US20240360665A1 - Structural posts for improved buildings energy conservation - Google Patents
Structural posts for improved buildings energy conservation Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20240360665A1 US20240360665A1 US18/308,656 US202318308656A US2024360665A1 US 20240360665 A1 US20240360665 A1 US 20240360665A1 US 202318308656 A US202318308656 A US 202318308656A US 2024360665 A1 US2024360665 A1 US 2024360665A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- flange
- major
- web portion
- post
- minor
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E04—BUILDING
- E04B—GENERAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTIONS; WALLS, e.g. PARTITIONS; ROOFS; FLOORS; CEILINGS; INSULATION OR OTHER PROTECTION OF BUILDINGS
- E04B2/00—Walls, e.g. partitions, for buildings; Wall construction with regard to insulation; Connections specially adapted to walls
- E04B2/56—Load-bearing walls of framework or pillarwork; Walls incorporating load-bearing elongated members
- E04B2/70—Load-bearing walls of framework or pillarwork; Walls incorporating load-bearing elongated members with elongated members of wood
- E04B2/706—Load-bearing walls of framework or pillarwork; Walls incorporating load-bearing elongated members with elongated members of wood with supporting function
Definitions
- the invention relates generally to structural posts and more specifically to asymmetric I-posts to address energy conservation in housing.
- joists or beams When the lumber runs horizontally, they are referred to as joists or beams; when they are used vertically, they may be called posts or studs.
- a frame In construction, a frame is made from plural vertical posts arranged at regular intervals and these are usually termed “studs.” From an engineering perspective, an important difference is that horizontal joists are loaded in bending, putting the top portion into compression and the bottom portion into tension, whereas a vertical post is subject to purely compressive loads. A common failure mode for a post is buckling, which is not relevant to horizontal joists.
- I-beams are ideal structures used in horizontal joists because they optimize the material used for those compressive and tensile loads. Such I-beams are not used as vertical posts because there is no such need for optimizing the lumber into compressive and tensile portions. Therefore, posts are usually sold as solid dimensional lumber of regular dimensions, such as 2′′ ⁇ 4′′, 2′′ ⁇ 6′′, etc. Dimensions are provided herein in imperial inches, as is commonly used in the construction industry but the inventive principle also holds for metric markets.
- the structure of these posts is not optimized for green-build housing.
- the solid cross-section of these posts creates a great thermal bridge between the inside and outside of the house.
- the concept of a thermal bridge is that houses lose most of the heat at those points in the construction where materials with low thermal insulation connect the inside to the outside walls. Therefore, even if insulation is used inside the wall, the studs themselves will provide the thermal bridge to transfer heat.
- WO2017011121A1 describes a thermal break wood stud with rigid insulation and wall framing system. This solution requires giving an insulation break within the stud.
- WO2012114122A2 discloses a construction panel comprising a first frame member and a second frame member that are connected together around their perimeters by one or more connecting members.
- U.S. Pat. No. 4,852,322A on the other hand discloses a composite structural beam comprising two parallel wooden rails each having a groove and two rectangular pieces of wooden web slotted into the grooves of the rails.
- the invention provides a structural post having an I-shaped cross section.
- the structural post comprises a major flange; a minor flange, opposite the major flange, and having a cross-sectional area less than the major flange; and a web portion connected to the major and minor flanges.
- the difference in the cross-sectional areas of the major flange and the minor flange results in an asymmetrical structural post.
- the invention provides a wall frame comprising the structural post as described herein.
- Some of the key advantages of the structural post of the invention include: strength where it is needed; optimal use of materials for each function; thermally separation improves insulation; dimensionally stability (OSB/diagonals move less during changes in moisture content of framing); interchangeability with standard lumber; composite construction results in consistently straight studs that will not warp; and utilization of shorter and lower grade lumber compared to I-joists (as it is designed for vertical use, the loads are predominantly compression, which allows lumber that is often waste to be converted to usable structural members).
- FIG. 1 is a plan view of the structural post of the invention.
- FIG. 2 is a perspective view of 3 embodiments of the post: a) wide flange b) narrow flange, c) lattice webbing.
- FIG. 3 is a perspective view of a post with insulation siding.
- FIG. 4 is a perspective view of posts of different depths and includes an overlay of cross-sections still in plan view.
- FIG. 5 is a perspective view of a wall frame made from preferred embodiments of the post.
- the invention is a structural post that has been optimized for vertical loading with enough material to take the compressive load and structured to resist buckling.
- FIG. 1 is a plan view of the structural post of the invention, depicted by numeral 10 .
- each post is constructed of a major flange 12 , a minor flange 14 , and a web portion 16 between the flanges.
- These flanges 12 and 14 take the majority of the compressive load while being spaced apart to resist buckling.
- the major axis refers to directions in-line with the larger dimension of that web or flange and the minor axis refers to directions in-line with the smaller dimension.
- FIG. 1 shows a major flange having a major dimension of 3.5′′ and a minor dimension of 1.5′′. The major axes of both flanges and web portion are shown aligned.
- Web portion 16 connects the two flanges 12 and 14 with minimal area between them to reduce the thermal bridge. Therefore, the ideal web portion would have negligible area while maintaining the spaced-apart aspect of the two flanges.
- the web portion may be a weak structure and is not necessarily capable of being load bearing, but its purpose is to reduce thermal bridging as it is a low profile thermal break.
- it is made of oriented strand board.
- the web may run continuously the length of the post for improved strength.
- the web portion is a diagonal lattice board of lattice slats between the flanges. Thus one slat is in compression, and the next in tension.
- FIG. 2 shows variations in the construction of the structural posts.
- FIG. 2 a is a perspective view of a wide flange version according to prior art joists.
- FIG. 2 b is a perspective view of a narrow flange and
- FIG. 2 c is the same view of the structural post comprising lattice webbing 20 .
- FIG. 3 is a perspective view of the structural post that comprises an insulation siding 22 .
- the length of the web portion determines the R-value, acts as a spacer, and provides a flush surface across the depth of the post.
- the post is designed to be asymmetrical, with the major flange 12 being larger than the minor flange 14 . It is convenient to design the post's dimensions such that it has the same dimensions as the lumber that is already commercially available. For example, a standard 2 ⁇ 10 post would be replaced by the structural post of this invention of the same overall dimensions (i.e. nominally called 2 ⁇ 10 but actually 1.5 inches ⁇ 9.5 inches), notwithstanding that the web portion has substantially less material.
- the structural post of the invention can be used in replacement framing, keeping the standard spacing between existing studs (for example, every 16′′ or 24′′) and able to support window framing.
- the major flange has a minor dimension ranging from about 1.3 inches to about 1.7 inches, preferably about 1.5 inches.
- One of the key advantages offered by the structural post of the invention includes reduced weight while still maintaining the overall dimensions of an existing standard post. This is achieved through the use of a wooden webbing section whose width may be only 1 ⁇ 3 rd of the existing standard post. Thus the webbing thickness may be less than 0.6 inches ( ⁇ 1.3 cm).
- the reduced weight for the same dimension of the post of the invention in turn facilitates transportation, while reducing weight of the final construction.
- the major flange 12 has cross-sectional area sized for off-center compressive load, which renders the structural post 10 optimized for compressive loads.
- the present stud is designed with flanges with major axis aligned (in cross-section) that have a lower moment of inertia in the width direction BUT once the post is installed into a housing frame and screwed to a wall sheet (e.g. drywall, OSB or plywood) the system's moment of inertia increases so great that buckling is no longer of concern.
- each of the flanges there is a groove 18 that runs the length of each of the flanges, which groove is tapered and fixedly accepts the web portion 16 .
- the web portion could be physically wedged, glued, or nailed into this groove.
- the taper could be at any suitable angle.
- a standard angle of taper of 4.76° i.e. also called a “1 in 12 pitch” as used in the construction industry to make a tapered socket connection, and could be employed here advantageously to utilize existing manufacturing processes to manufacture the flanges and the web portion.
- the manufacture of the taper could involve machining and extruding each of the flanges on a linear conveyor with a web portion placed there between, whereby all parts come together and press into the final form of the post.
- FIG. 4 is a perspective view of the structural post of the invention having different depth (i.e. horizontal distance when the post is in a frame of FIG. 5 ), wherein the major flange 12 and minor flange 14 comprise grooves onto which the edge of the web portions 16 are configured to be suitably received.
- the web portion's width varies depending on the post size needed and received by unvaried major flange and minor flange.
- the web portion is formed in such a way that receivable sections are attached to the flanges in a facile manner. For example, they may be snap fit onto the flanges, or may be slid into the groove. Other such modes of attachments will become obvious to one skilled in the art, and is contemplated to be within the scope of the invention.
- the present post is an asymmetrical EWP (engineered wood product) stud designed for use in light wood framed construction.
- EWP engineered wood product
- the two main differentiating features from a typical 1-joist are the flange size being asymmetrical and the major axes being aligned with the web axis (in plan view).
- FIG. 5 is a perspective view of a wall frame made from the structural post of the certain embodiments.
- the structural post of the invention is intended to be used for the construction of light wood framed buildings.
- the asymmetrical nature of the stud optimizes lumber usage by connecting the primary load-bearing flange to a smaller flange by means of an OSB (oriented strand board) or diagonal wood slat web.
- OSB oriented strand board
- Typical construction methods place the primary load-bearing member towards the interior of the structure; however, this isn't required.
- the primary/larger flange can be oriented to the interior or exterior as needed.
- the structural post of the invention comprising the two flanges connected by the thin web section is optimal for construction of passive house structures and other low energy structures.
- the lightweight and dimensionally stable AI-Stud enables site builders and prefabrication facilities to quickly and accurately frame thick walls with minimal thermal bridging.
- All the components of the structural post of the invention may advantageously be made of wood.
- insulation boards fitted to the sides over the web portions to make the overall post rectangular in shape, which may help with installation.
- This may be, for example, flush facing known to be useful for windows mounting, also sometimes known as side board, which is typically a wood fibre board having little strength, low density, no binders, just heated and pressed wood.
- the side board though, provides thermal insulation, as it has the same R-value as cellulose.
- the structural post of the invention may further comprise thermal insulation in the form of fillers between the studs.
- An exemplary filler is cellulose, specifically those blown in fibres.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Architecture (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Electromagnetism (AREA)
- Civil Engineering (AREA)
- Structural Engineering (AREA)
- Rod-Shaped Construction Members (AREA)
Abstract
In one aspect, the invention provides a structural post that comprises a major flange and a minor flange connected through a web portion. The two flanges are configured such that a cross-sectional area of the major flange is greater than that of the minor flange. Thus, the structural post has an asymmetrical configuration due to the difference in the cross-sectional area between the two flanges. The middle portion has substantially less material thus rendering the structural post lighter in construction, which would facilitate transportation as well as make buildings lighter. Further, the minimal amount of material used in the web portion reduces thermal bridge, thus reducing heat loss from interior to exterior. The structural post of the invention can further be manufactured to predetermined dimensions to ensure that it can conveniently replace existing studs.
Description
- The invention relates generally to structural posts and more specifically to asymmetric I-posts to address energy conservation in housing.
- In building construction, one often uses standard dimensional lumber such as 2″×4″ which are used to frame houses. When the lumber runs horizontally, they are referred to as joists or beams; when they are used vertically, they may be called posts or studs. In construction, a frame is made from plural vertical posts arranged at regular intervals and these are usually termed “studs.” From an engineering perspective, an important difference is that horizontal joists are loaded in bending, putting the top portion into compression and the bottom portion into tension, whereas a vertical post is subject to purely compressive loads. A common failure mode for a post is buckling, which is not relevant to horizontal joists.
- I-beams are ideal structures used in horizontal joists because they optimize the material used for those compressive and tensile loads. Such I-beams are not used as vertical posts because there is no such need for optimizing the lumber into compressive and tensile portions. Therefore, posts are usually sold as solid dimensional lumber of regular dimensions, such as 2″×4″, 2″×6″, etc. Dimensions are provided herein in imperial inches, as is commonly used in the construction industry but the inventive principle also holds for metric markets.
- The structure of these posts is not optimized for green-build housing. In particular, the solid cross-section of these posts creates a great thermal bridge between the inside and outside of the house. The concept of a thermal bridge is that houses lose most of the heat at those points in the construction where materials with low thermal insulation connect the inside to the outside walls. Therefore, even if insulation is used inside the wall, the studs themselves will provide the thermal bridge to transfer heat.
- WO2017011121A1 describes a thermal break wood stud with rigid insulation and wall framing system. This solution requires giving an insulation break within the stud. WO2012114122A2 discloses a construction panel comprising a first frame member and a second frame member that are connected together around their perimeters by one or more connecting members. U.S. Pat. No. 4,852,322A on the other hand discloses a composite structural beam comprising two parallel wooden rails each having a groove and two rectangular pieces of wooden web slotted into the grooves of the rails. These solutions still pose the problem of increasing weight or making the final construction unwieldy for transportation.
- Energy costs and building/energy codes are forcing solutions to be found. Thus, there is a need to solve the problem of energy conservation without compromising on the structural integrity of buildings.
- In one aspect, the invention provides a structural post having an I-shaped cross section. The structural post comprises a major flange; a minor flange, opposite the major flange, and having a cross-sectional area less than the major flange; and a web portion connected to the major and minor flanges. The difference in the cross-sectional areas of the major flange and the minor flange results in an asymmetrical structural post.
- In another aspect, the invention provides a wall frame comprising the structural post as described herein. Some of the key advantages of the structural post of the invention include: strength where it is needed; optimal use of materials for each function; thermally separation improves insulation; dimensionally stability (OSB/diagonals move less during changes in moisture content of framing); interchangeability with standard lumber; composite construction results in consistently straight studs that will not warp; and utilization of shorter and lower grade lumber compared to I-joists (as it is designed for vertical use, the loads are predominantly compression, which allows lumber that is often waste to be converted to usable structural members).
- These and other features, aspects, and advantages of the present invention will become better understood when the following detailed description is read with reference to the accompanying drawings in which like characters represent like parts throughout the drawings, wherein:
-
FIG. 1 is a plan view of the structural post of the invention. -
FIG. 2 is a perspective view of 3 embodiments of the post: a) wide flange b) narrow flange, c) lattice webbing. -
FIG. 3 is a perspective view of a post with insulation siding. -
FIG. 4 is a perspective view of posts of different depths and includes an overlay of cross-sections still in plan view. -
FIG. 5 is a perspective view of a wall frame made from preferred embodiments of the post. - The definitions provided herein are to facilitate understanding of certain terms used frequently herein and are not meant to limit the scope of the present disclosure.
- As used in this specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a”, “an”, and “the” encompass embodiments having plural referents, unless the content clearly dictates otherwise.
- Unless otherwise indicated, all numbers expressing feature sizes, amounts, and physical properties used in the specification and claims are to be understood as being modified in all instances by the term “about.” Accordingly, unless indicated to the contrary, the numerical parameters set forth in the foregoing specification and attached claims are approximations that can vary depending upon the desired properties sought to be obtained by those skilled in the art utilizing the teachings disclosed herein. For example, the common 2×4 lumber refers to a nominal size of 2″ by 4″ even though such dimensions are typically now smaller than that (e.g., 1.5″×3.5″).
- As used in this specification and the appended claims, the term “or” is generally employed in its sense including “and/or” unless the content clearly dictates otherwise.
- In one aspect, the invention is a structural post that has been optimized for vertical loading with enough material to take the compressive load and structured to resist buckling.
FIG. 1 is a plan view of the structural post of the invention, depicted bynumeral 10. - In cross-section, each post is constructed of a
major flange 12, aminor flange 14, and aweb portion 16 between the flanges. Theseflanges FIG. 1 . The major axis refers to directions in-line with the larger dimension of that web or flange and the minor axis refers to directions in-line with the smaller dimension. For example,FIG. 1 shows a major flange having a major dimension of 3.5″ and a minor dimension of 1.5″. The major axes of both flanges and web portion are shown aligned. -
Web portion 16 connects the twoflanges - The orientation of the major and minor flange can vary depending on the final use case situation.
FIG. 2 shows variations in the construction of the structural posts.FIG. 2 a is a perspective view of a wide flange version according to prior art joists.FIG. 2 b is a perspective view of a narrow flange andFIG. 2 c is the same view of the structural post comprisinglattice webbing 20. -
FIG. 3 is a perspective view of the structural post that comprises aninsulation siding 22. In this manner, the amount of material used in the web portion is reduced, thus reducing the thermal bridge. The length of the web portion determines the R-value, acts as a spacer, and provides a flush surface across the depth of the post. - The post is designed to be asymmetrical, with the
major flange 12 being larger than theminor flange 14. It is convenient to design the post's dimensions such that it has the same dimensions as the lumber that is already commercially available. For example, a standard 2×10 post would be replaced by the structural post of this invention of the same overall dimensions (i.e. nominally called 2× 10 but actually 1.5 inches×9.5 inches), notwithstanding that the web portion has substantially less material. Thus, the structural post of the invention can be used in replacement framing, keeping the standard spacing between existing studs (for example, every 16″ or 24″) and able to support window framing. Thus preferably, the major flange has a minor dimension ranging from about 1.3 inches to about 1.7 inches, preferably about 1.5 inches. - One of the key advantages offered by the structural post of the invention includes reduced weight while still maintaining the overall dimensions of an existing standard post. This is achieved through the use of a wooden webbing section whose width may be only ⅓rd of the existing standard post. Thus the webbing thickness may be less than 0.6 inches (<1.3 cm). The reduced weight for the same dimension of the post of the invention in turn facilitates transportation, while reducing weight of the final construction.
- The
major flange 12 has cross-sectional area sized for off-center compressive load, which renders thestructural post 10 optimized for compressive loads. The asymmetrical configuration of the structural post with athin web 16 connecting two load bearing elements (major flange 12 and minor flange 14), such that the major axes of the two flanges are aligned and parallel with the major axis of the web portion. This configuration facilitates improved load bearing properties in vertical wall constructions, and utilizes timber more efficiently. - The Euler formula for column buckling is Pcr=π2·E·I/L2 where E is the lumber's modulus of elasticity in (force/length2), I is the moment of inertia (length4), and L is the length of the post. I is determined largely here by the flanges' orientation. The present stud is designed with flanges with major axis aligned (in cross-section) that have a lower moment of inertia in the width direction BUT once the post is installed into a housing frame and screwed to a wall sheet (e.g. drywall, OSB or plywood) the system's moment of inertia increases so great that buckling is no longer of concern.
- As seen in plan view in
FIG. 1 and inFIG. 4 , there is agroove 18 that runs the length of each of the flanges, which groove is tapered and fixedly accepts theweb portion 16. The web portion could be physically wedged, glued, or nailed into this groove. The taper could be at any suitable angle. For example, a standard angle of taper of 4.76° (i.e. also called a “1 in 12 pitch”) as used in the construction industry to make a tapered socket connection, and could be employed here advantageously to utilize existing manufacturing processes to manufacture the flanges and the web portion. In one exemplary embodiment, the manufacture of the taper could involve machining and extruding each of the flanges on a linear conveyor with a web portion placed there between, whereby all parts come together and press into the final form of the post. - In other embodiments, the web portion could be attached to the major flange and the minor flange through finger joints, interlocking glues, and the like.
FIG. 4 is a perspective view of the structural post of the invention having different depth (i.e. horizontal distance when the post is in a frame ofFIG. 5 ), wherein themajor flange 12 andminor flange 14 comprise grooves onto which the edge of theweb portions 16 are configured to be suitably received. InFIG. 4 , the web portion's width varies depending on the post size needed and received by unvaried major flange and minor flange. The web portion is formed in such a way that receivable sections are attached to the flanges in a facile manner. For example, they may be snap fit onto the flanges, or may be slid into the groove. Other such modes of attachments will become obvious to one skilled in the art, and is contemplated to be within the scope of the invention. - The present post is an asymmetrical EWP (engineered wood product) stud designed for use in light wood framed construction. The two main differentiating features from a typical 1-joist are the flange size being asymmetrical and the major axes being aligned with the web axis (in plan view).
- The invention overcomes the current problem with the commercially available wooden I-joists that have been optimized for use in horizontal (floor/roof) applications but have no manufacturing support as framing for vertical (wall) use. The structural post of the present asymmetric post is particularly developed for use in structural wall construction to replace standard dimensional lumber, as well as exceeding specifications when extra thick walls are required.
FIG. 5 is a perspective view of a wall frame made from the structural post of the certain embodiments. - The structural post of the invention is intended to be used for the construction of light wood framed buildings. The asymmetrical nature of the stud optimizes lumber usage by connecting the primary load-bearing flange to a smaller flange by means of an OSB (oriented strand board) or diagonal wood slat web.
- Typical construction methods place the primary load-bearing member towards the interior of the structure; however, this isn't required. The primary/larger flange can be oriented to the interior or exterior as needed. The structural post of the invention comprising the two flanges connected by the thin web section is optimal for construction of passive house structures and other low energy structures. The lightweight and dimensionally stable AI-Stud enables site builders and prefabrication facilities to quickly and accurately frame thick walls with minimal thermal bridging.
- All the components of the structural post of the invention, including the major flange, the minor flange and the web portion, may advantageously be made of wood. However, it would also be obvious to one skilled in the art that there may be insulation boards fitted to the sides over the web portions to make the overall post rectangular in shape, which may help with installation. This may be, for example, flush facing known to be useful for windows mounting, also sometimes known as side board, which is typically a wood fibre board having little strength, low density, no binders, just heated and pressed wood. The side board though, provides thermal insulation, as it has the same R-value as cellulose.
- The structural post of the invention may further comprise thermal insulation in the form of fillers between the studs. An exemplary filler is cellulose, specifically those blown in fibres.
- While only certain features of the invention have been illustrated and described herein, many modifications and changes will occur to those skilled in the art. It is, therefore, to be understood that the appended claims are intended to cover all such modifications and changes as fall within the true spirit of the invention.
Claims (15)
1. A structural post comprising:
a major flange;
a minor flange, opposite the major flange, and having a cross-sectional area less than a cross-sectional area of the major flange; and
a web portion connected to the major and minor flanges,
wherein, in cross-section, major axes of the major flange, minor flange, and web portion are aligned.
2. The structural post of claim 1 , wherein the major flange and the minor flange comprise a groove to receive ends of the web portion.
3. The structural post of claim 1 wherein the major flange has a width ranging from 1.3 inches to about 1.8 inches.
4. The structural post of claim 3 wherein the structural post of claim 1 wherein the major flange has a width of about 1.5 inches.
5. The structural post of claim 1 wherein the web portion is OSB (oriented strand board).
6. The structural post of claim 1 wherein the web portion comprises crossed, diagonal wooden slats.
7. The structural post of claim 1 wherein the web portion runs continuously along a length of the flanges.
8. The structural post of claim 1 wherein the web portion is connected to the major flange and minor flange through at least one of a nail or glue.
9. The structural post of claim 1 wherein the major flange, the minor flange and the web portion are all made of wood-based materials.
10. The structural post of claim 1 , having an I-shaped cross-section.
11. The structural post of claim 1 further comprising a thermally insulating side cladding to create a flush side of the post between flanges.
12. The structural post of claim 1 wherein the major flange and minor flange are made of one of spruce, pine, or fir wood.
13. The structural post of claim 1 wherein the web portion is connected to the minor and major flanges by tapered socket connections.
14. A wall frame comprising plural structural posts of claim 1 .
15. A wall frame comprising two or more interconnected structural posts, wherein each structural post has an I-shaped cross-section comprising:
a major flange;
a minor flange, opposite the major flange, and having a cross-sectional area less than the major flange; and
a web portion connected to the major and minor flanges,
wherein, in cross-section, major axes of the major flange, minor flange, and web portion are aligned.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US18/308,656 US20240360665A1 (en) | 2023-04-27 | 2023-04-27 | Structural posts for improved buildings energy conservation |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US18/308,656 US20240360665A1 (en) | 2023-04-27 | 2023-04-27 | Structural posts for improved buildings energy conservation |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20240360665A1 true US20240360665A1 (en) | 2024-10-31 |
Family
ID=93216565
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US18/308,656 Abandoned US20240360665A1 (en) | 2023-04-27 | 2023-04-27 | Structural posts for improved buildings energy conservation |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20240360665A1 (en) |
Citations (23)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2455217A (en) * | 1943-08-20 | 1948-11-30 | Borges Alberto | Joints of hollow beams |
US4329827A (en) * | 1980-05-06 | 1982-05-18 | Masonite Ab | Roofing elements |
US4336678A (en) * | 1978-07-24 | 1982-06-29 | Peters Dierk D | I-Beam truss structure |
US4413459A (en) * | 1981-03-16 | 1983-11-08 | Boise Cascade Corporation | Laminated wooden structural assembly |
US4456497A (en) * | 1982-09-29 | 1984-06-26 | Eberle George F | Wood I-beam and method of fabricating the same |
US4715162A (en) * | 1986-01-06 | 1987-12-29 | Trus Joist Corporation | Wooden joist with web members having cut tapered edges and vent slots |
US4967534A (en) * | 1985-08-09 | 1990-11-06 | Mitek Holding, Inc. | Wood I-beams and methods of making same |
US5323584A (en) * | 1989-09-11 | 1994-06-28 | Jager Industries Inc. | Structural beam and joint therefor |
US5556565A (en) * | 1995-06-07 | 1996-09-17 | The Boeing Company | Method for composite welding using a hybrid metal webbed composite beam |
US5974760A (en) * | 1993-03-24 | 1999-11-02 | Tingley; Daniel A. | Wood I-beam with synthetic fiber reinforcement |
US6012262A (en) * | 1996-03-14 | 2000-01-11 | Trus Joist Macmillan | Built-up I-beam with laminated flange |
US6158189A (en) * | 1999-04-01 | 2000-12-12 | Alpa Roof Trusses Inc. | Wooden I-beam and wooden structural beam and bridging assembly |
US6173550B1 (en) * | 1993-03-24 | 2001-01-16 | Daniel A. Tingley | Wood I-beam conditioned reinforcement panel |
US6460310B1 (en) * | 2000-09-26 | 2002-10-08 | Graftech Inc. | Composite I-beam having improved properties |
US20090205277A1 (en) * | 2008-02-19 | 2009-08-20 | Gibson A David | Construction Panel System And Method Of Manufacture Thereof |
US20100300037A1 (en) * | 2006-08-12 | 2010-12-02 | Michael James Paul Turner | Insulating Structure |
US10253499B2 (en) * | 2015-08-28 | 2019-04-09 | Australian Engineered Solutions Pty Ltd | Structural building element |
US10731332B1 (en) * | 2019-08-28 | 2020-08-04 | Roosevelt Energy, Llc | Composite reinforced wood stud for residential and commercial buildings |
USD936242S1 (en) * | 2019-08-28 | 2021-11-16 | Roosevelt Energy, Inc. | Composite reinforced wood stud for buildings |
USD941498S1 (en) * | 2019-11-26 | 2022-01-18 | Roosevelt Energy, Inc. | Composite t-shaped in-line dowell reinforced wood stud for buildings |
USD942049S1 (en) * | 2019-11-14 | 2022-01-25 | Roosevelt Energy, Inc. | L-shaped composite reinforced wood stud for buildings |
US11680405B2 (en) * | 2014-08-11 | 2023-06-20 | Patenttitoimisto T. Poutanen Oy | Glued timber truss |
USD1033679S1 (en) * | 2021-01-29 | 2024-07-02 | Roosevelt Energy, Inc. | Stud for buildings |
-
2023
- 2023-04-27 US US18/308,656 patent/US20240360665A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (23)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2455217A (en) * | 1943-08-20 | 1948-11-30 | Borges Alberto | Joints of hollow beams |
US4336678A (en) * | 1978-07-24 | 1982-06-29 | Peters Dierk D | I-Beam truss structure |
US4329827A (en) * | 1980-05-06 | 1982-05-18 | Masonite Ab | Roofing elements |
US4413459A (en) * | 1981-03-16 | 1983-11-08 | Boise Cascade Corporation | Laminated wooden structural assembly |
US4456497A (en) * | 1982-09-29 | 1984-06-26 | Eberle George F | Wood I-beam and method of fabricating the same |
US4967534A (en) * | 1985-08-09 | 1990-11-06 | Mitek Holding, Inc. | Wood I-beams and methods of making same |
US4715162A (en) * | 1986-01-06 | 1987-12-29 | Trus Joist Corporation | Wooden joist with web members having cut tapered edges and vent slots |
US5323584A (en) * | 1989-09-11 | 1994-06-28 | Jager Industries Inc. | Structural beam and joint therefor |
US6173550B1 (en) * | 1993-03-24 | 2001-01-16 | Daniel A. Tingley | Wood I-beam conditioned reinforcement panel |
US5974760A (en) * | 1993-03-24 | 1999-11-02 | Tingley; Daniel A. | Wood I-beam with synthetic fiber reinforcement |
US5556565A (en) * | 1995-06-07 | 1996-09-17 | The Boeing Company | Method for composite welding using a hybrid metal webbed composite beam |
US6012262A (en) * | 1996-03-14 | 2000-01-11 | Trus Joist Macmillan | Built-up I-beam with laminated flange |
US6158189A (en) * | 1999-04-01 | 2000-12-12 | Alpa Roof Trusses Inc. | Wooden I-beam and wooden structural beam and bridging assembly |
US6460310B1 (en) * | 2000-09-26 | 2002-10-08 | Graftech Inc. | Composite I-beam having improved properties |
US20100300037A1 (en) * | 2006-08-12 | 2010-12-02 | Michael James Paul Turner | Insulating Structure |
US20090205277A1 (en) * | 2008-02-19 | 2009-08-20 | Gibson A David | Construction Panel System And Method Of Manufacture Thereof |
US11680405B2 (en) * | 2014-08-11 | 2023-06-20 | Patenttitoimisto T. Poutanen Oy | Glued timber truss |
US10253499B2 (en) * | 2015-08-28 | 2019-04-09 | Australian Engineered Solutions Pty Ltd | Structural building element |
US10731332B1 (en) * | 2019-08-28 | 2020-08-04 | Roosevelt Energy, Llc | Composite reinforced wood stud for residential and commercial buildings |
USD936242S1 (en) * | 2019-08-28 | 2021-11-16 | Roosevelt Energy, Inc. | Composite reinforced wood stud for buildings |
USD942049S1 (en) * | 2019-11-14 | 2022-01-25 | Roosevelt Energy, Inc. | L-shaped composite reinforced wood stud for buildings |
USD941498S1 (en) * | 2019-11-26 | 2022-01-18 | Roosevelt Energy, Inc. | Composite t-shaped in-line dowell reinforced wood stud for buildings |
USD1033679S1 (en) * | 2021-01-29 | 2024-07-02 | Roosevelt Energy, Inc. | Stud for buildings |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CA2692723C (en) | Structural insulated roof panels with a rigid foam core | |
CA2692597C (en) | Structural insulated panels with a rigid foam core and without thermal bridging | |
US20170321418A1 (en) | Fire-resistant construction panel | |
JP2009507153A (en) | Construction system for building walls | |
US20240360665A1 (en) | Structural posts for improved buildings energy conservation | |
US5189860A (en) | Construction systems and elements thereof | |
US20040226255A1 (en) | Composite beam | |
CN111094673A (en) | Building and construction method thereof | |
US5022210A (en) | Construction systems and elements thereof | |
CZ29272U1 (en) | Structural beam with wooden flange plates and reinforced composite web | |
EP1811097B1 (en) | Building element | |
EP2935716B1 (en) | Composite structural member with thermal and/or sound insulation characteristics for building construction und building using it | |
EP4074912A1 (en) | Floor beam for buildings and bridges | |
RU2841006C1 (en) | H-beam | |
US20220364363A1 (en) | Insulated Box Beam Framing Member | |
KR102575684B1 (en) | Integral wooden prefab shear wall and its manufacturing method | |
RU212431U1 (en) | wooden beam | |
EP1953300B1 (en) | Arrangement for joining wood-based construction elements | |
US20230235547A1 (en) | Rail structure and balcony comprising the rail structure | |
JP2025021992A (en) | Floor structure of steel frame building | |
JP2025069867A (en) | Horizontal structure and method for constructing horizontal structure | |
PL227066B1 (en) | Wooden ceiling element | |
CN118110299A (en) | Bamboo-wood steel-plastic combined floor board and production method thereof | |
JP2024072423A (en) | Building materials | |
SK2312002A3 (en) | Versatile truss with a hollow |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED |