JP4840272B2 - Optical disk device - Google Patents

Description

  The present invention relates to an optical disc apparatus that moves and copies data to an optical disc.

  In a conventional optical disk recording apparatus, if data is recorded on a poor optical disk, stable recording cannot be performed. Therefore, before recording an optical disk (hereinafter simply referred to as a disk), it is determined whether the disk is a bad disk.

  As shown in FIG. 1A, some poor discs have a center hole 102 that is shifted from the center with respect to the center 101 of the disc 100 (hereinafter referred to as an eccentric disc). Further, as shown in FIGS. 1B and 1C, there is a disk whose outer periphery is warped with respect to the inner periphery of the disk. There are also disks having both of these aspects.

  When data is recorded on a poor disk, there are cases where pits cannot be formed properly on the optical disk even if the data is recorded on all the tracks by tracking control (referred to as tracking servo control). . In such a case, even if some pit shape is not appropriate, it can be corrected by an error correction technique.

  On the other hand, there is a copy-once disc in which copying is restricted to one time from the viewpoint of copyright. Once such a disk is copied to a hard disk or the like, it cannot be copied to the optical disk for the second time but can only be moved. Therefore, when the data recording to the grandchild disk is completed, it is considered that the data has been properly recorded, and the original data is deleted.

Patent Document 1 discloses a data processing device that notifies a user of a recording quality result or the like when data is moved from a first storage device to a second storage device.
JP-A-2005-353180

  However, if the error in reading data on the disk exceeds a certain limit, error correction cannot be performed and a reading error may occur. In particular, problems have arisen when moving data to an optical disk. In other words, even when data cannot be properly recorded on the optical disk, the optical disk apparatus sometimes erases the original data. Then, in particular, when moving the contents of the copy-once disc to the hard disk and then moving to the optical disc, if the optical disc cannot be read after the content is moved, the moved content cannot be used completely. was there.

  In view of such problems, an object of the present invention is to provide a disk device that can more reliably determine a bad disk and reliably move or copy a data.

  The disk device of the present invention has the following configuration in order to solve the above problems.

(1) A PU (Pick-Up) head that irradiates an optical disk set in the optical disk apparatus main body with laser light to record data on the optical disk or read data recorded on the optical disk;
In an optical disc apparatus comprising: a data processing unit that encodes a data format to be recorded on the optical disc,
Using the PU head, based on the intensity of the laser beam reflected by the optical disc, the outer shape quality judging means for judging the degree of distortion of the optical disc;
A recording parameter storage unit for storing recording parameters when recording data on individual optical discs;
OPC (Optimum Write Power Control) for measuring the recording power of the laser beam that is optimal for recording data on the optical disk by performing test recording on a part of the optical disk using the PU head. OPC means for performing in the first region and the second region outside the first region,
In any of the following (A) to (C):
(A) As a result of reading the optical disc using the optical disc unit, when the recording parameter corresponding to the disc is not stored in the recording parameter storage unit,
(B) When the outer shape quality determination means determines that the degree of distortion of the optical disk exceeds a predetermined range,
(C) When the optimum recording power of the optical disc measured by the OPC means has a difference between values in the first and second areas exceeding a predetermined threshold value,
In any of the cases, there is provided disc determination means for determining that the optical disc is a poor optical disc.

  In this configuration, in the cases (A) to (C), it is determined that the optical disk is a bad optical disk (an optical disk that is highly likely not to be recorded normally). In (A), when a recording parameter corresponding to the disc is not stored in the recording parameter storage unit, for example, a disc on which a manufacturer ID (identification) that does not correspond to the write strategy stored in the optical disc apparatus is recorded. Are determined to be bad disks. When such a determination is made, there is no write strategy corresponding to the optical disc set in the apparatus, so there is a high possibility that pits cannot be formed appropriately. Therefore, in this case, it is determined that the disk is a bad disk.

  (B) If the degree of distortion of the optical disk (for example, eccentricity in the direction parallel to the disk, warpage in the direction perpendicular to the disk, surface deflection, etc.) exceeds a predetermined range, the strategy is appropriate. However, even if tracking servo control cannot be performed or tracking servo control can be performed, there is a high possibility that pits cannot be formed properly because the accuracy or reliability of tracking the track decreases. Therefore, such a disk is determined to be a bad disk.

  In (C), when the OPC unit measures the optimum recording power of the optical disc in the first and second areas, and the difference between the measured values exceeds a predetermined threshold, the actual recording is performed. There is a high possibility that the optimum conditions of the above are different from the optimum values obtained by performing the OPC. Therefore, such a disk is determined to be a bad disk.

  Since the determination is made as in (A) to (C), it is possible to more reliably determine a bad disk.

  (2) When the disc determination unit determines that the optical disc is a poor optical disc, the disc determination unit includes a notification unit that notifies the fact.

  Since it is informed that the disc is a bad disc, the user can prevent problems such as being unable to read data by mistakenly recording on the optical disc.

(3) The outer shape quality determining means determines the degree of distortion of the optical disc at positions P1 to Pn (n is an integer) moved stepwise from the outer circumference of the disc to determine the degree of distortion of the optical disc. Search for a position Pk (k is any one of 1 to n) within the predetermined range,
The OPC means moves the first area for performing the OPC stepwise from the outside to the inside so that the difference between the values in the first and second areas falls within the threshold value. Explore the region of
The disc determination means detects a recordable area of the optical disc based on the first area searched by the outline quality determination means and the position Pk searched by the OPC means.

  In this way, it is not simply determined that the entire disk is a bad disk, but an area that can be recorded is detected more precisely, so that the entire disk does not have to be wasted.

(4) When the optical disk device is instructed to record data on the optical disk,
The data processing unit compresses the data so that the data instructed to be recorded falls within a recordable area of the optical disc detected by the disc determination unit.

  In this configuration, since the data instructed to be recorded is compressed and recorded so as to fit in the recordable area, the entire disk need not be wasted.

  (5) The outer shape quality determination means determines the amount of vertical and horizontal deviation from the track of the optical disk based on the intensity of the laser light emitted by the PU head, and based on the amount of deviation, the optical disk Tracking servo control for following the track may be performed, and the degree of distortion of the optical disk may be determined based on the shift amount during the control.

  (6) The outer shape quality determination means may determine the degree of distortion of the optical disk based on the result of measuring the number of tracks that have passed through the irradiation position of the PU head.

  According to the present invention, it is possible to determine before recording whether or not the disk is a bad disk that is highly likely not to be recorded normally.

  Hereinafter, an optical disk apparatus according to an embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to FIG.

  FIG. 2 is a block diagram showing a part of the configuration of the optical disc apparatus 1 according to the first embodiment. The optical disc apparatus 1 includes a spindle motor 2, a pickup head 3 (hereinafter referred to as "PU head 3"), an RF signal amplifier circuit 40, a TE / FE generator 41, a drive circuit 42, a wobble detection circuit 5, and a recording. / A reproduction processing circuit 6, a laser power control circuit 62, a laser drive circuit 63, a decoder 65, and a control unit 7 are provided.

  The disc 100 is an optical disc, such as a CD or DVD. The spindle motor 2 rotates the disk 100.

  The PU head 3 includes a pickup lens 30, a laser diode 31, a beam splitter 32, a photodetector 33, a collimator lens (not shown), and the like, similarly to a known optical disk device, and irradiates the disk 100 with laser light and reflects the reflected light. To detect.

  Further, the PU head 3 includes two actuators 34. That is, a focusing actuator for moving the focal point of the laser beam irradiated on the DVD 100 in the optical axis direction and a tracking actuator for moving the laser beam in the radial direction of the DVD 100 are provided.

  The beam splitter 32 separates the light emitted from the laser diode 31 and the light reflected by the DVD 100. The photodetector 33 can be composed of, for example, a light receiving element divided into four. The photodetector 33 determines the reflected light from the DVD 100. The collimator lens converts light emitted from the laser diode 31 that is a point light source into parallel light.

  The operation of the PU head 3 is as follows. That is, the laser diode 31 outputs laser light with a predetermined intensity by driving the laser driving circuit 63. The laser light passes through the collimator lens, is reflected by the beam splitter 32, and is collected on the DVD 100 surface by the pickup lens 30. The laser light is reflected by the DVD 100, and the reflected light is determined by the four photodetectors 33. The photodetectors 33 each output a determination signal.

  The RF signal amplifier circuit 40 amplifies the RF signal obtained by fully adding the four determination signals detected by the photodetector 33. This RF signal is used to read data on the DVD 100.

  The TE / FE generator 41 generates a tracking error signal TE and a focus error signal FE based on the signal output from the optical photodetector 33, and outputs TE and FE to the drive circuit 42. Here, TE and FE are error signals representing errors in the horizontal and vertical directions with respect to the track position. The drive circuit 42 generates a drive signal for driving the actuator 34 based on TE and FE. The actuator 34 inputs a drive signal and moves the lens 30. With these actions, the laser beam can follow the track of the disk 100 and the lens 30 can be focused on the surface of the disk 100.

  Here, the tracking error signal TE is an error signal indicating the amount of deviation between the center of the disk track and the irradiation position of the laser light emitted from the pickup head, and indicates the amount of deviation in the horizontal direction with respect to the disk 100. Yes. The focus error signal FE is an error signal indicating the amount of deviation between the recording surface of the disc and the condensing position of the laser light emitted from the pickup head, and indicates the amount of deviation in the direction perpendicular to the disc 100.

  For the generation of the tracking error signal TE and the focus error signal FE by the TE / FE generator 41, a known method may be used. For example, the focus error signal can be calculated by the calculation of FE = (A + C) − (B + D), with the four determination signals of the photodetector 33 being A, B, C, and D clockwise.

  Note that the photodetector 33 is not necessarily divided into four parts, and it is sufficient that the amplitude of the deviation amount in the horizontal direction and the vertical direction of the disk 100 can be obtained when the disk 100 is rotated. For example, when the three-beam method is used to determine the tracking error, the sub-beam is irradiated on both sides of the disk 100 in the track direction, so the photodetector 33 may be divided into three light receiving portions. When the push-pull method is used, the photodetector 33 may be divided into two light receiving surfaces.

  The wobble detection circuit 5 receives the differential signal input determined by the photodetector 33 of the PU head 3 and extracts the wobble signal. The wobble detection circuit 5 outputs a wobble signal to the recording / reproduction processing circuit 6. Here, the wobble has a meandering shape provided in the guide groove of the DVD 100, and the wobble signal indicates a recording position when data is recorded on the disc. The wobble signal generates a recording clock and is used to control the rotational speed of the disc. As the wobble detection circuit 5, a known circuit configuration for wobble determination may be used, and description thereof is omitted here. In addition to wobble, there are LPP (Land Pre-Pit) and the like as a method for controlling the rotational speed of the disc and the position where data is recorded. The method is not limited to wobble as long as it can control the rotational speed of the disc and the position where data is recorded.

  The recording / reproducing processing circuit 6 detects a change in reflectance due to a recording track on the data recording surface of the DVD 100 from the RF signal. At the time of reproduction, the recording / reproduction processing circuit 6 binarizes the data output from the RF signal amplification circuit 40 according to the presence / absence of a recording track on the DVD 100. Thereby, the data recorded on the DVD 100 is read. As this reproduction circuit, a general circuit configuration for data reproduction may be used. The recording / playback processing circuit 6 includes an OSD circuit that outputs an OSD (On-Screen Display) of a character or an image instructed by the control unit 7 to the display 105, and displays the status of various optical disk devices 1. .

  The laser power control circuit 62 controls the intensity of the laser. The laser drive circuit 63 outputs a drive current to the laser diode 31. At the time of data recording on the DVD 100, the laser drive circuit 63 controls the output current of the laser drive circuit 63 so as to give a laser intensity signal necessary for data recording and erasing to the laser diode 31. At the time of reading, the laser drive circuit 63 controls the output current of the laser drive circuit 63 so as to give the laser diode 31 a signal that is weaker than the recording intensity. The decoder 65 decodes the RF signal processed by the recording / reproduction processing circuit 6 into a reproduction signal. In addition, a video signal is output to the display unit 105 through a D / A converter (not shown). However, when outputting a video signal to a display device having a digital input / output terminal, it is not necessary to pass a D / A converter.

  The HD 66 (hard disk) is a storage device. The HDD 67 drives the HD 66 to record and read data. For example, when dubbing HD66 data to the disk 100, the HD66 data is read, the circuits 6, 62, 63 process the read data, and the PU head 3 records the HD66 data on the disk 100.

  The control unit 7 includes a microcomputer (including a CPU, RAM, ROM, etc.) or a system IC including the microcomputer, and performs various controls and signal processing. The control unit 7 controls each unit of the optical disc apparatus 1 such as the drive unit of the spindle motor 2, the laser power control circuit 62, the RF signal amplification circuit 40, the TE / FE generation unit 41, and the wobble detection circuit 5. The ROM in the control unit 7 stores a subroutine for executing various processes 70 to 74. The control unit 7 calls and executes these programs. The bad disk determination process 70 is a process for determining whether the disk 100 set in the apparatus 1 is a bad disk using the sub-processes of the processes 71 to 73. Details of the processes 70 to 74 will be described later.

  The operation unit 79 includes a remote controller and a remote controller light receiving unit or an operator, and receives an input for operating the control unit 7 from a user.

  The tray 8 includes a drive unit (not shown), and receives / instructs the control unit 7 to load / unload the disk 100 into / from the apparatus 1.

  The display 105 and the speaker 106 are external to the optical disc apparatus 1, and output video and audio based on the video signal generated by the recording / playback processing circuit 6. The speaker 106 may be attached to the display device 105.

  In the description of FIG. 2 described above, the blocks are separated for each function. However, any one of these functions may be configured as a system IC in which a plurality of functions are integrated. However, one block may be divided into a plurality of blocks.

  Hereinafter, the processes 70 to 74 will be described with reference to FIGS.

  An example of the data format of the strategy 75 will be described with reference to FIG. As shown in FIG. 3, the ROM of the control unit 7 stores a plurality of sets of data associated with the manufacturer ID, the recording power, and the recording pulse width. Since the manufacturer ID is recorded on the disc 100, the control unit 7 can obtain the recording power and the recording pulse width corresponding to the disc 100 via the manufacturer ID recorded on the disc 100.

The flow of the strategy confirmation process 71 will be described with reference to FIG.
In ST1, the manufacturer ID of the disk 100 is read from the disk 100. For example, if the disc 100 is a DVD-R or the like, it is recorded in the lead-in area.
In ST2, a strategy 75 corresponding to the manufacturer ID is searched from the ROM in the control unit 7.

  The ROM of the control unit 7 corresponds to the “recording parameter storage unit” of the present invention. As long as the strategy 75 can be continuously stored even when the power is off, the “recording parameter storage unit” may be directly or indirectly accessible by the control unit 7 even if it is not inside the control unit 7. .

  In ST3, when the result searched in ST2 exists (YES in ST3), the control unit 7 determines that the strategy 75 corresponding to the manufacturer ID exists. When the search result exists (YES in ST3), the control unit 7 determines that the strategy 75 corresponding to the manufacturer ID exists. If there is no search result (NO in ST3), the process moves to ST5. In ST5, the control unit 7 determines that there is no strategy 75 corresponding to the manufacturer ID. After ST4 and ST5, the flow of FIG. 4 ends.

  Next, the outline quality determination processing 72 will be described with reference to the flowcharts of FIGS. 5 and 6 show Example 1 and Example 2 of the outer shape quality determination processing 72.

  5, in ST11, in ST11, the spindle motor 2 rotates the disk 100, and a thread motor (not shown) moves the PU head 3 to a predetermined radial position (for example, the outermost position where the deflection is relatively large). Let In ST12, a tracking servo control for controlling the PU head 3 to follow the track on the disk 100 is tried. In this control, an RF signal amplification circuit 40, an FE / TE generation unit 41, and a drive circuit 42 are used.

  In ST13, it is determined whether the tracking control performed in ST12 is possible. If this control is possible (YES in ST13), the process moves to ST14. If this control is not possible (NO in ST13), it is determined in ST17 that the degree of eccentricity or warpage exceeds a predetermined range. Thereafter, the flow of FIG. 5 ends.

  In ST14, the fluctuation width of the TE signal and the FE signal at the time of servo control (hereinafter, these or a value calculated based on them is collectively referred to as a servo fluctuation amount) is detected. Here, the fluctuation width of the TE signal represents the fluctuation width in the direction parallel to the disk 100. Therefore, based on the fluctuation width of the TE signal, it is possible to determine whether the disk is an eccentric gravity center disk (a disk in which the center hole 102 is shifted from the center 101 of the disk 100) as shown in FIG. Further, the direction of the amplitude of the FE signal is a direction perpendicular to the disk 100. Therefore, this deflection width represents a surface shake or a warp as shown in FIG.

  The disc eccentricity, surface runout, warpage, and the like that can be detected by the above servo shake amount are collectively referred to as optical disc distortion. These correspond to “distortion of the optical disk” of the present invention. The same applies to the second embodiment, but in the second embodiment, a shake in a direction parallel to the disk 100 can be mainly detected.

  In ST15, it is determined whether the servo shake amount determined in ST14 is within a threshold value. This determination may be made, for example, by separately setting a threshold value for each of the fluctuation widths of the TE signal and the FE signal at the time of servo control, or by comparing these values with those obtained by calculating such products. Good. Further, it is only necessary to be able to compare by comparing the fluctuation width of the TE signal and the FE signal with some threshold value.

  If the servo shake amount is within the threshold value in ST15 (YES in ST15), it is determined in ST16 that the degree of eccentricity or warpage is within a predetermined range. If it exceeds the threshold (NO in ST15), it is determined in ST17 that the degree of eccentricity or warpage exceeds a predetermined range.

  Regarding Example 2 of FIG. 6, in ST21, a thread motor (not shown) moves the PU head 3 to a predetermined radial position (for example, the position of the outermost periphery where the deflection is relatively large). In ST22, the laser diode 31 starts irradiating the disk 100 with laser at the position where the PU head 3 is stopped. In ST23, the spindle motor 2 rotates the disk 100.

  Note that the order of ST21 to ST23 may be any order, or may be simultaneous.

  In ST24, in a state where the disk 100 is rotating, the control unit 7 counts the number of track crossing pulses determined when crossing the track of the disk 100. Since the output voltage of the photodetector 33 fluctuates when traversing the track, it is possible to generate a pulse by separating the fluctuation of the output of the photodetector 33 into high and low at a predetermined threshold. For example, the track crossing pulse may be generated by the recording / reproducing processing circuit 6 that converts the output voltage of the RF signal amplification circuit 40 into a pulse. Alternatively, a circuit for generating a pulse by separating the fluctuation of the output of the photodetector 33 into high and low at a predetermined threshold may be provided.

  When the eccentric disk is rotated while the PU head 3 is stopped, the position on the disk 100 irradiated by the PU head 3 crosses the track. The greater the degree of eccentricity, the greater the number of track crossing pulses. In ST23, the number of track crossing pulses for one round is counted. One round may be measured, or a plurality of rounds may be measured and averaged.

  In ST24, it is determined whether or not the track crossing pulse per round is within a predetermined range. If the track crossing pulse per round is within a predetermined range in ST25 (YES in ST25), it is determined in ST26 that the degree of eccentricity or warpage is within the predetermined range. If the threshold value is exceeded (NO in ST25), it is determined in ST27 that the degree of eccentricity or warpage exceeds a predetermined range.

  Next, the OPC process 73 of the apparatus 1 will be described using the flowchart of FIG. FIG. 7B is a subflow of ST32 or ST35 of FIG. In ST31 of FIG. 7A, the process moves to a PCA (Power Calibration Area) in the lead-in area on the inner circumference side. In ST32, β measurement processing is performed. This β is a value used as an index when performing OPC, and is a value representing asymmetry when a pit recorded by 8/16 conversion at a predetermined laser intensity is read (for example, Annex H of ECMA359, etc.) reference.).

  ST32 is configured by the subflow of FIG. In ST321, the laser power is set to a predetermined value. In ST321 to ST323, this laser power set value is set in a plurality of stages, and these steps are repeatedly executed. In ST322, test recording is performed with the laser power set in ST321. In ST323, β is calculated. β can be expressed as β = (A1 + A2) / (A1−A2) where Hi of the RF signal is A1 and LOW is A2 (A2 <0). The optimum value is obtained when β is minimum. In ST324, the above ST321 to ST323 are repeated, and the laser power that minimizes β is selected.

  In ST34, it moves to a predetermined position on the outermost periphery side. In ST35, β measurement processing is performed as in ST32. In ST36, the recording power that minimizes β is searched. If the recording power searched in ST32 and ST36 is greatly different, it can be determined that the disk 100 is a bad disk.

  Next, the bad disk determination processing 70 of the apparatus 1 will be described with reference to the flowchart of FIG. In ST41, the strategy confirmation processing 71 shown in FIG. 4 is performed. In ST42, it is determined whether there is a strategy. If there is a strategy (YES in ST42), the process moves to ST43. If there is no strategy (NO in ST42), it is determined that the disk 100 set by moving to ST48 is a bad disk, and then the flow of FIG. 8 ends.

  In ST43, any one of the external quality determination processing 72 shown in FIGS. 5 and 6 is performed. In ST44, it is determined whether the degree of eccentricity or warpage exceeds a predetermined range. If this predetermined range is exceeded (YES in ST44), it is determined that the disk 100 set by moving to ST48 is a bad disk, and then the flow of FIG. 8 ends. If the degree of eccentricity or warpage is within a predetermined range (NO in ST44), the process moves to ST45.

  In ST45, the OPC process 73 shown in FIG. 7 is performed. In ST46, when the OPC value is the outer circumference and the inner circumference and the difference exceeds the second threshold value (YES in ST46), it is determined in ST48 that the disk is a bad disk, and then the flow of FIG. 8 ends. To do. If the determinations of ST42, ST44, and ST46 are all NO, it is determined that the disk is not a bad disk, and the flow of FIG. 8 ends.

Next, the bad disk processing 74 of the apparatus 1 will be described with reference to the flowchart of FIG. This process represents the process when the process branches to ST48 in FIG. In ST 51, an OSD (On-Screen Display) indicating “This disc is a bad disc and cannot be recorded or may be read even if it can be recorded” is output to the display 105.
In ST52, a key input as to whether or not to record is accepted and accepted as a choice of two. In ST53, when a key input for recording is received from the operation unit 79 (YES in ST53), the control unit 7 instructs the start of recording in ST54.

  For example, if this recording is dubbing of a moving image recorded on the HD 66, the HDD 67 reads data from the HD 66 and records a video signal on the disc 100 via the recording / reproduction processing circuit 6 and the circuits 62 and 63. Furthermore, if the data recorded on the HD 66 is a copy-once copy restricted due to copyright, it cannot be recorded on the disc 100 since it is copied once when it is recorded on the HDD. It is possible to move data to 100. Therefore, after recording on the disc 100, the data is deleted from the HD 66.

  If a key input indicating that recording is not performed is received from the operation unit 79 in ST53 (NO in ST53), the drive unit of the disc tray 8 ejects the disc 100 in ST55.

  A second embodiment according to the application of the above embodiment will be described with reference to FIGS. In the second embodiment, the configuration of FIG. 2 can be used as it is, but the bad disk detection process 70 and the bad disk process 74 performed by the control unit 7 are different. FIGS. 10 and 11 are obtained by adding a flow to FIGS. 8 and 9 of the first embodiment. Steps having the same functions as those in FIGS. 8 and 9 are denoted by the same step numbers. Yes.

  In the second embodiment, the process is different when “determined that the degree of eccentricity or warpage exceeds a predetermined range” in ST44 of FIG. 8 (ST17 of FIG. 5) (YES in ST44). Move inward from the outermost periphery at predetermined intervals (not necessarily constant intervals) (NO in ST442 and ST441) and search for a range in which ST16 “determines that the degree of eccentricity or warpage is within the predetermined range” To do. In ST441, as a result of moving inward in this way, has it moved to the innermost side (in the area where data can be recorded on the disc, the innermost side, hereinafter "the innermost side" is the same)? Judge whether. This process is repeated until the innermost circumference side is reached (as long as ST441 is NO). If it reaches the innermost circumference side (YES in ST441), it can be determined that the disk has a large eccentricity over the entire area of the disk 100. In this case, it is determined in ST48 that the disk is a bad disk.

  If the processing of FIG. 10 is performed as the bad disk determination processing 70, even if “determined to be over” (ST17) at the outermost periphery, it is not immediately YES in ST44 of FIG. It is not determined ”(ST48). The entire range of the disc 100 cannot be used, but a usable range can be searched.

  Further, in the second embodiment, when it is resolved that “determined that it is over” (ST17) on the inner periphery side than the outermost periphery, in ST450, ST45 in FIG. 8 and ST34 in FIG. The outer peripheral side to be set is set to the outermost peripheral side within the range “determined as being within a predetermined range” (ST16 in FIG. 5) searched in ST441 and ST442. When “determined to be within range” (ST16) at the outermost periphery, the outer periphery set in ST45 of FIG. 8 and ST34 of FIG. 7 is set to the outermost periphery.

  If it is determined in ST46 in FIG. 10 that the difference between the OPC values is large between the outer circumference and the inner circumference (YES in ST46), the β measurement process is performed again on the inner circumference side rather than the inner circumference side set in ST450 (ST462). In the β measurement process of ST462, unless the innermost circumference side is reached (NO in ST461), the difference between the outer circumference and the inner circumference of the OPC value is in a certain range while moving in a stepwise manner. Repeatedly executed (YES in ST46). If it reaches the innermost circumference side (YES in ST461), it is determined in ST48 that it is a bad disk.

  If the difference is within a certain range between the outer circumference and the inner circumference (NO in ST46), the recordable range is determined in ST471, and the flow ends. Here, the recordable range is from the inner circumference side to the inside of the position where the β measurement process is finally performed in ST462.

  As described above, the process of FIG. 10 can finally determine the range that can be partially used in the disk 100 in ST462.

  With reference to FIG. 11, the bad disk processing of the second embodiment (corresponding to the processing of FIG. 9 of the first embodiment) will be described. This process is executed when the area that can be recorded in ST471 of the disc 100 is determined. If it is determined that all the areas cannot be used, the flow of FIG. 9 can be applied to this embodiment.

  In the second embodiment, in ST511, an OSD indicating that “data can be partially recorded in the optical disc 100” is output. Also, in ST521, a key input indicating whether or not to compress and record data is received from the operation unit 79. Since the recordable area is not the entire range of the disk but a partial area, if all of the original data cannot be recorded as it is, the user accepts whether or not the data is compressed and recorded. As this compression method, compression may be performed reversibly, or video signals and audio signals may be recorded at a lower bit rate.

  If a key input indicating that data is compressed and recorded is accepted in ST531 (YES in ST531), the data is compressed and recorded so that the data can be stored in the recordable range of the recording disk 100 in ST53. To do. If a key input indicating that recording is not to be performed is accepted in ST521 (NO in ST531), the disc tray 8 is driven and the disc 100 is ejected in ST54. After ST531 and ST54, the flow ends.

A diagram showing the state of a bad disk 1 is a block diagram showing the configuration of an optical disc device according to a first embodiment. Flow diagram showing an example of the contents of a strategy table recorded on a disc FIG. 3 is a flowchart showing strategy confirmation processing of the optical disc apparatus according to the first embodiment. The flowchart showing Example 1 of the external shape quality determination process of the optical disk apparatus of 1st Embodiment. FIG. 7 is a flowchart showing Example 2 of the external shape quality determination process of the optical disc device according to the first embodiment. FIG. 3 is a flowchart showing an OPC process of the optical disc apparatus according to the first embodiment. FIG. 3 is a flowchart showing disk determination processing of the optical disk apparatus according to the first embodiment. FIG. 3 is a flowchart showing disk determination processing of the optical disk apparatus according to the first embodiment. FIG. 7 is a flowchart showing a disc determination process of the optical disc apparatus according to the second embodiment. Flow chart showing bad disk processing of the optical disk apparatus of the second embodiment

Explanation of symbols

1-optical disk device 2-spindle motor
3-PU head, 30-pickup lens, 31-laser diode,
32-beam splitter, 33-photo detector, 34-actuator,
40-RF signal amplifier circuit, 41-FE / TE generator, 42-drive circuit,
5-wobble detection circuit, 6-recording / reproduction processing circuit,
62—Laser power control circuit,
63-laser driving circuit, 65-decoder, 7-control unit,
70-bad disk determination processing, 71-strategy confirmation processing,
72-Outline quality judgment processing, 73-OPC processing,
74-bad disk processing, 75-strategy, 79-operation unit, 8-disk tray, 66-HD, 67-HDD,
100-disc, 101-center, 102-center hole,
105-display, 106-speaker

Claims (6)

A PU (Pick-Up) head that irradiates an optical disc set in the optical disc apparatus main body with laser light, records data on the optical disc, and reads data recorded on the optical disc,
In an optical disc apparatus comprising: a data processing unit that encodes a data format to be recorded on the optical disc,
Using the PU head, based on the intensity of the laser beam reflected by the optical disc, the outer shape quality judging means for judging the degree of distortion of the optical disc;
A recording parameter storage unit for storing recording parameters when recording data on individual optical discs;
OPC (Optimum Write Power Control) for measuring the recording power of the laser beam that is optimal for recording data on the optical disk by performing test recording on a part of the optical disk using the PU head. OPC means for performing in the first region and the second region outside the first region,
In any of the following (A) to (C):
(A) As a result of reading the optical disc using the optical disc unit, when the recording parameter corresponding to the disc is not stored in the recording parameter storage unit,
(B) When the outer shape quality determination means determines that the degree of distortion of the optical disk exceeds a predetermined range,
(C) When the optimum recording power of the optical disc measured by the OPC means has a difference between values in the first and second areas exceeding a predetermined threshold value,
An optical disc apparatus comprising: a disc determination unit that determines that the optical disc is a poor optical disc.   The optical disc apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the disc determination unit includes an informing unit for informing, when it is determined that the optical disc is a poor optical disc. The outer shape quality determining means determines the degree of distortion of the optical disc at positions P1 to Pn (n is an integer) moved stepwise from the outer periphery to the inner side of the disc, and the degree of distortion of the optical disc is determined within the predetermined range. Search for a position Pk (k is any one of 1 to n)
The OPC means moves the first area for performing the OPC stepwise from the outside to the inside so that the difference between the values in the first and second areas falls within the threshold value. Explore the region of
The disc determination unit detects a recordable region of the optical disc based on the first area searched by the outline quality determination unit and the position Pk searched by the OPC unit. An optical disk device according to the above. When the optical disk device is instructed to record data on the optical disk,
The optical disk according to claim 1, wherein the data processing unit compresses the data so that the data instructed to be recorded falls within a recordable area of the optical disk detected by the disk determination unit. apparatus.   The outer shape quality judging means judges the amount of vertical and horizontal deviation from the track of the optical disk based on the intensity of the laser beam irradiated by the PU head, and determines the amount of the optical disk track based on the amount of deviation. The optical disk apparatus according to claim 1, wherein tracking servo control for tracking is performed, and a degree of distortion of the optical disk is determined based on the shift amount during the control.   5. The optical disc apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the outer shape quality determination unit determines the degree of distortion of the optical disc based on a result of measuring the number of tracks that have passed through the irradiation position of the PU head.

Images