HK40013390A - Electro-optic displays - Google Patents

Description

Electro-optic display

Reference to related applications

This application claims priority from U.S. patent application No.62/512,212 filed on 30/5/2017. This application also relates to U.S. patent application 15/015,822 (publication No. 2016/0225322), filed 2016, month 2, day 4; U.S. patent application 15/014,236 (publication No. 2016/0225321) filed on 3/2/2016; and U.S. patent application 15/266,554 (publication No. 2017/0076672) filed on 2016, 9, 15.

All of the above listed applications are incorporated by reference in their entirety.

Technical Field

The subject matter disclosed herein relates to apparatus and methods for driving electro-optic displays. In particular, the subject matter relates to backplane designs for electro-optic displays and methods for driving and/or discharging such displays.

Background

An electrophoretic display or EPD is typically driven by a so-called DC (direct current) balanced waveform. It has been demonstrated that DC balanced waveforms have been demonstrated to improve long term use of EPDs by reducing severe hardware degradation and eliminating other reliability issues. However, the DC-balanced waveform constraints limit the set of possible waveforms that can be used to drive an EPD display, making it difficult or sometimes impossible to achieve advantageous features via waveform modes. For example, when implementing a "no flash" black-on-white display mode, excessive white edge accumulation may be seen when the gray tone transition to black is adjacent to a non-flashing black background. To clear these edges, a DC-unbalanced driving scheme may work well, but such a driving scheme requires breaking the DC-balanced constraint. However, a driving scheme or waveform with DC imbalance may cause hardware degradation over time, thereby shortening the lifetime of the display device. Accordingly, there is a need to design electro-optic displays that can operate with DC imbalance waveforms or drive schemes without suffering hardware degradation.

Disclosure of Invention

According to one embodiment of the subject matter presented herein, an electro-optic display may include an electrophoretic material configured to display an image, and an active component coupled to the electrophoretic material to release charge within the electrophoretic material.

In another embodiment consistent with the subject matter disclosed herein, an electro-optic display may include an electrophoretic material configured to display an image, and a passive component coupled to the electrophoretic material to release charge within the electrophoretic material.

In yet another embodiment, a method for discharging a remnant voltage from an electro-optic display, wherein the electro-optic display may have an electrophoretic material configured to display an image, the electrophoretic material being between a pixel electrode and a common electrode, a Thin Film Transistor (TFT) coupled to the electrophoretic material and configured to discharge charge from the electrophoretic material, and a select line coupled to the TFT to activate the TFT, may include providing a voltage through the select line to activate the TFT to establish a conductive path with the electrophoretic material through the TFT, and discharging charge within the electrophoretic material through the conductive path.

Drawings

FIG. 1 is one embodiment of an equivalent circuit of a display pixel according to the subject matter presented herein;

FIGS. 2A and 2B are graphs showing the gray tone and ghost shift of the display due to shifts in TFT performance;

FIG. 3 is an exemplary pixel design to enable use of post-drive discharge without introducing optical offset according to the subject matter presented herein;

FIG. 4 is another pixel design in accordance with the subject matter presented herein to enable the use of post-drive discharge without introducing optical offset;

FIG. 5 is a voltage sequence for discharging after active refresh;

FIG. 6 is another pixel design in accordance with the subject matter presented herein to enable the use of post-drive discharge without introducing optical offset;

FIG. 7 is yet another pixel design in accordance with the subject matter presented herein to enable the use of post-drive discharge without introducing optical offset; and

fig. 8 is a voltage sequence for discharging after active refresh.

Detailed Description

The subject matter disclosed herein relates to improving the durability of electro-optic displays. In particular, it relates to improving the variation of optical properties, such as mitigating grey tone variation and ghost variation caused by component stress.

As applied to materials or displays, the term "electro-optic" is used herein in its conventional sense in the imaging arts to refer to a material having first and second display states differing in at least one optical property, the material being changed from its first display state to its second display state by application of an electric field to the material. Although the optical property is typically a color perceptible to the human eye, it may be another optical property, such as light transmission, reflection, luminescence, or, in the case of a display for machine reading, pseudo-color in the sense of a change in reflectivity of electromagnetic wavelengths outside the visible range.

The terms "bistable" and "bistability" are used herein in their conventional sense in the art to refer to displays comprising display elements having first and second display states differing in at least one optical property such that, after any given element is driven to assume its first or second display state by an addressing pulse having a finite duration, that state will last at least several times (e.g. at least 4 times) the minimum duration of the addressing pulse required to change the state of that display element after the addressing pulse has terminated. It is shown in U.S. patent No.7,170,670 that some particle-based electrophoretic displays that support gray scale can be stabilized not only in their extreme black and white states, but also in their intermediate gray states, as can some other types of electro-optic displays. This type of display is properly referred to as "multi-stable" rather than bi-stable, but for convenience the term "bi-stable" may be used herein to cover both bi-stable and multi-stable displays.

The term "gray state" is used herein in its conventional sense in the imaging art to refer to a state intermediate two extreme optical states of a pixel, but does not necessarily imply a black-and-white transition between the two extreme states. For example, several of the above referenced imperial patents and published applications describe electrophoretic displays in which the extreme states are white and deep blue, so that the intermediate "gray state" is effectively pale blue. In fact, as already mentioned, the change in optical state may not be a color change at all. The terms "black" and "white" may be used hereinafter to refer to the two extreme optical states of the display, and should be understood to generally include extreme optical states that are not strictly black and white, such as the white and deep blue states described above. The term "monochrome" may be used hereinafter to refer to a display or drive scheme that drives a pixel only to its two extreme optical states without an intermediate grey state.

The term "pixel" is used herein in its conventional meaning in the display art to mean the smallest unit of a display that is capable of producing all the colors that the display itself can display. In a full color display, each pixel is typically composed of a plurality of sub-pixels, each of which can display less than all of the colors that the display itself can display. For example, in most conventional full-color displays, each pixel is composed of a red sub-pixel, a green sub-pixel, a blue sub-pixel, and optionally a white sub-pixel, each capable of displaying a variety of colors from black to the brightest version of the specified color.

Several types of electro-optic displays are known. One type of electro-optic display is a rotating bichromal member type, as described in, for example, U.S. patent nos. 5,808,783, 5,777,782, 5,760,761, 6,054,071, 6,055,091, 6,097,531, 6,128,124, 6,137,467, and 6,147,791 (although this type of display is commonly referred to as a "rotating bichromal ball" display, the term "rotating bichromal member" is preferably more accurate because in some of the patents mentioned above, the rotating member is not spherical). Such displays use a number of small bodies (usually spherical or cylindrical) comprising two or more parts with different optical properties and an internal dipole. These bodies are suspended within liquid-filled cavities within a matrix, the cavities being filled with liquid so that the bodies are free to rotate. The appearance of the display is changed by: an electric field is applied to the display, thereby rotating the body to various positions and changing which part of the body is seen through the viewing surface. This type of electro-optic medium is generally bistable.

Another type of electro-optic display uses an electrochromic medium, for example in the form of a nano-electrochromic film (nanochromic film) comprising electrodes formed at least in part of a semiconducting metal oxide and a plurality of dye molecules capable of reverse color change attached to the electrodes; see, e.g., O' Regan, B, et al, Nature 1991,353,737 and Wood, D., Information Display,18(3),24 (3 months 2002). See also Bach, u. et al, adv.mater, 2002,14(11), 845. Nano-electrochromic films of this type are also described, for example, in U.S. patent nos. 6,301,038; 6,870,657, respectively; and 6,950,220. This type of media is also generally bistable.

Another type of electro-optic display is the electro-wetting display developed by Philips and described in Hayes, R.A. et al, "Video-speed electronic Paper Based on electric wetting", Nature,425,383-385 (2003). Such electrowetting displays can be made bistable as shown in us patent No.7,420,549.

Another type of electro-optic display, which has been the subject of intensive research and development for many years, is a particle-based electrophoretic display, in which a plurality of charged particles move through a fluid under the influence of an electric field. Electrophoretic displays may have attributes of good brightness and contrast, wide viewing angles, state bistability, and low power consumption compared to liquid crystal displays.

As mentioned above, electrophoretic media require the presence of a fluid. In most prior art electrophoretic media, the fluid is a liquid, but the electrophoretic medium can be produced using a gaseous fluid; see, e.g., Kitamura, T. et al, "electronic Toner movement for electronic Paper-like display", IDW Japan,2001, Paper HCS 1-1, and Yamaguchi, Y. et al, "Toner display using organic substrates charged semiconductor, IDW Japan,2001, Paper AMD 4-4). See also U.S. patent nos. 7,321,459 and 7,236,291. Such gas-based electrophoretic media are susceptible to the same problems when used in a direction that allows for particle settling, such as in signs where the media are arranged in a vertical plane, due to the same particle settling as the liquid-based electrophoretic media. In fact, the problem of particle settling in gas-based electrophoretic media is more severe than in liquid-based electrophoretic media, because the viscosity of gaseous suspending fluids is lower compared to liquids, thereby allowing faster settling of the electrophoretic particles.

A number of patents and applications assigned to or in the name of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and yingke corporation describe various techniques for encapsulating electrophoretic and other electro-optic media. Such encapsulated media comprise a plurality of microcapsules, each microcapsule itself comprising an internal phase containing electrophoretically-mobile particles in a fluid medium, and a capsule wall surrounding the internal phase. Typically, the capsules themselves are held in a polymeric binder to form a coherent layer between two electrodes. The techniques described in these patents and applications include:

(a) electrophoretic particles, fluids, and fluid additives; see, e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,002,728 and 7,679,814;

(b) capsule, adhesive and packaging process; see, e.g., U.S. patent nos. 6,922,276 and 7,411,719;

(c) films and sub-assemblies comprising electro-optic material; see, e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,982,178 and 7,839,564;

(d) backsheets, adhesive layers, and other auxiliary layers and methods for use in displays; see, e.g., U.S. patent nos. d485,294; 6,124,851, respectively; 6,130,773, respectively; 6,177,921, respectively; 6,232,950, respectively; 6,252,564, respectively; 6,312,304, respectively; 6,312,971, respectively; 6,376,828, respectively; 6,392,786, respectively; 6,413,790, respectively; 6,422,687, respectively; 6,445,374, respectively; 6,480,182, respectively; 6,498,114, respectively; 6,506,438, respectively; 6,518,949, respectively; 6,521,489, respectively; 6,535,197, respectively; 6,545,291, respectively; 6,639,578, respectively; 6,657,772, respectively; 6,664,944, respectively; 6,680,725, respectively; 6,683,333, respectively; 6,724,519, respectively; 6,750,473, respectively; 6,816,147, respectively; 6,819,471, respectively; 6,825,068, respectively; 6,831,769, respectively; 6,842,167, respectively; 6,842,279, respectively; 6,842,657, respectively; 6,865,010, respectively; 6,873,452, respectively; 6,909,532, respectively; 6,967,640, respectively; 6,980,196, respectively; 7,012,735; 7,030,412, respectively; 7,075,703, respectively; 7,106,296, respectively; 7,110,163, respectively; 7,116,318, respectively; 7,148,128, respectively; 7,167,155, respectively; 7,173,752; 7,176,880, respectively; 7,190,008, respectively; 7,206,119, respectively; 7,223,672, respectively; 7,230,751, respectively; 7,256,766, respectively; 7,259,744; 7,280,094, respectively; 7,301,693, respectively; 7,304,780, respectively; 7,327,511, respectively; 7,347,957, respectively; 7,349,148, respectively; 7,352,353, respectively; 7,365,394, respectively; 7,365,733, respectively; 7,382,363, respectively; 7,388,572, respectively; 7,401,758, respectively; 7,442,587, respectively; 7,492,497, respectively; 7,535,624, respectively; 7,551,346, respectively; 7,554,712, respectively; 7,583,427, respectively; 7,598,173, respectively; 7,605,799, respectively; 7,636,191, respectively; 7,649,674, respectively; 7,667,886, respectively; 7,672,040, respectively; 7,688,497, respectively; 7,733,335, respectively; 7,785,988, respectively; 7,830,592, respectively; 7,843,626, respectively; 7,859,637, respectively; 7,880,958, respectively; 7,893,435, respectively; 7,898,717, respectively; 7,905,977, respectively; 7,957,053, respectively; 7,986,450, respectively; 8,009,344, respectively; 8,027,081, respectively; 8,049,947, respectively; 8,072,675, respectively; 8,077,141, respectively; 8,089,453, respectively; 8,120,836, respectively; 8,159,636, respectively; 8,208,193, respectively; 8,237,892, respectively; 8,238,021, respectively; 8,362,488, respectively; 8,373,211, respectively; 8,389,381, respectively; 8,395,836, respectively; 8,437,069, respectively; 8,441,414, respectively; 8,456,589, respectively; 8,498,042, respectively; 8,514,168, respectively; 8,547,628, respectively; 8,576,162, respectively; 8,610,988, respectively; 8,714,780, respectively; 8,728,266, respectively; 8,743,077, respectively; 8,754,859, respectively; 8,797,258, respectively; 8,797,633, respectively; 8,797,636, respectively; 8,830,560, respectively; 8,891,155, respectively; 8,969,886, respectively; 9,147,364, respectively; 9,025,234, respectively; 9,025,238, respectively; 9,030,374, respectively; 9,140,952, respectively; 9,152,003, respectively; 9,152,004, respectively; 9,201,279, respectively; 9,223,164, respectively; 9,285,648, respectively; and 9,310,661; and U.S. patent application publication No. 2002/0060321; 2004/0008179, respectively; 2004/0085619, respectively; 2004/0105036, respectively; 2004/0112525, respectively; 2005/0122306, respectively; 2005/0122563, respectively; 2006/0215106, respectively; 2006/0255322, respectively; 2007/0052757, respectively; 2007/0097489, respectively; 2007/0109219, respectively; 2008/0061300, respectively; 2008/0149271, respectively; 2009/0122389, respectively; 2009/0315044, respectively; 2010/0177396, respectively; 2011/0140744, respectively; 2011/0187683, respectively; 2011/0187689, respectively; 2011/0292319, respectively; 2013/0250397, respectively; 2013/0278900, respectively; 2014/0078024, respectively; 2014/0139501, respectively; 2014/0192000, respectively; 2014/0210701, respectively; 2014/0300837, respectively; 2014/0368753, respectively; 2014/0376164, respectively; 2015/0171112, respectively; 2015/0205178, respectively; 2015/0226986, respectively; 2015/0227018, respectively; 2015/0228666, respectively; 2015/0261057, respectively; 2015/0356927, respectively; 2015/0378235, respectively; 2016/077375, respectively; 2016/0103380, respectively; and 2016/0187759; and international application publication No. wo 00/38000; european patent nos. 1,099,207B1 and 1,145,072B 1;

(e) color formation and color adjustment; see, e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,017,584; 6,664,944, respectively; 6,864,875, respectively; 7,075,502, respectively; 7,167,155, respectively; 7,667,684, respectively; 7,791,789, respectively; 7,956,841, respectively; 8,040,594, respectively; 8,054,526, respectively; 8,098,418, respectively; 8,213,076, respectively; and 8,363,299; and U.S. patent application publication No. 2004/0263947; 2007/0109219, respectively; 2007/0223079, respectively; 2008/0023332, respectively; 2008/0043318, respectively; 2008/0048970, respectively; 2009/0004442, respectively; 2009/0225398, respectively; 2010/0103502, respectively; 2010/0156780, respectively; 2011/0164307, respectively; 2011/0195629, respectively; 2011/0310461, respectively; 2012/0008188, respectively; 2012/0019898, respectively; 2012/0075687, respectively; 2012/0081779, respectively; 2012/0134009, respectively; 2012/0182597, respectively; 2012/0212462, respectively; 2012/0157269, respectively; and 2012/0326957;

(f) a method for driving a display; see, e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,012,600 and 7,453,445;

(g) an application for a display; see, e.g., U.S. patent nos. 7,312,784 and 8,009,348;

(h) non-electrophoretic displays, such as those described in U.S. patent nos. 6,241,921; 6,950,220, respectively; 7,420,549 and 8,319,759; and U.S. patent application publication No. 2012/0293858.

(i) Microcell structures, wall materials, and methods of forming microcells; see, e.g., U.S. patent nos. 7,072,095 and 9,279,906; and

(j) a method for filling and sealing a microcell; see, for example, U.S. patent nos. 7,144,942 and 7,715,088.

The present application further relates to U.S. patent nos. d485,294; 6,124,851, respectively; 6,130,773, respectively; 6,177,921, respectively; 6,232,950, respectively; 6,252,564, respectively; 6,312,304, respectively; 6,312,971, respectively; 6,376,828, respectively; 6,392,786, respectively; 6,413,790, respectively; 6,422,687, respectively; 6,445,374, respectively; 6,480,182, respectively; 6,498,114, respectively; 6,506,438, respectively; 6,518,949, respectively; 6,521,489, respectively; 6,535,197, respectively; 6,545,291, respectively; 6,639,578, respectively; 6,657,772, respectively; 6,664,944, respectively; 6,680,725, respectively; 6,683,333, respectively; 6,724,519, respectively; 6,750,473, respectively; 6,816,147, respectively; 6,819,471, respectively; 6,825,068, respectively; 6,831,769, respectively; 6,842,167, respectively; 6,842,279, respectively; 6,842,657, respectively; 6,865,010, respectively; 6,873,452, respectively; 6,909,532, respectively; 6,967,640, respectively; 6,980,196, respectively; 7,012,735; 7,030,412, respectively; 7,075,703, respectively; 7,106,296, respectively; 7,110,163, respectively; 7,116,318, respectively; 7,148,128, respectively; 7,167,155, respectively; 7,173,752; 7,176,880, respectively; 7,190,008, respectively; 7,206,119, respectively; 7,223,672, respectively; 7,230,751, respectively; 7,256,766, respectively; 7,259,744; 7,280,094, respectively; 7,301,693, respectively; 7,304,780, respectively; 7,327,511, respectively; 7,347,957, respectively; 7,349,148, respectively; 7,352,353, respectively; 7,365,394, respectively; 7,365,733, respectively; 7,382,363, respectively; 7,388,572, respectively; 7,401,758, respectively; 7,442,587, respectively; 7,492,497, respectively; 7,535,624, respectively; 7,551,346, respectively; 7,554,712, respectively; 7,583,427, respectively; 7,598,173, respectively; 7,605,799, respectively; 7,636,191, respectively; 7,649,674, respectively; 7,667,886, respectively; 7,672,040, respectively; 7,688,497, respectively; 7,733,335, respectively; 7,785,988, respectively; 7,830,592, respectively; 7,843,626, respectively; 7,859,637, respectively; 7,880,958, respectively; 7,893,435, respectively; 7,898,717, respectively; 7,905,977, respectively; 7,957,053, respectively; 7,986,450, respectively; 8,009,344, respectively; 8,027,081, respectively; 8,049,947, respectively; 8,072,675, respectively; 8,077,141, respectively; 8,089,453, respectively; 8,120,836, respectively; 8,159,636, respectively; 8,208,193, respectively; 8,237,892, respectively; 8,238,021, respectively; 8,362,488, respectively; 8,373,211, respectively; 8,389,381, respectively; 8,395,836, respectively; 8,437,069, respectively; 8,441,414, respectively; 8,456,589, respectively; 8,498,042, respectively; 8,514,168, respectively; 8,547,628, respectively; 8,576,162, respectively; 8,610,988, respectively; 8,714,780, respectively; 8,728,266, respectively; 8,743,077, respectively; 8,754,859, respectively; 8,797,258, respectively; 8,797,633, respectively; 8,797,636, respectively; 8,830,560, respectively; 8,891,155, respectively; 8,969,886, respectively; 9,147,364, respectively; 9,025,234, respectively; 9,025,238, respectively; 9,030,374, respectively; 9,140,952, respectively; 9,152,003, respectively; 9,152,004, respectively; 9,201,279, respectively; 9,223,164, respectively; 9,285,648, respectively; and 9,310,661; and U.S. patent application publication No. 2002/0060321; 2004/0008179, respectively; 2004/0085619, respectively; 2004/0105036, respectively; 2004/0112525, respectively; 2005/0122306, respectively; 2005/0122563, respectively; 2006/0215106, respectively; 2006/0255322, respectively; 2007/0052757, respectively; 2007/0097489, respectively; 2007/0109219, respectively; 2008/0061300, respectively; 2008/0149271, respectively; 2009/0122389, respectively; 2009/0315044, respectively; 2010/0177396, respectively; 2011/0140744, respectively; 2011/0187683, respectively; 2011/0187689, respectively; 2011/0292319, respectively; 2013/0250397, respectively; 2013/0278900, respectively; 2014/0078024, respectively; 2014/0139501, respectively; 2014/0192000, respectively; 2014/0210701, respectively; 2014/0300837, respectively; 2014/0368753, respectively; 2014/0376164, respectively; 2015/0171112, respectively; 2015/0205178, respectively; 2015/0226986, respectively; 2015/0227018, respectively; 2015/0228666, respectively; 2015/0261057, respectively; 2015/0356927, respectively; 2015/0378235, respectively; 2016/077375, respectively; 2016/0103380, respectively; and 2016/0187759; and international application publication No. wo 00/38000; european patent nos. 1,099,207B1 and 1,145,072B 1; all of the applications listed above are incorporated by reference in their entirety.

This application also relates to U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,930,026; 6,445,489, respectively; 6,504,524; 6,512,354, respectively; 6,531,997, respectively; 6,753,999, respectively; 6,825,970, respectively; 6,900,851, respectively; 6,995,550, respectively; 7,012,600; 7,023,420, respectively; 7,034,783, respectively; 7,061,166, respectively; 7,061,662, respectively; 7,116,466, respectively; 7,119,772; 7,177,066, respectively; 7,193,625, respectively; 7,202,847, respectively; 7,242,514, respectively; 7,259,744; 7,304,787, respectively; 7,312,794, respectively; 7,327,511, respectively; 7,408,699, respectively; 7,453,445, respectively; 7,492,339, respectively; 7,528,822, respectively; 7,545,358, respectively; 7,583,251, respectively; 7,602,374, respectively; 7,612,760, respectively; 7,679,599, respectively; 7,679,813, respectively; 7,683,606, respectively; 7,688,297, respectively; 7,729,039, respectively; 7,733,311, respectively; 7,733,335, respectively; 7,787,169, respectively; 7,859,742, respectively; 7,952,557, respectively; 7,956,841, respectively; 7,982,479, respectively; 7,999,787, respectively; 8,077,141, respectively; 8,125,501, respectively; 8,139,050, respectively; 8,174,490, respectively; 8,243,013, respectively; 8,274,472, respectively; 8,289,250, respectively; 8,300,006, respectively; 8,305,341, respectively; 8,314,784, respectively; 8,373,649, respectively; 8,384,658, respectively; 8,456,414, respectively; 8,462,102, respectively; 8,537,105, respectively; 8,558,783, respectively; 8,558,785, respectively; 8,558,786, respectively; 8,558,855, respectively; 8,576,164, respectively; 8,576,259, respectively; 8,593,396, respectively; 8,605,032, respectively; 8,643,595, respectively; 8,665,206, respectively; 8,681,191, respectively; 8,730,153, respectively; 8,810,525, respectively; 8,928,562, respectively; 8,928,641, respectively; 8,976,444, respectively; 9,013,394, respectively; 9,019,197, respectively; 9,019,198, respectively; 9,019,318, respectively; 9,082,352, respectively; 9,171,508, respectively; 9,218,773, respectively; 9,224,338, respectively; 9,224,342, respectively; 9,224,344, respectively; 9,230,492, respectively; 9,251,736, respectively; 9,262,973, respectively; 9,269,311, respectively; 9,299,294, respectively; 9,373,289, respectively; 9,390,066, respectively; 9,390,661, respectively; and 9,412,314; and U.S. patent application publication No. 2003/0102858; 2004/0246562, respectively; 2005/0253777, respectively; 2007/0070032, respectively; 2007/0076289, respectively; 2007/0091418, respectively; 2007/0103427, respectively; 2007/0176912, respectively; 2007/0296452, respectively; 2008/0024429, respectively; 2008/0024482, respectively; 2008/0136774, respectively; 2008/0169821, respectively; 2008/0218471, respectively; 2008/0291129, respectively; 2008/0303780, respectively; 2009/0174651, respectively; 2009/0195568, respectively; 2009/0322721, respectively; 2010/0194733, respectively; 2010/0194789, respectively; 2010/0220121, respectively; 2010/0265561, respectively; 2010/0283804, respectively; 2011/0063314, respectively; 2011/0175875, respectively; 2011/0193840, respectively; 2011/0193841, respectively; 2011/0199671, respectively; 2011/0221740, respectively; 2012/0001957, respectively; 2012/0098740, respectively; 2013/0063333, respectively; 2013/0194250, respectively; 2013/0249782, respectively; 2013/0321278, respectively; 2014/0009817, respectively; 2014/0085355, respectively; 2014/0204012, respectively; 2014/0218277, respectively; 2014/0240210, respectively; 2014/0240373, respectively; 2014/0253425, respectively; 2014/0292830, respectively; 2014/0293398, respectively; 2014/0333685, respectively; 2014/0340734, respectively; 2015/0070744, respectively; 2015/0097877, respectively; 2015/0109283, respectively; 2015/0213749, respectively; 2015/0213765, respectively; 2015/0221257, respectively; 2015/0262255, respectively; 2016/0071465, respectively; 2016/0078820, respectively; 2016/0093253, respectively; 2016/0140910, respectively; and 2016/0180777; all of the applications listed above are incorporated by reference in their entirety.

Many of the aforementioned patents and applications recognize that the walls surrounding discrete microcapsules in an encapsulated electrophoretic medium may be replaced by a continuous phase, thereby producing a so-called "polymer dispersed electrophoretic display", wherein the electrophoretic medium comprises a plurality of discrete droplets of electrophoretic fluid and a continuous phase of polymeric material, and the discrete droplets of electrophoretic fluid within such a polymer dispersed electrophoretic display may be considered capsules or microcapsules, even if no discrete capsule film is associated with each individual droplet; see, for example, the aforementioned U.S. patent No.6,866,760. Accordingly, for the purposes of this application, such polymer-dispersed electrophoretic media are considered to be a subclass of encapsulated electrophoretic media.

A related type of electrophoretic display is the so-called "microcell electrophoretic display". In microcell electrophoretic displays, the charged particles and fluid are not encapsulated within microcapsules, but are held within a plurality of cavities formed within a carrier medium (typically a polymer film). See, for example, U.S. patent nos. 6,672,921 and 6,788,449, both assigned to Sipix Imaging, inc.

Although electrophoretic media are typically opaque (because, for example, in many electrophoretic media, the particles substantially block the transmission of visible light through the display) and operate in a reflective mode, many electrophoretic displays can be made to operate in a so-called "shutter mode" in which one display state is substantially opaque and one display state is light-transmissive. See, for example, U.S. patent nos. 5,872,552, 6,130,774, 6,144,361, 6,172,798, 6,271,823, 6,225,971, and 6,184,856. A dielectrophoretic display similar to an electrophoretic display but relying on a change in electric field strength may operate in a similar mode; see U.S. patent No.4,418,346. Other types of electro-optic displays can also operate in the shutter mode. Electro-optic media operating in shutter mode may be used in the multilayer structure of full color displays; in this configuration, at least one layer adjacent to the viewing surface of the display operates in a shutter mode to expose or hide a second layer further from the viewing surface.

Encapsulated electrophoretic displays are generally not plagued by the aggregation and settling failure modes of conventional electrophoretic devices and provide further benefits such as the ability to print or coat the display on a variety of flexible and rigid substrates. (the use of the word "printing" is intended to include all forms of printing and coating including, but not limited to, pre-metered coating such as slot or extrusion coating, slide or cascade coating, curtain coating, roll coating such as knife coating, forward and reverse roll coating, gravure coating, dip coating, spray coating, meniscus coating, spin coating, brush coating, air knife coating, screen printing processes, electrostatic printing processes, thermal printing processes, ink jet printing processes, electrophoretic deposition (see U.S. patent No.7,339,715), and other similar techniques.) thus, the resulting display may be flexible. In addition, because the display media can be printed using a variety of methods, the display itself can be inexpensively manufactured.

Other types of electro-optic materials may also be used in the present invention.

An electrophoretic display typically comprises a layer of electrophoretic material and at least two further layers, one of which is an electrode layer, arranged on opposite sides of the electrophoretic material. In most such displays, both layers are electrode layers, and one or both of the electrode layers are patterned to define pixels of the display. For example, one electrode layer may be patterned as elongate row electrodes, while the other electrode layer may be patterned as elongate column electrodes extending at right angles to the row electrodes, the pixels being defined by the intersections of the row and column electrodes. Alternatively, and more typically, one electrode layer is in the form of a single continuous electrode, and the other electrode layer is patterned into a matrix of pixel electrodes, each pixel electrode defining one pixel of the display. In another type of electrophoretic display intended for use with a stylus, a print head or a similar movable electrode separate from the display, only one of the layers adjacent to the electrophoretic layer comprises an electrode, which layer is typically a protective layer on the opposite side of the electrophoretic layer, intended to prevent the movable electrode from damaging the electrophoretic layer.

In yet another embodiment, for example as described in US patent No. US 6,704,133, an electrophoretic display may be constructed with two successive electrodes and an electrophoretic layer and a photo-electrophoretic layer between the electrodes. Incident light can be used to change the state of the electrophoretic medium because the photoelectrophoretic material changes resistivity as photons are absorbed. Such a device is shown in fig. 1. As described in us patent No.6,704,133, the device of fig. 1 works best when driven by an emission source (e.g. an LCD display), which is located on the opposite side of the display from the viewing surface. In some embodiments, the device of U.S. patent No.6,704,133 includes a special barrier layer between the front electrode and the photo-electrophoretic material to reduce "dark current" caused by leakage of incident light from the front of the display through the reflective electro-optic medium.

The aforementioned U.S. patent No.6,982,178 describes a method of assembling a solid state electro-optic display, including an encapsulated electrophoretic display, which is well suited for large scale production. Essentially, this patent describes a so-called "front plane laminate" ("FPL") which in turn comprises a light-transmissive electrically conductive layer; a solid electro-optic medium layer in electrical contact with the conductive layer; an adhesive layer; and a release sheet. Typically, the light transmissive, electrically conductive layer will be carried on a light transmissive substrate, which is preferably flexible, in the sense that the substrate can be manually wound onto a 10 inch (254mm) diameter drum (e.g., a drum) without permanent deformation. The term "light transmissive" is used in this patent and refers herein to a layer so designated that transmits sufficient light to enable a viewer to observe a change in the display state of the electro-optic medium when viewed through the layer, which would normally be observed through the conductive layer and the adjacent substrate (if any); in the case of electro-optic media exhibiting a change in reflectivity at non-visible wavelengths, the term "optically transmissive" should of course be construed to refer to transmission of the relevant non-visible wavelengths. The substrate will typically be a polymeric film and will typically have a thickness of about 1 to about 25 mils (25 to 634 μm), preferably about 2 to about 10 mils (51 to 254 μm). The conductive layer is typically a thin metal or metal oxide layer, such as aluminum or ITO, or may be a conductive polymer. Aluminum or ITO coated polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film is commercially available, for example from "aluminized Mylar" ("Mylar" is a registered trademark) from dupont of wilmington, tera, and such commercial materials may be well used in front plane laminates.

The aforementioned U.S. patent No.6,982,178 also describes a method of testing the electro-optic medium in the front plane laminate prior to incorporating the front plane laminate into a display. In this test method, the release sheet is provided with a conductive layer and a voltage sufficient to change the optical state of the electro-optic medium is applied between the conductive layer and the conductive layer on the opposite side of the electro-optic medium. Observing the electro-optic medium will then detect any faults in the medium, thereby avoiding the lamination of faulty electro-optic medium into the display, thereby incurring the cost of scrapping the entire display, rather than just scrapping a defective front plane laminate.

The aforementioned U.S. patent No.6,982,178 also describes a second method of testing an electro-optic medium in a front plane laminate by placing an electrostatic charge on a release sheet to form an image on the electro-optic medium. The image is then viewed in the same manner as before to detect any faults in the electro-optic medium.

Assembly of an electro-optic display using such a front plane laminate may be achieved by: the release sheet is removed from the front plane laminate and the adhesive layer is contacted with the backplane under conditions effective to adhere the adhesive layer to the backplane, thereby securing the adhesive layer, the electro-optic medium layer, and the conductive layer to the backplane. This process is well suited for mass production, as the front plane laminate can be mass produced, typically using roll-to-roll coating techniques, and then cut to any size for a particular backing sheet.

U.S. patent No.7,561,324 describes a so-called "double release tab" which is essentially a simplified version of the front plane laminate of the aforementioned U.S. patent No.6,982,178. One form of dual release sheet comprises a layer of solid electro-optic medium sandwiched between two adhesive layers, one or both of which is covered by a release sheet. Another form of dual release sheet comprises a layer of solid electro-optic medium sandwiched between two release sheets. Both forms of the dual release film are intended for use in a process generally similar to that of assembling an electro-optic display from a front planar laminate already described, but involving two separate laminations; typically, in a first lamination, the dual release sheet is laminated to the front electrode to form a front sub-assembly, and then in a second lamination, the front sub-assembly is laminated to the backplane to form the final display, although the order of the two laminations can be reversed if desired.

U.S. patent No.7,839,564 describes a so-called "inverted front plane laminate," which is a variation of the front plane laminate described in the above-mentioned U.S. patent No.6,982,178. The inverted front plane laminate sequentially comprises at least one of a light-transmitting protective layer and a light-transmitting conductive layer; an adhesive layer; a solid electro-optic medium layer; and a release sheet. The inverted front plane laminate is used to form an electro-optic display having a lamination adhesive layer between an electro-optic layer and a front electrode or front substrate; a generally thin second adhesive layer may or may not be present between the electro-optic layer and the backplane. Such electro-optic displays may combine good resolution with good low temperature performance.

The photo-electrophoretic properties of certain pigments have been recognized some time ago. For example, U.S. patent No.3,383,993 discloses a photo-electrophoretic imaging device that can be used to reproduce a projected image on a medium, typically a transparent electrode (e.g., ITO). However, the photoelectrophoresis processes described in the' 993 patent and other related patents of the schlerox Corporation (Xerox Corporation) are irreversible because the photoelectrophoresis process involves migration of the photoelectrophoretic particles to an "injection electrode" where they will attach to the electrode. This phenomenon has not been widely commercialized due to the lack of reversibility, and the cost and complexity of installation.

Although the displays of the present invention are intended to display images for long periods of time with little energy input, the cyclic (loop) displays as described above can be used to refresh content on the same time scale as light emitting displays (e.g., large format LED displays). The display of the present invention may display two different images in less than one hour, such as in less than 10 minutes, such as in less than five minutes, such as in less than two minutes. Furthermore, the refresh periods may be staggered depending on the use of the display. For example, a shipping plan may be refreshed every five minutes with advertisements lasting 30 seconds and then returned for an additional five minute period.

In some cases, one method of enabling the DC imbalance waveform is to discharge the display module after an active update. Discharging involves shorting the imaging film of the display to eliminate residual charge that accumulates on the imaging film (e.g., the electrophoretic material layer) due to DC unbalanced driving. The reduction in the build-up of residual charge (measured by residual voltage) and the corresponding module polarization, which leads to permanent degradation of the imaged film due to electrochemical causes, has been successfully demonstrated using a renewed post-drive discharge (referred to herein as UPD or UPD).

It has now been found that residual voltages are, for reasons and in effect, a more common phenomenon in electrophoretic and other impulse driven electro-optic displays. It has also been found that DC imbalance may lead to a reduction in the long-term lifetime of certain electrophoretic displays.

There are a number of potential sources of residual voltage. It is believed (although certain embodiments are in no way limited by this idea) that the primary cause of the residual voltage is ionic polarization within the various layers of material forming the display.

This polarization occurs in various ways. In the first (referred to for convenience as "type I") polarization, an ion bilayer is created across or adjacent to a material interface. For example, a positive potential at an indium tin oxide ("ITO") electrode may produce a corresponding polarizing layer of negative ions in the adjacent lamination adhesive. The decay rate of such a polarizing layer is related to the recombination of isolated ions in the laminating adhesive layer. The geometry of such a polarising layer is determined by the shape of the interface, but may be planar in nature.

In a second ("type II") type of polarization, nodular, crystalline, or other types of material heterogeneity within a single material may result in regions where ions may move faster or slower than the surrounding material. Differences in ion mobility rates can result in different degrees of charge polarization in the dielectric body, and thus polarization may occur in a single display element. Such polarization may be substantially localized or dispersed throughout the layer.

In a third ("type III") type of polarization, polarization may occur at any interface that represents a barrier to charge transport for any particular type of ion. One example of such an interface in a microcavity electrophoretic display is the boundary between an electrophoretic suspension ("internal phase") comprising a suspending medium and particles, and a surrounding medium ("external phase") comprising walls, a binder, and a binder. In many electrophoretic displays, the internal phase is a hydrophobic liquid and the external phase is a polymer, such as gelatin. The ions present in the internal phase may be insoluble and non-diffusible in the external phase and vice versa. When an electric field is applied perpendicular to such an interface, oppositely-signed polarizing layers will accumulate on either side of the interface. When the applied electric field is removed, the resulting unbalanced charge distribution will result in a measurable residual voltage potential that decays with relaxation time determined by the mobility of the ions in the two phases on either side of the interface.

Polarization may occur during the drive pulse. Each image update is an event that may affect the residual voltage. A positive waveform voltage can produce a residual voltage across the electro-optic medium that is of the same or opposite polarity (or almost zero), depending on the particular electro-optic display.

It will be apparent from the foregoing discussion that polarization can occur at multiple locations within an electrophoretic or other electro-optic display, each location having its own decay time profile, primarily at interfaces and on material heterogeneity. Depending on the arrangement of these voltage sources with respect to the electrically active part (e.g. electrophoretic suspension) (in other words, the polarization charge distributions), and the degree of electrical coupling between each charge distribution and the movement of the particles through the suspension or other electro-optical activity, the various polarizations will have more or less detrimental effects. Because electrophoretic displays operate by movement of charged particles, which inherently causes polarization of the electro-optic layer, preferred electrophoretic displays are not in a sense that there is always no residual voltage present in the display, but rather a display in which the residual voltage does not cause undesirable electro-optic behavior. Ideally, the residual pulse will be minimized and the residual voltage will drop below 1V, preferably below 0.2V, within 1 second, preferably within 50ms, so that the electrophoretic display can affect all transitions between optical states by introducing a minimum pause between image updates, without taking into account the effect of the residual voltage. For electrophoretic displays operating at video rates or voltages below +/-15V, these ideal values should be reduced accordingly. Similar considerations apply to other types of electro-optic displays.

In summary, the residual voltage is at least substantially a result of ion polarization occurring at the interface or within the display material components within the material itself as a phenomenon. Such polarization is particularly problematic when it lasts for a medium time scale of about 50 milliseconds to about an hour or more. The residual voltage may manifest itself in a variety of ways as image ghosting or visual artifacts, the severity of which may vary with the elapsed time between image updates. The residual voltage also causes DC imbalance and reduces the ultimate display lifetime. Thus, the effect of the residual voltage may be detrimental to the quality of the electrophoretic or other electro-optical device, and it is desirable to minimize the sensitivity of the residual voltage itself, as well as the optical state of the device, to the effect of the residual voltage.

In fact, the charges accumulated within the electrophoretic material due to the polarization effect described above may be discharged or drained to mitigate the residual voltage effect. In some embodiments, such discharging may be performed after a refresh or drive sequence.

In some embodiments, the post-drive or post-refresh discharge may be performed using readily available Thin Film Transistor (TFT) backplanes 100 for EPD and controller circuitry for EPD, as shown in fig. 1. In use, each display pixel may comprise a thin film transistor UPD (e.g. TFT)_(upd))102, the thin film transistor UPD 102 may be configured to provide a degree of electrical conduction so as to maintain the top plane 106 and the source (or data) line VS of the display at the same voltage potential for a period of time (e.g., ground). The above-mentioned patent application 15/014,236, which is incorporated herein in its entirety, discusses this drive method in more detail. Display pixel 100 as shown herein and the various embodiments shown below generally include a pixel electrode104 and a top plane 106, wherein the top plane 106 may comprise a substrate and a common electrode, and the common electrode may be a transparent conductive layer. In general, TFTs_(upd)102 are designed to function as pixel control transistors to provide or transmit drive waveforms to the pixel electrodes 104 of the pixels. Thus, the TFT is in contrast to a non-conducting state (i.e., an "OFF" state)_(upd)102 are generally configured to operate in an ON state (e.g., an "ON" state) for a very short time, e.g., a ratio of "ON" time to "OFF" time is greater than 1: 1000. Although using an uPDD, depending on the configuration of the uPDD, would change the ratio to about 1:2 or 1:50, which would result in positive bias stress after long term use, in some cases the amount used would be equivalent to the stress typically caused by thousands of image updates or more. It is known that positive bias stress can cause threshold voltage shifts in permanent amorphous silicon TFTs. The shift in threshold voltage can cause a change in the behavior of the affected TFT and TFT backplane, which in turn causes an optical shift in the optical performance of the EPD. Optical shifts due to uPDD have been observed and are shown in FIGS. 2A and 2B. As shown, display graytone (fig. 2A) and ghost offset (fig. 2B) values increased significantly over two years after tens of thousands of update cycles due to the uPDD.

By using only a single TFT, e.g. the TFT shown in FIG. 1_(upd)102, both normal image update and uPDD pass through the same TFT (i.e., TFT)_(upd)) And (5) realizing. Alternatively, in some embodiments, an additional TFT may be added to each pixel and used only for the uPDD discharge scheme. Pixel TFT for normal display operation (e.g., TFT of FIG. 1) while the overall discharge scheme remains unchanged_(upd)102) Will be used only for active display update as in standard active matrix driving of EPDs which do not include a discharge. This configuration ensures that the pixel TFT for normal display operation has stable performance and is not affected by discharge. While the additional TFT for discharge may experience a threshold voltage shift due to positive bias stress, this will not cause an optical shift for EPD and as long as the TFT is on during discharge (i.e., as long as the possible threshold voltage shift is due to the discharge scheme)Considered), this will not affect the discharge operation. Such a configuration may allow stable display operation without optical response shift while allowing a DC unbalanced waveform to be realized by the post-drive discharge.

An exemplary embodiment according to the above concept is shown in fig. 3. In addition to standard pixel TFTs (e.g. TFTs)_(upd)302) In addition, display pixel 300 may include active components dedicated to draining residual voltage or excess charge of electrophoretic film 314. The active component may be any kind of transistor (e.g. TFT, CMOS, etc.) or any other component (e.g. diode or photodetector/diode) that can be activated or turned on by applying electrical energy (e.g. voltage) or optical energy, or generally any electrically/optically activated switch. To illustrate the general concept, a TFT (e.g., an n-type TFT) is used herein, but it should be understood that this is not meant to be limiting. As shown in fig. 3, a designated transistor TFT may be used_(dis)304 to discharge residual voltage charges within the electrophoretic imaging film 314. In this configuration, the TFT_(upd)The gate of 302 is connected from the gate driver output to a select line (e.g., Vg (upd)308), while the TFT_(dis)304 is connected to a discharge select line, e.g. Vg_(dis)306, which may be used to turn the TFT on and off at its gate (e.g., by applying a voltage to the gate of the transistor via a select line to affect the gate-source or gate-drain potential)_(dis)304. In one embodiment, all of the pixel discharge select lines for a plurality of pixels may be connected together to a single display output, for example to simultaneously turn on all of the pixel discharge TFTs (e.g., TFTs) of all of the display pixels of a display_(dis)304) The transistors are used to discharge the entire display at the same time. In some embodiments, a TFT_(upd)302 and TFT_(dis)The source lines of 304 may all be connected to a data line Vs 310. During operation, the TFTs may be turned off for all pixels_(dis)304, and TFT_(upd)302 are used to actively update the display. During discharge, TFT_(dis)304 may be turned on and the TFT_(upd)302 may be turned off. In some embodiments, a TFT_(upd)302 and TFT_(dis)304 inEither or both may be n-type transistors. In that case, the TFT_(upd)The source of 302 may be electrically coupled to source line Vs310, and a TFT_(upd)The drain of 302 may be coupled to a pixel electrode 312 of display pixel 300. In addition, if TFT_(dis)The 304 transistor is an n-type transistor, its source may be coupled to a source line Vs310 and its drain may be coupled to a pixel electrode 312. In fact, when TFTs are used_(dis)304 are turned on and turned on, charge from the electrophoretic film 314 may pass through the TFT_(dis)304 and/or the source line Vs310 are drained or released.

FIG. 4 illustrates another embodiment of a display pixel 400 according to the subject matter presented herein. In this embodiment, as shown in FIG. 4, a discharge TFT_(dis)402 can be electrically coupled to the top plane 404 of the EPD (e.g., connected to the common electrode of the EPD) and to a Vcom 406 voltage line (e.g., the drain of the discharge TFT402 is directly coupled to the top plane 404 of the EPD, while its source is coupled to the pixel electrode 408 of the pixel). In this configuration, the discharge of the display module does not occur through the source driver (e.g., VS 410), but is done directly through the top plane connection. In addition, with this setting, since the Vs 410 is not connected to the discharge TFT in this case_(dis)402 and thus does not affect its operation, and thus can be controlled by discharging the TFT_(dis)402 is placed in a weakly conductive state to act as a resistance or conductive path for the discharge to discharge the display during the update. In this configuration, the TFT_(dis)402 may be via a select line Vg_(dis)412 are activated and the transistor TFT is_(upd)414 may pass through select line Vg_(upd)416 are activated, with two select lines (i.e., Vg)_(dis)412 and Vg_(upd)416) And may optionally not be electrically coupled.

Fig. 5 shows an exemplary voltage sequence that can be applied to either of the two proposed pixel designs presented in fig. 3 and 4. This voltage sequence ignores potential RC time constraints that may arise when switching from one voltage to another or that may be introduced during, for example, a power down. Vg_(upd)Connected to the select lines, switching between high and low voltages toThe TFTs are turned on and off. Vcom can be held at a constant voltage, which is typically equal to the TFT, during active refresh_(upd)The trip voltage of (c). Vs is connected to data lines that provide data signals to refresh the pixels with a desired waveform. Vg_(dis)Connected to a low voltage to hold the TFT_(dis)And closing. Vg during discharge after active refresh_(upd)Off, and Vcom and Vs remain at 0V. Switch on Vg_(dis)So as to pass through the TFT_(dis)Shorting the electrophoretic imaging film. The voltage sequence shown in fig. 5 is an exemplary illustration of a discharge scheme using the novel TFT pixel design. This new TFT pixel design is flexible enough to accommodate more complex implementations of the discharge scheme. The main idea is to discharge by turning on the dedicated TFT while excluding the pixel TFT for normal display operation from the discharge operation. Secondary effects may include the following possibilities: at the end of discharge, the TFT is turned off_(dis)The withstand transition voltage may affect the discharge efficiency or optical performance of the display. By a Vg_(dis)Implementing appropriately designed power down circuitry (with some RC attenuation) can mitigate this effect to prevent or minimize it.

In the above description, the TFT_(upd)And TFT_(dis)Are both N-type TFTs. These transistors may also be P-type TFTs or N-type and P-type, respectively. One of the examples based on the circuit in fig. 3 is shown in fig. 6, where the TFT_(upd)604 and TFT_(dis)602 are all P-type TFTs. The same operation can be performed on the circuit in fig. 4 (not shown here).

Alternatively, instead of active components such as TFTs, passive components may be employed to discharge the EPD. FIG. 7 illustrates another possible implementation of the subject matter presented herein, wherein resistor R_dis702 are placed in parallel with the storage capacitor Cs 704 of the pixel. As shown, resistor R_dis702 are also coupled to a pixel electrode 706 and a common electrode 708. The purpose of the resistor is to provide a path for the residual voltage to be discharged from the electrophoretic imaging film at the end of the drive period. The advantage of this pixel design is that it does not require the addition of an extra line Vg_disTo control the second TFT. However, fromAt R_dis702 now have a fixed resistance value and therefore it is necessary to design R appropriately_dis702. For example, with R_dis702 is added to the RC constant R associated with the pixel circuit_dis702 need to be greater than the drive frame time in order to achieve the desired pixel voltage retention characteristics during the frame time. The RC constant also needs to be low enough to provide sufficient discharge at the end of the drive period. In some other embodiments, R_dis702 may also be replaced by a field switchable shunt resistor using amorphous silicon or any other technique that provides an appropriate resistance in parallel with the electrophoretic imaging film to discharge without preventing normal driving operation.

In addition to providing a dedicated TFT for discharge only and another TFT for display refresh only to avoid optical shifts in display performance due to positive bias stress, the subject matter presented herein also enables some additional modes of use that may be beneficial as described below.

FIG. 8 shows an exemplary voltage sequence applicable only to the circuit shown in FIG. 3, where TFTs are used_upd302 and TFT_dis304 have dedicated gate lines. In this voltage sequence, during the active refresh phase, the TFT_upd302 and TFT_dis304 are all turned on, and at the end of the refresh the TFTs are turned on_dis304 may or may not be turned on to discharge. In this use mode, the TFT_dis304 may provide additional current for faster pixel charging, which may enable, for example, higher frame rate driving. Furthermore, the TFT in the proposed pixel design_dis304 may also be used as a global update transistor. By turning on the TFT_dis304 and turn off TFT_upd302, we can prevent the TFT from being updated when global update is performed_upd302 long term positive bias.

As such, the subject matter presented herein introduces a method to achieve a DC imbalance waveform without creating positive bias stress on the pixel TFTs used for standard active matrix drive display operation by utilizing post-drive discharge and its various implementations. This will result in a more stable optical response of the display while achieving a post-drive discharge.

It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that many changes and modifications can be made to the specific embodiments of the invention described above without departing from the scope of the invention. Accordingly, the entire foregoing description is to be construed in an illustrative and not a restrictive sense.

Claims (16)

1. An electro-optic display comprising:

an electrophoretic material configured to display an image; and

an active component coupled to the electrophoretic material for releasing charge within the electrophoretic material.

2. An electro-optic display according to claim 1 wherein the active component is a Thin Film Transistor (TFT).

3. An electro-optic display according to claim 2 further comprising a first select line coupled to the active component to activate the active component.

4. An electro-optic display according to claim 3 further comprising a second TFT for transmitting a waveform to the electrophoretic material.

5. An electro-optic display according to claim 4 further comprising a second select line coupled to the second TFT to activate the second TFT, wherein the second select line and the first select line are not electrically connected.

6. An electro-optic display according to claim 2 wherein the TFT is an n-type TFT.

7. An electro-optic display according to claim 1 wherein the electrophoretic material is disposed between a common electrode and a pixel electrode.

8. An electro-optic display according to claim 7 wherein the active component is a TFT and the drain of the TFT is coupled to the pixel electrode.

9. An electro-optic display according to claim 7 wherein the active component is a TFT and the source of the TFT is coupled to the pixel electrode.

10. An electro-optic display according to claim 9 wherein the drain of the TFT is coupled to the common electrode.

11. An electro-optic display comprising:

an electrophoretic material configured to display an image; and

a passive component coupled to the electrophoretic material for releasing charge within the electrophoretic material.

12. An electro-optic display according to claim 11 wherein the electrophoretic material is disposed between a common electrode and a pixel electrode.

13. An electro-optic display according to claim 12 wherein the passive component is coupled to the pixel electrode and the common electrode.

14. A method for discharging a remnant voltage from an electro-optic display having an electrophoretic material configured to display an image, the electrophoretic material being between a pixel electrode and a common electrode, a Thin Film Transistor (TFT) coupled to the electrophoretic material and configured to discharge charge from the electrophoretic material, and a select line coupled to the TFT to activate the TFT, the method comprising:

providing a voltage through the select line to activate the TFT to establish a conductive path with the electrophoretic material through the TFT; and

discharging charge within the electrophoretic material through the conductive path.

15. The method of claim 14, wherein the discharging step further comprises discharging the charge through the common electrode.

16. The method of claim 14, wherein the discharging step further comprises discharging the charge through the pixel electrode.