Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to provide a synergistic stable nitrogenous fertilizer and a preparation method thereof.
In order to achieve the purpose, the invention adopts the technical scheme that:
a synergistic stable nitrogenous fertilizer contains urea, medium-trace elements (Ca, Mg, S, B, Si, Fe and Zn), nitrogen regulating synergist, and carbon source synergist (preferably amino acids). The proportion of the urea, the medium trace elements, the nitrogen regulating synergist and the carbon source (amino acid) is 1:0.3-0.5:0.8-1:0.05-0.1:0.001-0.1:0.1-0.3 in parts by weight.
Dissolving the inhibitor into an organic solvent according to the above measurement, mechanically and uniformly mixing by a stirring pump, dissolving the measured carbon source (gamma-polyglutamic acid) into an aqueous solution, mechanically and uniformly mixing by the stirring pump, adding the two solutions and the phosphorus-potassium fertilizer into urea-urea slurry, and granulating by a common urea production granulating device to obtain the synergistic stable nitrogenous fertilizer with the grain size of 0.85-2.8mm accounting for more than 93%.
Adding a certain amount of carbon source gamma-polyglutamic acid, meeting the requirement that the C/N of the soil is 25:1 after the carbon source gamma-polyglutamic acid is added into the soil, relieving the loss of nitrogen caused by untimely supply of the carbon source, simultaneously fixing the carbon and nitrogen in microorganisms, and slowly releasing the nitrogen by microbial decomposition and clay mineral fixation, thereby meeting the requirement of crops on compound fertilizers in each period of growth. Polyglutamic acid is a water-soluble, biodegradable, non-toxic biopolymer prepared using microbial fermentation. It is a viscous substance, which was first discovered in "natto", a fermented bean. It is a special anionic natural polymer. The compound is prepared by condensing D-type glutamic acid molecules and L-type glutamic acid molecules through amido bonds between alpha-amino groups and gamma-carboxylic acid groups, the molecular weight of the compound is 5000-10000 million daltons, and the structural formula is shown as formula 1:
formula 1 polyglutamic acid structure formula
Polyglutamic acid is a new generation plant nutrition promoter, is used as a high molecular compound, can play a role of an ion pump, can strengthen the absorption of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and trace elements, has biocompatibility and the complexing performance on positive and negative charges, can play a role of a pump, a vehicle and a concentrator, can effectively lock nutrients, improve the effective concentration of the nutrients, reduce the loss of chemical fertilizers, enrich the nutrients, improve the utilization rate of the fertilizers, promote the development of crop root systems and the synthesis of protein and the like, and further achieves the effects of increasing the yield and improving the quality. Meanwhile, the polyglutamic acid is a safe, environment-friendly and hormone-free product, can be degraded into monomer amino acid-glutamic acid, is absorbed and utilized by crops, and is safe, efficient and pollution-free.
The invention has the following advantages:
1. after the synergistic stable nitrogen fertilizer is applied, the compound fertilizer is kept in the soil in the form of ammonium nitrogen for a long time due to the addition of the nitrification inhibitor, thereby avoiding the occurrence of high-amount nitrate nitrogen, reducing the nitrogen loss caused by the leaching and denitrification of nitrogen, improving the utilization rate of the nitrogen fertilizer, promoting the existence of the nitrogen fertilizer in the form of ammonium nitrogen, reducing the time for supplying the nitrogen fertilizer to crops in the form of nitrate nitrogen and nitrite nitrogen, reducing the toxicity of the crops in the seedling stage and enhancing the capability of resisting plant diseases and insect pests.
2. After the synergistic stable nitrogen fertilizer is applied, the requirement of the growth of crops on a carbon source can be met, the type of the added carbon source is gamma-polyglutamic acid, and the gamma-polyglutamic acid has the function of activating phosphorus nutrition while supplementing the carbon source, so that the requirement of the crops on phosphorus is met.
3. After the synergistic stable nitrogen fertilizer is applied, part of fertilizer nitrogen can be stored in soil, and the synergistic stable nitrogen fertilizer simultaneously has a carbon source and a nitrogen source, so that the synergistic stable nitrogen fertilizer is fixed by microorganisms and clay minerals. The microorganism immobilization is mainly realized in the condition that a carbon source is sufficient, the microorganism can simultaneously absorb and utilize the carbon source and the nitrogen source to meet the growth and development of the microorganism, the microorganism is fixedly stored in soil in the form of partial organic nitrogen and is slowly released when crops need. The combination of the two enriches the soil nitrogen reservoir and increases the nitrogen retention. Improving the characteristics of nitrogen reservoirs in soil. On the other hand, the polyglutamic acid has a special molecular structure, so that the polyglutamic acid has strong moisture-retaining capacity, improves the granular structure of the soil, loosens the soil, improves the moisture-retaining and fertilizer-retaining capacity of the soil, has the effects of adjusting the pH value of the soil and reducing the content of heavy metals in the soil, and has a strong adjusting effect on the nutrient supply of the soil.
4. After the synergistic stable nitrogen fertilizer is applied, the nitrogen in soil can be fixed, the utilization rate of the nitrogen fertilizer is improved, the emission of greenhouse gases is reduced, the environmental pollution is reduced, the original phosphorus and potassium in the soil are activated, and particularly, the synergistic effect on potassium is obvious, so that the effects of increasing roots, strengthening seedlings, resisting diseases, resisting lodging, increasing yield and gaining harvest can be achieved.
5. After the synergistic stable nitrogen fertilizer is applied, the fertilizer contains components, has high stability, economy and special adsorption and retention characteristics on nutrients such as nitrogen and the like, and can obviously adsorb NH4 +And inorganic salt ions are added, so that the nitrogen loss in the soil can be reduced, the utilization efficiency of the organic fertilizer is effectively improved, and the fertility of the soil is gradually improved. Meanwhile, due to the porous structure and the large specific surface area, the fertilizer is applied to soil and has the advantages of volume weight, water content, porosity and electricityThe conductivity, the cation exchange capacity, the nutrient condition of the soil and the like can generate direct or indirect influences, so that the microenvironment of the soil is influenced.
6. After the synergistic stable compound fertilizer is applied, the nitrogen regulating synergist (urease inhibitor and nitrification inhibitor) and the gamma-polyglutamic acid are combined to prepare the compound fertilizer synergist, can fully exert the synergistic effect of urease inhibitor and nitrification inhibitor for inhibiting the hydrolysis and transformation of urea nitrogen and the synergistic effect of polyglutamic acid on the nutrient absorption of crops and the enhancement of water retention and fertilizer conservation, can effectively inhibit the hydrolysis of urea and the conversion of urea into nitrate nitrogen, effectively prolong the fertilizer efficiency of the urea nitrogen fertilizer, improve the absorption and utilization effects of crops on nitrogen, increase the absorption of plants on nitrogen, improve the utilization rate of fertilizer, increase the content of protein, amino acid, fat and other nutrient substances in agricultural products, simultaneously activates medium trace elements required by plants in soil, increases the effective enrichment amount of the trace elements required by crops in the soil, and promotes the crops to absorb other nutrient elements.
7. The fertilizer production is carried out by combining a protection chelation process and a multi-stage compression process. The preparation method comprises the steps of combining yeast autolysis and complex enzyme hydrolysis, carrying out biochemical reaction through a multi-stage compression process to prepare an amino acid solution, mixing a trace element solution with the prepared amino acid solution, and carrying out a chelation reaction through a protection chelation process to replace amino acid and trace element by groups on two-position C atoms to generate the amino acid chelated fertilizer. The technological process of producing the fertilizer includes enzyme mother mud → pressure filtration → autolysis → enzymatic hydrolysis → filtration → batching → chelation → cooling → filtration → combination → finished product packaging. The process has mild reaction conditions and is convenient to operate.
The specific implementation mode is as follows:
the present invention will be further described with reference to the following examples.
Example 1:
the synergistic stable nitrogen fertilizer consists of urea, magnesium, urease inhibitor and polyglutamic acid.
Based on 100 parts by weight of urea slurry, 50 parts of calcium superphosphate, 100 parts of potassium sulfate, 8 parts of magnesium, 5 parts of ammonium thiosulfate, methanol having a volume concentration of 37% and capable of dissolving ammonium thiosulfate, and 20 parts of gamma-polyglutamic acid are added.
The preparation method comprises the following steps:
based on 100 parts (kilogram) urea-slurry (molten urea), 5 parts of ammonium thiosulfate is dissolved in 300-500ml (400 ml volume concentration) of 37% methanol (used as a carrier of a slow-release agent) and is fully and uniformly mixed; dissolving 20 parts of gamma-polyglutamic acid in water and uniformly mixing; the two and 8 parts of magnesium are added into urea slurry, and a synergistic stable nitrogen fertilizer with the grain diameter of 0.85-2.8mm which is more than or equal to 90 percent and the nitrogen content of 24 percent is produced by granulation by utilizing a device and a process for producing common granular urea.
Example 2:
the components of the synergistic stable nitrogenous fertilizer comprise urea, sulfur, urease inhibitor, nitrification inhibitor and gamma-polyglutamic acid.
Based on 100 parts by weight (100 kg) of urea slurry, 300 ml (400 ml) of methanol having a volume concentration of 37% and capable of dissolving ammonium thiosulfate and 3, 4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate, 300 parts of sulfur, 2.5 parts of ammonium thiosulfate and 2.5 parts of 3, 4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate, and 20 parts of gamma-polyglutamic acid were added.
The preparation method comprises the following steps:
2.5 parts of ammonium thiosulfate and 2.5 parts of 3, 4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate are dissolved in 300-500ml (400 ml here) of 37% methanol (as a carrier for a sustained release agent) in volume concentration, based on 100 parts of urea-urea slurry (molten urea), and sufficiently mixed; dissolving 20 parts of gamma-polyglutamic acid in water and uniformly mixing; the flow is calculated by a metering pump, the two mixed solutions and 8 parts of sulfur are added into urea slurry, and a synergistic stable nitrogen fertilizer with the grain diameter of 0.85-2.8mm, which is more than or equal to 90 percent and the nitrogen content of 24 percent, is produced by utilizing a device and a process for producing common granular urea.
Example 3:
the components of the synergistic stable nitrogen fertilizer comprise urea, nitrification inhibitor, zinc and gamma-polyglutamic acid.
Based on 100 parts (100 kg) of urea slurry, 7 parts of zinc, 5 parts of 3, 4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate, 37 vol.% methanol capable of dissolving the 3, 4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate, and 20 parts of gamma-polyglutamic acid were added.
The preparation method comprises the following steps:
5 parts of 3, 4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate was dissolved in 500ml (400 ml here) of methanol (as a carrier for a sustained-release agent) having a volume concentration of 37% in 100 parts of urea-urea slurry (molten urea) and sufficiently mixed; dissolving 20 parts of polyglutamic acid in water and uniformly mixing; the flow rate is calculated by a metering pump, the two mixed solutions, 7 parts of zinc, 50 parts of calcium superphosphate and 100 parts of potassium chloride are added into urea slurry, and a synergistic stable nitrogen fertilizer with the grain diameter of 0.85-2.8mm which is more than or equal to 90 percent and the nitrogen content of 24 percent is produced by granulation by utilizing a device and a process for producing common granular urea.
Application example 1:
the synergistic stable nitrogen fertilizer produced according to the example 1 is applied to corn, rice and wheat in a field contrast test, the application time is one-time application of base fertilizer before sowing (corn and wheat) and transplanting (rice), the contrast is common urea treatment, the application amount of the nitrogen fertilizer in the contrast corn plots is reduced to 12 kg/mu of pure nitrogen, the application amount of the rice is reduced to 15 kg/mu of pure nitrogen, and the application amount of the wheat is reduced to 5 kg/mu of pure nitrogen. Application example nitrogen was applied at 80% of control. The fertilizer application time is 5 months and 1 day, the fertilizer application time for the wheat planting plots is 4 months and 15 days, the fertilizer application time for the rice planting plots is 5 months and 20 days, and the obtained field test results are as follows:
unit is mu
Application comparative example 1:
the application comparative example is a field application comparative test of a fertilizer without a carbon-containing synergist and the synergistic stability nitrogen fertilizer. The application time is one-time application of base fertilizer before sowing (corn and wheat) and transplanting (rice), the application amount of the corn plot nitrogen fertilizer is reduced to 12 kg/mu of pure nitrogen, the application amount of the rice is reduced to 15 kg/mu of pure nitrogen, the application amount of the wheat is reduced to 5 kg/mu of pure nitrogen, the application time of the corn planting plot fertilizer is 5 months and 1 day, the application time of the wheat planting plot fertilizer is 4 months and 15 days, and the application time of the rice planting plot is 5 months and 20 days.
The synergistic stable nitrogen fertilizer produced in example 1 was tested in a field comparison with products without carbon synergist (i.e. without polyglutamic acid) and planted as corn, rice and wheat. The ingredients of example 1 include urea, magnesium, ammonium thiosulfate, the urease inhibitor, gamma-polyglutamic acid. Based on 100 parts (100 kg) of urea slurry, 8 parts of magnesium, 5 parts of ammonium thiosulfate, 37 vol.% methanol capable of dissolving ammonium thiosulfate, and 20 parts of gamma-polyglutamic acid were added. The comparative example of example 1 includes urea, magnesium, and the urease inhibitor ammonium thiosulfate. The addition amount of the magnesium sulfate is 8 parts and 5 parts of ammonium thiosulfate based on 100 parts of urea slurry.
The synergistic stable nitrogen fertilizer produced as in example 2 was tested in a field contrast test with products without carbon synergist (i.e. without polyglutamic acid) and crops were corn, rice and wheat; the ingredients of example 2 include urea, sulfur, urease inhibitors, nitrification inhibitors, gamma-polyglutamic acid. Based on 100 parts (100 kg) of urea slurry, 8 parts of sulfur, 2.5 parts of ammonium thiosulfate, 2.5 parts of 3, 4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate, 37 vol.% methanol capable of dissolving the ammonium thiosulfate and the 3, 4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate, and 20 parts of gamma-polyglutamic acid were added. The comparative example of example 2 includes urea, urease inhibitor, nitrification inhibitor. The addition amounts of 8 parts of sulfur, 5 parts of ammonium thiosulfate and 5 parts of 3, 4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate are calculated based on 100 parts of urea slurry.
A field control experiment was conducted on the synergistic stable nitrogen fertilizer produced in example 3, with a product without the addition of a carbon synergist (i.e., without the addition of polyglutamic acid), and the crops grown were corn, rice and wheat the ingredients of example 3 included urea, zinc, nitrification inhibitor, and gamma-polyglutamic acid. The amounts of zinc, 3, 4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate, 37 vol.% methanol capable of dissolving 3, 4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate, and gamma-polyglutamic acid were 7 parts, 5 parts, and 20 parts, based on 100 parts of urea slurry. The comparative example of example 3 includes urea, zinc, nitrification inhibitor. The amount of zinc added was 7 parts and 3, 4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate was 5 parts based on 100 parts of urea slurry.
Test results show that after the synergistic stable nitrogen fertilizer and a corresponding fertilizer product without the carbon synergist are applied to field crops of corn, rice and wheat, the crop yield is remarkably reduced, the mechanism is that the nitrogen is supported to be more firmly fixed in soil after a carbon source is added, the nitrogen is slowly released in the later growth period of the crops for the growth needs of the crops, and the requirements of the later growth period of nutrition and the later reproductive period on the nitrogen are supported.
Field contrast test of synergistic stability of nitrogen fertilizer and fertilizer product without carbon synergist
Application comparative example 2:
and (4) performing a field contrast test when the addition amount of the carbonaceous material is greater than the upper limit of the protection range. The application time is one-time application of base fertilizer before sowing (corn and wheat) and transplanting (rice), the application amount of the corn plot nitrogen fertilizer is reduced to 12 kg/mu of pure nitrogen, the application amount of the rice is reduced to 15 kg/mu of pure nitrogen, the application amount of the wheat is reduced to 5 kg/mu of pure nitrogen, the application time of the corn planting plot fertilizer is 5 months and 1 day, the application time of the wheat planting plot fertilizer is 4 months and 15 days, and the application time of the rice planting plot is 5 months and 20 days.
The synergistic stable nitrogen fertilizer produced according to the example 1 is added with the nitrogen fertilizer, the magnesium and nitrogen regulating synergist and the carbon synergist in a weight ratio of 1:0.5:1:0.08:0.05: the product of 1 is compared with the field application effect, and the components of the example 1 comprise urea, magnesium, urease inhibitor ammonium thiosulfate and gamma-polyglutamic acid. Based on 100 parts (100 kg) of urea slurry, 8 parts of magnesium, 5 parts of ammonium thiosulfate, 37 vol.% methanol capable of dissolving ammonium thiosulfate, and 20 parts of gamma-polyglutamic acid were added. The comparative example of example 1 includes urea, magnesium, and the urease inhibitor ammonium thiosulfate. The addition amount of the additive is calculated by 100 parts of urea pulp, and 8 parts of magnesium, 5 parts of ammonium thiosulfate and 100 parts of gamma-polyglutamic acid are added.
The synergistic stable nitrogen fertilizer produced according to the example 2 is added with the nitrogen fertilizer, the sulfur and nitrogen synergist and the carbon synergist in a weight ratio of 1:0.5:1: 0:08: 0.05: 1, and comparing the field application effect, wherein 0.1 part of biochemical inhibitor comprises 0.05 part of urease inhibitor and 0.05 part of nitrification inhibitor. The ingredients of example 2 included urea, sulfur, the urease inhibitor ammonium thiosulfate, the nitrification inhibitor 3, 4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate, and the carbon source gamma-polyglutamic acid. Based on 100 parts (100 kg) of urea slurry, 8 parts of sulfur, 2.5 parts of ammonium thiosulfate, 2.5 parts of 3, 4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate, 37 vol.% methanol capable of dissolving the ammonium thiosulfate and the 3, 4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate, and 20 parts of gamma-polyglutamic acid were added. The comparative example ingredients of example 2 included urea, sulfur, the urease inhibitor ammonium thiosulfate, the nitrification inhibitor 3, 4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate, and gamma-polyglutamic acid. The addition amount is calculated by 100 parts of urea pulp, 50 parts of 8 parts of sulfur, 2.5 parts of ammonium thiosulfate, 2.5 parts of 3, 4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate and 100 parts of gamma-polyglutamic acid are added.
The synergistic stable nitrogen fertilizer produced according to the example 3 is added with the nitrogen fertilizer, the zinc and nitrogen regulating synergist and the carbon synergist in a weight ratio of 1:0.5:1:0.07:0.05: the product of 1 is compared with the field application effect, and the components of the example 3 comprise urea, zinc, 3, 4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate serving as a nitrification inhibitor and gamma-polyglutamic acid. Based on 100 parts (100 kg) of urea slurry, 7 parts of zinc, 5 parts of 3, 4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate, 37 vol.% methanol having a solubility of 3, 4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate, and 20 parts of gamma-polyglutamic acid were added. The comparative example of example 3 includes urea, zinc, nitrification inhibitor 3, 4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate, and gamma-polyglutamic acid. The addition amounts of the zinc, 3, 4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate and gamma-polyglutamic acid are 7 parts by weight, 5 parts by weight and 100 parts by weight based on 100 parts of urea slurry.
In this case, the amount of carbon source added exceeds the range of protection. The increase of carbon is found to increase the demand of microorganisms on nitrogen, so that the competition of microorganisms on nitrogen in soil is caused, the absorption and utilization of nitrogen by crops are influenced, and the yield of crops is reduced.
Field contrast test of fertilizer product with synergistic stability and addition of nitrogen fertilizer and carbon synergist exceeding upper protection limit
Application comparative example 3:
and (4) performing field comparison test when the addition amount of the carbon-containing synergist is lower than the protection range. The application time is one-time application of base fertilizer before sowing (corn and wheat) and transplanting (rice), the application amount of the corn plot nitrogen fertilizer is reduced to 12 kg/mu of pure nitrogen, the application amount of the rice is reduced to 15 kg/mu of pure nitrogen, and the application amount of the wheat is reduced to 5 kg/mu of pure nitrogen. The fertilizer application time for planting the corn plots is 5 months and 1 day, the fertilizer application time for planting the wheat plots is 4 months and 15 days, and the fertilizer application time for planting the rice plots is 5 months and 20 days.
The synergistic stable nitrogen fertilizer produced in example 1 was subjected to a field control test with a control product in which a nitrogen fertilizer, a magnesium and nitrogen adjusting synergist and a carbon synergist were added in a weight ratio of 1:0.5:1:0.08:0.05:0.01, and crops of corn, rice and wheat were planted. The ingredients of example 1 include urea, calcium superphosphate, potassium sulfate, magnesium, urease inhibitor ammonium thiosulfate, and gamma-polyglutamic acid. Based on 100 parts (100 kg) of urea slurry, 8 parts of magnesium, 5 parts of ammonium thiosulfate, 37 vol.% methanol capable of dissolving ammonium thiosulfate, and 20 parts of gamma-polyglutamic acid were added. The comparative example of example 1 included urea, magnesium, the urease inhibitor ammonium thiosulfate, gamma-polyglutamic acid. The addition amount of the additive is calculated by 100 parts of urea pulp, 8 parts of magnesium, 5 parts of ammonium thiosulfate and 1 part of gamma-polyglutamic acid are added.
The synergistic stable nitrogen fertilizer produced in example 2 was subjected to a field comparison test with a comparison product in which a nitrogen fertilizer, a sulfur and nitrogen regulating synergist and a carbon synergist were added in a weight ratio of 1:0.5:1:0.08:0.05:0.01, and crops of corn, rice and wheat were planted. 0.05 part of biochemical inhibitor comprises 0.025 part of ammonium thiosulfate and 0.025 part of 3, 4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate. The ingredients of example 2 include urea, sulfur, ammonium thiosulfate, 3, 4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate, a nitrification inhibitor, and gamma-polyglutamic acid. Based on 100 parts (100 kg) of urea slurry, 8 parts of sulfur, 2.5 parts of ammonium thiosulfate, 2.5 parts of 3, 4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate, 37 vol.% methanol capable of dissolving the ammonium thiosulfate and the 3, 4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate, and 20 parts of gamma-polyglutamic acid were added. The comparative example of example 2 included urea, triple superphosphate, potassium chloride, sulfur, the urease inhibitor ammonium thiosulfate, the nitrification inhibitor 3, 4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate, gamma-polyglutamic acid. The addition amount is calculated by 100 parts of urea slurry, 50 parts of calcium superphosphate, 100 parts of potassium chloride, 8 parts of sulfur, 2.5 parts of ammonium thiosulfate, 2.5 parts of 3, 4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate and 1 part of gamma-polyglutamic acid are added.
The synergistic stable nitrogen fertilizer produced in example 3 was subjected to a field control test with a control product in which a nitrogen fertilizer, a zinc and nitrogen adjusting synergist and a carbon synergist were added in a weight ratio of 1:0.5:1:0.07:0.05:0.01, and crops of corn, rice and wheat were planted. The components of example 3 include urea, zinc, nitrification inhibitor, gamma-polyglutamic acid. The amounts of zinc, 3, 4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate, 37 vol.% methanol capable of dissolving 3, 4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate, and gamma-polyglutamic acid were 7 parts, 5 parts, and 20 parts, based on 100 parts of urea slurry. The comparative example of example 3 includes urea, zinc, gamma-polyglutamic acid. The addition amounts of zinc, 3, 4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate and gamma-polyglutamic acid were 7 parts, 5 parts and 1 part, based on 100 parts of urea-urea slurry.
Test results show that after the carbon-nitrogen coupled compound fertilizer and a fertilizer product with the corresponding carbon source addition ratio lower than the lower limit of the protection range are applied to field crops of corn, rice and wheat, the crop yield is remarkably reduced, and the sufficient addition of the carbon source is a necessary condition for ensuring the crop yield.
Field contrast test of fertilizer products with synergistic stability when adding amount of compound fertilizer and carbon synergist is lower than lower limit of protection range
Application comparative example 4:
field control trials in the absence of added nitrogen-modulating synergist. The application time is one-time application of base fertilizer before sowing (corn and wheat) and transplanting (rice), the application amount of the corn plot nitrogen fertilizer is reduced to 12 kg/mu of pure nitrogen, the application amount of the rice is reduced to 15 kg/mu of pure nitrogen, and the application amount of the wheat is reduced to 5 kg/mu of pure nitrogen. The fertilizer application time for planting the corn plots is 5 months and 1 day, the fertilizer application time for planting the wheat plots is 4 months and 15 days, and the fertilizer application time for planting the rice plots is 5 months and 20 days.
The synergistic stable nitrogen fertilizer produced in example 1 was subjected to a field control test with a control product in which a nitrogen fertilizer, a magnesium and nitrogen adjusting synergist and a carbon synergist were added in a weight ratio of 1:0.5:1:0.08:0:0.2, and crops of corn, rice and wheat were planted. The composition of example 1 includes urea, magnesium, and gamma-polyglutamic acid. Based on 100 parts (100 kg) of urea slurry, 8 parts of magnesium, 5 parts of ammonium thiosulfate, 37 vol.% methanol capable of dissolving ammonium thiosulfate, and 20 parts of gamma-polyglutamic acid were added. The comparative example of example 1 includes urea, magnesium, gamma-polyglutamic acid. The addition amount of the magnesium is 8 parts and 20 parts of gamma-polyglutamic acid are calculated by 100 parts of urea slurry.
The synergistic stable nitrogen fertilizer produced in example 2 was subjected to a field comparison test with a comparative product in which a nitrogen fertilizer, a sulfur and nitrogen adjusting synergist and a carbon synergist were added in a weight ratio of 1:0.5:1:0.08:0:0.2, and crops of corn, rice and wheat were planted. The ingredients of example 2 include urea, sulfur, ammonium thiosulfate, 3, 4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate, a nitrification inhibitor, and gamma-polyglutamic acid. Based on 100 parts (100 kg) of urea slurry, 8 parts of sulfur, 2.5 parts of ammonium thiosulfate, 2.5 parts of 3, 4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate, 37 vol.% methanol capable of dissolving the ammonium thiosulfate and the 3, 4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate, and 20 parts of gamma-polyglutamic acid were added. The comparative example of example 2 includes urea sulfur, gamma-polyglutamic acid. The addition amount of the additive is calculated by 100 parts of urea pulp, 8 parts of sulfur and 20 parts of gamma-polyglutamic acid are added.
The synergistic stable nitrogen fertilizer produced in example 3 was subjected to a field comparison test with a comparative product in which a nitrogen fertilizer zinc, a nitrogen adjusting synergist and a carbon synergist were added in a weight ratio of 1:0.5:1:0.07:0:0.2, and crops of corn, rice and wheat were planted. The components of example 3 include urea, zinc, nitrification inhibitor, gamma-polyglutamic acid. The amounts of zinc, 3, 4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate, 37 vol.% methanol capable of dissolving 3, 4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate, and gamma-polyglutamic acid were 7 parts, 5 parts, and 20 parts, based on 100 parts of urea slurry. The comparative example of example 3 includes zinc urea, carbon synergist. The adding amount is calculated by 100 parts of urea pulp, 7 parts of zinc and 20 parts of gamma-polyglutamic acid are added.
The test result shows that the carbon-nitrogen coupling nitrogen fertilizer disclosed by the patent and a corresponding product without an inhibitor are subjected to a comparative test on field crops of corn, rice and wheat, and then the crop yield is reduced, so that the product has the advantage of effective matching of carbon and nitrogen, and nitrogen cannot be effectively regulated and controlled under the condition that the inhibitor is not added, and the carbon source loses the adding significance.
Field contrast test of synergistic stability nitrogen fertilizer and fertilizer product without inhibitor
Comparative application example 5
And (4) performing field contrast test when the addition amount of the nitrogen regulating synergist is larger than the upper limit of the protection range. The application time is one-time application of base fertilizer before sowing (corn and wheat) and transplanting (rice), the application amount of the corn plot nitrogen fertilizer is reduced to 12 kg/mu of pure nitrogen, the application amount of the rice is reduced to 15 kg/mu of pure nitrogen, and the application amount of the wheat is reduced to 5 kg/mu of pure nitrogen. The fertilizer application time for planting the corn plots is 5 months and 1 day, the fertilizer application time for planting the wheat plots is 4 months and 15 days, and the fertilizer application time for planting the rice plots is 5 months and 20 days.
The synergistic stable nitrogen fertilizer produced in example 1 was subjected to a field comparison test with a comparison product in which nitrogen fertilizer magnesium, nitrogen adjusting synergist and carbon synergist were added in a weight ratio of 1:0.5:1:0.08:0.2:0.2, and crops of corn, rice and wheat were planted. The ingredients of example 1 include urea, ammonium thiosulfate, a urease inhibitor, and gamma-polyglutamic acid. Based on 100 parts (100 kg) of urea slurry, 8 parts of magnesium, 5 parts of ammonium thiosulfate, 37 vol.% methanol capable of dissolving ammonium thiosulfate, and 20 parts of gamma-polyglutamic acid were added. The comparative example of example 1 includes 8 parts of urea, magnesium, ammonium thiosulfate, gamma-polyglutamic acid. The addition amount of the additive is calculated by 100 parts of urea pulp, 8 parts of magnesium, 20 parts of ammonium thiosulfate and 20 parts of gamma-polyglutamic acid are added.
The synergistic stable nitrogen fertilizer produced in example 2 was subjected to a field comparison test with a comparison product in which a nitrogen fertilizer, a sulfur and nitrogen regulating synergist and a carbon synergist were added in a weight ratio of 1:0.5:1:0.08:0.2:0.2, and crops of corn, rice and wheat were planted. 0.2 part of biochemical inhibitor comprises 0.1 part of urease inhibitor ammonium thiosulfate and 0.1 part of nitrification inhibitor 3, 4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate. The ingredients of example 2 include urea, sulfur, ammonium thiosulfate, 3, 4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate, a nitrification inhibitor, and gamma-polyglutamic acid. Based on 100 parts (100 kg) of urea slurry, 8 parts of sulfur, 2.5 parts of ammonium thiosulfate, 2.5 parts of 3, 4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate, 37 vol.% methanol capable of dissolving the ammonium thiosulfate and the 3, 4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate, and 20 parts of gamma-polyglutamic acid were added. The comparative example of example 2 contains urea, sulfur, the urease inhibitor ammonium thiosulfate, the nitrification inhibitor 3, 4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate, gamma-polyglutamic acid. The addition amount of the urea is calculated by 100 parts of urea pulp, and 8 parts of sulfur, 10 parts of urease inhibitor ammonium thiosulfate, 10 parts of nitrification inhibitor 3, 4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate and 20 parts of gamma-polyglutamic acid are added.
The synergistic stable nitrogen fertilizer produced in example 3 was subjected to a field control test with a control product in which a nitrogen fertilizer, a zinc and nitrogen adjusting synergist and a carbon synergist were added in a weight ratio of 1:0.5:1:0.07:0.2:0.2, and crops of corn, rice and wheat were planted. The components of example 3 include urea, zinc, nitrification inhibitor, gamma-polyglutamic acid. The amounts of zinc, 3, 4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate, 37 vol.% methanol capable of dissolving 3, 4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate, and 20 parts of gamma-polyglutamic acid were added in an amount of 7 parts per 100 parts of urea slurry. The comparative example of example 3 comprises urea, zinc, nitrification inhibitor and gamma-polyglutamic acid, and the addition amounts of zinc, nitrification inhibitor 3, 4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate and gamma-polyglutamic acid are 7 parts, 20 parts and 20 parts based on 100 parts of urea slurry.
Under the condition that the addition amount of the inhibitor exceeds the upper limit of the protection range, the crop yield is not obviously changed, the addition amount of the inhibitor in the protection range is the optimal addition amount, and if the addition amount exceeds the protection range, unnecessary production cost is increased.
Field contrast test of fertilizer products with synergistic stability of nitrogen fertilizer and inhibitor added in amounts exceeding upper limit of protection range
Comparative application example 6
And (4) performing field comparison test when the addition amount of the nitrogen regulation synergist is lower than the lower limit of the protection range. The application time is one-time application of base fertilizer before sowing (corn and wheat) and transplanting (rice), the application amount of the corn plot nitrogen fertilizer is reduced to 12 kg/mu of pure nitrogen, the application amount of the rice is reduced to 15 kg/mu of pure nitrogen, and the application amount of the wheat is reduced to 5 kg/mu of pure nitrogen. The fertilizer application time for planting the corn plots is 5 months and 1 day, the fertilizer application time for planting the wheat plots is 4 months and 15 days, and the fertilizer application time for planting the rice plots is 5 months and 20 days.
The synergistic stable nitrogen fertilizer produced in example 1 was subjected to a field control test with a control product in which a nitrogen fertilizer, a magnesium and nitrogen adjusting synergist and a carbon synergist were added in a weight ratio of 1:0.5:1:0.08:0.0005:0.2, and crops of corn, rice and wheat were planted. The ingredients of example 1 include urea, magnesium, ammonium thiosulfate, the urease inhibitor, gamma-polyglutamic acid. Based on 100 parts (100 kg) of urea slurry, 8 parts of magnesium, 5 parts of ammonium thiosulfate, 37 vol.% methanol capable of dissolving ammonium thiosulfate, and 20 parts of gamma-polyglutamic acid were added. The comparative example of example 1 included urea, magnesium, the urease inhibitor ammonium thiosulfate, gamma-polyglutamic acid. The addition amount of the additive is calculated by 100 parts of urea pulp, 8 parts of magnesium, 0.05 part of ammonium thiosulfate and 20 parts of gamma-polyglutamic acid are added. The synergistic stable nitrogen fertilizer produced in example 2 was subjected to a field control test with a control product in which nitrogen fertilizer, sulfur and nitrogen adjusting synergists and carbon synergists were added in a weight ratio of 1:0.5:1:0.08:0.0005:0.2, and crops of corn, rice and wheat were planted. 0.0005 parts of biochemical inhibitor comprises 0.00025 parts of urease inhibitor and 0.00025 parts of nitrification inhibitor. The ingredients of example 2 include urea, sulfur, ammonium thiosulfate, 3, 4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate, a nitrification inhibitor, and gamma-polyglutamic acid. Based on 100 parts (100 kg) of urea slurry, 8 parts of sulfur, 2.5 parts of ammonium thiosulfate, 2.5 parts of 3, 4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate, 37 vol.% methanol capable of dissolving the ammonium thiosulfate and the 3, 4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate, and 20 parts of gamma-polyglutamic acid were added. The comparative example of example 2 contains urea, sulfur, the urease inhibitor ammonium thiosulfate, the nitrification inhibitor 3, 4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate, gamma-polyglutamic acid. The addition amount of the additive is calculated by 100 parts of urea pulp, 8 parts of sulfur, 0.025 part of ammonium thiosulfate of urease inhibitor, 0.025 part of 3, 4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate of nitrification inhibitor and 20 parts of gamma-polyglutamic acid are added.
The synergistic stable nitrogen fertilizer produced in example 3 was subjected to a field control test with a control product in which nitrogen fertilizer, zinc, nitrogen-adjusting synergist, and carbon synergist were added in a weight ratio of 1:0.5:1:0.07:0.0005:0.2, and crops of corn, rice, and wheat were planted. The components of example 3 include urea, zinc, nitrification inhibitor, gamma-polyglutamic acid. The amounts of zinc, 3, 4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate, 37 vol.% methanol capable of dissolving 3, 4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate, and gamma-polyglutamic acid were 7 parts, 5 parts, and 20 parts, based on 100 parts of urea slurry. The comparative example of example 3 comprises urea, zinc, nitrification inhibitor and gamma-polyglutamic acid, and the addition amounts of zinc, nitrification inhibitor 3, 4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate and gamma-polyglutamic acid are 7 parts, 0.05 part and 20 parts based on 100 parts of urea slurry.
Application comparative example 7
In the comparative example, materials outside the protection range are selected, and field test comparison tests verify that the application amount of corn is reduced to 12 kg/mu of pure nitrogen, the application amount of rice is reduced to 15 kg/mu of pure nitrogen, and the application amount of wheat is reduced to 5 kg/mu of pure nitrogen. The application time is that base fertilizer is applied once before sowing (corn and wheat) and transplanting (rice), the fertilizer application time is 5 months and 1 day, the fertilizer application time is 4 months and 15 days, and the fertilizer application time is 5 months and 20 days.
The nitrogen regulation synergist is selected from n-butyl thiophosphoryl triamide and 3, 5-dimethylpyrazole, the carbon synergist is selected from L-polyglutamic acid, the n-butyl thiophosphoryl triamide and the 3, 5-dimethylpyrazole are classical urease inhibitors and nitrification inhibitors, a large number of field experiments prove that the n-butyl thiophosphoryl triamide and the 3, 5-dimethylpyrazole have good urease inhibition and nitrification inhibition effects, and the nitrogen regulation synergist and the carbon synergist are combined for use in the comparative example. The L-polyglutamic acid is an isomer of the carbon-containing material gamma-polyglutamic acid, and is formed by condensing glutamic acid monomers in different combination forms. The field test result of the comparative example shows that when the carbon synergist is changed into the L-polyglutamic acid, the soil nitrogen retention amount is obviously reduced, and the soil nitrogen retention amount is expressed in the overground part, so that the crop yield is also obviously reduced. In this experiment, the product composition compared with that of example 1 was 100 parts of urea, 8 parts of magnesium, 5 parts of N-N-butyl thiophosphoric triamide and 20 parts of L-polyglutamic acid; the product composition compared with that of example 2 was 100 parts of urea, 8 parts of sulfur, 2.5 parts of N-N-butylthiophosphoric triamide, 2.5 parts of 3, 5-dimethylpyrazole and 20 parts of L-polyglutamic acid; the product composition compared with that of example 3 was 100 parts of urea, 7 parts of zinc, 5 parts of 3, 5-dimethylpyrazole and 20 parts of L-polyglutamic acid. The results of comparative experiment 7 show that the intended function cannot be performed when substances other than the carbonaceous material described in the present application are used, and that the key point of the product described in the present application is the interaction of the nitrogen source, the nitrogen-regulating synergist and the carbonaceous synergist in the soil.
Comparative field trials using non-protected ranges of nitrogen-modulating synergists and carbon synergists
The above description is only for the purpose of illustrating the preferred embodiments of the present invention and is not to be construed as limiting the invention, and any modifications, equivalents and improvements made within the spirit and principle of the present invention are intended to be included therein.