JP7585550B1 - Apparatus and method for displaying key performance indicator tree - Google Patents

Abstract

[Problem] Visualize key performance indicators from various structural perspectives.
[Solution] The key performance indicator tree display device 1 has a key performance indicator tree database 11 having a tree structure of an organization and a tree structure of issues, an indicator selection unit 12 that displays the tree structure of an organization and the tree structure of issues in the key performance indicator tree database 11 and accepts a user's selection of multiple indicators from among the organizations and issues, a compilation unit 13 that collects performance information related to the multiple indicators, a graph selection unit 14 that accepts a selection of a graph type showing the performance information, and a graph visualization unit 15 that visualizes the performance information compiled by the compilation unit 13 in a graph of the type accepted by the graph selection unit 14.
[Selected Figure] Figure 1

Description

The present invention relates to a key performance indicator tree display device and a key performance indicator tree display method.

In recent years, there has been a demand for visualization of key performance indicators (KPIs) in companies and other organizations, which allows the current status of the organization to be understood at a glance.
Patent Document 1 describes an invention that allows an operator to configure a required dashboard display without understanding a graphic programming application.

JP 2023-029859 A

An organization is structured as a tree. Furthermore, issues to be analyzed in an organization such as a company are also structured as a tree, from influence to cause. It is desirable to visualize key performance indicators related to these organizations or issues from various structural perspectives.
Therefore, an object of the present invention is to visualize key performance indicators from various structural perspectives.

In order to solve the above-mentioned problems, the key performance indicator tree display device of the present invention is characterized by having a key performance indicator tree database having a tree structure of an organization and a tree structure of an issue, an indicator selection unit that displays the tree structure of the organization and the tree structure of the issue in the key performance indicator tree database and accepts a user's selection of multiple indicators from among the organization and the issue, an aggregation unit that aggregates performance information related to the multiple indicators, a graph selection unit that accepts a selection of a type of graph showing the performance information, and a graph visualization unit that visualizes the performance information aggregated by the aggregation unit in a graph of the type accepted by the graph selection unit.

In other words, the key performance indicator tree display method of the present invention is characterized by having a step in which an indicator selection unit displays a tree structure of organizations and a tree structure of issues in a key performance indicator tree database and accepts a user's selection of multiple indicators from the organizations and issues, a step in which a compilation unit collects performance information related to the multiple indicators, a step in which a graph selection unit accepts a selection of a type of graph showing the performance information, and a step in which a graph visualization unit visualizes the performance information compiled by the compilation unit in the type of graph accepted by the graph selection unit.

Other means will be described in the description of the invention.

The present invention makes it possible to visualize key performance indicators from various structural perspectives.

1 is a logical configuration diagram of a key performance indicator tree display device according to an embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 2 is a hardware configuration diagram of a key performance indicator tree display device. FIG. 13 is a diagram illustrating a tree structure from effects to causes. FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating a tree structure of an organization. FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating an example of an organization structure. FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating an example of the configuration of a facility group. FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating an example of a configuration of a work group. 13 is a flowchart of a graph display process based on a key performance indicator tree. 13 is a flowchart of a process for updating information in a key performance indicator tree database. FIG. 13 is a diagram illustrating a tree structure relating to productivity. FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating an organizational tree structure relating to process manufacturing efficiency. FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating a tree structure of an organization related to cycle time. FIG. 13 is a diagram illustrating a tree structure relating to quality. FIG. 13 is a diagram illustrating a tree structure of an organization relating to the number of defective products, the defective product rate, and the defective product cost. FIG. 13 is a diagram illustrating an organizational tree structure relating to the number, rate, and amount of defects of subcontractors. FIG. 13 is a diagram for explaining an organizational tree structure relating to supplier defect numbers, rates, and amounts. FIG. 13 is a diagram illustrating a tree structure relating to deliverability. FIG. 13 is a diagram illustrating a tree structure of an organization related to deliverability. FIG. 13 is a diagram illustrating a tree structure of an organization relating to a subcontractor delivery compliance rate. FIG. 13 is a diagram for explaining a tree structure of an organization relating to a supplier delivery compliance rate. FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating a tree structure related to facility resources. FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating a tree structure of an organization relating to equipment operation efficiency. FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating a tree structure of an organization relating to equipment failure occurrence and impact. FIG. 13 is a diagram illustrating a tree structure of an organization related to facility maintenance action levels. FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating a tree structure of an organization related to equipment maintenance effectiveness. FIG. 13 is a diagram illustrating a tree structure of an organization relating to facility maintenance costs. FIG. 13 is a diagram illustrating a tree structure relating to inventory. FIG. 13 is a diagram illustrating a tree structure of an organization relating to inventory adequacy and inventory disposal costs. 1 is a pane showing aggregated information based on a selected metric. 1 is a pane showing aggregated information based on selected metrics. FIG. 13 is a diagram showing major categories and contents of KPI indicators. This is the screen where you select and visualize key performance indicators. This is the screen where you enter search criteria and the search results are displayed. 13 is a KPI dashboard setting screen. 13 is a KPI component setting screen. 13 is a setting example of a KPI component setting screen. 13 is a setting example of a KPI component setting screen. This is a graph screen that visualizes information compiled based on selected indicators. A dashboard that displays a pane that displays a graph and a pane that displays a histogram that is linked to the graph.

Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings.
FIG. 1 is a logical configuration diagram of a key performance indicator tree display device 1 according to this embodiment.
The key performance indicator tree display device 1 includes a key performance indicator tree database 11, an indicator selection unit 12, a compilation unit 13, a graph selection unit 14, a graph visualization unit 15, a display control unit 16, a size selection unit 17, and an information update unit 18. This key performance indicator tree display device 1 visualizes key performance indicators from various structural viewpoints.

The key performance indicator tree database 11 is a database having a tree structure of tasks as shown in FIG. 3, which will be described later, and a tree structure of organizations as shown in FIG.
The indicator selection unit 12 accepts a user's selection of multiple indicators from among those displayed in the organization tree structure and the task tree structure stored in the key performance indicator tree database 11 .

The tallying unit 13 tallys up performance information relating to the multiple indexes selected by the user by the index selecting unit 12. The graph selecting unit 14 accepts the selection of a type of graph showing the performance information tallied by the tallying unit 13.
The graph visualization unit 15 visualizes the performance information collected by the collection unit 13 in a graph of the type accepted by the graph selection unit 14 .

The display control unit 16 causes the graph created by the graph visualization unit 15 to be displayed on the display unit 104 in FIG.
The size selection unit 17 selects the display size of the graph created by the graph visualization unit 15 .
When information about the task is input, the information update unit 18 registers it in the information of the key performance indicator tree database 11 and updates the information in the upper hierarchy.

FIG. 2 is a hardware configuration diagram of the key performance indicator tree display device 1. As shown in FIG.
The key performance indicator tree display device 1 is configured to include hardware such as a CPU 105 , a ROM 106 , a RAM 107 , an input unit 108 , a communication unit 109 , a display unit 104 , and a storage unit 100 .

The CPU 105 is a central processing unit that provides overall control over this key performance indicator tree display device 1, and embodies each of the functional units shown in FIG. 1 by executing a key performance indicator tree display program 101 stored in the memory unit 100 described below.
The ROM 106 is a non-volatile readable memory and stores, for example, a BIOS (Basic I/O System), etc. The RAM 107 is a volatile readable/writable memory and is used by the CPU 105 as a temporary storage area for programs.

The input unit 108 is, for example, a keyboard, a mouse, a touch panel, etc., and is used to input information. The communication unit 109 is, for example, a network interface card (NIC), and transmits and receives information to and from other devices via the Internet.
The storage unit 100 is, for example, an SSD (Solid State Drive), and stores a key performance indicator tree display program 101 and the like.

FIG. 3 is a diagram for explaining a tree structure from effects to causes.
Here, part of the tree structure related to productivity is displayed. At the level one level below productivity are the indicators of process manufacturing efficiency and personnel productivity. At the level one level below process manufacturing efficiency are the indicators of process productivity and cycle time. At the level one level below personnel productivity is the indicator of direct personnel efficiency. The lower the level an indicator is, the closer it is to the cause. Indicators at higher levels are affected by indicators at lower levels. Users can understand the overall impact by looking at the indicators at higher levels. Users can understand the factors that affect the impact by looking at the indicators at even lower levels.

FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating an organization tree structure.
This organization shows the tree structure of a factory. At the top of the hierarchy is the factory manager, and below him are departments, processes, and equipment. The lower you go, the deeper the information you can dig up.

FIG. 5 is a diagram for explaining an example of an organization structure.
Factory 2 is made up of work areas 21 and 22. Work area 21 is made up of work areas 211 and 212. Work area 211 is made up of processes 213 and 214. Process 213 is made up of equipment groups 215 and 216. Process 214 is made up of work groups 217 and 218. The factory, work area, and work area are management units of the organization that evaluate the responsibility of the person in charge. A process is a unit that evaluates the flow of work. An equipment group is a lineup of equipment that performs the same work. A work group is a lineup of workers that perform the same work.

It is assumed that process 213 is made up of work by equipment group 215 and work by equipment group 216. Equipment group 215 selects equipment from equipment 2151 to 2153 that performs the same work, and performs production.
If equipment 2151 is included in the equipment performing operations of equipment group 215, the two operations of process 213 may be performed in a flow from equipment 2151 to equipment 2151, but even though they are the same equipment, they are treated as separate production resources in terms of the process flow.

From a maintenance perspective, it is advisable to treat the facility 2151 as unique.
FIG. 6 is a diagram for explaining an example of the configuration of the facility group 215. As shown in FIG.
The facility group 215 is configured to include facilities 2151, 2152, and 2153. The facility hierarchy is the lowest level of the organization tree structure.

FIG. 7 is a diagram for explaining an example of the configuration of the work group 217. As shown in FIG.
The work group 217 includes worker combinations 2171, 2172, and 2173. The hierarchy of the worker combination is the lowest level of the tree structure of the organization.

FIG. 8 is a flowchart of a graph display process based on a key performance indicator tree.
The indicator selection unit 12 accepts the selection of multiple indicators from the tree structure of the organization and the tree structure of the issues (step S10). The aggregation unit 13 aggregates performance information related to the selected multiple indicators (step S11). The graph visualization unit 15 draws a graph of the performance information related to the selected indicators (step S12).

The graph selection unit 14 determines whether the setting button of the graph pane has been clicked (step S13). If the setting button has not been clicked (No), the process returns to step S13. If the setting button has been clicked (Yes), the process proceeds to step S14.

When the graph selection unit 14 accepts a change in the graph type setting in step S14, the process returns to step S11, where new performance information is compiled and the graph is redrawn.
FIG. 9 is a flowchart of the process of updating information in the key performance indicator tree database 11 .

The information update unit 18 receives information input for the lowest level of the tree structure (step S20), and registers the information in the corresponding level of the key performance indicator tree database 11 (step S21).
Next, the information update unit 18 judges whether the layer being processed is the top layer (step S22). If the layer being processed is the top layer (Yes), the process in Fig. 9 ends. If the layer being processed is not the top layer (No), the process proceeds to step S23.

In step S23, the information update unit 18 processes the next higher hierarchical level. The information update unit 18 then updates the information of the hierarchical level to be processed based on the information of the hierarchical level below that was last updated (step S24), and the process returns to step S22.

FIG. 10A is a diagram for explaining a tree structure 111 relating to productivity.
A tree structure 111 is information related to productivity. Indicators of process manufacturing efficiency, personnel productivity, and inter-process efficiency belong to productivity at one level below.
At the next level below process manufacturing efficiency are the indicators of process productivity and cycle time.

At the next level below process productivity are the indicators of downtime rate, downtime loss time, and value utilization rate. Downtime rate is the percentage of time when there is no production plan, and is calculated by dividing downtime by operating time. Downtime loss rate is the percentage of time when no goods were being made during the production plan, and is calculated by dividing downtime loss time by load time.

The breakdown downtime loss time rate is one level below the downtime loss time rate indicator. The breakdown downtime loss time rate is the proportion of equipment downtime during production planning, and is calculated by dividing the breakdown downtime loss time by the load time. The value uptime rate is the proportion of equipment downtime during production planning, and is calculated by dividing the value uptime by the uptime.

The cycle time has the indicators of the CT planned/actual difference rate and the CT variability at the next lower level. The CT planned/actual difference rate is calculated by subtracting the standard CT from the average CT and dividing by the standard CT. The CT variability is the greater of either subtracting the average CT from the maximum CT value and dividing by the average CT, or subtracting the minimum CT value from the average CT and dividing by the average CT.

FIG. 10B is a diagram illustrating an organizational tree structure relating to process manufacturing efficiency.
When the target is the entire factory process, the factory manager aims to grasp the total lost time of the entire factory. The subordinate process to be managed is the work area.
When the target is the total process of a work section, the purpose of the work section manager is to grasp the total lost time of the entire work section. The subordinate process of the management is the work section.

When the target is the total process of the work area, the work area manager aims to grasp the total lost time of the entire work area. The subordinate process of the management is the work area.
The purpose of a process is to grasp the total loss time of the process when the target is the own process. The management sub-processes are the equipment group and the operation group.

When the target is an equipment group, the purpose of the equipment group is to grasp the total loss time of the equipment group. The management sub-process is the equipment.
When the target is equipment, the objective is to grasp the total loss time for each piece of equipment. There are no sub-processes to manage.

When the target is a work group, the purpose is to grasp the total lost time of the work group. The management sub-process is the worker combination pattern.
The purpose of worker combination pattern is to grasp the total loss time for each worker combination pattern when the target is a worker combination pattern. There are no sub-processes to manage.

FIG. 10C is a diagram illustrating a tree structure of an organization related to cycle time.
When the target is the process itself, the purpose of the process is to grasp the accuracy of the process cycle time. The management sub-processes are the equipment group and the operation group.
When the target is an equipment group, the purpose of the equipment group is to grasp the accuracy of the cycle time of the equipment group. The management sub-process is the equipment.

When the target is equipment, the objective is to grasp the accuracy of the cycle time for each piece of equipment. There are no sub-processes to manage.
When the target is a work group, the purpose is to grasp the accuracy of the work group's cycle time. The management sub-process is the worker combination pattern.

The purpose of the worker combination pattern is to understand the accuracy of the cycle time for each worker combination pattern when the target is a worker combination pattern. There are no sub-processes to manage.

FIG. 11A is a diagram for explaining a tree structure 112 relating to quality.
The indicators of defect loss and quality control loss belong to the next level below quality. The indicators of defect loss belong to the next level below number of defective products, defect rate, defect value, number of defective products, rate, value of defective products from subcontractors, and number of defective products, rate, value of defective products from suppliers.

The number of defective products, the rate of defective products, and the amount of defective products belong to the next lower level, as well as the number, rate, and amount of defects that flow to the next process.
The number of defects discharged to the post-process is calculated by dividing the number of defects discharged by the number of products produced. The defect rate is calculated by dividing the number of defects discovered by the number of products produced.

The subcontractor defect number, rate, and amount belong to the indicators of the subcontractor defect number, rate, and amount, and the defect number and rate by subcontractor in the next lower hierarchical level. The supplier defect number, rate, and amount belong to the indicators of the supplier defect number, rate, and amount, and the defect number and rate by supplier in the next lower hierarchical level. The subcontractor defect rate is calculated by dividing the subcontractor defect number by the subcontract purchase quantity. The key performance indicator tree display device 1 should then display the top five subcontractors, the defect number, defect rate, and defect amount.

The supplier defect rate is calculated by dividing the number of supplier defects by the number of supplier deliveries. The key performance indicator tree display device 1 may then display the number of defects, defect rate, and defect amount for the top five suppliers.

FIG. 11B is a diagram for explaining a tree structure of an organization relating to the number of defects, the defect rate, and the defect amount.
When the target is the entire factory process, the factory manager aims to grasp the total evaluation of defects in the entire factory. The subordinate process is the work area.
When the target is the total process of a work area, the purpose of the work manager is to grasp the total evaluation of defects for the entire work area. The subordinate process of management is the work area.

When the target is the total process of the work area, the work area manager aims to grasp the total evaluation of defects of the entire work area. The subordinate process of management is the work area.
When the target is the process itself, the purpose of the process is to grasp the total defect evaluation of the process. The management sub-processes are the equipment group and the operation group.

When the target is an equipment group, the purpose of the equipment group is to grasp the total evaluation of the equipment group. The management sub-process is the equipment.
When the target is equipment, the purpose of the equipment is to grasp the total evaluation of the equipment's defects. There are no sub-processes to manage the equipment.

When the target is a work group, the purpose of the work group is to grasp the total defect evaluation of the work group. The management sub-process is the worker combination pattern.
The purpose of the operator combination pattern is to grasp the total defect evaluation for each operator combination pattern when the target is the operator combination pattern. There are no lower-level processes to manage.

FIG. 11C is a diagram for explaining an organizational tree structure relating to the number, rate, and amount of defects of subcontractors.
When the target is the overall process of the factory, the factory manager aims to grasp the overall evaluation of the subcontractors in the entire factory. The management sub-process is the work area.
When the target is the total process of the work area, the foreman aims to grasp the total evaluation of the subcontractors for the entire work area. The management sub-process is the work area.

When the target is the total process of the work area, the work area manager aims to grasp the total evaluation of the subcontractors for the entire work area. There are no sub-processes under its management.

FIG. 11D is a diagram for explaining an organizational tree structure relating to supplier defect numbers, rates, and amounts.
When the target is the overall process of the factory, the factory manager aims to grasp the overall evaluation of suppliers in the entire factory. The management sub-process is the work area.
When the target is the overall process of a section, the section manager aims to grasp the overall supplier evaluation of the entire section. There are no sub-processes to manage.

FIG. 12A is a diagram for explaining a tree structure 113 relating to deliverability.
In the level below deliverability, the indicators of production plan compliance rate, subcontractor delivery compliance rate, and supplier delivery compliance rate belong to the hierarchy. The production plan compliance rate is calculated by dividing the number of production plans that are adhered to by the number of productions. In the level below delivery date compliance rate, the indicators of the number of productions that are adhered to and the number of production plans belong to the hierarchy.

The subcontractor delivery compliance rate has indicators for the number of delivery compliance cases and the number of tasks at a lower level. The subcontractor delivery compliance rate is calculated by dividing the number of delivery compliance cases by the number of tasks. The key performance indicator tree display device 1 should display the top five subcontractors and their delivery compliance rates.

The supplier delivery compliance rate has indicators for the number of delivery compliance cases and the number of orders at the next lower level. The supplier delivery compliance rate is calculated by dividing the number of delivery compliance cases by the number of orders. The key performance indicator tree display device 1 should display the five worst suppliers and their delivery compliance rates.

FIG. 12B is a diagram illustrating a tree structure of an organization related to deliverability.
When the target is the entire factory process, the factory manager aims to grasp the delivery date compliance evaluation of the entire factory. There are no subordinate processes to manage.

FIG. 12C is a diagram illustrating a tree structure of an organization relating to the subcontractor delivery compliance rate.
When the target is the entire factory process, the factory manager aims to grasp the subcontractor delivery compliance rate for the entire factory. The subordinate process under management is the work area.
When the target is the total process of a work area, the project manager aims to grasp the subcontractor delivery compliance rate of the entire work area. The subordinate process of the management is the work area.

When the target is the total process of the work area, the work area manager aims to grasp the subcontractor delivery compliance rate of the entire work area. There are no sub-processes under its management.
FIG. 12D is a diagram for explaining a tree structure of an organization relating to supplier delivery compliance rates.
When the target is the overall process of the factory, the factory manager aims to grasp the overall evaluation of suppliers in the entire factory. The management sub-process is the work area.

When the target is the overall process of a section, the section manager aims to grasp the overall supplier evaluation of the entire section. There are no sub-processes to manage.
FIG. 13A is a diagram for explaining a tree structure 114 relating to facility resources.
The equipment resources category includes, at the next lower level, the indicators of equipment operation efficiency, equipment failure occurrence and impact, equipment maintenance action level, equipment maintenance effectiveness, and equipment maintenance cost.

The indicators one level below equipment operating efficiency are overall equipment utilization efficiency, equipment load factor, time availability factor, equipment operation rate, and equipment readiness rate.
The overall equipment utilization efficiency is calculated by multiplying the equipment load factor by the overall equipment efficiency or by dividing the value operating hours by the operating hours.

The equipment load factor is calculated by dividing the load time by the operating time, or by subtracting the downtime from the operating time and dividing the result by the operating time.
The availability rate is calculated by subtracting the downtime loss time from the load time and dividing the result by the load time, or by dividing the operation time by the load time.

Capacity utilization is calculated by dividing value hours by operating hours.
Equipment availability is calculated by dividing value operating hours by load hours.
The following indicators belong to the level below the equipment failure occurrence and impact: number of equipment failures and downtime, failure frequency rate, failure severity rate, and mean time between failures (MTBF). The failure frequency rate is calculated by dividing the number of equipment failures by the load time (target: 0.10% or less). The equipment severity rate is calculated by dividing the equipment failure downtime by the load time (target: 0.15% or less). The mean time between failures (MTBF) is calculated by dividing the load time by the number of equipment failures.

In the level below the equipment maintenance action level, the indicators of mean time to restore (MTTR) and maintenance action loss belong. In the level below the maintenance action loss, the indicators of maintenance call response loss, maintenance call pending loss, and number of alarms due to delayed maintenance measures belong.

The facility maintenance effectiveness has indices of the rate of planned maintenance effective occurrences, the rate of planned maintenance effective time, and the number of occurrences of shortages of maintenance spare parts at the next lower level.
The rate of effective planned maintenance is calculated by dividing the number of unexpected maintenance by the number of expected maintenance. The rate of effective planned maintenance time is calculated by dividing the unexpected maintenance time by the expected maintenance time.

FIG. 13B is a diagram illustrating a tree structure of an organization relating to equipment operation efficiency.
When the target is the overall factory process, the factory manager aims to display a red alarm if there is any equipment with a red alarm in the equipment operation efficiency of the entire factory, and a yellow alarm if there is a yellow alarm. The subordinate process to be managed is the work area.

The purpose of the construction manager is to display a red alarm if there is any equipment with a red alarm in the equipment operation efficiency of the entire construction area, and a yellow alarm if there is a yellow alarm, when the target is the total construction area process. The subordinate process of the management is the work area.
The work area manager aims to display a red alarm if there is any equipment with a red alarm in the equipment operation efficiency of the entire work area, and a yellow alarm if there is a yellow alarm, when the target is the total process of the work area. The subordinate process of management is the work area.

The purpose of the process is to display a red alarm if there is equipment in the process that has a red alarm for the equipment operation efficiency, and a yellow alarm if there is a yellow alarm for the equipment operation efficiency, when the target is the own process. The lower process of the management is the equipment group.
The purpose of the equipment group is to display a red alarm if the equipment in the equipment group has a red alarm, and a yellow alarm if the equipment in the equipment group has a yellow alarm. The management sub-process is the equipment.

When the target is equipment, the purpose of the equipment is to display a red alarm if the equipment operating efficiency for each piece of equipment has a red alarm, and a yellow alarm if the equipment has a yellow alarm. There are no lower-level processes to manage.

FIG. 13C is a diagram for explaining a tree structure of an organization relating to equipment failure occurrence and impact degree.
When the target is the entire factory process, the factory manager aims to grasp the total occurrence and impact of equipment failures in the entire factory. The subordinate process to be managed is the work area.
When the target is the total process of a work area, the purpose of the work manager is to grasp the total occurrence and impact of equipment failures in the entire work area. The subordinate process of management is the work area.

When the target is the total process of the work area, the work area manager aims to grasp the total occurrence and impact of equipment failures in the entire work area. The subordinate process of management is the work area.
When the target of a process is its own process, the purpose is to grasp the total occurrence and impact of equipment failures in the process. The lower process to be managed is the equipment group.

When the target is an equipment group, the purpose of the equipment group is to grasp the total occurrence and impact of equipment failures in the equipment group. The management sub-process is the equipment.
When the target is equipment, the purpose of the equipment is to grasp the occurrence and impact of equipment failures for each piece of equipment. There are no sub-processes for management.

FIG. 13D is a diagram illustrating an organization tree structure related to the facility maintenance action level.
When the target is the overall factory process, the factory manager aims to grasp the total equipment maintenance action level of the entire factory. The management sub-process is the work area.
When the target is the total process of the work area, the foreman aims to grasp the total equipment maintenance action level of the entire work area. The management sub-process is the work area.

When the target is the total work process, the work area manager aims to grasp the total equipment maintenance action level of the entire work area. The management sub-process is the work area.
When the target is the process itself, the purpose of the process is to grasp the total equipment maintenance action level of the process. The management sub-process is the equipment group.

When the target is a facility group, the objective is to grasp the total facility maintenance action level of the facility group. The management sub-process is the facility.
When the target is equipment, the purpose of the equipment is to grasp the equipment maintenance action level for each piece of equipment. There are no sub-processes for management.

FIG. 13E is a diagram for explaining a tree structure of an organization relating to the equipment maintenance effectiveness.
When the target is the entire factory process, the factory manager aims to grasp the total equipment maintenance effectiveness of the entire factory. The management sub-process is the work area.
When the target is the total process of a work area, the construction manager aims to grasp the total equipment maintenance effectiveness of the entire work area. The management sub-process is the work area.

When the target is the total process of the work area, the work area manager aims to grasp the total equipment maintenance effectiveness of the entire work area. The management sub-process is the work area.
When the target of a process is its own process, the purpose is to grasp the total equipment maintenance effectiveness of the process. The management sub-process is an equipment group.

When the target is an equipment group, the objective is to grasp the total equipment maintenance effectiveness of the equipment group. The management sub-process is the equipment.
When the target is equipment, the purpose is to grasp the equipment maintenance effectiveness for each piece of equipment. There are no sub-processes for management.

FIG. 13F is a diagram illustrating a tree structure of an organization relating to facility maintenance costs.
When the target is the overall factory process, the factory manager aims to grasp the total equipment maintenance cost for the entire factory. The subordinate process to be managed is the work area.
When the target is the total construction schedule of a construction section, the construction manager aims to grasp the total equipment maintenance cost of the entire construction section. The management sub-process is the work section.

When the target is the total work area process, the work area manager aims to grasp the total equipment maintenance cost of the entire work area. The management sub-process is the work area.
When the target is the process itself, the purpose is to grasp the total equipment maintenance cost of the process. The management sub-process is an equipment group.

When the target is an equipment group, the objective is to grasp the total equipment maintenance cost of the equipment group. The management sub-process is the equipment.
When the target is equipment, the objective is to grasp the equipment maintenance cost for each piece of equipment. There are no sub-processes to manage.

FIG. 14A is a diagram illustrating a tree structure 116 relating to inventory.
The inventory indicators at the next lower level are inventory adequacy and inventory disposal value.
The inventory adequacy indicator has the following indicators in the hierarchy: inventory turnover days and inventory value. The inventory turnover days indicator has the following indicators in the hierarchy: average inventory turnover days for components and average inventory turnover days for finished goods.

The average inventory turnover period for parts is calculated by dividing the total inventory amount of parts by the delivered amount of parts.
The average days of inventory turnover of finished goods is calculated by dividing the total inventory of finished goods by the production volume.
The inventory value has indicators for parts inventory value, work-in-progress inventory value, and finished product inventory value in the next lower hierarchical level. Parts inventory value is calculated from the inventory amount of parts. Work-in-progress inventory value is calculated from the inventory amount of work-in-progress products. Finished product inventory value is calculated from the inventory amount of finished products.

The inventory disposal amount has indicators for the amount of parts inventory disposal, the amount of work in progress disposal, and the amount of finished goods inventory disposal in the next lower hierarchical level.
The material inventory disposal cost is calculated from the material inventory disposal amount.
The amount of in-process inventory disposal is calculated from the amount of in-process inventory disposal.
The amount of finished product inventory disposal is calculated based on the amount of finished product inventory disposal.

FIG. 14B is a diagram for explaining an organizational tree structure relating to the inventory adequacy rate and the inventory disposal amount.
When the target is the total factory process, the factory manager aims to grasp the total inventory adequacy level and the total inventory disposal amount for the entire factory. The lower process to be managed is the work area.

When the target is the total process of a work area, the purpose of the work area manager is to grasp the total inventory adequacy rate and the total inventory disposal amount for the entire work area. The management sub-process is the work area.
When the target is the total process of the work area, the work area manager aims to grasp the total inventory adequacy rate and the total inventory disposal amount of the entire work area. The management sub-process is the work area.

When the target is the local process, the purpose of the process is to grasp the total inventory adequacy of the process and the total inventory disposal amount. There are no sub-processes to manage.

FIG. 15 is a pane showing aggregated information based on selected metrics.
This pane 31 visualizes the status of each index when the manufacturing department and a specific index are selected. Here, the status of productivity index, quality index, cash flow index, deliverability index, maintenance index, environmental index, and safety index for the production headquarters are displayed with weather icons.

FIG. 16 is a pane showing aggregated information based on selected metrics.
This pane 32 visualizes the state of each index when a specific index is selected for the first, second, third, or fourth work area. Here, the states of the productivity index, quality index, deliverability index, and maintenance index for the manufacturing department are displayed with weather icons.

FIG. 17 is a diagram showing major KPI index categories and their contents.
In this table, the three columns on the left are major categories of KPI indicators, and the one column on the right is the content.
The index P indicates productivity and includes direct productivity and indirect productivity based on total productive maintenance (TPM). The index Q indicates quality and includes quality assurance cost and quality loss cost.

The index C indicates cost. The index D indicates deliverability, and is configured to include a production plan compliance rate and a delivery date compliance rate. The index M indicates equipment resources and human resources, and is configured to include equipment efficiency and human efficiency.
The index E indicates the environment. The index S indicates safety, and includes accidents and near misses. The index CF indicates inventory, and includes parts and material inventory, work-in-progress inventory, and finished product inventory.

FIG. 18 shows a screen 41 for selecting and visualizing key performance indicators.
The screen 41 includes an indicator selection pane 42 and a dashboard 43. The dashboard 43 displays the name "daily production volume" and includes a graph pane 33, a pane 34, and a graph pane 38. The screen 41 is a screen for selecting and visualizing key performance indicators.

The indicator selection pane 42 includes a reference date menu 421, an analysis target menu 422, an organization tree structure 423, and an issue tree structure 424. The reference date menu 421 is a menu for selecting the reference date for aggregating data. The analysis target menu 422 is a menu for selecting the analysis target.

The organization tree structure 423 is a tree structure of organizations displayed in the index selection pane 42. The organization tree structure 423 is an input component that allows the selection of an organization at any level.
The issue tree structure 424 is a tree structure of issues displayed in the indicator selection pane 42. The issue tree structure 424 is an input component that allows the selection of an issue at any level. Here, the indicators of production volume and number of conforming items are selected.

Graph pane 33, pane 34, and graph pane 38 display information related to the selected daily production volume. Graph pane 33 displays the production volume and number of good products for a specified period of time as a line graph. Pane 34 displays a text box for writing notes on the analysis results of the index data. Graph pane 38 displays the production volume and number of good products for a specified period of time as, for example, a bar graph and a line graph. Clicking on graph pane 38 transitions the display to screen 51 in Figure 19.

FIG. 19 shows a screen 51 for inputting search conditions and displaying the search results.
The screen 51 has, as search conditions, a workplace combo box 511, a process combo box 512, an equipment combo box 513, a part number combo box 514, and a work status combo box 516. The screen 51 further has, as search conditions, a lot number text box 515, a work instruction number text box 519, a work start time period 517, a work end time period 518, a clear button 520, and a search button 521.

The workplace combo box 511 is a combo box for selecting and inputting the workplace to be searched.
The process combo box 512 is a combo box for selecting and inputting a process to be searched for.
The facility combo box 513 is a combo box for selecting and inputting the facility to be searched for.
The part number combo box 514 is a combo box for selecting and inputting the part number to be searched.

The work status combo box 516 is a combo box for selecting and inputting the work status of the search target. The lot number text box 515 is a text box for inputting the lot number of the search target. The work instruction number text box 519 is a text box for inputting the work instruction number of the search target. The work start period 517 and work end period 518 are menus for selecting and inputting the start period and end period of the work to be searched for.

The clear button 520 is a button for initializing the search conditions. The search button 521 is a button for searching for the input search conditions.
On the screen 51, a search result table 53 is displayed as the search result, and further below that, a work hold button 522, a hold release button 523, a performance inquiry button 524, and a facility change button 525 are displayed.

The search result table 53 is a table showing the search results that are updated when the above-mentioned search button 521 is clicked. Each row of the search result table 53 displays each task, and instructions can be given for the selected task by checking the check box on the right side.

The task suspension button 522 is a button for instructing suspension of a task selected in a check box at the right end of the search result table 53 .
The release hold button 523 is a button for releasing the hold of the work that has been instructed to be put on hold by the work hold button 522 .

The performance inquiry button 524 is a button for inquiring about graphs, tables, and analysis results of performance data compiled from the search results. The equipment change button 525 is a button for changing the equipment used in the work related to the search results.

FIG. 20 shows the KPI dashboard setting screen 35 .
The KPI dashboard setting screen 35 is a screen for inputting dashboard settings. The KPI dashboard setting screen 35 includes a dashboard name text box 351, a dashboard type combo box 352, a delete button 353, a register button 354, and a cancel button 355.

The dashboard name text box 351 is a text box for inputting the name of the dashboard to be registered.
The dashboard type combo box 352 is a combo box for selecting the type of dashboard to be registered. The dashboard type combo box 352 displays a menu of selectable dashboard types such as "Grid 1×1", "Grid 2×1", "Grid 2×2", "Grid 2×3", "Grid 3×1", "Grid 3×2", "Grid 3×3", "Grid extension setting", and the like.

When you select "Grid 1x1", the entire dashboard is used as one pane.
When "Grid 2x1" is selected, a pane that divides the dashboard into two rows is used.

When "Grid 2x2" is selected, a pane that divides the dashboard into 2 rows and 2 columns is used.
When "Grid 3x1" is selected, a pane that divides the dashboard into three rows is used.

When "Grid 3x2" is selected, panes that divide the dashboard into 3 rows and 3 columns are used.
When "Grid 3x3" is selected, panes that divide the dashboard into 3 rows and 3 columns are used.

When "Grid Extended Settings" is selected, a setting is used to divide the dashboard into, for example, two rows and link the graphs and the like in these two panes.
The delete button 353 is a button for deleting a registered dashboard. The register button 354 is a button for registering a new dashboard. The cancel button 355 is a button for canceling the input of dashboard settings.

FIG. 21 shows the KPI component setting screen 36 .
The KPI component setting screen 36 includes a component setting field, a graph setting field, and an indicator axis item field.
The component setting field includes a dashboard name text box 361 , a component type combo box 362 , and size combo boxes 363 and 364 .

The dashboard name text box 361 is a text box for inputting the name of the dashboard. The component type combo box 362 is a combo box for selecting and inputting the type of component. The component type combo box 362 makes it possible to select bar graph, bar-time axis graph, line + bar-time axis graph, bar-time axis graph, note, list, target/achievement value, area-continuous time axis graph, pie chart, gauge, horizontal bar graph, etc. When note is selected, it is possible to leave a comment on the indicator. When list is selected, the data is displayed as a list.

Size combo boxes 363 and 364 are combo boxes for determining the size at which the dashboard is used.
The graph setting field includes a left axis label name text box 365, a right axis label name text box 366, and a reference work screen URL (Uniform Resource Locator) text box 367. The left axis label name text box 365 is a text box for inputting a label for the left axis of the graph. The right axis label name text box 366 is a text box for inputting a label for the right axis of the graph. The reference work screen URL text box 367 is a text box for inputting the URL of a reference work screen that can be called up when the graph is clicked.

The reference business screen URL text box 367 is a function for defining the relevant screen in order to link with the business screen that was the source data for the graph display. If the search criteria can be specified by URL, they are selected by graph. It is also possible to encode organizational information and period information in the URL and pass it on.

The indicator axis item is an item for selecting the data to be displayed as an indicator. The indicator axis item includes an indicator axis item combo box 368, a graph setting type combo box 369, an add button 370, an indicator axis item table 373, a register button 371, and a cancel button 372.

The indicator axis item combo box 368 is a combo box for selecting the indicator axis item you want to add. The graph setting type combo box 369 is a combo box for selecting the setting type of the graph you want to add. By selecting the indicator axis item you want to add and the setting type of that graph, the indicator code and graph type are added to the indicator axis item table 373.

The register button 371 registers the updated indicator axis item table 373 in the storage unit 100. The cancel button 372 cancels the registration of the indicator axis item table 373 in the storage unit 100 even if it has been updated.

FIG. 22 shows an example of settings on the KPI component setting screen 36 .
In the KPI component setting screen 36 of Fig. 22, two indicators have been added to the indicator axis item table 373. In the first row, the indicator code is "Number of conforming items." The display axis is 1, and the graph type is "Other." In the second row, the indicator code is "Production volume." The display axis is 1, and the graph type is "Other." When this is registered, the graph pane 33 shown in Fig. 18 is displayed.

FIG. 23 shows an example of settings on the KPI component setting screen 36 .
In the KPI component setting screen 36 in Fig. 23, two indicators have been added to the indicator axis item table 373. In the first row, the indicator code is the number of conforming items, the display axis is 1, and the graph type is a bar graph. In the second row, the indicator code is the number of production units, the display axis is 1, and the graph type is a line graph. When this is registered, the graph pane 33 shown in Fig. 24 is displayed.

FIG. 24 is a graph pane 38 that visualizes aggregated information based on selected metrics.
The graph pane 38 shows the truck production volume and the number of non-defective items in a line graph and a bar graph. The horizontal axis of the graph shows the passage of time. When "Line + Bar - Time Axis Graph" is selected in the component type combo box 362, the graph pane 38 in FIG. 24 is displayed.

FIG. 25 shows a dashboard 46 that displays a pane 391 that displays a graph and a pane 392 that displays a histogram linked to the graph.
This dashboard 46 is displayed when the grid expansion setting is selected in the dashboard type combo box 352 on the KPI dashboard setting screen 35 .

Pane 391 displays a time series graph showing the reduction in the CT planned-actual difference rate. Pane 392 displays a histogram for the same period as the time series graph displayed in pane 391. In this way, the key performance indicator tree display device 1 can display a time series graph of an indicator and a histogram of the same indicator in conjunction with each other.

[1]
A key performance indicator tree database (11) having an organization tree structure and a task tree structure;
an indicator selection unit (12) that displays a tree structure of the organization and a tree structure of the task in the key performance indicator tree database (11) and accepts a user's selection of multiple indicators from among the organization and the task;
A compilation unit (13) that compiles performance information related to the plurality of indexes;
a graph selection unit (14) that accepts a selection of a type of graph showing the performance information;
a graph visualization unit (15) that visualizes the performance information collected by the collection unit (13) in a graph of a type accepted by the graph selection unit (14);
13. A key performance indicator tree display device comprising:

This makes it possible to visualize key performance indicators from a variety of structural perspectives.

[2]
2. The key performance indicator tree display device according to claim 1, wherein the indicator selection unit (12) displays tasks at any level in the tree structure of the tasks in the key performance indicator tree database (11) in a manner that allows the user to select the tasks.

This allows you to select issues at any level in the tree structure of issues in the key performance indicator tree database.

[3]
2. The key performance indicator tree display device according to claim 1, wherein the indicator selection unit (12) displays an organization at any level in the tree structure of the organizations in the key performance indicator tree database (11) in a manner that allows the user to select the organization.

This allows you to select an organization at any level in the organizational tree structure of the key performance indicator tree database.

[4]
The method further includes a display control unit (16) that displays the graph created by the graph visualization unit (15) on a display unit (104).
2. The key performance indicator tree display system according to claim 1 .

This allows you to display a graph of information at a desired level in the tree structure.

[5]
Further comprising a size selection unit that selects a display size of the graph created by the graph visualization unit (15).
2. The key performance indicator tree display system according to claim 1 .

This allows you to display a graph of the information at the desired level in the tree structure at the desired size.

[6]
and an information updating unit (18) for registering information on the task in the key performance indicator tree database (11) and updating information on a higher level when the information on the task is input.
2. The key performance indicator tree display system according to claim 1 .

This allows users to simply input the lowest level of information in the tree structure of the key performance indicator tree database, and update the information in higher levels to match it.

[7]
an indicator selection unit (12) displays a tree structure of organizations and a tree structure of issues in the key performance indicator tree database (11) and accepts a user's selection of multiple indicators from among the organizations and issues;
A step in which a compilation unit (13) compiles performance information related to the plurality of indexes;
A graph selection unit (14) receives a selection of a type of graph showing the performance information;
A step in which a graph visualization unit (15) visualizes the performance information collected by the collection unit (13) in a graph of the type accepted by the graph selection unit (14);
13. A method for displaying a key performance indicator tree comprising:

This makes it possible to visualize key performance indicators from a variety of structural perspectives.

<<Variation>>
The present invention is not limited to the above-described embodiment, and includes various modified examples. For example, the above-described embodiment has been described in detail to clearly explain the present invention, and is not necessarily limited to those having all of the configurations described. It is possible to replace a part of the configuration of one embodiment with the configuration of another embodiment, and it is also possible to add the configuration of another embodiment to the configuration of one embodiment. In addition, it is also possible to add, delete, or replace a part of the configuration of each embodiment with another configuration.

The above configurations, functions, processing units, processing means, etc. may be realized in part or in whole by hardware such as an integrated circuit. The above configurations, functions, etc. may be realized by software by a processor interpreting and executing a program that realizes each function. Information such as the programs, tables, and files that realize each function can be stored in a recording device such as a memory, a hard disk, or an SSD (Solid State Drive), or on a recording medium such as a flash memory card or a DVD (Digital Versatile Disk).

In each embodiment, the control lines and information lines are those that are considered necessary for the explanation, and not all control lines and information lines in the product are necessarily shown. In reality, it can be considered that almost all components are interconnected.

REFERENCE SIGNS LIST 1 Key performance indicator tree display device 11 Key performance indicator tree database 12 Index selection unit 13 Counting unit 14 Graph selection unit 15 Graph visualization unit 16 Display control unit 17 Size selection unit 18 Information update unit 104 Display unit 105 CPU
106 ROM
107 RAM
108 Input section 109 Communication section 100 Memory section 101 Key performance indicator tree display program 2 Factory 213, 214 Process 215, 216 Equipment group 217, 218 Work group 2151 to 2153 Equipment 2171 to 2173 Worker combination 111 to 116 Tree structure 31 Pane 32 Pane 41 Screen 42 Indicator selection pane 43 Dashboard 33 Graph pane 34 Pane 38 Graph pane 421 Reference date menu 422 Analysis target menu 423 Organization tree structure 424 Issue tree structure 51 Screen 511 Workplace combo box 512 Process combo box 513 Equipment combo box 514 Part number combo box 516 Work status combo box 515 Lot number text box 519 Work instruction number text box 517 Work start period 518 Work end period 520 Clear button 521 Search button 53 Search result table 522 Hold work button 523 Release hold button 524 Inquire performance button 525 Change equipment button 35 KPI dashboard setting screen 351 Dashboard name text box 352 Dashboard type combo box 353 Delete button 354 Register button 355 Cancel button 36 KPI component setting screen 361 Dashboard name text box 362 Component type combo boxes 363, 364 Size combo box 365 Left axis label name text box 366 Right axis label name text box 367 Reference work screen URL text box 368 Indicator axis item combo box 369 Graph setting type combo box 370 Add button 373 Indicator axis item table 371 Register button 372 Cancel button

Claims (7)

A key performance indicator tree database having an organization tree structure and an issue tree structure;
an indicator selection unit that displays a tree structure of the organization and a tree structure of the task in the key performance indicator tree database and receives a user's selection of a plurality of indicators from among the organization and the task;
A counting unit that counts performance information related to the plurality of indexes;
a graph selection unit that accepts a selection of a type of graph showing the performance information;
a graph visualization unit that visualizes the performance information collected by the collection unit in a graph of a type accepted by the graph selection unit;
13. A key performance indicator tree display device comprising: 2. The key performance indicator tree display device according to claim 1, wherein the indicator selection unit displays tasks at any level in the tree structure of the tasks in the key performance indicator tree database in a manner that allows the user to select the tasks. 2. The key performance indicator tree display device according to claim 1, wherein the indicator selection unit displays an organization at any level in the tree structure of the organization in the key performance indicator tree database in a manner that allows the user to select the organization. A display control unit that displays the graph created by the graph visualization unit on a display unit.
2. The key performance indicator tree display system according to claim 1 . A size selection unit that selects a display size of the graph created by the graph visualization unit.
2. The key performance indicator tree display system according to claim 1 . an information updating unit that, when information on the problem is input, registers the information in the key performance indicator tree database and updates information in a higher hierarchy;
2. The key performance indicator tree display system according to claim 1 . an indicator selection unit displays a tree structure of organizations and a tree structure of issues in the key performance indicator tree database, and receives a user's selection of multiple indicators from among the organizations and issues;
A step in which a compilation unit compiles performance information related to the plurality of indexes;
a graph selection unit receiving a selection of a type of graph showing the performance information;
a graph visualization unit visualizing the performance information compiled by the compilation unit in a graph of the type accepted by the graph selection unit;
13. A method for displaying a key performance indicator tree comprising:

Images