P u b lis h e d b y th e N ig e r ia n L ib r a r y A s s o c ia tio n , G o m b e S ta te C h a p te r
JEWEL JOURNAL
OF LIBRARIANSHIPqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJ
Published By The Nigerian Library Association,
Gombe State Chapter
VOL. 8, NO. I, 2015
IS S N : 2141
- 3908
G o m b e S ta te C h a p te r V o l. qponmlkjihgfedcbaZY
8 N o. J
J e w e l J o u r n a l o f L ib r a r ia n s h ip
A SURVEY OF LIBRARY MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE PACKAGES ADOPTED FOR
LIBRARY OPERATIONS AND SERVICES IN THREE UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES IN
NORTH-WEST NIGERIA
Mohammed M. Kpakiko
Abdullahi Fodiyo Library
Usmanu Danfodiyo University, Sokoto
kpakmoh@yahoo.com, kpakiko.mohammed@udusok.edu.ng
Hashimu Suleiman
Waziri Junaidu Library
Shehu Shagari College of Education, Sokoto
Murtala Aliyu
Abdulrahaman Ghaji Library
Adamawa State University, Mubi, murtala.aliyu77@gmail.com
A b s tr a c t
T h is
s tu d y
lib r a r ie s
s o ftw a r e
lib r a r y
packages
packages
w h ic h
7fr o m
a n d b e in g
in flu e n c e
and
te c h n iq u e
U n iv e r s ity ,
th e
open
c h o ic e
o f th e
L ib r a r y
e le c tr ic ity
M anagem ent
u n iv e r s ity
lib r a r ie s
m anagem ent
e le c tr o n ic
s o ftw a r e
w h ic h
p r o d u c tiv e
tr a in in g
fo r m
P ackages
a r e g r o s s ly
in th e u n iv e r s ity
s e r v ic e s ,
e le c tr o n ic
a u to m a tio n
s o ftw a r e
s e r v ic e s
s h o u ld
lib r a r ie s
docum ent
d e liv e r y ,
th a t w ill a c c o m m o d a te
in flu e n c e
in o r d e r
m a n a g e m e n t.
th e
c h o ic e
to c h e c k
such
o f lib r a r y
o p e r a tio n s
and
breakdow n
im p le m e n ta tio n
of
fo u n d
th a t
o n th e lib r a r y
c a ta lo g u in g /c la s s ific a tio n ,
o n lin e
a ll c o r e lib r a r y
in a d e q u a c y
th a t
I t w a s c o n c lu d e d
m o d u le s
as
c r ite r ia
hardw are
s u c c e s s fit!
The paper
F a c to r s
s ta ff tr a in in g
lib r a r y
s tu d ie d .
e s s e n tia l
lib r a r ie s
fo r
F in d in g s
th a t a r e a v a ila b le
a r e th e m a jo r
e x p e r tis e ,
s tu d ie d .
U n iv e r s ity ,
S o k o to .
packages
o u t th a t fu n c tio n a lity ,
im p e d e s
s e r v ic e s fr u s tr a tin g .
a n d s e r ia ls
c o n s o r tiu m
in th e ir
B e llo
U n iv e r s ity ,
a d o p te d
som e
lib r a r ie s
Ahm adu
to s ta n d a r d
th a t
u n d e r u tilis in g
in s ta L le d
enhancem ent
s h o u ld
th e m a jo r fa c to r s
a s in s tr u m e n t
u n iv e r s ity
s o ftw a r e
te c h n ic a l
of such
th e q u e s tio n n a ir e
D a n fo d iy o
packages
in a d e q u a te
u n iv e r s ity
o f th e s o ftw a r e
9 fr o m
I t w a s fo u n d
b y th e
th e s e le c tio n
im p le m e n ta tio n
th r e e
lib r a r ia n s ,
U sm anu
s o ftw a r e
packages
n e e d to a p p ly s p e c ia lis e d
21
a n d c o n fo r m ity
th a tfu n d in g ,
are
u s in g
in th e
a d o p te d
in flu e n c e d
c o m p le te
m anagem ent
s tu d ie d .
fe a tu r e
a p p lic a tio n
has m ade
lo a n , r e fe r e n c e
5fr o m
and
th a t
m e th o d ,
r e s p o n d e n ts
lib r a r ie s
S o ftw a r e
r e fe r e n c e
d e v e lo p m e n t
lib r a r ie s
K ano
s u p p ly
s tu d ie d
th a t h a m p e r
to s a m p le
P ackages
c r ite r ia
a s th e r e s e a r c h
used
sources
S o ftw a r e
th e
a r e th e lib r a r y
I t w a s a ls o d is c o v e r e d
u n s ta b le
lib r a r y
w as
V ir tu a a n d K O H A
s e r v ic e s ,
s e r v ic e s ,
am ong
u s e d b y th e u n iv e r s ity
and support
s e r v ic e s .
w as used
d is tr ib u te d
B ayero
th a t
M anagem ent
and
a n d th e c h a lle n g e s
Survey
r a n d o m ly
s a m p lin g
r e v e a le d
th e L ib r a r y
o p e r a tio n s
a d o p te d
a d o p te d .
w as
Random
Z a r ia ,
in v e s tig a te d
fo r
- in fo r m a tio n
recom m ended
o p e r a tio n s
lik e fu n c tio n a lity ,
m anagem ent
o f fu n d s
and
resource
th a t th e r e is
in c lu d in g
in te r
in te r o p e r a b ility ,
s o ftw a r e
e m p h a s iz e
and
th a t
o n s ta jJ
a n d d e v e lo p m e n t.
K e y w o r d s : L ib r a r y
L ib r a r ie s ,
M anagem ent
N o r th
S o ftw a r e
P ackages,
L ib r a r y
O p e r a tio n s
a n d S e r v ic e s ,
U n iv e r s ity
W e s t N ig e r ia
Introduction
excellent academic knowledge and sound life
skill. According to Iwe (2010), a Library is a
research engine of the society, situated in the
institutions of learning as well as in theONMLKJIH
The Library, as a segment of the university
community, is comprised ofstafT, information
resources and learning avenues where
students and teachers come together to pursue
29
J e w e l J o u r n a l o f L ib r a r ia n s lz ip C o m b e S ta te C h a p te r V o l.
communities for learning, teaching, research
and recreational purposes. The people in them
are immensely
talented,
rigorously
intelligent, indulging in activities above the
daily pursuits of the ordinary people. This
community
is consisting of professors,
doctorial scholars, men and women pursuing
mastery over various specific subject fields,
together
with youths
and teenagers
undertaking
the basic fundamentals
of
knowledge in diverse fields of learning. This
same community, as a result of its broad focus
in teaching, research and learning, create
knowledge and vital information that are
useful to humanity. Most importantly, the
knowledge
and information
created by
members of this community are compatible
with
the
culture
of the people.
8 N o .1 ·
example, Thomas (2012) defined library
management software as computer programs
that are written individually to operate
specific, tailor made procedures and systems
such as library
housekeeping,
words
processing,
database management,
text
retrieval, expert systems. Bierman (1980)
emphasized that the use of computers and
associated technologies to do exactly what
has been done in the library with the
justification of reduced cost or increased
performance.ZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA
S ta te m e n t o fth e P r o b le m
The application of Library Management
Software in the operations and services of
Nigerian university libraries has become
inevitable because of their impact in the
Meanwhile, Olmeda-Gomez, et al (2008)
changing
nature of library and information
described Universities
as generators of
work world over. However, inappropriate
scholarly knowledge, they pubJicise the
choice of software due to lack of feasibility
results of their research in both local and
studi.es, poor implementation and inadequate
international open articles, using the channels
requisite
staff skills to make optimal
afforded by existing journals to share their
utilization
of software adopted are bane to
findings as widely as possible with different
successful
Library automation in Nigerian
communities and audiences. This information
university Libraries. It is on this threshold that
openly publicized to serve a community,
this
study is set to look at how the interplay of
makes universities epistemic institutions and
these
different components affects library
makes them a distinct community.ONMLKJIHGFEDCBA
operation and services in Nigerian university
libraries,
The
C oncept
o f L ib r a r y
M anagem ent
S o ftw a r e
O b je c tiv e s
Library Management software is a sequence
of instructions that tells the computer what to
do, how to manipulate data and how to relate
to users. An essential requirement of Library
management software is that it should have
capabilities to:
a. Store and manipulate data
b. Provide the user with capability to
create a database
c. Enable the user to input his or her
information into the database created d. Edit data thereby allowing fer the
immediate correction of entry errors
or a correction at a later date.
The research has the following objectives:
I. To identify the types of Library
Management Software adopted in
Nigerian university libraries.
2. To examine the criteria that influenced
the selection of software they have
adopted.
3. To find out the challenges that are
responsible
for
the
poor
implementation and utilization of the
software adopted.
M e th o d o lo g y
The research design for this study is survey
method. Polit and Hungler (2009) described
survey as a method of gathering information
from a number of individuals known as
Library Management software has been
defined by different scholars based on their
background, experience-and
orientation. For
30
Jew el Journal
sample, in order to learn something about the
larger population from which the sample is
drawn. Professional and Para-Professional
Librarians from the University Libraries
under study form the population of this study.
The sampling technique used was random
sampling technique because of the belief that
there is no reason for anyone that is part of the
population to be different from the others with
respect
to the characteristics
under
investigation (Akuzuelo, 1993).
1.
Management
8 N o.
I
Integrated Library Management software
which include the following; Avanti,
MicroLCS, KOHA, Gnuteca, Evergreen,
OpenBibl'io,
PhpMyLibrary,
PhpMyBibli,
Innovative
Interfaces
Millennium,
CDS/ISIS,
WINt:;IS,
Software
For Universities
Library
(SOUL), Alice for windows (AFW).
LibInfo, MIDAS Library Management
System
(MIDAS
LMS).
Lil-sys;
SENAYAN, ABCCD, BiblioteQ. Virtua
(VTLS),
Tin Lib, Millenium
mi.
Alexandrian, SLAM, Library Suit, G;W
Library
Management
Sy s te rn
(GLIBSMS),
OpenBook,NewGenl ib .
X-LIB among others.
.
...~'
2. Digital Library Management System are
no longer only the digital counter part of
physical libraries (or physical museums.
video achives, etc.) rather they are
intricate networked systems capable of
supporting
communication
and
collaboration among different, worldwide
distributed user communities. Examples
of Digital Library Management System
include proprietary such as IBM digital
library, IBM Content Manager, Archival
Ware, CONTENTdm, Digitool, VITAL
etc and Open Source software packages
like DSpace, Greenstone, Eprints, Fedora,
Open Repository, CERN Document
Server Software (CDS Ware) among
others.
Review
Types of Library
Packages
G o m b e S ta le C h a p te r V o l.
According to Cullen, R. & Chanwer, J.
(2012), library application software packages
can categorised into the following:
The researchers distrbuted 'twenty one (21)
questionnaires through the Heads of Unit; 9
were administered
in Ahmadu
Bello
University,
Zaria,
7 went to Bayero
University, Kano and 5 were administered in
Usmanu Danfodiyo University, Sokoto. All
the questionnaires were completed, returned
and found useful for the study. The data was
collected
from the twenty
one (21)
respondents chosen from the three university
libraries under study. The data collected were
descriptively analyzed using frequency tables
and percentage statistic.
Literature
o f L ib r a r ia lls h ip
Software
Library Management software are computer
based programmes that are used to perform
library routine operations and services.
Dhanavandan
(2012)
defined
library
management software as the application of'
automatic and semi automatic data processing
machines to perform functions such as
acquisition, circulation, cataloguing, reference
service and serial control. Cullen and Chanwer
(2011) reported that there are generally two
3. Interlibrary loan /Electronic document
categories of library application software:
delivery software is another visible form
Proprietary and Open source. Proprietary
of resource sharing among libraries. The
Software refers to any computer software that
ILl,.. protocol
(ISO
10160:1997)
has' restrictions on the usage, modification,
developed by the National Library of
copying or distributing modi fied versions ofthe,
Canada has sought to automate this
software. Proprietary software may also be
process. It has become an ISO standard. "
called closed +source software. Open Source
in 1997. Wide implementation of. thi,s~:'}
Software (OSS) is computer software with its
,"~
protocol would reduce the gestatiorr'
source code made available and licensed in
period in the delivery of ILL request
which the copyright holder provides the right
considerably. Hosburgh and Okamoto
to study, change and distribute the software to
(20 I0) Iisted the examples of interl ibrary
anyone and for any purpose.ZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA
,
31
.,'ON
J e w e l J O llm a l o f L ib r a r ia lls h ip
C o m b e S ta te C h a p te r V o l.
8 N o .1
Furthermore, Reed, (2013) stated that very
few library software packages can meet all the
requirements ofa particular library. That, each
package has its own unique features and
limitations. Hence, it is necessary to evaluate
the library automation software with varying
facilities according .to the requirement. To
determine the best software package to be
chosen, it is important to analyze and identify
the needs of the library and match them with
the features and functions of the application
software.
loan or electronic document delivery
software to include the fax machine, Ariel,
Prospero, ILLiad's Odyssey, and RapidX
among others.
4. Serial Management Software systems can
be categorized into two main groups, viz.,
those that use inverted files and those that
use database systems. Prasad (2007)
outlined the following serial management
system software to include CUFTS as an
online serials knowledge base full-text
journal
collections
which provide
Libraries
with a searchable
serials
database from their web site, Electronic
Resource Management
(ERM) offers
essential electronic resource management
services, allowing a library to maintain the
information
about
its electronic
collections, including licensing terms,
renewal dates, contacts, etc. CUFTSERM
can send a librarian renewal notification,
reminding him of approaching deadlines.
It also allows the following information to
be added to facilitate serials management
e.g costs, renewal dates, licensing terms,
contacts and reports among others. Others
include Generalized Online Documents,
Ordering, and Texts (GO DOT), dbWIZ
which allows federated search also known
as meta search, broadcast search, parallel
search.
According
to Randhawa (2013), while
examining the software, the Librarian must
have the following information about the
software which might help them to select the
right software for housekeeping operations as
well as information retrieval: How it matches
the library's requirements product quality,
features and functions, staff training and
support service, Operating system, hardware
and software requirements
functionality:
What modules are available, value addition to
existing functions, user interface: navigation,
error alerts, intuitive, customization, design:
flexibility, switching from one module to
another, multifunction
modules, does it
enhance the productivity, conforming to
standards: MARC, Z39.50, ISO-2709, etc.
Scalability: single user-multi user network.
Can it be used in client server LAN
architecture
or fully web browsing
architecture, user-controlled customization,
reports that help to take decisions, security
levels migration of data or data transfer.
5.. Reference Management Software enables
an author to build a library of references
by entering the details of each reference in
a structured format. Many of these
packages
are Subscription
based
softwares like EndNote ,EndNote Web,
BibDesk,
JabRef,
ZoteroPapers,
Mendeley, Bookends, Citavi, Qiqqa,
RefWorks, ProCite, BibSonomy, BibTeX,
Reference Manager, Morris Messenger
and Ask a Librarian (ASKAL) among
others.ONMLKJIHGFEDCBA
F a c to r s
R e s p o n s ib le
I m p le m e n ta tio n
and
L ib r a r y M a n a g e m e n t
fo r
th e
U tiliz a tio n
Poor
of
th e
S o ftw a r e
There are many constraints to any kind of
application software implementation
and
utilization in university libraries. Gbadamosi
(2012) said that the implementation oflibrary
automation has faced varied problems and
challenges which may differ from institution
to institution depending on the disposition of
the institution to ICT application, funding and
C r ite r ia
I n flu e n c e d
th e
S e le c tio n
of
L ib r a r y M a n a g e m e n t S o ftw a r e P a c k a g e s
technical expertise of the librarian anchoring
the project. In the same vein, Ming (2000)
highlighted some of the pressing challenges
The success of automation depends on the
and problems to be hardware breakdown,
selection
of appropriate
software.ZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA
32
J e w e l J o u r n a l o f L ib r a r ia n s h ip
C o m b e S ta te C h a p te r V o l.
8 N o .1
unreliable electricity supply, poor Internet
connections, as well as a lack of adequate
computer equipment, appropriate software,
and even
technological
expertise
(Arunachalam, 2003).
software problems, unreliable power supply,
inadequate funding, staff training deficiency
and planned obsolescence of commercial
software.
Fabunmi (2006) has observed in his research
Similarly, Durrant (2004) pointed out that
that poor electricity supply is a major
impediment to the operation and growth of
lack of funding is another major problem
information and communication technology
experienced
by developing
country
in Nigerian universities. He further stated that
institutions in their effort to establish digital
repositories. The state ofICT infrastructure in
electricity supply is a major problem in
academic
and research
institutions
in
developing countries like Nigeria. This
developing countries like Nigeria is so low to
problem has made the development
of
sustain the development of institutional
projects like an institutional repository in
repositories. Hence a viable digital repository
Nigeria much difficult and expensive. While
27.4% of the respondents at the University of
project will first require serious upgrading of
the current state of ICT facilities in many
Lagos 'strongly
agree' that inadequate
information and communication technology
academic and research institutions in Nigeri.
infrastructure is a problem to the development
DataAnalysis and Discussion
of institutional repository at the university,
Details of the results and analysis of data ar..
46.8% 'agree' to that proposition. Various
presented in percentages using frequency
other researches has also confirmed that many
institutions in developing countries face anZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA
distribution table.
Table 1: Demographic
Characteristics
of Respondents
Academic Staff Members
Variables
Classification
Gender
Male
16
76.2
Female
5
23.8
Total
21
100
Professional Librarians
Para-Professional Librarians
14
7
66.6
33.3
Total
Staff Category
Qualification
Work
Experience
Frequency
Percentage
21
100
Masters & Above
First Degree
10
8
47.6
38.1
Diploma
Total
Below 5Yrs
-'"
14.3
5 - 10Yrs
10 Yrs & Above
Total
In table I above, the gender compositions of
respondents
were not proportionately
distributed. It was clear that the male
population is higher numbering (16:76.2%)
against the females with (5:8.7%). This may
be due to the fact that there are more male
Librarians than female Librarians working in
the university libraries in North-West Nigeria.
21
100
6
28.5
8
38.1
7
33.3
21
100
(%)
It was also discovered in this research that
Professional Librarians formed the highest
subject for this study with (14:66.6%) while
Para-Professional Librarians had (7:33.3%).
Findings
revealed
that Professional
Librarians are more conversant with Library
Management Software Packages than the
Para-Professional Librarians.
33
J e w e l J a l/m a l
a f U h r a r ia lls h ip
G a ll/h e S ta te C h a p te r V a l.
8 N o.
"1
Table 1 further revealed that university
(8:38.1 %) are first degree holders and
libraries in the North-West have competent
(3: 14.3%) has diploma. It was discovered that
number of staff that are managing library
again that these category of staff has good
application software packages. This was
working experience. Findings revealed that
confirmed by table 1 which showed that
(6:28.5%) has less than 5 years working
among the 21 staff sampled for the study,
experience, (8:38.1 %) has 5 to 10 years
(10:47.6%) has Masters degree and above,ZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA
experience and (7:33.3%) has over 10 years
working experience in the Library.
Table 2: Responses on the Types of Library
anagement Software Packages
Adopted for Library Operations and Services
Integrated
Application
Software Packages
Lj b r'ar'y Management
University
'.-
Libraries
BUK
ABU
X -LIB
Software
UDU
0/_
0 /0
FONMLKJIHGFEDCBA
F
'u
F
Total
~/o
·F
~/(j
TlN- LI~
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
ALICE FOR WINDOWS (AFW)
GLASS
LIBERTY
CDS/ISIS
VIRTUA (VTLS)
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
42.8
7
33.4
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
9
X
X
X
X
X
KOHA
SLAM
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
5
23.8
16
5
76.2
23.8
EVERGREEN
MILLENIUM
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
CDS Ware
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Digital Library
DSPACE
Enrints
Fedora
Greenstone
IBM digital Library
Archival Ware
Management
9
42.8
software
7
33.4
5
23.8
21
100
23.8
5
23.8
CONTENTdm
KEY
ABU
BUK
UDU
Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria
Bayer University, Kano
Usmau Danfodiyo University, Sokoto
In Table 2 above, the data collected from
respondents indicated that Ahmadu Bello
University and Bayero University, Kano
adopted Virtua (VTLS) and therefore
accounted for (16:76.2%). The reason for this
highest number of respondents received is due
to the fact that Virtua is open software that
does not require any financial implication to
acquire it, it consist of various modules that·is
required for almost all library operations and
services. This is in consonant with Cullen and
Chanwer (2012) where they remarked that
adoption of library application software
should be based on its interoperability,
flexibility, viability and ease of use. Similarly,
KOHA has (5:23.8%) of the respondents. The
reason for the choice of this software is
because of its design architecture which
satisfies the requirement needed by the
institution, staff skills and easy integration
with other repository software such as Dspace
or Eprints. Findings revealed that it shares
similar features and characteristics with any
other open software and can be concurrently
run with others for resource sharing. Table 1
also revealed that none of the University
Libraries studied used Tin lib, X-Lib,
CDS/ISIS, Glass, Liberty, Alice for Windows,
Libsy, E-lib, Strategic Library Automation &
Management, Millenium and EverGreen.
Again, the data collected from respondents
indicated that digitization is going on in the
34
J e w e l J O llr n a l o f L ib r a r ia lls lz ip C o m b e S ta te C h a p te r V o l.
university libraries under study. The three
universities; ABU, BUK, UDU adopted
Dspace digital asset management software for
their institutional repository and therefore
accounted for (21: 100%). This is because
Dspacc is open software, interoperable with
the ability to migrate the data to new formats
as old ones become obsolete and ability to
index documents
for easy searching,
retrieving and archiving. Usmanu Danfodiyo
University also adopted Greenstone
as
backend digital management software and has
(5:23.8%) of the respondents. The reason for
8 N o .1
the choice of this software is because of its
design architecture
which satisfies the
requirement
needed by the institution.
Findings revealed that each institution
reserves the liberty to choose its own software
vendor based on the design analysis, available
staff skills, experience, scope and goals of its
digitisation
project.
The researchers
discovered none of the universities studied is
specifically
making use of Interlibrary
Loan/Electronic
Document
Delivery
Software, Serials Management Software and
Reference Management Software because of
lack of funds and inadequate ski lIs.
Table 3: Responses on the Criteria Used in the Selection of Library
Management Software Packages
University
Criteria
for Selection
ABU
F
9
Libraries
BUK
F
7
7
7
4
5
5
4
3
2
2
X
%
Functionality
Staff training and support services
Open source
Conforming to standards
Flexibility
Operation modules
Design architecture
Productivity enhancement
42.8
9
9
7
5
5
3
..,.)
42.8
User Interface
Error alerts
Operating system
3
2
2
14.2
9.5
9.5
42.8
33.3
23.8
23.8
14.2
14.2
Total
UDU
%
33.4
33.4
33.4
19.4
23.8
23.8
19.4
14.2
9.5
9.5
X
F
5
5
5
4
5
5
..,.)
%
23.8
2
23.8
23.8
19.4
23.8
23.8
14.2
9.5
2
2
X
9.5
9.5
X
F
21
21
21
15
15
15
10
8
7
6
2
%
100
100
100
71.4
71.4
71.4
47.8
37.9
..,..,
..,
.).) ..)
28.6
9.5
KEY
ABU = Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria
BUK = Bayero University, Kano
UDU = Usmanu Danfodiyo University, Sokoto
Table 3 above showed that functionality of the
this could be attributed to the fact that
successful performance of such software
library application software, staff training and
support services and open source feature
depends largely upon the available service
scored the highest with (21: 100%) responses.
modules, the resources it contains and the
The researcher found out that apart from being
ability of the software to interoperate with
other repositories within the institution and
free, it also allows user to modify some
outside the institution. This is line with Reed,
features to meet their needs. Other criteria
(201.3) which stated that very few library
with high number of responses included
software
packages
can meet all the
conforming to standard, flexibility and
requirements of a particular library since each
operation module with (15:71.4%). Design
package has its own unique features and
architecture scored (10:47.8%) and operating
limitations.
system recorded
the least number of
responses with (2:9.5%). The implication ofZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA
35
J e w e l J o u r n a l o f L ih r a r ia n s h ip
T a b le 4 : R e s p o n s e s
o n F a c to r s R e s p o n s ib le
a n d U tiliz a tio n
fo r th e P o o r I m p le m e n ta tio n
o f th e L ib r a r y M a n a g e m e n t
Universitv
ABU
C h a lle n g e s
G O II/b e S ta te C h a p te r V o l. qponmlkjihgfe
8 N o .1 ONMLK
BUK
S o ftw a r e
L ib r a r ie s
UDU
T o ta l
F
0/0
F
0/0
F
%
F
0/0
9
42.8
7
33.4
5
23.8
21
lOa
9
9
7
5
42.8
42.8
33.4
33.4
19.4
:-:3.8
5
5
2
5
23.8
23.8
9.5
23.8
21
21
13
15
lOa
23.8
7
7
4
5
100
62.2
71.4
Poor Internet connectivity
5
23.8
5
23.8
5
23.8
15
71.4
Design architecture
J
"'
14.2
4
19.4
3
14.2
10
47.8
Funding
-Technical expert-i-se
Software obsolescence
Electricity
Hardware breakdown
"'"' "'
JJ.J
.,'
KEY:
ABU = Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria
BUK = Bayero University, Kano
UDU = Usmanu Danfodiyo University, Sokoto
Table 4 above indicated that university
libraries under study encountered many
challenges in the use of Library Application
Software Packages. Respondents indicated
there is problem of inadequate funding to
maintain and sustain application software
packages, inadequate technical know-how,
software obsolescence as new ones emerge
had highest number of responses with
(21: 100%). Respondents also pointed out that.
erratic power supply hinders the smooth
running of library operations
and had
(13:62.2%). This agreed with Fabunmi (2006)
who argued in his research that poor
electricity supply is a major impediment to the
operation and growth of information and
communication
technology
in Nigerian
university libraries. Design architecture of
Library Application Software had the least
number of responses with (10:47.8%). The
implication of this is that many respondents
do not have sufficient knowledge about the
design framework of these software packages
they are making use of.
major criteria that influence the choice of the
application software packages adopted for
lihrary operations and services. I t was also
d i "covered that funding (2: 100%), inadequate
technical expertise (21: 100%), hardware
breakdown
(21: 100%) and unstable
electricity supply (13:62.2%) are the major
factors
that
impedes
successful
implementation
of Library Application
Software Packages in the university libraries
studied,
C o n c I u s io n lR e c o m m e n d a tio n s
With respect to the above discussions, the
researcher presents adoption of Library
Management Software Packages for Library
operations and services to mean a technical
job that demand a highly trained library and
information science personnel who can
skilfully apply his/her experiences in training
to efficient automated library operations and
services. The researcher offered the following
recommendations
based on the research
findings:
R e s e a r c h F in d in g s
I.
It was discovered that among numerous
Integrated Library Management Software that
exists, Virtua (16:76.2%)
and KOHA
(5:23.8%) are the ones that are available and
being used by the university libraries studied.
The study revealed
that functionality
(21: 100%), staff training and support services
(21 :100%), open sources feature (21: I 00%)
and conformity to standard (15:71.4%) are the
36
There is the need to apply other software
packages likeInter library loan software,
Serial Management software, Reference
Management
Software;
Digital
Management
software
as far as
information delivery is concerned. This is
necessary in order to ensure that library
professionals
are exposed to diverse
application software which will give them
added advantage to work in various library
and information centers.
J e w e l J o u r n a l o f L ih r a r ia lls h ip
11.
There is the need to consider other
criteria
like
user
interface,
productivity
enhancement,
error
alerts,
and operating
system
among
others
when
selecting
software for adoption. This will
help significantly in checking the
rush for application that will be
used for a short time only to be
abandoned for another one.
G o m b e S ta te C h a p te r V o l.
8 N o .1
Durrant,
S. (2004). Overview ofInitiatives in
the Developing World. Retrieved on
2 2 1 01 1 2 0 1 4
from
http://drwin.nap.edu.lbooks/0309009
1454/htmlll22.htm
I
Dhanavandan, S. (2012). An Evaluative Study
of Automation
Software Application
and Database Management
Systems
in Academic
Libraries.
Journal of
E m e r g in g
I n fo r m a tio n
tr e n d s I n
C o m p u tin g
S c ie n c e s ,
vol.3
and
No.5,
677-679.
iii. Concerted and deliberate effort should
Fabunmi, B. A., Fabunmi, M. ~nd Paris, W.
be made to seek for grants and
(200.6).
Digitisation
of library
donors
as well as forming
a
resources:
Challenges
and
consortium
in order to bring to
Implications for Policy and Planning.
minimal the inadequate
funding
I n te r n a tio n a l J o u r n a l o f A fr ic a n &
and poor Internet connectivity.
A fr ic a n A m e r ic a n S tu d ie s , 5(2), 23High power inverters should be
36.
.
acquired to support the expensive
Gbadamosi,
B.O.
(2012).
Emerging
challenges
to effective
library
running
of standby
power
automation and E- library:
generating
plants to subdue the
The case of Emmanuel Alayande College of
issue of inadequate power supply.
Education,
Oyo, Nigeria.
L ib r a r y
Emphasis
should be placed on
p h ilo s o p h y A n d p r a c tic e . E - jo u r n a l.
stafftraining
and developments of
vo19No.29
librarians to enable them acquire
Hosbourgh,
N. & Okamoto,
K. (2010)
skills from other libraries
that
Electronic
Document
Delivery:
A
have already advanced in the area
survey
of
the
landscape
Horizon.
oflibrary automation.ONMLKJIHGFEDCBA
J o u r n a l o f in te r lib r a r y lo a n , D o c d e liv e r y a n d
e le c tr o n ic . Vol. 20, issue 4 Retrieved
R e fe r e n c e s
22/10/13
from
on
E. O. (1993).ZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA
R e s e a r c h M e th o d s
httpllwww.informawerld.com/smpp/
a n d S ta tis tic s . Nigeria: Nuel Centi.
content-db=all?
Content
Arunachalam,
S. (2003).
Reaching
the
10.1 0801072303x.20 10.502096
on
. unreached: what role can ICTs play in
22.
rural development? Paper Presented at
Ming,
S. (2000).
A ccess
to D ig ita l
the Asian Regional Conference of UN
I n fo r m a tio n : S o m e B r e a k th r o u g h a n d
ICT Task Force - Media Lab Asia,
O b s ta c le s , J o u r n a l o f L ib r a r ia n s h ip
New Delhi, 25 April.
a n d I n fo r m a tio n S c ie n c e ; 3 2 ( 1 ) .
Oonnell,
R., and Janke,
K. (2006).
Polit and Hungler (2009). B a s ic R e s e a r c h
Turnaround
time between ILLiad's
M e th o d s fo r
L ib r a r ia n s
t r e d .) .
odyssey and ariel delivery methods.
Greenwich,
Conn: Ablex Publishing
Akuezuilo,
Journal
of
I n te r lib r a r y
Loan,
D ocum ent
Corp.
Randhawa S. (2013). Open Source Library
Management
Software
Centre
for
Research
in Rural
Industrial
Development.
E lib r a r y
R esearch
& E le c tr o n ic R e s e r v e , 1 6 ( 3 ) ,
41-56. doi: 10. 1300lJ474v16n03 _07 ..
1. (2011). The
Cullen, R. & Chanwer,
Institutional
Repository
Oxford:
Chandos.
Retrieved
from
http://www.articleI9.org/pdfs/public
ationsllocal-content-rules.pdf.
on
D e liv e r y
J o u r n a l. V o l. 1.is s u e 7 ,p p .1 - 7 .
Reed, 1. (2013). Jira and Read Scale: Two
Tools Libraries Can Use to Enhance
Reporting of Reference Transactions.
Masters thesis. North Carolina.pp.I-5.
02110114.
37