[go: up one dir, main page]

Academia.eduAcademia.edu
Heliyon 6 (2020) e05710 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Heliyon journal homepage: www.cell.com/heliyon Research article Does quality stimulate customer satisfaction where perceived value mediates and the usage of social media moderates? Md. Uzir Hossain Uzir a, *, Ishraq Jerin a, Hussam Al Halbusi b, Abu Bakar Abdul Hamid a, **, Ahmad Shaharudin Abdul Latiff a a b Putra Business School (PBS), Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), 43400, Seri Kembangan, Selangor, Malaysia Department of Management, College of Economics and Political Science, Sultan Qaboos University, P.O. Box 20, Al Khoud 123, Oman A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T Keywords: Customer satisfaction Social media usage Customer perceived value Quality of service SEM-AMOS Electronic home appliances Moderated mediation Bangladesh Tourism Information science Business Technology management Management Marketing Consumer attitude Research and development Psychology Customer is considered as the king in the world of business. The issue of customer satisfaction in electronics home appliances has received greater attention from academics and practitioners. In other words, customer satisfaction is a vital consideration in marketing. With the development of technology, new and innovative electronic home appliances are available in the market. Customers purchase and use the costly electronic home appliances where the satisfaction issue is an important concern. In Bangladesh, working families find the electronic home appliance very necessary. Companies offer state-of- the-art appliances for customers' household works. Therefore, the study intends to investigate the effect of product quality (PQ), quality of service (SQ) and perceived value on customer satisfaction (CS). In addition, this study also seeks this relationship shaped by customer's perceived value (CPV) as a key mechanism and interacted by social media usage. A total of 300 households were selected on a judgmental basis from Dhaka city in Bangladesh using a structured questionnaire. Collected data were CB-SEM (AMOS-v24) and SPSS. The findings showed PQ and SQ have positive effects on CS; SQ affects, but PQ does not affect CPV. CPV has a mixing mediating effect on SQ and CS relationship and PQ and CS relationship. Importantly, the positive impact of PQ, SQ and CPV is greater on customers who exhibit higher social media use. The conceptual framework was buttressed by EDT theory. The study contributed to contextual and theoretical knowledge in regards to home appliances. The practicing managers can collect an insight of customer satisfaction for their business. 1. Introduction Marshall, the famous and pioneer retailer, introduced the motto “Right or wrong, the customer is always right”. This motto indicates customer satisfaction. On the other hand, the concept caveat emptor (let the buyer beware) ignored customer attitude and their importance earlier stage in marketing (Jackson, 2017; McBain, 1944). Gradually some scholars identify the importance of customers. Fazal and Kanwal (2017) mentioned that customers are the nucleus of every successful company. Customer satisfaction is an aspect of psychological attitude or mood of customers, and a firm necessarily focuses this emotional state (Feng et al., 2019; O’Dwyer and Gilmore, 2018). Due to technological development, human life has become faster (McArthur, 2016), social needs and wants change, and the nature of their satisfaction alters. Similarly, marketing environment has changed (Kotler, 2017) and businesses are facing a tough challenge to ensure customer value (Shamsudin et al., 2018b) and their satisfaction (Hassan and Shamsudin, 2019). Electronic appliances, especially home appliances like air conditioner, coffee maker, crockeries, dishwasher, fan, fridge, geyser, iron, kitchen accessories, lighting bulbs, micro oven, oven, pressure cooker, rice cooker, sewing machine, television, washing machine, water heater, etc. have made human lives easier (McArthur, 2016). These home appliances or consumer durables last for a long period, and additional service or replacement are required (Lobo, 2016). One report from Statista (2020a) shows that total revenue for electronics home appliances in 2020 globally would be US$121.16 billion with user penetration of 13.60%. This report also forecasted that with the growth rate of 6.10%, the projected market volume will be US$153.51 billion in 2024 and new user penetration of 23.90%. Every user will spend an average amount to * Corresponding author. ** Corresponding author. E-mail addresses: mduzir.phd_mkt18@grad.putrabs.edu.my (Md.U.H. Uzir), abu.bakar@putrabs.edu.my (A.B.A. Hamid). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05710 Received 24 December 2019; Received in revised form 6 June 2020; Accepted 9 December 2020 2405-8440/© 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Md.U.H. Uzir et al. Heliyon 6 (2020) e05710 groups to purchase same or similar products from the same brand (Belwal and Amireh, 2018; Ghazzawi and Alharbi, 2019; Herhausen et al., 2019) and contribute to higher sales and business profit (Razak and Shamsudin, 2019; Uddin, 2013). According to Morra et al. (2018), social media generates an impact on their reviews about the brand, on their satisfaction level, and their perception. Before purchasing electronics items, a customer considers the reviews by others, word of mouth, family and friend’s recommendations and suggestions. By the grace of social media, customer can easily find valuable opinion, advice and reviews. In contrast, social media, in the absence of systematic effort, leads the spread of misinformation (Webb et al., 2016) and can cause chaos in society (Lukasik et al., 2019). On average, a person shares a good experience with nine others. In comparison, s/he shares a poor experience with 16 people (American Express Survey); unhappy consumers share their poor experience with 11 people (The Sydney Entrepreneur Centre), and a dissatisfied customer tells 9–15 people, and 13% customers share more than 20 persons (While House Office of Consumers Affairs). In social media, this trend increases. In many events related shopping, women are the decision-makers or purchasers. Due to their interaction in social media regarding purchasing these electronics home appliances, they count others’ observation, experiences and recommendation. The home electronics market has been digitalized, and everincreasing and customer interaction in social media has been enhanced. Begum and Zami (2018) stated that some risks prevail in logistic support, price and after-sale services. A report shows that in some cases, customers complaints are not entertained as promised. Product quality of household items is found lower, and after-sale services (repairing, replacement, or servicing) sometimes are dilly-dallying. As a result, customers are found unhappy and dissatisfied with appliances and companies. Beside, HofstedeInsights (2020) illustrates that Bangladeshi society upholds rigid codes of belief and behaviour (Uncertainty Avoidance Index-UAI) and in long term orientation index (LTOI). In this emerging market in Bangladesh, therefore, customer satisfaction needs to be improved, and customer complaints need to be quickly entertained. Academicians or market researchers did not emphasize this crucial issue very much. To best of their knowledge, the authors of this research could not find much relevant literature. According to Lobo (2016), very few literature is available on customer satisfaction on physical product like electronic home appliances. Thus, this study focuses on this important issue to fill up the literature gap which will also implicate in the present market growth. Consequently, the research gap of this study has been conceptualized in the following questions: i) whether the perceived quality of electronics home appliances satisfy the customers and users in Bangladesh where high demand for these home appliances exist; ii) whether customer perceived value (cost-benefit comparison) strengthens the perceived quality and satisfaction relationship; and iii) whether the role of social media usage (the information used, shared, or commented) fluctuates the perceived quality and satisfaction relationship because customers are using social media rampantly and are being influenced by the information therein while buying and using electronics home appliances. The authors examined the relationship of customer satisfaction with its antecedents such as product quality, quality of installation service and after-sale service, their value about the brand and product, and how social media affects the buying decisions based on the recommendation of family members, friends and other customers’ reviews and comments therein. Gerdt et al. (2019); Hirata (2019); Kim et al. (2019) illustrated the significance of customer satisfaction as a vital role in a business organization. A quality product, better customer service, and image of the company satisfy the customer (Shamsudin et al., 2019a). Previous studies demonstrate that customer satisfaction influences a business firm, that is, a happy and delighted customer will repurchase and repeated purchase with a bulk amount (Gerdt et al., 2019). The satisfied customer even is ready to pay more (Shamsudin et al., 2019b) and is ready to advertise to have more customers by suggesting company’s products (Shamsudin et al., 2015b). A satisfied customer invites their family members, friends US$119.99. The Chinese users will spend the most amount compared to the other global users. Another report has forecasted that global home appliances will increase at 8.00% compound annual growth rate in 2025 (ReportLinker, 2020). Similarly, MarketWatch (2020) reported on August 13, 2020, that global home appliance market would grow to US$ 837.00 billion in 2024 at a compound annual growth rate of 5.30 from US$ 615.00 billion in 2020. The top major global brand of home appliances are Haier, Whirlpool, Electrolux, GREE Electronics, BSH Bosch & Siemens. Similarly, the Bangladeshi household appliance market has been expanding rapidly to meet the increasing demand. In Bangladesh, which is the 8th lar-gest population in the world, the annual expenditure is above USD 130.00 billion with a growth rate of 6% per annum. According to a study, BGD (2015) assumed that the middle and affluent class would be around 34 million by 2025 who would use those appliances for a long time (Begum and Zami, 2018). The national poverty line dropped from 14.8% in 2016 to 9.2% in 2019 (ADB, 2020), which indicates an increase in consumers’ purchasing capacity. Home electronic appliances are mostly purchased and used by this large group of people. According to a report of DataBD (2020), electronic market size is of US$ 1.37 billion in Bangladesh (particularly, television: USD 414.22 million, refrigerators: USD 549.11 million, air conditioner: USD 164.57 million and other appliances: USD 251.41 million). Among various electronic categories, refrigerator occupies 40%, and television covers 30% market size. In the television product category, local brands such as Rangs, Walton, Vision, Singer, MyOne are occupying the market. In contrast, international brands such as Sony, Samsung, Panasonic, Toshiba, Phillips, LG, Sanyo are meeting the customers’ needs. Similarly, Walton, MyOne, Minister brands are providing refrigerators goods as a local brand, wherein Samsung, Whirlpool, Kelvinator, LG, Hitachi, Hier, etc. are competing with local brands. Butterfly and Walton (local brands) and General, LG, Daikin, GREE, Carrier, Whirlpool, etc. (foreign) meet AC demand. Besides, other home appliances are getting available at customers’ doorsteps by both local brands like Walton, Electra, Singer, Ecoþ and international brands (Miyako, Sebec, Panasonic, Sharp, SteamFast, etc.) (DataBD, 2020). In this changing twenty-first-century business environment, the need for research on product quality, customer attitude, innovation has poised an inevitable strategy of a business organization to meet and satisfy the multiple role holding consumers (Lau et al., 2019; Moghavvemi et al., 2018; Quang et al., 2018). Besides, customers’ interaction in technology and social media have made this challenge more challenging (Hamzah and Shamsudin, 2020). This competition enables companies to offer better products at a reasonable price (Balakrishnan et al., 2013). A report indicates that the number of social media is increasing with its users in Bangladesh. The recent data shows around 40.70 million users as of March 2020. Among them, a total of 37.91 million (93.28%) are using Facebook; messenger users are 11.28 million (27.52%), and 1.35 (3.31%) million are YouTube users. Similarly, Pinterest users (0.51 mil., 1.24%), Twitter (0.10 mil., 0.98%), Instagram (2.28mil., 5.6%), Reddit (0.05 mil., 0.11%), Tumblr (0.04 mil.,0.1%), LinkedIn (a professional social media) (3.33 mil., 8.18%), VKontakte (0.04 mil.,0.09%) and others (0.98 mil., 0.24%) are using social media (NapoleonCat, 2020). Thus, social media is a large platform for interacting with each other. According to a newspaper report, 94% of total users have access to social media through mobile phone devices (Report, 2018). This report also stated that female users are around 24% of total users. Social media like Facebook, WhatsApp, Instagram, Pinterest affect customer references, usage experience, and recommendation on customer behaviour. In views of Schwartz-Chassidim et al. (2020), people use Facebook as a social media and social network for sharing messages, comments and recommendation. Consumers-interchangeably used as customers (Shamsudin et al., 2018b) as a human being are accustomed to what others do (Feng et al., 2019; Gligor et al., 2019; Hamzah et al., 2016). A loyal customer influences others such as family members, friends, relatives, and peer 2 Md.U.H. Uzir et al. Heliyon 6 (2020) e05710 (1999); Ruyter and Bloemer (1999); Mittal and Kamakura (2001) and Szymanski and Henard (2001). Over the period, the customer satisfaction concept has received attention. Many researchers, academics, and scholars have addressed customer satisfaction to cope with the characteristics of customers in present time. Among them, Ulaga and Eggert (2006); Fornell et al. (2010); Kaura et al. (2015); Ayo et al. (2016); Cheung and To (2016); Kant and Jaiswal (2017); Mannan et al. (2017); Marinkovic and Kalinic (2017); Oh and Kim (2017); Sampaio et al. (2017); Tandon et al. (2017); Keshavarz and Jamshidi (2018); Moorthy et al. (2018); Thielemann et al. (2018) and Tseng (2019) are remarkable in recent years. and peer groups. But a dissatisfied customer shares their dissatisfaction or discomfort in social media (Hassan and Shamsudin, 2019; Shamsudin et al., 2015a, 2015b). Zhang et al. (2019) warned that this negative message in social media might cause a risk for the organization of losing prospective customers. This study underpinned the expectancy disconfirmation theory (EDT) developed by Oliver (1980) to investigate customer satisfaction. This theory explains that customers compare the actual experience of using products and services with expectations about those products. If the actual experience is below the expectations, they will be dissatisfied. Instead, if the actual experience supersedes the expectation, customers will be delighted (Skogland and Siguaw, 2004). This net difference is either satisfaction, dissatisfaction or neutral (Yi, 1990). Customer satisfaction depends on this comparison outcome. Consequently, this current study tries to cover the gaps in the theories, literature, as well as in the practical and industrial issues by initiating-how customer satisfaction interacts the effect of social media usage in the context of electronics household items (Lobo, 2016) in Bangladesh. Understanding the customers’ perception and its determinants will assist brand managers, marketing managers, retail showroom businesses in creating and upholding an appropriate competitive strategy. The current study tried to maintain the flow of the review of literature, development of research hypotheses and conceptual framework, research methodology, data analysis, results, and discussions; finally, conclusion, contribution, implications, limitations and future directions for the study in the following sections respectively. 2.2. Product quality (PQ) According to Tseng (2019), customer satisfaction is very vital to the success of a company; it is also crucial to identify those influential factors. Research on customer satisfaction has not ended yet, and researchers and scholars are making a relentless effort to examine the effect of antecedents and consequence of customer satisfaction. Researchers still are suggesting to conduct more research on this area (Evanschitzky et al., 2012). The product provides consumers with functional benefits (Hankinson and Cowking, 1996) by which a customer fill their needs. The features and characteristics of a product or service reflect product quality. Therefore, product quality means “fitness for use” or ‘conformance to requirement” (Russell and Taylor, 2006). Besides, the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) defines product quality “as the ability to satisfy the customer and market” (Lakhal and Pasin, 2008). However, the term quality has eight dimensions: performance, features, reliability, conformance, durability, serviceability, aesthetics and perceived quality (Garvin, 1984). Some scholars have defined product quality in two ways-perceived and objective, and in this study, perceived product quality was adopted. Product quality concept was used in different research fields. Previously, Aaker (1991); (1996); Cronin and Taylor (1992); Parasuraman et al. (1996); Rao and Monroe (1989); Sweeney et al. (1999); Taylor and Baker (1994) and Zeithaml (1988) used this construct in their works. Later on, Brunsø et al. (2005) and Russell and Taylor (2006) also tested product quality for customer satisfaction. Over the time, the quality of a physical product was prioritized in the research of Calantone and Knight (2000); Cho and Pucik (2005); Forker et al. (1996); Martínez-Costa et al. (2009); Molina-Castillo et al. (2013); Morgan and Vorhies (2001) and Prajogo and Sohal (2004). Very recently, Kotler and Armstrong (2018); Lin et al. (2018) and G€ ok et al. (2019) also studied product quality. 2.1. Customer satisfaction (CS) 2.3. Quality of service (SQ) Satisfaction also refers to the “perceived discrepancy between prior expectation and perceived performance after consumption; performance differs from expectation, dissatisfaction occurs” (Oliver, 1980). Kondou (1999) defines “customer satisfaction as a person’s subjective evaluation of his or her situation results in a positive emotional response.” Consumer satisfaction is a “condition in which consumer expectations would be met by a product” (Kotler and Armstrong, 1999). Customer satisfaction is a psychological response of customers to their positive evaluative consumption outcome (real experience) about their expectations (perception) (Shukla, 2004). According to Chitty et al. (2007), customer satisfaction is a psychological assessment and a constructive comparison between the sacrifice they make by paying (cost) for availing services and products and benefits they receive from the moment of purchase to product life cycle or end of consuming. If real experience (interest) is higher than the perceived expectation (cost/sacrifice), customers become satisfied. Otherwise, they are dissatisfied (Oliver, 1980). Satisfaction is a trade-off of pre and post-consumption or usage of a product (Shamsudin et al., 2018a). Customer satisfaction is thus essential to meeting the various needs of customers and firms (Yi and Nataraajan, 2018). The pursuit of customer satisfaction has become a strategic imperative for most firms that need to sustain and remain competitive (Yi and Nataraajan, 2018). Realizing this importance of customer satisfaction, many scholars attempted to conceptualise and formulate this constructs like- Fornell and Wernerfelt (1988); Anderson and Sullivan (1993); Halstead et al. (1994); Fornell et al. (1996); Oliver (1997); Kotler (1997); Boshoff This study used quality of service to mean the service that a company provides during the purchase and installation of a product (electronic items) and after-sale service (warrantee, replacement, cashback, etc.). With an after-sale service, a company can maintain a long term customer relationship (Shaharudin et al., 2010). As electronic items need some assistance to be associated with for functioning and maintenance (Bei and Chiao, 2006), this study denotes the quality of service as that service for operation and maintaining of the physical products such as installation, repairing and after-sale service. Hu et al. (2009) emphasised on quality of service from customer views and remarked quality of service as an uncompromised core factor of service promise. Like the service industry, physical product-based companies have to assure the quality of service. The “after-sales service” of tangible goods refers to “operative activities” (Gaiardelli et al., 2007). After-sale service is a term that is mostly and widely used while an electronic item is on sale. To customers, after-sale service means some services that are to be received after purchasing products (Vitasek, 2005). These services refer to “field service” when those services are in customer’s sites or customer houses (Simmons, 2001). “After-sales support” is also known as “technical support” (Agnihothri et al., 2002) or even just “services”, are discussed in the previous studies (Goffin and New, 2001). Lele and Karmarkar (1983) mentioned that “after-sales services” are termed as “product support activities” which means those supports activities are related to ‘product-centric transaction’. In literature, these support activities are “customer support” elements that indicate all activities assuring this product is available to consumers “over its useful lifespan for trouble-free 2. Literature 3 Md.U.H. Uzir et al. Heliyon 6 (2020) e05710 inspires the company to serve its customers need in a better way . According to Philip et al. (2016), the role of social network as well as media has become increasingly significant . In their opinion, reviews and recommendations on a product as well as service play an influential role in customer’s decision-making process in the current digital age . With the benefit of a user-generated-content platform, as the studies demonstrate, customers check the product reviews, feedback from customers and recommendations and make a buying decision. Facebook, Facebook Messenger, Imo, Instagram, LinkedIn, Pinterest, QQ, QZone, Skype, Tik Tok, Viber, WeChat, WhatsApp, and YouTube are popular social media networking platforms. Over 2,603 million people in the world actively use Facebook as on April 2020 (Statista, 2020b). In Bangladesh, Facebook, FB Messenger, WhatsApp, Imo, YouTube, LinkedIn, Viber, Skype are very popular and widely used. The study indicates the extent the respondents trust social media for the information, comments, reviews that are posted and shared leading to their buying decision . The more the people use social media and trust the shared information, the more it has an impact on their buying decision and vice versa. On the basis of the critical role of social media and its usage, Hu and Kettinger (2008) researchers to work with social media. The authors of this study formulated the conceptual framework based on an extensive literature review and the objective of this study. use” (Loomba, 1998). Furthermore, the term “after-sales services” is brought in the perspective of two considerations in the literature. Rigopoulou et al. (2008) illustrated these services are “the transport or delivery to clients, the installation, the product-related training, the hotline and advice by the help desk, any repairing service and even the recycling process”. Koyuncu et al. (2014); Shi et al. (2014); Dhar (2015); Kaura et al. (2015); Lai (2015); Zameer et al. (2015); Ayo et al. (2016); Pizam et al. (2016); Kant and Jaiswal (2017); Oh and Kim (2017) and Keshavarz and Jamshidi (2018) worked on service quality in their respective fields in very recent times. 2.4. Customer perceived value (CPV) Zeithaml (1988) defines perceived value as “the consumer’s overall assessment of the utility of a product (or service) based on perceptions of what is received and what is given”. Another scholar, Bettman et al. (1998), meant customer perceived value as “value customers perceive they receive or experience by using a service”. Similarly, Lovelock (2000) defined perceived value as a “trade-off between perceived benefits and perceived costs”. Vandermerwe (2003) stated the practical view of perceived value as a ratio of value a customer receives consuming a product and the value s/he expects before consuming it. Perceived value is the state of fulfilment of what they expect from an electronics household product or its associated service and what they ultimately gain (Uddin, 2013). Perceived value is considered as a vital factor in marketing and for marketers (Keshavarz and Jamshidi, 2018; Oh and Kim, 2017; Thielemann et al., 2018; Zameer et al., 2015). Some scholars find customer perceived value as a stable factor to forecast customer’s buying behaviour (Anderson and Sullivan, 1993; Carroll et al., 2002; Chen and Dubinsky, 2003; van Riel and Pura, 2005). Zeleti et al. (2016); Sabiote-Ortiz et al. (2016); Joung et al. (2016) and Walls (2013) conducted their research on the perceived value. Similarly, other researchers like Wu et al. (2011); Howat and Assaker (2013); Kim et al. (2013); Tung (2013) (Chen and Lin, 2015); Hanna et al. (2011); Ramseook-Munhurrun et al. (2015); Moorthy et al. (2018); Keshavarz and Jamshidi (2018) and Oh and Kim (2017); Thielemann et al. (2018); Zameer et al. (2015) used perceived value in their studies. 2.6. Hypotheses development 2.6.1. Product quality and customer satisfaction Customers purchase and use physical products to meet their requirements. Therefore, a firm need to realize the basic idea of customer requirements (Gerdt et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2019). Companies that offer products (attractive feature, size, colour and functional quality, serviceability, and so on) can enhance competitiveness and obtain higher customer value (Kafetzopoulos et al., 2015) (Prakash et al., 2017). Santouridis and Trivellas (2010) opine that a satisfied consumer is highly possible to stick to existing products whereas a dissatisfied consumer tends to switch to competitors’ products. Uddin (2013), in his study on electronics household appliances in Bangladesh, discloses that perceived product quality positively affects satisfaction, as it is a psychological issue. He also added that customer-oriented and product-selling firms practice quality and persuade consumer satisfaction. Lin et al. (2018) and G€ ok et al. (2019) found that product quality is a strong antecedent of ok et al. (2019) stated that contrast theory excustomer satisfaction. G€ plains the clarification of the product evaluation process and the quality of the product that customer magnifies the gap between the product received and the product expected. If the actual performance of the product fails to meet expectations, the customer will evaluate the product less favourably (Anderson, 1973; Korgaonkar and Moschis, 1982). Quality of products is considered as a driver of customer satisfaction (Ehsani and Ehsani, 2015) and the improved insights of this quality motivate consumer contentment (Uddin, 2013). It is a logical expectation that a customer will be satisfied with the quality of a product of a particular brand (Ayo et al., 2016). Hamzah and Shamsudin (2020) found a significant relationship between product quality and customer satisfaction. Thus, managers of electronics company can focus on developing quality and safe products that fulfil the customers’ needs with satisfaction. The quality of a tangible product is strongly associated with the satisfaction of the customer (Ryu and Han (2010); Jakpar et al. (2012); Vera (2015); and Beneke et al. (2013). Based on past studies, the following has been formulated: 2.5. Social media (SM) and its usage With the support of social media, customers are well-connected with the whole world with a finger-tap (Hamzah and Shamsudin, 2020). Many scholars define social media from their point of view and application. Generally, social media refers to a website and applications by which users can create, view, share and interact content in virtual social media. Kietzmann et al. (2011) depicted social media as “interactive computer-mediated technologies that facilitate creation and sharing of information, ideas, career interests and other forms of expression via virtual communities and networks”. In view of Mangold and Faulds (2009), there is a significant transformation in media, especially in traditional networking in the last ten years. Supporting them, Coulter et al. (2012) noted that conventional networking has been replaced by a system facilitating modern technology. Leung et al. (2019) brought the exact utility of social media. They stated that it is a track of information superhighway, and users can share any information-in text, voice, image, video and other people can read and get information from it at their convenient time. Rao (2019) states that social media in the form of online websites that allow individuals to communicate and establish social networks such as Facebook and web-based videos like those viewed on YouTube. Mirmehdi et al. (2017) pointed out the prominence of social media in the social networking system and remarked how social media influence in the daily decision. In view of Khan and Khan (2012), social media helps get various news and information about products, service; customers read this news, provide reviews, and feedback regarding purchased products . Regarding the role of social media, Sashi (2012) opines that social media H1. Product quality positively and significantly affects customer satisfaction 2.6.2. Quality of service and customer satisfaction In marketing research, service quality receives more attention considering the intangible aspect (Bei and Chiao, 2006). But tangible products require some sorts of services associated with them. The 4 Md.U.H. Uzir et al. Heliyon 6 (2020) e05710 Lin (2015) who worked on social media and blowing, Kim et al. (2013) on mobile user engagement, and Unyathanakorn and Rompho (2014) on commercial banking. They found that customer perceived value has a positive impact on customer satisfaction. One of the past studies by Uddin and Akhter (2012) in Bangladesh demonstrated that customers’ perceived value has a significant direct effect on the satisfaction of the customer in mobile phone services. Similarly, according to Uddin (2013), customer perceived value has a positive effect on the users of electronics products in Bangladesh. After reviewing the previous literature, the Hypothesis proposed is as follows: concept of a product-service continuum indicates service and only product as the two extreme bipolar (Rathmell, 1966), that is, the support of services is required to some extent for most of electronics products. This support service is associated with satisfaction. For this reason, customer satisfaction is an outcome of perceived quality (Ayo et al., 2016). Kondasani and Panda (2015); Ali and Raza (2015); Hu et al. (2009) were applauded for exploring the relationship between these two constructs. The quality of service, namely after-sale service, is very vital in the case of electronics appliances. With an after-sale service, a company can maintain a long term customer relationship (Shaharudin et al., 2010). As has been argued, service for the tangible product is the intangible value offered to customers (Alteren and Tudoran (2016); O’Dwyer and Gilmore (2018); and Gligor et al. (2019). Chinomona et al. (2013) conducted a study in the retail industry in South Africa and found that service quality and customer satisfaction are positively and significantly related. Another study conducted by Kondasani and Panda (2015) in India illustrated that customer satisfaction and service quality are positively associated with each other. Similarly, the study done by Minh et al. (2015) implies that service quality plays an essential role as a driver for higher customer satisfaction level in hotel service in Vietnam. Likewise, some authors worked on the physical product to find significance in this relationship. Like, Cronin and Taylor (1992) showed that customer services in four services industries such as banking, laundry, pest control and processed food have positive effects on customer satisfaction. And Gilbert et al. (2007) also finds this relationship significant in restaurant business where fifty percent service and fifty percent physical products (like food, water and so on). As electronics home appliances require some associated service after selling the products, after-sale service is very significant for customers and users satisfaction (Ehsani and Ehsani, 2015). In his study of electronics home appliances in Bangladesh, Uddin (2013) shows that customer service plays an influential role in determining customer satisfaction. Past studies showed evidence that perceptions of service quality influences satisfaction different industries and in different country contexts (Beigi et al., 2016; Chen, 2008; Olorunniwo et al., 2006; Tsai et al., 2007). Thus, the authors proposed the following Hypothesis: H3. Customer perceived value positively and significantly affects customer satisfaction. 2.6.4. Product quality and customer perceived value Extant literature demonstrates that product quality as predictors of customers’ perceived value (Bolton and Drew, 1991; Chen and Hu, 2010; Lai, 2015; Zeithaml, 1988). Studies by Ryu and Jang (2008) appear to be the only empirical evidence indicating that food quality significantly affected perceived value. Hanzaee and Yazad (2010); Razak et al. (2016) mentioned the apparent effect of product quality on customer perceived value. According to a study conducted by Yang et al. (2016) on product features, like its functionality and usefulness, perceived product quality has a direct effect on customers’ perceived value. Only the customer can evaluate whether or not a product or service provides value for their money and the concept of customer perceived value is perceived to be very subjective and personal (Liu and Jang, 2009; Parasuraman et al., 1985). In the case of Bangladeshi electronics home appliances market, product quality is considered a successful predictor of customer perceived value (Uddin, 2013). Additionally, Sweeney et al. (1997) regarded customers’ perceived value as an outcome of perceived product quality. Based on these studies, the following Hypothesis is proposed: H4. Product quality positively and significantly affects customers’ perceived value. 2.6.5. Quality of service and customers’ perceived value Service quality serves as a predictor of customer perceived value (Bolton and Drew, 1991; Chen and Hu, 2010; Lai et al., 2009; Zeithaml, 1988). In line with earlier findings, Agarwal and Teas (2002); Butz and Goodstein (1996) found the perceived quality to have a significant influence on perceived value. In other words, the better the service quality is, the higher the customers’ perceived value obtained (Howat and Assaker, 2013; Tam, 2004; Yu and Yuan, 2019). Another critical view is that perceived value also believed as a trigger of customer satisfaction. There are cogent empirical pieces of evidence to buttress the idea that quality of service is positively related to perceived value (Brady and Robertson, 1999; Ravald and Gr€ onroos, 1996; Teas and Agarwal, 2000). Similarly Eggert and Ulaga (2002); Lai (2015); Oh (1999); Thielemann et al. (2018) highlighted that the quality of service’s features (tangibles, empathy, reliability, and responsiveness) are associated with consumers’ perceived value. Liu and Jang (2009); Parasuraman et al. (1985) viewed customer value as subjective and personal. Meanwhile, Sweeney et al. (1997), regarded customers’ perceived value as an outcome of perceived service quality. Based on these studies, the study proposed the following Hypothesis: H2. Quality of service positively and significantly affects the relationship with customer satisfaction. 2.6.3. Customer perceived value and customer satisfaction Customers are rapturous and want to get ensured for the value for their money (Campbell and Stanley (2015); Chicu et al. (2019); Hirata (2019); and Rita et al. (2019). Delivering superior customer value and the resulting customer satisfaction are crucial to the competitive edge of a firm (Murali et al., 2016). In their study, McDougall and Levesque (2000) similarly discuss the significance of customer perceived value on customer satisfaction. According to them, perceived value is a strong predictor of satisfaction. In view of Zeithaml (1988), when a customer considers his benefits much more than the expenditure, he gets satisfied. Therefore, perceived value is determinant of satisfaction (Uddin, 2013). Aligned with the intuition, Fornell et al. (1996) and Hu et al. (2009) supported that perceived value has a positive influence on customer satisfaction. However, there is a debate on whether customer perceived value has a direct or indirect effect on customers’ satisfaction (Ravald and Gr€ onroos, 1996). Fazal and Kanwal (2017) conducted a study on mobile phone users in Pakistan. They showed that customer perceived value has a positive and significant impact on user satisfaction of the mobile phone. The effect of customer perceived value on satisfaction can be wellperceived by digging more in-depth in the literature. A significant number of previous studies reflect that customer value affects satisfaction (Chen, 2008; Tsai et al., 2007). Hu et al. (2009) explored the relationship between perceived value and customer satisfaction, and accordingly to their findings, superior customer value ensures higher customer satisfaction. Some studies on this relationship were conducted by Chen and H5. Quality of service positively and significantly affects customer’ perceived value. 2.6.6. Mediating effect of perceived value Value is the function of consumer evaluation; thus, it is subjective where the cost and benefit must be favourable (Itani et al., 2019; Peng et al., 2019). Therefore, the marketing literature focused the concept of customer value, putting it at the centre and as one of the core strategies when serving consumers (Fang et al., 2016; Prebensen and Xie, 2017). Nonetheless, companies are well-aware that their consumers are highly 5 Md.U.H. Uzir et al. Heliyon 6 (2020) e05710 asking for social validation of their decision from both their online and offline social networks, which is often out of sight of the actual retailer or brand (Hall et al., 2017; Nunan and Di Domenico, 2019). The empirical evidence indicated that rapid and continued growth in shopper’s marketing requires precise communication strategies to drive performance (Hall et al., 2017). Through the use of smartphones and other devices, people have more access to information than ever before. Consumers can get detailed knowledge about products instantly nowadays. The concern of the current study, therefore, is to demonstrate-the extent the users and customers of electronics home appliances trust and apply the information in their product selection, buying decision and recommending others. Therefore, the usage of social media comes handy for developing moderating hypotheses: empowered and will only purchase value-added products which are capable of providing a highly satisfying experience (Yang et al., 2016). However, the value is assessed based on the perception of the individual customers, as the same offering might be perceived to hold different value levels among customers (El-Adly, 2019). Also, Slater and Narver (2000) have explained that value is maximized when the benefits from the firm’s offerings are more than the related costs (e.g., price, search, time, and psychic cost). Thus, firms should deliver more value to customers by providing them more benefits and fewer expenses; failing to do so will lead firms to lose the probability of gaining a competitive advantage. As a result, customers may search for new alternatives (Itani et al., 2019; Marbach et al., 2016). Thus, we predict that product quality and quality of service shape the customers’ perceived value; such that these customers perceive values that invite and reinforce customers’ satisfaction (Chen and Lin, 2019). A significant indirect association exists between service quality and behavioural intention through perceived value and customer satisfaction (Cronin et al. (2000); Kim et al. (2013); Oh (1999). Again, the findings of Keshavarz and Jamshidi (2018) reflect the mediating role of perceived value in the relationship between quality and satisfaction. Similarly, Edward and Sahadev (2011) investigated the significant mediating effect of perceived value in mobile service providers in India. According to Oh and Kim (2017), a total of 21 percent of studies focused on customer perceived value in the last 15 years, e.g. from 2000- 2015. Malik (2012) had research involving the mediating role of perceived value and found customer perceived value as a partial mediator in the relationship between perceived service quality and customer satisfaction. Also, Lukito and Yustini (2019) discovered a partial mediating role of customers’ perceived value. Therefore, the following hypotheses are proposed in line with the above literature: H8a. Social media usage moderates the relationship between product quality and customer’ satisfaction, such as the relationship is stronger when the usage of social media is high than low. H8b. Social media usage moderates the relationship between quality of service and customer’ satisfaction, such as the relationship is stronger when the usage of social media is high than low. H8c. Social media usage moderates the relationship between customer perceived value and customer’ satisfaction, such as the relationship is stronger when the usage of social media is high than low. 2.7. Theoretical assessment The study underpinned two theories to support the conceptual framework and met the assumptions of those with the objective of the study. H6. Customer perceived value mediates the relationship between PQ and customer satisfaction. 2.7.1. Expectation disconfirmation theory (EDT) Expectation Disconfirmation Theory, introduced by Oliver (1977) and developed in (1980), is a cognitive theory or assumption that entails the post-purchase or post-adoption satisfaction. It is a function of expectations, perceived performance, and disconfirmation of beliefs. Satisfaction is conceptualized in several ways in the literature to date (Hair et al., 2010), and confirmation–disconfirmation approach (Veloutsou, 2015). Skogland and Siguaw (2004) prescribe three types of satisfaction, such as natural feeling, satisfaction (confirmation) and dissatisfaction (disconfirmation). The natural feeling exists if customers receive actual performance similar to the standard they expect. If actual performance is better than the natural feeling (standard), it confirms satisfaction. On the other hand, if actual performance fails to meet natural feeling, unfortunately it leads dissatisfaction. According to this theory, a customer assesses his/her satisfaction levels by comparing their expectation with the experience received from the product quality, quality of service and their post evaluative behaviour and customer satisfaction. Past studies indicate the different effects of performance, expectations and disconfirmation (Yi and Nataraajan, 2018). being developed and tested in western countries, satisfaction theories are gradually extending to developing counties in a different context,. An Asian country well-known as Bangladesh with a large population, increased market size, and a different culture, is a choice of this study to utilize this theory. In a different context, it is required to test the application of customer satisfaction theories (Yi and Nataraajan, 2018). According to the expectancy disconfirmation theory, as the scholars opine, customers expect a benefit or utility from the product that before buying any product, customers expect a benefit or utility from the product. They use or consume the products, _measure the prior expectation from product and the performance and at the end compare the expectation with the actual performance they receive. This comparison confirm satisfaction or dissatisfaction. In case of buying and using electronics home appliances, the customers compare their expectation before buying with actual benefits they receive during and the post usage. H7. Customer perceived value mediates the relationship between SQ and customer satisfaction. 2.6.7. Social media usage and its moderating role with customer satisfaction According to Sashi (2012), social media plays a part to build a buyer-seller relationship. Lang (2010) stated that people spend more than one-third of their working day using social media. Only Facebook has more than 2.40 billion active users (Statista, 2020b). However, like Facebook, users are involved in spending their time on all other social media. These platforms are interactive as concerned with views, comments, and recommendations about the usage of products, including additional issues of life. Laroche et al. (2012) conducted a study using CB-SEM on social media effect in their model. They found that brand communities established on social media have a positive impact on their community (i.e., shared consciousness, shared rituals and traditions, and obligations to society), which have positive effects on value creation practices (i.e., social networking, community engagements, impressions management, and brand usage). Social media and its popularity as a unique element, have opened a new horizon for marketing practices (Hanna et al., 2011). Even social media affects “consumer behaviour through information acquisition to post-purchase behaviour such as dissatisfaction statements or behaviours” (Mangold and Faulds, 2009). In consumers’ buying decision process, there are influences and motivation from the family members, colleagues, peers and neighbours, media personalities, traditional and digital media (promotions and advertisement) as well as the internet (Hayan and Samaan (2015). Villarroel et al. (2019) did extensive text mining from social media and analysed those online data. They unearthed that online text message (in Facebook and Twitter) contains emotion and information, and the satisfied customers share their experience and recommend electronics products to their known persons (Uddin, 2013). Particularity, shoppers undertake various activities before they make their final purchase decision. This effort may include seeking content from different retailers and 6 Md.U.H. Uzir et al. Heliyon 6 (2020) e05710 the prior studies to measure customer perceived value (CPV) (Aaker, 1996; Parasuraman et al., 1985; Schechter, 1984; Sekaran and Bougie, 2009; Walls, 2013). To measure social media usage 4-items were slightly adapted from the earlier studies (Brito, 2011; Freidman, 2011; Mangold and Faulds, 2009). Finally, we measured customer satisfaction (CS) with five items taken from previous researches (Faullant et al., 2008; Parasuraman et al., 1985; Schechter, 1984; Sekaran and Bougie, 2009; Walls, 2013; Zeithaml, 1988). 4. Data analysis and results Covariance-based structural equation modelling (CB-SEM) was employed to test the conceptual model of this study. CB-SEM carries some advantages. It is a parameter estimation where maximum likelihood (ML) method was used (Hair et al., 2017b). The data were analyzed with CB-SEM technique and using AMOS software (v.24). Two analytical steps were considered, such as the measurement model and the structural model. Measurement model encompasses reliability, validity and overall model fitness of the constructs and the structural model deals with hypotheses testing. Figure 1. Conceptual framework. Based on the literature and insights of the EDT theory, the study developed the following framework (see Figure 1). 3. Methodology The study was based_on household members (both male and female) in Dhaka, the capital city of Bangladesh. The quantitative method was adopted in this study, where a total of 300 respondents participated based on the judgmental sampling technique. A judgmental sampling, also known as purposive sampling, refers to the sampling method that chooses the units to be judged as the most representative of the population (Saunders et al., 2016). The researcher imposes a subjective experience and condition (criteria) to select samples from the intended population (Saunders et al., 2016). The quality of samples selected by using this approach depends on the accuracy of subjective interpretations which constitutes a typical sample (Valliant and Dever, 2018). We employed this technique following the goal of this research is to achieve theory generalization, as the complete sampling frame is not available in the given context (Memon et al., 2017; Hulland et al., 2018). The questionnaire was shared in Facebook messenger group, WhatsApp group, the LinkedIn group with a request to fill those out. Some questionnaire was also distributed through known email addresses. The reason for using electronic surveys (i) to minimize effort and cost (ii) to approach the largest respondents compared to the self-administered survey because in the technological era, all individuals are attached to mobile phone or computer device. Thus, that supported the researchers to approach the targeted respondents of the current study. Prior to that, a standardized and structured questionnaire was developed from the literature. The data collection period was between March to June 2019. The questionnaire with cover letter stated the purpose of the survey assuring the confidentiality and sought the consent of respondents. In addtion, researchers conducted studies involving human participants per institutional committee’s ethical standards (Putra Business School Research Ethical Committee headed by Prof. Dr. Zulkornain Yusop, Reference Number: PBS/PhD/PBS18123252 dated March 15, 2019) and the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. 4.1. Demographic information Table 1 presents the demographic information. Among surveyed 300 respondents in this study, 144 (48%) were male, and 156 (52%) were female, 198 (66%) respondents belonged to 31–40 years. A total of 273 (91%) was married, and 24 (8%) unmarried. Respondents were from diverse occupations such as students (21; 7%), jobseekers (33; 11%), selfemployed (18; 6%), government employees (72; 24%), private service (90; 30%) and homemakers (66; 22%). 4.2. Exploratory and preliminary data analysis Exploratory data analysis (EDA) were processed with the aid of the SPSS software. EDA includes missing data, data outliers, data normality, mean, median, standard deviation, correlation, linearity, multicollinearity, and homoscedasticity for determination of reliability, validity, measurement and structural models. For path coefficient analysis, covariance-based structural equation modeling (CB-SEM) was utilized. Abdollahi and Talib (2015); Kline (2010) stated some advantages while using SEM, especially CB-SEM. Hair et al. (2017a) supported the adoption of the maximum likelihood method for parameter estimation. In the measurement model, model fitness was checked, and in the structural model, the proposed hypotheses were tested. SPSS output showed no missing data in the dataset. It was possible for the authors’ vigilance and persuasion to respondents. Extreme and unexpected data in the dataset were checked through univariate and multivariate outlier analysis (Kline, 2015). Cook’s distance and Leverage values for outliers showed that three cases contained absolute values and accordingly were deleted. Data normality is one of the very vital issues in multiple regression (Sun et al., 2015), especially in SEM (Hair et al., 2016). Traditionally, the skewness and kurtosis statistics were also checked, and the Skewness-Kurtosis values were within acceptable range 1.96 (Byrne, 2013; Hair et al., 2017a). Besides, the Shapiro-Wilks test showed that data distribution was normal. Multicollinearity is a threat to multiple regression, including SEM (Hair et al., 2016). The correlation coefficient among the independent variables was not highly correlated. The result from coefficient collinearity diagnosis showed that the variance inflation factor (VIF) was below 1.70 (highest is 1.63 for customer perceived value). Therefore, data were derived from the normal distribution, and there was no evidence of multicollinearity. The scattered residual plots showed that the residuals were_scattered randomly around the zero lines and had no triangular-shaped pattern. It also proved that there was no sufficient evidence heteroscedasticity of the error terms (Hair et al., 2010). 3.1. Variables measurement All the instruments were taken from a reliable source. Before the main data collection phase, the questionnaire was checked by academic experts to ensure content validity. Therefore, the variables were measured by self-report on multi-item scales derived from previous studies. All the measures were assessed by seven-point Likert-type as ‘1’ representing ‘strongly disagree’ and ‘7’ representing ‘strongly agree’. All the items have been presented in Table 3. To measure product quality (PQ), four indicators were adapted from Parasuraman and Grewal (2000). We measured quality of service (SQ) with 4-items adapted from (Rigopoulou et al., 2008). Four items were taken from 7 Md.U.H. Uzir et al. Heliyon 6 (2020) e05710 Table 1. Demographic information. Characteristics Gender Age Category Marital Status No % Characteristics Male 144 48% Occupation Female 156 52% No. % Students 21 7% Job seekers 33 11% Less than 26 12 4% Self-employed 18 6% 26–30 21 7% Govt. Service 72 24% 30% 31–35 87 29% Private Service 90 36–40 111 37% Homemakers 66 22% 41–45 42 14% Facebook 90 97% Social Media Usage (Multiple response) 46–50 15 5% FB Messenger 230 77% More than 50 12 4% YouTube 156 52% Married 273 91% WhatsApp 68 23% Unmarried 24 8% Twitter 24 8% Single (widowed, divorced, separated) 3 1% LinkedIn 45 15% Imo 87 29% Viber 50 17% and MSV test were done. Diagonal value is higher than the corresponding value of the respective row and column values (values are bold shown in Table 4). It indicates that the construct’s correlation is higher than the correlation with other constructs. Similarly, maximum shared variance (MSV) is lower than AVE, but higher than average shared variance (ASV) (Table 4). Thus, the measurement variables are unique and discriminant from each other. 4.3. Common method variance or common method bias test Common method bias exists if principal constructs are significantly and highly correlated (r > 0.90) (Bagozzi et al., 1991). The correlation matrix reveals that variables are not highly correlated. Therefore, there is no initial evidence of possible CMV in this current research. Nitzl (2016) asserted that the overall correlation between items might be inflated and shows a significant relationship between constructs while at the same time reduces the discriminant validity between constructs. The correlation among all the constructs was found less than 0.90. The present study also applied Harman’s single-factor test (Podsakoff and Organ, 1986) to check for CMV. This test is conducted using principal component analysis (PCA) as suggested by (Tehseen et al., 2017). The unrotated principal axis factoring analysis reveals that a single factor explains 37.258% variance (Table 2), which is less than 50% (Al Halbusi et al., 2020; Kumar, 2012; Uzir et al., 2019, 2020). Hence, this suggests that common method bias in this study is non-existent and not a major concern and unlikely to inflate relationships between variables. Table 5 indicated that CMN/DF was 1.672, which is lower than the threshold value (5.00). GFI (0.923) is an acceptable level, and CFI (0.981) is very good. The indicators of the badness of the model were acceptable level as RMR and RMSEA were 0.023 (<0.05) and 0.047 (<0.08) respectively which were less than the threshold (Hair et al., 2017b). The overall results demonstrated the measurement model fitted good and was eligible for the structural model (Figure 2). 4.4. Measures of reliability, validity and measurement model 4.6. Path coefficient and structural model Measurement model has some properties such as reliability and validity for measuring each construct to be measured through SEM-AMOS. With individual CFA and model fitness indices of the measurement model, the strength of the relationship path was checked through the structural model. Table 3 showed the measurement elements. For item reliability, the results reveal no serious problems as most of the items exceed the recommended 0.707 level (Hair et al., 2017b). To evaluate the constructs’ internal consistency, we used composite reliability; it ranged from 0.889 to 0.963, higher than the cut-offs value 0.70 (Hair et al., 2017b). In support of convergent validity, the average variance extracted (AVE) for the constructs ranged from 0.668 to 0.902, above the threshold 0.50 (Hair et al., 2017b). In the case of discriminant validity, cross-loading, the square-root of AVE (Fornell and Larcker ratio), ASV The structural model (path coefficient) describes the association and effect of independent variables on the dependent variable. SEM method, especially the maximum likelihood method, can test complex models rigorously and find integrating multiple associations among multi-item variables, and moderating and mediating effects (Berraies et al., 2017). The β of path coefficient shows the direct impact of latent predictor variable on predicted variables (Figure 3). Table 6 shows that product quality (β ¼ 0.190, CR ¼ 3.247, p < 0.001) has a positive and significant effect on customer satisfaction which supports the first Hypothesis. Similarly, quality of service (β ¼ 0.214, CR ¼ 3.597, p < 0.001) has a significant and positive relationship on customer satisfaction (Hypothesis 2). Customer perceived value (β ¼ 0.224, CR ¼ 3.704, p < 0.001) also has a positive relationship with 4.5. Model fit assessment Table 2. Common method variance test via single factor. Factor Initial Eigenvalues Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings Total % of Variance Cumulative % Total % of Variance Cumulative % 1 25.335 37.258 37.258 24.724 36.359 36.359 2 8.115 11.933 49.191 3 4.610 6.779 55.970 Extraction Method: Principal Axis Factoring. 8 Md.U.H. Uzir et al. Heliyon 6 (2020) e05710 Table 3. Measurement model, item loadings, construct reliability and convergent validity. Constructs Coding Items Description Loading Product Quality PQ1 The brand has an excellent functional quality. 0.954 PQ2 The brand offers very durable products. 0.920 PQ3 Products of the brand are reliable. 0.922 PQ4 The brand offers products with excellent features. 0.926 Quality of Service Customer Perceived value Social Media Usage Customer satisfaction SQ1 Reliability in delivery times. 0.937 SQ2 Quality of the product packaging when delivered. 0.947 SQ3 Kindness and friendliness of the personnel. 0.950 SQ4 Flawless of the installation. 0.964 CPV1 I think the price of the product is equivalent to its quality. 0.925 CPV2 The brand provides high-quality customer services. 0.906 CPV3 I feel relaxed in buying this product. 0.909 CPV4 I feel trust, safe and confident in buying the product from this company. 0.640 SM1 Social media have made, more convenient access to brand information. 0.767 SM2 Social media help us compare various brands. 0.838 SM3 I think I am getting benefits from social media in choosing a brand. 0.801 SM4 I think the usage of social media has any positive effects on selecting a brand. 0.898 CS1 The brand meets my expectations. 0.830 CS2 I am satisfied with my decision to buy this brand. 0.753 CS3 The brand is the only one that I buy and use. 0.838 CS4 I would recommend the product or service to others 0.846 CS5 I am satisfying delighted with this brand. Dropped CA CR AVE 0.963 0.866 0.973 0.902 0.913 0.728 0.896 0.685 0.889 0.668 0.963 0.973 0.904 0.893 0.887 Notes: CR ¼ Composite Reliability, AVE ¼ Average Variance Extracted. Table 4. Discriminant validity. 1. CustSat AVE MSV ASV 1 0.668 0.228 0.105 0.818 2 3 4 2. ProdQual 0.866 0.047 0.016 0.216 0.931 3. ServQual 0.902 0.073 0.034 0.270 0.087 0.950 4. CustPerVal 0.728 0.072 0.041 0.269 0.032 0.180 0.853 5. SocMed 0.685 0.228 0.080 0.477 0.090 0.158 0.240 5 0.827 Table 5. Overall model fit. Construct CMIN/DF GFI CFI NFI RMR RMSEA PClose Indicator Value 1.672 0.923 0.981 0.954 0.023 0.047 0.656 indirect effect (Hayes, 2009; Williams and MacKinnon, 2008). From Table 7, it was found that product quality (0.217, 95 per cent CI) has a significant direct effect on customer satisfaction but has an customer satisfaction (Hypothesis 3). The relationship between product quality and customer perceived value was not significant (β ¼ 0.017, CR ¼ 0.277, p < 0.782) which implies that the fourth hypothesis has been supported. On the other hand, the quality of service has a positive relationship with customer perceived value (β ¼ 0.179, CR ¼ 2.99, p < 0.001) (Hypothesis 5). 4.7. Mediating role of customers’ perceived value By using the bootstrapping method, it was possible to ascertain the mediating effect (indirect) of the customers’ perceived value in the relationship between independent variables (product quality and quality of service) and dependent variable (customer satisfaction). Preacher and Hayes (2008) initially suggested this bootstrapping technique as a tool for investigating the indirect effects of different variables. It is also relevant in obtaining accurate results while calculating the confidence intervals (CIs) of indirect relationships, as suggested by Baron and Kenny (1986). In this study, 5000 subsample bootstrapping in bias-corrected confidence interval at 95% provide the following results (Table 7) as bootstrapping is a powerful tool to test Figure 2. Measurement model. 9 Md.U.H. Uzir et al. Heliyon 6 (2020) e05710 Figure 3. Structural model. Table 6. Result of hypotheses testing. Hypotheses & Path B Beta (β) Standard Error Critical Ratio P-value Result H1: P Q → CS 0.155 0.190 0.048 3.247 0.001 Supported H2: SQ → CS 0.090 0.214 0.025 3.597 *** Supported H3: CPV → CS 0.122 0.224 0.033 3.704 *** Supported H4: PQ → CPV 0.025 0.017 0.089 0.277 0.782 Rejected H5: SQ → CPV 0.137 0.179 0.046 2.99 0.003 Supported B ¼ unstandardized regression weights, Beta (β) ¼ standardized regression weights and ***p < 0.001. Table 7. Mediating effect (indirect effect) of customer perceived value. Hypotheses Direct Mediation Indirect Mediation type PQ → CS 0.217*** 0.190*** 0.004(NS) Lower band: -0.024 Upper band: 0.054 No mediation SQ → CS 0.271*** 0.214*** 0.040*** Lower band: 0.012 Upper band: 0.095 Partial mediation ***P < .0.001. Figure 4. Direct model: PQ-CPV-CS. 10 Md.U.H. Uzir et al. Heliyon 6 (2020) e05710 Figure 5. Mediating model: PQ-CPV-CS. Figure 6. Direct model: SQ-CPV-CS. Figure 7. Mediating model: SQ-CPV-CS. Figures 4, 5, 6, and 7 showed the mediation of customer perceived value. insignificant indirect impact on customer satisfaction (0.004). Hence, customer perceived value has no mediation effect on the relationship between product quality and customer satisfaction (Hypothesis 6). Furthermore, the quality of service has both a significant direct effect (0.271) and indirect effect 0.040) on customer satisfaction. Hence, customer perceived value has a partial mediating role in the relationship between quality of service and customer satisfaction (Hypothesis 7). 4.8. Moderating effect of social media usage Social media usage has been utilized as the moderator in this study and was categorized into three levels: low usage, mid usage, and high 11 Md.U.H. Uzir et al. Heliyon 6 (2020) e05710 0.05). The effect of quality of service on customer satisfaction was significant at both low level (β ¼ 0.270, p < 0.001) and high level (β ¼ 0.238, p < 0.001) but insignificant at mid-level (β ¼ 0.131, p > 0.05). The effect of customer perceived value on customer satisfaction was significant at both low level (β ¼ 0.262, p < 0.001) and high level (β ¼ -0.081, p < 0.001) but insignificant at mid-level (β ¼ 0.118, p > 0.05). usage. These levels are the extent to which a customer has faith on the information available in social media. Before testing the moderation effect, the study checked the measurement invariance of the composite model. 4.8.1. Measurement invariance of composite model (MI-COM) Eberl (2010), while describing measurement invariance states that “….. the loading and weights of the constructs’ measurement model must not differ significantly within the model” (p. 504). Hair et al. (2017) signified measurement invariance composite model (MI-COM) and mentioned that “… variations in the structural model relationships between latent variables could stem from the different meaning the groups’ respondents attribute to the phenomena being measured, rather than the true differences in the structural relationships”. In this study, the usage of social media was grouped into low, medium and high. According to Henseler et al. (2016), the first step of MI-COM is configuration invariance. Configuration invariance is achieved if the factor loadings of items are invariance in the measurement model. The study found that regression weights of items with constructs were significant; CFI and TLI were higher than 0.90, and RMSEA was less than 0.08. In the second step-parameter invariance, unconstraint model, measurement weights, structural covariance and measurement residuals were checked. Unconstraint model’s Chi-square was insignificant. Model one showed that invariance between groups (CFI, TLI) was higher than 0.90, and RMSEA was 0.70. Model 2 (structural covariance and correlation) and model 3 (measurement residuals) showed that invariance was significant. Considering the factor invariance, parameter invariance, and their significance, the study found that this measurement model was invariant. Therefore, moderating effect could be checked. 4.9. Mediated (perceived value) moderating (social media usage) effect on PQ → CS and SQ → CS According to the findings demonstrated in Table 11, perceived value does not mediate the relationship between product quality and customer satisfaction at a different level of using social media. Similarly, the perceived value does not mediate the relationship quality of service and customer satisfaction (Table 12). 5. Discussions The main objective of this study was to investigate the relationships among product quality, quality of service and customer satisfaction, and how customers’ perceived value mediates and social media usage moderates these relationships. The results showed that product quality has a positive and significant relationship with customer satisfaction (Hypothesis 1). This finding is consistent with a similar study conducted by Uddin (2013) on electronics household markets in Bangladesh. Conversely, the results are also identical to the outcome of various researches over the period. The corresponding results were found by Hill and Alexander (2016), Ryu and Han (2010), Ryu and Jang (2008) as well as Santouridis and Trivellas (2010). Later on, Beneke et al. (2013); Jakpar et al. (2012); Kafetzopoulos et al. (2015); Vera (2015); Verhoef and Lemon (2013); Wang et al. (2012) and Prakash et al. (2017) also confirmed equivalent findings that product quality is positively related to customer satisfaction. Product quality is the functionality and conformance of the product that serve the purchasers and users satisfactorily. People purchase electronics home appliances of their favourite brand for their convenience. In Bangladesh, customers focus on product durability, usability, design, colour shape and physical outlook. Products should be convenience, and fit and easy to use. Customers first expect the electronics appliances to be fit for usage (Russell and Taylor, 2006) and meet their requirements (Crosby and Stephens, 1987). If the home appliances meet the daily requirement of the customers and make the life easy and comfortable, customers will be delighted and satisfied to that brand (Gerdt et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2019). G€ ok et al. (2019) in their recent research that quality of physical products satisfies the users. The electronics home appliances TV, fridge, washing machine, fan, lights, oven, air conditioners, etc. have some risks, for example, electric shock, blast, short-circuit, etc.; sometimes these risks harm users. The safety of electronics home appliance is a considerable issue to customers. Herrington and Weaven (2009), as well as Feigenbaum (1991) argued on product quality control and production quality for product safety, which ensure customer satisfaction. Therefore, product quality, such as functionality has a significant influence on customer satisfaction. This finding has been supported by the expectancy-disconfirmation theory (EDT) by comparing the customer perception of product quality and their expectations (Oliver, 1980). The study has also found the quality of service has a positive and significant relationship with customer satisfaction (Hypothesis 2). The findings indicated that installation service, demonstration of using electronic items, pre-cautions regarding possible dangers, after-sale service, warranty, repairing service, and home service are very vital to customers. The findings of the study suggested that quality of service, like other intangible pure services, are the influential factor in customer satisfaction. Chen (2008) and Hu et al. (2009) spoke about similar outcomes in 4.8.2. The categorical moderating effect of social media usage This section tests the moderating effect of social media in the three hypotheses 6a, 6b, and 6c. earlier mentioned. Social media usage construct was categorized into three multi-group- low, medium, and high. The result showed (Table 8) that social media moderate the relationship as unconstrained model (Chi-Square: 2.627, CFI: 0.919, IFI: 0.920, RMSEA: 0.074) and is better than measurement residuals (ChiSquare: 3.372, CFI: 0.848, IFI: 0.848, RMSEA: 0.089) as well as statistically significant (p ¼ 0.000) (Hair et al., 2017b). For the moderator (multi-group) variables, social media has been categorized into three groups based on the mean. The category calculation was done by deducting lower scale point (1) from the upper scale point (5), and the difference has been divided into 3 (e.g. three categories). Here interval is 1.33 (5-1 ¼ 4, 4/3 ¼ 1.33). Classification for low level is 1 þ 1.33 ¼ 2.33 and below, mid-level ¼ 1.33 þ 2.33 ¼ 3.66 and below; and high level above 3.66. The path was moderated by the level of social media where β of three categories (low, mid and high level) gives different significance or all paths are either negatively significant or positively significant (Table 9). Social media does not affect those who use these media less. In regard to medium usage of social media, users are affected much. Medium users get various information from the reviews, recommendations, and feedbacks shared in these media. Low-level users and high-level users cognitively ignore comments. Social media usage construct was categorised into three multi-groupslow, medium, and high (Table 10). The findings showed that social media moderate the relationship as unconstrained model (Chi-Square: 2.627, CFI: 0.919, IFI: 0.920, RMSEA: 0.074) is better than measurement residuals (Chi-Square: 3.372, CFI: 0.848, IFI: 0.848, RMSEA: 0.089) and statistically significant (p ¼ 0.000) (Hair et al., 2010). From Table 10, the effect of product quality on customer satisfaction is significant at a low level ((β ¼ 0.395, p < 0.001) but insignificant at both mid-level ((β ¼ -0.054, p > 0.05) and high level (β ¼ 0.037, p > 12 Md.U.H. Uzir et al. Heliyon 6 (2020) e05710 Table 8. Moderation effect of social media usage. Hypothesis Table 11. Mediated (Perceived Value) moderated (Social Media Usage) effect on PQ > CS. Beta and p-Value Combined Model Low Medium High PQ→CS 0.190*** 0.395*** -0.054 0.037 SQ→CS 0.215*** 0.270*** 0.131 0.238*** CPV→CS 0.223*** 0.262*** 0.118 -0.081*** Level Relationship Parameter Comments Low Direct 0.121*** No Mediation Mediation 0.123*** Indirect 0.004 (NS) Lower Band: -0.006 Upper Band: 0.039 Note: *** indicates significant. Mid Table 9. Moderating effect of social media usage. Hypothesis Direct 0.126*** Mediation 0.118*** Indirect 0.004 (NS) Lower Band: -0.007 Upper Band: 0.034 Beta and p-Value Combined Model Low Medium High High PQ→CS 0.190*** 0.395*** -0.054 0.037 SQ→CS 0.215*** 0.270*** 0.131 0.238*** CPV→CS 0.223*** 0.262*** 0.118 -0.081*** Direct 0.166*** Mediation 0.149*** Indirect 0.005 (NS) Lower Band: -0.009 Upper Band: 0.036 No Mediation No Mediation *** Significant (p < 0.001). them more benefits than expenditure, the customers become happy The customers assess how much benefits they are getting using this electronic over paying such amount. The fourth Hypothesis was regarding a significant relationship between product quality and perceived value, and it was insignificant statistically (hypothesis 4). This finding is rare that product quality does not affect value perception. It is due to the perception of Bangladeshi customers like electronics products will meet their needs as usual. Product quality, its functionality, durability and usefulness are common characteristics. They pay money and hope that product will function properly. Therefore, their value perception is not affected. The fifth hypothesis, which was the relationship between service quality and perceived value, was significant. This finding is consistent with the result of Lai (2015); Thielemann et al. (2018). Customers in Bangladesh prioritize services such as installation, delivery, after-sales service, etc. to form a value about those services and products. Higher services generate a psychological attachment in the customers that is the spending is worthy. This positive feeling regarding the electronics home appliances service creates a strong perception about service. The study found that customer perceived value does not mediate the relationship between product quality and customer satisfaction (Hypothesis 6). In customers’ beliefs, electronics products are liberally similar in quality, functionality, and features. Meeting the customers’ needs independently are sufficient as far as product and its functional quality are concerned. If the utility and household electronics appliances are safe, convenient to use, durable, and are of fashionable features (like their studies. The findings of the current study also match with the study findings by Ali and Raza (2015); Beigi et al. (2016); Chinomona et al. (2013); Kondasani and Panda (2015). Mostly, this significant finding corresponds to the result of Uddin (2013) in electronics home appliances in Bangladesh. Bangladeshi customers expect the sales personnel to demonstrate how to use, to guide regarding the utility and installation process of the electronic items at home. Moreover, customers expect to receive the after-sale service, repairing service and replacement in case of malfunctioning. As technical supports, electronic equipment or products have some guidelines to be followed for security purpose or these items to be assembled, or fixed at home. A quick, smooth and passionate support and service in setting, installation and repairing matter a lot. If these services are useful, customers are likely to be highly satisfied. Therefore, quality (timely, quick and practical) of service ensures customer satisfaction. According to expectancy disconfirmation theory, customer satisfaction comes from service quality. If the service of sale personnel meets the requirements of customers, it will ultimately ensure satisfaction leading to next purchase. In the third Hypothesis, customers’ perceived value was found to have a positive and significant effect on customer satisfaction. Collaboratively, the study_ results of Chen (2008); Frank and Enkawa (2007); Hu et al. (2009); Uddin and Akhter (2012) and Uddin (2013) affirmed that customers’ perceived value influences customer satisfaction significantly. Several recent findings also reflect that customer perceived value is essential for customer satisfaction (Chen and Lin, 2015; Ramseook-Munhurrun et al., 2015; Unyathanakorn and Rompho, 2014). Customer satisfaction depends, most unlikely on product quality and quality of service, and the perception of a customer. If electronics home appliances are purposeful for the customers, they will be happy and delighted. Customers compare the expectation before the usage of an electronic item such as television, fridge, washing machine, etc. to their actual experience during and post usage of those items. Practically, it means that customers assume that their spending is worthy and also_they win in this purchase. Similar to EDT theory, if purchasing and using of electronic items ensure comfort like the customer that this purchase or usage offer Table 12. Mediated (Perceived Value) moderated (Social Media) effect on SQ > CS. Level Relationship Parameter Comments Low Direct 0.181*** No Mediation Mediation 0.175*** Indirect 0.016 (NS) Lower Band: -0.001 Upper Band: 0.062 Mid Direct 0.204*** Mediation 0.177*** Indirect 0.004 (NS) Lower Band: -0.001 Upper Band: 0.064 Table 10. Usage of social media. Usage of Social Media Frequency Percentage Low 92 30.70 Medium 96 32.00 High 114 37.30 High 13 Direct 0.2466*** Mediation 0.202*** Indirect 0.019 (NS) Lower Band: 0.000 Upper Band: 0.070 No Mediation No Mediation Md.U.H. Uzir et al. Heliyon 6 (2020) e05710 relationships. The purchasers and users of electronics items in Bangladesh were the target population of the study. Findings of the study indicated that product quality and quality of service of electronic home appliance items ensure the customer satisfaction. Though perceived value does not mediate the product quality-satisfaction relationship but mediates quality of service-satisfaction relationship partially. Moreover, perceived value does not mediate these relationships at various levels of social media usage. Since social media is popular in all walks of life, online survey method was used in this study. Moreover, social media is a moderating variable in this study, therefore the authors tried their best to utilize technology. The main objective was to explore the relationship of product quality, service quality, and perceived value on customer satisfaction in connection with social media. The findings of this study are very consistent with the previous findings. Additionally, the impact of social media has also been diagnosed. Various levels of involvement in social media have a substantial impact on customer satisfaction. in colour, shape, etc.), the product ensures the customer satisfaction. Bangladeshi customers first look into the product, its functionality and durability satisfaction. On the other hand, it mediates the relationship between quality of service and customer satisfaction (Hypothesis 7). Service quality is a subjective judgement, and perceived value is also a psychological state of customers. If customers perceive that service is enough with proper delivery and installation of the electronic items, as well as services are worthy compared to their spending, these will ultimately ensure customer satisfaction and customer perceived value will enhance the relationship. Customers consider how smooth service is provided in case of installation, repairing guidelines, and after-sale service. Another issue is that many companies do not exchange sold items, or replace malfunctioned items. So, customers are very concerned while purchasing or using an electronic item. As a result, customer perceived value has an indirect effect on the quality of service and customer satisfaction. The moderating role of social media usage refers to the impact, for example, how various levels of customer involvement in social media affect customer satisfaction with product quality and services. The study found the moderating effect of social media. The usage level of social media affects the relationships between independent variables and customer satisfaction (Hypotheses 8a, 8b, and 8c). In regard to product and customer relationship (Hypothesis 8a), this relationship is significant for low-level users but insignificant for the mid-level and high-level users. Here, low level users believe in the information, reviews, comments, and recommendations of product quality. Low involved-customers in Bangladesh consider that social media is a trusted source of information. On the other hand, the customers who are highly involved in social media do not consider the message information, comments, recommendations; rather, they care about the quality of products. As regard to the relationship with the quality of service (hypothesis 8b), social media usage affects the relationship. For low and high level users of social media, this relationship between service quality and customer satisfaction is significant but insignificant for mid-level users. The message information, comments, recommendations regarding service quality of electronics home appliances are viable for lower and higher level customers; the information (found in the social media is not considerable for mid level users as regard to ensuring satisfaction with service.Similarly, low and high level users consider that the news, comments and reviews posted in the social media develop the feeling such as their investment to purchase the electronic home appliances is fruitful and satisfactory. But midlevel users are ignorant. Finally, the indirect relationships of customer perceived value between product quality and customer satisfaction and between the quality of service and customer satisfaction at various level of social media usage were insignificant. The findings showed that these two indirect (mediating role) relationships of customer perceived value are insignificant with various level of customer involvement in social media. As a result, customers are indifferent in assuming perceived value though thy are involved in social media. Usage of modern technology, especially social media, customer choice, preference and usage pattern of the product has been changed and shifted from traditional behaviour. Facebook, FB messenger, WhatsApp are mainly used in Bangladesh. Various companies have targeted these social media for a communication and advertisement platform. These companies are spending a significant amount of money for an advertisement of products and services. With one feature, i.e. sponsored advertisement (spending money for advertising their products and service) companies are targeting their audience quickly. Therefore, accessibility has increased. The level of social media usage has a moderating effect on customer satisfaction. 6.1. Implications This type of study is first in Bangladesh. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, there is hardly any study as regard to examine customer satisfaction in electronics home appliances. The findings of the study can assist the managers and decision-makers involved in national and multinational companies focusing on customer satisfaction; the components are product quality, service quality, and customer perceived value. They may concentrate on product quality, ensuring the quality of service as well as providing more benefits in comparison to price or cost of the product. 6.1.1. Managerial implications Customer and the brand of electronics home products require a successful relationship. This successful relationship lasts long once both parties attain their respective objectives. The study found the quality of electronics home appliances has a significant and positive relationship on customers satisfaction. The brand managers, the company, showroom owners, retailers, and other concerned authority may focus on developing and improving the quality. Customer assessment program, loyalty program, customer interview, and random customer selection for focus group discussion may produce some insights regarding product development. Based on the information collected from the customers and users of electronics household items, the company can offer new products with new features, shapes, models and colours. Household items not only meet the requirement but also indicate the status, choice, and taste of a family. Electronics products sometimes can be some causes of dangers due to blast, short-circuit, firing, etc. Therefore, product safety is also a concern of the customers. The company and brand (especially local companies and local brands) can form a customer panel and expert panel to address these developments and difficulties. According to their opinions, new products can be introduced in the market. This initiative may increase the satisfaction of customers and users of electronics home appliances. Similarly, the quality of after-sale service has a significant impact on satisfaction. The electronics home appliance needs some services during and post-selling stages. Delivery service is essential in regard to large home appliances such as fridge, air conditioners, large TV, etc. The company can arrange instant delivery service so that sooner the customer purchases an item, it can be delivered. Customers usually do not want to wait after purchasing (paying bills). The prompt service may delight the customers. Similarly, the installation service is also significant issue. Technicians should be ready to move with the product or immediately after the delivery of the product at the customer’s point. Smooth technical installation services, instruction on usage may increase the image of the company, ensuring customer satisfaction. Company and showroom owners can ensure the availability of technical team for these mentioned services (expert team with carrying van). 6. Conclusion and recommendations The study attempted to examine the relationship between product quality, service quality with customer satisfaction, and how customers’ perceived value mediates and social media moderates these 14 Md.U.H. Uzir et al. Heliyon 6 (2020) e05710 marketing research. b. Only product quality, quality of service, customers’ perceived value and social media are not sufficient to explain customer satisfaction of electronics home appliances. Some other variables such as price, brand image, customer experiences, brand knowledge, verbal recommendation, and country of origin might lead to a better understanding. Similarly, the different associations can be integrated into the research model. Judgmental sampling technique is not proper technique to select the appropriate respondents. Other sampling techniques may even be tried for better output. The intercept sampling method can be appropriate in this regard to collect data from respondents at a particular time, particular day of the week. Once their perception of this comparison between expectation and benefit is positive there is a strong possibility to be loyal to the brand. In relation to electronics home appliances, this comparison and perception exist to a large extent. Therefore, with continuous product development, the company should a strategy to judge customer perception. Management can offer assessment program for the customers, can form online customer group or community or can arrange or set compliant boxes in showrooms, display centers or provide an e-mail address to put their opinions, comments, assessments or recommendations, etc. Management can offer assessment program for the customers, can form online customer group or community, can arrange or set compliant boxes in showrooms, display centers or provide an e-mail address to put their opinions, comments, assessments or recommendations The practicing managers can select some customers and select some customers and consider their own opinions as well as their friends and family members on regular basis. Marketing managers consider the marketing research data of customer satisfaction, trust, and related information that reflect the brand’s components. The practicing managers should consider these issues in their daily, monthly and yearly plan. As social media and its usage strengthen the customer brand and customer relationship, the companies can focus on social media. They may launch company’s online account (e.g., Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn) wherein they can share company, brand and product information. They may maintain a cat’s eye on social media. Any false propaganda and news should be under company consideration and necessary actions should be taken to resolve those issues. Press news, social media advertisement can be fruitful in this regard. 6.2.1. Future directions Prospective researchers on this type of study can focus on other constructs such as price, brand image, customer experiences, brand knowledge, word of mouth, and country of origin. Further research can also be done on a specific home appliance such only tv, or fridge, or washing machine or air conditioners. Declarations Author contribution statement MD U.H. Uzir: Conceived and designed the experiments; Performed the experiments; Analyzed and interpreted the data; Contributed reagents, materials, analysis tools or data; Wrote the paper. I. Jerin: Conceived and designed the experiments. H. Al Halbusi: Performed the experiments; Analyzed and interpreted the data. A.B.A. Hamid: Conceived and designed the experiments; Wrote the paper. A.S.A. Latiff: Contributed reagents, materials, analysis tools or data; Wrote the paper. 6.1.2. Theoretical implications Many researchers might want to replicate the study in other countries and cultural contexts, for example, a large population in a developing country. This study findings can contribute in several ways to the current body of knowledge in the context of slow-moving consumer durables. The findings may also add contribution by supporting the assumption that is expectation disconfirmation theory (EDT). The constructs-product quality and quality of service considering the indirect effect of customer perceived and interaction effect of usage level of social media can contribute to the literature of electronics home appliances, brand loyalty and customer satisfaction. This study is possibly the first one on electronics home appliances where customer satisfaction was examined with social media usage in the Bangladeshi context. It added a knowledgeview in EDT theory in this context such way: use of second-generation statistical tools (SEM-AMOS). Investigating the usage of social in this context, especially, in physical products context is a milestone. Previously, service quality and its five or six dimensions were used; the authors of the current study used quality of service in the form of delivery service; besides installation service and other after-sale service were brought into this model. Social media usage and its moderation in mediating relationship are also a contributing aspects for the literature. The findings generalize many developing countries where the population is large as well as income and education level are not that high. Funding statement This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. Data availability statement Data will be made available on request. Declaration of interests statement The authors declare no conflict of interest. Additional information No additional information is available for this paper. References 6.2. Limitations and areas for future research Aaker, D.A., 1991. Managing Brand Equity: Capitalizing on the Value of a Brand Name, 28. The Free Press, New York, NY. Aaker, D.A., 1996. Measuring brand equity across products and markets. Calif. Manag. Rev. 38 (3), 102–120. Abdollahi, A., Talib, M.A., 2015. Emotional intelligence as a mediator between rumination and suicidal ideation among depressed inpatients: the moderating role of suicidal history. Psychiatr. Res. 228 (3), 591–597. ADB, 2020. Bangladesh and Asian Development Bank. Retrieved May 20, 2020, 2020, from. https://www.adb.org/countries/bangladesh/poverty. Agarwal, S., Teas, R.K., 2002. Cross-national applicability of a perceived quality model. J. Prod. Brand Manag. 11 (4), 213–236. Agnihothri, S., Sivasubramaniam, N., Simmons, D., 2002. Leveraging technology to improve field service. Int. J. Serv. Ind. Manag. 13 (1), 47–68. Al Halbusi, H., Jimenez Estevez, P., Eleen, T., Ramayah, T., Hossain Uzir, M.U., 2020. The roles of the physical environment, social servicescape, Co-created value, and customer satisfaction in determining tourists’ citizenship behavior: Malaysian cultural and creative industries. Sustainability 12 (8), 3229. The study targeted only electronics household items within household usage in Bangladesh. The authors used judgmental sampling technique to reach the respondents through social media. Many of them could not be accessed. The current study adopted only three independent variables such as product quality, quality of service and perceived value. Other researchers can focus on other constructs such as brand image, product price, advertisement, and etc. Unlike other studies, the present study has few limitations such as a. the sample size might be large (more than 300 respondents). Only 300 customers or users may not represent an unknown population and marketing context. A large sample can be more suitable representative of the population; in this way, the study findings can be generalized in 15 Md.U.H. Uzir et al. Heliyon 6 (2020) e05710 Chinomona, R., Mahlangu, D., Pooe, D., 2013. Brand service quality, satisfaction, trust and preference as predictors of consumer brand loyalty in the retailing industry. Mediterr. J. Soc. Sci. 4 (14), 181–190. Chitty, B., Ward, S., Chua, C., 2007. An application of the ECSI model as a predictor of satisfaction and loyalty for backpacker hostels. Market. Intell. Plann. 25 (6), 563–580. Cho, H.J., Pucik, V., 2005. Relationship between innovativeness, quality, growth, profitability, and market value. Strat. Manag. J. 26 (6), 555–575. Coulter, K.S., Bruhn, M., Schoenmueller, V., Sch€afer, D.B., 2012. Are social media replacing traditional media in terms of brand equity creation? Manag. Res. Rev. 35 (9), 770–790. Cronin, J.J., Taylor, S.A., 1992. Measuring service quality: a reexamination and extension. J. Market. 56 (3), 55–68. Cronin, J.J.J., Brady, M.K., Hult, G.T.M., 2000. Assessing the effects of quality, value, and customer satisfaction on consumer behavioral intentions in service environments. J. Retailing 76 (2), 193–218. Crosby, L.A., Stephens, N., 1987. Effects of relationship marketing on satisfaction, retention, and prices in the life insurance industry”, Journal of marketing research,. Springer, pp. 404–411. DataBD, 2020. Consumer Electronics. https://databd.co/profiles/industries/profile-cons umer-electronics. (Accessed 20 May 2020). Dhar, R.L., 2015. Service quality and the training of employees: the mediating role of organizational commitment. Tourism Manag. 46, 419–430. Eberl, M., 2010. An Application of PLS in Multi-Group Analysis: the Need for Differentiated Corporate-Level Marketing in the mobile Communications Industry Handbook of Partial Least Squares. Springer, pp. 487–514. Edward, M., Sahadev, S., 2011. Role of switching costs in the service quality, perceived value, customer satisfaction and customer retention linkage. Asia Pac. J. Market. Logist. 23 (3), 327–345. Eggert, A., Ulaga, W., 2002. Customer perceived value: a substitute for satisfaction in business markets? J. Bus. Ind. Market. 17 (2/3), 107–118. Ehsani, Z., Ehsani, M.H., 2015. Effect of quality and price on customer satisfaction and commitment in Iran auto industry. Int. J. Service Sci. Manag.Eng. 1 (5), 52. El-Adly, M.I., 2019. Modelling the relationship between hotel perceived value, customer satisfaction, and customer loyalty. J. Retailing Consum. Serv. 50, 322–332. Evanschitzky, H., Eisend, M., Calantone, R.J., Jiang, Y., 2012. Success factors of product innovation: an updated meta-analysis. J. Prod. Innovat. Manag. 29, 21–37. Fang, B., Ye, Q., Kucukusta, D., Law, R., 2016. Analysis of the perceived value of online tourism reviews: influence of readability and reviewer characteristics. Tourism Manag. 52, 498–506. Faullant, R., Matzler, K., Füller, J., 2008. The impact of satisfaction and image on loyalty: the case of Alpine ski resorts. Manag. Serv. Qual.: Int. J. 18 (2), 163–178. Fazal, O., Kanwal, S., 2017. Determinants of brand loyalty: a case study of asian mobile phone users. Int. J. Sci. Res. Publ. 7 (12), 181–191. Feigenbaum, A.V., 1991. Total Quality Control, third ed. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY. Feng, T., Wang, D., Lawton, A., Luo, B.N., 2019. Customer orientation and firm performance: the joint moderating effects of ethical leadership and competitive intensity. J. Bus. Res. 100, 111–121. Forker, L.B., Vickery, S.K., Droge, C.L., 1996. The contribution of quality to business performance. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 16 (8), 44–62. Fornell, C., Wernerfelt, B., 1988. A model for customer complaint management. Market. Sci. 7 (3), 287–298. Fornell, C., Johnson, M.D., Anderson, E.W., Cha, J., Bryant, B.E., 1996. The American customer satisfaction index: nature, purpose, and findings. J. Market. 60 (4), 7–18. Fornell, C., Rust, R.T., Dekimpe, M.G., 2010. The effect of customer satisfaction on consumer spending growth. J. Market. Res. 47 (1), 28–35. Frank, B., Enkawa, T., 2007. How economic growth affects customer satisfaction: a study from Germany. In: Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the 13th Asia Pacific Management Conference, Melbourne, Australia. Freidman, A., 2011. Freshness Updateþ Social Media¼ Happy Users. https://searchengi neland.com/freshness-update-social-media-happy-users-102880. (Accessed 10 May 2019). Gaiardelli, P., Saccani, N., Songini, L., 2007. Performance measurement systems in aftersales service: an integrated framework. Int. J. Bus. Perform. Manag. 9 (2), 145. Garvin, D.A., 1984. What does product quality really mean. Sloan Manag. Rev. 25, 25–43. Gerdt, S.-O., Wagner, E., Schewe, G., 2019. The relationship between sustainability and customer satisfaction in hospitality: an explorative investigation using eWOM as a data source. Tourism Manag. 74 (December 2018), 155–172. Ghazzawi, A., Alharbi, B., 2019. Analysis of customer complaints data using data mining techniques. Proc. Computer Sci. 163, 62–69. Gilbert, M., Watson, R.T., Ahmed, S., Asim, M., Johnson, J.A., 2007. Vulture restaurants and their role in reducing diclofenac exposure in Asian vultures. Bird. Conserv. Int. 17 (1), 63–77. Gligor, D., Gligor, N., Maloni, M., 2019. The impact of the supplier's market orientation on the customer market orientation-performance relationship. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 216, 81–93. Goffin, K., New, C., 2001. Customer support and new product development-An exploratory study. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 21 (3), 275–301. G€ ok, O., Ersoy, P., B€ orühan, G., 2019. The effect of user manual quality on customer satisfaction: the mediating effect of perceived product quality. J. Prod. Brand Manag. 28 (4), 475–488. Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E., 2010. Multivariate Data Analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C., Sarstedt, M., 2016. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications, London, UK. Ali, M., Raza, S.A., 2015. Measurement of service quality perception and customer satisfaction in Islamic banks of Pakistan: evidence from modified Servqual model. Alteren, G., Tudoran, A.A., 2016. Enhancing export performance: betting on customer orientation, behavioral commitment, and communication. Int. Bus. Rev. 25 (1), 370–381. Anderson, R.E., 1973. Consumer dissatisfaction: the effect of disconfirmed expectancy on perceived product performance. J. Market. Res. 10 (1), 38–44. Anderson, E.W., Sullivan, M.W., 1993. The antecedents and consequences of customer satisfaction for firms. Market. Sci. 12 (2), 125–143. Ayo, C.K., Oni, A.A., Adewoye, O.J., Eweoya, I.O., 2016. E-banking users’ behaviour: eservice quality, attitude, and customer satisfaction. Int. J. Bank Market. 34 (3), 347–367. Bagozzi, R.P., Yi, Y., Phillips, L.W., 1991. Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Adm. Sci. Q. 36 (3), 421–458. Balakrishnan, R., Mitra, M., Bapna, A., 2013. ‘Korea’s Competing Chaebols: How Samsung and LG Are Finding Their Way in India. The Economic Times. Retrieved from. http:// articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2013-10-09/news/42864123_1_lg-india-m arket-share-indian-consumer-durablesindustry. Bangladesh: The Surging Consumer Market Nobody Saw Coming Retrieved January, 2020, 2020,from, Consulting Group, Boston, 2015. https://www.bcg.com/publicatio ns/2015/bangladesh-the-surging-consumer-market-nobody-saw-coming.aspx. Baron, R.M., Kenny, D.A., 1986. The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 51 (6), 1173–1182. Begum, F.A., Zami, T., 2018. Domestic Electrical and Electronics Products Gaining Consumer Confidence. Financial Express. Retrieved from. https://thefinancialexpress .com.bd/views/domestic-electrical-and-electronics-products-gaining-consumer-co nfidence-1526224882. Bei, L.-T., Chiao, Y.-C., 2006. The determinants of customer loyalty: an analysis of intangible factors in three service industries. Int. J. Commer. Manag. 16 (3/4), 162–177. Beigi, A.N.M., Jorfi, S., Tajarrod, R.S., Beigi, H.M., 2016. The study of the effects of Ebanking services quality on customers' satisfaction and loyalty (case study: agricultural bank of Khuzestan province). J. Curr. Res. Sci. (1), 375–381. Belwal, R., Amireh, M., 2018. Service quality and attitudinal loyalty: consumers’ perception of two major telecommunication companies in Oman. Arab Econom. Business J. 13 (2), 197–208. Beneke, J., Flynn, R., Greig, T., Mukaiwa, M., 2013. The influence of perceived product quality, relative price and risk on customer value and willingness to buy: a study of private label merchandise. J. Prod. Brand Manag. 22 (3), 218–228. Berraies, S., Yahia, K.B., Hannachi, M., 2017. Identifying the effects of perceived values of mobile banking applications on customers. Int. J. Bank Market. Bettman, J.R., Luce, M.F., Payne, J.W., 1998. Constructive consumer choice processes. J. Consum. Res. 25 (3), 187–217. Bolton, R.N., Drew, J.H., 1991. A multistage model of customers' assessments of service quality and value. J. Consum. Res. 17 (4), 375–384. Boshoff, C., 1999. RECOVSAT: an instrument to measure satisfaction with transactionspecific service recovery. J. Serv. Res. 1 (3), 236–249. Brady, M.K., Robertson, C.J., 1999. An exploratory study of service value in the USA and Ecuador. Int. J. Serv. Ind. Manag. 10 (5), 469–486. Brito, M., 2011. Smart Business, Social Business: A Playbook for Social media in Your Organization. Pearson Education, Indiana, USA. Brunsø, K., Bredahl, L., Grunert, K.G., Scholderer, J., 2005. Consumer perception of the quality of beef resulting from various fattening regimes. Livest. Prod. Sci. 94 (1-2), 83–93. Butz, J.H.E., Goodstein, L.D., 1996. Measuring customer value: gaining the strategic advantage. Organ. Dynam. 24 (3), 63–77. Byrne, B.M., 2013. Structural Equation Modeling with Mplus: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. Routledge, New York, NY. Calantone, R., Knight, G., 2000. The critical role of product quality in the international performance of industrial firms. Ind. Market. Manag. 29 (6), 493–506. Campbell, D.T., Stanley, J.C., 2015. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Ravenio Books. Carroll, J., Howard, S., Peck, J., Murphy, J., 2002. A field study of perceptions and use of mobile telephones by 16 to 22 year olds. J. Inf. Technol. Theor. Appl. 4 (2), 49–61. Chen, C.-F., 2008. Investigating structural relationships between service quality, perceived value, satisfaction, and behavioral intentions for air passengers: evidence from Taiwan. Transport. Res. Pol. Pract. 42 (4), 709–717. Chen, Z., Dubinsky, A.J., 2003. A conceptual model of perceived customer value in ecommerce: a preliminary investigation. Psychol. Market. 20 (4), 323–347. Chen, P.-T., Hu, H.-H., 2010. How determinant attributes of service quality influence customer-perceived value: an empirical investigation of the Australian coffee outlet industry. Int. J. Contemp. Hospit. Manag. 22 (4), 535–551. Chen, S.-C., Lin, C.-P., 2015. The impact of customer experience and perceived value on sustainable social relationship in blogs: an empirical study. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 96, 40–50. Chen, S.-C., Lin, C.-P., 2019. Understanding the effect of social media marketing activities: the mediation of social identification, perceived value, and satisfaction. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 140, 22–32. Cheung, F.Y.M., To, W.M., 2016. A customer-dominant logic on service recovery and customer satisfaction. Manag. Decis. 54 (10), 2524–2543. Chicu, D., del Mar P amies, M., Ryan, G., Cross, C., 2019. Exploring the influence of the human factor on customer satisfaction in call centres. BRQ Business Research Quarterly 22 (2), 83–95. 16 Md.U.H. Uzir et al. Heliyon 6 (2020) e05710 Kim, W.-H., Cho, J.-L., Kim, K.-S., 2019. The relationships of wine promotion, customer satisfaction, and behavioral intention: the moderating roles of customers' gender and age. J. Hospit. Tourism Manag. 39 (October 2018), 212–218. Kline, R.B., 2010. Promise and pitfalls of structural equation modeling in gifted research. In: Thompson, B., Subotnik, R.F. (Eds.), Methodologies for Conducting Research on Giftedness. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 147–169. Kline, R.B., 2015. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, fourth ed. Guilford Publications, New York, NY. Kondasani, R.K.R., Panda, R.K., 2015. Customer perceived service quality, satisfaction and loyalty in Indian private healthcare. Int. J. Health Care Qual. Assur. 28 (5), 452–467. Kondou, T., 1999. Service Marketing. Society Economic Publisher, Tokyo. Korgaonkar, P.K., Moschis, G.P., 1982. An experimental study of cognitive dissonance, product involvement, expectations, performance and consumer judgement of product performance. J. Advert. 11 (3), 32–44. Kotler, B.P., 1997. Patch use by gerbils in a risky environment: manipulating food and safety to test four models. Oikos 274–282. Kotler, P., 2017. Philip Kotler: some of my adventures in marketing. J. Historical Res. Market. 9 (2), 203–208. Kotler, P., Armstrong, G., 1999. Principles Ofmarketing. Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River. Kotler, P., Armstrong, G.M., 2018. Marketing Mix: Selected Chapters from: Principles of Marketing, Philip Kotler and Gary Armstrong. Pearson, New Jersey, USA. Koyuncu, M.J., Burke, R., Astakhova, M., Eren, D., Cetin, H., 2014. Servant leadership and perceptions of service quality provided by front-line service workers in hotels in Turkey: achieving competitive advantage. Int. J. Contemp. Hospit. Manag. 26 (7), 1083–1099. Kumar, B., 2012. Theory of Planned Behaviour Approach to Understand the Purchasing Behaviour for Environmentally Sustainable Products. Lai, I.K., 2015. The roles of value, satisfaction, and commitment in the effect of service quality on customer loyalty in Hong Kong–style tea restaurants. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly 56 (1), 118–138. Lai, F., Griffin, M., Babin, B.J., 2009. How quality, value, image, and satisfaction create loyalty at a Chinese telecom. J. Bus. Res. 62 (10), 980–986. Lakhal, L., Pasin, F., 2008. The direct and indirect impact of product quality on financial performance: a causal model. Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excel. 19 (10), 1087–1099. Lang, B., 2010. Ipsos OTX Study: People Spend More than Half Their Day Consuming media. The Wrap, pp. 1755–1767. Laroche, M., Habibi, M.R., Richard, M.-O., Sankaranarayanan, R., 2012. The effects of social media based brand communities on brand community markers, value creation practices, brand trust and brand loyalty. Comput. Hum. Behav. 28 (5), 1755–1767. Lau, T., Cheung, M.L., Pires, G.D., Chan, C., 2019. Customer satisfaction with sommelier services of upscale Chinese restaurants in Hong Kong. Int. J. Wine Bus. Res. Lele, M.M., Karmarkar, U.S., 1983. Good product support is smart marketing. Harv. Bus. Rev. 61 (6), 124–132. Leung, X.Y., Sun, J., Bai, B., 2019. Thematic framework of social media research: state of the art. Tourism Rev. 74 (3), 517–531. Lin, Y., Liang, B., Zhu, X., 2018. The effect of inventory performance on product quality: the mediating effect of financial performance. Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag. 35 (10), 2227–2247. Liu, Y., Jang, S.S., 2009. Perceptions of Chinese restaurants in the US: what affects customer satisfaction and behavioral intentions? Int. J. Hospit. Manag. 28 (3), 338–348. Lobo, W., 2016. To Investigate Customer’s Perception on Brand Loyalty for Household Appliances in Mumbai, India (Masters). National College of Ireland, Dublin. Loomba, A.P., 1998. Product distribution and service support strategy linkages: an empirical validation. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 28 (2), 143–161. Lovelock, C.H., 2000. Service Marketing, fourth ed. Prentice Hall International, New Jersey: Prentice Hall International. Lukasik, M., Bontcheva, K., Cohn, T., Zubiaga, A., Liakata, M., Procter, R., 2019. Gaussian processes for rumour stance classification in social media. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 37 (2), 1–24. Lukito, L.P., Yustini, R., 2019. The mediation effect of customer perceived value and Attitude Toward advertisement on social media influencer’s credibility on purchase intention. J. Manag.Bus. Environ. 1 (1), 36–60. Malik, S.U., 2012. Customer satisfaction, perceived service quality and mediating role of perceived value. Int. J. Market. Stud. 4 (1), 69–76. Mangold, W.G., Faulds, D.J., 2009. Social media: the new hybrid element of the promotion mix. Bus. Horiz. 52 (4), 357–365. Mannan, M., Mohiuddin, M.F., Chowdhury, N., Sarker, P., 2017. Customer satisfaction, switching intentions, perceived switching costs, and perceived alternative attractiveness in Bangladesh mobile telecommunications market. South Asian J. Business Stud. 6 (2), 142–160. Marbach, J., Lages, C.R., Nunan, D., 2016. Who are you and what do you value? Investigating the role of personality traits and customer-perceived value in online customer engagement. J. Market. Manag. 32 (5-6), 502–525. Marinkovic, V., Kalinic, Z., 2017. Antecedents of customer satisfaction in mobile commerce: exploring the moderating effect of customization. Online Inf. Rev. 41 (2), 138–154. MarketWatch, 2020. Global Home Appliance Market 2020. https://www.marketwatch.co m/press-release/global-home-appliance-market-2020-top-countries-data-revenuegrowth-development-with-covid-19-impact-analysis-and-emerging-technologie s-with-forecast-to-2024-2020-08-13. (Accessed 25 September 2020). Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M., Thiele, K.O., 2017a. Mirror, mirror on the wall: a comparative evaluation of composite-based structural equation modeling methods. J. Acad. Market. Sci. 45 (5), 616–632. Hair, J.J.F., Babin, B.J., Krey, N., 2017b. Covariance-based structural equation modeling in the Journal of Advertising: review and recommendations. J. Advert. 46 (1), 163–177. Hall, A., Towers, N., Shaw, D.R., 2017. Understanding how Millennial shoppers decide what to buy. Int. J. Retail Distrib. Manag. 45 (5), 498–517. Halstead, D., Hartman, D., Schmidt, S.L., 1994. Multisource effects on the satisfaction formation process. J. Acad. Market. Sci. 22 (2), 114–129. Hamzah, A.A., Shamsudin, M.F., 2020. Why customer satisfaction is important to business? J. Undergraduate Soc. Sci. Technol. 2 (1). Hamzah, M.I., Othman, A.K., Hassan, F., 2016. Moderating role of customer orientation on the link between market oriented behaviors and proactive service performance among relationship managers in the business banking industry. Proc. Soc. Behav. Sci. 224 (August 2015), 109–116. Hankinson, G., Cowking, P., 1996. The Reality of Global Brands: Cases and Strategies for the Successful Management of International Brands. Mcgraw-Hill Book, London. Hanna, R., Rohm, A., Crittenden, V.L., 2011. We’re all connected: the power of the social media ecosystem. Bus. Horiz. 54 (3), 265–273. Hanzaee, K.H., Yazad, R.M., 2010. The impact of brand class, brand awareness and price on important comsumer behavior factors; customer value, and behavioral intentions. Afr. J. Bus. Manag. 4 (17), 3775–3784. Hassan, S., Shamsudin, M.F., 2019. Measuring the effect of service quality and corporate image on student satisfaction and loyalty in higher learning institutes of technical and vocational education and training. Int. J. Eng. Adv. Technol. 8 (5), 533–538. Hayan, D., Samaan, A.-M., 2015. The effects of the determinants of customer satisfaction on brand loyalty. J. Res. Bus. Manag. 3 (3), 1–12. Hayes, A.F., 2009. Beyond Baron and Kenny: statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Commun. Monogr. 76 (4), 408–420. Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M., 2016. Testing measurement invariance of composites using partial least squares. Int. Market. Rev. 33 (3), 405–431. Herhausen, D., Kleinlercher, K., Verhoef, P.C., Emrich, O., Rudolph, T., 2019. Loyalty formation for different customer journey segments. J. Retailing 95 (3), 9–29. Herrington, C., Weaven, S., 2009. E-retailing by banks: e-Service quality and its importance to customer satisfaction. Eur. J. Mark. 43 (9), 1220–1231. Hirata, E., 2019. Service characteristics and customer satisfaction in the container liner shipping industry. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics 35 (1), 24–29. Hill, N., Alexander, J., 2016. Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty Measurement. Routledge, New York, NY. HofstedeInsights, 2020. COMPARE COUNTRIES. Retrieved May 2020, 2020, from. htt ps://www.hofstede-insights.com/product/compare-countries/. Howat, G., Assaker, G., 2013. The hierarchical effects of perceived quality on perceived value, satisfaction, and loyalty: empirical results from public, outdoor aquatic centres in Australia. Sport Manag. Rev. 16 (3), 268–284. Hu, T., Kettinger, W.J., 2008. Why people continue to use social networking services: developing a comprehensive model. In: Paper Presented at the ICIS 2008 Proceedings, Paris, France. Hu, H.-H., Kandampully, J., Juwaheer, T.D., 2009. Relationships and impacts of service quality, perceived value, customer satisfaction, and image: an empirical study. Serv. Ind. J. 29 (2), 111–125. Hulland, J., Baumgartner, H., Smith, K.M., 2018. Marketing survey research best practices: evidence and recommendations from a review of JAMS articles. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 46 (1), 92–108. Itani, O.S., Kassar, A.-N., Loureiro, S.M.C., 2019. Value get, value give: the relationships among perceived value, relationship quality, customer engagement, and value consciousness. Int. J. Hospit. Manag. 80, 78–90. Jackson, L.A., 2017. Women and Work Culture: Britain C. 1850–1950. Routledge, New York, NY. Jakpar, S., Goh, S., Johari, A., Myint, K., 2012. Examining the product quality attributes that influences customer satisfaction most when the price was discounted: a case study in Kuching Sarawak. Int. J. Bus. Soc. Sci. 3 (23), 221–236. Joung, H.-W., Choi, E.-K., Wang, E., 2016. Effects of perceived quality and perceived value of campus foodservice on customer satisfaction: moderating role of gender. J. Qual. Assur. Hospit. Tourism 17 (2), 101–113. Kafetzopoulos, D.P., Psomas, E.L., Gotzamani, K.D., 2015. The impact of quality management systems on the performance of manufacturing firms. Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag. 32 (4), 381–399. Kant, R., Jaiswal, D., 2017. The impact of perceived service quality dimensions on customer satisfaction: an empirical study on public sector banks in India. Int. J. Bank Market. 35 (3), 411–430. Kaura, V., Durga Prasad, C.S., Sharma, S., 2015. Service quality, service convenience, price and fairness, customer loyalty, and the mediating role of customer satisfaction. Int. J. Bank Market. 33 (4), 404–422. Keshavarz, Y., Jamshidi, D., 2018. Service quality evaluation and the mediating role of perceived value and customer satisfaction in customer loyalty. Int. J. Tourism Cities 4 (2), 220–244. Khan, A., Khan, R., 2012. Embracing new media in Fiji: the way forward for social network marketing and communication strategies. Strat. Dir. 28 (4), 3–5. Kietzmann, J.H., Hermkens, K., McCarthy, I.P., Silvestre, B.S., 2011. Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Bus. Horiz. 54 (3), 241–251. Kim, Y.H., Kim, D.J., Wachter, K., 2013. A study of mobile user engagement (MoEN): engagement motivations, perceived value, satisfaction, and continued engagement intention. Decis. Support Syst. 56, 361–370. 17 Md.U.H. Uzir et al. Heliyon 6 (2020) e05710 Quang, N., Nisar, T., Knox, D., Prabhakar, G., 2018. Understanding customer satisfaction in the UK quick service restaurant industry. Br. Food J. 120 (6), 1207–1222. Ramseook-Munhurrun, P., Seebaluck, V., Naidoo, P., 2015. Examining the structural relationships of destination image, perceived value, tourist satisfaction and loyalty: case of Mauritius. Proc. Soc. Behavior. Sci. 175, 252–259. Rao, N.R., 2019. Staying Ahead in Business through Innovation Advanced Methodologies and Technologies in Business Operations and Management. IGI Global, pp. 1404–1414. Rao, A.R., Monroe, K.B., 1989. The effect of price, brand name, and store name on buyers’ perceptions of product quality: an integrative review. J. Market. Res. 26 (3), 351–357. Rathmell, J.M., 1966. What is meant by services? J. Market. 30 (4), 32–36. Ravald, A., Gr€ onroos, C., 1996. The value concept and relationship marketing. Eur. J. Market. 30 (2), 19–30. Razak, A.A., Shamsudin, M.F., 2019. The influence of atmospheric experience on Theme Park Tourist’s satisfaction and loyalty in Malaysia. Int. J. Innovation, Creativity and Change 6 (9), 10–20. Razak, I., Nirwanto, N., Triatmanto, B., 2016. The impact of product quality and price on customer satisfaction with the mediator of customer value. IISTE: J. Market. Consumer Res. 30, 59–68. Report, F.O., 2018. Social media Users 30 Million in Bangladesh: Report, Sci-Tech. The Financial Express. Retrieved from. https://thefinancialexpress.com.bd/sci-tech/socia l-media-users-30-million-in-bangladesh-report-1521797895. ReportLinker, 2020. Global Home Appliances Market Growth. https://www.globenewsw ire.com/news-release/2020/02/01/1978432/0/en/Global-home-appliances-marketis-expected-to-grow-with-a-CAGR-of-2-8-over-the-forecast-period-from-2019-2025.h tml. (Accessed 25 September 2020). Rigopoulou, I.D., Chaniotakis, I.E., Lymperopoulos, C., Siomkos, G.I., 2008. After-sales service quality as an antecedent of customer satisfaction. Manag. Serv. Qual.: Int. J. 18 (5), 512–527. Rita, P., Oliveira, T., Farisa, A., 2019. The impact of e-service quality and customer satisfaction on customer behavior in online shopping. Heliyon 5 (10), e02690. Russell, R.S., Taylor, B.W., 2006. Operation Management: Quality and Competitiveness in a Global Environment, fifth ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New Jersey. Ruyter, D.K., Bloemer, J., 1999. Customer loyalty in extended service settings: the interaction between satisfaction, value attainment and positive mood. Int. J. Serv. Ind. Manag. 10 (3), 320–336. Ryu, K., Han, H., 2010. Influence of the quality of food, service, and physical environment on customer satisfaction and behavioral intention in quick-casual restaurants: moderating role of perceived price. J. Hospit. Tourism Res. 34 (3), 310–329. Ryu, K., Jang, S., 2008. DINESCAPE: a scale for customers' perception of dining environments. J. Foodserv. Bus. Res. 11 (1), 2–22. Sabiote-Ortiz, C.M., Frías-Jamilena, D.M., Casta~ neda-García, J.A., 2016. Overall perceived value of a tourism service delivered via different media: a cross-cultural perspective. J. Trav. Res. 55 (1), 34–51. Sampaio, C.H., Ladeira, W.J., Santini, F.D.O., 2017. Apps for mobile banking and customer satisfaction: a cross-cultural study. Int. J. Bank Market. 35 (7), 1133–1153. Santouridis, I., Trivellas, P., 2010. Investigating the impact of service quality and customer satisfaction on customer loyalty in mobile telephony in Greece. TQM J. 22 (3), 330–343. Sashi, C., 2012. Customer engagement, buyer-seller relationships, and social media. Manag. Decis. 50 (2), 253–272. Saunders, M.N.K., Lewis, P., Thornhill, A., 2016. Research Methods for Business Students, seventh ed. Pearson Education Limited, England. Schechter, L., 1984. A normative conception of value. Progressive Grocer. Exec. Rep. 2, 12–14. Schwartz-Chassidim, H., Ayalon, O., Mendel, T., Hirschprung, R., Toch, E., 2020. Selectivity in posting on social networks: the role of privacy concerns, social capital, and technical literacy. Heliyon 6 (2), e03298. Sekaran, U., Bougie, M., 2009. Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach. John Wiley & Sons, UK. Shaharudin, M.R., Yusof, K.M.M., Elias, S.J., Mansor, S.W., 2010. Factors affecting customer satisfaction in after-sales service of Malaysian electronic business market. Can. Soc. Sci. 5 (6), 10–18. Shamsudin, M.F., Razali, N.A.M., Hassim, A.A., 2015a. Factors influencing customer loyalty in private healthcare services. Valley Int. J. 2 (10), 1622–1625. Shamsudin, M.F., Razali, N.A.M., Hassim, A.A., 2015b. Factors influencing customer loyalty in private healthcare services. Int. J. Soc. Sci. Humanities Invention 2 (10), 1622–1625. Shamsudin, M., Nurana, N., Aesya, A., Nabi, M., 2018a. Role of university reputation towards student choice to private universities. Opci on 34, 285–294. Shamsudin, M., Razak, A., Salem, M., 2018b. The role of customer interactions towards customer satisfaction in theme parks experience. Opci on 34 (Special Issue), 546–558. Shamsudin, M., Esa, S., Ali, A., 2019a. Determinants of customer loyalty towards the hotel industry in Malaysia. Int. J. Innovation, Creativity and Change 6 (9), 21–29. Shamsudin, M.F., Ali, A.M., Ab Wahid, R., Saidun, Z., 2019b. Factors influence undergraduate students’decision making to enroll and social media application as an external factor. Humanities Soc. Sci. Rev. 7 (1), 126–136. Shi, Y., Prentice, C., He, W., 2014. Linking service quality, customer satisfaction and loyalty in casinos, does membership matter? Int. J. Hospit. Manag. 40, 81–91. Shukla, P., 2004. Effect of product usage, satisfaction and involvement on brand switching behaviour. Asia Pac. J. Market. Logist. 16 (4), 82–104. Simmons, I.G., 2001. An Environmental History of Great Britain: from 10,000 Years Ago to the Present. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh. Skogland, I., Siguaw, J.A., 2004. Are your satisfied customers loyal? Cornell Hotel Restaur. Adm. Q. 45 (3), 221–234. Martínez-Costa, M., Choi, T.Y., Martínez, J.A., Martínez-Lorente, A.R., 2009. ISO 9000/ 1994, ISO 9001/2000 and TQM: the performance debate revisited. J. Oper. Manag. 27 (6), 495–511. McArthur, J., 2016. 6 Ways on How Technology Has Made Our Life Easier. https:// www.engadget.com/2016/10/17/6-ways-on-how-technology-has-made-our-life-ea sier/. (Accessed 17 June 2019). McBain, H., 1944. Are customers always right. Rotarian 32–33. McDougall, G.H., Levesque, T., 2000. Customer satisfaction with services: putting perceived value into the equation. J. Serv. Market. 14 (5), 392–410. Memon, M.A., Ting, H., Ramayah, T., Chuah, F., Cheah, J.H., 2017. A review of the methodological misconceptions and guidelines related to the application of structural equation modeling: a Malaysian scenario. J. Appl. Struct. Equ. Modeling 1 (1), 1–13. Minh, N.H., Ha, N.T., Anh, P.C., Matsui, Y., 2015. Service quality and customer satisfaction: a case study of hotel industry in Vietnam. Asian Soc. Sci. 11 (10), 73. Mirmehdi, S.M., Sanayei, A., Dolatabadi, H.R., 2017. Structural equation modelling of customer attitudes towards social network advertising: a case of Iranian social networking site. Int. J. Bus. Excel. 12 (4), 469–488. Mittal, V., Kamakura, W.A., 2001. Satisfaction, repurchase intent, and repurchase behavior: investigating the moderating effect of customer characteristics. J. Market. Res. 38 (1), 131–142. Moghavvemi, S., Lee, S.T., Lee, S.P., 2018. Perceived overall service quality and customer satisfaction. Int. J. Bank Market. Molina Castillo, F.J., Calantone, R.J., Stanko, M.A., Munuera-Aleman, J.L., 2013. Product quality as a formative index: evaluating an alternative measurement approach. J. Prod. Innovat. Manag. 30 (2), 380–398. Moorthy, K., Chun T’ing, L., Ai Na, S., Tze Ching, C., Yuin Loong, L., Sze Xian, L., Wei Ling, T., 2018. Corporate image no longer leads to customer satisfaction and loyalty: a Malaysian perspective. Int. J. Law Manag. 60 (4), 934–952. Morgan, N.A., Vorhies, D.W., 2001. Product quality alignment and business unit performance. J. Prod. Innovat. Manag.: An Int. Publ. Product Dev. Manag. Assoc. 18 (6), 396–407. Morra, M.C., Ceruti, F., Chierici, R., Di Gregorio, A., 2018. Social vs traditional media communication: brand origin associations strike a chord. J. Res. Indian Med. 12 (1), 2–21. Murali, S., Pugazhendhi, S., Muralidharan, C., 2016. Modelling and investigating the relationship of after sales service quality with customer satisfaction, retention and loyalty–a case study of home appliances business. J. Retailing Consum. Serv. 30 (May 2016), 67–83. NapoleonCat, 2020. Social media users in Bangladesh. https://napoleoncat.com/stats /social-media-users-in-bangladesh/2020/03. (Accessed 15 May 2020). Nitzl, C., 2016. The use of partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) in management accounting research: directions for future theory development. J. Account. Lit. 37, 19–35. Nunan, D., Di Domenico, M., 2019. Older consumers, digital marketing, and public policy: a review and research agenda. J. Public Policy Mark. 38 (4), 469–483. O'Dwyer, M., Gilmore, A., 2018. Value and alliance capability and the formation of strategic alliances in SMEs: the impact of customer orientation and resource optimisation. J. Bus. Res. 87, 58–68. Oh, H., 1999. Service quality, customer satisfaction, and customer value: a holistic perspective. Int. J. Hospit. Manag. 18 (1), 67–82. Oh, H., Kim, K., 2017. Customer satisfaction, service quality, and customer value: years 2000-2015. Int. J. Contemp. Hospit. Manag. 29 (1), 2–29. Oliver, R.L., 1977. Effect of expectation and disconfirmation on postexposure product evaluations: an alternative interpretation. J. Appl. Psychol. 62 (4), 480. Oliver, R.L., 1980. A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. J. Market. Res. 17 (4), 460–469. Oliver, R.L., 1997. Satisfaction: A Behavioral Perspective on the Consumer. IrwinMcGraw-Hill, New York, NY. Olorunniwo, F., Hsu, M.K., Udo, G.J., 2006. Service quality, customer satisfaction, and behavioral intentions in the service factory. J. Serv. Market. 20 (1), 59–72. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A., Berry, L.L., 1985. A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. J. Market. 49 (4), 41–50. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A., Berry, L.L., 1996. The behavioral consequences of service quality. J. Market. 60 (2), 31–46. Peng, L., Zhang, W., Wang, X., Liang, S., 2019. Moderating effects of time pressure on the relationship between perceived value and purchase intention in social E-commerce sales promotion: considering the impact of product involvement. Inf. Manag. 56 (2), 317–328. Philip, K., Hermanwan, K., Den Huan, H., 2016. Marketing for Competitiveness: Asia to the World-In the Age of Digital Consumers. World Scientific. Pizam, A., Shapoval, V., Ellis, T., 2016. Customer satisfaction and its measurement in hospitality enterprises: a revisit and update. Int. J. Contemp. Hospit. Manag. 28 (1), 2–35. Podsakoff, P.M., Organ, D.W., 1986. Self-reports in organizational research: problems and prospects. J. Manag. 12 (4), 531–544. Prajogo, D.I., Sohal, A.S., 2004. The multidimensionality of TQM practices in determining quality and innovation performance—an empirical examination. Technovation 24 (6), 443–453. Prakash, A., Jha, S.K., Prasad, K.D., Singh, A.K., 2017. Productivity, quality and business performance: an empirical study. Int. J. Prod. Perform. Manag. 66 (1), 78–91. Preacher, K.J., Hayes, A.F., 2008. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav. Res. Methods 40 (3), 879–891. Prebensen, N.K., Xie, J., 2017. Efficacy of co-creation and mastering on perceived value and satisfaction in tourists' consumption. Tourism Manag. 60, 166–176. 18 Md.U.H. Uzir et al. Heliyon 6 (2020) e05710 Uzir, M.U.H., Nimfa, D.T., Lawal, I.T., Hamid, A.B.A., Latiff, A.S.A., Wahab, S.A., 2020. Does service quality ensure customer satisfaction in Mr bigg’s, Nigeria? Interciencia J. 45 (2), 285–325. Valliant, R., Dever, J.A., 2018. Survey Weights: a Step-by-step Guide to Calculation. Stata Press College, Station, TX. van Riel, A.C., Pura, M., 2005. Linking perceived value and loyalty in location based mobile services. Manag. Serv. Qual.: Int. J. 15 (6), 509–538. Vandermerwe, S., 2003. Customer-minded growth through services. Manag. Serv. Qual.: Int. J. 13 (4), 262–266. Veloutsou, C., 2015. Brand evaluation, satisfaction and trust as predictors of brand loyalty: the mediator-moderator effect of brand relationships. J. Consum. Market. Vera, J., 2015. Perceived brand quality as a way to superior customer perceived value crossing by moderating effects. J. Prod. Brand Manag. 24 (2), 147–156. Verhoef, P.C., Lemon, K.N., 2013. Successful customer value management: key lessons and emerging trends. Eur. Manag. J. 31 (1), 1–15. Villarroel, O.F., Grewal, D., Ludwig, S., Ruyter, K.D., Mahr, D., Wetzels, M., 2019. Cutting through content clutter: how speech and image acts drive consumer sharing of social media brand messages. J. Consum. Res. 45 (5), 988–1012. Vitasek, K., 2005. Supply Chain & Logistics Terms and Glossary, Supply Chain Vision. Belevue, WA. Wang, E.S.-T., Tsai, B.-K., Chen, T.-L., Chang, S.-C., 2012. The influence of emotions displayed and personal selling on customer behaviour intention. Serv. Ind. J. 32 (3), 353–366. Walls, A.R., 2013. A cross-sectional examination of hotel consumer experience and relative effects on consumer values. Int. J. Hospit. Manag. 32, 179–192. Webb, H., Burnap, P., Procter, R., Rana, O., Stahl, B.C., Williams, M., Jirotka, M., 2016. Digital wildfires: propagation, verification, regulation, and responsible innovation. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 34 (3), 1–23. Williams, J., MacKinnon, D.P., 2008. Resampling and distribution of the product methods for testing indirect effects in complex models. Struct. Equ. Model.: a multidisciplinary journal 15 (1), 23–51. Wu, J.H.-C., Lin, Y.-C., Hsu, F.-S., 2011. An empirical analysis of synthesizing the effects of service quality, perceived value, corporate image and customer satisfaction on behavioral intentions in the transport industry: a case of Taiwan high-speed rail. Innovat. Market. 7 (3), 83–100. Yang, H., Yu, J., Zo, H., Choi, M., 2016. User acceptance of wearable devices: an extended perspective of perceived value. Telematics Inf. 33 (2), 256–269. Yi, Y., 1990. A critical review of consumer satisfaction. Rev. Market. 4 (1), 68–123. Yi, Y., Nataraajan, R., 2018. Customer satisfaction in asia. Psychol. Market. 35 (6), 387–391. Yu, X., Yuan, C., 2019. How consumers’ brand experience in social media can improve brand perception and customer equity. Asia Pacific J. Mark. Logist. 31 (5), 1233–1251. Zameer, H., Tara, A., Kausar, U., Mohsin, A., 2015. Impact of service quality, corporate image and customer satisfaction towards customers’ perceived value in the banking sector in Pakistan. Int. J. Bank Market. 33 (4), 442–456. Zeithaml, V.A., 1988. Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence. J. Market. 52 (3), 2–22. Zeleti, F.A., Ojo, A., Curry, E., 2016. Exploring the economic value of open government data. Govern. Inf. Q. 33 (3), 535–551. Zhang, J., Zhang, J., Zhang, M., 2019. From free to paid: customer expertise and customer satisfaction on knowledge payment platforms. Decis. Support Syst. 127 (March), 113140. Slater, S.F., Narver, J.C., 2000. Intelligence generation and superior customer value. J. Acad. Market. Sci. 28 (1), 120. Statista, 2020a. Household Appliances. https://www.statista.com/outlook/256/100/h ousehold-appliances/worldwide#market-users. (Accessed 25 September 2020). Statista, 2020b. Number of Monthly Active Facebook Users Worldwide as of 1st Quarter 2020. https://www.statista.com/statistics/264810/number-of-monthly-active-fac ebook-users-worldwide/. (Accessed 20 May 2020). Sun, Sunny Li, Zhu, Jigao, Ye, Kangtao, 2015. Board openness during an economic crisis. J. Bus. Ethics 129, 363–377. Sweeney, J.C., Soutar, G.N., Johnson, L.W., 1997. Retail service quality and perceived value: a comparison of two models. J. Retailing Consum. Serv. 4 (1), 39–48. Sweeney, J.C., Soutar, G.N., Johnson, L.W., 1999. The role of perceived risk in the quality-value relationship: a study in a retail environment. J. Retailing 75 (1), 77–105. Szymanski, D.M., Henard, D.H., 2001. Customer satisfaction: a meta-analysis of the empirical evidence. J. Acad. Market. Sci. 29 (1), 16–35. Tam, J.L., 2004. Customer satisfaction, service quality and perceived value: an integrative model. J. Mark. Manag. 20 (7–8), 897–917. Tandon, U., Kiran, R., Sah, A.N., 2017. Customer satisfaction as mediator between website service quality and repurchase intention: an emerging economy case. Serv. Sci. 9 (2), 106–120. Taylor, S.A., Baker, T.L., 1994. An assessment of the relationship between service quality and customer satisfaction in the formation of consumers' purchase intentions. J. Retailing 70 (2), 163–178. Teas, R.K., Agarwal, S., 2000. The effects of extrinsic product cues on consumers’ perceptions of quality, sacrifice, and value. J. Acad. Market. Sci. 28 (2), 278–290. Tehseen, S., Ramayah, T., Sajilan, S., 2017. Testing and controlling for common method variance: a review of available methods. J. Manag. Sci. 4 (2), 142–168. Thielemann, V.M., Ottenbacher, M.C., Harrington, R.J., 2018. Antecedents and consequences of perceived customer value in the restaurant industry: a preliminary test of a holistic model. Int. Hospitality Rev. 32 (1), 26–45. Tsai, W.-H., Lin, T.W., Chen, S.-P., Hung, S.-J., 2007. Users' service quality satisfaction and performance improvement of ERP consultant selections. Int. J. Bus. Syst. Res. 1 (3), 280–301. Tseng, L.-M., 2019. How customer orientation leads to customer satisfaction: mediating mechanisms of service workers’ etiquette and creativity. Int. J. Bank Market. 37 (1), 210–225. Tung, F.-C., 2013. Customer satisfaction, perceived value and customer loyalty: the mobile services industry in China. Afr. J. Bus. Manag. 7 (18), 1730–1737. Uddin, M.B., 2013. Investigating the relationships between customer satisfaction, behavioral intentions, and customer loyalty of electronic household products. Afr. J. Manag. Res. 21 (1), 49–68. Uddin, M.B., Akhter, B., 2012. Customer satisfaction in mobile phone services in Bangladesh: a survey research. Manag. Market. J. 10 (1), 20–36. Ulaga, W., Eggert, A., 2006. Value-based differentiation in business relationships: gaining and sustaining key supplier status. J. Market. 70 (1), 119–136. Unyathanakorn, K., Rompho, N., 2014. Factors affecting customer satisfaction in online banking service. J. Market. Dev. Competitiveness 8 (2), 50–60. Uzir, M.U.H., Hamid, A.B.A., Latiff, A.S.A., 2019. Does customer satisfaction exist in purchasing and usage of Electronic Home Appliances in Bangladesh through interaction effects of Social Media? Int. J. Bus. Excel. 19