[go: up one dir, main page]

Academia.eduAcademia.edu
Bull Environ, Contam. Toxicol. (1993) 50:659--664 9 1993 Springer-Verlag New York Inc. i Environ.rner~..al Effect of Detergent on the Response to Temperature and Growth of Grass Carp, Ctenopharyngodon iclella Guillermina Alcaraz, Carlos Rosas, and Sonia Espina Ecophysiology Laboratory, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, National Autonomous University of Mexico, M6xico, D.F., CP 04510, Mexico The increase in urbanization in the last decades has p r o d u c e d an increase in discharges of domestic and industrial residues. During this period, detergents have become a severe problem in aquatic systems. These substances are rarely found in c o n c e n t r a t i o n s lethal to aquatic organisms; however, they cause stress and interfere with their fitness. Sublethal concentrations of surfactants harm the gill epithelium of fish by changing the lipid c o m p o s i t i o n of the tissue and affecting the production of mucus. They also partially destroy the epithelium chloride cells (Schmid and Mann 1961; Abel and Skidmore 1974). The deterioration of the gill epithelium alters the respiratory function and the hydromineral balance in these organisms (Rosas et al. 1988). The presence of detergents in the environment has also been seen to harm the peripheral nerve receptors of fish which in turn causes changes in feeding and t h e r m o r e g u l a t o r y behavior (Bardach et al. 1965; Olgivie and A n d e r s o n 1965). Changes in the energy balance of C t e n o p h a r y n q o d o n idella (Val.) subjected to sublethal c o n c e n t r a t i o n of detergents have been recently reported (Espina et al. 1986). These responses together with selection and avoidance of temperature have survival value as they affect the functional relationships between the organism and its environment, and are ecologically meaningful as a result (Sprague 1971; Prosser and Nelson 1981). Several authors have observed changes in the selection of, as well as in the tolerance to t e m p e r a t u r e on the part of fish subjected to sublethal c o n c e n t r a t i o n s of c o n t a m i n a t i n g agents. However, little is known about the effect of detergents on fish responses. The effect of a detergent of domestic use on the thermic responses of the juveniles of the herbivorous carp C. idella was Send reprint requests above address. to Guillermina 659 Alcaraz at the e v a l u a t e d in this work. This species was s e l e c t e d as a test o r g a n i s m b e c a u s e of its i m p o r t a n c e in a q u a c u l t u r e in this country. MATERIALS AND METHODS J u v e n i l e s of the h e r b i v o r o u s carp C. idella (1.03-2.60 g wet weight) o b t a i n e d from a c o m m e r c i a l h a t c h e r y were kept in the l a b o r a t o r y in glass a q u a r i a at a d e n s i t y of ten fish per 30 L, in dechlorinated, a e r e a t e d w a t e r w i t h an a l k a l i n i t y ~ f 136-139 mg CaCO3/L. Fish w e r e m a i n t a i n e d at 24 - l~ for 1 wk after w h i c h the t e m p e r a t u r e was raised l~ day up to 29 t_ loC. This t e m p e r a t u r e is d i r e c t l y related to the carp's thermal p r e f e r e n d u m when m e a s u r e d against a h o r i z o n t a l g r a d i e n t in the l a b o r a t o r y (Alcaraz 1989). Fish w e r e fed (8% of their body w e i g h t per day) g r o u n d carp p e l l e t s c o m b i n e d with lucern (75:25). P h o t o p e r i o d was m a i n t a i n e d at 12 h of light:12 h of darkness. S u b l e t h a l c o n c e n t r a t i o n s of c o m m e r c i a l d e t e r g e n t (41.9% s o d i u m alkyl aryl sulphonate, AAS) of 0.0 (control), 5.0, 8.0 and 12.6 m g / L were used. T h i r t y fish were e x p o s e d (21-25 d) in separate 30 L a e r e a t e d aquaria at 29-C, and two thirds of the w a t e r v o l u m e was c h a n g e d daily after feeding (Espina et al. 1986). Behavioral responses of fish to temperature were e v a l u a t e d along a h o r i z o n t a l thermal g r a d i e n t (Alcaraz 1989). G r a d i e n t was e s t a b l i s h e d in an a s b e s t o s tube. Fish were i n t r o d u c e d into the g r a d i e n t (19-38~ sector at a t e m p e r a t u r e similar to that of a c c l i m a t i o n (29~ and o b s e r v a t i o n s started 40 min later. The fish positions along the thermal gradient and the temperature were recorded for the control and e x p e r i m e n t a l groups every i0 min for a p p r o x i m a t e l y 3 hr. Five carps were m e a s u r e d at a time. Four r e p l i c a t i o n s of each t r e a t m e n t w e r e c o n d u c t e d (n=80) at the same time of day in order to avoid diel f l u c t u a t i o n effects on fish preferenda. Superior incipient lethal temperature (SILT) was e s t a b l i s h e d a c c o r d i n g to K i l g o u r et al. (1985) to e v a l u a t e thermal t o l e r a n c e of the j u v e n i l e g r a s s carps, w h i c h is the same t e m p e r a t u r e at w h i c h 50% of the test fish died. Ten fish of all e x p e r i m e n t a l c o n d i t i o n s w e r e a b r u p t l y t r a n s f e r e d from w a t e r at 29~ to a e r e a t e d w a t e r baths at seven d i f f e r e n t temperatures. Fish that r e m a i n e d alive for more than 120 min w e r e discarded. R e s i s t a n c e times were r e g i s t e r e d for i n d i v i d u a l fish in each bath. Data were used to c a l c u l a t e m o r t i f i c a t i o n rates a c c o r d i n g to the above m e n t i o n e d authors. 660 G r o w t h rates from fish s u b j e c t e d to d i f f e r e n t d e t e r g e n t c o n c e n t r a t i o n s (0, 5, 8 and 12.6 mg/L), w e r e c a l c u l a t e d from the d i f f e r e n c e b e t w e e n the initial and the final wet w e i g h t a f t e r 21 days. V a l u e s w e r e e x p r e s s e d as mg/day. For the s t a t i s t i c a l analysis, m e d i a n v a l u e s of fish thermal p r e f e r e n c e and c o n f i d e n c e i n t e r v a l s (95%) w e r e c a l c u l a t e d u s i n g the S T A T G R A P H I C S s t a t i s t i c a l p r o g r a m (1985). This p r o g r a m also f a c i l i t a t e d c a l c u l a t i o n of the r e g r e s s i o n line p a r a m e t e r s fitted by the least squares m e t h o d used in the SILT calculation. In o r d e r to i d e n t i f y s i g n i f i c a n t d i f f e r e n c e s the K r u s k a l - W a l l i s non p a r a m e t r i c test was c a r r i e d out (Zar 1974). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION A survival of maintenance period were subjected concentrations. detergent affected t e m p e r a t u r e of the idella. 100% was registered during the as well as d u r i n g the time the fish to the different detergent However, exposure (21 d) to the g r o w t h and c h a n g e d the r e s p o n s e s to j u v e n i l e s of the h e r b i v o r o u s carp C. The final t e m p e r a t u r e p r e f e r e n d u m of the u n e x p o s e d fish m e a s u r e d by the acute m e t h o d was 29~ A t e n d e n c y to prefer higher temperatures as the detergent c o n c e n t r a t i o n in the e n v i r o n m e n t increased was o b s e r v e d (Table i), a l t h o u g h only at the g r e a t e s t c o n c e n t r a t i o n were the d i f f e r e n c e s b e t w e e n the control g r o u p and the o t h e r e x p e r i m e n t a l groups s i g n i f i c a n t (P < 0.05). Superior incipient lethal t e m p e r a t u r e (SILT) of C. idella subjected to the detergent significantly d e c r e a s e d (P < 0.05) with an increase in the d e t e r g e n t c o n c e n t r a t i o n in the e n v i r o n m e n t (Table i). The v a l u e of SILT was d i f f e r e n t from that of the control at each c o n c e n t r a t i o n (P < 0.05). T h e r e w e r e not any d i f f e r e n c e s in the initial fish w e i g h t of control and e x p e r i m e n t a l g r o u p s (P>0.05). The g r o w t h rate (mg/day) of the fish in the control group was s i g n i f i c a n t l y g r e a t e r (P<0.05) than that of the carps s u b j e c t e d to the c o n t a m i n a t i n g agent (Table 2). A m o n g these it was p o s s i b l e to o b s e r v e an i m p o r t a n t d e c r e a s e in g r o w t h when the d e t e r g e n t c o n c e n t r a t i o n increased. For the control group a 31% increase in w e i g h t was r e g i s t e r e d in 21 d, in c o n t r a s t a 16% increase in weight the carps subjected to a c o n c e n t r a t i o n of 5 m g / L of detergent, and a 4.7 and 3.7% increase in w e i g h t those s u b j e c t e d to the g r e a t e s t c o n c e n t r a t i o n s (8 and 12.6 mg/L). 661 T a b l e i. M e d i a n v a l u e s and 95% c o n f i d e n c e limits of p r e f e r r e d t e m p e r a t u r e (PT) and s u p e r o r i n c i p i e n t lethal t e m p e r a t u r e (vC) of C. idella e x p o s e d 21 d to d i f f e r e n t detergent concentrations (mg/L). N u m b e r of fishes in parentheses. Detergent PT 0.0 30.00 29.7 - 30.3 (20) 30.97 30.5 - 31.4 (20) 30.00 29.6 - 30.4 (20) 31.50 9 31.2 - 31.8 (20) 5.0 8.0 12.6 The s i g n i f i c a n t d i f f e r e n c e s an a s t e r i s k (*). SILT (P < 0.05) 39.50 39.2 - 39.8 (i0) 36.80 * 36.6 - 37.0 (i0) 38.60 * 38.1 - 39.1 (i0) 35.40 * 35.2 - 35.6 (i0) are m a r k e d with The thermal preferences of ectothermic organisms c h a r a c t e r i z e t h e i r c a p a c i t y to r e s p o n d to the d i r e c t i n g influence of temperature. Reynolds and Casterlin (1977) h a v e m e n t i o n e d t h a t fish, t o g e t h e r w i t h o t h e r vertebrates, exhibit this capacity by occupying a n a r r o w range w h e n p l a c e d in an ample t h e r m a l g r a d i e n t in the laboratory. This is i n t e r p r e t e d as a r e f l e c t i o n of the precision of thermoregulator behavior. Any c h a n g e in the f a v o r i t e t e m p e r a t u r e of the fish serves as an i n d i c a t o r of a l t e r a t i o n s c a u s e d by c h a n g e s in the environment, such as thermal stress or the p r e s e n c e of p e s t i c i d e s (Olgivie and A n d e r s o n 1965). This latter is due to the p r e c i s i o n and s p e c i f i c i t y of t h e r m o s e l e c t i o n in fish. The above m e n t i o n e d a u t h o r s d e m o n s t r a t e d that salmon (Salmo salar) selects lower or higher t e m p e r a t u r e s w h e n s u b j e c t e d to DDT d e p e n d i n g on w h e t h e r the c o n c e n t r a t i o n of the c o n t a m i n a t i n g a g e n t is h i g h or low. P e t e r s o n (1973) p r o v e d t h a t S. s a l a r p r e f e r r e d temperatures 5 to 7~ h i g h e r t h a n the c o n t r o l s w h e n subjected to the g r e a t e r concentrations of several pesticides, and o b s e r v e d s i m i l a r e f f e c t s in S a l v e l i n u s fontinalis. The juveniles of the herbivorous carp selected temperatures h i g h e r t h a n those at w h i c h the a n i m a l s a c c l i m a t i z e d . The acute p r e f e r e n d u m that c h a r a c t e r i z e d thermoselection was 29~ The v a l u e of the s e l e c t e d t e m p e r a t u r e i n c r e a s e d as the d e t e r g e n t c o n c e n t r a t i o n in the e n v i r o n m e n t increased. A c o n c e n t r a t i o n of 12.6 m g / L of a c t i v e agent b r o u g h t about s i g n i f i c a n t (P < 0.05) 662 differences with respect to the control. This is T a b l e 2. G r o w t h rate (mg/day) of C. idella e x p o s e d to different detergent concentration for 21 days (mean values). N = n u m b e r of organisms. Detergent 0.0 5.0 8.0 12.6 N 30 30 30 30 Initial w e i g h t (g) Final w e i g h t (g) 1.35 1.68 1.69 1.34 /weight (mg/day) 1.77 1.95 1.77 1.39 The s i g n i f i c a n t d i f f e r e n c e s an a s t e r i s k (*). (P < 0.05) 20.00 12.86 * 3.81 * 2.38 * are m a r k e d w i t h i n t e r p r e t e d as a s y m p t o m of stress since the p r e f e r r e d t e m p e r a t u r e r e p r e s e n t s the thermal g r a d i e n t interval in which the fish carry out their functions more e f f i c i e n t l y (Kellog and Gift 1983). The d i f f e r e n c e was only of 1.5~ but i n d i c a t e d thermal d i s o r i e n t a t i o n . Fish g r o w t h rate was c a l c u l a t e d in order to e s t a b l i s h the d e g r e e of stress caused by the detergent, as g r o w t h r e s p o n d s s p e c i a l l y well to the s e l e c t e d temperature. C o m p a r e d w i t h the control, a 36.9% d e c r e a s e in the growth rate of fish subjected to the lesser c o n c e n t r a t i o n and a d e c r e a s e g r e a t e r than 88% in that fish subjected to the greater concentration were registered. In a p r e v i o u s p a p e r (Espina et al. 1986) the e n e r g y b a l a n c e of j u v e n i l e s of C. idella was found to be a l t e r e d by alkyl aryl sulphonate. The d i f f e r e n c e b e t w e e n the s e l e c t e d t e m p e r a t u r e and the SILT is 9.5 ~ in the control groups of j u v e n i l e s of C. idella and it d e c r e a s e s to 5.8 C and to 3.9 C at the lower and h i g h e r c o n c e n t r a t i o n of the c o n t a m i n a t i n g agent respectively. The effect of the d e t e r g e n t is also e v i d e n t in the d e c r e a s e in the s u p e r i o r i n c i p i e n t lethal temperature, and this d e c r e a s e d e p e n d s on the c o n c e n t r a t i o n of the d e t e r g e n t in the environment. O O -- The exposure of the organisms to sublethal c o n c e n t r a t i o n s of d e t e r g e n t altered the r e s p o n s e s to the d i r e c t i n g influence of t e m p e r a t u r e as well as t e m p e r a t u r e acts as a m o d u l a t i n g factor. Acknowledgments. We thank the Centro Piscicola T e z o n t e p e c de Aldama, H i d a l g o and Biol. G e r a r d o Cruz for s u p p l y i n g C. idella juveniles. The t r a n s l a t i o n E n g l i s h w r i t i n g by Biol. Ma. A n t o n i e t a A r i z m e n d i g r e a t l y appreciated. 663 de O. to is REFERENCES Abel PD, S k i d m o r e JF (1974) Toxic effects of an a n i o n i c d e t e r g e n t on the gills of r a i n b o w trout. W a t e r Res 9:759-765 Alcaraz, G (1989) A l t e r a c i o n e s producidas por el d e t e r g e n t e en las r e s p u e s t a s fisiologicas y de m p o r t a m i e n t o en la carpa h e r b i v o r a C t e n o p h a r y n q o d o n idella en r e l a c i o n con la temperatura. Tesis de Licenciatura. F a c u l t a d de C i e n c i a s Universidad N a c i o n a l A u t 6 n o m a de Mexico, 38 pp American Public Health Association (1985) Standard M e t h o d s for E x a m i n a t i o n of W a t e r and W a s t e W a t e r 16 th ed, Washington, DC 1266 pp Bardach JE, Fujiya M, Holl A (1965) Detergent: E f f e c t on the chemical senses of the fish I c t a l u r u s n a t i a l i s (Le Suer). Science 148:1605-1607 Espina S, Diaz F, Rosas C, Rosas I (1986) I n f l u e n c i a del detergente sobre el balance energetico de Ctenopharyngodon idella a traves de un b i o e n s a y o cronico. C o n t a m A m b i e n t 2:25-37 K i l g o u r DM, M c C a u l e y RW, Kwain W (1985) M o d e l i n g the lethal effects of high t e m p e r a t u r e on fish. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 42:947-951 K e l l o g R, Gift R (1983) R e l a t i o n s h i p b e t w e e n o p t i m u m t e m p e r a t u r e s for g r o w t h and p r e f e r r e d t e m p e r a t u r e s for the young of four fishes. Trans A m e r Fish Soc 12:424-430 Olgivie DM, Anderson JM (1965) Effect of DDT on t e m p e r a t u r e s e l e c t i o n by young a t l a n t i c salmon, Salmo salar. J Fish Res Bd Can 22:503-512 P e t e r s o n RH (1973) T e m p e r a t u r e s e l e c t i o n of A t l a n t i c salmon (Salmo salar) and b r o o k t r o u t (Salvelinus fontinalis) as influenced by v a r i o u s chlorinated hydrocarbons. J Fish Res Bd Can 30:1091-1097 Prosser CL, N e l s o n DO (1981) The role of nervous s y s t e m in t e m p e r a t u r e a d a p t a t i o n of poikilotherms. Ann Rev Physiol 43:281-300 Reynolds WW, Casterlin ME (1979) Behavioral thermoregulation and the "Final Preferendum" paradigm. A m e r Zool 19:211-224 Rosas C, Espina S, Diaz F, Curts J, Rosas I (1988) Effect of sublethal d e t e r g e n t upon gill p e r m e a b i l i t y of Ctenopharynqodon idella (Pisces, Cyprinidae). W a t e r Air and Soil Poll 4 2 : 2 5 3 - 2 6 0 Schmid OJ, Mann H (1961) Action of a detergent (Dodecylbenzene-sulphonate) on the gills of the trout. N a t u r e 192 S p r a g u e JB (1971) M e a s u r e m e n t of p o l l u t a n t t o x i c i t y to fish. III- Sublethal effects of "safe" concentration. W a t e r Res 5:245-266 Zar JH (1974) B i o s t a t i s t i c a l Analysis. Prentice-Hall, E n g l e w o o d Cliffs, NJ 619 pp Received M a y l l , 1992;acceptedSeptember8,1992. 664