Biomedical scientist Dr. Andrea Love returns to WIRED to answer a new slate of the internet’s burning questions about pseudosciences, health fads, and false …
I lean towards trusting studies, but also recognize I’m not qualified to evaluate their quality. Coming from an environmental background, I also have skepticism around a lack of evidence of harm, which in the environmental field is often merely indicative of a lack of research, period. I don’t have time to stay up on the best available science myself, but the news is incentivized towards sensationalizing results, especially if they find any possible evidence of harm. In the environmental field, I pay more credence to anecdotal evidence than I used to. The material sciences / chemical industry has a bad track record of lying to the public and downplaying safety concerns — the incentives are against us. All too often, our bodies are the externalities.
Alternative medicine is easy for me to set aside because so much of it is wacky, but food and material sciences are harder for me to tell what’s legit. I’m also aware of the discrepancies in medical research for women especially, and the tendency for women’s health concerns to be invalidated.
With all these conflicting considerations, how to decide where I land?