[go: up one dir, main page]

EP1114234B1 - Window blind for decoration and sun protection - Google Patents

Window blind for decoration and sun protection Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1114234B1
EP1114234B1 EP99944928A EP99944928A EP1114234B1 EP 1114234 B1 EP1114234 B1 EP 1114234B1 EP 99944928 A EP99944928 A EP 99944928A EP 99944928 A EP99944928 A EP 99944928A EP 1114234 B1 EP1114234 B1 EP 1114234B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
face
window decoration
window
light
slats
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Revoked
Application number
EP99944928A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1114234A1 (en
Inventor
Marco Johannes Christina Van Amelsvoort
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=26642862&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP1114234(B1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Priority claimed from NL1010110A external-priority patent/NL1010110C2/en
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to EP03077424A priority Critical patent/EP1361332A1/en
Publication of EP1114234A1 publication Critical patent/EP1114234A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1114234B1 publication Critical patent/EP1114234B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Revoked legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E06DOORS, WINDOWS, SHUTTERS, OR ROLLER BLINDS IN GENERAL; LADDERS
    • E06BFIXED OR MOVABLE CLOSURES FOR OPENINGS IN BUILDINGS, VEHICLES, FENCES OR LIKE ENCLOSURES IN GENERAL, e.g. DOORS, WINDOWS, BLINDS, GATES
    • E06B9/00Screening or protective devices for wall or similar openings, with or without operating or securing mechanisms; Closures of similar construction
    • E06B9/24Screens or other constructions affording protection against light, especially against sunshine; Similar screens for privacy or appearance; Slat blinds
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E06DOORS, WINDOWS, SHUTTERS, OR ROLLER BLINDS IN GENERAL; LADDERS
    • E06BFIXED OR MOVABLE CLOSURES FOR OPENINGS IN BUILDINGS, VEHICLES, FENCES OR LIKE ENCLOSURES IN GENERAL, e.g. DOORS, WINDOWS, BLINDS, GATES
    • E06B9/00Screening or protective devices for wall or similar openings, with or without operating or securing mechanisms; Closures of similar construction
    • E06B9/24Screens or other constructions affording protection against light, especially against sunshine; Similar screens for privacy or appearance; Slat blinds
    • E06B2009/2423Combinations of at least two screens
    • E06B2009/2441Screens joined one below the other

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a vertical slatted blind.
  • window decorations are frequently applied in offices where computers are used.
  • the screens of the computers prove to be properly readable only when the incident light from outside is sufficiently subdued.
  • the window decorations know per se can subdue the light sufficiently for rendering a screen positioned at a workplace properly readable.
  • a drawback of the known window decorations is that the use of these decorations is experienced as unpleasant. Tests have shown that persons present in a space in which the windows are provided with the known window decorations will, after a passage of time, start to feel unwell, which may lead to mental and physical strains.
  • the vertical slated blind according to the invention is characterized in that the window decoration, when brought into a condition ready for use, comprises a first face extending in horizontal direction over at least substantially the full width of the window decoration and a second face extending in horizontal direction of the window decoration, wherein the first and the second face are formed by the vertical slats, while to each of said slats it applies that it transmits at least substantially no light for a first portion of the relevant slat, said first portion forming part of the first face, and partially transmits light for a second portion of the relevant slat, said second portion forming part of the second face so that the first face transmitting substantially no light, the second face subduing the incident light in such a manner that a person present at his workplace in an inner space provided with the window decoration can still look outside through the second face, the first face being located above the second face.
  • the screens still prove to be properly readable, in spite of the transmission of a certain amount of light through the second face.
  • the second face extends at least substantially over the full width of the window decoration. This last will be the case in particular when the window decoration itself is approximately as wide as a window or door in front of which the window decoration is located.
  • first and second faces adjoin each other.
  • the second face extends down to a lower side of the window decoration. However, this is not required. Also, it generally applies that the first face extends up to the upper side of the window decoration. However, this is not required either, because at the upper side of the window decoration, there may further be present a face whose properties deviate from those of the first face.
  • first and second faces each have a rectangular shape. (May be horizontal or vertical).
  • reference numeral 1 designates a window decoration/sun protection in the form of a horizontal slatted blind.
  • the slatted blind 1 is mounted on a wall 2 of an inner space 4 containing a workplace 6 with a picture screen 8.
  • the horizontal slatted blind is in use, i.e. the horizontal slatted blind is in its expanded condition.
  • Fig. 2a is a side elevation of the slatted blind.
  • the slatted blind comprises horizontal slats 10, attached in a manner known per se to a horizontal upper box, known per se.
  • Located in the upper box 12 is a mechanism for hoisting and folding-in the window decoration by means of a hoist cord 18.
  • a number of these slats 10.1 of a first type form a face whose width is indicated by an arrow B in the drawing and whose height is indicated by an arrow I in the drawing.
  • a number of slats 10.2 of a second type form a second face whose width is again indicated by the arrow B in the drawing and whose height is indicated by an arrow II in the drawing.
  • the slats 10.1 of the first type are designed so as to transmit at least substantially no light.
  • the slats 10.2 of the second type are of such design that they transmit incident light from outside in subdued form.
  • the slats 10.2 of the second type are perforated in a manner known per se and each comprise a large number of small apertures.
  • the window decoration when brought into a condition ready for use, comprises a first face (B, I) extending in horizontal direction over at least substantially the full width and in this example even over the entire width of the window decoration, and the window decoration in this condition comprises a second face (B, II) extending in horizontal direction of the window decoration, the first face transmitting at least substantially no light, the second face subduing the incident light such that the person present in an inner space at his workplace can still look outside through the second face, the first face being located above the second face.
  • the second face (B, II) extends over at least substantially the full width of the window decoration and in this example even over the entire width. Further, in this case, it applies that the first and the second face adjoin each other. Moreover, the second face extends down to the lower side 14 of the window decoration. In turn, the first face extends up to an upper side 16 of the window decoration. In this example, it also applies that the first face (B, I) is higher than the second face (B, II).
  • the slats 10.1 of the first type can, for instance, be of aluminum, plastic or wooden design. It also applies that the slats of the second type 10.2 may be constructed of the same materials. It is also possible that the slats of the second type 10.2 are manufactured from transparent plastic, in which case perforation is not necessary.
  • a person who is present at the workplace 6 and wishes to read the screen 8 will be able to do so in a proper manner. Due to a combination of the first face, transmitting no light, with the second face which does actually transmit a portion of the light from outside, the total amount of incident light is sufficiently subdued to provide that the screen 8 remains properly readable. At the same time, a person present at the workplace 6 is still able to look outside through the second face (B, II) and distinguish at least some contours of the outside world. In this example, a number of trees 20 are vaguely visible.
  • the window decoration is designed as a pleated blind, comprising a sheet-shaped material pleated in one piece, its appearance will be comparable to Fig. 1.
  • This window decoration comprises an upper box 12 and a lower beam 21, while between the upper box 12 and the lower beam 21, in the (expanded) condition ready for use, there is exclusively located a sheet-shaped material pleated in one piece.
  • this material, pleated in one piece may be built up from different sheets of material.
  • the first face is then formed by a pleated, sheet-shaped material 22 which transmits at least substantially no light (non-transparent or semi-transparent; see Fig. 2b).
  • the second face is formed by a pleated, sheet-shaped material 24 which transmits incident light at least partially.
  • the sheet-shaped first material 22 may, for instance, consist of a cloth having a coating of aluminum applied thereto by vaporization.
  • the second pleated sheet-shaped material may also consist of a transparent cloth.
  • the first and second sheet-shaped materials are directly interconnected and constitute the sheet-shaped material pleated in one piece, in other words: without intermediate beam between the first and second sheet-shaped materials 22, 24 and the like.
  • the connection may consist of a layer of adhesive 25. It is clear that the horizontal slatted blind shown in figs. 1, 2a and 2b does not form part of the invention, bat is useful for understanding it.
  • Fig. 3 shows a first embodiment of a window decoration according to the invention. Parts corresponding to those of the preceding Figures have been provided with the same reference numerals.
  • the window decoration according to Fig. 3 it applies that it is designed as a vertical slatted blind.
  • the first face (B, I) and the second face (B, II) are each formed by the same vertical slats 30.
  • each of these slats that they transmit at least substantially no light for a first portion 32 of the slats located in the first face (B, I) and that these slats comprise a second portion 34 which partially transmits the light, said second portion forming part of the second face (B, II).
  • the above can for instance be realized by manufacturing the slats 30 from aluminum and/or plastic (PVC), while only the lower sides of the slats, i.e. the portion 34 of each of the slats, is perforated.
  • slats which are each manufactured from colored, transparent plastic which partially transmits incident light
  • first portion 32 of each of the slats is provided with a coating that transmits at least substantially no light. Accordingly, the effect is again that the first face (B, I) extends in horizontal direction over the full width of the window decoration and transmits at least substantially no light, and that the second face (B, II) likewise extends in horizontal direction, in this case even over the entire width of the window decoration, the second face subduing the incident light in such a manner that the person present at his workplace in the inner space can still look outside through the second face, the first face being located above the second face.
  • Fig. 4 shows a second embodiment of a window decoration according to the invention which at least substantially corresponds to the window decoration of Fig. 3.
  • the slats are of longer design, to form a third face (B, III).
  • This third face (B, III) can, for instance, have the same properties as the second face (B, II).
  • Each slat 30 then comprises a third portion 34 having the same properties as the portion 32 of the relevant slat.
  • the third face (B, III) has the same properties as the first face (B, I).
  • Each slat 30 then comprises a third portion 36 having the same properties as the portion 22 of the relevant slat.
  • the face (B, III) can, for instance, be located below the window sill and need not be especially partially light-transmitting for creating the possibility of looking outside therethrough. Also if the window extended down to the floor 40, the third face (B, III) may be designed for transmitting no light. Indeed, a person present at his workplace can always look outside to some extent via the second face (B, II). Of course, the third face (B, III) may also have properties regarding light transmission that differ from those of the first and second faces (B, I) and (B, II).
  • the first face and the first face are each of rectangular design.
  • the second face has a shape differing from the rectangle.
  • the vertical slatted blind (Figs. 3, 4) is on one or either side enlarged with additional slats which are entirely or partially transparent and/or non-transparent.
  • the slats may, for instance, be suspended beyond a window in front of a wall and, for instance, exclusively have a decorative function.
  • two or more vertical slatted blinds according to the invention are fitted on one horizontal rail or box 12, for instance for suspending in front of two or more windows.
  • additional slats may then be suspended from the horizontal rail or box 12.
  • These additional slats may again be entirely or partially transparent and/or non-transparent and form again additional window decorations.
  • Such variants are each understood to fall within the framework of the invention, as defined in the appended claims.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Structural Engineering (AREA)
  • Architecture (AREA)
  • Civil Engineering (AREA)
  • Blinds (AREA)
  • Window Of Vehicle (AREA)
  • Wing Frames And Configurations (AREA)
  • Preparation Of Compounds By Using Micro-Organisms (AREA)

Abstract

The invention relates to a window decoration / sun protection such as a horizontal slatted blind, a vertical slatted blind, a roller blind, and a pleated blind. When brought into a condition ready for use, the window decoration comprises a first face extending in horizontal direction over at least substantially the full width of the window decoration. When brought into the condition ready for use, the window decoration further comprises a second face extending in horizontal direction of the window decoration. The first face transmits at least substantially no light. The second face subdues the incident light in such a manner that a person present at his workplace in an inner space provided with the window decoration can still look outside through the second face, the first face being located above the second face. <IMAGE>

Description

  • The invention relates to a vertical slatted blind.
  • Accordingly, such window decorations are frequently applied in offices where computers are used. The screens of the computers prove to be properly readable only when the incident light from outside is sufficiently subdued. As it turns out, the window decorations know per se can subdue the light sufficiently for rendering a screen positioned at a workplace properly readable. However, a drawback of the known window decorations is that the use of these decorations is experienced as unpleasant. Tests have shown that persons present in a space in which the windows are provided with the known window decorations will, after a passage of time, start to feel unwell, which may lead to mental and physical strains.
  • The object of the invention is to provide a solution to the above-outlined problem. To this end, the vertical slated blind according to the invention is characterized in that the window decoration, when brought into a condition ready for use, comprises a first face extending in horizontal direction over at least substantially the full width of the window decoration and a second face extending in horizontal direction of the window decoration, wherein the first and the second face are formed by the vertical slats, while to each of said slats it applies that it transmits at least substantially no light for a first portion of the relevant slat, said first portion forming part of the first face, and partially transmits light for a second portion of the relevant slat, said second portion forming part of the second face so that the first face transmitting substantially no light, the second face subduing the incident light in such a manner that a person present at his workplace in an inner space provided with the window decoration can still look outside through the second face, the first face being located above the second face.
  • As a person can still look outside to a certain extent through the second face and distinguish at least some contours of the outside world, he proves not to feel oppressed any longer. Also when a person stays for a longer period in a space provided with a window decoration according to the invention, it turns out that the above-mentioned physical and mental strains do not occur any longer.
  • Also, the screens still prove to be properly readable, in spite of the transmission of a certain amount of light through the second face. However, this is compensated for by the fact that the first face transmits at least substantially no light, so that the total light transmission of the window decoration is sufficiently low to enable reading the screens properly.
  • Preferably, it applies that the second face extends at least substantially over the full width of the window decoration. This last will be the case in particular when the window decoration itself is approximately as wide as a window or door in front of which the window decoration is located.
  • Further, it applies in particular that the first and second faces adjoin each other.
  • Also, it will generally apply that the second face extends down to a lower side of the window decoration. However, this is not required. Also, it generally applies that the first face extends up to the upper side of the window decoration. However, this is not required either, because at the upper side of the window decoration, there may further be present a face whose properties deviate from those of the first face.
  • In particular, it applies that the first and second faces each have a rectangular shape. (May be horizontal or vertical).
  • The invention will hereinafter be further explained with reference to the accompanying drawings. In these drawings:
  • Fig. 1 shows a horizontal slatted blind and a pleated blind when this blind is fitted at a window of an inner space in which a workplace is located;
  • Fig. 2a is a side elevation of the slatted blind of Fig. 1;
  • Fig. 2b is a side elevation of the pleated blind of Fig. 1;
  • Fig. 3 shows a first embodiment of a vertical slatted blind according to the invention; and
  • Fig. 4 shows a second embodiment of a vertical slatted blind according to the invention. The horizontal slatted blind shown in figs. 1, 2a and 2b does not form part of the invention but represents background art useful for understanding the invention.
  • In Fig. 1, reference numeral 1 designates a window decoration/sun protection in the form of a horizontal slatted blind. The slatted blind 1 is mounted on a wall 2 of an inner space 4 containing a workplace 6 with a picture screen 8.
  • In this example, the horizontal slatted blind is in use, i.e. the horizontal slatted blind is in its expanded condition. Fig. 2a is a side elevation of the slatted blind.
  • The slatted blind comprises horizontal slats 10, attached in a manner known per se to a horizontal upper box, known per se. Located in the upper box 12 is a mechanism for hoisting and folding-in the window decoration by means of a hoist cord 18. A number of these slats 10.1 of a first type form a face whose width is indicated by an arrow B in the drawing and whose height is indicated by an arrow I in the drawing. Further, a number of slats 10.2 of a second type form a second face whose width is again indicated by the arrow B in the drawing and whose height is indicated by an arrow II in the drawing.
  • In this example, the slats 10.1 of the first type are designed so as to transmit at least substantially no light. Further, the slats 10.2 of the second type are of such design that they transmit incident light from outside in subdued form. For this purpose, the slats 10.2 of the second type are perforated in a manner known per se and each comprise a large number of small apertures.
  • As a result, in the apparatus according to Fig. 1, the window decoration, when brought into a condition ready for use, comprises a first face (B, I) extending in horizontal direction over at least substantially the full width and in this example even over the entire width of the window decoration, and the window decoration in this condition comprises a second face (B, II) extending in horizontal direction of the window decoration, the first face transmitting at least substantially no light, the second face subduing the incident light such that the person present in an inner space at his workplace can still look outside through the second face, the first face being located above the second face.
  • In this example, it also applies that the second face (B, II) extends over at least substantially the full width of the window decoration and in this example even over the entire width. Further, in this case, it applies that the first and the second face adjoin each other. Moreover, the second face extends down to the lower side 14 of the window decoration. In turn, the first face extends up to an upper side 16 of the window decoration. In this example, it also applies that the first face (B, I) is higher than the second face (B, II).
  • The slats 10.1 of the first type can, for instance, be of aluminum, plastic or wooden design. It also applies that the slats of the second type 10.2 may be constructed of the same materials. It is also possible that the slats of the second type 10.2 are manufactured from transparent plastic, in which case perforation is not necessary.
  • In the situation as show in Fig. 1, a person who is present at the workplace 6 and wishes to read the screen 8, will be able to do so in a proper manner. Due to a combination of the first face, transmitting no light, with the second face which does actually transmit a portion of the light from outside, the total amount of incident light is sufficiently subdued to provide that the screen 8 remains properly readable. At the same time, a person present at the workplace 6 is still able to look outside through the second face (B, II) and distinguish at least some contours of the outside world. In this example, a number of trees 20 are vaguely visible.
  • If the window decoration is designed as a pleated blind, comprising a sheet-shaped material pleated in one piece, its appearance will be comparable to Fig. 1. This window decoration comprises an upper box 12 and a lower beam 21, while between the upper box 12 and the lower beam 21, in the (expanded) condition ready for use, there is exclusively located a sheet-shaped material pleated in one piece. However, this material, pleated in one piece, may be built up from different sheets of material. The first face is then formed by a pleated, sheet-shaped material 22 which transmits at least substantially no light (non-transparent or semi-transparent; see Fig. 2b). The second face is formed by a pleated, sheet-shaped material 24 which transmits incident light at least partially. The sheet-shaped first material 22 may, for instance, consist of a cloth having a coating of aluminum applied thereto by vaporization. The same holds for the second pleated sheet-shaped material 24, in which, however, a perforation has moreover been provided in the sheet-shaped material, so that a person present at the workplace can still look outside to some extent. The second pleated sheet-shaped material may also consist of a transparent cloth. The first and second sheet-shaped materials are directly interconnected and constitute the sheet-shaped material pleated in one piece, in other words: without intermediate beam between the first and second sheet-shaped materials 22, 24 and the like. The connection may consist of a layer of adhesive 25. It is clear that the horizontal slatted blind shown in figs. 1, 2a and 2b does not form part of the invention, bat is useful for understanding it.
  • Fig. 3 shows a first embodiment of a window decoration according to the invention. Parts corresponding to those of the preceding Figures have been provided with the same reference numerals. In the window decoration according to Fig. 3, it applies that it is designed as a vertical slatted blind. The first face (B, I) and the second face (B, II) are each formed by the same vertical slats 30.
  • Further, it applies to each of these slats that they transmit at least substantially no light for a first portion 32 of the slats located in the first face (B, I) and that these slats comprise a second portion 34 which partially transmits the light, said second portion forming part of the second face (B, II). The above can for instance be realized by manufacturing the slats 30 from aluminum and/or plastic (PVC), while only the lower sides of the slats, i.e. the portion 34 of each of the slats, is perforated. Other variants are slats which are each manufactured from colored, transparent plastic which partially transmits incident light, while it moreover applies that the first portion 32 of each of the slats is provided with a coating that transmits at least substantially no light. Accordingly, the effect is again that the first face (B, I) extends in horizontal direction over the full width of the window decoration and transmits at least substantially no light, and that the second face (B, II) likewise extends in horizontal direction, in this case even over the entire width of the window decoration, the second face subduing the incident light in such a manner that the person present at his workplace in the inner space can still look outside through the second face, the first face being located above the second face.
  • Fig. 4 shows a second embodiment of a window decoration according to the invention which at least substantially corresponds to the window decoration of Fig. 3. In this case, however, the slats are of longer design, to form a third face (B, III). This third face (B, III) can, for instance, have the same properties as the second face (B, II). Each slat 30 then comprises a third portion 34 having the same properties as the portion 32 of the relevant slat. However, it is also possible that the third face (B, III) has the same properties as the first face (B, I). Each slat 30 then comprises a third portion 36 having the same properties as the portion 22 of the relevant slat. The face (B, III) can, for instance, be located below the window sill and need not be especially partially light-transmitting for creating the possibility of looking outside therethrough. Also if the window extended down to the floor 40, the third face (B, III) may be designed for transmitting no light. Indeed, a person present at his workplace can always look outside to some extent via the second face (B, II). Of course, the third face (B, III) may also have properties regarding light transmission that differ from those of the first and second faces (B, I) and (B, II).
  • In the foregoing, the first face and the first face are each of rectangular design. However, it is also conceivable that, for instance, the second face has a shape differing from the rectangle. It is also possible that the vertical slatted blind (Figs. 3, 4) is on one or either side enlarged with additional slats which are entirely or partially transparent and/or non-transparent. The slats may, for instance, be suspended beyond a window in front of a wall and, for instance, exclusively have a decorative function. It is also possible that two or more vertical slatted blinds according to the invention are fitted on one horizontal rail or box 12, for instance for suspending in front of two or more windows. Before an interspace between the windows, additional slats may then be suspended from the horizontal rail or box 12. These additional slats may again be entirely or partially transparent and/or non-transparent and form again additional window decorations. Such variants are each understood to fall within the framework of the invention, as defined in the appended claims.

Claims (9)

  1. A window decoration in the form of a vertical slatted blind, characterized in that the window decoration, when brought into a condition ready for use, comprises a first face extending in horizontal direction over at least substantially the full width of the window decoration and a second face extending in horizontal direction of the window decoration, wherein the first and the second face are formed by the vertical slats, while to each of said slats it applies that it transmits substantially no light for a first portion of the relevant slat, said first portion forming part of the first face, and partially transmits light for a second portion of the relevant slat, said second portion forming part of the second face so that the first face transmitting substantially no light, the second face subduing the incident light in such a manner that a person present at his workplace in an inner space provided with the window decoration can still look outside through the second face, the first face being located above the second face.
  2. A window decoration according to claim 1, characterized in that said second portion is of perforated design.
  3. A window decoration according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that said first portion is of non-perforated design.
  4. A window decoration according to claim 1, 2 or 3, characterized in that the second face extends over at least substantially the full width of the window decoration.
  5. A window decoration according to any one of claims 1-4, characterized in that the first and the second face adjoin each other.
  6. A window decoration according to any one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the second face extends down to a lower side of the window decoration.
  7. A window decoration according to any one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the first face extends up to an upper side of the window decoration.
  8. A window decoration according to any one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the first and the second face each have a rectangular shape.
  9. A window decoration according to any one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the first face is higher than the second face.
EP99944928A 1998-09-16 1999-09-16 Window blind for decoration and sun protection Revoked EP1114234B1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP03077424A EP1361332A1 (en) 1998-09-16 1999-09-16 Window blind for decoration and sun protection

Applications Claiming Priority (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
NL1010110 1998-09-16
NL1010110A NL1010110C2 (en) 1998-09-16 1998-09-16 Decorative sun-screen for window frame - has upper and lower sections with differing finishes and light blocking characteristics
NL1013031 1999-09-13
NL1013031A NL1013031C2 (en) 1998-09-16 1999-09-13 Duolight vertical slat blind.
PCT/NL1999/000577 WO2000015939A1 (en) 1998-09-16 1999-09-16 Window blind for decoration and sun protection

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP03077424A Division EP1361332A1 (en) 1998-09-16 1999-09-16 Window blind for decoration and sun protection

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1114234A1 EP1114234A1 (en) 2001-07-11
EP1114234B1 true EP1114234B1 (en) 2003-11-19

Family

ID=26642862

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP99944928A Revoked EP1114234B1 (en) 1998-09-16 1999-09-16 Window blind for decoration and sun protection
EP03077424A Withdrawn EP1361332A1 (en) 1998-09-16 1999-09-16 Window blind for decoration and sun protection

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP03077424A Withdrawn EP1361332A1 (en) 1998-09-16 1999-09-16 Window blind for decoration and sun protection

Country Status (10)

Country Link
EP (2) EP1114234B1 (en)
AT (1) ATE254714T1 (en)
AU (1) AU5764599A (en)
CA (1) CA2344437A1 (en)
DE (1) DE69912967T2 (en)
DK (1) DK1114234T3 (en)
ES (1) ES2212621T3 (en)
NL (1) NL1013031C2 (en)
PT (1) PT1114234E (en)
WO (1) WO2000015939A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE20105483U1 (en) * 2001-03-29 2001-06-28 Sattler Ag, Graz Sun protection textile
WO2005047636A1 (en) * 2003-11-13 2005-05-26 Jott Australia Pty Ltd. Privacy screen
DE102004036649A1 (en) * 2004-07-28 2006-03-23 Bos Gmbh & Co. Kg Window blind with different light transmission

Family Cites Families (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4621672A (en) * 1985-01-18 1986-11-11 Hsu Pei Shun Mechanism for window blind
US4813468A (en) * 1987-09-08 1989-03-21 Hunter Douglas Inc. Two and three position over-under window shade
US5121783A (en) * 1990-03-21 1992-06-16 Roland Nilsson Window covering apparatus
DE9411372U1 (en) * 1994-07-14 1994-11-03 HĂĽppe Form Sonnenschutz- und Raumtrennsysteme GmbH, 26133 Oldenburg Slat for slatted blinds
DE19537190B4 (en) * 1995-10-06 2004-03-25 Warema Renkhoff Gmbh Vertical blind slat
DE29611374U1 (en) * 1996-06-29 1996-09-05 Warema Renkhoff Gmbh, 97828 Marktheidenfeld Sun protection system

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE69912967T2 (en) 2004-09-02
WO2000015939A1 (en) 2000-03-23
ATE254714T1 (en) 2003-12-15
AU5764599A (en) 2000-04-03
CA2344437A1 (en) 2000-03-23
DE69912967D1 (en) 2003-12-24
DK1114234T3 (en) 2004-03-29
EP1361332A1 (en) 2003-11-12
NL1013031C2 (en) 2000-07-13
PT1114234E (en) 2004-04-30
ES2212621T3 (en) 2004-07-16
EP1114234A1 (en) 2001-07-11

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
AU2018404905C1 (en) Light-blocking fabric and manufacturing method therefor
US4842036A (en) Vertical blind slats, and assemblies and components thereof
KR100712246B1 (en) Method of manufacturing blind fabric of screen blind and fabric of blind
US11208842B2 (en) Multifunctional dual roll blind having roll screen and roll screen used therefore
JP2009160819A (en) Composite sheet for shadow display, shade for lighting equipment, lighting equipment and shoji paper
EP1114234B1 (en) Window blind for decoration and sun protection
US20100101125A1 (en) Multipurpose Advertisement Board
KR20200129542A (en) Multiful blind device
AU2003204663B2 (en) Combination Window Covering
KR102081072B1 (en) Combi blind
DE102005036348A1 (en) Median facade for e.g. multistory building, has window shades made of sheet materials, which are extendible from bottom up or from top down or from sides and are impingeable with light images by light projectors from inside and/or outside
JPH0450794Y2 (en)
NL1010110C2 (en) Decorative sun-screen for window frame - has upper and lower sections with differing finishes and light blocking characteristics
KR200477682Y1 (en) Three dimensions cuttern sheet having both side mesh transmitted light cuttern with band type
DE19855166A1 (en) Window picture
KR101527414B1 (en) Horizontal Angle Adjustable Cloth for Blinds and Blinds Using the same
KR20200014710A (en) Space separating structure
EP1296016B1 (en) Roller shutterbox unit
KR20110004340A (en) Blinds that can be opened and closed laterally
JPS5825119Y2 (en) Shutter slats
KR20120004035A (en) blind
JPH07305448A (en) Window, door, or partition of building
PL231423B1 (en) Filling, preferably for the window shield
EP2208848B1 (en) Screen for a building opening
JP2551329Y2 (en) Architectural shutter

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20010412

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Free format text: AL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SI

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20020409

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20031119

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

PLBQ Unpublished change to opponent data

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OPPO

PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 69912967

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20031224

Kind code of ref document: P

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: HUNTER DOUGLAS INDUSTRIES B.V.

Effective date: 20031119

NLR1 Nl: opposition has been filed with the epo

Opponent name: HUNTER DOUGLAS INDUSTRIES B.V.

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: TRGR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GR

Ref legal event code: EP

Ref document number: 20040400631

Country of ref document: GR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: T3

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: PT

Ref legal event code: SC4A

Free format text: AVAILABILITY OF NATIONAL TRANSLATION

Effective date: 20040219

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: NV

Representative=s name: NOVAGRAAF INTERNATIONAL SA

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2212621

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

PLBQ Unpublished change to opponent data

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OPPO

PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

ET Fr: translation filed
PLAX Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: LECLUYSE N.V.

Effective date: 20040819

Opponent name: HUNTER DOUGLAS INDUSTRIES B.V.

Effective date: 20031119

NLR1 Nl: opposition has been filed with the epo

Opponent name: LECLUYSE N.V.

Opponent name: HUNTER DOUGLAS INDUSTRIES B.V.

PLAS Information related to reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition deleted

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSDOBS3

PLBB Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition received

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS3

PLCK Communication despatched that opposition was rejected

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREJ1

APBP Date of receipt of notice of appeal recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA2O

APAH Appeal reference modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCREFNO

APBP Date of receipt of notice of appeal recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA2O

APBQ Date of receipt of statement of grounds of appeal recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA3O

APAL Date of receipt of statement of grounds of an appeal modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCNOA3O

PLAB Opposition data, opponent's data or that of the opponent's representative modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009299OPPO

R26 Opposition filed (corrected)

Opponent name: LECLUYSE N.V. KORBEL N.V

Effective date: 20040819

Opponent name: HUNTER DOUGLAS INDUSTRIES B.V.

Effective date: 20031119

NLR1 Nl: opposition has been filed with the epo

Opponent name: LECLUYSE N.V. KORBEL N.V

Opponent name: HUNTER DOUGLAS INDUSTRIES B.V.

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20081017

Year of fee payment: 10

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Payment date: 20081013

Year of fee payment: 10

Ref country code: LU

Payment date: 20081013

Year of fee payment: 10

Ref country code: IE

Payment date: 20081017

Year of fee payment: 10

Ref country code: DK

Payment date: 20081013

Year of fee payment: 10

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20081021

Year of fee payment: 10

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Payment date: 20081008

Year of fee payment: 10

Ref country code: FI

Payment date: 20081013

Year of fee payment: 10

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20081006

Year of fee payment: 10

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20081006

Year of fee payment: 10

APBU Appeal procedure closed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA9O

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20081014

Year of fee payment: 10

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 20081114

Year of fee payment: 10

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20081027

Year of fee payment: 10

RDAF Communication despatched that patent is revoked

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREV1

RDAG Patent revoked

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009271

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: PATENT REVOKED

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20081006

Year of fee payment: 10

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

27W Patent revoked

Effective date: 20081204

GBPR Gb: patent revoked under art. 102 of the ep convention designating the uk as contracting state

Effective date: 20081204

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: PT

Ref legal event code: MP4A

Effective date: 20090519

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20081217

Year of fee payment: 10

PLAB Opposition data, opponent's data or that of the opponent's representative modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009299OPPO

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Payment date: 20081014

Year of fee payment: 10

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20081008

Year of fee payment: 10

NLR2 Nl: decision of opposition

Effective date: 20081204

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: ECNC