TITLE
ARTHROPODICIDAL ARYL SULFONATES
The aryl sulfonates of this invention are
characterized by aryl and heteroaryl rings containing substituted alkylthio, alkylsulfinyl or alkylsulfonyl groups . These substituted groups distinguish the compounds of this invention from the aryl sulfonates of U.S. 4,791,127, U.S. 4,652,574 and U.S. 3,818,102.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
This invention pertains to compounds of Formula I, including all geometric and stereoisomers,
agriculturally suitable salts thereof, agricultural compositions containing them and their use for the control of arthropods and nematodes in both agronomic and nonagronomic environments. The compounds are
R1—SO2—O—Q
I wherein:
Q is selected from the group
and
R
1 is selected from the group C
1-C
3 alkyl and C
1-C
3 haloalkyl;
R2 is selected from the group H, C1-C2 alkyl, C1-C2 haloalkyl, C1-C2 alkoxy, C1-C2 haloalkoxy, C1-C2 alkylthio, C1-C2 haloalkylthio, C1-C2 alkylsulfinyl, C1-C2 haloalkylsulfinyl, C1-C2 alkylsulfonyl, C1-C2 haloalkylsulfonyl, amino, C1-C2 alkylamino, C2-C4 dialkylamino, C2-C3 alkoxycarbonyl; phenyl optionally substituted with halogen, CN or NO2; halogen; NO2; and CN;
R3 is selected from the group C1-C6 alkyl
substituted with R6, C3-C6 alkenyl substituted with R6, C3-C6 alkynyl substituted with R7 and C4-C7 cycloalkylalkyl optionally substituted with R8; wherein when R3 is C3-C6 alkenyl substituted with R7 and R7 is 1 to 3 halogens, then n is 0 or 1;
R4 and R5 are independently selected from the group C1-C6 alkyl substituted with R9, C2-C6 alkenyl substituted with R10, and C2-C6 alkynyl
substituted with R10;
R6 is selected from the group CN, SCN, NO2, OH,
OR11, SR11, S(O)R11, SO2R11, OC(O)R11, OSO2R11, Sl(R11) (R12) (R13), CO2R11, C(O)N(R11)R12, C(O)R11 and N(R11)R12;
R7 is selected from the group 1-3 halogens, C1 -C3 alkyl, CN, SCN, NO2, OH, OR11, SR11, S(O)R11, SO2R11, OC(O)R11, OSO2R11, Si(R11) (R12) (R13), CO2R11, C(O)N(R11)R12, C(O)R11 and N(R11)R12; R8 is selected from the group 1-3 halogens, CN and C1-C2 alkyl;
R9 is selected from the group CN, SCN, NO2, OH,
OR14, SR14, S(O)R11, SO2R11, OC(O)R11, OSO2R11, Si(R11)(R12)(R13), CO2R11, C(O)N(R11)R12, C(O)R11 and N(R11)R12;
R10 is selected from the group 1-3 halogens, C1-C3 alkyl, CN, SCN, NO2, OH, OR11, SR11, S(O)R11, SO2R11, OC(O)R11, OSO2R11, Si (R11) (R12) (R13), CO2R11, C(O)N(R11)R12, C(O)R11 and N(R11)R12; R11, R12 and R13 are independently selected from the group C1-C3 alkyl and C1-C3 haloalkyl;
R14 is selected from C1-C3 haloalkyl; and
n is 0, 1 or 2. Preferred Compounds A are compounds of Formula I wherein:
R1 is CH3;
R2 is selected from the group H, CH3, halogen, CF3 and CN;
R6 is selected from the group CN, SCN,
Si(R11) (R12) (R13), OR11 and SR11;
R7 is selected from the group 1-3 halogens, CN,
SCN, Si(R11) (R12) (R13), OR11 and SR11;
R9 is selected from the group CN, SCN,
Si(R11) (R12) (R13), OR14 and SR14; and
R10 is selected from the group 1-3 halogens, CN,
SCN, Si(R11) (R12) (R13), OR11 and SR11.
Preferred Compounds B are compounds of Preferred A wherein Q is Q-1. Preferred Compounds C are compounds of Preferred A wherein Q is Q-2. Preferred Compounds D are compounds of Preferred A wherein Q is Q-3.
Some of the compounds of this invention can exist as one or more stereoisomers. The various
stereoisomers include enantiomers, diastereomers and geometric isomers. One skilled in the art will appreciate that one stereoisomer may be more active than the others and how to separate said
stereoisomers. Accordingly, the present invention comprises racemic mixtures, individual stereoisomers, and optically active mixtures of compounds of Formula I as well as agriculturally suitable salts thereof.
In the above recitations, the term "alkyl" used either alone or in compound word such as "haloalkyl", denotes straight or branched alkyl such as methyl, ethyl, n-propyl, isopropyl, or the different butyl, pentyl or hexyl isomers. Alkoxy denotes methoxy and ethoxy. Alkenyl denotes straight or branched chain alkenes such as vinyl, 1-propenyl, 2-propenyl, 3-propenyl and the different butenyl, pentenyl and hexenyl isomers. Alkynyl denotes straight chain or branched alkynes such as ethynyl, 1-propynyl, 3-propynyl and the different butynyl, pentynyl and hexynyl isomers. Cycloalkylalkyl denotes cyclopropyl, cyclobutyl, cyclopentyl and cyclohexyl attached to a straight or branched C1-C4 alkylene group.
The term "halogen", either alone or in compound words such as "haloalkyl", denotes fluorine, chlorine, bromine or iodine. Further, when used in compound words such as "haloalkyl" said alkyl may be partially or fully substituted with halogen atoms, which may be the same or different. Examples of haloalkyl include CH2CH2F, CF2CF3 and CH2CHFCl. The terms "haloalkenyl" and "haloalkynyl" are defined analogously to the term "haloalkyl".
The total number of carbon atoms in a substituent group is indicated by the "Ci-Cj" prefix where i and j are numbers from 1 to 7. For example, C2
alkoxycarbonyl designates C(O)OCH3 and C3
alkoxycarbonyl designates C(O)OCH2CH3.
DETAILS OF THE INVENTION
Compounds of Formula I can be prepared by the reaction of hydroxyaryl compounds of Formula II with an alkylsulfonylating reagent such as an alkylsulfonyl halide or an alkylsulfonic acid anhydride. This reaction is generally conducted in a solvent and typically employs a base to initiate the reaction and quench the liberated acid by-product. Suitable
solvents include, tetrahydrofuran, diethyl ether, methylene chloride, chloroform, benzene and toluene. Examples of typical bases include triethylamine and pyridine. The reactions are usually run at
temperatures in the range of about 0° to 30°C. This reaction is depicted in Scheme 1.
Scheme 1
X = Cl or OSO 2R1 The sulfoxide (I, n=1) and sulfone (I, n=2) derivatives of Formula I are generally prepared from the sulfide derivatives (I, n=0). Oxidation to the sulfoxide can be achieved with a variety of oxidative reagents such as hydrogen peroxide, m-chloroperbenzoic acid, sodium periodate and t-butylhypochlorite. To minimize or prevent over oxidation, stoichiometric amounts of the oxidative reagent can be employed. For example, one equivalent of 30% hydrogen peroxide at room temperature is usually sufficient to convert a sulfide to a sulfoxide. Sulfoxides can be further oxidized to the sulfone by an additional equivalent of 30% hydrogen peroxide and may require higher
temperatures. Other reagents for the oxidation of sulfoxides to sulfones include potassium permanganate and peracetic acid. In the presence of sufficient oxidizing agent, sulfides can be directly oxidized to the sulfone. Scheme 2 depicts these transformations.
Scheme 2
Ar = benzene, pyridine, thiazole; R = R3, R4, R5
Intermediate hydroxyaryl compounds of Formula II can be prepared as depicted in Schemes 3, 4 and 5. The key step in the synthesis of each of these intermediates is the alkylation of an aryl or heteroaryl mercaptan (III, VI and VII) with a substituted alkyl, alkenyl or alkynyl halide (i.e. R3X, R4X and R5X) where X is a halogen leaving group such as chlorine, bromine or iodine.
Scheme 5
EXAMPLE 1
6-[[(Trimethylsilyl)methyl]thiol-2-pyridinol
methanesulfonate (ester)
Step A: 2-Methoxy-6-[[(4-methoxyphenyl)methyl]thio]- pyridine
To a mixture of 60% sodium hydride (25.9 g,
0.648 mol) in 400 mL of dimethylformamide was added a mixture of 4-methoxy-α-toluenethiol (100 g, 0.648 mol) in 100 mL of dimethylformamide at a rate that produced a slow evolution of hydrogen. Once the addition was complete, 2-chloro-6-methoxy pyridine was added in one portion and the mixture was heated at 70°C overnight. The mixture was then partitioned between 5% aqueous sodium bicarbonate and ether. The ether extracts were dried over magnesium sulf ate and concentrated.
Distillation of the crude product afforded 71.28 g of a fraction boiling at 148-183°C which consisted primarily of the title compound by NMR. 1H NMR (CDCI3) 5 3.78 (s,3H), 3.95 (s,3H), 4.39 (s,2H), 6.44 (d, 1H), 6.76 (d,1H), 6.83 (d, 2H), 7.3-7.5 (m,4H).
Step B: 6-Methoxy-2-pyridinethiol
A mixture of 2-methoxy-6-[[(4-methoxyphenyl)methyl]-thio]pyridine (71.28 g,
0.273 mol), anisole (35.2 mL, 0.328 mol) and 300 mL of trifluoroacetic acid was heated at reflux, under nitrogen, for 3 days. After this time, the
trifluoroacetic acid was removed on a rotary
evaporator, 1000 mL of 10% sodium acetate was added, and the mixture was extracted with chloroform. The aqueous phase was then washed twice with ethyl
acetate, the chloroform and ethyl acetate extracts were combined, dried over magnesium sulfate and concentrated. Trituration of the crude product with ether afforded 24.94 g of the product as a light yellow solid, mp 129-132°C. 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 3.91 (s,3H), 6.37 (d,1H), 6.85 (d, 1H), 7.38 (t,1H).
Step C: 2-Methoxy-6-[[(trimethylsilyl)methyl]thio]- pyridine
A mixture of 6-methoxy-2-pyridinethiol (1.5 g, 10.6 mmol), potassium carbonate (2.6 g, 19.1 mmol) and chloromethyltrimethylsilane (1.7 g, 13.8 mmol) in 25 mL of dimethylformamide was heated at 60°C
overnight. The reaction was cooled to room
temperature and partitioned between ether and 5% aqueous sodium bicarbonate, the ether extracts were washed with water, dried over magnesium sulfate and concentrated. Chromatography on silica gel (95:5 hexane:ethyl acetate) afforded 1.72 g of product as a clear, colorless oil. 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 0.15 (s,9H), 2.35 (s,2H), 3.94 (s,3H), 6.40 (d, 1H), 6.78 (d, 1H), 7.38 (t,1H).
Step D: 6-[[(trimethylsilyl)methyl]thiol-2-pyridinol methanesulfonate (ester)
A mixture of 2-methoxy-6- [[(trimethylsilyl)methyl]thio]pyridine (0.75 g,
3.30 mmol) in 3.0 mL of acetic acid and 1.2 mL of of 48% HBr was heated at reflux under nitrogen for
2 hours. After this time, the reaction was diluted with toluene and concentrated. To the crude product was added 5 mL of water and then 1N sodium hyroxide until a pH of greater than 7 was reached. Then, 1N hydrochloric acid was added until pH 4 was achieved. Ethyl acetate was added and the mixture was stirred several minutes until a homogeneous solution was obtained. The product was extracted twice with ethyl acetate, the organic extracts were dried over
magnesium sulfate and concentrated to 0.63 g of a yellow solid. The crude product was taken up in 15 mL of tetrahydrofuran and methanesulfonyl chloride
(0.26 mL, 3.30 mmol) was added. After cooling to 0°C under nitrogen, triethylamine (0.55 mL, 3.63 mmol) was added and the reaction was slowly warmed to room temperature. The reaction was stirred overnight and then partitioned between methylene chloride and water, the organic extracts were dried over magnesium
sulfate, and concentrated to 1.05 g of a brown oil. Chromatography on silica gel (8:2 hexane: ethyl
acetate) followed by distillation with a Kugelrohr apparatus afforded 0.22 g of the title compound as a clear colorless oil which set up to a white solid, mp 59°-61°C. 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 0.16 (s,9H), 2.29
(s,2H), 3.50 (s,3H), 6.77 (d, 1H), 7.17 (d, 1H), 7.60 (t,1H).
EXAMPLE 2
6-[(3,4,4-trifluoro-3-butenyl)thio]-2-pyridinol methanesulfonate (ester)
The procedures described in Steps B through D of Example 1 using 0.75 g of 6-methoxy-2-pyridinethiol and 1.3 g of 4-bromo-1,1,2-trifluorobutene afforded 0.94 g of the product as a clear, colorless oil which on standing set up to a white solid, mp 48°-52°C.
1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 2.7-2.9 (m, 2H), 3.31 (t,2H), 3.44 (s,3H), 6.82 (d,1H), 7.18 (d,1H), 7.63 (t,1H).
EXAMPLE 3
6-[(3-cyanoρropyl)thio]-2-pyridinol methanesulfonate
(ester)
The procedures described in Steps B through D of Example 1 using 0.75 g of 6-methoxy-2-pyridinethiol and 0.72 g of 4-chlorobutyronitrile afforded 1.28 g of the product as a white solid, mp 80°-84°C. 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 2.10 (m,2H), 2.54 (t,2H), 3.27 (t, 2H), 3.44 (s,3H), 6.78 (d,1H), 7.16 (d,1H), 7.62 (t, 1H).
EXAMPLE 4
6-[(3-cyanopropyl)sulfinyl]-2-pyridinol methanesulfonate (ester)
A mixture of 6-[(3-cyanopropyl)thio]-2-pyridinol methanesulfonate (ester) (0.75 g, 2.76 mmol), 0.5 mL of 30% hydrogen peroxide and 10 mL of acetic acid was stirred at room temperature, under nitrogen,
overnight. The acetic acid was then neutralized with 5% aqueous sodium bicarbonate and the aqueous phase extracted twice with ethyl acetate. The organic extracts were dried over magnesium sulfate and
concentrated. Chromatography on silica gel with ethyl acetate as eluent afforded 0.89 g of the title
compound as a clear, colorless oil. 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 1.92 (m,1H), 2.35 (m,1H), 2.55 (t,2H), 3.15 (m, 1H), 3.28 (m,1H), 3.48 (s,3H), 7.22 (d, 1H), 7.97 (d, 1H), 8.10 (t,1H).
EXAMPLE 5
6-[(3-cyanopropyl)sulfonyl]-2-pyridinol methanesulfonate (ester)
A mixture of 6-[(3-cyanopropyl)thio]-2-pyridinol methanesulfonate (ester) (0.75 g, 2.76 mmol), 1.0 mL of 30% hydrogen peroxide and 10 mL of acetic acid was heated at 90°C, under nitrogen, overnight. The acetic acid was then neutralized with 5% aqueous sodium bicarbonate and the aqueous phase extracted twice with ethyl acetate. The organic extracts were dried over magnesium sulfate and concentrated. Chromatography on silica gel (1:1 ethyl acetate :hexane) afforded 0.90 g of the title compound as a clear, colorless oil.
1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 2.12 (m,2H), 2.62 (t,2H), 3.50 (t,2H), 3.56 (s,3H), 7.40 (d, 1H), 8.09 (d,1H), 8.16 (t,1H).
EXAMPLES 6 and 7
6-[(3,4,4-trifluoro-3-butenyl)sulfonyl]-2-pyridinol methanesulfonate (ester); and 6-[(3,4,4-trifluoro-3-butenyl)sulfinyl]-2-pyridinol methanesulfonate (ester) A mixture of 6-[(3,4,4-trifluoro-3-butenyl)thio]-2-pyridinol methanesulfonate (ester) (0.79 g,
2.52 mmol), 0.5 mL of 30% hydrogen peroxide and 10 mL of acetic acid was stirred at room temperature, under nitrogen, for 48 hours. The acetic acid was then neutralized with saturated aqueous sodium bicarbonate and the aqueous phase extracted with ethyl acetate. The organic extracts were dried over magnesium sulfate and concentrated. Chromatography on silica gel (1:1 ethyl acetate :hexane) afforded two products. The higher Rf product (Example 6) (Rf approximately 0.6, 1:1 ethyl acetate :hexane) was determined by NMR to be the sulfonyl derivative, and the lower Rf product (Example 7) (Rf approximately 0.2, 1:1 ethyl
acetate :hexane) was determined by NMR to be the sulfinyl derivative. Example 6: 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 2.8-2.9 (m,2H), 3.54 (s,3H), 3.57, (t,2H), 7.41 (d, 1H),
8.08 (d,1H), 8.15 (t,1H). Example 7: 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 2.4-2.7 (m,1H), 2.7-3.0 (m, 1H) 3.15 (m,1H), 3.35 (m,1H), 3.46 (s,3H), 7.22 (d,1H), 7.98 (d,1H), 8.10 (t, 1H).
By the procedures described herein the following compounds of Tables 1 to 3 can be prepared. The compounds in Table 1, line 1 can be referred to as 1-1, 1-2, and 1-3 (as designated by line and column). All the other specific compounds covered in these Tables can be designated in an analogous fashion.
Formulation/Utility
Compounds of this invention will generally be used in formulation with an agriculturally suitable carrier comprising a liquid or solid diluent or an organic solvent. Thus, the arthropodicidal compositions of the present invention comprise an effective amount of a .compound of Formula I and at least one of (a) a surfactant, (b) an organic solvent, and (c) at least one solid or liquid diluent. Useful formulations include dusts, granules, baits, pellets, solutions,
suspensions, emulsions, wettable powders, emulsifiable concentrates, dry flowables and the like, consistent with the physical properties of the active ingredient, mode of application and environmental factors such as soil type, moisture and temperature. Sprayable formulations can be extended in suitable media and used at spray volumes from about one to several hundred liters per hectare. High strength
compositions are primarily used as intermediates for further formulation. The formulations will typically contain effective amounts of active ingredient, diluent and surfactant within the following
approximate ranges which add up 100 weight percent.
Weight Percent
Active
Ingredient Diluent Surfactant
Wettable Powders 25-90 0-74 1-10
Oil Suspensions, 5-50 40-95 0-15
Emulsions, Solutions,
(including Emulsifiable
Concentrates)
Dusts 1-25 70-99 0-5
Granules, Baits and 0.01-99 5-99.99 0-15
Pellets
High Strength 90-99 0-10 0-2
Compositions Typical solid diluents are described in Watkins, et al., Handbook of Insecticide Dust Diluents and Carriers, 2nd Ed., Dorland Books, Caldwell, New
Jersey. Typical liquid diluents and solvents are described in Marsden, Solvents Guide, 2nd Ed.,
Interscience, New York, 1950. McCutcheon 's Detergents and Emulsifiers Annual, Allured Publ. Corp.,
Ridgewood, New Jersey, as well as Sisely and Wood, Encyclopedia of Surface Active Agents, Chemical Publ.
Co., Inc., New York, 1964, list surfactants and recommended uses. All formulations can contain minor amounts of additives to reduce foam, caking,
corrosion, microbiological growth, etc.
Solutions are prepared by simply mixing the ingredients. Fine solid compositions are made by blending and, usually, grinding as in a hammer mill or fluid energy mill. Water-dispersible granules can be produced by agglomerating a fine powder composition; see for example. Cross et al., Pesticide Formulations, Washington, D.C., 1988, pp 251-259. Suspensions are prepared by wet-milling; see, for example, U.S.
3,060,084. Granules and pellets can be made by spraying the active material upon preformed granular carriers or by agglomeration techniques. See
Browning, "Agglomeration", Chemical Engineering,
December 4, 1967, pp 147-148, Perry 's Chemical
Engineer 's Handbook, 4th Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 1963, pages 8-57 and following, and WO 91/13546.
Pellets can be prepared as described in U.S.
4,172,714. Water-dispersible and water-soluble granules can also be prepared as taught in DE
3,246,493.
For further information regarding the art of formulation, see U.S. 3,235,361, Col. 6, line 16 through Col. 7, line 19 and Examples 10-41; U.S.
3,309,192, Col. 5, line 43 through Col. 7, line 62 and Examples 8, 12, 15, 39, 41, 52, 53, 58, 132, 138-140, 162-164, 166, 167 and 169-182; U.S. 2,891,855, Col. 3, line 66 through Col. 5, line 17 and Examples 1-4;
Klingman, Weed Control as a Science, John Wiley and
Sons, Inc., New York, 1961, pp 81-96; and Hance et al.. Weed Control Handbook, 8th Ed., Blackwell
Scientific Publications, Oxford, 1989.
In the following Examples, all percentages are by weight and all formulations are worked up in
conventional ways. Compound numbers refer to
compounds in Index Table A.
Example A
Wettable Powder
Compound 1 65.0% dodecylphenol polyethylene glycol ether 2.0% sodium ligninsulfonate 4.0% sodium silicoaluminate 6.0% montmorillonite (calcined) 23.0%.
Example B
Granule
Compound 1 10.0% attapulgite granules (low volative
matter, 0.71/0.30 mm; U.S.S. No.
25-50 sieves) 90.0%.
Example C
Extruded Pellet
Compound 1 25.0% anhydrous sodium sulfate 10.0% crude calcium ligninsulfonate 5.0% sodium alkylnaphthalenesulfonate 1.0% calcium/magnesium bentonite 59.0%.
Example D
Emulsifiable Concentrate
Compound 1 20.0% blend of oil soluble sulfonates
and polyoxyethylene ethers 10.0% isophorone 70.0%.
The compounds of this invention exhibit activity against a wide spectrum of foliar-feeding, fruit-feeding, seed-feeding, aquatic and soil-inhabiting arthropods (term "arthropods" includes insects, mites and nematodes) which are pests of growing and stored
agronomic crops, forestry, greenhouse crops,
ornamentals, nursery crops, stored food and fiber products, livestock, household, and public and animal health. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that not all compounds are equally effective against all pests. Nevertheless, all of the compounds of this invention display activity against pests that include: eggs, larvae and adults of the Order Lepidoptera;
eggs, foliar-feeding, fruit-feeding, root-feeding, seed-feeding larvae and adults of the Order
Coleoptera; eggs, immatures and adults of the Orders Hemiptera and Homoptera; eggs, larvae, nymphs and adults of the Order Acari; eggs, immatures and adults of the Orders Thysanoptera, Orthoptera and Dermaptera; eggs, immatures and adults of the Order Diptera; and eggs, junveniles and adults of the Phylum Nematoda. The compounds of this invention are also active against pests of the Orders Hymenoptera, Isoptera, Siphonaptera, Blattaria, Thysanura and Pscoptera;
pests belonging to the Class Arachnida and Phylum Platyhelminth.es. The compounds are particularly active against southern corn rootworm (Dia-brotica undecijπpunctata howardi), aster leafhopper
(Mascrosteles fascifrons) , boll weevil (Anti-o.no-7.us grandis), two-spotted spider mite (Tetranychus
urticae), fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda), black bean aphid (Aphis fabae) , tobacco budworm (Heliothis virescens), rice water weevil (Lissorhoptrus
oryzophilus), rice leaf beetle (Oulema oryzae) , whitebacked planthopper (Sogatella furcifera) , green leafhopper (Nephotettix cincticeps), brown planthopper (Nilaparvata lugens) , small brown planthopper
(Laodelphaκ striatellus) , rice stem borer ( Chilo suppressalis), rice leafroller (Cnaphalocrocis
medinalis), black rice stink bug (Scotinophara
lurida) , rice stink bug (Lagynotomus elongatus), rice bug (Leptocorisa chinensis) , slender rice bug ( Cletus puntiger) , and southern green stink bug (Nezara viridula) . See WO 90/10623 and WO 92/00673 for more detailed pest descriptions.
Compounds of this invention can also be mixed with one or more other insecticides, fungicides,
nematocides, bactericides, acaricides, semiochemicals, repellants, attractants, pheromones, feeding
stimulants or other biologically active compounds to form a multi-component pesticide giving an even broader spectrum of agricultural protection. Examples of other agricultural protectants with which compounds of this invention can be formulated are: insecticides such as avermectic B, monocrotophos, carbofuran, tetrachlorvinphos, malathion, parathion-methyl, methomyl, chlordimeform, diazinon, deltamethrin, oxamyl, fenvalerate, esfenvalerate, permethrin, profenofos, sulprofos, triflumuron, diflubenzuron, methoprene, buprofezin, thiodicarb, acephate,
azinphosmethyl, chlorpyrifos, dimethoate, fipronil, flufenprox, fonophos, isofenphos, methidathion, metha-midophos, phosmet, phosphamidon, phosalone,
pirimicarb, phorate, terbufos, trichlorfon,
methoxychlor, bifenthrin, biphenate, cyfluthrin, fenpropathrin, fluvalinate, flucythrinate,
tralomethrin, metaldehyde and rotenone; fungicides such as carbendazim, thiuram, dodine, maneb,
chloroneb, benomyl, cymoxanil, fenpropidine,
fenpropimorph, triadimefon, captan, thiophanate-methyl, thiabendazole, phosethyl-Al, chlorothalonil, dichloran, metalaxyl, captafol, iprodione, oxadixyl, vinclozolin, kasugamycin, myclobutanil, tebuconazole, difenoconazole, diniconazole, fluquinconazole,
ipconazole, metconazole, penconazole, propiconazole,
uniconzole, flutriafol, prochloraz, pyrifenox,
fenarimol, triadimenol, diclobutrazol, copper
oxychloride, furalaxyl, folpet, flusilazol,
blasticidin S, diclomezine, edifenphos,
isoprothiolane, iprobenfos, mepronil, neo-asozin, pencycuron, probenazole, pyroquilon, tricyclazole, validamycin, and flutolanil; nematocides such as aldoxycarb, fenamiphos and fosthietan; bactericides such as oxytetracyline, streptomycin and tribasic copper sulfate; acaricides such as binapacryl, oxythioquinox, chlorobenzilate, dicofol, dienochlor, cyhexatin, hexythiazox, amitraz, propargite,
tebufenpyrad and fenbutatin oxide; and biological agents such as Bacillus thuringiensis and baculovirus.
In certain instances, combinations with other arthropodicides having a similiar spectrum of control but a different mode of action will be particularly advantageous for resistance management.
Arthropod pests are controlled and protection of agronomic crops, animal and human health is achieved by applying one or more of the compounds of this invention, in an effective amount, to the environment of the pests including the agronomic and/or
nonagronomic locus of infestation, to the area to be protected, or directly on the pests to be controlled. Thus, the present invention further comprises a method for the control of foliar and soil inhabiting
arthropods and nematode pests and protection of agronomic and/or nonagronomic crops, comprising applying one or more of the compounds of Formula I, or compositions containing at least one such compound, in an effective amount, to the environment of the pests including the agronomic and/or nonagronomic locus of infestation, to the area to be protected, or directly on the pests to be controlled. A preferred method of
application is by spraying. Alternatively, granular formulations of these compounds can be applied to the plant foliage or the soil. Other methods of
application include direct and residual sprays, aerial sprays, seed coats, systemic uptake, baits, eartags, boluses, foggers, fumigants, aerosols, and many others. The compounds can be incorporated into baits that are consumed by the arthropods or in devices such as traps and the like.
The compounds of this invention can be applied in their pure state, but most often application will be of a formulation comprising one or more compounds with suitable carriers, diluents, and surfactants and possibly in combination with a food depending on the contemplated end use. A preferred method of
application involves spraying a water dispersion or refined oil solution of the compounds. Combinations with spray oils, spray oil concentrations, spreader stickers, adjuvants, and synergists and other solvents such as piperonyl butoxide often enhance compound efficacy.
The rate of application required for effective control will depend on such factors as the species of arthropod to be controlled, the pest's life cycle, life stage, its size, location, time of year, host crop or animal, feeding behavior, mating behavior, ambient moisture, temperature, and the like. Under normal circumstances, application rates of about 0.01 to 2 kg of active ingredient per hectare are
sufficient to control pests in agronomic ecosystems, but as little as 0.001 kg/hectare may be sufficient or as much as 8 kg hectare may be required. For
nonagronomic applications, effective use rates will range from about 1.0 to 50 mg/square meter but as
little as 0.1 mg/square meter may be sufficient or as much as 150 mg/square meter may be required.
The following TESTS demonstrate the control efficacy of compounds of this invention on specific pests. The pest control protection afforded by the compounds is not limited, however, to these species. See Index Tables A, B and C for compound descriptions.
TEST A
Southern Corn Rootworm
The units, each consisting of an 8-ounce (230 mL) plastic cup containing a one-inch square of a soybean- wheat germ diet were prepared. Solutions of each of the test compounds (acetone/distilled water 75/25) were sprayed into the cup. Spraying was accomplished by passing the cup, on a conveyor belt, directly beneath a flat fan hydraulic nozzle which discharged the spray at a rate of 0.5 pounds active ingredient per acre (about 0.55 kg/ha) at 30 psi (207 kPa).
After the spray on the cups had dried, five second- instar larvae of the southern corn rootworm
(Diabrotica undecimpunctata howardi) were placed into each cup. The cups were then covered and held at 27°C and 50% relative humidity for 48 hours, after which time mortality readings were taken. Of the compounds tested, the following gave mortality levels of 80% or higher: 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 46, 47, 50, 51, 53, 54, 56.
TEST B
Aster Leafhopper
Test units were prepared from a series of 12-ounce (350 mL) cups, each containing oat (Avena sativa) seedlings in a 1-inch (2.5 cm) layer of sterilized soil and a 1/2-inch layer of sand. The test units were sprayed as described in Test A with individual solutions of spraying, between 10 and 15 adult aster leafhoppers (Macrosteles fascifrons) were aspirated into each of the cups covered with vented lids. The cups were held at 27°C and 50% relative humidity for 48 hours, after which time mortality readings were taken. Of the compounds tested, the following gave mortality levels of 80% or higher: 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 33, 46, 51, 52, 53, 55.
TEST C
Boll Weevil
Five adult boll weevils (Anthonomus grandis grandis) were placed into each of a series of 9-ounce (260 mL) cups. The test units were sprayed as
described in Test A with individual solutions of the below-listed compounds. Each cup was then covered with a vented lid and held at 27°C and 50% relative humidity for 48 hours, after which time mortality readings were taken. Of the compounds tested, the following gave mortality levels of 80% or higher: 2, 6, 8, 12, 17, 19, 46.
TEST D
Black Bean Aphid
Individual nasturtium leaves were infested with 10 to 15 aphids (all stages of Aphis fabae) and sprayed with their undersides facing up as described in Test A. The leaves were then set in 3/8 inch diameter vials containing 4 ml of sugar water solution and
covered with a clear plastic 1-ounce portion cup to prevent escape of aphids that drop from the leaves. The test units were held at 27°C and 50% relative humidity for 48 hours, after which time mortality readings were taken. Of the compounds tested, the following gave mortality levels of 80% or higher: 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 19, 23, 25, 27, 28, 30.
TEST E
Two-Spotted Spider Mites
The test procedure for Test D was used for
efficacy against adult two-spotted spider mites
( Tetranychus urticae) , except that pre-infested one inch square kidney leaves were sprayed and then placed on 4 inch plastic lid with 4 inch wet cotton square was used. Test E is read at 48 hours for mortality. Of the compounds tested, the following gave mortality level of 80% or higher: 1, 2, 4, 11, 12, 14, 17, 18, 19, 23, 27, 29, 30, 31, 49, 50.
TEST F
Contact Activity Against Green Leafhopper Nymphs
Three rice ( Oryza sativa) seedlings, 1.5 leaf stage and about 10 cm tall were transplanted into a 1/2 ounce (14 mL) plastic cup containing Kumiai Brown artificial soil. Seven milliliters of distilled water was then added to the cup. The test chemical was prepared by first dissolving the chemical in acetone and then adding water to produce a final test
concentration of 75:25 (acetone :water). Four plastic cups, each cup serving as a replicate, were then placed on a spray chamber turntable. The cups were sprayed for 45 seconds with 50 mL of the chemical solution at a pressure of 2.0 kg/cm2 with air
atomizing spray nozzles. The turntable completes 7.5 rotations during the 45 second spray interval.
After chemical application, the treated cups were held in a vented enclosure to dry for about 2 h. After drying, the cups were placed into conical shaped test units and the surface of the soil covered with 2 to 3 mm of quartz sand. Eight to ten 3rd-instar nymphs of the green leafhopper (Nephotettix cincticeps) were transferred into the test units using an aspirator. The test units were held at 27°C and 65% relative humidity. Counts of the number of live and dead nymphs were taken at 24 and 48 h post-infestation.
Insects which cannot walk are classified as dead. Of the compounds tested, the following gave mortality levels of 80% or higher at 48 h at 100 ppm: 1, 2, 4, 7, 11, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 23, 24, 53, 55.
TEST G
Contact Activity Against Brown Planthopper Nymphs
Three rice ( Oryza sativa) seedlings, 1.5 leaf stage and about 10 cm tall were transplanted into a 1/2 oz. (14 mL) plastic cup containing Kumiai Brown artificial soil. Seven milliliters of distilled water was then added to the cup. The test chemical was prepared by first dissolving the chemical in acetone and then adding water to produce a final test
concentration of 75:25 (acetone:water). Four plastic cups, each cup serving as a replicate, were then placed on a spray chamber turntable. The cups were sprayed for 45 seconds with 50 mL of the chemical solution at a pressure of 2.0 kg/cm2 with air
atomizing spray nozzles. The turntable completes 7.5 rotations during the 45 second spray interval.
After chemical application, treated cups were held in a vented enclosure to dry for about 2 h. After drying, the cups were placed into conical shaped test units and the surface of the soil covered with 2 to 3 mm of quartz sand. Eight to ten 3rd-instar nymphs
of the brown planthopper (Nilaparvata lugens) were then transferred into the test units using an
aspirator. The test units were held at 27°C and
65% relative humidity. Counts of the number of live and dead nymphs are taken at 24 and 48 h
post-infestation. Insects which cannot walk are classified as dead. Of the compounds tested, the following gave mortality levels of 80% or higher at 48 h at 100 ppm: 1, 2, 4, 7, 11, 17, 18, 19, 20, 23, 24, 46, 53, 55.
TEST H
Solution Systemic Activity Against Green Leafhopper Nymphs
The test chemical was added directly into 10 mL of distilled water and dissolved completely. This chemical solution was poured into a conical shaped test unit. Three rice seedlings were then positioned in the unit by a notched sponge disk. The sponge disk allows complete immersion of the seedling root systems in the chemical solution, while the aerial portion of the plant is isolated above the solution. The sponge also prevents the test nymphs from accidentally contacting the test solution. A 7 to 10 mm space, between the surface of the chemical solution and the bottom of the sponge disk, prevents accidental
chemical contamination of the sponge. The rice seedlings were allowed to absorb the chemical from the solution for 24 h in a growth chamber held at 27°C and 65% relative humidity. Eight to ten 3rd-instar nymphs of the green leafhopper (Nephotettix cincticeps) were then transferred into the test units using an
aspirator. The infested units were held under the same temperature and humidity conditions described above. Counts of the number of live and dead nymphs were taken at 24 and 48 h post-infestation. Inspects
which cannot walk are classified as dead. Of the compounds tested, the following gave mortality levels of 80% or higher at 48 h at 100 ppm: 17,19,55.
TEST I
Solution Systemic Activity Against Brown Planthopper Nymphs
The test chemical was added directly into 10 mL of distilled water and dissolved completely. This chemical solution was poured into a conical shaped test unit. Three rice seedlings were then positioned in the unit by a notched sponge disk. The sponge disk allows complete immersion of the seedling root systems in the chemical solution, while the aerial portion of the plant is isolated above the solution. The sponge also prevents the test nymphs from accidentally contacting the test solution. A 7 to 10 mm space, between the surface of the chemical solution and the bottom of the sponge disk, prevents accidental
chemical contamination of the sponge. The rice seedlings were allowed to absorb the chemical from the solution for 24 h in a growth chamber held at 27°C and 65% relative humidity. Eight to ten 3rd-instar nymphs of the brown planthopper (Nilaparvata lugens) were then transferred into the test units using an
aspirator. The infested units were held under the same temperature and humidity conditions described above. Counts of the number of live and dead nymphs are taken at 24 and 48 h post-infestation. Inspects which cannot walk are classified as dead. Of the compounds tested, the following gave mortality levels of 80% or higher at 48 h at 100 ppm: 17, 18, 19, 55.