracing of errors and before the tabular reconstruction - a percentage of similarity of only 20% (4 out of 20 characters) was calculated.
However, after the error identifications and while taking into account the varying but close pronunciations of a number of comparable characters in side-by-side alphabet and abugida grids, and also while focusing on the placement of nearly all Western-Late Roman characters in their appropriate vowel, labial, guttural and dental columns (as will be shown in detail) an 85.00% match between them is arrived at.
This study also demonstrates how the aforementioned Ugarit abecedary from Syria (1400 -1200 BCE) is evidence that even before it was inscribed in cuneiform, that an even older 'West-of-India' style irregular alphabetic sequence was already in use, also based on a very early form of a Pre-Sanskrit Brāhmī abugida.