Recent Prehistoric Enclosures
and Funerary Practices in Europe
Proceedings of the International Meeting
held at the Gulbenkian Foundation
(Lisbon, Portugal, November 2012)
Edited by
António Carlos de Valera
BAR International Series 2676
2014
Published by
Archaeopress
Publishers of British Archaeological Reports
Gordon House
276 Banbury Road
Oxford OX2 7ED
England
bar@archaeopress.com
www.archaeopress.com
BAR S2676
Recent Prehistoric Enclosures and Funerary Practices in Europe: Proceedings of the International Meeting
held at the Gulbenkian Foundation (Lisbon, Portugal, November 2012)
Cover image: Magnetogram from Perdigões enclosure, by Helmut Becker (p. 52, this volume)
© Archaeopress and the individual authors 2014
ISBN 978 1 4073 1318 4
Printed in England by Information Press, Oxford
All BAR titles are available from:
Hadrian Books Ltd
122 Banbury Road
Oxford
OX2 7BP
England
www.hadrianbooks.co.uk
The current BAR catalogue with details of all titles in print, prices and means of payment is available free
from Hadrian Books or may be downloaded from www.archaeopress.com
TABLE OF CONTENTS
The times and timings of enclosures
Alasdair Whittle___________________________________________________________ p. 1
Enclosures &burial in Middle &Late Neolithic Britain
Alex Gibson______________________________________________________________ p. 13
The place of human remains anf Funerary practices in Recent Neolithic ditched and
walled enclosures in the West of France (IV-III Mill. BC)
Audrey Blanchard, Jean-Noël Guyodo, Ludovic Soler ___________________________ p. 19
Funerary practices and body manipulation at Neolithic and Chalcolithic Perdigões ditched
enclosures (South Portugal)
António Carlos Valera, Ana Maria Silva, Claudia Cunha, Lucy Shaw Evangelista ______ p. 37
Skeletons in the ditch: funerary activity in ditched enclosures of Porto Torrão (Ferreira do
Alentejo, Beja)
Filipa Rodrigues_____________________________________________________ p. 59
Enclosures and funerary practices: about an archaeology in search for the symbolic
dimension of social relations.
Susana Oliveira Jorge____ _________________________________________________ p. 71
Human Bones from Chalcolithic Walled Enclosures of Portuguese Estremadura:
The Examples of Zambujal and Leceia
Michael Kunst, João Luís Cardoso, Anna Waterman ______________________________ p. 83
Human sacrifices with cannibalistic practices in a pit enclosure? The extraordinary early
Neolithic site of Herxheim (Palatinate, Germany)
Andrea Zeeb-Lanz ________________________________________________________ p. 99
Gendered burials at an henge-like enclosure near Magdeburg, central Germany: a tale of
revenge and ritual killing?
André Spatzier Marcus Stecher, Kurt W. Alt. François Bertemes____________________ p. 111
ii
The Copper age ditched settlement at Conelle de Arcevia (Central Italy)
Alberto Cazzella, Giulia Recchia ____________________________________________ p. 129
Funerary practices in the ditched enclosures of Camino de las Yeseras: Ritual, Temporal
and Spatial Diversity
Patrícia Rios, Corina Liesau, Concepción Blasco _______________________________ p. 139
Recent Prehistory enclosures & funerary practices
José Enrique Márquez Romero, Vítor Jímenez Jaímez ___________________________ p. 149
iii
Copyright material: no unauthorized reproduction in any medium
two prominent settlement sites
es in the Estremadura region
of Portugal (Leceia and Zambu
bujal) are examined (Fig. 1)
in order to investigate how sett
ettlement burials may relate
to individual identity, and/or temporal
tem
and spatial aspects
of community life.
LITHIC
HUMAN BONES FROM CHALCOL
WALLED ENCLOSURES OF PORT
TUGUESE
ESTREMADURA:
THE EXAMPLES OF ZAMBUJAL AND
A
LECEIA.
Michael Kunst1
João Luís Cardoso2
Anna J. Waterman 3
1
Deutsches Archäologisches Institut,, Abteilung
A
Madrid,
Spain. michael.kunst@dainst.de
2
Aberta University and Centre for Archaeological
Studies,
Oeiras
Municipalit
lity,
Portugal.
cardoso18@netvisao.pt
3
Department of Natural and Applied
ed Sciences, Mount
Mercy University, Cedar Rapids,
ds, Iowa, USA.
awaterman@mtmercy.edu
1.
INTRODUCTION
The traditional view of burial prac
ractices during the
Chalcolithic period of the Iberian Pe
Peninsula was that
settlements and burial locations wer
ere geographically
distinct with burials taking place in nat
natural and artificial
caves, tholoi, and rock cut tombs some
som distance from
hilltop and valley settlements (for exa
xample Almagro &
Arribas, 1963: 19,fig. 3; Arteaga & Cr
Cruz Auñón, 1995:
590, fig. 2; Lillios et al. 2010; 2014;; M
Morán & Parreira,
2004:31, Map; Soares, 2003: 180-181;; Spindler
S
, 1981: 4,
fig. 2;). However, excavations duringg the last 20 years
show that large amounts of human ske
skeletal remains are
recovered from settlement sites suggesti
sting some diversity
in burial practices. While in Sangme
meister & Schubart
(1981:116) finds of human bones from
rom excavations at
Zambujal are mentioned, at the time of
o publication this
did not lead to an open discussion off tthe topic. In fact,
only when a burial tholoi was found
und in the ditched
settlement of Perdigões (Reguengos
gos de Monsaraz,
Portugal) (Lago et al. 1998: 60-70.
0. 75-79), and S.
Oliveira Jorge published the finds of human bones at
Castelo Velho de Freixo do Numão (V
(Vila Nova de Foz
Côa, Portugal) and used them as the starting
st
point for a
ritual interpretation of the site (Jorge 1999)
1
were human
bones and burials inside of Chalcol
colithic settlements
observed with more interest. How
owever, the real
breakthrough came some years late
ater when salvage
excavations completed in the region
ion around Madrid
found evidence of a diverse array of hum
uman burials within
Chalcolithic
settlements.
Particula
ularly
interesting
examples of this are found at the ditch
ched settlement site
of Camino de las Yeseras where arch
rchaeologists found
evidence of several complex buria
rial-structures with
collective and single graves (Blasco et al. 2009). These
new findings of diverse settlement buria
rial practices in late
prehistoric Spain have led to thee reassessment of
settlement burials at Chalcolithic sites in Portugal as well.
To this aim, in this paper human skel
eletal remains from
Fig. 1 – Location of Leceia,, Zambujal
Z
and Vila Nova
de São Pedro in the Iberian Peninsula.
Pe
2.
ZAMBUJAL
2.1Introduction.
M. Kunst – A. Watermann
The earliest evidence of huma
man bones at Zambujal was
published by E. Sangmeiste
ister and H. Schubart in
1981(Sangmeister & Schubart
art, 1981:116). Sangmeister
and Schubart discuss their find
nding of 82 human bones in
the entrance of small corridor.
r. This corridor corresponds
with the structures built during
ng period 5 and lie on top of
the destruction horizon of phase
ase 4d and the older entrance
of tower L. In 1987 Franz Parsche
Par
of the University of
Munich (Germany), with the help of his assistant,
Veronika Zaya, began a prelimi
minary examination of all of
the human remains recovered
ed from Zambujal between
1964 and 1973 and found that
th there were even more
recovered human bones from scattered
s
areas around the
site. Unfortunately, this study
dy was never completed or
published because of Parsche
che’s untimely death some
83
Copyright material: no unauthorized reproduction in any medium
years later. Additionally, in subsequ
equent excavations
between 1994 and 2007 small deposits
ts oof human remains
continued to be recovered.
walls were at that time still
till covered by earth, and
therefore at first glance appea
peared to be a huge burial
mound. On top of this mound
nd L. Trindade dug a small
test pit and showed the recov
overed artifacts to Eugénio
Jalhay, a Jesuit priest who was
as at the time excavating at
the Chalcolithic fortified settlem
tlement of Vila Nova de São
Pedro. Jalhay later published
d L.
L Trindade early finds at
Zambujal (Jalhay 1946).
Recently, a reexamination of the human
an skeletal remains
from Zambujal was undertaken for seve
veral reasons. First,
to date, a significant amount of human
an bones have been
recovered at Zambujal. Secondly, two recent research
projects analyzing human remains fr
from Chalcolithic
archaeological sites in Portugal havee reported findings
that may help to answer questions abou
out the context and
importance of the human remainss recovered from
Zambujal. At the suggestion of M. K
Kunst, Dr. Katina
Lillios of the University of Iowa begann eexcavations at the
rock shelter of Bolores, located 2 km from Zambujal.
Artifacts found during agricultural w
work at the site
suggested that Bolores was a Chalcolit
lithic burial (Kunst
& Trindade, 1990:38-41. Taf. 4-5),, and
a
in 1986, the
museum of Torres Vedras made a first
st test excavation at
the site. Lillios subsequently carried out
ou four excavation
campaigns at Bolores between 2007 and
an 2012, in which
the remains of at least 37 individuals
als were recovered
(Lillios et al. 2010, 2014). In conju
njunction with the
Bolores project, A. Waterman conduct
ucted a preliminary
comparative bioanthropological study oon a portion of the
Zambujal human remains (Waterma
man et al. 2014,
Waterman 2012), as there may be a rela
relationship between
the settlement site of Zambujal andd tthe burial site of
Bolores. The other project which pique
qued our interest in
undertaking a new examination of the
he Zambujal human
remains was an article published by Susana Oliveira
Jorge (translated by M. Kunst intoo German) on her
excavations at the settlement of Castelo
elo Velho de Freixo
de Numão, where she found some in
intriguing contexts
related to the human bones recovered
ed (Jorge, 1999:8894). Since Waterman’s initial review
iew of the human
remains from Zambujal in 2012 more
ore human remains
have been identified from faunal assem
semblages. Thus, in
this paper we will review the total numb
mber of bones found
to date.
Fig. 2 – Location of Zambuja
jal on a promontory above
the small valley of the Ribeira de Pedrulhos;
areophotograph (august 2007
007), view from northeast
(Photo:
D-DAI-M
MAD-MK-DG-25-07-777,
photographer M. Kunst).
Years later in 1959-1961 L. Trindade, and Aurélio
Ricardo Belo who was at the time the director of the
Torres Vedras museum, und
ndertook three excavation
seasons focusing on the walls
lls around the mound. Belo
died in 1961 and the excavation
tions ceased for a short time.
In 1963 Vera Leisner acqua
quainted L. Trindade with
Hermanfrid Schubart of the
he German Archaeological
Institute. L. Trindade invitedd H. Schubart to continue
with the excavations of Zambu
bujal. Thus, in 1964 a new
series of six excavation campai
paigns were started, directed
by H. Schubart of the Germann A
Archaeological Institute in
collaboration with Edward San
angmeister, then director of
the Institute of Prehistory off the
th University of Freiburg
(Germany) and L. Trindade.. They
T
excavated until 1973
and the results are published in numerous articles and a
series of monographs (Sangm
meister & Schubart, 1981;
Kunst 1987; Sangmeister & Jiménez
Jim
1995; Uerpmann &
Uerpmann 2003). Almost twen
enty years later, the town of
Torres Vedras decided to install
i
an archaeological
museum in Zambujal and to fac
facilitate this work two new
excavation campaigns, underr the
t direction of M. Kunst
and H.-P. Uerpmann, were und
ndertaken in 1994 and 1995
(Kunst & Uerpmann, 2002).
20
Additionally, in
collaboration with M. Höckk from the University of
Covilhã, topographic campaig
aigns were started (Höck,
2007) and campaigns continued
ed under the direction of M.
Kunst in 2001, 2002, 2004,, 2007
2
and 2012. The 2002
campaign was done in collabo
boration with E. Morán and
R. Parreira (Kunst, Morán & Pa
Parreira, 2013).
und.
2.2 Archaeological backgroun
The Chalcolithic settlement of Zambuj
bujal belongs to the
township of Torres Vedras (in the distri
strict of Lisbon) and
is situated south of the Torres Vedras on a promontory of
the Cabeço da Calvina, a hill with its hig
highest point at 164
m above the sea level (Fig 2). Currently
ntly the Chalcolithic
fortifications at Zambujal lie between
een 75 and 104 m
above the sea level and from this heig
eight the settlement
must have dominated the valley of the Ribeira de
Pedrulhos, a smaller tributary of the river
ri
Sizandro. On
clear days from Zambujal it is also possible
pos
to overlook
parts of the Sizandro valley, and at thee hhorizon to see the
Atlantic Ocean which lies approximate
ately 10 km to the
west.
Zambujal was discovered by Leonel Tr
Trindade Sr during
his excavations of the cave site of Cova
va da Moura (Kunst,
1993: 47-50). The best preserved parts
ts oof the fortification
84
Copyright material: no unauthorized reproduction in any medium
Chronologically the occupation of Zambujal spans from
the 3rd to the beginning of the 2nd millennia BC (Kunst
& Lutz, 2011: 454-461). E. Sangmeister and H. Schubart
established a system for a relative chronology by phases
of construction including phases of demolition (Versturz)
and settlement activities like layers of fire places
(hearths). Based upon observations of the formations of
the fortification walls, according to this system, there
were 5 periods of defense construction (Fig. 3) which can
be subdivided into16 “construction phases”(Sangmeister
& Schubart, 1981: 226-255). New excavations in the area
of the farm house and the fourth line of fortification
walls, which were discovered in 1995, continue to expand
our understandings of the boundaries of the site. Thus,
the most recent outline of the Chalcolithic fortifications
differs a little bit from the ones published in 1981, and
now include the recently excavated fourth line of
fortification structures within the sequence of
construction phases (Kunst & Lutz, 2011: 447-454) (Fig.
2 and 3).
phase Este 3:
KIA-27564 (3992±24 BP)
BC (2 σ) 2572-2468; 2572-2512 (60,1%)
phase 3b:
GrN-7003 (4055±40 BP) cal BC (2 σ)
2852-2474; 2696-2474 (84,3%)
phase 3b:
GrN-7004 (3995±35 BP) cal BC (2 σ)
2620-2459; 2586-2459 (93,5%)
phase 3c:
GrN-7005 (4055±40 BP) cal BC (2 σ)
2852-2474; 2696-2474 (84,3%)
The absolute chronology of these 5 periods of defense
construction and 16 subdivisions of construction phases
is not very precise because of the plateau in the
calibration curve of the late 3rd millennium BC.
However, even with the calibration curve, according to
the radiocarbon dates (Kunst & Lutz, 2011: 454-461;
Sangmeister & Schubart, 1981: 263-275) the beginning
of settlement at Zambujal dates back to the beginning of
the 3rd millennium:
bef. ph. Este 4: KIA-28668 (3999±29 BP)
2575-2469; 2575-2469 (95,4%)
cal BC (2 σ)
bef. ph. Este 4: KIA-28669 (4001±28 BP)
2575-2470; 2575-2470 (95,4%)
cal BC (2 σ)
bef. ph. Este 4: KIA-27557 (3996±23 BP)
2572-2470; 2572-2512 (62%)
cal BC (2 σ)
after p. Es. 3b: KIA-27555 (3941±32 BP)
2566-2309; 2497-2338 (81,8%)
cal BC (2 σ)
after p. Es. 3b: KIA-27556 (3965±32 BP)
2574-2348; 2574-2432 (84,8%)
cal BC (2 σ)
The dates of period 4 reach the second millennium. They
are all charcoal dates, which mean they may be too old in
some cases, which is obvious in the case of sample GrN7006.
phase 4a-c: GrN-7006 (4090±40 BP) cal BC (2 σ) 28662493; 2763-2563 (68,6%)
phase 4b: GrN-6669 (4025±95 BP) cal BC (2 σ) 28752300; 2875-2334 (93,6%)
before phase 1a: KIA-27565 (4445±31 BP) cal BC (2 σ)
3333-2936; 3133-3009 (47,9%)
phase 4b:
GrN-7007C (3950±65 BP)
BC (2 σ) 2623-2209; 2623-2276 (92,7%)
before phase 1a: KIA-27559 (4238±29 BP) cal BC (2 σ)
2910-2705; 2910-2861 (66,3%)
cal
phase 4c/d:
GrN-6668 (3625±65 BP) cal BC (2 σ)
2198-1776; 2150-1871 (87,7%)
before phase 1a: KIA-7260 (4134±43 BP) cal BC (2 σ)
2875-2581; 2875-2617 (89%)
Lastly, there are two dates, which likely come from
period 5, but for which the exact phase in not clear.
Either way the dates do coincide:
14
The C-dates for the periods 1, 2 and 3 come mainly
from the first half of the 3rd millennium and date around
2500 BC, excluding a series of date from animal bones
without three-dimensional locations (Kunst & Lutz,
2011: 460, Fig. 35).
phase 5: KN-4507 (3466±53 BP) cal BC (2 σ) 19211641; 1921-1663 (94,4%)
phase Este 5?: KIA-27566 (3467±36 BP)
1886-1691; 1886-1691 (95,4%)
phase 1c:
GrN-7009 (4200±40 BP) cal BC (2 σ)
2899-2638; 2818-2665 (67,1%)
cal BC (2 σ)
Thus, the sequence of radiocarbon dates show continued
use and construction at the site from circa 3300-2000 cal
BC. However, between periods 4 and 5 a hiatus in site
activity may have occurred (Sangmeister & Schubart
1981, 247, 272).
phase Este 1:
KIA-27558 (4129±31 BP) cal BC (2 σ)
2872-2581; 2781-2617 (62,6%)
phase 2: GrN-6671 (4170±55 BP) cal BC (2 σ) 28912586; 2891-2619 (93,4%)
phase Este 2:
KIA-27561 (4155±32 BP) cal BC (2 σ)
2878-2630; 2822-2630 (76,5%)
2.3 Materials and Methods
In this study human remains from all regions of the site
of Zambujal (Fig. 4) to date were examined and the
results integrated with the published findings in
Waterman (2012). Skeletal and dental materials were
identified by criteria outlined in standard osteological
phase 2: GrN-7002 (4050±40 BP) cal BC (2 σ) 28512472; 2680-2472 (85,4%)
bef. ph. Este 3: KIA-27563 (4065±37 BP)
2855-2486; 2697-2486 (80,9%)
cal
cal BC (2 σ)
85
Copyright material: no unauthorized reproduction in any medium
texts (Baker et al. 2005; Scheuer and Black
B
2000; White
2000). Duplicate skeletal elemen
ents, age-at-death
estimations, and skeletal morphology
ogy were used to
identify distinct individuals. Instancess of
o pathology were
evaluated on the skeletal and dentall rremains based on
Ortner and Putschar (1981), Hillson ((1996; 2005) and
Buikstra and Ubelaker (1994). Resul
sults of previously
completed isotopic analyses are discu
scussed (Waterman
2012; Waterman et al. 2014).
2.4 Results and Discu
cussion
Currently there are 349 human
an bone fragments recovered
from Zambujal. Over two-third
hirds of these remains were
recovered in a highly fragmen
ented condition. In general
the only complete bones
es found were small,
taphonomically resistant bones
es such as teeth, carpals and
phalanges. Nonetheless, bbasic skeletal element
identifications were possible for over 90% of the remains.
Skeletal elements from alll bbody regions have been
identified suggesting that ther
here may have been some
primary interments and the remains
re
of both adults and
subadults have been recovered
ed (Fig. 5). However, most
bone fragments are found in isolated conditions often
with >10 human bone fragmen
ents recovered together in a
location. This suggests some
me dispersal of the human
remains either through anthr
thropogenic or taphonomic
means. The exceptions are rema
mains recovered from region
S, region KM Tower L, region
ion KM cut 40a and region
AP where larger caches of hum
uman bones were recovered.
It is possible that the remains
ins recovered in these areas
may represent primary buriall sp
spaces. In the next sections,
the amounts and types of hum
uman remains are discussed
according to region.
2.4.1
Region S
At the eastern edge of the site,
te, in region S, 95 fragments
of human remains were reco
ecovered. These fragments
represent elements from all regions
reg
of the human body,
and include 2 vertebral fragm
ments, 13 rib fragments, 2
scapula fragments, 5 ulnar frag
agments (4 of which refit to
form mostly complete rightt ulna),
u
4 radial fragments
(which refit to form an almost
ost complete right radius), 3
humerus fragments (one examp
mple Fig. 5 f), 3 carpals (a
lunate, capitate and scapho
hoid), 16 right and left
metacarpal fragments (8 of whi
hich are complete or nearly
complete), 13 hand phalanges
es (9 of which are complete
or nearly complete), 1 fibu
fibular fragment, 2 tarsal
fragments (talus and calcaneus
eus), 1 complete metatarsal
and 5 metatarsal fragments,, 2 foot phalanges, a right
mandibular fragment with the right third and fourth
premolars, and right first and
nd second molars, a second
right mandibular fragment with
ith the right fourth premolar,
and the right first and sec
econd molars, a maxillary
fragment with the upper left
ft canine, third and fourth
premolar and first molar, pluss ffive addition isolated teeth
and two unidentified bone fragm
agments. The fact that a right
ulna and radius were recovere
ered with a large cache of
other hand bones suggests that
at pprimary burials could have
occurred here. However, the bones
b
were recovered in a
highly fragmented and disarticu
iculated state and the general
lack of pelvises, vertebrae,, and femora suggest the
possibility that this, alternative
ively, may be the site of a
secondary burial deposit. Base
sed upon the occurrence of
two right mandible fragmentss w
with in situ duplicate tooth
types, we know that at le
least two individuals are
represented by these remains.
ns. From the low levels of
occlusal wear on the mola
olars on both mandibular
fragments these appear to have
ha
both been young to
middle-aged adults at the timee of death. Because of the
se constructions of
Fig. 3 – The five phases of defense
Zambujal (after Sangmeister & Schu
hubart, 1981, 226251, modified by M. Kunst and G. Casella).
Cas
86
Copyright material: no unauthorized reproduction in any medium
fragmentary nature of the recovered remains no
determination of biological sex was possible.
2.4.3. Region U
In the western edges of Zambujal, in region U, two
isolated human bones were recovered. The first is an
isolated adult human phalanx and the second is the distal
end of the humerus of an older child. There is no clear
relationship between these bones nor is the chronology
clear for these finds, one comes from the surface and one
could belong to all five periods. Therefore, in region U
we have skeletal elements that represent at least one adult
and one subadult.
Only one radiocarbon date exists from region S (GrN7009: 4200±40 BP; 2899 and 2665 cal BC, see
Sangmeister & Schubart, 1981, 264; Kunst & Lutz 2011,
456). The sample of this date belongs to complex Z-971,
from which the majority of the region S human remains
were found. It belonged to a layer from phase 1c (Tower
S, interior, southern half, layer 5 directly above the rock)
which was active during the first use-phase of the site.
However, later wall constructions also occurred in the
area very possibly dating to the end of phase 4 or even
possibly into phase 5 (Sangmeister & Schubart, 1981
217-223). The apparent mixing of materials from
different archaeological layers also makes clear dating of
the human remains difficult.
2.4.4. Region GH
In the GH region in the southwest of the site three more
isolated human bones were recovered. This first is an
adult carpal bone, a capitate, and the second is a fragment
of an adult long bone, likely a tibia. The third bone is a
fragment of the distal end of a fibula. Again, as with the
two bones recovered from region U, the relationship
between these bones is not clear. However, both long
bone fragments (the tibia shaft and the distal end of
fibula) come from the same phase, 1a, and were found in
close proximity to one another. Thus, chronologically
and by their local proximity they could belong to the
same individual. The carpal bone was found in cut 44, in
front of entrance G and has a less certain chronology
being considered either younger than period 1 or older
than phase 5b. Hence, in this region we have partial
remains of at least one and possibly two individuals.
2.4.2. Region RW
In the RW region in the far southeastern reaches of
Zambujal another cache of human remains was
recovered. This group of 11 adult bone fragments
includes 4 cranial fragments, 1 metatarsal shaft fragment,
1 cervical vertebra fragment, 3 radius and 2 ulna
fragments. The lack of other body elements makes the
origination of this deposit unclear. As region RW is
situated at the southern slope of the site, it is possible that
these bones may have accumulated here through
sedimentary processes.
2.4.5. Region EG
All of the human remains in this area appear to be from
adult individuals and no duplicate skeletal elements were
recovered suggesting these could all be from one adult
individual. However, some questions remain concerning
the relationship between these bones. For example, the
ulna fragments originate from a complex that relates to
the destruction of wall ht in period 1 (Sagmeister &
Schubart, 1981, 205; Abb. 37; Beilage 1). The metatarsal
was found in the first stone layer located 2 meters east of
wall ht and 3 or 4 meters south of tower W and may also
relate to wall destruction, however, the three radius
fragments were found in the filling around entrance “R,”
and should relate to period 3, Thus, the relationship
between this assemblage of bones is unclear and it is
possible that they represent more than one individual.
In the EG region, located in the central east portion of
Zambujal, three isolated human bones were recovered.
These remains include a fragment of a rib head, a maxilla
fragment with two teeth, and a complete first metacarpal.
The rib, maxilla and teeth were all identified as adult
skeletal elements and the degree of wear on the teeth
suggests that these are from a middle-aged or older adult.
The metacarpal originated from a subadult. Concerning
the relationships between these fragments, the rib
fragment was recovered from the filling (middle layer 6)
of the barbican, and therefore, dates to phase 3b.
However, the earth and stones that form this gravel fill
may have been brought in from another area of the site.
The subadult metacarpal was found in layer C of Tower
B, which was the occupation layer of the tower, and
belonged to phase 4a, but we cannot exclude any mixture
with younger sediments during the tower’s destruction.
The maxilla fragment belongs to the yellow layer in cut
14 at the inside of the first fortification line, which can be
dated to phases between 1c and 3b. As these bones all
belong to different phases and different locations it is
likely that these bones originated from three different
individuals. Furthermore, it is possible that they came
into this region of the site in earth brought in for
construction. In the case of the metacarpal, it is possible
that it was the result of a violent altercation, as Zambujal
had extensive fortifications and a large number of arrow
heads were found around the barbican suggesting that this
The four cranial fragments come from the western side of
tower R and are from a yellow clay destruction layer
related to period 2, 3 or 4, and the cervical vertebrae
fragment was recovered to the west of the others from a
layer likely related to phases 3c and 4b. Again these
skeletal elements could be from a separate individual than
the arm bones, but it is not possible to be certain. If all
bones in RW were from one individual, it seems likely
that these bones should have been deposited in a higher
level of the wall between lh and h in order to end up in
this configuration. Consequently, we can conclude that
we find the remains of at least one, but more likely two,
individuals in this region of the site.
87
Copyright material: no unauthorized reproduction in any medium
was the site of some armed conflicts (Uerpmann &
Uerpmann, 2003, 100).
some of the iliopubic ramus. Based upon morphology of
these features the individual appears to have been a
female who was middle-aged or older at the time of
death. The dental wear on the four recovered teeth also
suggests a middle-aged adult.
2.4.6. Region VX
In the VX region, located in the west central portion of
Zambujal, 23 human bone fragments were found
representing upper limb bones, including 2 humeral
fragments, two ulnar fragments, 1 metacarpal and 4 hand
phalanges, lower limb bones, including 4 femoral
fragments, 1 tarsal and two metatarsals, and parts of the
axial skeleton, including 3 rib fragments and 1 vertebral
fragment. Two isolated teeth were recovered, but no other
skull or tooth fragments were found. All of these remains
are from adults and no duplicate skeletal elements were
recovered so at first glance it seems possible that all of
these bones may belong to the same individual.
However, when the positions and chronologies of the
recovered remains are examined, it appears more likely
that in this region we find the partial remains of several
different people. For example, the fragments of femur
and humerus belong to a different phase (phase 1b) than
the vertebral fragment, phase (1c/ 2). A distance away, in
the southern portion of the region in cut 71, another
portion of the VX bones were found. These bones
generally appear to relate to phase 3 a/b, although one rib
fragment was recovered from sediments linked to phase
4b. The remaining bone fragments come from the
northern region of VX, from cuts 46 and 39. These were
recovered from both the surface and from destruction
levels 1, 2 and 3, which relate to phases 4b, 4c, 4d and 5.
Hence, because of the disparate spacing and
chronologies, it is likely that the bones recovered in the
VX region represent 3-4 different individuals.
Temporally, most of the remains including the female
pelvic and infant remains are from the filling of the lower
entrance from phases 2 and 3, although there may have
been some mixing with phase 4. A metatarsal fragment
and tarsal were recovered from sediments related to phase
1 and a metacarpal fragment, a calcaneus fragment and an
unidentified bone fragment were recovered from phase 5
or surface sediments. Thus, in this area it appears we
have the partial remains of an infant and a middle-aged
women dating to phase 2 and/or 3 from the site. It is
possible that the older remains relate to additional
individuals but the relationships are unclear.
2.4.8. Region KM, cut 40a
From cut 40a in the KM region of Zambujal, located in
the northeast region of the site, 47 fragments of human
remains were recovered. All but one of these come from
an adult individual and include 16 vertebral fragments
(see Fig. 5 d for an example), 1 clavicle fragment, 13
cranial fragments, 1 femoral fragment, 1 humeral
fragment, 1 fibular fragment, 1 patella, 2 pelvic
fragments, 2 rib fragments, 4 sacral fragments, 2 tibial
fragments, 1 mandibular fragment with lower left and
right second incisors, and 1 isolated upper left second
incisor (Fig. 6 a). For this collection of remains it was
possible to refit many of the fragments of vertebrae, two
of the pieces of cranium and the two pieces of tibia
(which form an almost complete right tibia). Based on the
morphology of the remains and the fact that there are no
duplicate skeletal elements it is likely that these remains
only represent one adult individual. The humerus and the
other long bone remains were quite robust suggesting
these came from a large individual, likely a male. In
addition to these 45 adult bone fragments one subadult
thoracic vertebra centrum was recovered. Thus, the
remains of at least two individuals were recovered from
this region, an adult (likely male) and a child. The bones
recovered from Region KM cut 40a do not have a clear
chronology as they were recovered in early excavations at
the site and cannot be securely connected with
radiocarbon dates based on wall construction and
destruction.
2.4.7. Region KM, Tower L
Tower L in the KM region of the site is another place
where a large amount of human remains were found at
Zambujal. These remains were the same ones first
recorded and discussed by E. Sangmeister and H.
Schubart in 1981 (Sangmeister & Schubart, 1981:116). In
this area 91 fragments of human remains were recovered
representing all body regions. Over half of the recovered
elements (45 bones or bone fragments) were identified as
infant remains. These infant remains include 14 rib
fragments, 9 cranial fragments, 2 clavicle fragments (see
Fig. 6 b for an example), 1 femoral fragment, right and
left fibulas (nearly complete), 1 metatarsal fragment, 2
metacarpal fragments, 1 radial fragment, a compete right
ulna (Fig. 6 e), a left ulnar fragment and 11 vertebral
fragments (see Fig. 6 c for an example). The remaining
46 bone fragments were fully developed and appear to be
from an adult individual. These include, 1 humeral
fragment, 1 metacarpal fragment, 3 complete hand
phalanges, 3 rib fragments, 1 vertebral fragment, 2
metatarsal fragments, 2 tarsal fragments, 1 complete foot
phalanx, 5 pelvic fragments, 1 patella, 4 teeth, 4 cranial
fragments and 17 unidentifiable bone fragments. One of
the pelvic fragments included the pubic symphysis and
2.4.9. Region KM
In the rest of the KM region, excluding cut 40a, an
additional 13 fragments of human remains were
recovered. These recovered fragments include both adult
and subadult elements. The subadult remains consist of 5
fragments including 2 rib fragments, 1 long bone
fragment likely from a femur or tibia, 1 complete hand
phalange, and 1 complete unfused ilium (pelvic bone).
These bones all appear to have originated from a young
infant.
88
Copyright material: no unauthorized reproduction in any medium
Fig. 4 – Distribution of the hum
uman bones over all regions of the Chalcolithic settle
ttlement of Zambujal.
Circles indicate largerr aand smaller caches of bones (GIS-map created byy D.
D Schäffler).
Fig. 5 – Distribution off the
th human bones over all regions of Zambujal; color
lors indicate the
different phases
es tto which they belong (GIS-map created by D. Schäf
häffler).
89
Copyright material: no unauthorized reproduction in any medium
composed of cranial fragments, teeth, and arm bones.
Slightly north of cut 46 in cut 40/45 more mixed subadult
and adult bones are found, this time including fragments
of subadult and adult humeri and subadult femora. It is
not clear if these relate directly to the bones recovered
from cut 46 but as they are from the same chronology and
the subadult age-at-death appears similar it suggests that
the bones may be from the same individuals.
Consequently, when we consider the location and
chronology of the bones it appears that we have human
bones representing 2 children, 1 adolescent/young adult
and 1 adult in this region.
The remaining 8 bone fragments appear to be from an
adult and originate from all regions of the body. These
include 2 rib fragments, 1 vertebral fragment, a tibia shaft
fragment and a humeral shaft fragment, a metacarpal
fragment, an isolated lower left 3rd molar and an
unidentifiable bone fragment. Ten of these bones come
from Tower M. The oldest of these date to phase 1 b/c
and are exclusively adult remains. The bones from
complex Z-521 relate to the phase 2 and/or 3 in the
occupation history of the tower and are again exclusively
adult remains. The remaining bones relate to phase 4
from the filling of the tower and are exclusively subadult
remains. One remaining bone is recovered from tower N
and relates to phase 2a. Therefore, in the rest of the KM
region partial remains from an adult and an infant were
recovered. It is possible that these remains are related to
those recovered from KM cut 40a, however without
better chronological control this relationship is unclear.
2.4.11. Other locations.
For 6 bone fragments, the provenience is unknown. These
include two teeth, ulnar fragments, a rib fragment and a
proximal hand phalanx. Additionally, several human
bone fragments were recovered from the surface of the
site including 2 cranial fragments and a radius fragment.
An ulnar and a humeral shaft fragment were also
recovered from the fourth line during more recent
excavations. For these no clear chronology or relationship
is currently discernable.
2.4.10: Region AP
In the AP region in the north central area of Zambujal 50
human bone fragments have been recovered. These
remains include adult and subadult elements. The 11
recovered subadult bone fragments include 2 cranial
fragments, rib fragments, 2 femoral shaft fragment, a
distal humerus fragment and 5 teeth. The teeth include
both deciduous and permanent dentition. With the
exception of one (an upper right third molar) all of the
other teeth belong to a child who was between 5-10 years
old at the time of death. The development of the humerus
also fits this same time frame, thus, it appears that in this
area there are the partial remains of an older child. The
upper right third molar does not have fully developed
roots which suggest this tooth came from an older
adolescent or young adult. Of the recovered human
remains 34 adult fragments have been identified. These
include 21 cranial fragments many of which were found
in close proximity and likely belong to the same
individual, 2 humerus shaft fragments that refit, 3 ulna
shaft fragments, 1 femur shaft fragment, a distal foot
phalanx, an upper canine tooth with a broken crown and
4 unidentifiable bone fragments. Thus, in the AP region
of Zambujal we have the partial remains of at least one
older child and one adult. It is possible that the upper
right third molar may belong to the same individual as the
adult skeletal remains, suggesting that this individual may
have been an older adolescent or young adult at the time
of death. When we consider the chronology and find
location of the bones, we find that one fragment of
subadult vertebrae was recovered on its own from house
P in the westernmost area of AP. This area relates to
phase 3c, while the adolescent tooth, a cranial fragment,
two ulnar fragments and a femoral fragment appear to all
relate to the beginning or middle of phase 3 (3a/b). A foot
phalanx was found near these bones but from higher
destruction layer and may or may not relate to the same
individuals. All of the rest of the recovered remains relate
to the destruction levels of phase 4d and 5b and come
from the northern part of cut 46. These include both
subadult and adult skeletal elements which are mainly
2.4.12. Conclusion, Zambujal
Past assessments of the minimum number of individuals
(MNI) represented by the Zambujal human remains,
calculated the MNI based on the total aggregate of bones
recovered at the site (at the time of analysis) (Waterman
2012). These assessments provided an MNI of only 5 for
Zambujal. However, when the geographic location and
the chronological relationships of the finds are
considered, we suggest that the MNI is much higher – in
the range of 20 individuals. Nonetheless, this is not to say
that we find 20 inhumations at Zambujal –quite to the
contrary we find little evidence of intact burials or
otherwise curated whole human bodies. Instead we find
scattered adult and subadult human skeletal elements
which, only occasionally, seem to be from related areas
of the body or even from the same individuals. The only
circumstances where it appears we may have evidence of
primary burials are in region S where a large cache of
bones belonging to two adults were recovered, in tower L
where a large amount of remains from a middle-aged
women and an infant were found, and in KM, cut 40a
where bones of an adult male were unearthed. An
additional primary interment is possible in region AP, but
the complexity of the chronology and recovery locations
make it harder to discern (Fig. 4 and 5).
One of the main goals of this analysis was to attempt to
understand how these human remains came to be buried
at the settlement rather than in the standard burial
locations in the surrounding landscape. Based upon the
diverse array of contexts in which the human remains
were recovered at Zambujal, it seems prudent to consider
that many factors and events contributed to these
distributions. As Zambujal was a heavily fortified site,
and must have been the site of numerous armed conflicts,
it seems likely that at least a portion of these remains
90
Copyright material: no unauthorized reproduction in any medium
were the results of violentt deaths and/or
dismemberments. Some settlement inter
terments could have
occurred based upon funerary practices
es which may have
excluded particular classes of individ
viduals from other
burial locations. For example, youngg infants are rarely
recovered from burial sites in the regio
ion (Waterman and
Thomas 2011), but one is found at Zam
ambujal in the KM
region. This may suggest that infa
infants were more
commonly interred in settlement or household
ho
contexts.
It is not clear if the partial remains of the middle-aged
female found near the infant are related
ed, but it is possible
that this represents a peripartum or pos
ostpartum mortality
event.
patterns may have also contribu
ibuted to these assemblages,
and lastly some of these finds
nds may represent intrusive
burials from later time periods.
s. In order to tease out these
different possibilities a more fine-grained
fi
analysis of the
human remains should be under
dertaken.
In order to ascertain if any of thee potential
p
primary
settlement interments represent indiv
dividuals that are
somehow socially differentiated from
m the rest of the
population in the area, Waterman (201
012) and Waterman
et al. (2014) gathered stable isotope data
da from bone and
tooth samples from some of the Zam
mbujal individuals.
Based upon comparisons of these dataa w
with stable isotope
data from non-settlements burials in the regions, the
sampled adults ate diets that are comp
mparable with other
adults of this time and region, consis
sisting of terrestrial
protein sources and C3 plants. For the
he older child from
the AP region, the δ13C apatite value
val
was strongly
divergent when compared to the rest
st of
o the population
and could provide evidence of C4 or CAM
C
plant intake.
As C4 plants such as millet did not beco
ecome prominent in
human diets and animal feed in the reg
egion until the later
Bronze Age it is possible that this child
ild represents a later
intrusive burial. Alternatively, this ap
apatite enrichment
could be due to diagenesis. The veryy yyoung infant from
tower L exhibited enriched δ15N and δ13Cco values which
are probably due to in-utero patt
atterns of isotope
fractionation and, thus, not necessari
arily a product of
dietary differentiation with regard to the infant or its
mother. Also, in general, the low stand
andard deviations in
δ18O values suggest similar water sourrces for all of the
Zambujal individuals. Based upon thee analysis
a
of 87Sr/86
Sr isotope ratios none of the tested
d individuals from
Zambujal were migrants into this regio
gion. Thus, only in
regard to the older child do we see dietary
die
patterns that
may provide evidence of some differ
ferential identity in
relationship to burial practice.
Fig. 6 – Six examples of hu
human remains recovered
from Zambujal, a. Adult left
ft mandible fragment with
in situ teeth (Z-831-45-01). b
b. Subadult right clavicle
fragment (Z-571-45-01). c. Subadult
Su
thoracic vertebra
fragment (Z-572-45-23) d.. Adult
A
cervical vertebra
fragment (Z-831-45-02). e.. Subadult
S
right ulna (Z485-45-02). f. Adult right distal
dis
end of humerus and
shaft (Z-971-45-08) (photos by M. Kunst).
3.
While some of the Zambujal remain
ins were found in
cluster with many other bones, in oth
other cases only a
handful were found spread across a region. We must
consider other processes to explain thes
ese recoveries. One
strong possibility is that an occasional
al bone
b
was brought
into Zambujal with stones and earth
arth moved in for
construction. The stone wall fortificati
cations at Zambujal
required the moving in of large amou
ounts of earth and
stone and it is highly likely that somee of
o these materials
could have been recycled from older burial
bu
structures. In
many cultures throughout time individu
idual human bones,
or larger portions of skeletons, hav
ave been used as
religious relics. It is possible at Zambuja
ujal that some of the
human remains were curated for re
religious or other
cultural reasons. Animal activity, wea
eather, and erosion
LECEIA
Wa
J. L. Cardoso – A. J. Waterman
3.1. Introduction
This paper presents a synthesis
sis of new and old analyses
on the recovered human rema
mains from the prehistoric
settlement of Leceia. As no larg
large scale cemetery features
are associated with Leceia and
nd burial places during this
time are normally geogra
graphically distinct from
settlements, the aim of this stud
tudy is to identity the special
contexts in which human rema
mains have been recovered
from three distinct loci of thee site. In particular because
the construction of, and success
essive reinforcements to, the
fortifications at Leceia suggest
st a climate of instability and
social competition in the region
r
across the third
millennium BC, we are inte
interested in assessing the
91
Copyright material: no unauthorized reproduction in any medium
possibility that incidents of violent conf
nflict could explain
the occasional finding of human remains
rem
inside the
settlement enclosure.
3.2. Archaeological background
Leceia is located on the right slope of
o a steep hillside
overlooking the valley of the Ribei
beira de Barcarena
(Oeiras), about 4 km from the Tejo
ejo estuary (Fig.1).
Continuous excavations of the settlem
ement were carried
out between 1983 and 2002, under the
he direction of J. L.
Cardoso (Cardoso, 1999; Cardoso, 2008
08; Cardoso, 2012).
Stratigraphic records correlated with ov
over 40 radiocarbon
dates provide a detailed account of the
he cultural sequence
and the construction phases at Leceiaa which
w
span over a
millennium (Fig. 7).The earliest hum
man occupation at
Leceia dates back to the late Neolithicc (s
(second half of the
3rd Millennium BC). This occupationn w
was followed by a
short period of abandonment, lasting
ng as long as one
hundred and fifty years. Then, in the
he beginning of the
Early Chalcolithic (2900/2800 to 2600
00/2500 years BC),
human occupation resumed and imp
imposing defensive
structures were erected, in the form off th
three semi-circular
lines of ramparts and bastions. Th
These fortifications
supplemented the existing natural def
defenses at Leceia,
which consisted of two Cretaceous era limestone cliffs
overlooking the valley (Fig. 8). The defensive
de
structures
were continually refurbished and reinfor
forced over the next
300 years, until approximately the
he middle of the
millennium, suggesting that social instab
stability and conflict
were serious concerns for the communit
nity which occupied
this landscape. Around the middle
dle of the third
millennium BC, during the beginni
nning of the Full
Chalcolithic, the building of these def
defensive structures
stopped and the archaeological reco
cord suggests that
populations were declining in the pre
reviously defended
occupied area. By the end of the Ch
Chalcolithic, which
coincides with the last quarter of the
he third millennium
BC, Leceia had been abandoned.
Fig. 7–Table of cultural and
nd construction phases at
Leceia and their correlation
nw
with the stratigraphy and
absolute chronology (table created
cre
by J.L. Cardoso)
3.3. Materials and Methods
The human remains examined in this
is study come from
three distinct locations, two located w
within the walled
area, Locus 1 (a closed circular structu
cture) and Locus 2
(exterior wall of a bastion); the other, Locus
L
3, is a small
burial cave located on the escarpmentt tthat delineates the
eastern side of the site (Fig. 8). Forr loci 1 and 3 the
human remains had been previously published
pu
(Cardoso,
Cunha & Aguiar, 1991). In this study
udy human remains
from Locus 2 were examined for thee first
f
time and the
results integrated with the published findings.
fin
For Locus
2 skeletal and dental materials were ide
identified by criteria
outlined in standard osteological textss (B
(Baker et al. 2005;
Scheuer and Black 2000; White 2000).
). D
Duplicate skeletal
elements, age-at-death estimations,
ns, and skeletal
morphology were used to identify dis
distinct individuals.
Instances of pathology were evaluatedd oon the skeletal and
dental remains based on Ortner and
d Putschar (1981),
Hillson (1996; 2005) and Buikstra andd U
Ubelaker (1994).
Fig. 8 – Aerial photograp
aph of Leceia, and the
corresponding plan of the eexcavated area, with the
locations of the finds mentione
oned in the text.
92
Copyright material: no unauthorized reproduction in any medium
occupation of the site, was that
th these three individuals
were part of an attacking group
oup and after being captured
and killed, they were disposedd oof in the circular structure,
as trash. However, AMS radio
diocarbon dating completed
on four human bone fragments
nts from Locus 1, made by
initiative of one of us (J.L.C.
.C.) reveal that all of these
remains came from a slightly
y later
l
time (Middle Bronze
Age). Thus, we suggest tha
hat these remains do not
represent an episode of conflic
flict, but rather the reuse of
this Chalcolithic structure durin
ring the Bronze Age, when
the site was already completely
ely abandoned. The reuse of
this closed circular structure may
m have been in the form
of a collective grave site for
or primary burials, or more
likely, given the state of mixing,
mi
fragmentation and
disconnection evidenced by the bones and the absence of
grave goods, as a secondaryy bburial space used for the
disposal of human remains
ins from other locations.
Therefore, although archaeolog
logical evidence of Bronze
Age occupations at Leceia is lacking, it appears likely
that these Chalcolithic fortifi
tifications continued to be
sporadically visited and usedd over the years by small
groups of people. In fact, suchh rreuse has been observed in
other large fortified settlements
nts in the Extremadura, such
as Vila Nova de São Pedro,
ro, Azambuja, where many
artifacts from the Bronze Age
ge were collected (Soares,
2008).
3.4 Results and Discussion
3.4.1 – Locus 1. Closed circular struucture
Based upon the data published in Ca
Cardoso, Cunha &
Aguiar (1991), 36 human bones, bon
one fragments, and
dental remains were found inside a closed circular
structure excavated in 1988, situated in the area adjacent
to one of the passages in the second line
lin of defense. As
indicated by the mixed faunal remainss aand archaeological
materials, in the final phase of occup
cupation at Leceia,
during the Full Chalcolithic, this struc
ructure was used as
trash pit (Fig. 9). Mixed in with the debr
ebris in this location
were the human skeletal remains. All
ll of these remains
were portions of the axial skeleton cons
nsisting of 18 teeth,
1 mandibular fragment, 1 vertebrall fragment
f
and 16
cranial fragments.
The previous published analysis of thee te
teeth indicates that
these remains are from at least three ind
individuals, all adult
males who likely were in their mid-thir
hirties at the time of
death. On the teeth of at least two off these
t
adult males,
dental enamel hypoplasias were noted
no
which may
indicate a period of childhood illness or stress. A carious
lesion was also noted on the tooth of one of the adults.
The AMS radiocarbon resultss obtained
o
are as follows:
Individual
Age-at-death
B
Biological
sex
Adult 1
30-40 years old
Male
Adult 2
30-40 years old
Male
Adult 3
30-40 years old
Male
1 – Fragment of a cranium (calotte)
(ca
Wk – 34420 – 3236 +/- 26 BP,
P, 1606-1574 cal BC (7,9%);
1538-1436 cal BC (86,5%)
2 – Fragment of a cranium (distinct
(d
individual from 1)
(calotte) (Cardoso, Cunha andd A
Aguiar, 1991, Est. 1, n.º 1)
Wk – 36309 – 3201 +/- 25 BP,
P, 1516-1426
1
cal BC (2 σ)
Table 1. Individuals identified
fied in Locus 1
3 – Mandibular fragment (Ca
Cardoso, Cunha and Aguiar,
1991, Est. 1, n.º 2)
Wk – 36307 – 3217 +/- 25 BP,
P, 1527-1431
1
cal BC (2 σ)
4 – Maxillary fragment (Car
ardoso, Cunha and Aguiar,
1991, p. 30, n.º 5)
Wk – 36306 – 3207 +/- 25 BP,
P, 1520-1428
1
cal BC (2 σ).
3.4.2. Locus 2. Exterior wall
all of a bastion
Human remains were also fou
ound at one of the existing
bastions of the first defensive
ve line (Fig. 8), the Bastion
EQ (Fig. 10). The 41 bone fragments
frag
represent all body
regions – upper limb, lower limb,
lim and the axial skeleton
including the skull – and were recovered from a
circumscribed area suggesting
ng a primary interment. No
duplicate skeletal elements or skeletal landmarks were
identified that would sugge
gest an assemblage from
multiple individuals and no pathologies
pa
were identified
on any of the bones. While inn ssome cases it was possible
to refit multiple bone fragm
gments, the only complete
skeletal elements consist of a ppatella and a hand phalanx.
Additionally, although all body
ody regions are present, the
Fig. 9 – Locus 1 in Leceia, silo laterr used
u
as trash pit
(photo by J.L.Cardoso).
As the individuals from which these
se bones originated
were not given the typical funeral treatm
atments of this time
period and region, in the past we hav
have suggested that
these individuals were not native inha
habitants (Cardoso,
Cunha and Aguiar, 1991). One possibl
ible explanation for
these remains, if they were from the Chalcolithic
93
Copyright material: no unauthorized reproduction in any medium
recovered skeletal elements represent only a small
number of the total bones present in the human body,
small bones, such as carpals and tarsals are noticeably
absent and only one phalanx is found in the assemblage
suggesting a high level of disturbance of the remains.
While many of the skeletal elements, in particular a
partial tibia, appear adult-size and rather robust in
comparison with other skeletons of Chalcolithic
populations in this region, proximal and distal ends of the
recovered tibia remain unfused, as do the proximal end of
the humerus, the femoral condyles and the proximal
epiphyses of the recovered hand phalanx. Additionally,
the two recovered premolars exhibit no wear. Thus, it is
clear that these human remains represent a subadult. The
distal epiphyses of the femur and proximal and distal
ends of the tibia fuse in late adolescence between the ages
of 16 and 20 years-old. Considering the size and
robusticity of many of the recovered lower leg bone
fragments, it seems likely that these skeletal remains
belonged to a male individual who died during late
adolescence.
de S. Pedro), it has generally not been possible to identify
directly associated primary or secondary burial grounds.
Instead, only small collective burials (primary or
secondary depositions) in the surrounding regions are
known. Thus, the situation at Leceia is an exception.
The AMS radiocarbon result obtained is as follows:
In contrast with the human remains found in the other
areas of the site, the distribution of age and sex of this set
of individuals is more compatible with the characteristics
of typical prehistoric burial populations in the area.
Recovered remains from all regions of the body –
including the upper and lower limbs and the axial
skeleton –are present. However there is a distinct absence
of vertebral and cranial remains, although 3 mandibles
were recovered. This suggests that this cave may contain
secondary burial deposits. Based upon the previous
analyses (Cardoso, Cunha & Aguiar, 1991), there are a
minimum of 5 individuals represented by these skeletal
elements including two young adults (1 male and 1
female), 1 adolescent and 2 young children. Five isolated
teeth belonging to at least 1 subadult exhibited hypoplasic
defects suggesting childhood illness or malnutrition.
Adolescent 1 16-20 years old
Biological sex
Adult 4
Adult <35 years old
Female
Adult 5
Adult <35 years old
Male
Adolescent 2
16-20 years old
Unknown
Child
1
4-6 years old
Child
2
5-7 years old
The radiocarbon result obtained based upon a set of
human bones is as follows:
ICEN-737 – 3920 +/- 70 BP, 2580-2190 cal BC (2 σ)
As the community living in and around Leceia during the
Chalcolithic were normally buried in properly prepared
collective burial spaces in the surrounding landscape, the
discovery of an isolated individual interred at the base of
the outer wall of one of the bastions built to defend the
site, could be explained as a deliberate offensive act
which resulted in this individual’s death and possible
abandonment at the location of his demise. In contrast to
the remains from Locus 1, an AMS date obtained on a
human rib from Locus 2 show that the individual was
contemporaneous with the last Chalcolithic occupation of
the site, bolstering the theory that this could represent
someone who perished during an episode of conflict.
However, according to the site’s stratigraphic record, the
defensive complex had been abandoned at that time.
Therefore, this occurrence may simply represent an
accidently death and burial event.
Age-at-death
Age-at-death
Table 3 – Locus 3
Wk – 34421 – 3681+/- 26 BP, 2142-1977 cal BC (2 σ)
Individual
Individual
3.5. Conclusion
The human remains collected in Leceia probably show
three distinct situations:
A. Locus 3, a small natural cave in the limestone
escarpment bordering the east side of the settlement,
contains the largest interment of human remains
representing a minimum of five individuals. The
demographic configuration of this burial grouping is
compatible with the existing pattern of mortality of the
Chalcolithic time period. These remains appear to
represent a secondary burial during the later occupation
of the site as the human bones were disarticulated, mixed
with ash and ceramic vessels, and missing certain skeletal
components. This suggests that funerary rituals during
this time were likely complex and that there may have
been another primary funerary space where the bodies
were first deposited.
Biological sex
Male
Table 2 – Locus 2
3.4.3 – Locus 3. Small cave in the escarpment
The largest cache of human remains recovered at Leceia
were found in a small natural cave excavated by Carlos
Ribeiro (Ribeiro, 1878), situated in the bottom of the
natural escarpment delineating the eastern side of the
settlement. These remains also correspond to the end of
Leceia’s occupation and represent a secondary burial
deposit with remains from some of these late prehistoric
villagers. In two other important Chalcolithic fortified
settlements in the Estremadura (Zambujal and Vila Nova
B. In Locus 1, a closed circular structure within the
settlement, the next largest deposit of human remains was
94
Copyright material: no unauthorized reproduction in any medium
recovered. These remains represent a minimum
m
of three
individuals, all likely adult males. Give
ven the fact that the
skeletal remains are fragmented and inc
incomplete, and that
they were recovered from a possible silo
si which appears
to have been later used as a trash pit, an initial theory was
that the remains belonged to a grou
oup of community
outsiders who may have taken part
par in aggressive
activities directed at the community ooccupying Leceia.
Such an event would have explai
lained why these
individuals did not receive typical fun
funerary treatments
and were instead buried in a trash pit
pit. However AMS
radiocarbon dates disproved this theor
eory, revealing that
these individuals are not reflective
ve of Chalcolithic
conflict and unrest as they date to the M
Middle Bronze Age
– providing evidence of the later reusee oof the site.
events cannot explain the majo
ajority of the human burials
at the settlement.
AN LECEIA
4. CONCLUSION: ZAMBUJAL AND
In this paper, human skele
eletal remains from two
prominent settlement sites in
n the
t Estremadura region of
Portugal (Leceia and Zambujal
jal) were examined in order
to investigate how settlemen
ent burials may relate to
individual identity, and/or temp
mporal and spatial aspects of
community life. Our findings
gs have been that, at both
Zambujal and Leceia, the cont
ontexts in which the human
remains are recovered aree diverse and cannot be
explained by one process oor type of event. The
complexity of mortuary and funerary
fu
practices of the 4th
rd
and 3 millennia BC, with
ith a particular focus on
settlements burials, is, at thee m
moment, one of the main
questions of Neolithic/Chalc
alcolithic archaeology in
Portugal (Jorge 1999:88-93) and
an Spain (Barroso et al. in
print; Cruz- Auñón & Mejías
ías, 2013: 186-190; García
Sanjuán & Díaz-Zorita, 2013;; Gómez
G
Pérez et al. 2011).
Similar investigations are aalso occurring in other
European countries, for exam
ample in Germany, where
recent excavations in the epon
onymous settlement site of
the late Neolithic so called “Culture
“Cu
of Salzmünde” (ca.
3400-3050 BC), Salzmünde,
e, 7 km west of Halle
(Sachsen-Anhalt, Germany) sho
show very complex funerary
practices (Friedrich 2013, Stec
techer et al. 2013; Meyer et
al. 2013; Schlenker & Stecher
er 2013) which are forcing
researchers to reassess standa
dard ideas about Neolithic
burial traditions.
C. The human remains from Loc
ocus 2 have been
attributed to a minimum of one individ
vidual. The remains
of this juvenile male of stocky build (16-18
(1
years), were
found at the base of the outer wall off on
one of the bastions
of the most advanced defensive line and
an could represent
someone who perished during an epi
episode of conflict.
However, AMS dates and the stratigraphic
stra
record
suggests that these bones may equally
ly be attributable to
the last period occupation of the sett
settlement and may
represent an accidently death and bu
burial event as the
previous defensive structures had beenn aabandoned by this
time in the settlement’s history.
These new findings suggest
st that perhaps the human
skeletal remains recovered from
fro Neolithic/Chalcolithic
settlements could provide evide
idence of multistage funerary
practices (see Schwarz 2013).
). Similar occurrences have
been noted in Portuguese bur
urials in the cave sites of
Ribatejo (Oosterbeek, 1997)) and,
a
for example, in the
tholos of Praia das Maçãs (Lei
eisner et al., 1969:94). The
complexity of multistage fun
unerary practices has been
discussed in detail by R.. M
Meyer-Orlac in Hallstatt
contexts (Meyer-Orlac 1982:12
123-143).
In the region of Zambujal wee hhave, on the one hand, the
nearby (2km) burial site of Bolo
olores, where it appears that,
at times, primary interments of whole bodies occurred –
as articulated skeletal elements
nts are recovered. However,
disarticulated and commingled
ed remains are also found at
this site. Based on the examples
les of Locus 3 of Leceia, the
cave sites of the Ribatejo, thee tholos
t
of Praia das Maçãs,
and the human remains at Castelo
Ca
Velho de Freixo de
Numão (Jorge 1999, 88-93),
3), we cannot exclude the
possibility that multistage buria
rials occurred at burials sites
like Bolores, wherein thee deceased, after ritual
ceremonies in settlements likee Leceia and Zambujal, and
perhaps after the decompositio
ition of some portion of the
bodies, were deposited in separa
arate burial places. At times,
settlement interments may have
ha
occurred based upon
cultural practices that exclud
uded particular individuals
from secondary burial in othe
her locations. For example,
Fig. 10 – View from outside the Basti
stion EQ at Leceia
(photo by J.L.Cardoso)
In sum, a synthesis of new and old analy
alyses on the human
remains recovered from Leceia provides
des evidence that the
limited number of burials at the settlement
set
occurred
under a diverse set of conditions. On
One set appears to
originate from standard burial practice
tices, while another
provides evidence of the later reuse off tthe site. The third,
a single interment, suggests a deathh caused by either
violent conflict or an accident, either inc
incident resulting in
an anomalous burial event. While one
o
goal of this
investigation was to assess the possibili
ility that settlement
burials were commonly the result of societal
so
conflict, as
the threat of continued external aggres
ression is suggested
by intensive fortifications constructed aat Leceia, with the
exception of the young male burial in Locus
Lo
2, aggressive
95
Copyright material: no unauthorized reproduction in any medium
perhaps some infants, such as the one found at Zambujal,
were only buried in settlements. It is possible that other
socially differentiation groups, such as foreigners, may
have also experienced differential burial practices.
However, in order to gather data on the life histories of
the people whose remains are recovered from settlements,
further bioanthropological analyses are required. Other
explanations may be needed to take into account the
isolated findings of human remains at settlements like
Leceia and Zambujal, such as the keeping of human
remains in settlements as relics or for apotropaic reasons,
or as possible ritual demonstrations of power wherein
skulls or other parts of deceased enemies or criminals are
displayed. Some recovered human remains may simply
reflect the reuse of settlement structures for later burials,
like perhaps in Locus 1 and 2 of Leceia, or the
transportation of human bones into settlements with rocks
and soils brought in for construction projects, such as in
the barbican in Region EG at Zambujal. Erosion patterns,
and the activities of burrowing or scavenging animals
may have also played a role in deposition of human
remains at these sites, however, more detailed analyses of
the individual caches of recovered human remains are
needed to provide clearer insight into these depositional
events. In sum, it appears that, in the cases of Leceia and
Zambujal, the finds of human remains at these
Chalcolithic settlement sites are likely due to multiple
anthropogenic processes and that burial practices in these
communities were more complicated than previously
thought. Further research into these collections of human
remains and the contexts in which they were recovered
will help to clarify our understanding of funerary
practices in late Prehistoric Portugal.
Concepción, Sevilla). Resultados preliminares de una
excavación de urgencia. Anuario Arqueológico de
Andalucía 1995, Actividades de Urgencia, Informes y
Memorias. Sevilla. pp. 589-599.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS:
CARDOSO, J. L. (2002) – Pré-História de Portugal
Lisboa: Verbo.
BAKER, B.J.; DUPRAS, T.K. AND TOCHERI, M.W.
(2005) – The Osteology of Infants and Children. Texas
A&M University Press. College Station, Texas.
BARROSO, R.; BUENO, P.; DE BALBÍN, R.;
VÁZQUEZ, A. AND GONZÁLEZ, A. (in print) –
Nekropolen des 3. Jahrtausends v. Chr. aus dem Zentrum
der Iberischen Halbinsel. Madrider Mitteilungen.
BLASCO, C.; LIESAU, C.; RÍOS, P.; BLANCO, J. F.;
ALIAGA, R.; MORENO, E. AND DAZA, A. (2009) –
Kupferzeitliche
Siedlungsbestattungen
mit
Glockenbecher- und Prestigebeigaben aus dem
Grabenwerk von El Camino de las Yeseras (San
Fernando de Henares, Prov. Madrid). Untersuchungen
zur Typologie des Grabritus und zu dessen sozialer
Symbolik. Madrider Mitteilungen. Mainz. pp. 50: 40-70.
BUIKSTRA, J. AND UBELAKER, D. (EDS.). (1994) –
Standards for Data Collection from Human Skeletal
Remains: Proceedings of a Seminar at the Field Museum
of Natural History. Arkansas Archeological Survey.
Fayetteville.
CARDOSO, J. L. (2000) – The fortified site of Leceia
(Oeiras) in the context of the Chalcolithic in Portuguese
Estremadura. Oxford Journal of Archaeology. 19 (1). pp.
37-55.
We would like to thank Dr. Isaltimo Morais, mayor of the
Oeiras Municipality, for his support to one of us (J.L.C.)
during the excavation campaigns at Leceia and for the
publication of results, including newly completed AMS
radiocarbon dates. We would also like to thank Guida
Casella and Doris Schäffler for their assistance (and
quick turnaround) with many of the Zambujal figures.
Additionally, we would like to thank the president of the
Câmara Municipal de Torres Vedras, Dr. Carlos Miguel,
for his support of the Zambujal and Sizandro-Alcabrichel
projects and the excellent staff of the Museu Municipial
de Torres Vedras for their ongoing assistance with the
curation of the Zambujal collection.
CARDOSO, J. L. (2008) – The Chalcolithic fortified site
of Leceia (Oeiras, Portugal). Verdolay. Murcia. No. 11.
pp. 49-66.
CARDOSO, J. L. (2011) – The prehistoric settlement of
Leceia (Oeiras, Portugal). Results of the excavations of
1983-2002. Supplement to the Archaeological Journal.
Londres : The Royal Archaeological Institute. 168. pp.
42-51.
CARDOSO, J. L. ; CUNHA, A. S. ; AGUIAR, D. (1991)
– O Homem pré-histórico no concelho de Oeiras. Estudos
de Antropologia Física. Oeiras : Câmara Municipal de
Oeiras. Estudos Arqueológicos de Oeiras. No. 2.
BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCES
CRUZ-AUÑÓN BRIONES, R.; MEJÍAS GARCÍA, J. C.
(2013) – Diversidad de prácticas funerarias e identidades
en el asentamiento de Valencina de la Concepción
(Sevilla). In: GARCÍA SANJUÁN, L.; VARGAS
JIMÉNEZ, J. M.; HURTADO PÉREZ, V.; RUIZ
MORENO, T., CRUZ-AUÑÓN BRIONES eds. (2013) –
El asentamiento prehistórico de Valencina de la
Concepción (Sevilla): Investigación y Tutela en el 150
Aniversario del Descubrimiento de La Pastora.
ALMAGRO, M.; ARRIBAS, A. (1963) – El poblado y la
necropolis megalíticos de Los Millares (Santa Fe de
Mondújar, Almería). Madrid: Consejo Superior de
Investigaciones Científicas, Diputación Provincial de
Almería (Bibliotheca Praehistorica Hispana III).
ARTEAGA, O. AND CRUZ-AUÑÓN, R. (1995) – El
sector funerario «Los Cabezuelos» (Valencina de la
96
Copyright material: no unauthorized reproduction in any medium
KUNST, M. (2010) – Zambujal. A dinâmica da
sequência construtiva. In : V. S. GONÇALVES & A. C.
SOUSA ed. (2010) – : Transformação e Mudança no
Centro e Sul de Portugal : o 4º e o 3º milénios a.n.e.,
Actas do Colóquio Internacional (Cascais, 4-7 Outubro
2005). Câmara Municipal de Cascais. Colecção
CASCAIS TEMPOS ANTIGOS 2. pp. 131-153.
Universidad de Sevilla. Sevilla. Historia y Geografía no.
243. pp. 175-199.
FRIEDRICH, S. (2013) – Besiedlungsgeschichte des
Fundortes Salzmünde. In: MELLER, H. (ed.) 3300 BC.
Mysteriöse Steinzeittote und ihre Welt. Landesamt für
Denkmalpflege. Nünnerich-Asmus Verlag & Media.
Halle. pp. 276-281.
KUNST, M. ; Lutz, N. (2011) – Zambujal (Torres
Vedras): investigações até 2007. Parte 1: sobre a precisão
da cronologia absoluta decorrentedas investigações na
Quarta Linha da Fortificação. Estudos Arqueológicos de
Oeiras. Oeiras. No. 18, pp. 419-466.
GARCÍA SANJUÁN, L; DÍAZ-ZORITA BONILLA
(2013) – Prácticas funerarias en estructuras negativas en
el asentamiento prehistórico de Valencina de la
Concepción
(Sevilla):
Análisis
contextual
y
osteoarqueológico. In: GARCÍA SANJUÁN, L.;
VARGAS JIMÉNEZ, J. M.; HURTADO PÉREZ, V.;
RUIZ MORENO, T., CRUZ-AUÑÓN BRIONES eds.
(2013) – El asentamiento prehistórico de Valencina de la
Concepción (Sevilla): Investigación y Tutela en el 150
Aniversario del Descubrimiento de La Pastora.
Universidad de Sevilla. Sevilla. Historia y Geografía 243.
pp. 387-403.
KUNST, M. ; MORÁN, E. ; PARREIRA, R. (2013) –
Zambujal (Torres Vedras): relatório das escavações de
2002. Revista Portuguesa de Arqueologia. Lisboa. No.
16, pp. 103-131.
KUNST, M. ; TRINDADE, L.J. (1990) – Zur
Besiedlungsgeschichte des Sizandrotals. Ergebnisse aus
der Küstenforschung. Madrider Mitteilungen. Mainz.
Vol. 31, pp. 34-82. Taf. 3-14.
GÓMEZ PÉREZ; J. L.; BLASCO, C.; TRANCHO, G.;
RÍOS, P.; GRUESO, I.; MARTÍNEZ, M. S. (2011) – V.
Antropología. V. 1 Los protagonistas. In: BLASCO, C.;
LIESAU, C.; RÍOS, P. eds. (2011) – Yacimientos
calcolíticos con campaniforme de la región de Madrid:
Nuevos estudios. Madrid: Universidad Autónoma de
Madrid. Patrimonio Arqueológico de Madrid, no. 6. pp.
99-132.
KUNST, M. ; UERPMANN, H.-P. (2002) – Zambujal
(Torres Vedras, Lisboa): relatório das escavações de 1994
e 1995. Revista Portuguesa de Arqueologia. Lisboa. No.
5(1). pp. 67-120.
LAGO,
M.;
DUARTE,
C.;
VALERA,
A.;
ALBERGARIA, J.; ALMEIDA, F. AND CARVALHO,
A. FAUSTINO (1998) – Povoado dos Perdigões
(Reguengos de Monsaraz): dados preliminares dos
trabalhos arqueológicos realizados em 1997. Revista
Portuguesa de Arqueologia. No. 1(1). pp. 45-152.
HILLSON, S. (1996) – Dental Anthropology. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
HILLSON, S. (2005) – Teeth. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
LEISNER, V.; ZBYSZEWSKI, G.; FERREIRA, O. DA
VEIGA (1969) – Les Muments Préhistoriques de Praia
das Maçãs et de Casainhos. Serviços Geológicos de
Portugal. Lisboa Memória (new series) No. 16).
HÖCK, M. (2007) – O sistema de coordenadas no
Zambujal a partir de 1994. Revista Portuguesa de
Arqueologia. Lisboa. No. 10(1). pp. 119-122.
JALHAY, E. (1946) – O monumento pré-histórico do
Casal do Zambujal (Torres Vedras). Brotéria. Lisboa.
No. 42(4). pp. 387-393.
LILLIOS, K. T.; ARTZ, J.-A. ; WATERMAN, A. J. ;
MACK, J. ; THOMAS, J. T. ; TRINDADE, L. & LUNA,
I. (in print) – The Rock-Cut Tomb of Bolores (Torres
Vedras): An Interdisciplinary Approach to Understanding
the Social Landscape of the Late Neolithic of the Iberian
Peninsula. Trabajos de Prehistoria. Madrid.
JORGE, S. O. (1999) – Castelo Velho de Freixo de
Numão (Vila Nova de Foz Côa, Portugal). Geschichte der
Interpretationsversuche. Madrider Mitteilungen. Mainz.
40, pp. 80-96. Taf. 20-23.
LILLIOS, K. T.; WATERMAN, A. J. ; ARTZ, J.-A. &
JOSEPHS, R. L. (2010) – The Neolithic-Early Bronze
Age mortuary rockshelter of Bolores, Torres Vedras,
Portugal: Results from the 2007 and 2008 excavations.
Journal of Field Archaeology. No. 35(1). pp. 16-36.
KUNST, M. (1987) – Zambujal. Glockenbecher und
kerbblattverzierte Keramik aus den Grabungen 1964 bis
1973. Mainz: Verlag Philipp von Zabern. Madrider
Beiträge. No. 5(2).
MEYER, C.; KARIMNIA, S.; KNIPPER, C.; STECHER,
M.; BRANDT, G.; SCHLENKER, B.; RAMSTHALER,
F.; ALT, K. W. (2013) – Eine komplexe
Mehrfachbestattung der Salzmünder Kultur. In:
MELLER, H. ed (2013) –. 3300 BC. Mysteriöse
Steinzeittote und
ihre
Welt. Landesamt
für
KUNST, M. (1993) – Mauern und Türme der Kupferzeit.
In : H. SCHUBART ; A. ARBEITER, S. NOACKHALEY ed. (1993) –: Funde in Portugal. MusterSchmidt Verlag. Göttingen, Zürich. Sternstunden der
Archäologie 12. pp. 47-67.
97
Copyright material: no unauthorized reproduction in any medium
Denkmalpflege, Nünnerich-Asmus Halle: Verlag &
Media. pp. 290-299.
Denkmalpflege. Halle: Nünnerich-Asmus Verlag &
Media
MEYER-ORLAC, R. (1982) – Mensch und Tod.
Archäologischer Befund, Grenzen der Interpretation.
Klaus Renner Verlag. Hohenschäftlarn.
SOARES, J. (2003) – Os hipogeus pré-históricos da
Quinta do Anjo (Palmela) e as economias do simbólico.
Setúbal: Museu de Arqueologia e Etnografia do Distrito
de Setúbal/ Assembleia Distrital de Setúbal.
MORÁN, E. ; PARREIRA, R. (2004) – Alcalar 7. Estudo
e reabilitação de um monumento megalítico. Lisboa:
Ministério da Cultura, IPPAR Cadernos. II series, no. 6).
SOUSA, A. C. (2010) – Penedos e muralhas. A leitura
possível das fortificações do Penedo de Lexim. In : V. S.
GONÇALVES & A. C. SOUSA : Transformação e
Mudança no Centro e Sul de Portugal : o 4º e o 3º
milénios a.n.e., Actas do Colóquio Internacional
(Cascais, 4-7 Outubro 2005). Câmara Municipal de
Cascais. Colecção CASCAIS TEMPOS ANTIGOS 2. pp.
19-41.
ORTNER, D.J. AND PUTSCHAR, W.G.H. (1985)
Identification of Pathological Conditions in Human
Skeletal Remains. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian
Institution Press.
OOSTERBEEK, L (1997) Back home! Neolithic life and
the rituals of death in the Portuguese Ribatejo: Human
Use of Caves. Oxford: Archaeopress. pp. 70-78.
SPINDLER, K. (1981) – Cova da Moura. Die Besiedlung
des Atlantischen Küstengebietes Mittelportugals vom
Neolithikum bis an das Ende der Bronzezeit. Mainz:
Verlag Philipp von Zabern Madrider Beiträge. No. 7.
PAÇO, A. do; SANGMEISTER, E. (1956) – Vila Nova
de S. Pedro, eine befestigte Siedlung der Kupferzeit in
Portugal. Germania. Berlin. No. 34, pp. 211-230.
STECHER, M.; SCHLENKER, B.; ALT, K. W. (2013) –
Die Scherbenpackungsgräber. In: MELLER, H. ed.
(2013) – 3300 BC. Mysteriöse Steinzeittote und ihre Welt.
Landesamt für Denkmalpflege. Halle: Nünnerich-Asmus
Verlag & Media. pp. 282-289.
RIBEIRO, C. (1878) – Estudos prehistoricos em
Portugal. Notícia de algumas estações emonumentos
prehistoricos. I. Noticia da estação humana de Licêa.
Memoria apresentada à Academia Real das Sciências de
Lisboa. Lisboa: Typographia da Academia.
UERPMANN, H.-P. ; UERPMANN, M. (2003) –
Zambujal. Die Stein- und Beinartefakte aus den
Grabungen 1964 bis 1973. Mainz: Verlag Philipp von
Zabern. Madrider Beiträge. No. 5(4).
SANGMEISTER, E. ; JIMÉNEZ GÓMEZ, M. C. (1995)
– Zambujal. Kupferfunde aus den Grabungen 1964 bis
1973, Los amuletos de las campañas 1964 hasta 1973.
Mainz: Verlag Philipp von Zabern Madrider Beiträge.
No. 5(3).
WATERMAN, A. J. ; PEATE, D. W. ; SILVA, A. M. &
THOMAS, J. T. (2014) In Search of Homelands: Using
Strontium Isotopes to Identify Biological Markers of
Mobility in Late Prehistoric Portugal. Journal of
Archaeological Science. No. 42 C. pp. 119-127.
SANGMEISTER, E. ; SCHUBART, H. (1981) –
Zambujal. Die Grabungen 1964 bis 1973. Mit Beiträgen
von A. v. d. Driesch u. J. Boessneck, M. Hopf, G. Sperl,
B. Kleinmann. Mainz: Verlag Philipp von Zabern
Madrider Beiträge. No. 5(1).
WATERMAN, A. J. (2012) –Marked in Life and Death :
Identifying Biological Markers of Social Differentiation
in Late Prehistoric Portugal. Dissertation. University of
Iowa, Iowa City.
SAVORY, H. N. (1972) – The cultural sequence at Vila
Nova de S. Pedro. A study of the section cut through the
innermost rampart of the Chalcolithic Castro in 1959.
Madrider Mitteilungen. Heidelberg. No. 13. pp. 23-37,
Taf. 2-5.
WHITE, T.D. (2000) – Human Osteology. San Diego:
Academic Press.
SCHEUER, L. AND BLACK, S. (2000) –Developmental
Juvenile Osteology. San Diego, California: Academic
Press.
SCHLENKER, B.; STECHER, M. (2013) – Die
Lehmentnahmegruben. In: MELLER, H. ed. (2013) –
3300 BC. Mysteriöse Steinzeittote und ihre Welt.
Landesamt für Denkmalpflege. Halle: Nünnerich-Asmus
Verlag & Media. pp. 300-305.
SCHWARZ, R. (2013) – Mehrstufige Bestattungssitten.
In: MELLER, H. ed. (2013) – 3300 BC. Mysteriöse
Steinzeittote
und
ihre
Welt.
Landesamt
für
98