Pablo Daut
Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary, Biblical Languages, Graduate Student
- historia de la Iglesia, Ancient Greek History, Ancient Greek Historiography, Herodotus, Fragmentary Greek Historiography, Greek Patristics, and 14 morePatristic Exegesis, Historical Theology, St. Augustine, Systematic Theology, Latin Patristics, Augustine, Early Christianity, New testament exegesis, Patristics, Religious Studies, New Testament, Theology, Apostle Paul and the Pauline Letters, and Church Historyedit
- Word of Life Bible Institute, Argentina (2007-2010), Biblical and Theological Studies
Universidade Santiago de Compostela (2012-2014), Classical Philology
Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary (2016-2022), M.Div. in Advanced & Biblical Studies.edit
Second Temple Jewish exegesis, as a hermeneutical school, proposes that the correct way to interpret the New Testament canonical writings is to approach and interpret them as a product of Second Temple Judaism, and bases this thesis on... more
Second Temple Jewish exegesis, as a hermeneutical school, proposes that the correct way to interpret the New Testament canonical writings is to approach and interpret them as a product of Second Temple Judaism, and bases this thesis on assuming a thematic and exegetical practices continuum and dependency with respect to the New Testament. It seems to be safe to assume that the New Testament writers did not pen their works in a literary vacuum; furthermore, there is ample proof that themes and hermeneutical practices during this period were—at least in some respect—picked up by them as they wrote and expanded their message and theology (and their respective emphases).
Research Interests:
After an examination of the positive and negative points of both sides, it will be concluded that assurance of salvation by faith alone goes hand in hand with the necessity of persevering to the end to attain eschatological salvation.
Research Interests:
A brief examination of differing exegetical approaches to Genesis 1, and the development of their main arguments, inevitably leads to the conclusion that the biblical creation account is best understood in its proper polemical/idolatrous... more
A brief examination of differing exegetical approaches to Genesis 1, and the development of their main arguments, inevitably leads to the conclusion that the biblical creation account is best understood in its proper polemical/idolatrous context (as a direct response to it) rather than in a modern-day scientific description of events.