US20070186028A2 - Synchronized storage providing multiple synchronization semantics - Google Patents
Synchronized storage providing multiple synchronization semantics Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20070186028A2 US20070186028A2 US10/954,988 US95498804A US2007186028A2 US 20070186028 A2 US20070186028 A2 US 20070186028A2 US 95498804 A US95498804 A US 95498804A US 2007186028 A2 US2007186028 A2 US 2007186028A2
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- instruction
- data storage
- load
- view
- storage location
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 95
- 230000001360 synchronised effect Effects 0.000 title description 10
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 265
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 49
- 238000013500 data storage Methods 0.000 claims description 136
- 238000004590 computer program Methods 0.000 claims description 23
- 230000000644 propagated effect Effects 0.000 claims description 23
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 claims description 13
- 230000005055 memory storage Effects 0.000 claims 2
- 210000004027 cell Anatomy 0.000 description 38
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 10
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 7
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 7
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 7
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 7
- 239000000872 buffer Substances 0.000 description 6
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000000903 blocking effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000007726 management method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000004065 semiconductor Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000000725 suspension Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000000927 vapour-phase epitaxy Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000006399 behavior Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000003491 array Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000429 assembly Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000712 assembly Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003190 augmentative effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004422 calculation algorithm Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000295 complement effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012790 confirmation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008094 contradictory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001934 delay Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002708 enhancing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007717 exclusion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000796 flavoring agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000019634 flavors Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000000977 initiatory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000010354 integration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001404 mediated effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008450 motivation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005457 optimization Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000036316 preload Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009877 rendering Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012552 review Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009738 saturating Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004088 simulation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009987 spinning Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000000352 storage cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000006467 substitution reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008685 targeting Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002123 temporal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013519 translation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001960 triggered effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F9/00—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units
- G06F9/06—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units using stored programs, i.e. using an internal store of processing equipment to receive or retain programs
- G06F9/30—Arrangements for executing machine instructions, e.g. instruction decode
- G06F9/30181—Instruction operation extension or modification
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F9/00—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units
- G06F9/06—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units using stored programs, i.e. using an internal store of processing equipment to receive or retain programs
- G06F9/30—Arrangements for executing machine instructions, e.g. instruction decode
- G06F9/30003—Arrangements for executing specific machine instructions
- G06F9/3004—Arrangements for executing specific machine instructions to perform operations on memory
- G06F9/30043—LOAD or STORE instructions; Clear instruction
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F9/00—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units
- G06F9/06—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units using stored programs, i.e. using an internal store of processing equipment to receive or retain programs
- G06F9/30—Arrangements for executing machine instructions, e.g. instruction decode
- G06F9/38—Concurrent instruction execution, e.g. pipeline or look ahead
- G06F9/3824—Operand accessing
- G06F9/3834—Maintaining memory consistency
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F9/00—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units
- G06F9/06—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units using stored programs, i.e. using an internal store of processing equipment to receive or retain programs
- G06F9/46—Multiprogramming arrangements
- G06F9/52—Program synchronisation; Mutual exclusion, e.g. by means of semaphores
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F8/00—Arrangements for software engineering
- G06F8/40—Transformation of program code
- G06F8/41—Compilation
- G06F8/44—Encoding
- G06F8/443—Optimisation
- G06F8/4441—Reducing the execution time required by the program code
- G06F8/4442—Reducing the number of cache misses; Data prefetching
Definitions
- the invention relates generally to multiprocessing systems and more specifically to multiple thread synchronization activities on one or more processing elements (real, virtual, or otherwise).
- Multiprocessing systems continue to become increasingly important in computing systems for many applications, including general purpose processing systems and embedded control systems.
- an important architectural consideration is scalability.
- the machine should produce higher performance.
- embedded implementations require increased processing power, many also require the seemingly contradictory attribute of providing low power consumption.
- solutions are implemented as “Systems on Chip” or “SoC.”
- SoC Systems on Chip
- the present invention addresses improvements to synchronization among threads in a multithreaded multiprocessing environment, particularly when individual threads may be active on one or more multiple processors, on a single processor but distributed among multiple thread contexts, or resident in memory (virtualized threads).
- Synchronization in a multithreaded system refers to the activities and functions of such a multiplicity of threads that coordinate use of shared system resources (e.g., system memory and interface FIFOs) through variables storing “state” bits for producer/consumer communication and mutual exclusion (MUTEX) tasks.
- shared system resources e.g., system memory and interface FIFOs
- MUTEX producer/consumer communication and mutual exclusion
- Important considerations for implementing any particular synchronization paradigm include designing and implementing structures and processes that provide for deadlock-free operation while being very efficient in terms of time, system resources, and other performance measurements.
- MIPS processor architecture Details regarding the MIPS processor architecture are provided in the following document, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety for all purposes: D. Sweetman, See MIPS Run, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc. (1999).
- a CISC paradigm is easier, in some ways, to adapt hardware resources to particular problems because the instruction set may be extended virtually without limit as instructions and operands in an instruction pipeline may be of variable length.
- a designer that wants to implement a special hardware synchronization instruction set is able to add new synchronization instructions easily as many CISC instruction sets already contemplate extensions to basic instruction sets.
- that solution is generally not available to designers working with RISC instruction sets.
- Most instructions sets are filled or nearly filled with vacancies judiciously filled after many factors are extensively considered and evaluated. What is needed is a system for extending or enhancing existing instruction sets, with such a solution particularly useful in the RISC environment, but not exclusively useful as the CISC environment may also benefit from instruction set extension.
- the present invention has been made in consideration of the above situation, and has as an object to provide a system, method, computer program product, and propagated signal which efficiently, in a specific embodiment, enables inter-thread synchronization among a plurality of threads that may be active on one or more of: multiple processors, on a single processor but distributed among multiple thread contexts, and/or resident in memory (virtualized threads) without deadlock.
- a system, method, computer program, and propagated signal which efficiently enables extension of instructions and classes of instructions.
- a preferred embodiment of the present invention includes a shared resource access control system having a gating storage responsive to a plurality of control bits with the control bits derived from an access reference identifying the shared resource, the gating storage including a plurality of sets of views with each set of views including a first view and a second view with the gating storage producing a particular view from a particular one set responsive to the control bits; and a controller, coupled to the gating storage, for controlling access to the shared resource using the particular one view.
- Another preferred embodiment of the present invention includes a shared resource access control method, the method applying an access instruction for the data storage location to a memory system, the memory system including a plurality of data storage locations, each the data storage location associated with a set of views including a first view and a second view with the memory system producing a particular one view from a particular one set of views associated with the data storage location responsive to a set of control bits derived from an address identifying the data storage location; producing the particular one view from the particular one set of views; and controlling access to the data storage location using the particular one view.
- Preferred embodiments of the present also include both a computer program product having a computer readable medium carrying program instructions for accessing a memory when executed using a computing system, the executed program instructions executing a method, as well as a propagated signal on which is carried computer-executable instructions which when executed by a computing system performs a method, the method including applying an access instruction for the data storage location to a memory system, the memory system including a plurality of data storage locations, each the data storage location associated with a set of views including a first view and a second view with the memory system producing a particular one view from a particular one set of views associated with the data storage location responsive to a set of control bits derived from an address identifying the data storage location; producing the particular one view from the particular one set of views; and controlling access to the data storage location using the particular one view.
- An alternate preferred embodiment includes an apparatus for extending a load/store instruction having a target address, the apparatus including a memory system having a view associated with a data storage location identified by a tag derived from the target address, the data storage location associated with the load/store instruction, the memory system responsive to the target address to produce a particular view for the load/store instruction from the memory system; and a controller, coupled to the data storage location and to the memory system, for implementing a an load/store method for the load/store instruction using the particular view.
- Other preferred embodiments include a method, and both a computer program product and a propagated signal carrying computer-executable instructions for extending an instruction using an instruction rule when executed by a computing system, the computer-executable instructions implementing a method.
- This method including producing, responsive to the target address, a particular view for the load/store instruction from a memory system, the memory system having a view associated with a data storage location identified by a tag derived from the target address, the data storage location associated with the load/store instruction; and implementing a load/store method for the load/store instruction using the particular view.
- FIG. 1 is a schematic block diagram of a preferred embodiment for a gating storage system
- FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram illustrating a preferred implementation for an example of a bit assignment of the data elements shown in FIG. 4 .
- the present invention relates to multiple thread synchronization activities on one or more processing elements.
- the following description is presented to enable one of ordinary skill in the art to make and use the invention and is provided in the context of a patent application and its requirements.
- Various modifications to the preferred embodiment and the generic principles and features described herein will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art.
- the present invention is not intended to be limited to the embodiment shown but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and features described herein.
- Data-driven programming models map well to multithreaded architectures. For example, threads of execution are able to read data from memory-mapped I/O FIFOs, and may be suspended for as long as it takes for a FIFO to fill, while other threads continue to execute. When the data is available, the load completes, and the incoming data may be processed directly in the load destination register without requiring any I/O interrupt service, polling, or software task scheduling.
- the preferred embodiment of the present invention therefore introduces a specific implementation of a concept of “Gating Storage”—memory (or memory-like devices) that are tagged in the TLB (with extended bits or direct physical decode) as potentially requiring abort and restart of loads or stores.
- the abort/restart capability may require explicit support from the processor/memory interface protocols. It should be noted that in some implementations the memory is not tagged in a memory management unit; rather the memory may be direct mapped or otherwise identified.
- the gating storage is a special case of a more generalized concept. As described herein, the gating storage may be conceptualized as a physical address subspace with special properties. In the specific examples described above and as set forth in more detail below, this gating storage serves as an Inter-Thread Communication (ITC) storage for enabling thread-to-thread and thread-to-I/O synchronization, particularly for load/store instructions.
- ITC Inter-Thread Communication
- Each 64-bit location or “cell” within this gating storage space appears at multiple consecutive addresses, or “views”, distinguished by “view” bits (e.g., bits [ 6 : 3 ] though other implementations may use more, fewer, or different bits) of the load/store target address. Each view may have distinct semantics for the same instruction.
- a fundamental property of the gating storage is that loads and stores may be precisely view-referenced by the load or store. Any blocked loads and stores resume execution when the actions of other threads of execution, or possibly those of external devices, result in the completion requirements being satisfied. As gating storage references, blocked ITC loads and stores can be precisely aborted and restarted by systems software.
- cells within gating storage space may be “Empty” or “Full”.
- a load from a cell that is Empty causes the thread issuing the load to be suspended until the cell is written to by a store from another thread.
- a store to a cell, when Full, causes the thread issuing the store to be suspended until a previous value has been consumed by a load.
- Such gating storage may define independent Empty and Full conditions, rather than a single Empty/Full bit, in order to allow for FIFO buffered gating storage.
- Empty would simply be the negation of Full.
- a FIFO cannot be both Empty and Full, but it is able to be neither Empty nor Full when it contains some data, but could accept more.
- one view in an implementation is a standard empty/full synchronization construct for producers and consumers.
- Another view may implement classical “P/V” semaphores by blocking loads even of “full” cells when the value of the cell is zero.
- Other views might implement atomic semaphore “get” and “put”, or fetch-and-increment or fetch-and-decrement operations without blocking, among other types, variations, and implementations of synchronization constructs.
- a load/store target address may designate gating storage through a direct decode or use of special TLB entries.
- References to virtual memory pages whose TLB entries are tagged as gating storage resolve not to standard memory, but to a store with special attributes.
- Each page maps a set of 1-64 64-bit storage locations, called “cells”, each of which may be accessed in one of a multiplicity of ways, called “views” using standard load and store instructions.
- the view is encoded in the low order (and untranslated) view bits of a generated virtual address for the load/store target address.
- a fundamental property of the gating storage is that it synchronizes executions streams.
- a blocked load or store may be precisely aborted when necessary, and restarted by the controlling operating system when appropriate.
- Each cell of the gating storage has Empty and Full Boolean states associated with it.
- the cell views are then defined as follows. TABLE I CELL VIEW DEFINITIONS Address Bits [6:3] View BIT Value Gating Storage Behavior 2#0000 Bypass: Loads/Stores do not block, and do not affect Empty/Full 2#0001 Control: Read or Write of Status/Control Information.
- Loads return the current cell data value when the value is non-zero, and cause an atomic post-decrement of the value.
- Stores cause an atomic increment of the cell value, up to a maximal value at which they saturate.
- the width of the incremented/decremented field within the ITC cell need not be the full 32 or 64-bit width of the cell. It preferably, however, implements at least 15 bits of unsigned value 2#0101 P/V Storage “Try” view. Loads and stores do not modify the Empty and Full bits, both of which should be cleared as part of cell initialization for P/V semaphore use.
- Loads return the current cell data value, even when zero. When the load value is non-zero, an atomic post-decrement is performed of the value. Stores cause a saturating atomic increment of the cell value, as described for the P/V Synchronized view, and cannot fail 2#0110 Architecturally Reserved View 0 2#0111 Architecturally Reserved View 1 2#1000 Application or Implementation Specific View 0 . . . Application or Implementation Specific View X 2#1111 Application or Implementation Specific View 7
- Each storage cell could thus be described by the C structure: struct ⁇ uint64 bypass_cell uint64 ctl_cell uint64 ef_sync_cell; uint64 ef_try_cell; uint64 pv_synch_cell; uint64 pv_try_cell; uint64 res_arch[2] uint64 imp_dep[8] ⁇ ITC_cell;
- references to this storage may have access types of less than sixty-four bits (e.g. SW/LW, SH/LH SB/LB), with the same Empty/Full protocol being enforced on a per-access basis.
- Store/Load pairs of the same data type to a given ITC address will always reference the same data, but the byte and halfword ordering within words, and the word ordering within 64-bit doublewords, may be implementation and endianness-dependent, i.e. a SW followed by a LB from the same ITC address is not guaranteed to be portable.
- compiler optimizations may generate sequences that break ITC protocols, and great care must be taken if ITC is directly referenced as “memory” in a high-level language.
- the gating storage may be saved and restored by copying the ⁇ bypass_cell, ctl_cell ⁇ pair to and from general storage. While the full data width, 64 or 32 bits, of bypass_cell must be preserved, strictly speaking, only the least significant bits of the ef_state need to be manipulated.
- each cell In the case of multi-entry data buffers (e.g. FIFOs), each cell must be read using an Empty/Full view until the Control view shows the cell to be Empty to drain the buffer on a copy. The FIFO state can then be restored by performing a series of Empty/Full stores to an equivalent FIFO cell starting in an Empty state. Implementations may provide depth counters in the implementation-specific bits of the Control view to optimize this process. Software must ensure that no other accesses are made to ITC cells during the save and restore processes.
- the “physical address space” of gating storage may be made global across all VPEs and processors in a multiprocessor system as shown and described above, such that a thread is able to synchronize on a cell on a different VPE from the one on which it is executing.
- Global gating storage addresses could be derived from a CPUNum field of an EBase register of each VPE.
- CPUNum includes ten bits that correspond to the ten significant bits of storage address into the gating storage.
- Processors or cores designed for uniprocessor applications need not export a physical interface to the gating storage, and may treat the gating storage as a processor-internal resource.
- FIG. 1 is a schematic block diagram of a preferred embodiment for a gating storage system 100 including a view directory 105 .
- View directory 105 contains the view as discussed above for load/store instructions implementing synchronization methods through use of system 100 .
- a data memory 110 includes an associated data block for any gating storage data.
- An address decoder 115 generates the tag, from an instruction or an instruction operand, as an address offset of a block within a page.
- An instruction that potentially references the gating storage space causes view directory 105 to be cycled at the tag generated from the operand of the instruction. Any gating storage operation is aborted when decoder 115 resolves the virtual address translation to non-gating system 100 .
- the operand is a target address within gating storage system 100
- the operand-identified function is one of the views (e.g., EF Synchronization View)
- the instruction operation is not blocked, i.e. a load from a non-Empty cell or a store to a non-Full cell, a data transfer is performed relative to data memory 110 on a subsequent cycle. Otherwise, the instruction is recorded in a thread operation buffer 120 and the thread is suspended. Changes in gating storage system 100 that may affect suspended threads are retried.
- each change of an empty/full state of a location in data memory 110 causes the affected address to be broadcast to thread operation buffers 120 , where it is compared against the addresses of blocked operations. Those operations that become unblocked are retried against the new tag state, and when they succeed, the content of the particular thread operation buffer 120 is de-allocated and the associated thread unblocked by completion of the GS instruction operation.
- a control logic function 125 arbitrates between retries and new requests.
- This style of implementation allows a gating storage system “hit” where data memory 110 is already in the state desired, to have the same timing as a cache hit, but it presupposes tight integration with an instruction generation source, for example with a processor core.
- Less closely coupled implementations of gating storage system 100 where the gating storage block is instantiated more like a scratchpad RAM or an I/O device supporting a gating storage protocol, would be less core-intrusive, but may also stall the pipeline even on a “hit”.
- FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram illustrating a preferred implementation for a bit assignment of the data elements shown in FIG. 1 .
- the instruction operand when the applicable instruction is a load/store instruction targeting a memory location within data memory 110 , the instruction operand includes a target address 200 .
- address 200 is sixty-four bits long, with a subset of bits of low order, e.g., untranslated bits [ 6 : 3 ] of the target address and a subset of bits of high order used as the tag or index. Other implementations may vary some, all, or none of these values.
- an operand (i.e., a target address) of a load/store instruction into gating storage 100 is sometimes referred to herein as an access reference. Controls derived from this access reference include the tag, and the view, though in other implementations, the access reference and the controls may have different constructions and/or configurations from these preferred implementations.
- View directory 105 is a special memory for views, also referred to herein as access method functions.
- An entry of directory 105 includes a view memory entry 210 .
- An entry of memory 110 also referred to herein as a data storage location, holds data at an address derived from target address 200 and may include entry controls/flags/tags 220 .
- each entry 205 includes data 215 and one or more entry controls (e.g., bits or flags) 220 .
- Entry controls may include constructs such as a write-protect bit, a validity bit, control flag bit(s) discussed above that may modify operation of control logic 125 (e.g., a number of times to spin prior to an abort/exception), and/or other tags bits.
- Each entry 210 includes a multiplicity of eight-byte views, any particular one of which is selectable by the value of the view bits [ 6 : 3 ] of the instruction operand. Further discussion of these views appears below, however for now it is sufficient to understand that each of the views is used to alter/enhance/modify the affect of the operand and/or the affect of an instruction upon its operand, or the method by which a processor operates upon the instruction and the instruction operand.
- the instruction is a load/store instruction
- the instruction operand is a memory location decoded into gating storage 100 such that sixteen views are available to redefine some aspect of the operation of the load/store instruction relative to this memory location.
- the views define possible synchronization constructs, functions, or methods that may be used accessing the particular memory location, such as using an Empty/Full primitive or a P/V semaphore.
- An inter-thread communication control unit ITU
- the constructs, functions, or methods maybe other than synchronization-related for load/store instructions.
- other instructions may be processed through a memory system having access method functions applied dependent upon an associated operand.
- Gating storage is an attribute of memory which may optionally be supported by processors implementing embodiments of the present invention.
- the user-mode load/store semantics of gating storage are identical with those of normal memory, except that completion of the operation may be blocked for unbounded periods of time.
- the distinguishing feature of gating storage is that outstanding load or store operations can be aborted and restarted.
- it is a TLB-mediated property of a virtual page whether or not a location is treated as gating storage (though other mechanisms may be implemented to identify gating storage locations).
- a program counter as seen by the exception program counter register and the branch delay state as seen by a Cause.BD bit are set so as that an execution of an exception return (ERET) by the instruction stream associated by the thread context, or a clearing of the thread context halted state, causes a re-issue of the gating load/store.
- ERET exception return
- gating storage provides a simple and efficient mechanism to extend an instruction set (particularly advantageous to processors implementing RISC instruction sets).
- This aspect of the present invention uses an operand of an instruction to modify, enhance, substitute, or otherwise affect an instruction using hardware features.
- the gating storage adds multiple load/store commands to the basic instruction set, each of the added commands a variant of the basic command but including a hardware-managed instruction that implements a wide variety of synchronization constructs in the process of completing a load or a store.
- Normal loads/stores are still available by not including an operand within the gating storage.
- special memory having special instruction functions/methods triggered from the operand may be implemented to extend many types of instructions in many different ways.
- the inherently restricted number and complexity of instruction operand encodings in a “RISC” instruction set is augmented by adding computational semantics to basic instructions (e.g., RISC storage access instructions such as loads and stores), by using an instruction context (e.g., a portion of the storage address of the load or store as an opcode extension) to express a calculation or control function to be executed.
- an instruction may have a default instruction method and one or more variations that are implemented responsive to the instruction context.
- the preferred embodiment of the present invention described above provides for a standard load/store instruction to be extended using specifically chosen synchronization functions to be used instead of the standard instruction method when the target address is a data storage location in the gating storage.
- the preferred embodiment implements many “flavors” of the alternate synchronizing instruction method through the views (which may be referred to as access method functions) that tune a particular synchronizing load/store using the desired synchronization method.
- a problem addressed by this “extension” aspect of the present invention is that some implementations of MIPS Technologies, Inc. processors required a range of synchronizing operations that could not reasonably be directly encoded in an extension to the MIPS32/MIPS64 instruction set.
- the present invention uses a memory-like space for designated interthread communication storage (ITC) that allowed a potentially very large number of synchronized, shared variables.
- ITC interthread communication storage
- a number of operations were to be available for each location: synchronized loads/stores, semaphore operations, bypass accesses to data and control information, etc., and it was desirable for synchronized loads and stores to be available for the full range of memory data types supported by the MIPS32/MIPS64 architecture: byte, halfword, word, and doubleword.
- the preferred embodiment treats loads and stores to the designated ITC memory space as “load-plus-operation” and “store-plus-operation” instructions, where the “operation” is determined by decoding of a subset of the bits of the effective address of the load or store instruction.
- this has evolved from using a pair of bits ( 2 ** 4 and 2 ** 3 ) as a four-element opcode space, performing Empty/Full synchronization, “forcing”, “bypass”, and “control” operations on the ITC variable referenced by the higher-order address bits, to the current scheme where four bits, 2 ** 6 through 2 ** 3 , are used to create a 16-opcode space, in which the system defines “bypass”, “control”, Empty/Full synchronization, Empty/Full “try” operations, Blocking semaphore “P” and “V” operations, and Semaphore “try” operations.
- instruction methods are the procedures implemented by a processor in executing an instruction.
- the extension aspect of the present invention provides for a different set of procedures to be used when executing the same instruction when a context of the instruction indicates that a different implementation should be used.
- inventions described in this application may, of course, be embodied in hardware; e.g., within or coupled to a Central Processing Unit (“CPU”), microprocessor, microcontroller, System on Chip (“SOC”), or any other programmable device.
- embodiments may be embodied in software (e.g., computer readable code, program code, instructions and/or data disposed in any form, such as source, object or machine language) disposed, for example, in a computer usable (e.g., readable) medium configured to store the software.
- software e.g., computer readable code, program code, instructions and/or data disposed in any form, such as source, object or machine language
- a computer usable (e.g., readable) medium configured to store the software.
- Such software enables the function, fabrication, modeling, simulation, description and/or testing of the apparatus and processes described herein.
- this can be accomplished through the use of general programming languages (e.g., C, C++), GDSII databases, hardware description languages (HDL) including Verilog HDL, VHDL, AHDL (Altera HDL) and so on, or other available programs, databases, and/or circuit (i.e., schematic) capture tools.
- Such software can be disposed in any known computer usable medium including semiconductor, magnetic disk, optical disc (e.g., CD-ROM, DVD-ROM, etc.) and as a computer data signal embodied in a computer usable (e.g., readable) transmission medium (e.g., carrier wave or any other medium including digital, optical, or analog-based medium).
- the software can be transmitted over communication networks including the Internet and intranets.
- Embodiments of the invention embodied in software may be included in a semiconductor intellectual property core (e.g., embodied in HDL) and transformed to hardware in the production of integrated circuits. Additionally, implementations of the present invention may be embodied as a combination of hardware and software.
- a “computer-readable medium” for purposes of embodiments of the present invention may be any medium that can contain, store, communicate, propagate, or transport the program for use by or in connection with the instruction execution system, apparatus, system or device.
- the computer readable medium can be, by way of example only but not by limitation, an electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system, apparatus, system, device, propagation medium, or computer memory.
- a “processor” or “process” includes any human, hardware and/or software system, mechanism or component that processes data, signals or other information.
- a processor may include a system with a general-purpose central processing unit, multiple processing units, dedicated circuitry for achieving functionality, or other systems. Processing need not be limited to a geographic location, or have temporal limitations. For example, a processor may perform its functions in “real time,” “offline,” in a “batch mode,” etc. Portions of processing may be performed at different times and at different locations, by different (or the same) processing systems.
- Embodiments of the invention may be implemented by using a programmed general purpose digital computer, by using application specific integrated circuits, programmable logic devices, field programmable gate arrays, optical, chemical, biological, quantum or nanoengineered systems, components and mechanisms may be used.
- the functions of the present invention may be achieved by any means as is known in the art.
- Distributed, or networked systems, components and circuits may be used.
- Communication, or transfer, of data may be wired, wireless, or by any other means.
- any signal arrows in the drawings/ Figures should be considered only as exemplary, and not limiting, unless otherwise specifically noted.
- the term “or” as used herein is generally intended to mean “and/or” unless otherwise indicated. Combinations of components or steps will also be considered as being noted, where terminology is foreseen as rendering the ability to separate or combine is unclear.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Software Systems (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Executing Machine-Instructions (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- This application is a continuation-in-part (CIP) of the following co-pending Non-Provisional U.S. patent applications, which are hereby expressly incorporated by reference in their entireties for all purposes:
Ser. No. (Docket No.) Filing Date Title 10/929,342 27 Aug. 2004 INTEGRATED MECHANISM FOR MIPS.0189.01US SUSPENSION AND DEALLOCATION OF COMPUTATIONAL THREADS OF EXECUTION IN A PROCESSOR 10/929,102 27 Aug. 2004 MECHANISMS FOR DYNAMIC MIPS.0193.00US CONFIGURATION OF VIRTUAL PROCESSOR RESOURCES 10/928,746 27 Aug. 2004 APPARATUS, METHOD, AND INSTRUCTION MIPS.0192.00US FOR INITIATION OF CONCURRENT INSTRUCTION STREAMS IN A MULTITHREADING MICROPROCESSOR 10/929,097 27 Aug. 2004 MECHANISMS FOR SOFTWARE MIPS.0194.00US MANAGEMENT OF MULTIPLE COMPUTATIONAL CONTEXTS - This application is a continuation-in-part (CIP) of the following co-pending Non-Provisional U.S. patent applications, which are hereby expressly incorporated by reference in their entireties for all purposes:
Ser. No. (Docket No.) Filing Date Title 10/684,350 10 Oct. 2003 MECHANISMS FOR ASSURING QUALITY OF MIPS.0188.01US SERVICE FOR PROGRAMS EXECUTING ONA MULTITHREADED PROCESSOR 10/684,348 10 Oct. 2003 INTEGRATED MECHANISM FOR MIPS.0189.00US SUSPENSION AND DEALLOCATION OF COMPUTATIONAL THREADS OF EXECUTION INA PROCESSOR - Each of the applications identified in Paragraph [001] is a continuation-in-part (CIP) of each of the following co-pending Non-Provisional U.S. patent applications, which are hereby expressly incorporated by reference in their entireties for all purposes:
Ser. No. (Docket No.) Filing Date Title 10/684,350 10 Oct. 2003 MECHANISMS FOR ASSURING QUALITY OF MIPS.0188.01US SERVICE FOR PROGRAMS EXECUTING ONA MULTITHREADED PROCESSOR 10/684,348 10 Oct. 2003 INTEGRATED MECHANISM FOR MIPS.0189.00US SUSPENSION AND DEALLOCATION OF COMPUTATIONAL THREADS OF EXECUTION INA PROCESSOR - Each of the co-pending Non-Provisional U.S. patent applications identified in Paragraph [001] and Paragraph [002] above claim the benefit of the following U.S. Provisional Applications, which are hereby expressly incorporated by reference in their entireties for all purposes:
Ser. No. (Docket No.) Filing Date Title 60/499,180 28 Aug. 2003 MULTITHREADING APPLICATION SPECIFIC MIPS.0188.00US EXTENSION 60/502,358 12 Sep. 2003 MULTITHREADING APPLICATION SPECIFIC MIPS.0188.02US EXTENSION TO A PROCESSOR ARCHITECTURE 60/502,359 12 Sep. 2003 MULTITHREADING APPLICATION SPECIFIC MIPS.0188.03US EXTENSION TO A PROCESSOR ARCHITECTURE - This application is related to the following Non-Provisional U.S. patent applications:
Ser. No. (Docket No.) (Client Ref.) Filing Date Title 10/955,231 30 Sep. 2004 A SMART MEMORY BASED MIPS.0196.00US SYNCHRONIZATION CONTROLLER FOR A MULTI-THREADED MULTIPROCESSOR SOC - All of the above-referenced related patent applications and priority patent applications are hereby expressly incorporated by reference in their entireties for all purposes.
- The invention relates generally to multiprocessing systems and more specifically to multiple thread synchronization activities on one or more processing elements (real, virtual, or otherwise).
- Multiprocessing systems continue to become increasingly important in computing systems for many applications, including general purpose processing systems and embedded control systems. In the design of such multiprocessing systems, an important architectural consideration is scalability. In other words, as more hardware resources are added to a particular implementation the machine should produce higher performance. Not only do embedded implementations require increased processing power, many also require the seemingly contradictory attribute of providing low power consumption. In the context of these requirements, particularly for the embedded market, solutions are implemented as “Systems on Chip” or “SoC.” The assignee of the present application, MIPS Technologies, Inc., offers a broad range of solutions for such SoC multiprocessing systems.
- In multiprocessing systems, loss in scaling efficiency may be attributed to many different issues, including long memory latencies and waits due to synchronization. The present invention addresses improvements to synchronization among threads in a multithreaded multiprocessing environment, particularly when individual threads may be active on one or more multiple processors, on a single processor but distributed among multiple thread contexts, or resident in memory (virtualized threads).
- Synchronization in a multithreaded system refers to the activities and functions of such a multiplicity of threads that coordinate use of shared system resources (e.g., system memory and interface FIFOs) through variables storing “state” bits for producer/consumer communication and mutual exclusion (MUTEX) tasks. Important considerations for implementing any particular synchronization paradigm include designing and implementing structures and processes that provide for deadlock-free operation while being very efficient in terms of time, system resources, and other performance measurements.
- Details regarding the MIPS processor architecture are provided in the following document, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety for all purposes: D. Sweetman, See MIPS Run, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc. (1999).
- The difficulty of finding a hardware synchronization solution for a RISC processor is compounded by the nature of the RISC paradigm. A CISC paradigm is easier, in some ways, to adapt hardware resources to particular problems because the instruction set may be extended virtually without limit as instructions and operands in an instruction pipeline may be of variable length. A designer that wants to implement a special hardware synchronization instruction set is able to add new synchronization instructions easily as many CISC instruction sets already contemplate extensions to basic instruction sets. However, that solution is generally not available to designers working with RISC instruction sets. Most instructions sets are filled or nearly filled with vacancies judiciously filled after many factors are extensively considered and evaluated. What is needed is a system for extending or enhancing existing instruction sets, with such a solution particularly useful in the RISC environment, but not exclusively useful as the CISC environment may also benefit from instruction set extension.
- The present invention has been made in consideration of the above situation, and has as an object to provide a system, method, computer program product, and propagated signal which efficiently, in a specific embodiment, enables inter-thread synchronization among a plurality of threads that may be active on one or more of: multiple processors, on a single processor but distributed among multiple thread contexts, and/or resident in memory (virtualized threads) without deadlock. In a more generalized description of the preferred embodiment, a system, method, computer program, and propagated signal which efficiently enables extension of instructions and classes of instructions.
- A preferred embodiment of the present invention includes a shared resource access control system having a gating storage responsive to a plurality of control bits with the control bits derived from an access reference identifying the shared resource, the gating storage including a plurality of sets of views with each set of views including a first view and a second view with the gating storage producing a particular view from a particular one set responsive to the control bits; and a controller, coupled to the gating storage, for controlling access to the shared resource using the particular one view.
- Another preferred embodiment of the present invention includes a shared resource access control method, the method applying an access instruction for the data storage location to a memory system, the memory system including a plurality of data storage locations, each the data storage location associated with a set of views including a first view and a second view with the memory system producing a particular one view from a particular one set of views associated with the data storage location responsive to a set of control bits derived from an address identifying the data storage location; producing the particular one view from the particular one set of views; and controlling access to the data storage location using the particular one view.
- Preferred embodiments of the present also include both a computer program product having a computer readable medium carrying program instructions for accessing a memory when executed using a computing system, the executed program instructions executing a method, as well as a propagated signal on which is carried computer-executable instructions which when executed by a computing system performs a method, the method including applying an access instruction for the data storage location to a memory system, the memory system including a plurality of data storage locations, each the data storage location associated with a set of views including a first view and a second view with the memory system producing a particular one view from a particular one set of views associated with the data storage location responsive to a set of control bits derived from an address identifying the data storage location; producing the particular one view from the particular one set of views; and controlling access to the data storage location using the particular one view.
- An alternate preferred embodiment includes an apparatus for extending a load/store instruction having a target address, the apparatus including a memory system having a view associated with a data storage location identified by a tag derived from the target address, the data storage location associated with the load/store instruction, the memory system responsive to the target address to produce a particular view for the load/store instruction from the memory system; and a controller, coupled to the data storage location and to the memory system, for implementing a an load/store method for the load/store instruction using the particular view.
- Other preferred embodiments include a method, and both a computer program product and a propagated signal carrying computer-executable instructions for extending an instruction using an instruction rule when executed by a computing system, the computer-executable instructions implementing a method. This method including producing, responsive to the target address, a particular view for the load/store instruction from a memory system, the memory system having a view associated with a data storage location identified by a tag derived from the target address, the data storage location associated with the load/store instruction; and implementing a load/store method for the load/store instruction using the particular view.
-
FIG. 1 is a schematic block diagram of a preferred embodiment for a gating storage system; and -
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram illustrating a preferred implementation for an example of a bit assignment of the data elements shown inFIG. 4 . - The present invention relates to multiple thread synchronization activities on one or more processing elements. The following description is presented to enable one of ordinary skill in the art to make and use the invention and is provided in the context of a patent application and its requirements. Various modifications to the preferred embodiment and the generic principles and features described herein will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art. Thus, the present invention is not intended to be limited to the embodiment shown but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and features described herein.
- Data-driven programming models map well to multithreaded architectures. For example, threads of execution are able to read data from memory-mapped I/O FIFOs, and may be suspended for as long as it takes for a FIFO to fill, while other threads continue to execute. When the data is available, the load completes, and the incoming data may be processed directly in the load destination register without requiring any I/O interrupt service, polling, or software task scheduling.
- However, many architecture models have no provision for restartably interrupting a memory operation once a memory management unit has processed it. It would thus be impossible for a thread context of a blocked thread to be used by an exception handler, or for an operating system to swap out and re-assign such a thread context. The preferred embodiment of the present invention therefore introduces a specific implementation of a concept of “Gating Storage”—memory (or memory-like devices) that are tagged in the TLB (with extended bits or direct physical decode) as potentially requiring abort and restart of loads or stores. The abort/restart capability may require explicit support from the processor/memory interface protocols. It should be noted that in some implementations the memory is not tagged in a memory management unit; rather the memory may be direct mapped or otherwise identified.
- The gating storage, as described herein, is a special case of a more generalized concept. As described herein, the gating storage may be conceptualized as a physical address subspace with special properties. In the specific examples described above and as set forth in more detail below, this gating storage serves as an Inter-Thread Communication (ITC) storage for enabling thread-to-thread and thread-to-I/O synchronization, particularly for load/store instructions. Each 64-bit location or “cell” within this gating storage space appears at multiple consecutive addresses, or “views”, distinguished by “view” bits (e.g., bits [6:3] though other implementations may use more, fewer, or different bits) of the load/store target address. Each view may have distinct semantics for the same instruction. A fundamental property of the gating storage is that loads and stores may be precisely view-referenced by the load or store. Any blocked loads and stores resume execution when the actions of other threads of execution, or possibly those of external devices, result in the completion requirements being satisfied. As gating storage references, blocked ITC loads and stores can be precisely aborted and restarted by systems software.
- This structure has several motivations:
-
- 1. Issue bandwidth is a critical resource on multithreaded processors. Whereas spinning on a lock in a true multiprocessor system wastes only the issue bandwidth of the processor waiting on the resource, in a multithreaded processor, the act of polling the lock on the resource consumes issue bandwidth needed by the program thread holding the lock, and further delays the release of the resource. A thread blocked waiting on a value in gating storage consumes no issue bandwidth until the value is produced or consumed.
- 2. Using hardware synchronization reduces the overhead of inter-thread control and data exchanges and makes finer grained parallel computations economical. A well-behaved algorithm running on an optimal implementation may pass values between threads at a cost of a single pipelined load or store cycle for each thread.
- 3. It allows a “push model” of multiprocessor/multithread data flow to be implemented in a near-optimal way.
- For example, in some views, cells within gating storage space may be “Empty” or “Full”. A load from a cell that is Empty causes the thread issuing the load to be suspended until the cell is written to by a store from another thread. A store to a cell, when Full, causes the thread issuing the store to be suspended until a previous value has been consumed by a load.
- Such gating storage may define independent Empty and Full conditions, rather than a single Empty/Full bit, in order to allow for FIFO buffered gating storage. In a classical Empty/Full memory configuration, Empty would simply be the negation of Full. A FIFO cannot be both Empty and Full, but it is able to be neither Empty nor Full when it contains some data, but could accept more.
- It is possible that one view in an implementation is a standard empty/full synchronization construct for producers and consumers. Another view may implement classical “P/V” semaphores by blocking loads even of “full” cells when the value of the cell is zero. Other views might implement atomic semaphore “get” and “put”, or fetch-and-increment or fetch-and-decrement operations without blocking, among other types, variations, and implementations of synchronization constructs.
- As discussed above, a load/store target address may designate gating storage through a direct decode or use of special TLB entries. References to virtual memory pages whose TLB entries are tagged as gating storage resolve not to standard memory, but to a store with special attributes. Each page maps a set of 1-64 64-bit storage locations, called “cells”, each of which may be accessed in one of a multiplicity of ways, called “views” using standard load and store instructions. The view is encoded in the low order (and untranslated) view bits of a generated virtual address for the load/store target address. As included in the preferred embodiment of the present invention, a fundamental property of the gating storage is that it synchronizes executions streams. Loads and stores to/from a memory location in gating storage, as implemented, block until the state of the cell corresponds to the required conditions for completion in the selected view. A blocked load or store may be precisely aborted when necessary, and restarted by the controlling operating system when appropriate.
- Each cell of the gating storage has Empty and Full Boolean states associated with it. The cell views are then defined as follows.
TABLE I CELL VIEW DEFINITIONS Address Bits [6:3] View BIT Value Gating Storage Behavior 2#0000 Bypass: Loads/Stores do not block, and do not affect Empty/ Full 2#0001 Control: Read or Write of Status/Control Information. The bit layout described below is guaranteed valid only when the Control view is referenced via LW/SW or LD/SD instructions Data Bits Meaning 0 When set, cell is Empty and will block on an attempt to load as synchronized storage 1 When set, cell is Full and will block on an attempt to store as synchronized storage 15:2 Reserved for future architectural definition 63:16 Implementation Dependent State 2#0010 Empty/Full Synchronized view. Loads cause the issuing thread to block when cell is Empty, and set the Empty state on returning the last available load value. Stores block when the cell is Full, and set the Full state on accepting the last possible store value. Minimally, a cell contains a single value, such that the Empty bit is the complement of the Full bit. 2#0011 Empty/Full Storage “Try” view. Loads return a value of zero when cell is Empty, regardless of actual data contained. Otherwise Load behavior is same as in Empty/Full Synchronized view. Normal Stores to Full locations through the E/F Try view fail silently to update the contents of the cell, rather than block the thread. SC (Store Conditional) instructions referencing the E/F Try view indicate success or failure based on whether the ITC store succeeds or fails. 2#0100 P/V Synchronized view. Loads and stores do not modify the Empty and Full bits, both of which should be cleared as part of cell initialization for P/V semaphore use. Loads return the current cell data value when the value is non-zero, and cause an atomic post-decrement of the value. When the cell value is zero, loads block until the cell takes a non-zero value. Stores cause an atomic increment of the cell value, up to a maximal value at which they saturate. The width of the incremented/decremented field within the ITC cell need not be the full 32 or 64-bit width of the cell. It preferably, however, implements at least 15 bits of unsigned value 2#0101 P/V Storage “Try” view. Loads and stores do not modify the Empty and Full bits, both of which should be cleared as part of cell initialization for P/V semaphore use. Loads return the current cell data value, even when zero. When the load value is non-zero, an atomic post-decrement is performed of the value. Stores cause a saturating atomic increment of the cell value, as described for the P/V Synchronized view, and cannot fail 2#0110 Architecturally Reserved View 02#0111 Architecturally Reserved View 1 2#1000 Application or Implementation Specific View 0. . . Application or Implementation Specific View X 2#1111 Application or Implementation Specific View 7 - Each storage cell could thus be described by the C structure:
struct { uint64 bypass_cell uint64 ctl_cell uint64 ef_sync_cell; uint64 ef_try_cell; uint64 pv_synch_cell; uint64 pv_try_cell; uint64 res_arch[2] uint64 imp_dep[8] } ITC_cell; - where all sixteen of the elements reference the same sixty-four bits of underlying storage data. References to this storage may have access types of less than sixty-four bits (e.g. SW/LW, SH/LH SB/LB), with the same Empty/Full protocol being enforced on a per-access basis. Store/Load pairs of the same data type to a given ITC address will always reference the same data, but the byte and halfword ordering within words, and the word ordering within 64-bit doublewords, may be implementation and endianness-dependent, i.e. a SW followed by a LB from the same ITC address is not guaranteed to be portable. While the design of ITC storage allows references to be expressed in terms of C language constructs, compiler optimizations may generate sequences that break ITC protocols, and great care must be taken if ITC is directly referenced as “memory” in a high-level language.
- Systems that do not support 64-bit loads and stores need not implement all 64 bits of each cell as storage. When only 32 bits of storage are instantiated per cell, it must be visible in the least significant 32-bit word of each view, regardless of the endianness of the processor, while the results of referencing the most significant 32-bits of each view are implementation-dependent. Ignoring the 22 bit of the address on each access can satisfy this requirement. In this way a C language cast from a
unit 64 to a unit 32 reference will acquire the data on both big-endian and little-endian CPU configurations. When more than 32 bits of Control view information are required in a 32-bit ITC store, the additional control bits should be referenced using one of the implementation-dependent views. Empty and Full bits are distinct so that decoupled multi-entry data buffers, such as FIFOs can be mapped into ITC storage. - The gating storage may be saved and restored by copying the {bypass_cell, ctl_cell} pair to and from general storage. While the full data width, 64 or 32 bits, of bypass_cell must be preserved, strictly speaking, only the least significant bits of the ef_state need to be manipulated. In the case of multi-entry data buffers (e.g. FIFOs), each cell must be read using an Empty/Full view until the Control view shows the cell to be Empty to drain the buffer on a copy. The FIFO state can then be restored by performing a series of Empty/Full stores to an equivalent FIFO cell starting in an Empty state. Implementations may provide depth counters in the implementation-specific bits of the Control view to optimize this process. Software must ensure that no other accesses are made to ITC cells during the save and restore processes.
- The “physical address space” of gating storage may be made global across all VPEs and processors in a multiprocessor system as shown and described above, such that a thread is able to synchronize on a cell on a different VPE from the one on which it is executing. Global gating storage addresses could be derived from a CPUNum field of an EBase register of each VPE. CPUNum includes ten bits that correspond to the ten significant bits of storage address into the gating storage. Processors or cores designed for uniprocessor applications need not export a physical interface to the gating storage, and may treat the gating storage as a processor-internal resource.
-
FIG. 1 is a schematic block diagram of a preferred embodiment for agating storage system 100 including aview directory 105.View directory 105 contains the view as discussed above for load/store instructions implementing synchronization methods through use ofsystem 100. Adata memory 110 includes an associated data block for any gating storage data. Anaddress decoder 115 generates the tag, from an instruction or an instruction operand, as an address offset of a block within a page. An instruction that potentially references the gating storage space causesview directory 105 to be cycled at the tag generated from the operand of the instruction. Any gating storage operation is aborted whendecoder 115 resolves the virtual address translation tonon-gating system 100. When the instruction is a load/store instruction, the operand is a target address withingating storage system 100, the operand-identified function is one of the views (e.g., EF Synchronization View), and when the instruction operation is not blocked, i.e. a load from a non-Empty cell or a store to a non-Full cell, a data transfer is performed relative todata memory 110 on a subsequent cycle. Otherwise, the instruction is recorded in athread operation buffer 120 and the thread is suspended. Changes ingating storage system 100 that may affect suspended threads are retried. For example, each change of an empty/full state of a location indata memory 110 causes the affected address to be broadcast to thread operation buffers 120, where it is compared against the addresses of blocked operations. Those operations that become unblocked are retried against the new tag state, and when they succeed, the content of the particularthread operation buffer 120 is de-allocated and the associated thread unblocked by completion of the GS instruction operation. Acontrol logic function 125 arbitrates between retries and new requests. - This style of implementation allows a gating storage system “hit” where
data memory 110 is already in the state desired, to have the same timing as a cache hit, but it presupposes tight integration with an instruction generation source, for example with a processor core. Less closely coupled implementations ofgating storage system 100, where the gating storage block is instantiated more like a scratchpad RAM or an I/O device supporting a gating storage protocol, would be less core-intrusive, but may also stall the pipeline even on a “hit”. -
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram illustrating a preferred implementation for a bit assignment of the data elements shown inFIG. 1 . For example, when the applicable instruction is a load/store instruction targeting a memory location withindata memory 110, the instruction operand includes atarget address 200. In apreferred embodiment address 200 is sixty-four bits long, with a subset of bits of low order, e.g., untranslated bits [6:3] of the target address and a subset of bits of high order used as the tag or index. Other implementations may vary some, all, or none of these values. As a generalization, an operand (i.e., a target address) of a load/store instruction intogating storage 100 is sometimes referred to herein as an access reference. Controls derived from this access reference include the tag, and the view, though in other implementations, the access reference and the controls may have different constructions and/or configurations from these preferred implementations. -
View directory 105 is a special memory for views, also referred to herein as access method functions. An entry ofdirectory 105 includes aview memory entry 210. An entry ofmemory 110, also referred to herein as a data storage location, holds data at an address derived fromtarget address 200 and may include entry controls/flags/tags 220. As shown inFIG. 2 , eachentry 205 includesdata 215 and one or more entry controls (e.g., bits or flags) 220. Entry controls may include constructs such as a write-protect bit, a validity bit, control flag bit(s) discussed above that may modify operation of control logic 125 (e.g., a number of times to spin prior to an abort/exception), and/or other tags bits. - Each
entry 210 includes a multiplicity of eight-byte views, any particular one of which is selectable by the value of the view bits [6:3] of the instruction operand. Further discussion of these views appears below, however for now it is sufficient to understand that each of the views is used to alter/enhance/modify the affect of the operand and/or the affect of an instruction upon its operand, or the method by which a processor operates upon the instruction and the instruction operand. In the example set forth herein, the instruction is a load/store instruction, the instruction operand is a memory location decoded intogating storage 100 such that sixteen views are available to redefine some aspect of the operation of the load/store instruction relative to this memory location. Specifically in the preferred embodiment, the views define possible synchronization constructs, functions, or methods that may be used accessing the particular memory location, such as using an Empty/Full primitive or a P/V semaphore. An inter-thread communication control unit (ITU), e.g.,control logic 125 or the ITU as described in the incorporated patent application, accesses a memory location consistent with the desired synchronization construct selected by the appropriate view. In other cases, the constructs, functions, or methods maybe other than synchronization-related for load/store instructions. In some cases, other instructions may be processed through a memory system having access method functions applied dependent upon an associated operand. - Gating storage is an attribute of memory which may optionally be supported by processors implementing embodiments of the present invention. The user-mode load/store semantics of gating storage are identical with those of normal memory, except that completion of the operation may be blocked for unbounded periods of time. The distinguishing feature of gating storage is that outstanding load or store operations can be aborted and restarted. Preferably it is a TLB-mediated property of a virtual page whether or not a location is treated as gating storage (though other mechanisms may be implemented to identify gating storage locations).
- When a load or store operation is performed on gating storage, no instructions beyond the load/store in program order are allowed to alter software-visible states of the system until a load result or store confirmation is returned from storage. In the event that an exception is taken using the thread context of an instruction stream which is blocked on a load/store to gating storage, or in the event where such a thread is halted by setting a ThreadStatus.H bit of the associated thread context, the pending load/store operation is aborted.
- When a load or store is aborted, the abort is signaled to the storage subsystem, such that the operation unambiguously either completes or is abandoned without any side effects. When a load operation is abandoned, any hardware interlocks on the load dependence are released, so that the destination register may be used as an operand source, with its preload value.
- After an aborted and abandoned load/store, a program counter as seen by the exception program counter register and the branch delay state as seen by a Cause.BD bit are set so as that an execution of an exception return (ERET) by the instruction stream associated by the thread context, or a clearing of the thread context halted state, causes a re-issue of the gating load/store. Gating storage accesses are never cached, and multiple stores to a gating storage address are never merged by a processor.
- While the preceding description provides a complete description of a specific implementation of a gating storage for inter-thread communication in the synchronization of load/store instructions, the present invention has a broader implementation as well. In the more generalized case, gating storage provides a simple and efficient mechanism to extend an instruction set (particularly advantageous to processors implementing RISC instruction sets). This aspect of the present invention uses an operand of an instruction to modify, enhance, substitute, or otherwise affect an instruction using hardware features. In the load/store example used throughout this discussion, the gating storage adds multiple load/store commands to the basic instruction set, each of the added commands a variant of the basic command but including a hardware-managed instruction that implements a wide variety of synchronization constructs in the process of completing a load or a store. Normal loads/stores are still available by not including an operand within the gating storage. However, by modifying an instruction by use of special memory having special instruction functions/methods triggered from the operand may be implemented to extend many types of instructions in many different ways.
- The inherently restricted number and complexity of instruction operand encodings in a “RISC” instruction set is augmented by adding computational semantics to basic instructions (e.g., RISC storage access instructions such as loads and stores), by using an instruction context (e.g., a portion of the storage address of the load or store as an opcode extension) to express a calculation or control function to be executed. This provides that an instruction may have a default instruction method and one or more variations that are implemented responsive to the instruction context. The preferred embodiment of the present invention described above provides for a standard load/store instruction to be extended using specifically chosen synchronization functions to be used instead of the standard instruction method when the target address is a data storage location in the gating storage. The preferred embodiment implements many “flavors” of the alternate synchronizing instruction method through the views (which may be referred to as access method functions) that tune a particular synchronizing load/store using the desired synchronization method.
- A problem addressed by this “extension” aspect of the present invention is that some implementations of MIPS Technologies, Inc. processors required a range of synchronizing operations that could not reasonably be directly encoded in an extension to the MIPS32/MIPS64 instruction set. The present invention uses a memory-like space for designated interthread communication storage (ITC) that allowed a potentially very large number of synchronized, shared variables. A number of operations were to be available for each location: synchronized loads/stores, semaphore operations, bypass accesses to data and control information, etc., and it was desirable for synchronized loads and stores to be available for the full range of memory data types supported by the MIPS32/MIPS64 architecture: byte, halfword, word, and doubleword.
- Rather than invent new instructions that perform distinct operations on the memory address expressed to the instruction, the preferred embodiment treats loads and stores to the designated ITC memory space as “load-plus-operation” and “store-plus-operation” instructions, where the “operation” is determined by decoding of a subset of the bits of the effective address of the load or store instruction. In the case of the preferred embodiment, this has evolved from using a pair of bits (2**4 and 2**3) as a four-element opcode space, performing Empty/Full synchronization, “forcing”, “bypass”, and “control” operations on the ITC variable referenced by the higher-order address bits, to the current scheme where four bits, 2**6 through 2**3, are used to create a 16-opcode space, in which the system defines “bypass”, “control”, Empty/Full synchronization, Empty/Full “try” operations, Blocking semaphore “P” and “V” operations, and Semaphore “try” operations. This is but one example of how an instruction may be extended using a context of the instruction to determine an applicable instruction method to be used. Other extensions are possible to load/store instructions, other extensions are possible for other instructions, particularly those having an associated operand. However, other instructions may be extended by using some other contextual information to differentiate between instances in which a default instruction method is to be used and when an alternate instruction method. In the present context, instruction methods are the procedures implemented by a processor in executing an instruction. The extension aspect of the present invention provides for a different set of procedures to be used when executing the same instruction when a context of the instruction indicates that a different implementation should be used.
- The invention described in this application may, of course, be embodied in hardware; e.g., within or coupled to a Central Processing Unit (“CPU”), microprocessor, microcontroller, System on Chip (“SOC”), or any other programmable device. Additionally, embodiments may be embodied in software (e.g., computer readable code, program code, instructions and/or data disposed in any form, such as source, object or machine language) disposed, for example, in a computer usable (e.g., readable) medium configured to store the software. Such software enables the function, fabrication, modeling, simulation, description and/or testing of the apparatus and processes described herein. For example, this can be accomplished through the use of general programming languages (e.g., C, C++), GDSII databases, hardware description languages (HDL) including Verilog HDL, VHDL, AHDL (Altera HDL) and so on, or other available programs, databases, and/or circuit (i.e., schematic) capture tools. Such software can be disposed in any known computer usable medium including semiconductor, magnetic disk, optical disc (e.g., CD-ROM, DVD-ROM, etc.) and as a computer data signal embodied in a computer usable (e.g., readable) transmission medium (e.g., carrier wave or any other medium including digital, optical, or analog-based medium). As such, the software can be transmitted over communication networks including the Internet and intranets. Embodiments of the invention embodied in software may be included in a semiconductor intellectual property core (e.g., embodied in HDL) and transformed to hardware in the production of integrated circuits. Additionally, implementations of the present invention may be embodied as a combination of hardware and software.
- In the description herein, numerous specific details are provided, such as examples of components and/or methods, to provide a thorough understanding of embodiments of the present invention. One skilled in the relevant art will recognize, however, that an embodiment of the invention can be practiced without one or more of the specific details, or with other apparatus, systems, assemblies, methods, components, materials, parts, and/or the like. In other instances, well-known structures, materials, or operations are not specifically shown or described in detail to avoid obscuring aspects of embodiments of the present invention.
- A “computer-readable medium” for purposes of embodiments of the present invention may be any medium that can contain, store, communicate, propagate, or transport the program for use by or in connection with the instruction execution system, apparatus, system or device. The computer readable medium can be, by way of example only but not by limitation, an electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system, apparatus, system, device, propagation medium, or computer memory.
- A “processor” or “process” includes any human, hardware and/or software system, mechanism or component that processes data, signals or other information. A processor may include a system with a general-purpose central processing unit, multiple processing units, dedicated circuitry for achieving functionality, or other systems. Processing need not be limited to a geographic location, or have temporal limitations. For example, a processor may perform its functions in “real time,” “offline,” in a “batch mode,” etc. Portions of processing may be performed at different times and at different locations, by different (or the same) processing systems.
- Reference throughout this specification to “one embodiment”, “an embodiment”, or “a specific embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the present invention and not necessarily in all embodiments. Thus, respective appearances of the phrases “in one embodiment”, “in an embodiment”, or “in a specific embodiment” in various places throughout this specification are not necessarily referring to the same embodiment. Furthermore, the particular features, structures, or characteristics of any specific embodiment of the present invention may be combined in any suitable manner with one or more other embodiments. It is to be understood that other variations and modifications of the embodiments of the present invention described and illustrated herein are possible in light of the teachings herein and are to be considered as part of the spirit and scope of the present invention.
- Embodiments of the invention may be implemented by using a programmed general purpose digital computer, by using application specific integrated circuits, programmable logic devices, field programmable gate arrays, optical, chemical, biological, quantum or nanoengineered systems, components and mechanisms may be used. In general, the functions of the present invention may be achieved by any means as is known in the art. Distributed, or networked systems, components and circuits may be used. Communication, or transfer, of data may be wired, wireless, or by any other means.
- It will also be appreciated that one or more of the elements depicted in the drawings/figures may also be implemented in a more separated or integrated manner, or even removed or rendered as inoperable in certain cases, as is useful in accordance with a particular application. It is also within the spirit and scope of the present invention to implement a program or code that may be stored in a machine-readable medium or transmitted using a carrier wave to permit a computer to perform any of the methods described above.
- Additionally, any signal arrows in the drawings/Figures should be considered only as exemplary, and not limiting, unless otherwise specifically noted. Furthermore, the term “or” as used herein is generally intended to mean “and/or” unless otherwise indicated. Combinations of components or steps will also be considered as being noted, where terminology is foreseen as rendering the ability to separate or combine is unclear.
- As used in the description herein and throughout the claims that follow, “a”, “an”, and “the” includes plural references unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Also, as used in the description herein and throughout the claims that follow, the meaning of “in” includes “in” and “on” unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.
- The foregoing description of illustrated embodiments of the present invention, including what is described in the Abstract, is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed herein. While specific embodiments of, and examples for, the invention are described herein for illustrative purposes only, various equivalent modifications are possible within the spirit and scope of the present invention, as those skilled in the relevant art will recognize and appreciate. As indicated, these modifications may be made to the present invention in light of the foregoing description of illustrated embodiments of the present invention and are to be included within the spirit and scope of the present invention.
- Thus, while the present invention has been described herein with reference to particular embodiments thereof, a latitude of modification, various changes and substitutions are intended in the foregoing disclosures, and it will be appreciated that in some instances some features of embodiments of the invention will be employed without a corresponding use of other features without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention as set forth. Therefore, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the essential scope and spirit of the present invention. It is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular terms used in following claims and/or to the particular embodiment disclosed as the best mode contemplated for carrying out this invention, but that the invention will include any and all embodiments and equivalents falling within the scope of the appended claims.
- The above-described arrangements of apparatus and methods are merely illustrative of applications of the principles of this invention and many other embodiments and modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the claims.
- These and other novel aspects of the present invention will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art upon review of the drawings and the remaining portions of the specification. Therefore, the scope of the invention is to be determined solely by the appended claims.
Claims (91)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/954,988 US7711931B2 (en) | 2003-08-28 | 2004-09-30 | Synchronized storage providing multiple synchronization semantics |
Applications Claiming Priority (10)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US49918003P | 2003-08-28 | 2003-08-28 | |
US50235803P | 2003-09-12 | 2003-09-12 | |
US50235903P | 2003-09-12 | 2003-09-12 | |
US10/684,348 US20050050305A1 (en) | 2003-08-28 | 2003-10-10 | Integrated mechanism for suspension and deallocation of computational threads of execution in a processor |
US10/684,350 US7376954B2 (en) | 2003-08-28 | 2003-10-10 | Mechanisms for assuring quality of service for programs executing on a multithreaded processor |
US10/929,342 US7321965B2 (en) | 2003-08-28 | 2004-08-27 | Integrated mechanism for suspension and deallocation of computational threads of execution in a processor |
US10/929,102 US7694304B2 (en) | 2003-08-28 | 2004-08-27 | Mechanisms for dynamic configuration of virtual processor resources |
US10/928,746 US7610473B2 (en) | 2003-08-28 | 2004-08-27 | Apparatus, method, and instruction for initiation of concurrent instruction streams in a multithreading microprocessor |
US10/929,097 US7424599B2 (en) | 2003-08-28 | 2004-08-27 | Apparatus, method, and instruction for software management of multiple computational contexts in a multithreaded microprocessor |
US10/954,988 US7711931B2 (en) | 2003-08-28 | 2004-09-30 | Synchronized storage providing multiple synchronization semantics |
Related Parent Applications (3)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/684,348 Continuation-In-Part US20050050305A1 (en) | 2003-08-28 | 2003-10-10 | Integrated mechanism for suspension and deallocation of computational threads of execution in a processor |
US10/684,350 Continuation-In-Part US7376954B2 (en) | 2003-08-28 | 2003-10-10 | Mechanisms for assuring quality of service for programs executing on a multithreaded processor |
US10/929,342 Continuation-In-Part US7321965B2 (en) | 2003-08-28 | 2004-08-27 | Integrated mechanism for suspension and deallocation of computational threads of execution in a processor |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20050251613A1 US20050251613A1 (en) | 2005-11-10 |
US20070186028A2 true US20070186028A2 (en) | 2007-08-09 |
US7711931B2 US7711931B2 (en) | 2010-05-04 |
Family
ID=38353026
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/954,988 Active 2026-08-23 US7711931B2 (en) | 2003-08-28 | 2004-09-30 | Synchronized storage providing multiple synchronization semantics |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US7711931B2 (en) |
Cited By (34)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20050120194A1 (en) * | 2003-08-28 | 2005-06-02 | Mips Technologies, Inc. | Apparatus, method, and instruction for initiation of concurrent instruction streams in a multithreading microprocessor |
US20050251639A1 (en) * | 2003-08-28 | 2005-11-10 | Mips Technologies, Inc. A Delaware Corporation | Smart memory based synchronization controller for a multi-threaded multiprocessor SoC |
US20060161421A1 (en) * | 2003-08-28 | 2006-07-20 | Mips Technologies, Inc. | Software emulation of directed exceptions in a multithreading processor |
US20060190946A1 (en) * | 2003-08-28 | 2006-08-24 | Mips Technologies, Inc. | Symmetric multiprocessor operating system for execution on non-independent lightweight thread context |
US20060190945A1 (en) * | 2003-08-28 | 2006-08-24 | Mips Technologies, Inc. | Symmetric multiprocessor operating system for execution on non-independent lightweight thread context |
US20070106989A1 (en) * | 2003-08-28 | 2007-05-10 | Mips Technologies, Inc. | Symmetric multiprocessor operating system for execution on non-independent lightweight thread contexts |
US20100293341A1 (en) * | 2008-02-01 | 2010-11-18 | Arimilli Ravi K | Wake-and-Go Mechanism with Exclusive System Bus Response |
US20110113220A1 (en) * | 2008-06-19 | 2011-05-12 | Hiroyuki Morishita | Multiprocessor |
US8082315B2 (en) | 2009-04-16 | 2011-12-20 | International Business Machines Corporation | Programming idiom accelerator for remote update |
US8127080B2 (en) | 2008-02-01 | 2012-02-28 | International Business Machines Corporation | Wake-and-go mechanism with system address bus transaction master |
US8145723B2 (en) | 2009-04-16 | 2012-03-27 | International Business Machines Corporation | Complex remote update programming idiom accelerator |
US8145849B2 (en) | 2008-02-01 | 2012-03-27 | International Business Machines Corporation | Wake-and-go mechanism with system bus response |
US8171476B2 (en) | 2008-02-01 | 2012-05-01 | International Business Machines Corporation | Wake-and-go mechanism with prioritization of threads |
US8225120B2 (en) | 2008-02-01 | 2012-07-17 | International Business Machines Corporation | Wake-and-go mechanism with data exclusivity |
US8230201B2 (en) | 2009-04-16 | 2012-07-24 | International Business Machines Corporation | Migrating sleeping and waking threads between wake-and-go mechanisms in a multiple processor data processing system |
US8250396B2 (en) | 2008-02-01 | 2012-08-21 | International Business Machines Corporation | Hardware wake-and-go mechanism for a data processing system |
US8312458B2 (en) | 2008-02-01 | 2012-11-13 | International Business Machines Corporation | Central repository for wake-and-go mechanism |
US8316218B2 (en) | 2008-02-01 | 2012-11-20 | International Business Machines Corporation | Look-ahead wake-and-go engine with speculative execution |
US8341635B2 (en) | 2008-02-01 | 2012-12-25 | International Business Machines Corporation | Hardware wake-and-go mechanism with look-ahead polling |
US8386822B2 (en) | 2008-02-01 | 2013-02-26 | International Business Machines Corporation | Wake-and-go mechanism with data monitoring |
US8452947B2 (en) | 2008-02-01 | 2013-05-28 | International Business Machines Corporation | Hardware wake-and-go mechanism and content addressable memory with instruction pre-fetch look-ahead to detect programming idioms |
US8516484B2 (en) | 2008-02-01 | 2013-08-20 | International Business Machines Corporation | Wake-and-go mechanism for a data processing system |
US8612977B2 (en) | 2008-02-01 | 2013-12-17 | International Business Machines Corporation | Wake-and-go mechanism with software save of thread state |
US8640141B2 (en) | 2008-02-01 | 2014-01-28 | International Business Machines Corporation | Wake-and-go mechanism with hardware private array |
US8725992B2 (en) | 2008-02-01 | 2014-05-13 | International Business Machines Corporation | Programming language exposing idiom calls to a programming idiom accelerator |
US8732683B2 (en) | 2008-02-01 | 2014-05-20 | International Business Machines Corporation | Compiler providing idiom to idiom accelerator |
US8788795B2 (en) | 2008-02-01 | 2014-07-22 | International Business Machines Corporation | Programming idiom accelerator to examine pre-fetched instruction streams for multiple processors |
US20140281909A1 (en) * | 2013-03-14 | 2014-09-18 | Thoughtwire Holdings Corp. | Method and system for generating a view |
US8880853B2 (en) | 2008-02-01 | 2014-11-04 | International Business Machines Corporation | CAM-based wake-and-go snooping engine for waking a thread put to sleep for spinning on a target address lock |
US8886919B2 (en) | 2009-04-16 | 2014-11-11 | International Business Machines Corporation | Remote update programming idiom accelerator with allocated processor resources |
US9032404B2 (en) | 2003-08-28 | 2015-05-12 | Mips Technologies, Inc. | Preemptive multitasking employing software emulation of directed exceptions in a multithreading processor |
US9417882B2 (en) | 2013-12-23 | 2016-08-16 | International Business Machines Corporation | Load synchronization with streaming thread cohorts |
US9742843B2 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2017-08-22 | Thoughtwire Holdings Corp. | Method and system for enabling data sharing between software systems |
US11782859B2 (en) | 2008-11-10 | 2023-10-10 | Micron Technology, Inc. | Methods and systems for devices with self-selecting bus decoder |
Families Citing this family (25)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7711931B2 (en) * | 2003-08-28 | 2010-05-04 | Mips Technologies, Inc. | Synchronized storage providing multiple synchronization semantics |
US7376954B2 (en) * | 2003-08-28 | 2008-05-20 | Mips Technologies, Inc. | Mechanisms for assuring quality of service for programs executing on a multithreaded processor |
US20050050305A1 (en) * | 2003-08-28 | 2005-03-03 | Kissell Kevin D. | Integrated mechanism for suspension and deallocation of computational threads of execution in a processor |
US7093100B2 (en) * | 2003-11-14 | 2006-08-15 | International Business Machines Corporation | Translation look aside buffer (TLB) with increased translational capacity for multi-threaded computer processes |
US8756350B2 (en) | 2007-06-26 | 2014-06-17 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for efficiently tracking queue entries relative to a timestamp |
US7984448B2 (en) * | 2007-06-26 | 2011-07-19 | International Business Machines Corporation | Mechanism to support generic collective communication across a variety of programming models |
US7886084B2 (en) | 2007-06-26 | 2011-02-08 | International Business Machines Corporation | Optimized collectives using a DMA on a parallel computer |
US8010875B2 (en) | 2007-06-26 | 2011-08-30 | International Business Machines Corporation | Error correcting code with chip kill capability and power saving enhancement |
US7797503B2 (en) * | 2007-06-26 | 2010-09-14 | International Business Machines Corporation | Configurable memory system and method for providing atomic counting operations in a memory device |
US8509255B2 (en) | 2007-06-26 | 2013-08-13 | International Business Machines Corporation | Hardware packet pacing using a DMA in a parallel computer |
US8032892B2 (en) * | 2007-06-26 | 2011-10-04 | International Business Machines Corporation | Message passing with a limited number of DMA byte counters |
US7827391B2 (en) | 2007-06-26 | 2010-11-02 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for single-stepping coherence events in a multiprocessor system under software control |
US7793038B2 (en) | 2007-06-26 | 2010-09-07 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for programmable bank selection for banked memory subsystems |
US8468416B2 (en) | 2007-06-26 | 2013-06-18 | International Business Machines Corporation | Combined group ECC protection and subgroup parity protection |
US8103832B2 (en) * | 2007-06-26 | 2012-01-24 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus of prefetching streams of varying prefetch depth |
US8140925B2 (en) | 2007-06-26 | 2012-03-20 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus to debug an integrated circuit chip via synchronous clock stop and scan |
US7802025B2 (en) | 2007-06-26 | 2010-09-21 | International Business Machines Corporation | DMA engine for repeating communication patterns |
US8458282B2 (en) | 2007-06-26 | 2013-06-04 | International Business Machines Corporation | Extended write combining using a write continuation hint flag |
US8108738B2 (en) | 2007-06-26 | 2012-01-31 | International Business Machines Corporation | Data eye monitor method and apparatus |
US8230433B2 (en) | 2007-06-26 | 2012-07-24 | International Business Machines Corporation | Shared performance monitor in a multiprocessor system |
US7877551B2 (en) * | 2007-06-26 | 2011-01-25 | International Business Machines Corporation | Programmable partitioning for high-performance coherence domains in a multiprocessor system |
US8032706B2 (en) * | 2008-08-05 | 2011-10-04 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus for detecting a data access violation |
US20100125717A1 (en) * | 2008-11-17 | 2010-05-20 | Mois Navon | Synchronization Controller For Multiple Multi-Threaded Processors |
US8561040B2 (en) * | 2009-03-10 | 2013-10-15 | Oracle America, Inc. | One-pass compilation of virtual instructions |
US9081628B2 (en) | 2011-05-27 | 2015-07-14 | Intel Corporation | Detecting potential access errors in a multi-threaded application |
Citations (88)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4817051A (en) * | 1987-07-02 | 1989-03-28 | Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation | Expandable multi-port random access memory |
US4860190A (en) * | 1985-09-03 | 1989-08-22 | Fujitsu Limited | Computer system for controlling virtual machines |
US5159686A (en) * | 1988-02-29 | 1992-10-27 | Convex Computer Corporation | Multi-processor computer system having process-independent communication register addressing |
US5295265A (en) * | 1991-06-04 | 1994-03-15 | Sextant Avionique | Device for enhancing the performance of a real time executive kernel associated with a multiprocessor structure that can include a large number of processors |
US5428754A (en) * | 1988-03-23 | 1995-06-27 | 3Dlabs Ltd | Computer system with clock shared between processors executing separate instruction streams |
US5499349A (en) * | 1989-05-26 | 1996-03-12 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Pipelined processor with fork, join, and start instructions using tokens to indicate the next instruction for each of multiple threads of execution |
US5511192A (en) * | 1991-11-30 | 1996-04-23 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Method and apparatus for managing thread private data in a parallel processing computer |
US5515538A (en) * | 1992-05-29 | 1996-05-07 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Apparatus and method for interrupt handling in a multi-threaded operating system kernel |
US5659786A (en) * | 1992-10-19 | 1997-08-19 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for dynamically performing resource reconfiguration in a logically partitioned data processing system |
US5727203A (en) * | 1995-03-31 | 1998-03-10 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for managing a database in a distributed object operating environment using persistent and transient cache |
US5758142A (en) * | 1994-05-31 | 1998-05-26 | Digital Equipment Corporation | Trainable apparatus for predicting instruction outcomes in pipelined processors |
US5799188A (en) * | 1995-12-15 | 1998-08-25 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for managing variable weight thread contexts in a multithreaded computer system |
US5812811A (en) * | 1995-02-03 | 1998-09-22 | International Business Machines Corporation | Executing speculative parallel instructions threads with forking and inter-thread communication |
US5835748A (en) * | 1995-12-19 | 1998-11-10 | Intel Corporation | Method for executing different sets of instructions that cause a processor to perform different data type operations on different physical registers files that logically appear to software as a single aliased register file |
US5867704A (en) * | 1995-02-24 | 1999-02-02 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Multiprocessor system shaving processor based idle state detection and method of executing tasks in such a multiprocessor system |
US5892934A (en) * | 1996-04-02 | 1999-04-06 | Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | Microprocessor configured to detect a branch to a DSP routine and to direct a DSP to execute said routine |
US5933627A (en) * | 1996-07-01 | 1999-08-03 | Sun Microsystems | Thread switch on blocked load or store using instruction thread field |
US5944816A (en) * | 1996-05-17 | 1999-08-31 | Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | Microprocessor configured to execute multiple threads including interrupt service routines |
US5949994A (en) * | 1997-02-12 | 1999-09-07 | The Dow Chemical Company | Dedicated context-cycling computer with timed context |
US5961584A (en) * | 1994-12-09 | 1999-10-05 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson | System for managing internal execution threads |
US6061710A (en) * | 1997-10-29 | 2000-05-09 | International Business Machines Corporation | Multithreaded processor incorporating a thread latch register for interrupt service new pending threads |
US6088787A (en) * | 1998-03-30 | 2000-07-11 | Celestica International Inc. | Enhanced program counter stack for multi-tasking central processing unit |
US6128720A (en) * | 1994-12-29 | 2000-10-03 | International Business Machines Corporation | Distributed processing array with component processors performing customized interpretation of instructions |
US6175916B1 (en) * | 1997-05-06 | 2001-01-16 | Microsoft Corporation | Common-thread inter-process function calls invoked by jumps to invalid addresses |
US6189093B1 (en) * | 1998-07-21 | 2001-02-13 | Lsi Logic Corporation | System for initiating exception routine in response to memory access exception by storing exception information and exception bit within architectured register |
US6205543B1 (en) * | 1998-12-03 | 2001-03-20 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Efficient handling of a large register file for context switching |
US6223228B1 (en) * | 1998-09-17 | 2001-04-24 | Bull Hn Information Systems Inc. | Apparatus for synchronizing multiple processors in a data processing system |
US6240531B1 (en) * | 1997-09-30 | 2001-05-29 | Networks Associates Inc. | System and method for computer operating system protection |
US6253306B1 (en) * | 1998-07-29 | 2001-06-26 | Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | Prefetch instruction mechanism for processor |
US6286027B1 (en) * | 1998-11-30 | 2001-09-04 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Two step thread creation with register renaming |
US6330656B1 (en) * | 1999-03-31 | 2001-12-11 | International Business Machines Corporation | PCI slot control apparatus with dynamic configuration for partitioned systems |
US6330661B1 (en) * | 1998-04-28 | 2001-12-11 | Nec Corporation | Reducing inherited logical to physical register mapping information between tasks in multithread system using register group identifier |
US6401155B1 (en) * | 1998-12-22 | 2002-06-04 | Philips Electronics North America Corporation | Interrupt/software-controlled thread processing |
US20020083278A1 (en) * | 2000-12-22 | 2002-06-27 | Bull Hn Information Systems Inc. | Method and data processing system for performing atomic multiple word writes |
US20020083173A1 (en) * | 2000-02-08 | 2002-06-27 | Enrique Musoll | Method and apparatus for optimizing selection of available contexts for packet processing in multi-stream packet processing |
US20020091915A1 (en) * | 2001-01-11 | 2002-07-11 | Parady Bodo K. | Load prediction and thread identification in a multithreaded microprocessor |
US20020103847A1 (en) * | 2001-02-01 | 2002-08-01 | Hanan Potash | Efficient mechanism for inter-thread communication within a multi-threaded computer system |
US20020147760A1 (en) * | 1996-07-12 | 2002-10-10 | Nec Corporation | Multi-processor system executing a plurality of threads simultaneously and an execution method therefor |
US20020174318A1 (en) * | 1999-04-09 | 2002-11-21 | Dave Stuttard | Parallel data processing apparatus |
US20030014471A1 (en) * | 2001-07-12 | 2003-01-16 | Nec Corporation | Multi-thread execution method and parallel processor system |
US20030074545A1 (en) * | 2001-10-12 | 2003-04-17 | Uhler G. Michael | Method and apparatus for binding shadow registers to vectored interrupts |
US20030079094A1 (en) * | 2001-10-19 | 2003-04-24 | Ravi Rajwar | Concurrent execution of critical sections by eliding ownership of locks |
US20030093652A1 (en) * | 2001-11-14 | 2003-05-15 | Song Seungyoon Peter | Operand file using pointers and reference counters and a method of use |
US20030105796A1 (en) * | 2001-12-05 | 2003-06-05 | Sandri Jason G. | Method and apparatus for controlling access to shared resources in an environment with multiple logical processors |
US20030115245A1 (en) * | 2001-12-17 | 2003-06-19 | Kunimasa Fujisawa | Multi-application execution system and method thereof |
US20030126416A1 (en) * | 2001-12-31 | 2003-07-03 | Marr Deborah T. | Suspending execution of a thread in a multi-threaded processor |
US6591379B1 (en) * | 2000-06-23 | 2003-07-08 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and system for injecting an exception to recover unsaved data |
US6643759B2 (en) * | 2001-03-30 | 2003-11-04 | Mips Technologies, Inc. | Mechanism to extend computer memory protection schemes |
US20030225816A1 (en) * | 2002-06-03 | 2003-12-04 | Morrow Michael W. | Architecture to support multiple concurrent threads of execution on an arm-compatible processor |
US6668308B2 (en) * | 2000-06-10 | 2003-12-23 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Scalable architecture based on single-chip multiprocessing |
US6671791B1 (en) * | 2001-06-15 | 2003-12-30 | Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | Processor including a translation unit for selectively translating virtual addresses of different sizes using a plurality of paging tables and mapping mechanisms |
US6675192B2 (en) * | 1999-10-01 | 2004-01-06 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Temporary halting of thread execution until monitoring of armed events to memory location identified in working registers |
US20040015684A1 (en) * | 2002-05-30 | 2004-01-22 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method, apparatus and computer program product for scheduling multiple threads for a processor |
US6687812B1 (en) * | 1999-04-20 | 2004-02-03 | Nec Corporation | Parallel processing apparatus |
US6697935B1 (en) * | 1997-10-23 | 2004-02-24 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for selecting thread switch events in a multithreaded processor |
US6738796B1 (en) * | 1999-10-08 | 2004-05-18 | Globespanvirata, Inc. | Optimization of memory requirements for multi-threaded operating systems |
US20040139306A1 (en) * | 2003-01-09 | 2004-07-15 | Sony Corporation | Partial and start-over threads in embedded real-time kernel |
US6779065B2 (en) * | 2001-08-31 | 2004-08-17 | Intel Corporation | Mechanism for interrupt handling in computer systems that support concurrent execution of multiple threads |
US6877083B2 (en) * | 2001-10-16 | 2005-04-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | Address mapping mechanism for behavioral memory enablement within a data processing system |
US6889319B1 (en) * | 1999-12-09 | 2005-05-03 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus for entering and exiting multiple threads within a multithreaded processor |
US6920634B1 (en) * | 1998-08-03 | 2005-07-19 | International Business Machines Corporation | Detecting and causing unsafe latent accesses to a resource in multi-threaded programs |
US6922745B2 (en) * | 2002-05-02 | 2005-07-26 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus for handling locks |
US6925550B2 (en) * | 2002-01-02 | 2005-08-02 | Intel Corporation | Speculative scheduling of instructions with source operand validity bit and rescheduling upon carried over destination operand invalid bit detection |
US20050251613A1 (en) * | 2003-08-28 | 2005-11-10 | Mips Technologies, Inc., A Delaware Corporation | Synchronized storage providing multiple synchronization semantics |
US20050251639A1 (en) * | 2003-08-28 | 2005-11-10 | Mips Technologies, Inc. A Delaware Corporation | Smart memory based synchronization controller for a multi-threaded multiprocessor SoC |
US6971103B2 (en) * | 2002-10-15 | 2005-11-29 | Sandbridge Technologies, Inc. | Inter-thread communications using shared interrupt register |
US6986140B2 (en) * | 2000-02-17 | 2006-01-10 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method for determining idle processor load balancing in a multiple processors system |
US6993598B2 (en) * | 2003-10-09 | 2006-01-31 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for efficient sharing of DMA resource |
US7020879B1 (en) * | 1998-12-16 | 2006-03-28 | Mips Technologies, Inc. | Interrupt and exception handling for multi-streaming digital processors |
US7065094B2 (en) * | 2000-07-05 | 2006-06-20 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Method and device in a coupling node for a telecommunication system |
US7069421B1 (en) * | 1999-01-28 | 2006-06-27 | Ati Technologies, Srl | Side tables annotating an instruction stream |
US7073042B2 (en) * | 2002-12-12 | 2006-07-04 | Intel Corporation | Reclaiming existing fields in address translation data structures to extend control over memory accesses |
US20060161921A1 (en) * | 2003-08-28 | 2006-07-20 | Mips Technologies, Inc. | Preemptive multitasking employing software emulation of directed exceptions in a multithreading processor |
US20060161421A1 (en) * | 2003-08-28 | 2006-07-20 | Mips Technologies, Inc. | Software emulation of directed exceptions in a multithreading processor |
US7093106B2 (en) * | 2003-04-23 | 2006-08-15 | International Business Machines Corporation | Register rename array with individual thread bits set upon allocation and cleared upon instruction completion |
US20060190945A1 (en) * | 2003-08-28 | 2006-08-24 | Mips Technologies, Inc. | Symmetric multiprocessor operating system for execution on non-independent lightweight thread context |
US20060190946A1 (en) * | 2003-08-28 | 2006-08-24 | Mips Technologies, Inc. | Symmetric multiprocessor operating system for execution on non-independent lightweight thread context |
US20060195683A1 (en) * | 2003-08-28 | 2006-08-31 | Mips Technologies, Inc. | Symmetric multiprocessor operating system for execution on non-independent lightweight thread contexts |
US20060206686A1 (en) * | 2005-03-08 | 2006-09-14 | Mips Technologies, Inc. | Three-tiered translation lookaside buffer hierarchy in a multithreading microprocessor |
US7127561B2 (en) * | 2001-12-31 | 2006-10-24 | Intel Corporation | Coherency techniques for suspending execution of a thread until a specified memory access occurs |
US7134124B2 (en) * | 2001-07-12 | 2006-11-07 | Nec Corporation | Thread ending method and device and parallel processor system |
US7181600B1 (en) * | 2001-08-02 | 2007-02-20 | Mips Technologies, Inc. | Read-only access to CPO registers |
US7185183B1 (en) * | 2001-08-02 | 2007-02-27 | Mips Technologies, Inc. | Atomic update of CPO state |
US7185185B2 (en) * | 1999-05-11 | 2007-02-27 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Multiple-thread processor with in-pipeline, thread selectable storage |
US7216338B2 (en) * | 2002-02-20 | 2007-05-08 | Microsoft Corporation | Conformance execution of non-deterministic specifications for components |
US7321965B2 (en) * | 2003-08-28 | 2008-01-22 | Mips Technologies, Inc. | Integrated mechanism for suspension and deallocation of computational threads of execution in a processor |
US7376954B2 (en) * | 2003-08-28 | 2008-05-20 | Mips Technologies, Inc. | Mechanisms for assuring quality of service for programs executing on a multithreaded processor |
US7386636B2 (en) * | 2005-08-19 | 2008-06-10 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for communicating command parameters between a processor and a memory flow controller |
Family Cites Families (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6647508B2 (en) | 1997-11-04 | 2003-11-11 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Multiprocessor computer architecture with multiple operating system instances and software controlled resource allocation |
US6986137B1 (en) | 1999-09-28 | 2006-01-10 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method, system and program products for managing logical processors of a computing environment |
US6671795B1 (en) | 2000-01-21 | 2003-12-30 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus for pausing execution in a processor or the like |
US7428485B2 (en) | 2001-08-24 | 2008-09-23 | International Business Machines Corporation | System for yielding to a processor |
US7152170B2 (en) | 2003-02-20 | 2006-12-19 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Simultaneous multi-threading processor circuits and computer program products configured to operate at different performance levels based on a number of operating threads and methods of operating |
WO2005022385A1 (en) | 2003-08-28 | 2005-03-10 | Mips Technologies, Inc. | Mechanisms for dynamic configuration of virtual processor resources |
US20050050305A1 (en) | 2003-08-28 | 2005-03-03 | Kissell Kevin D. | Integrated mechanism for suspension and deallocation of computational threads of execution in a processor |
-
2004
- 2004-09-30 US US10/954,988 patent/US7711931B2/en active Active
Patent Citations (99)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4860190A (en) * | 1985-09-03 | 1989-08-22 | Fujitsu Limited | Computer system for controlling virtual machines |
US4817051A (en) * | 1987-07-02 | 1989-03-28 | Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation | Expandable multi-port random access memory |
US5159686A (en) * | 1988-02-29 | 1992-10-27 | Convex Computer Corporation | Multi-processor computer system having process-independent communication register addressing |
US5428754A (en) * | 1988-03-23 | 1995-06-27 | 3Dlabs Ltd | Computer system with clock shared between processors executing separate instruction streams |
US5499349A (en) * | 1989-05-26 | 1996-03-12 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Pipelined processor with fork, join, and start instructions using tokens to indicate the next instruction for each of multiple threads of execution |
US5295265A (en) * | 1991-06-04 | 1994-03-15 | Sextant Avionique | Device for enhancing the performance of a real time executive kernel associated with a multiprocessor structure that can include a large number of processors |
US5511192A (en) * | 1991-11-30 | 1996-04-23 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Method and apparatus for managing thread private data in a parallel processing computer |
US5515538A (en) * | 1992-05-29 | 1996-05-07 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Apparatus and method for interrupt handling in a multi-threaded operating system kernel |
US5659786A (en) * | 1992-10-19 | 1997-08-19 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for dynamically performing resource reconfiguration in a logically partitioned data processing system |
US5758142A (en) * | 1994-05-31 | 1998-05-26 | Digital Equipment Corporation | Trainable apparatus for predicting instruction outcomes in pipelined processors |
US5961584A (en) * | 1994-12-09 | 1999-10-05 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson | System for managing internal execution threads |
US6128720A (en) * | 1994-12-29 | 2000-10-03 | International Business Machines Corporation | Distributed processing array with component processors performing customized interpretation of instructions |
US5812811A (en) * | 1995-02-03 | 1998-09-22 | International Business Machines Corporation | Executing speculative parallel instructions threads with forking and inter-thread communication |
US5867704A (en) * | 1995-02-24 | 1999-02-02 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Multiprocessor system shaving processor based idle state detection and method of executing tasks in such a multiprocessor system |
US5727203A (en) * | 1995-03-31 | 1998-03-10 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for managing a database in a distributed object operating environment using persistent and transient cache |
US5799188A (en) * | 1995-12-15 | 1998-08-25 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for managing variable weight thread contexts in a multithreaded computer system |
US5835748A (en) * | 1995-12-19 | 1998-11-10 | Intel Corporation | Method for executing different sets of instructions that cause a processor to perform different data type operations on different physical registers files that logically appear to software as a single aliased register file |
US5892934A (en) * | 1996-04-02 | 1999-04-06 | Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | Microprocessor configured to detect a branch to a DSP routine and to direct a DSP to execute said routine |
US5944816A (en) * | 1996-05-17 | 1999-08-31 | Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | Microprocessor configured to execute multiple threads including interrupt service routines |
US5933627A (en) * | 1996-07-01 | 1999-08-03 | Sun Microsystems | Thread switch on blocked load or store using instruction thread field |
US20020147760A1 (en) * | 1996-07-12 | 2002-10-10 | Nec Corporation | Multi-processor system executing a plurality of threads simultaneously and an execution method therefor |
US5949994A (en) * | 1997-02-12 | 1999-09-07 | The Dow Chemical Company | Dedicated context-cycling computer with timed context |
US6175916B1 (en) * | 1997-05-06 | 2001-01-16 | Microsoft Corporation | Common-thread inter-process function calls invoked by jumps to invalid addresses |
US6240531B1 (en) * | 1997-09-30 | 2001-05-29 | Networks Associates Inc. | System and method for computer operating system protection |
US6697935B1 (en) * | 1997-10-23 | 2004-02-24 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for selecting thread switch events in a multithreaded processor |
US6061710A (en) * | 1997-10-29 | 2000-05-09 | International Business Machines Corporation | Multithreaded processor incorporating a thread latch register for interrupt service new pending threads |
US6088787A (en) * | 1998-03-30 | 2000-07-11 | Celestica International Inc. | Enhanced program counter stack for multi-tasking central processing unit |
US6330661B1 (en) * | 1998-04-28 | 2001-12-11 | Nec Corporation | Reducing inherited logical to physical register mapping information between tasks in multithread system using register group identifier |
US6189093B1 (en) * | 1998-07-21 | 2001-02-13 | Lsi Logic Corporation | System for initiating exception routine in response to memory access exception by storing exception information and exception bit within architectured register |
US6253306B1 (en) * | 1998-07-29 | 2001-06-26 | Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | Prefetch instruction mechanism for processor |
US6920634B1 (en) * | 1998-08-03 | 2005-07-19 | International Business Machines Corporation | Detecting and causing unsafe latent accesses to a resource in multi-threaded programs |
US6223228B1 (en) * | 1998-09-17 | 2001-04-24 | Bull Hn Information Systems Inc. | Apparatus for synchronizing multiple processors in a data processing system |
US6286027B1 (en) * | 1998-11-30 | 2001-09-04 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Two step thread creation with register renaming |
US6205543B1 (en) * | 1998-12-03 | 2001-03-20 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Efficient handling of a large register file for context switching |
US7020879B1 (en) * | 1998-12-16 | 2006-03-28 | Mips Technologies, Inc. | Interrupt and exception handling for multi-streaming digital processors |
US6401155B1 (en) * | 1998-12-22 | 2002-06-04 | Philips Electronics North America Corporation | Interrupt/software-controlled thread processing |
US7069421B1 (en) * | 1999-01-28 | 2006-06-27 | Ati Technologies, Srl | Side tables annotating an instruction stream |
US6330656B1 (en) * | 1999-03-31 | 2001-12-11 | International Business Machines Corporation | PCI slot control apparatus with dynamic configuration for partitioned systems |
US20020174318A1 (en) * | 1999-04-09 | 2002-11-21 | Dave Stuttard | Parallel data processing apparatus |
US6687812B1 (en) * | 1999-04-20 | 2004-02-03 | Nec Corporation | Parallel processing apparatus |
US7185185B2 (en) * | 1999-05-11 | 2007-02-27 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Multiple-thread processor with in-pipeline, thread selectable storage |
US6675192B2 (en) * | 1999-10-01 | 2004-01-06 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Temporary halting of thread execution until monitoring of armed events to memory location identified in working registers |
US6738796B1 (en) * | 1999-10-08 | 2004-05-18 | Globespanvirata, Inc. | Optimization of memory requirements for multi-threaded operating systems |
US6889319B1 (en) * | 1999-12-09 | 2005-05-03 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus for entering and exiting multiple threads within a multithreaded processor |
US20020083173A1 (en) * | 2000-02-08 | 2002-06-27 | Enrique Musoll | Method and apparatus for optimizing selection of available contexts for packet processing in multi-stream packet processing |
US6986140B2 (en) * | 2000-02-17 | 2006-01-10 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method for determining idle processor load balancing in a multiple processors system |
US6668308B2 (en) * | 2000-06-10 | 2003-12-23 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Scalable architecture based on single-chip multiprocessing |
US6591379B1 (en) * | 2000-06-23 | 2003-07-08 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and system for injecting an exception to recover unsaved data |
US7065094B2 (en) * | 2000-07-05 | 2006-06-20 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Method and device in a coupling node for a telecommunication system |
US20020083278A1 (en) * | 2000-12-22 | 2002-06-27 | Bull Hn Information Systems Inc. | Method and data processing system for performing atomic multiple word writes |
US20020091915A1 (en) * | 2001-01-11 | 2002-07-11 | Parady Bodo K. | Load prediction and thread identification in a multithreaded microprocessor |
US20020103847A1 (en) * | 2001-02-01 | 2002-08-01 | Hanan Potash | Efficient mechanism for inter-thread communication within a multi-threaded computer system |
US6643759B2 (en) * | 2001-03-30 | 2003-11-04 | Mips Technologies, Inc. | Mechanism to extend computer memory protection schemes |
US6671791B1 (en) * | 2001-06-15 | 2003-12-30 | Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | Processor including a translation unit for selectively translating virtual addresses of different sizes using a plurality of paging tables and mapping mechanisms |
US20030014471A1 (en) * | 2001-07-12 | 2003-01-16 | Nec Corporation | Multi-thread execution method and parallel processor system |
US7134124B2 (en) * | 2001-07-12 | 2006-11-07 | Nec Corporation | Thread ending method and device and parallel processor system |
US7185183B1 (en) * | 2001-08-02 | 2007-02-27 | Mips Technologies, Inc. | Atomic update of CPO state |
US7181600B1 (en) * | 2001-08-02 | 2007-02-20 | Mips Technologies, Inc. | Read-only access to CPO registers |
US6779065B2 (en) * | 2001-08-31 | 2004-08-17 | Intel Corporation | Mechanism for interrupt handling in computer systems that support concurrent execution of multiple threads |
US20030074545A1 (en) * | 2001-10-12 | 2003-04-17 | Uhler G. Michael | Method and apparatus for binding shadow registers to vectored interrupts |
US6877083B2 (en) * | 2001-10-16 | 2005-04-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | Address mapping mechanism for behavioral memory enablement within a data processing system |
US20030079094A1 (en) * | 2001-10-19 | 2003-04-24 | Ravi Rajwar | Concurrent execution of critical sections by eliding ownership of locks |
US20030093652A1 (en) * | 2001-11-14 | 2003-05-15 | Song Seungyoon Peter | Operand file using pointers and reference counters and a method of use |
US7428732B2 (en) * | 2001-12-05 | 2008-09-23 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus for controlling access to shared resources in an environment with multiple logical processors |
US20030105796A1 (en) * | 2001-12-05 | 2003-06-05 | Sandri Jason G. | Method and apparatus for controlling access to shared resources in an environment with multiple logical processors |
US20030115245A1 (en) * | 2001-12-17 | 2003-06-19 | Kunimasa Fujisawa | Multi-application execution system and method thereof |
US7127561B2 (en) * | 2001-12-31 | 2006-10-24 | Intel Corporation | Coherency techniques for suspending execution of a thread until a specified memory access occurs |
US20030126416A1 (en) * | 2001-12-31 | 2003-07-03 | Marr Deborah T. | Suspending execution of a thread in a multi-threaded processor |
US6925550B2 (en) * | 2002-01-02 | 2005-08-02 | Intel Corporation | Speculative scheduling of instructions with source operand validity bit and rescheduling upon carried over destination operand invalid bit detection |
US7216338B2 (en) * | 2002-02-20 | 2007-05-08 | Microsoft Corporation | Conformance execution of non-deterministic specifications for components |
US6922745B2 (en) * | 2002-05-02 | 2005-07-26 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus for handling locks |
US20040015684A1 (en) * | 2002-05-30 | 2004-01-22 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method, apparatus and computer program product for scheduling multiple threads for a processor |
US20030225816A1 (en) * | 2002-06-03 | 2003-12-04 | Morrow Michael W. | Architecture to support multiple concurrent threads of execution on an arm-compatible processor |
US6971103B2 (en) * | 2002-10-15 | 2005-11-29 | Sandbridge Technologies, Inc. | Inter-thread communications using shared interrupt register |
US7073042B2 (en) * | 2002-12-12 | 2006-07-04 | Intel Corporation | Reclaiming existing fields in address translation data structures to extend control over memory accesses |
US7203823B2 (en) * | 2003-01-09 | 2007-04-10 | Sony Corporation | Partial and start-over threads in embedded real-time kernel |
US20040139306A1 (en) * | 2003-01-09 | 2004-07-15 | Sony Corporation | Partial and start-over threads in embedded real-time kernel |
US7093106B2 (en) * | 2003-04-23 | 2006-08-15 | International Business Machines Corporation | Register rename array with individual thread bits set upon allocation and cleared upon instruction completion |
US20050251639A1 (en) * | 2003-08-28 | 2005-11-10 | Mips Technologies, Inc. A Delaware Corporation | Smart memory based synchronization controller for a multi-threaded multiprocessor SoC |
US20070106990A1 (en) * | 2003-08-28 | 2007-05-10 | Mips Technologies, Inc. | Symmetric multiprocessor operating system for execution on non-independent lightweight thread contexts |
US20060195683A1 (en) * | 2003-08-28 | 2006-08-31 | Mips Technologies, Inc. | Symmetric multiprocessor operating system for execution on non-independent lightweight thread contexts |
US20060190946A1 (en) * | 2003-08-28 | 2006-08-24 | Mips Technologies, Inc. | Symmetric multiprocessor operating system for execution on non-independent lightweight thread context |
US20070044106A2 (en) * | 2003-08-28 | 2007-02-22 | Mips Technologies, Inc. | Symmetric multiprocessor operating system for execution on non-independent lightweight thread contexts |
US20070043935A2 (en) * | 2003-08-28 | 2007-02-22 | Mips Technologies, Inc. | Symmetric multiprocessor operating system for execution on non-independent lightweight thread contexts |
US20070044105A2 (en) * | 2003-08-28 | 2007-02-22 | Mips Technologies, Inc. | Symmetric multiprocessor operating system for execution on non-independent lightweight thread contexts |
US20060190945A1 (en) * | 2003-08-28 | 2006-08-24 | Mips Technologies, Inc. | Symmetric multiprocessor operating system for execution on non-independent lightweight thread context |
US20060161421A1 (en) * | 2003-08-28 | 2006-07-20 | Mips Technologies, Inc. | Software emulation of directed exceptions in a multithreading processor |
US20060161921A1 (en) * | 2003-08-28 | 2006-07-20 | Mips Technologies, Inc. | Preemptive multitasking employing software emulation of directed exceptions in a multithreading processor |
US20050251613A1 (en) * | 2003-08-28 | 2005-11-10 | Mips Technologies, Inc., A Delaware Corporation | Synchronized storage providing multiple synchronization semantics |
US7424599B2 (en) * | 2003-08-28 | 2008-09-09 | Mips Technologies, Inc. | Apparatus, method, and instruction for software management of multiple computational contexts in a multithreaded microprocessor |
US20070106988A1 (en) * | 2003-08-28 | 2007-05-10 | Mips Technologies, Inc. | Symmetric multiprocessor operating system for execution on non-independent lightweight thread contexts |
US20070106887A1 (en) * | 2003-08-28 | 2007-05-10 | Mips Technologies, Inc. | Symmetric multiprocessor operating system for execution on non-independent lightweight thread contexts |
US20070106989A1 (en) * | 2003-08-28 | 2007-05-10 | Mips Technologies, Inc. | Symmetric multiprocessor operating system for execution on non-independent lightweight thread contexts |
US7321965B2 (en) * | 2003-08-28 | 2008-01-22 | Mips Technologies, Inc. | Integrated mechanism for suspension and deallocation of computational threads of execution in a processor |
US7376954B2 (en) * | 2003-08-28 | 2008-05-20 | Mips Technologies, Inc. | Mechanisms for assuring quality of service for programs executing on a multithreaded processor |
US20080140998A1 (en) * | 2003-08-28 | 2008-06-12 | Mips Technologies, Inc. | Integrated mechanism for suspension and deallocation of computational threads of execution in a processor |
US6993598B2 (en) * | 2003-10-09 | 2006-01-31 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for efficient sharing of DMA resource |
US20060206686A1 (en) * | 2005-03-08 | 2006-09-14 | Mips Technologies, Inc. | Three-tiered translation lookaside buffer hierarchy in a multithreading microprocessor |
US7386636B2 (en) * | 2005-08-19 | 2008-06-10 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for communicating command parameters between a processor and a memory flow controller |
Cited By (59)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8145884B2 (en) | 2003-08-28 | 2012-03-27 | Mips Technologies, Inc. | Apparatus, method and instruction for initiation of concurrent instruction streams in a multithreading microprocessor |
US20050125629A1 (en) * | 2003-08-28 | 2005-06-09 | Mips Technologies, Inc. | Mechanisms for dynamic configuration of virtual processor resources |
US20050251639A1 (en) * | 2003-08-28 | 2005-11-10 | Mips Technologies, Inc. A Delaware Corporation | Smart memory based synchronization controller for a multi-threaded multiprocessor SoC |
US20060161421A1 (en) * | 2003-08-28 | 2006-07-20 | Mips Technologies, Inc. | Software emulation of directed exceptions in a multithreading processor |
US20060190946A1 (en) * | 2003-08-28 | 2006-08-24 | Mips Technologies, Inc. | Symmetric multiprocessor operating system for execution on non-independent lightweight thread context |
US20060190945A1 (en) * | 2003-08-28 | 2006-08-24 | Mips Technologies, Inc. | Symmetric multiprocessor operating system for execution on non-independent lightweight thread context |
US20070044105A2 (en) * | 2003-08-28 | 2007-02-22 | Mips Technologies, Inc. | Symmetric multiprocessor operating system for execution on non-independent lightweight thread contexts |
US20070044106A2 (en) * | 2003-08-28 | 2007-02-22 | Mips Technologies, Inc. | Symmetric multiprocessor operating system for execution on non-independent lightweight thread contexts |
US20070106989A1 (en) * | 2003-08-28 | 2007-05-10 | Mips Technologies, Inc. | Symmetric multiprocessor operating system for execution on non-independent lightweight thread contexts |
US20070106887A1 (en) * | 2003-08-28 | 2007-05-10 | Mips Technologies, Inc. | Symmetric multiprocessor operating system for execution on non-independent lightweight thread contexts |
US20070106988A1 (en) * | 2003-08-28 | 2007-05-10 | Mips Technologies, Inc. | Symmetric multiprocessor operating system for execution on non-independent lightweight thread contexts |
US20080140998A1 (en) * | 2003-08-28 | 2008-06-12 | Mips Technologies, Inc. | Integrated mechanism for suspension and deallocation of computational threads of execution in a processor |
US7418585B2 (en) | 2003-08-28 | 2008-08-26 | Mips Technologies, Inc. | Symmetric multiprocessor operating system for execution on non-independent lightweight thread contexts |
US7594089B2 (en) | 2003-08-28 | 2009-09-22 | Mips Technologies, Inc. | Smart memory based synchronization controller for a multi-threaded multiprocessor SoC |
US7610473B2 (en) | 2003-08-28 | 2009-10-27 | Mips Technologies, Inc. | Apparatus, method, and instruction for initiation of concurrent instruction streams in a multithreading microprocessor |
US7676664B2 (en) | 2003-08-28 | 2010-03-09 | Mips Technologies, Inc. | Symmetric multiprocessor operating system for execution on non-independent lightweight thread contexts |
US7676660B2 (en) | 2003-08-28 | 2010-03-09 | Mips Technologies, Inc. | System, method, and computer program product for conditionally suspending issuing instructions of a thread |
US7694304B2 (en) | 2003-08-28 | 2010-04-06 | Mips Technologies, Inc. | Mechanisms for dynamic configuration of virtual processor resources |
US7725697B2 (en) | 2003-08-28 | 2010-05-25 | Mips Technologies, Inc. | Symmetric multiprocessor operating system for execution on non-independent lightweight thread contexts |
US7725689B2 (en) | 2003-08-28 | 2010-05-25 | Mips Technologies, Inc. | Symmetric multiprocessor operating system for execution on non-independent lightweight thread contexts |
US7730291B2 (en) | 2003-08-28 | 2010-06-01 | Mips Technologies, Inc. | Symmetric multiprocessor operating system for execution on non-independent lightweight thread contexts |
US7836450B2 (en) | 2003-08-28 | 2010-11-16 | Mips Technologies, Inc. | Symmetric multiprocessor operating system for execution on non-independent lightweight thread contexts |
US9032404B2 (en) | 2003-08-28 | 2015-05-12 | Mips Technologies, Inc. | Preemptive multitasking employing software emulation of directed exceptions in a multithreading processor |
US7849297B2 (en) | 2003-08-28 | 2010-12-07 | Mips Technologies, Inc. | Software emulation of directed exceptions in a multithreading processor |
US7870553B2 (en) | 2003-08-28 | 2011-01-11 | Mips Technologies, Inc. | Symmetric multiprocessor operating system for execution on non-independent lightweight thread contexts |
US20050120194A1 (en) * | 2003-08-28 | 2005-06-02 | Mips Technologies, Inc. | Apparatus, method, and instruction for initiation of concurrent instruction streams in a multithreading microprocessor |
US8266620B2 (en) | 2003-08-28 | 2012-09-11 | Mips Technologies, Inc. | Symmetric multiprocessor operating system for execution on non-independent lightweight thread contexts |
US8516484B2 (en) | 2008-02-01 | 2013-08-20 | International Business Machines Corporation | Wake-and-go mechanism for a data processing system |
US8452947B2 (en) | 2008-02-01 | 2013-05-28 | International Business Machines Corporation | Hardware wake-and-go mechanism and content addressable memory with instruction pre-fetch look-ahead to detect programming idioms |
US20100293341A1 (en) * | 2008-02-01 | 2010-11-18 | Arimilli Ravi K | Wake-and-Go Mechanism with Exclusive System Bus Response |
US8145849B2 (en) | 2008-02-01 | 2012-03-27 | International Business Machines Corporation | Wake-and-go mechanism with system bus response |
US8880853B2 (en) | 2008-02-01 | 2014-11-04 | International Business Machines Corporation | CAM-based wake-and-go snooping engine for waking a thread put to sleep for spinning on a target address lock |
US8171476B2 (en) | 2008-02-01 | 2012-05-01 | International Business Machines Corporation | Wake-and-go mechanism with prioritization of threads |
US8225120B2 (en) | 2008-02-01 | 2012-07-17 | International Business Machines Corporation | Wake-and-go mechanism with data exclusivity |
US8788795B2 (en) | 2008-02-01 | 2014-07-22 | International Business Machines Corporation | Programming idiom accelerator to examine pre-fetched instruction streams for multiple processors |
US8250396B2 (en) | 2008-02-01 | 2012-08-21 | International Business Machines Corporation | Hardware wake-and-go mechanism for a data processing system |
US8015379B2 (en) | 2008-02-01 | 2011-09-06 | International Business Machines Corporation | Wake-and-go mechanism with exclusive system bus response |
US8312458B2 (en) | 2008-02-01 | 2012-11-13 | International Business Machines Corporation | Central repository for wake-and-go mechanism |
US8316218B2 (en) | 2008-02-01 | 2012-11-20 | International Business Machines Corporation | Look-ahead wake-and-go engine with speculative execution |
US8341635B2 (en) | 2008-02-01 | 2012-12-25 | International Business Machines Corporation | Hardware wake-and-go mechanism with look-ahead polling |
US8386822B2 (en) | 2008-02-01 | 2013-02-26 | International Business Machines Corporation | Wake-and-go mechanism with data monitoring |
US8732683B2 (en) | 2008-02-01 | 2014-05-20 | International Business Machines Corporation | Compiler providing idiom to idiom accelerator |
US8127080B2 (en) | 2008-02-01 | 2012-02-28 | International Business Machines Corporation | Wake-and-go mechanism with system address bus transaction master |
US8725992B2 (en) | 2008-02-01 | 2014-05-13 | International Business Machines Corporation | Programming language exposing idiom calls to a programming idiom accelerator |
US8612977B2 (en) | 2008-02-01 | 2013-12-17 | International Business Machines Corporation | Wake-and-go mechanism with software save of thread state |
US8640141B2 (en) | 2008-02-01 | 2014-01-28 | International Business Machines Corporation | Wake-and-go mechanism with hardware private array |
US8640142B2 (en) | 2008-02-01 | 2014-01-28 | International Business Machines Corporation | Wake-and-go mechanism with dynamic allocation in hardware private array |
US20110113220A1 (en) * | 2008-06-19 | 2011-05-12 | Hiroyuki Morishita | Multiprocessor |
US8433884B2 (en) | 2008-06-19 | 2013-04-30 | Panasonic Corporation | Multiprocessor |
US11782859B2 (en) | 2008-11-10 | 2023-10-10 | Micron Technology, Inc. | Methods and systems for devices with self-selecting bus decoder |
US12197363B2 (en) | 2008-11-10 | 2025-01-14 | Micron Technology, Inc. | Methods and systems for pattern recognition processing |
US8230201B2 (en) | 2009-04-16 | 2012-07-24 | International Business Machines Corporation | Migrating sleeping and waking threads between wake-and-go mechanisms in a multiple processor data processing system |
US8082315B2 (en) | 2009-04-16 | 2011-12-20 | International Business Machines Corporation | Programming idiom accelerator for remote update |
US8886919B2 (en) | 2009-04-16 | 2014-11-11 | International Business Machines Corporation | Remote update programming idiom accelerator with allocated processor resources |
US8145723B2 (en) | 2009-04-16 | 2012-03-27 | International Business Machines Corporation | Complex remote update programming idiom accelerator |
US20140281909A1 (en) * | 2013-03-14 | 2014-09-18 | Thoughtwire Holdings Corp. | Method and system for generating a view |
US9742843B2 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2017-08-22 | Thoughtwire Holdings Corp. | Method and system for enabling data sharing between software systems |
US10372442B2 (en) * | 2013-03-14 | 2019-08-06 | Thoughtwire Holdings Corp. | Method and system for generating a view incorporating semantically resolved data values |
US9417882B2 (en) | 2013-12-23 | 2016-08-16 | International Business Machines Corporation | Load synchronization with streaming thread cohorts |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US7711931B2 (en) | 2010-05-04 |
US20050251613A1 (en) | 2005-11-10 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7711931B2 (en) | Synchronized storage providing multiple synchronization semantics | |
US7594089B2 (en) | Smart memory based synchronization controller for a multi-threaded multiprocessor SoC | |
EP3449357B1 (en) | Scheduler for out-of-order block isa processors | |
CN108027766B (en) | Prefetch instruction block | |
CN108027771B (en) | Block-based processor core composition register | |
TWI476595B (en) | Registering a user-handler in hardware for transactional memory event handling | |
US7584332B2 (en) | Computer systems with lightweight multi-threaded architectures | |
CN107003837B (en) | Lightweight constrained transactional memory for speculative compiler optimization | |
US9069605B2 (en) | Mechanism to schedule threads on OS-sequestered sequencers without operating system intervention | |
US8423750B2 (en) | Hardware assist thread for increasing code parallelism | |
TWI448897B (en) | Method and apparatus for monitoring memory access in hardware,a processor and a system therefor | |
US7870553B2 (en) | Symmetric multiprocessor operating system for execution on non-independent lightweight thread contexts | |
WO2003003196A2 (en) | A multithreaded processor capable of implicit multithreaded execution of a single-thread program | |
EP2641171B1 (en) | Preventing unintended loss of transactional data in hardware transactional memory systems | |
JP2001236221A (en) | Pipe line parallel processor using multi-thread | |
JP2011028774A (en) | Transaction-based shared data operation in multiprocessor environment | |
US20090164758A1 (en) | System and Method for Performing Locked Operations | |
US20170371659A1 (en) | Load-store queue for block-based processor | |
WO2000075771A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for enforcing memory reference dependencies through a load store unit | |
CN111752477A (en) | Techniques for providing memory atomicity with low overhead | |
US20090063881A1 (en) | Low-overhead/power-saving processor synchronization mechanism, and applications thereof | |
WO2001065367A2 (en) | Supporting inter-process communication through a conditional trap instruction | |
Kawano et al. | Fine-grain multi-thread processor architecture for massively parallel processing | |
Ceze et al. | Are we ready for high memorylevel parallelism? | |
Li et al. | Lightweight chip multi-threading (LCMT): Maximizing fine-grained parallelism on-chip |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: MIPS TECHNOLOGIES, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:KISSELL, KEVIN D.;PARALOGOS S.A.R.L.;REEL/FRAME:015736/0752 Effective date: 20050122 Owner name: MIPS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,CALIFORNIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:KISSELL, KEVIN D.;PARALOGOS S.A.R.L.;REEL/FRAME:015736/0752 Effective date: 20050122 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: JEFFERIES FINANCE LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT, NEW YO Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:MIPS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.;REEL/FRAME:019744/0001 Effective date: 20070824 Owner name: JEFFERIES FINANCE LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT,NEW YOR Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:MIPS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.;REEL/FRAME:019744/0001 Effective date: 20070824 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: MIPS TECHNOLOGIES, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:JEFFERIES FINANCE LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:021985/0015 Effective date: 20081205 Owner name: MIPS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,CALIFORNIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:JEFFERIES FINANCE LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:021985/0015 Effective date: 20081205 |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
CC | Certificate of correction | ||
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: IMAGINATION TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, CALIFORNIA Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:MIPS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.;REEL/FRAME:042375/0221 Effective date: 20140310 |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 8TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1552) Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: HELLOSOFT LIMITED, UNITED KINGDOM Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:IMAGINATION TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED;REEL/FRAME:046588/0985 Effective date: 20171006 Owner name: MIPS TECH LIMITED, UNITED KINGDOM Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:HELLOSOFT LIMITED;REEL/FRAME:046589/0282 Effective date: 20171108 Owner name: MIPS TECH, LLC, CALIFORNIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MIPS TECH LIMITED;REEL/FRAME:046589/0726 Effective date: 20180216 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: WAVE COMPUTING LIQUIDATING TRUST, CALIFORNIA Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:WAVE COMPUTING, INC.;MIPS TECH, LLC;MIPS TECH, INC.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:055429/0532 Effective date: 20210226 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: CAPITAL FINANCE ADMINISTRATION, LLC, ILLINOIS Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:MIPS TECH, LLC;WAVE COMPUTING, INC.;REEL/FRAME:056558/0903 Effective date: 20210611 Owner name: MIPS TECH, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:WAVE COMPUTING LIQUIDATING TRUST;REEL/FRAME:056589/0606 Effective date: 20210611 Owner name: HELLOSOFT, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:WAVE COMPUTING LIQUIDATING TRUST;REEL/FRAME:056589/0606 Effective date: 20210611 Owner name: WAVE COMPUTING (UK) LIMITED, CALIFORNIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:WAVE COMPUTING LIQUIDATING TRUST;REEL/FRAME:056589/0606 Effective date: 20210611 Owner name: IMAGINATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:WAVE COMPUTING LIQUIDATING TRUST;REEL/FRAME:056589/0606 Effective date: 20210611 Owner name: CAUSTIC GRAPHICS, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:WAVE COMPUTING LIQUIDATING TRUST;REEL/FRAME:056589/0606 Effective date: 20210611 Owner name: MIPS TECH, LLC, CALIFORNIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:WAVE COMPUTING LIQUIDATING TRUST;REEL/FRAME:056589/0606 Effective date: 20210611 Owner name: WAVE COMPUTING, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:WAVE COMPUTING LIQUIDATING TRUST;REEL/FRAME:056589/0606 Effective date: 20210611 |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 12TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1553); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: WAVE COMPUTING INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:CAPITAL FINANCE ADMINISTRATION, LLC, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:062251/0251 Effective date: 20221229 Owner name: MIPS TECH, LLC, CALIFORNIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:CAPITAL FINANCE ADMINISTRATION, LLC, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:062251/0251 Effective date: 20221229 |