EP1733071A2 - Remote chamber methods for removing surface deposits - Google Patents
Remote chamber methods for removing surface depositsInfo
- Publication number
- EP1733071A2 EP1733071A2 EP05734780A EP05734780A EP1733071A2 EP 1733071 A2 EP1733071 A2 EP 1733071A2 EP 05734780 A EP05734780 A EP 05734780A EP 05734780 A EP05734780 A EP 05734780A EP 1733071 A2 EP1733071 A2 EP 1733071A2
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- gas mixture
- fluorocarbon
- oxygen
- activated
- chamber
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Withdrawn
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 43
- NBVXSUQYWXRMNV-UHFFFAOYSA-N fluoromethane Chemical compound FC NBVXSUQYWXRMNV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 38
- 238000004140 cleaning Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 26
- 230000037361 pathway Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 10
- 230000008021 deposition Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 8
- 239000007789 gas Substances 0.000 claims description 74
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 claims description 45
- 239000001301 oxygen Substances 0.000 claims description 33
- 229910052760 oxygen Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 33
- QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N atomic oxygen Chemical compound [O] QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 32
- 230000007935 neutral effect Effects 0.000 claims description 12
- VYPSYNLAJGMNEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Silicium dioxide Chemical compound O=[Si]=O VYPSYNLAJGMNEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 10
- 230000003213 activating effect Effects 0.000 claims description 8
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 claims description 7
- -1 perfluorocarbon compound Chemical class 0.000 claims description 7
- XUIMIQQOPSSXEZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Silicon Chemical compound [Si] XUIMIQQOPSSXEZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 6
- 229910052710 silicon Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 6
- 239000010703 silicon Substances 0.000 claims description 6
- 239000000377 silicon dioxide Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 229910052581 Si3N4 Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 4
- HQVNEWCFYHHQES-UHFFFAOYSA-N silicon nitride Chemical compound N12[Si]34N5[Si]62N3[Si]51N64 HQVNEWCFYHHQES-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 4
- OBNDGIHQAIXEAO-UHFFFAOYSA-N [O].[Si] Chemical class [O].[Si] OBNDGIHQAIXEAO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000012159 carrier gas Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- HBMJWWWQQXIZIP-UHFFFAOYSA-N silicon carbide Chemical compound [Si+]#[C-] HBMJWWWQQXIZIP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 2
- 229910010271 silicon carbide Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 2
- 235000012239 silicon dioxide Nutrition 0.000 claims description 2
- WFKWXMTUELFFGS-UHFFFAOYSA-N tungsten Chemical compound [W] WFKWXMTUELFFGS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 2
- 229910052721 tungsten Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000010937 tungsten Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 25
- 238000005530 etching Methods 0.000 description 17
- 238000000623 plasma-assisted chemical vapour deposition Methods 0.000 description 8
- XKRFYHLGVUSROY-UHFFFAOYSA-N Argon Chemical compound [Ar] XKRFYHLGVUSROY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- 238000000151 deposition Methods 0.000 description 6
- IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N Atomic nitrogen Chemical compound N#N IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 5
- IYRWEQXVUNLMAY-UHFFFAOYSA-N carbonyl fluoride Chemical compound FC(F)=O IYRWEQXVUNLMAY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 5
- 238000005229 chemical vapour deposition Methods 0.000 description 5
- 229920000642 polymer Polymers 0.000 description 5
- TXEYQDLBPFQVAA-UHFFFAOYSA-N tetrafluoromethane Chemical compound FC(F)(F)F TXEYQDLBPFQVAA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 5
- 239000004341 Octafluorocyclobutane Substances 0.000 description 4
- BCCOBQSFUDVTJQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N octafluorocyclobutane Chemical compound FC1(F)C(F)(F)C(F)(F)C1(F)F BCCOBQSFUDVTJQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 235000019407 octafluorocyclobutane Nutrition 0.000 description 4
- QYSGYZVSCZSLHT-UHFFFAOYSA-N octafluoropropane Chemical compound FC(F)(F)C(F)(F)C(F)(F)F QYSGYZVSCZSLHT-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 238000009832 plasma treatment Methods 0.000 description 4
- 241000894007 species Species 0.000 description 4
- 230000001052 transient effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000010792 warming Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000005033 Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy Methods 0.000 description 3
- XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N aluminium Chemical compound [Al] XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 229910052782 aluminium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 229910052786 argon Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 229910052799 carbon Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 229910052681 coesite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 229910052906 cristobalite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 3
- QKCGXXHCELUCKW-UHFFFAOYSA-N n-[4-[4-(dinaphthalen-2-ylamino)phenyl]phenyl]-n-naphthalen-2-ylnaphthalen-2-amine Chemical compound C1=CC=CC2=CC(N(C=3C=CC(=CC=3)C=3C=CC(=CC=3)N(C=3C=C4C=CC=CC4=CC=3)C=3C=C4C=CC=CC4=CC=3)C3=CC4=CC=CC=C4C=C3)=CC=C21 QKCGXXHCELUCKW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 229910052682 stishovite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 229910052905 tridymite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 238000001636 atomic emission spectroscopy Methods 0.000 description 2
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 230000008878 coupling Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000010168 coupling process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005859 coupling reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 229910052731 fluorine Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 238000011065 in-situ storage Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000010849 ion bombardment Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 229910052757 nitrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 238000005215 recombination Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000006798 recombination Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000004065 semiconductor Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000007704 transition Effects 0.000 description 2
- XJDRKILKFZFXPR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 1,1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,4-decafluorobutane;1,1,2,2,3,3-hexafluorocyclopropane Chemical compound FC1(F)C(F)(F)C1(F)F.FC(F)(F)C(F)(F)C(F)(F)C(F)(F)F XJDRKILKFZFXPR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- UEOZRAZSBQVQKG-UHFFFAOYSA-N 2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5-octafluorooxolane Chemical compound FC1(F)OC(F)(F)C(F)(F)C1(F)F UEOZRAZSBQVQKG-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- SYNPRNNJJLRHTI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 2-(hydroxymethyl)butane-1,4-diol Chemical compound OCCC(CO)CO SYNPRNNJJLRHTI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon Chemical compound [C] OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 244000132059 Carica parviflora Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000014653 Carica parviflora Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- YCKRFDGAMUMZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-N Fluorine atom Chemical compound [F] YCKRFDGAMUMZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000004913 activation Effects 0.000 description 1
- PNEYBMLMFCGWSK-UHFFFAOYSA-N aluminium oxide Inorganic materials [O-2].[O-2].[O-2].[Al+3].[Al+3] PNEYBMLMFCGWSK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000005441 aurora Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000015556 catabolic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000576 coating method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000010432 diamond Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910001873 dinitrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000010494 dissociation reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000005593 dissociations Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003628 erosive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003682 fluorination reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229940104869 fluorosilicate Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 239000011521 glass Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000001307 helium Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052734 helium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- SWQJXJOGLNCZEY-UHFFFAOYSA-N helium atom Chemical compound [He] SWQJXJOGLNCZEY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- WMIYKQLTONQJES-UHFFFAOYSA-N hexafluoroethane Chemical compound FC(F)(F)C(F)(F)F WMIYKQLTONQJES-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000005286 illumination Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001939 inductive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005305 interferometry Methods 0.000 description 1
- 231100000053 low toxicity Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 150000002926 oxygen Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 229960004065 perflutren Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003252 repetitive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910001220 stainless steel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000010935 stainless steel Substances 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01J—ELECTRIC DISCHARGE TUBES OR DISCHARGE LAMPS
- H01J37/00—Discharge tubes with provision for introducing objects or material to be exposed to the discharge, e.g. for the purpose of examination or processing thereof
- H01J37/32—Gas-filled discharge tubes
- H01J37/32431—Constructional details of the reactor
- H01J37/32798—Further details of plasma apparatus not provided for in groups H01J37/3244 - H01J37/32788; special provisions for cleaning or maintenance of the apparatus
- H01J37/32853—Hygiene
- H01J37/32862—In situ cleaning of vessels and/or internal parts
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C23—COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
- C23C—COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY DIFFUSION INTO THE SURFACE, BY CHEMICAL CONVERSION OR SUBSTITUTION; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL
- C23C16/00—Chemical coating by decomposition of gaseous compounds, without leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, i.e. chemical vapour deposition [CVD] processes
- C23C16/44—Chemical coating by decomposition of gaseous compounds, without leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, i.e. chemical vapour deposition [CVD] processes characterised by the method of coating
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B08—CLEANING
- B08B—CLEANING IN GENERAL; PREVENTION OF FOULING IN GENERAL
- B08B7/00—Cleaning by methods not provided for in a single other subclass or a single group in this subclass
- B08B7/0035—Cleaning by methods not provided for in a single other subclass or a single group in this subclass by radiant energy, e.g. UV, laser, light beam or the like
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C23—COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
- C23C—COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY DIFFUSION INTO THE SURFACE, BY CHEMICAL CONVERSION OR SUBSTITUTION; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL
- C23C16/00—Chemical coating by decomposition of gaseous compounds, without leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, i.e. chemical vapour deposition [CVD] processes
- C23C16/44—Chemical coating by decomposition of gaseous compounds, without leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, i.e. chemical vapour deposition [CVD] processes characterised by the method of coating
- C23C16/4401—Means for minimising impurities, e.g. dust, moisture or residual gas, in the reaction chamber
- C23C16/4405—Cleaning of reactor or parts inside the reactor by using reactive gases
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C23—COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
- C23F—NON-MECHANICAL REMOVAL OF METALLIC MATERIAL FROM SURFACE; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL; MULTI-STEP PROCESSES FOR SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL INVOLVING AT LEAST ONE PROCESS PROVIDED FOR IN CLASS C23 AND AT LEAST ONE PROCESS COVERED BY SUBCLASS C21D OR C22F OR CLASS C25
- C23F4/00—Processes for removing metallic material from surfaces, not provided for in group C23F1/00 or C23F3/00
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01L—SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES NOT COVERED BY CLASS H10
- H01L21/00—Processes or apparatus adapted for the manufacture or treatment of semiconductor or solid state devices or of parts thereof
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02C—CAPTURE, STORAGE, SEQUESTRATION OR DISPOSAL OF GREENHOUSE GASES [GHG]
- Y02C20/00—Capture or disposal of greenhouse gases
- Y02C20/30—Capture or disposal of greenhouse gases of perfluorocarbons [PFC], hydrofluorocarbons [HFC] or sulfur hexafluoride [SF6]
Definitions
- PECVD plasma-on-assisted chemical vapor deposition
- the use of remote plasma sources avoids some of the erosion of the interior chamber materials that occurs with in situ chamber cleans in which the cleaning is performed by creating a plasma discharge within the PECVD chamber.
- capacitively and inductively coupled RF as well as microwave remote sources have been developed for these sorts of applications, the industry is rapidly moving toward transformer coupled inductively coupled sources in which the plasma has a torroidal configuration and acts as the secondary of the transformer.
- the use of lower frequency RF power allows the use of magnetic cores which enhance the inductive coupling with respect to capacitive coupling; thereby allowing the more efficient transfer of energy to the plasma without excessive ion bombardment which limits the lifetime of the remote plasma source chamber interior.
- a pretreatment gas mixture that is activated to treat the interior surface of the pathway through which an activated cleaning gas passes to the process chamber comprises fluorocarbon and optionally oxygen.
- a preferred pretreatment gas mixture has oxygen verses fluorocarbon molar ratio of less than 1 :1.
- a more preferred pretreatment gas mixture contains no oxygen.
- a cleaning gas mixture that is activated to remove the surface deposition comprises oxygen and fluorocarbon.
- a preferred cleaning gas mixture has oxygen verses fluorocarbon molar ratio of at least 1:3.
- a more preferred cleaning gas mixture has oxygen verses fluorocarbon molar ratio of at least from about 2:1 to about 20:1.
- the fluorocarbon of the invention is herein referred to as a compound comprising of C and F.
- Preferred fluorocarbon in this invention is perfluorocarbon compound.
- fluorocarbon rich plasma it is meant that the gas mixture comprising fluorocarbon and optionally oxygen wherein the molar ratio of oxygen and fluorocarbon is less than about 1 :1 is activated to form a plasma.
- the cleaning gas mixture is composed of
- the fluorocarbon is Zyron® C318N4 with minimum 99.99 vol % of octafluorocyclobutane, and Zyron® 8020 with minimum 99.9 vol % of octafluorocyclobutane, both are manufactured by DuPont and supplied in cylinders.
- Nitrogen source in the examples is nitrogen gas manufactured by Airgas with grade of 4.8 and Argon is manufactured by Airgas with grade of 5.0.
- the activated gas then passed through an aluminum water-cooled heat exchanger to reduce the thermal loading of the aluminum process chamber.
- the surface deposits covered wafer was placed on a temperature controlled mounting in the process chamber.
- the neutral temperature is measured by Optical Emission Spectroscopy (OES), in which rovibrational transition bands of diatomic species like C 2 and N 2 are theoretically fitted to yield neutral temperature. See also B. Bai and H. Sawin, Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A 22 (5), 2014 (2004), herein incorporated as a reference.
- the etching rate of the surface deposits by the activated gas is measured by interferometry equipment in the process chamber.
- N 2 gas is added at the entrance of the pump both to dilute the products to a proper concentration for FTIR measurement and TO re ⁇ uce tne nang-up o ⁇ pro ⁇ ucis in the pump in the case that wet pump is used.
- FTIR was used to measure the concentration of species in the pump exhaust.
- Example 1 It was discovered that after certain periods of use, the etching rate of Zyron® C318N4 will drop to approximately one half of the previous rate. At the same time a much larger amount of COF 2 in the effluent gases was observed. It was also found that rapid closing and opening of the oxygen valve for a period of a few seconds could increase the etching rate back to the previous level.
- the feeding gas composed of O 2 , Zyron® C318N4 (C 4 F ⁇ ) and Ar, wherein O 2 flow rate is 1750 seem, Ar flow rate is 2000 seem, C F ⁇ flow rate is 250 seem. Chamber pressure is 2 torr.
- etching rate jumped up at the transient closing off of oxygen.
- the etching rate then slowly decreased and leveled off corresponding to the COF 2 and CO 2 concentration change in the emission gases.
- the RF power was turned off at 450 seconds.
- the gas mixture passed through the heat exchanger for two minutes. After the treatment, the etching rate was measured again under the same condition as before the treatment. The etching rate was found to be 1150 Angstrom/min, 30% higher than the one before the treatment.
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Metallurgy (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Materials Engineering (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- Microelectronics & Electronic Packaging (AREA)
- Plasma & Fusion (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Condensed Matter Physics & Semiconductors (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Epidemiology (AREA)
- Public Health (AREA)
- Power Engineering (AREA)
- Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
- Optics & Photonics (AREA)
- Drying Of Semiconductors (AREA)
- Chemical Vapour Deposition (AREA)
- Cleaning Or Drying Semiconductors (AREA)
- Cleaning In General (AREA)
- ing And Chemical Polishing (AREA)
Abstract
The present invention relates to an improved remote plasma cleaning method for removing surface deposits from a surface, such as the interior of a deposition chamber that is used in fabricating electronic devices. The improvement involves a fluorocarbon rich plasma pretreatment of interior surface of the pathway from the remote chamber to the surface deposits.
Description
TITLE OF INVENTION Remote Chamber Methods for Removing Surface Deposits
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention. The present invention relates to methods for removing surface deposits by using an activated gas created by remotely activating a gas mixture comprising of oxygen and fluorocarbon. More specifically, this invention involves a fluorocarbon rich plasma pretreatment of interior surface of the pathway from the remote chamber to the surface deposits. 2. Description of Related Art. Remote plasma sources for the production of atomic fluorine are widely used for chamber cleaning in the semiconductor processing industry, particularly in the cleaning of chambers used for Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD) and Plasma Enhanced Chemical Vapor Deposition
(PECVD). The use of remote plasma sources avoids some of the erosion of the interior chamber materials that occurs with in situ chamber cleans in which the cleaning is performed by creating a plasma discharge within the PECVD chamber. While capacitively and inductively coupled RF as well as microwave remote sources have been developed for these sorts of applications, the industry is rapidly moving toward transformer coupled inductively coupled sources in which the plasma has a torroidal configuration and acts as the secondary of the transformer. The use of lower frequency RF power allows the use of magnetic cores which enhance the inductive coupling with respect to capacitive coupling; thereby allowing the more efficient transfer of energy to the plasma without excessive ion bombardment which limits the lifetime of the remote plasma source chamber interior. The semiconductor industry has shifted away from mixtures of fluorocarbons with oxygen for chamber cleaning, which initially were the dominant gases used for in situ chamber cleaning for a number of reasons. First, the emissions of global warming gases from such processes was commonly much higher than that of nitrogen trifluoride (NF3) processes. NF3 dissociates more easily in a discharge and is not
significantly formed by recombination of the product species. Therefore, low levels of global warming emissions can be achieved more easily. In contrast, fluorocarbons are more difficult to breakdown in a discharge and recombine to form species such as tetrafluoromethane (CF4) which are even more difficult to break down than other fluorocarbons. Secondly, it was commonly found that fluorocarbon discharges produced "polymer" depositions that require more frequent wet cleans to remove these deposits that build up after repetitive dry cleans. The propensity of fluorocarbon cleans to deposit "polymers" occurs to a greater extent in remote cleans in which no ion bombardment occurs during the cleaning. These observations dissuaded the industry from developing industrial processes based on fluorocarbon feed gases. In fact, the PECVD equipment manufacturers tested remote cleans based on fluorocarbon discharges, but to date have been unsuccessful because of polymer deposition in the process chambers. However, if the two drawbacks as described above can be resolved, fluorocarbon gases are desirable for their low cost and low- toxicity. While prior work has been done on perfluorocarbon/oxygen discharges with nitrogen addition to enhance the etching of silicon nitride. The enhancement is regarded as the result of the formation of NO by the discharge which in turn reacts with N on the silicon nitride surface, followed by the effective fluorination of Si atoms to form volatile products. CH. Oh et al. Surface and Coatings Technology 171 (2003) 267.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention relates to a method for removing surface deposits, said method comprising: (a) activating in a remote chamber a pretreatment gas mixture comprising fluorocarbon and optionally oxygen wherein the molar ratio of oxygen and fluorocarbon is less than 1 :1 ; and thereafter (b) contacting said activated pretreatment gas mixture with at least a portion of interior surface of a pathway from the remote chamber to the surface deposits; (c) activating in the remote chamber a cleaning gas mixture comprising oxygen and fluorocarbon wherein the molar ratio of
oxygen and fluorocarbon is at least 1 :3; and thereafter (d) passing said activated cleaning gas mixture through said pathway; (e) contacting said activated cleaning gas mixture with the surface deposits and thereby removing at least some of said surface deposits.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGfS) Figure 1. Schematic diagram of an apparatus useful for carrying out the present process. Figure 2. Plot of the effect of transient oxygen shut off to Zyron® C318N4 (C F8) on (a) gas emission, measured by FTIR, (b) etching rate.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION Surface deposits removed in this invention comprise those materials commonly deposited by chemical vapor deposition or plasma- enhanced chemical vapor deposition or similar processes. Such materials include silicon, doped silicon, silicon nitride, tungsten, silicon dioxide, silicon oxynitride, silicon carbide and various silicon oxygen compounds referred to as low K materials, such as FSG (fluorosilicate glass) and SiCOH or PECVD OSG including Black Diamond (Applied Materials), Coral (Novellus Systems) and Aurora (ASM International). One embodiment of this invention is removing surface deposits from the interior of a process chamber that is used in fabricating electronic devices. Such process chamber could be a Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD) chamber or a Plasma Enhanced Chemical Vapor Deposition (PECVD) chamber. The process of the present invention involves an activating step using sufficient power to form an activated gas mixture. Activation may be accomplished by any means allowing for the achievement of dissociation of a large fraction of the feed gas, such as: RF energy, DC energy, laser illumination and microwave energy. The neutral temperature of the resulting plasma depends on the power and the residence time of the gas mixture in the remote chamber. Under certain power input and conditions, neutral temperature will be higher with longer residence time. Here,
preferred neutral temperature of activated cleaning gas mixture is over about 3,000 K. Under appropriate conditions (considering power, gas composition, gas pressure and gas residence time), neutral temperatures of at least about 6000K may be achieved, for example, with octafluorocyclobutane. The activated gas is formed in a remote chamber that is outside of the process chamber, but in close proximity to the process chamber. The remote chamber is connected to the process chamber by any means allowing for transfer of the activated gas from the remote chamber to the process chamber. The remote chamber and means for connecting the remote chamber with the process chamber are constructed of materials known in this field to be capable of containing activated gas mixtures. For instance, aluminum and stainless steel are commonly used for the chamber components. Sometimes AI2O3 is coated on the interior surface to reduce the surface recombination. A pretreatment gas mixture that is activated to treat the interior surface of the pathway through which an activated cleaning gas passes to the process chamber comprises fluorocarbon and optionally oxygen. A preferred pretreatment gas mixture has oxygen verses fluorocarbon molar ratio of less than 1 :1. A more preferred pretreatment gas mixture contains no oxygen. A cleaning gas mixture that is activated to remove the surface deposition comprises oxygen and fluorocarbon. A preferred cleaning gas mixture has oxygen verses fluorocarbon molar ratio of at least 1:3. A more preferred cleaning gas mixture has oxygen verses fluorocarbon molar ratio of at least from about 2:1 to about 20:1. The fluorocarbon of the invention is herein referred to as a compound comprising of C and F. Preferred fluorocarbon in this invention is perfluorocarbon compound. A perfluorocarbon compound in this invention is herein referred to as a compound consisting of C, F and optionally oxygen. Such perfluorocarbon compounds include, but are not limited to tetrafluoromethane, hexafluoroethane, octafluoropropane, hexafluorocyclopropane decafluorobutane, octafluorocyclobutane, carbonyl fluoride and octafluorotetrahydrofuran.
The gas mixture that is activated to form either the pretreatment gas mixture or the cleaning gas mixture may further comprise carrier gases such as argon and helium. A preferred embodiment of the present invention is a method for removing surface deposits from the interior of a process chamber that is used in fabricating electronic devices, said method comprising: (a) activating in a remote chamber a pretreatment gas mixture comprising perfluorocarbon compound and no oxygen; (b) contacting said activated pretreatment gas mixture with at least a portion of interior surface of a pathway from the remote chamber to the surface deposits; (c) activating in the remote chamber a cleaning gas mixture comprising oxygen and perfluorocarbon compound, wherein the molar ratio of oxygen and perfluorocarbon compound is at least 1 :3, using sufficient power for a sufficient time such that said gas mixture reaches a neutral temperature of at least about 3,000 K to form an activated cleaning gas mixture; and thereafter (d) contacting said activated cleaning gas mixture with the interior of said deposition chamber and thereby removing at least some of said surface deposits. It was found that a fluorocarbon rich plasma pretreatment of interior surface of the pathway from the remote chamber to the surface deposits can increase the etching rate. By "fluorocarbon rich plasma", it is meant that the gas mixture comprising fluorocarbon and optionally oxygen wherein the molar ratio of oxygen and fluorocarbon is less than about 1 :1 is activated to form a plasma. In one embodiment of this invention, as described in Example 1 , when the cleaning gas mixture is composed of
02, Zyron® C318N4 (C4F8) and Ar, a rapid closing and opening of the oxygen valve for a period of a few seconds can increase the etching rate. In another embodiment of this invention, as described in Examples 2 and
3, a pretreatment gas mixture consisting of fluorocarbon and Ar is activated and passes through the heat exchanger, a portion of pathway from the remote chamber to the surface deposits. This treatment can also increase the etching rate. It was also found that at the similar conditions of this invention, the drawbacks of the perfluorocarbon compound, i.e. global warming
gases emission and polymer deposition, can be overcome. In the cleaning process of this invention, no significant polymer depositions on the interior surface of process chamber was found. The global warming gas emissions were also very low as shown in Figure 2a. The following Examples are meant to illustrate the invention and are not meant to be limiting:
EXAMPLES Fig. 1 shows a schematic diagram of the remote plasma source and apparatus used to measure the etching rates, plasma neutral temperatures, and exhaust emissions. The remote plasma source is a commercial toroidal-type MKS ASTRON®ex reactive gas generator unit made by MKS Instruments, Andover, MA, USA. The feed gases (e.g. oxygen, fluorocarbon, Argon) were introduced into the remote plasma source from the left, and passed through the toroidal discharge where they were discharged by the 400 KHz radio-frequency power to form an activated gas mixture. The oxygen is manufactured by Airgas with 99.999% purity. The fluorocarbon is Zyron® C318N4 with minimum 99.99 vol % of octafluorocyclobutane, and Zyron® 8020 with minimum 99.9 vol % of octafluorocyclobutane, both are manufactured by DuPont and supplied in cylinders. Nitrogen source in the examples is nitrogen gas manufactured by Airgas with grade of 4.8 and Argon is manufactured by Airgas with grade of 5.0. The activated gas then passed through an aluminum water-cooled heat exchanger to reduce the thermal loading of the aluminum process chamber. The surface deposits covered wafer was placed on a temperature controlled mounting in the process chamber. The neutral temperature is measured by Optical Emission Spectroscopy (OES), in which rovibrational transition bands of diatomic species like C2 and N2 are theoretically fitted to yield neutral temperature. See also B. Bai and H. Sawin, Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A 22 (5), 2014 (2004), herein incorporated as a reference. The etching rate of the surface deposits by the activated gas is measured by interferometry equipment in the process chamber. N2 gas is added at the entrance of the pump both to dilute the products to a proper concentration for FTIR measurement and
TO reαuce tne nang-up oτ proαucis in the pump in the case that wet pump is used. FTIR was used to measure the concentration of species in the pump exhaust. Example 1 It was discovered that after certain periods of use, the etching rate of Zyron® C318N4 will drop to approximately one half of the previous rate. At the same time a much larger amount of COF2 in the effluent gases was observed. It was also found that rapid closing and opening of the oxygen valve for a period of a few seconds could increase the etching rate back to the previous level. In this experiment, the feeding gas composed of O2, Zyron® C318N4 (C4Fβ) and Ar, wherein O2 flow rate is 1750 seem, Ar flow rate is 2000 seem, C Fβ flow rate is 250 seem. Chamber pressure is 2 torr. The 400 KHz 8.9 KW RF power was turned on at -800 seconds and the feeding gas was activated to a neutral temperature estimated to be 5000 K. The activated gas then entered the process chamber and etched the SiO2 surface deposits on the mounting with the temperature controlled at 100° C. At the time of zero second, the oxygen valve was shut off for two seconds and then reopened. As a result of this oxygen feed transient, the COF2 emission decreased abruptly and the CO2 emission increased to maintain the carbon mass balance. After this transient, COF2 concentration slowly increased while CO2 concentration slowly decreased. However, after five minutes, the COF2 and CO2 concentration of emission leveled and did not appear to be returning to the prior levels before the O2 induced transition. The results are shown in Figure 2a. As demonstrated in Figure 2b, etching rate jumped up at the transient closing off of oxygen. The etching rate then slowly decreased and leveled off corresponding to the COF2 and CO2 concentration change in the emission gases. The RF power was turned off at 450 seconds.
Example 2 This experiment was designed to measure the effect of the fluorocarbon rich plasma treatment on the interior surface of the
apparatus. The etching rate was measured as 900 Angstrom/min according to the conditions described below before the fluorocarbon rich plasma treatment. The feeding gas composed of O2, Zyron® 8020 (C F8) and Ar, wherein O2 flow rate is 1750 seem, Ar flow rate is 2000 seem, C4F8 flow rate is 250 seem. Chamber pressure is 2 torr. The feeding gas was activated by 400 KHz 8.8 KW RF power to a neutral temperature of estimated to be 5000 K. The activated gas then passed through the heat exchanger connection, entered the process chamber and etched the SiO2 surface deposits on the mounting with the temperature controlled at 100° C. Then the heat exchanger connection between the remote plasma source and the process chamber was treated by fluorocarbon rich plasma. The feeding gas mixture for the treatment consisted of 250 seem Zyron® 8020 and 2000 seem Ar. After activated by 400 KHz 7.0 KW RF power, the gas mixture passed through the heat exchanger for 2 minutes. After the treatment, the etching rate was measured again under the same condition as before the treatment. The etching rate was found to be 1350 Angstrom/min, 30% higher than the one before the treatment. Example 3 This experiment was designed to measure the effect of the fluorocarbon rich plasma treatment on the interior surface of the apparatus. The etching rate was measured as 850 Angstrom/min according to the conditions described below before the fluorocarbon rich plasma treatment. The feeding gas composed of O2, C3F8 and Ar, wherein O2 flow rate is 1000 seem, Ar flow rate is 2750 seem, C3F8 flow rate is 250 seem. Chamber pressure is 2 torr. The feeding gas was activated by 400 KHz 6.0 KW RF power to a neutral temperature of estimated to be 4500 K. The activated gas then passed through the heat exchanger connection, entered the process chamber and etched the SiO2 surface deposits on the mounting with the temperature controlled at 100° C. Then the heat exchanger connection between the remote plasma source and the process chamber was treated by fluorocarbon rich plasma.
The feeding gas mixture for the treatment consisted of 250 seem C3F8 and 2750 seem Ar. After activated by 400 KHz 5.0 KW RF power, the gas mixture passed through the heat exchanger for two minutes. After the treatment, the etching rate was measured again under the same condition as before the treatment. The etching rate was found to be 1150 Angstrom/min, 30% higher than the one before the treatment.
Claims
1. A method for removing surface deposits, said method comprising: (a) activating in a remote chamber a pretreatment gas mixture comprising fluorocarbon and optionally oxygen wherein the molar ratio of oxygen and fluorocarbon is less than 1 :1 ; and thereafter
(b) contacting said activated pretreatment gas mixture with at least a portion of interior surface of a pathway from the remote chamber to the surface deposits;
(c) activating in the remote chamber a cleaning gas mixture comprising oxygen and fluorocarbon wherein the molar ratio of oxygen and fluorocarbon is at least 1 :3; and thereafter
(d) passing said activated cleaning gas mixture through said pathway; (e) contacting said activated cleaning gas mixture with the surface deposits and thereby removing at least some of said surface deposits.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein said pretreatment gas mixture contains no oxygen.
3. The method of claim 1 wherein said surface deposits is removed from the interior of a deposition chamber that is used in fabricating electronic devices.
4. The method of claim 1 wherein said gas mixture is activated by an RF power source, a DC power source or a microwave power source.
5. The method of claim 1 wherein neutral temperature of said activated cleaning gas mixture is at least about 3000 K.
6. The method of claim 1 wherein said fluorocarbon is a perfluorocarbon compound.
7. The method of claim 1 wherein said gas mixture further comprises a carrier gas.
8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the surface deposit is selected from a group consisting of silicon, doped silicon, silicon nitride, tungsten, silicon dioxide, silicon oxynitride, silicon carbide and various silicon oxygen compounds referred to as low K materials.
9. The method of claim 1 , wherein molar ratio of oxygen and fluorocarbon of said cleaning gas mixture is at least from about 2:1 to about 20:1
Applications Claiming Priority (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US55622704P | 2004-03-24 | 2004-03-24 | |
US64044404P | 2004-12-30 | 2004-12-30 | |
US64083304P | 2004-12-30 | 2004-12-30 | |
PCT/US2005/010691 WO2005095670A2 (en) | 2004-03-24 | 2005-03-24 | Remote chamber methods for removing surface deposits |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1733071A2 true EP1733071A2 (en) | 2006-12-20 |
Family
ID=34965582
Family Applications (3)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP05734780A Withdrawn EP1733071A2 (en) | 2004-03-24 | 2005-03-24 | Remote chamber methods for removing surface deposits |
EP05760434A Withdrawn EP1737998A2 (en) | 2004-03-24 | 2005-03-24 | Remote chamber methods for removing surface deposits |
EP05760380A Withdrawn EP1733072A2 (en) | 2004-03-24 | 2005-03-24 | Remote chamber methods for removing surface deposits |
Family Applications After (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP05760434A Withdrawn EP1737998A2 (en) | 2004-03-24 | 2005-03-24 | Remote chamber methods for removing surface deposits |
EP05760380A Withdrawn EP1733072A2 (en) | 2004-03-24 | 2005-03-24 | Remote chamber methods for removing surface deposits |
Country Status (6)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (3) | EP1733071A2 (en) |
JP (3) | JP2007531289A (en) |
KR (3) | KR20070040748A (en) |
BR (3) | BRPI0508204A (en) |
TW (3) | TWI281715B (en) |
WO (3) | WO2005090638A2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP0697467A1 (en) * | 1994-07-21 | 1996-02-21 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Method and apparatus for cleaning a deposition chamber |
US7581549B2 (en) | 2004-07-23 | 2009-09-01 | Air Products And Chemicals, Inc. | Method for removing carbon-containing residues from a substrate |
RU2008108010A (en) * | 2005-08-02 | 2009-09-10 | Массачусетс Инститьют Оф Текнолоджи (Us) | METHOD OF APPLICATION OF SULFUR FLUORIDE FOR REMOVING SURFACE SEDIMENTS |
US9034199B2 (en) | 2012-02-21 | 2015-05-19 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Ceramic article with reduced surface defect density and process for producing a ceramic article |
US9212099B2 (en) * | 2012-02-22 | 2015-12-15 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Heat treated ceramic substrate having ceramic coating and heat treatment for coated ceramics |
JP6390977B2 (en) * | 2012-12-18 | 2018-09-19 | シースター ケミカルズ インク. | Thin film deposition reactor and process and method for dry cleaning thin film layers in situ |
JP6202423B2 (en) * | 2013-03-05 | 2017-09-27 | パナソニックIpマネジメント株式会社 | Plasma cleaning method and plasma cleaning apparatus |
US9850568B2 (en) | 2013-06-20 | 2017-12-26 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Plasma erosion resistant rare-earth oxide based thin film coatings |
SG10201906117XA (en) * | 2013-12-30 | 2019-08-27 | Chemours Co Fc Llc | Chamber cleaning and semiconductor etching gases |
WO2020137528A1 (en) * | 2018-12-25 | 2020-07-02 | 昭和電工株式会社 | Method for removing deposits and method for forming film |
US11854773B2 (en) | 2020-03-31 | 2023-12-26 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Remote plasma cleaning of chambers for electronics manufacturing systems |
CN116145106B (en) * | 2023-02-21 | 2024-12-24 | 苏州鼎芯光电科技有限公司 | Cleaning method for semiconductor coating process chamber |
Family Cites Families (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5158644A (en) * | 1986-12-19 | 1992-10-27 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Reactor chamber self-cleaning process |
JP2002280376A (en) * | 2001-03-22 | 2002-09-27 | Research Institute Of Innovative Technology For The Earth | Cleaning method for CVD apparatus and cleaning apparatus therefor |
-
2005
- 2005-03-24 KR KR1020067021949A patent/KR20070040748A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2005-03-24 JP JP2007505283A patent/JP2007531289A/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2005-03-24 EP EP05734780A patent/EP1733071A2/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2005-03-24 KR KR1020067021947A patent/KR20070037434A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2005-03-24 KR KR1020067021948A patent/KR20070043697A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2005-03-24 BR BRPI0508204-8A patent/BRPI0508204A/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2005-03-24 EP EP05760434A patent/EP1737998A2/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2005-03-24 BR BRPI0508214-5A patent/BRPI0508214A/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2005-03-24 WO PCT/US2005/010693 patent/WO2005090638A2/en active Application Filing
- 2005-03-24 JP JP2007505282A patent/JP2007531288A/en active Pending
- 2005-03-24 WO PCT/US2005/010691 patent/WO2005095670A2/en active Application Filing
- 2005-03-24 JP JP2007505281A patent/JP2007530792A/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2005-03-24 BR BRPI0508205-6A patent/BRPI0508205A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2005-03-24 WO PCT/US2005/010692 patent/WO2005098086A2/en active Application Filing
- 2005-03-24 EP EP05760380A patent/EP1733072A2/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2005-06-28 TW TW094121536A patent/TWI281715B/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2005-06-28 TW TW094121538A patent/TWI281714B/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2005-06-28 TW TW094121537A patent/TWI284929B/en not_active IP Right Cessation
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
See references of WO2005095670A2 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
JP2007531288A (en) | 2007-11-01 |
KR20070043697A (en) | 2007-04-25 |
TWI281714B (en) | 2007-05-21 |
TWI281715B (en) | 2007-05-21 |
BRPI0508205A (en) | 2007-07-17 |
JP2007531289A (en) | 2007-11-01 |
EP1733072A2 (en) | 2006-12-20 |
JP2007530792A (en) | 2007-11-01 |
TW200623240A (en) | 2006-07-01 |
WO2005090638A3 (en) | 2006-04-13 |
KR20070040748A (en) | 2007-04-17 |
WO2005090638A8 (en) | 2006-11-16 |
WO2005098086A2 (en) | 2005-10-20 |
KR20070037434A (en) | 2007-04-04 |
WO2005095670A2 (en) | 2005-10-13 |
BRPI0508214A (en) | 2007-07-17 |
TW200623281A (en) | 2006-07-01 |
WO2005098086A3 (en) | 2006-05-04 |
WO2005090638A2 (en) | 2005-09-29 |
TWI284929B (en) | 2007-08-01 |
WO2005095670A3 (en) | 2006-05-04 |
TW200623251A (en) | 2006-07-01 |
WO2005090638A9 (en) | 2006-01-26 |
BRPI0508204A (en) | 2007-07-17 |
EP1737998A2 (en) | 2007-01-03 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US20060144820A1 (en) | Remote chamber methods for removing surface deposits | |
US20070107750A1 (en) | Method of using NF3 for removing surface deposits from the interior of chemical vapor deposition chambers | |
US20070028944A1 (en) | Method of using NF3 for removing surface deposits | |
US20090047447A1 (en) | Method for removing surface deposits and passivating interior surfaces of the interior of a chemical vapor deposition reactor | |
EP2007923B1 (en) | Etching process | |
US20070207275A1 (en) | Enhancement of remote plasma source clean for dielectric films | |
WO2007027350A2 (en) | Method of removing surface deposits and passivating interior surfaces of the interior of a chemical vapour deposition (cvd) chamber | |
US20070028943A1 (en) | Method of using sulfur fluoride for removing surface deposits | |
EP1733071A2 (en) | Remote chamber methods for removing surface deposits | |
US20050258137A1 (en) | Remote chamber methods for removing surface deposits | |
US7479191B1 (en) | Method for endpointing CVD chamber cleans following ultra low-k film treatments | |
KR102275996B1 (en) | Hydrofluoroolefin etching gas mixtures | |
US20060144819A1 (en) | Remote chamber methods for removing surface deposits |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20061006 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): DE FR GB IE IT NL |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20070524 |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
RBV | Designated contracting states (corrected) |
Designated state(s): DE FR GB IE IT NL |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN |
|
18D | Application deemed to be withdrawn |
Effective date: 20081126 |