
Stephen Sheehi
College of William and Mary, Asian and Middle East Studies Program, Sultan Qaboos Professor of Middle East Studies
(he/him) Scholar of 19th-20th century Middle East, interested in cultural and literary history, visual culture, liberation struggles, racism, anti-semitism and Islamophobia, and decolonial theory, Marxism, and psychoanalysis especially within the context of the Global South and marginalized communities.
Address: Decolonizing Humanities Project
Asian and Middle Eastern Studies Program
Asian and Pacific Islander American Studies Program
Modern Languages and Literatures Dept.
William & Mary
Williamsburg, VA (Turtle Island)
Address: Decolonizing Humanities Project
Asian and Middle Eastern Studies Program
Asian and Pacific Islander American Studies Program
Modern Languages and Literatures Dept.
William & Mary
Williamsburg, VA (Turtle Island)
less
Related Authors
Lara Sheehi
Doha Institute for Graduate Studies
Nouri Gana
University of California, Los Angeles
Abeer Otman
The Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Nadera Shalhoub
The Hebrew University of Jerusalem
marquard smith
UCL Institute of Education
InterestsView All (41)
Uploads
Papers by Stephen Sheehi
Sheehi and Sheehi document the stories of Palestinian clinicians in relation to settler colonialism and violence but, even more so, in relation to their patients, communities, families, and one another (as a clinical community). In doing so, they track the appearance of settler colonialism as a psychologically extractive process, one that is often effaced by discourses of "normalization," "trauma," "resilience," and human rights, with the aid of clinicians, as well as psychoanalysis.
Psychoanalysis Under Occupation: Practicing Resistance in Palestine unpacks the intersection of psychoanalysis as a psychological practice in Palestine, while also advancing a set of therapeutic theories in which to critically engage and "read" the politically complex array of conditions that define life for Palestinians living under Israeli occupation.
Sheehi and Sheehi document the stories of Palestinian clinicians in relation to settler colonialism and violence but, even more so, in relation to their patients, communities, families, and one another (as a clinical community). In doing so, they track the appearance of settler colonialism as a psychologically extractive process, one that is often effaced by discourses of "normalization," "trauma," "resilience," and human rights, with the aid of clinicians, as well as psychoanalysis.
Psychoanalysis Under Occupation: Practicing Resistance in Palestine unpacks the intersection of psychoanalysis as a psychological practice in Palestine, while also advancing a set of therapeutic theories in which to critically engage and "read" the politically complex array of conditions that define life for Palestinians living under Israeli occupation.
https://luminosoa.org/site/books/m/10.1525/luminos.126/
http://www.journalofvisualculture.org
The JVC Palestine Portfolio is an incredibly powerful, heartfelt, heart-wrenching, life-affirming and hopeful polyphony of reminiscences, art works, graphic designs, scholarly texts, critical writings, briefings, visual activism, petitions, and mobilisations. Thanks to Sage, it is free to access, and is available to download (and circulate widely, if you’re so inclined) on the Sage site (https://journals.sagepub.com/home/vcu) and here.
The JVC Palestine Portfolio with contributions by: Larissa Sansour, Rashid Khalidi, Mazen Kerbaj, The Mosaic Rooms, Strike MoMA, Ariella Azoulay, Danah Abdulla, Rounwah Adly Riyadh Bseiso, Hanan Toukan, Zeina Maasri, Adrian Lahoud and Jasbir K. Puar, Yoav Galai, Distributed Cognition Cooperative (Anna Engelhardt and Sasha Shestakova), Evyn Lê Espiritu Gandhi, Firas Shehadeh, Sami Khatib, Léopold Lambert/The Funambulist, Tina Sherwell, Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak, Rochelle Davis and Dan Walsh, Lina Hakim, Ariel Caine, Nida Sinnokrot/Sakiya, Yara Sharif, Visualizing Palestine, Nada Dalloul, Simone Browne, Rehab Nazzal, Lila Sharif, Oraib Toukan and Mohmoud M Alshaer, Mark Muhannad Ayyash, Omar Kholeif, Oreet Ashery, The Palestinian Museum, Kareem Estefan and Nour Bishouty, Ghaith Hilal Nassar, Adam Broomberg, Kamal Aljafari, Nicholas Mirzoeff, Palestinian Feminist Collective, W.J.T. Mitchell, Dar El-Nimer for Arts and Culture, Jill H. Casid, Macarena Gómez-Barris, Stephen Sheehi, Susan Greene, Sunaina Maira, and Shourideh C. Molavi and Eyal Weizman.
Preface:
The JVC Palestine Portfolio
Journal of Visual Culture’s Editorial Collective has a longstanding commitment to tracking and analyzing critically the continued unfolding of racialist, colonialist, and jingoistic discourses. The journal often provides a critical space wherein these discourses can be researched and debated so as to redress the social, political, and ethical injustices that continue to plague the world we share. Everything we do in this journal exists under the sign of Stuart Hall’s vital challenge: ‘We must mobilise everything [we] can find in terms of intellectual [and other] resources in order to understand what keeps making the lives we live and the societies we live in profoundly and deeply antihumane in their capacity to live with difference’.
As a Collective, then, we stand in solidarity with Palestinians against Israeli settler colonialism and the Apartheid that results from it.
Compelled to respond to the urgency of the moment instigated by the Israeli regime’s actions in Gaza in May and June 2021, which we also acknowledge as a part of the ongoing Nakbah and an extension of official policies of displacement and erasure since 1948, we sent out an email with the subject line: ‘Journal of Visual Culture for Palestine: a call to [name of recipient]’, asking for a favour, for cooperation, for a contribution. The email in full is as follows:
Download to read on...
Sheehi and Sheehi document the stories of Palestinian clinicians in relation to settler colonialism and violence but, even more so, in relation to their patients, communities, families, and one another (as a clinical community). In doing so, they track the appearance of settler colonialism as a psychologically extractive process, one that is often effaced by discourses of "normalization," "trauma," "resilience," and human rights, with the aid of clinicians, as well as psychoanalysis.
Psychoanalysis Under Occupation: Practicing Resistance in Palestine unpacks the intersection of psychoanalysis as a psychological practice in Palestine, while also advancing a set of therapeutic theories in which to critically engage and "read" the politically complex array of conditions that define life for Palestinians living under Israeli occupation.
The Arab Imago concentrates primarily on studio portraits by Arab and Armenian photographers in the late Ottoman Empire. Examining previously known studios such as Abdullah Frères, Pascal Sébah, Garabed Krikorian, and Khalil Raad, the book also provides the first account of other pioneers such as Georges and Louis Saboungi, the Kova Brothers, Muhammad Sadiq Bey, and Ibrahim Rif'at Pasha—as well as the first detailed look at early photographs of the annual pilgrimage to Mecca. In addition, the book explores indigenous photography manuals and albums, newspapers, scientific journals, and fiction.
Featuring extensive previously unpublished images, The Arab Imago shows how native photography played an essential role in the creation of modern Arab societies in Egypt, Palestine, Syria, and Lebanon before the First World War. At the same time, the book overturns Eurocentric and Orientalist understandings of indigenous photography and challenges previous histories of the medium.
Stephen Sheehi is the Sultan Qaboos bin Said Chair of Middle East Studies at the College of William and Mary. He is the author of Foundations of Modern Arab Identity and Islamophobia: The Ideological Campaign against Muslims.
Endorsements:
"We have been waiting for effective global histories of photography to disturb and decenter the questions we ask--not globalized histories, radiating out in a familiar narrative of export, influence, and derivation, but histories that start elsewhere. Stephen Sheehi’s The Arab Imago, a social history of indigenous photography in the Ottoman Arab world, is a model for this. It provincializes the history we have and irrevocably pluralizes both photographies and the interwoven modernities of which they were part."--John Tagg, Binghamton University, author of The Disciplinary Frame: Photographic Truths and the Capture of Meaning
"Hugely original, both empirically and theoretically, this is a superbly ambitious book. Sheehi helps the reader escape from the familiar landscape of colonial representation into the complex terrain of indigenous photography, which is filled with images and practices that will provoke new kinds of debates. The Arab Imago disorders a world we thought we knew in ways that will be highly productive."--Christopher Pinney, University College London, author of Photography and Anthropology
"The Arab Imago is a remarkable and timely book that will make a significant contribution to Middle East studies and to the theory and history of photography. Sheehi’s discussion of indigenous photography in the Arab world sheds new and much-needed light on photography’s other histories."--Ali Behdad, UCLA, author of Camera Orientalis: Reflections on Photography of the Middle East
"The Arab Imago successfully presents us with an alternative history of photography in the Arab world during the late Ottoman Empire. This original and informative book will be an important source for scholars and students of photography and Middle Eastern modernity."--Issam Nassar, Illinois State University, author of European Portrayals of Jerusalem
How is it that so many of these right-wing has-been academics are the worst time of committed right wing Zionists, so off the pale that even mainstream Israelis tend to avoid and disavowal them? Why is it that these failed (almost always male and white) academics become obsessed with progressive women, often women of color? And why is it that white feminists who often cape for white patriarchal power (including misogynistic Zionism in the form of the anti-women policies of the state of Israel) avoid calling out their predatory stalking, harassment, and creepy surveillance of these women of color.
This forthcoming article considers these questions in seriousness. Without psychopathologizing behavior that has otherwise been described as “unhinged,” the article discusses how failed academics target scholars of color and scholars of conscience who advocate for progressive causes in order to establish themselves in academic fields in which they have failed. Most frequently, these mediocre polemicists (almost always middle aged to retired white men) target high profile, productive, ground-breaking, and accomplished scholars around issues of Palestine and trans rights.
This paper will largely focus on the fields of psychoanalysis and cultural studies, choosing a handful of American, British, and Canadian ideologues whose otherwise puerile and unacademic attacks pose for "academic" critiques, which attempt to "cancel" progressive academics under the justification of "free academic speech". This paper is academic and bends away from the same sort of ad hominem attacks these sleazy wash-ups launch on scholars of conscience.
I will argue that these predatory opportunists manufactor or seek out to exacerbate and politicize what they then constitute as scandals. Their arguments are caped as a critique of “authoritarian wokeness” that threatens to upend white and male authority, thereby unleashing the debauchery of those who support trans and queer rights, the working poor, black and brown people and, of course, those who support Palestinian rights to self determination.
The "fault lines" within psychoanalysis as a field and, to some degree, "cultural studies" is one around a pedantic posture of what is intentionally misidentified as "identity politics." Therefore, the argument of this article will be twofold. These ideological hacks and pseudo-academics actively work to intimidate, harm, and incite violence against these scholars of conscience by flooding both the public sphere (via social media) and through their membership in and relationships with members in professional organizations. Likewise, what are the mechanisms that these failed academics that are not flunkies of state power use to harass and seek to harm their targets? How do they conscript and manipulate equally-unethical and ideologically committed students and internet-trolls, to quote an unnamed source, to “make their life [that of the targeted professor] a hell”?
Secondarily, these harassment and incitement campaigns offer talentless polemists and failed academics one last opportunity to gain celebrity and relevance for themselves in ways that their previous “scholarship” failed to do. While most credible scholars dismiss any work by these hack and rogue academics (as I have called them in other publications), their opportunism serves to establish their reputation in a small but dedicated community of ideologically motivated reactionaries, committed to silencing academic freedom.
The argument of this article builds on my previous work on "Teaching in the Teeth of Power" (found in Islamophobia: The Ideological Campaign Against Muslims [2011] and Anthony Nocella et al, ed Academic Repression [2010]). Like Islamophobia, this article will be supported by a myriad of sources: personal interviews, social media data and primary sources.
Sources will include personal writings and correspondences and documents exchanged between these predatory opportunistic academics, students (who collude with them), right wing organizations, and Israeli groups as well as court and legal records (for example, within psychology some of these predatory ideologues have lost their licenses in Canada and the United States because of ethics violation). Since these "scholars" work never undergoes actual peer review, I will be also discussing their on-line writing that they claim is "peer-reviewed" but is not but rather appear in highly ideological platforms usually run by singular people who have an clear academic agenda.
However, in a world marked by the mainstreaming of fascism (and the capitulations of the liberal parties), this article shows how these mediocre opportunists intentionally operationalize the climate of terror against progressive voices in order to amplify the impact of their slander to ostracize these scholars of conscience within academic institutions and professional organizations if not also incite bodily harm against them.