[go: up one dir, main page]

CN110806295A - Method for confirming ratio of structural part deformation and actual deformation calculated based on software - Google Patents

Method for confirming ratio of structural part deformation and actual deformation calculated based on software Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN110806295A
CN110806295A CN201911114531.2A CN201911114531A CN110806295A CN 110806295 A CN110806295 A CN 110806295A CN 201911114531 A CN201911114531 A CN 201911114531A CN 110806295 A CN110806295 A CN 110806295A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
deformation
selecting
bracket
ratio
software
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
CN201911114531.2A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN110806295B (en
Inventor
计然
张新主
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Shandong Ruisiman Intelligent Technology Co.,Ltd.
Shanghai Value Automation Technology Co ltd
Original Assignee
Shandong Varu Intelligent Polytron Technologies Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Shandong Varu Intelligent Polytron Technologies Inc filed Critical Shandong Varu Intelligent Polytron Technologies Inc
Priority to CN201911114531.2A priority Critical patent/CN110806295B/en
Publication of CN110806295A publication Critical patent/CN110806295A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN110806295B publication Critical patent/CN110806295B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01MTESTING STATIC OR DYNAMIC BALANCE OF MACHINES OR STRUCTURES; TESTING OF STRUCTURES OR APPARATUS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G01M5/00Investigating the elasticity of structures, e.g. deflection of bridges or air-craft wings
    • G01M5/0041Investigating the elasticity of structures, e.g. deflection of bridges or air-craft wings by determining deflection or stress
    • G01M5/005Investigating the elasticity of structures, e.g. deflection of bridges or air-craft wings by determining deflection or stress by means of external apparatus, e.g. test benches or portable test systems

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Aviation & Aerospace Engineering (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Investigating Strength Of Materials By Application Of Mechanical Stress (AREA)

Abstract

The invention discloses a method for confirming the ratio of the deformation of a software-based calculation structural part to the actual deformation, which comprises the following steps: theoretically calculating the amount of deformation Δ1A value; measuring the actual measured deformation Δ2(ii) a Calculating the ratio I of the deformation1=Δ21(ii) a The bracket is rectified once to calculate the ratio I2Taking the average of the two ratios
Figure DDA0002273704270000011
Namely, the ratio of the deformation of the structural member to the actual deformation is calculated based on software. The invention has the beneficial effects that: the determined ratio is suitable for other occasions with higher rigidity and strength to the designed structural member, provides support for the theoretical calculation deformation of mechanical design and practical data, and can avoid the defects of rigidity and strength design; the experimental principle is simple and easy to operate, and can be pushedThe method is widely applied to practice checking of rigidity and strength of structural parts in other batch products; in order to prolong the service life of the structural member, improve the stability of equipment and avoid design waste, better basic data support is provided.

Description

Method for confirming ratio of structural part deformation and actual deformation calculated based on software
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of mechanical design, in particular to a method for confirming the ratio of the deformation of a structural part calculated based on software to the actual deformation.
Background
In mechanical design, in many cases, engineers know the control range of the deformation of the designed structural member and how to calculate the value of the theoretical deformation of the structural member through a stress analysis function by using three-dimensional design software, but the value of the theoretical deformation does not represent the actual deformation value of the structural member. The problem of how much the actual deflection differs from the deflection required by the design has been troubling many mechanical design engineers. Many non-standard machines are designed into fruits and are designed once, and the conditions that after the design is firstly verified, the initial requirements of the design are not met, and the fruits and the vegetables are put into use through improved design are not met. Once the deformation of the designed structural member does not meet the design requirements, the inherent design defects such as abnormal sound of running components, potential safety hazards of equipment, short service life of the structural member and the like can occur.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to overcome the defects of the prior art and provide a method for confirming the ratio of the deformation of a structural part calculated based on software to the actual deformation, which meets the parameter setting under the same condition and ensures that the theoretical design value of the deformation meets the design requirement.
The purpose of the invention is realized by the following technical scheme: the method for confirming the ratio of the deformation of the structural part to the actual deformation based on software calculation comprises the following steps:
s1, theoretically calculating the deformation amount delta1The value: modeling a structural member bracket through solidworks software, opening a simulation plug-in command, respectively setting various parameters for the bracket according to actual load conditions, and running the commands such as the calculation example through gridding to obtain the theoretical deformation delta of the bracket1
S2, processing the bracket into a real object according to the digital model of the bracket;
s3, preparing materials such as a load sample, a bracket, a support frame, a dial indicator measuring tool and the like;
s4, sequentially placing the brackets on the support frame by adopting a travelling crane, placing the load sample on the brackets, respectively measuring the difference value of the reading data of the dial indicator as the maximum actual deformation P of the brackets when the load sample is hoisted and placed at the front and the rear of the brackets by using the dial indicatorΔ2Measuring the deformation of the bracket three times respectively because the deformation of the bracket belongs to elastic deformation, and taking the average value of the three read valuesOrder to
S5: according to the actual measured deformation quantity delta2Theoretically calculated deformation quantity delta of structural member1And calculating the ratio I of the deformation1=Δ21
S6: the bracket is once modified, and the ratio I is calculated according to the steps from S1 to S52Taking the average value of the two ratios I, and making I equal to I. The ratio I of the deformation of the structural member to the actual deformation, i.e. the requirement I delta, calculated on the basis of software is obtained1The deformation delta not greater than the design requirement can meet the design requirement.
Optionally, the modification includes adjusting a bracket structure, a size, a material parameter, a load parameter, and the like.
Optionally, the solidworks software is solidworks2014 software.
Optionally, the step S1 includes the following operations:
modeling the structure carrier through solidworks2014, opening the simulation plug-in command in solidworks2014 version, clicking "examples advisor", selecting "new examples" in the drop-down menu, selecting "static stress analysis" in the type, naming "static stress analysis 1";
right clicking the 'part', selecting an 'application material to all' commands, and selecting a 'common carbon steel' material in 'solid works materials';
right-clicking 'link', selecting 'part touch' command, touching type column, selecting 'joint' from dialog box; a parts column, to select "global touch"; the option column selects the 'compatible grid', and finally clicks the 'V' at the upper left corner to finish the item;
right-clicking the 'clamp', selecting a 'fixed geometry' command, selecting 'fixed geometry' from a dialog box, and selecting a contact surface of the fixed geometry in a digital model;
right-clicking the 'external load', selecting a 'gravitation' command, selecting a reference plane in a digital mode from a dialog box, and confirming the direction of the gravitation in the dialog box;
establishing a coordinate system 1 coincident with the gravity center position of the load sample piece according to the gravity center position of the load sample piece; right click "external load", select "remote load/mass" command, from dialog, type column, select "load (direct transfer)"; referring to the coordinate system column, selecting 'user definition' and selecting the established coordinate system 1 in the digital analogy; filling the gravity center distance value into a Y value according to the gravity center parameter and the position column item of the load sample piece: 1500, force column item, Y direction input 59000, confirm the direction of the good force;
right clicking 'grid', selecting 'generating grid' command, moving an arrow to the rightmost 'good' end by a mouse from a grid density column item in a dialog box, and clicking 'check square' at the upper left corner to finish the item; the generated grid;
clicking the upper toolbar to run the example, checking the displacement 1 in the result, and clicking the detection command in the pull-down menu of the graphic tool to measure the deformation value delta of the dark red area1
The invention has the following advantages:
the method calculates the ratio of the deformation of the structural member to the actual deformation based on software, and meets the parameter setting under the same condition, so that the theoretical design value of the deformation meets the design requirement. Specifically, the deformation of the structural member is calculated through a simulation theory in solidworks software, and the actual deformation is measured through physical verification, so that the ratio of the simulation theoretical calculation value to the actual deformation in solidworks is obtained. The ratio determined by the method is suitable for other occasions with higher rigidity and strength to the designed structural part and is used for theoretical reference of designers.
The deformation is calculated for the theory of mechanical design, the support of practical data is provided, and the defects of rigidity and strength design can be avoided; the experimental principle is simple and easy to implement, and the method can be popularized and used for practical checking of rigidity and strength of structural parts in other batch products; in order to prolong the service life of the structural member, improve the stability of equipment and avoid design waste, better basic data support is provided.
Drawings
Fig. 1 is a schematic structural diagram of a bracket according to an embodiment of the present invention.
Fig. 2 is a front view of the bracket shown in fig. 1.
Fig. 3 is a top view of the bracket shown in fig. 1.
Fig. 4 is a schematic view of the structure in the direction a in fig. 3.
Fig. 5-15 are schematic diagrams illustrating an embodiment of the operation of step S1.
Fig. 16 is a schematic structural diagram of a modified bracket according to an embodiment of the present invention.
Fig. 17 is a schematic view of the carriage shown in fig. 16 subjected to step S1.
Fig. 18 is a schematic diagram illustrating an embodiment of the operation in step S4.
Detailed Description
The invention is further described with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
the method for confirming the ratio of the deformation of the structural part to the actual deformation based on software calculation comprises the following steps:
s1, theoretically calculating the deformation amount delta1The value: modeling a structural member bracket through solidworks software, opening a simulation plug-in command, respectively setting various parameters for the bracket according to actual load conditions, and running the commands such as the calculation example through gridding to obtain the theoretical deformation delta of the bracket1
S2, processing the bracket into a real object according to the digital model of the bracket;
s3, preparing materials such as a load sample, a bracket, a support frame, a dial indicator measuring tool and the like;
s4, sequentially placing the bracket on the support frame by adopting a travelling crane, placing the load sample on the bracket, and respectively measuring the hoisting of the load sample before and after the load sample is placed on the bracket by using a dial indicatorThe difference value of the reading data of the dial indicator is the maximum actual deformation P of the bracketΔ2Measuring the deformation of the bracket three times respectively because the deformation of the bracket belongs to elastic deformation, and taking the average value of the three read valuesOrder to
Figure BDA0002273704250000032
S5: according to the actual measured deformation quantity delta2Theoretically calculated deformation quantity delta of structural member1And calculating the ratio I of the deformation1=Δ21
S6: the bracket is once modified, and the ratio I is calculated according to the steps from S1 to S52Taking the average value of the two ratios I, and making I equal to I. The ratio of the deformation of the structural member to the actual deformation, i.e. the requirement I delta, is calculated based on software1The deformation delta not greater than the design requirement can meet the design requirement.
Optionally, the modification includes adjusting a bracket structure, a size, a material parameter, a load parameter, and the like.
Optionally, the solidworks software is solidworks2014 software. The following describes the operation steps of the present invention in further detail by taking solidworks2014 software as an example:
modeling the structural member bracket through solidworks2014, and machining 1 part into a real object according to the numerical model of the bracket in a ratio of 1: 1.
As shown in FIG. 5, open the simulation plug-in command in the solidworks2014 version, click "calculation advisor", select "New calculation" in the drop-down menu, select "static stress analysis" in the type, named "static stress analysis 1";
as shown in fig. 6, right-clicking the "part", selecting the "apply material to all" commands, and selecting the "plain carbon steel" material in the "solidworks materials";
as shown in fig. 7 to 8, right clicking "join" selects the "parts touch" command, and from the dialog box, touching the type field, selects "join"; a parts column, to select "global touch"; the option column selects the 'compatible grid', and finally clicks the 'V' at the upper left corner to finish the item;
as shown in fig. 9, right-clicking on the "fixture", selecting the "fixed geometry" command, selecting the "fixed geometry" from the dialog box, and selecting the four contact surfaces of the fixed geometry in the digital model;
as shown in fig. 10, right-clicking on "external load", selecting the "gravitation" command, selecting a reference plane in several modules from a dialog box, and confirming the direction of the gravitation in the dialog box;
as shown in fig. 11, a coordinate system 1 coinciding with the center of gravity position of the loaded sample is established based on the center of gravity position of the loaded sample. Right click "external load", select "remote load/mass" command, from dialog, type column, select "load (direct transfer)"; referring to the coordinate system column, selecting 'user definition' and selecting the established coordinate system 1 in the digital analogy; filling the gravity center distance value into a Y value according to the gravity center parameter and the position column item of the load sample piece: 1500, force column item, Y direction input 59000, confirm the direction of the good force;
as shown in fig. 12, right clicking "grid", selecting "generate grid" command, from the dialog box, grid density column item, moving arrow to the right-most "good" end with mouse, clicking "check mark" in the upper left corner, and completing the item; the generated grid is shown in FIG. 13;
as shown in FIGS. 14-15, clicking the upper toolbar "run this example", looking up the displacement 1 in "result", and clicking the "detect" command in the "graphic tools" pull-down menu can measure that the deformation value of the deep red region is Δ1=0.29mm。
Based on the bracket, the actual deformation is delta through field physical verification and measurement by a dial indicator2=1.94mm。
As shown in fig. 16 to 18, the periphery and the inside of the H-shaped structure of the bracket are reinforced and improved respectively, and the theoretically calculated deformation value Δ can be obtained sequentially according to the above process and the same principle1' -0.15 mm; actual amount of deformation is Δ2’=1.0mm。
Further, based on the actual measured deformation amount Δ2Theoretically calculated deformation quantity delta of structural member1And calculating the ratio I of the deformation1=Δ21The ratio of the two deformation amounts is I1=Δ21=1.94/0.29=6.68;Ι2=Δ2’/Δ1' -1.0/0.15-6.66; get I1、Ι2Is determined by the average value of (a) of (b),
Figure BDA0002273704250000051
let I be 6.7.
Through repeated practical application case verification, the structural part deformation delta measured and calculated through experiments2From the theoretically calculated deformation Δ of the structural part1Finally, the ratio I ═ Delta of the deformation amount is obtained216.7, i.e. 6.7 Δ is required1The deformation delta not greater than the design requirement can meet the design requirement.

Claims (4)

1. The method for confirming the ratio of the deformation of the structural part calculated based on software to the actual deformation is characterized in that: the method comprises the following steps:
s1, theoretically calculating the deformation amount delta1The value: modeling a structural member bracket through solidworks software, opening a simulation plug-in command, respectively setting various parameters for the bracket according to actual load conditions, and operating the command of the example through gridding to obtain the theoretical deformation delta of the bracket1
S2, processing the bracket into a real object according to the digital model of the bracket;
s3, preparing a load sample, a bracket, a support frame and a dial indicator;
s4, sequentially placing the bracket on the support frame, placing the load sample on the bracket, and respectively measuring the difference value of the data read by the dial indicator as the maximum actual deformation P of the bracket when the load sample is hoisted and placed in front of and behind the bracket by the dial indicatorΔ2The deformation of the carriage is elastic deformation, the deformation of the carriage is measured three times, and the value is read three timesMean value of
Figure FDA0002273704240000011
Order to
Figure FDA0002273704240000012
Figure FDA0002273704240000013
S5: according to the actual measured deformation quantity delta2Theoretically calculated deformation quantity delta of structural member1And calculating the ratio I of the deformation1=Δ21
S6: the bracket is once modified, and the ratio I is calculated according to the steps from S1 to S52Taking the average of the two ratios
Figure FDA0002273704240000014
Order to
Figure FDA0002273704240000015
Therefore, the ratio I of the deformation of the structural part to the actual deformation based on software calculation is obtained.
2. The method for confirming a ratio of a deformation of a structure to an actual deformation based on software calculation according to claim 1, wherein: the modification may include adjusting the bracket configuration, dimensions, material parameters or load parameters.
3. The method for confirming a ratio of a deformation of a structure to an actual deformation based on software calculation according to claim 1, wherein: the solidworks software is solidworks2014 software.
4. A method for validating a software-based calculation of a ratio of a deformation to an actual deformation of a structural member as claimed in claim 3, wherein: the step S1 includes the following operations:
modeling the structure carrier through solidworks2014, opening the simulation plug-in command in solidworks2014 version, clicking "examples advisor", selecting "new examples" in the drop-down menu, selecting "static stress analysis" in the type, naming "static stress analysis 1";
right clicking the 'part', selecting an 'application material to all' commands, and selecting a 'common carbon steel' material in 'solid works materials';
right-clicking 'link', selecting 'part touch' command, touching type column, selecting 'joint' from dialog box; a parts column, to select "global touch"; the option column selects the 'compatible grid', and finally clicks the 'V' at the upper left corner to finish the item;
right-clicking the 'clamp', selecting a 'fixed geometry' command, selecting 'fixed geometry' from a dialog box, and selecting a contact surface of the fixed geometry in a digital model;
right-clicking the 'external load', selecting a 'gravitation' command, selecting a reference plane in a digital mode from a dialog box, and confirming the direction of the gravitation in the dialog box;
establishing a coordinate system 1 coincident with the gravity center position of the load sample piece according to the gravity center position of the load sample piece; right click "external load", select "remote load/mass" command, from dialog, type column, select "load (direct transfer)"; referring to the coordinate system column, selecting 'user definition' and selecting the established coordinate system 1 in the digital analogy; filling the gravity center distance value into a Y value according to the gravity center parameter and the position column item of the load sample piece: 1500, force column item, Y direction input 59000, confirm the direction of the good force;
right clicking 'grid', selecting 'generating grid' command, moving an arrow to the rightmost 'good' end by a mouse from a grid density column item in a dialog box, and clicking 'check square' at the upper left corner to finish the item; the generated grid;
clicking the upper toolbar to run the example, checking the displacement 1 in the result, and clicking the detection command in the pull-down menu of the graphic tool to measure the deformation value delta of the dark red area1
CN201911114531.2A 2019-11-14 2019-11-14 Method for confirming ratio of structural part deformation and actual deformation calculated based on software Active CN110806295B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201911114531.2A CN110806295B (en) 2019-11-14 2019-11-14 Method for confirming ratio of structural part deformation and actual deformation calculated based on software

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201911114531.2A CN110806295B (en) 2019-11-14 2019-11-14 Method for confirming ratio of structural part deformation and actual deformation calculated based on software

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN110806295A true CN110806295A (en) 2020-02-18
CN110806295B CN110806295B (en) 2021-08-24

Family

ID=69502764

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201911114531.2A Active CN110806295B (en) 2019-11-14 2019-11-14 Method for confirming ratio of structural part deformation and actual deformation calculated based on software

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN110806295B (en)

Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0438347A1 (en) * 1990-01-17 1991-07-24 Etat Francais - Laboratoire Central Des Ponts Et Chaussees Method and apparatus for controlling the bedding of a post
CN102024081A (en) * 2010-12-13 2011-04-20 四川省宜宾普什模具有限公司 Automobile panel die design method
CN104424380A (en) * 2013-09-06 2015-03-18 空中客车运营简化股份公司 Mechanical strain gauge simulation
CN205280393U (en) * 2016-01-11 2016-06-01 四川农业大学 Bridge structures model loading experiment device
CN105956342A (en) * 2016-06-23 2016-09-21 北京航空航天大学 Self-locking composite pre-deformation cabin door structure optimization design method
CN106500651A (en) * 2016-11-16 2017-03-15 上海建工集团股份有限公司 A kind of method for safety monitoring of construction geometry deformation
CN206095634U (en) * 2016-08-23 2017-04-12 中航工业哈尔滨轴承有限公司 Thin wall cylindrical roller bearing flange deformation experiment frock
CN107271271A (en) * 2017-06-30 2017-10-20 东南大学 A kind of ancillary test device for being exclusively used in the research of small rod flexural property

Patent Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0438347A1 (en) * 1990-01-17 1991-07-24 Etat Francais - Laboratoire Central Des Ponts Et Chaussees Method and apparatus for controlling the bedding of a post
CN102024081A (en) * 2010-12-13 2011-04-20 四川省宜宾普什模具有限公司 Automobile panel die design method
CN104424380A (en) * 2013-09-06 2015-03-18 空中客车运营简化股份公司 Mechanical strain gauge simulation
CN205280393U (en) * 2016-01-11 2016-06-01 四川农业大学 Bridge structures model loading experiment device
CN105956342A (en) * 2016-06-23 2016-09-21 北京航空航天大学 Self-locking composite pre-deformation cabin door structure optimization design method
CN206095634U (en) * 2016-08-23 2017-04-12 中航工业哈尔滨轴承有限公司 Thin wall cylindrical roller bearing flange deformation experiment frock
CN106500651A (en) * 2016-11-16 2017-03-15 上海建工集团股份有限公司 A kind of method for safety monitoring of construction geometry deformation
CN107271271A (en) * 2017-06-30 2017-10-20 东南大学 A kind of ancillary test device for being exclusively used in the research of small rod flexural property

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
张文信: "《工程图学和机械设计的理论研究与实践探索》", 30 September 2007, 兵器工业出版社 *
张森: "基于灵敏度和有限元分析的龙门加工中心横梁结构轻量化设计", 《中国优秀硕士学位论文全文数据库 工程科技I辑》 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN110806295B (en) 2021-08-24

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN103267507B (en) The method of the flatness error of mechanical structural plan is extracted based on finite element analysis
CN104915483B (en) Building stability of foundation Method for Checking under a kind of geological process
CN102944417A (en) Platform and method for testing static rigidity of machine tool spindle
CN101907439A (en) Stimulated measurement and detection method in architectural steel structure fabrication
CN101825522A (en) Self-diagnosis system for wind-induced cumulative fatigue damage of pull lug node substructure of mast structure
CN107063060A (en) A kind of method and device for determining surface planarity
CN102567578B (en) Spacecraft vibration test fixture evaluation system
CN114722686B (en) Method for designing and optimizing lifting lug of large equipment based on finite element analysis
IL273294B1 (en) Metrology method and system
CN103964311A (en) Engineering equipment as well as overall stability detection method and device thereof
CN106525294A (en) Three-directional force calibration device and method for TBM (Tunnel Boring Machine) hob
CN102279126B (en) Method for determining material performance parameter by combination of testing and CAE simulation
CN105526900B (en) The method for measuring wheel hub beveled walls thickness size
CN102831281B (en) The aided modeling method in two-dimensional working face is set up in GOCAD software
CN110806295B (en) Method for confirming ratio of structural part deformation and actual deformation calculated based on software
CN105628280B (en) Armored vehicle comprehensive actuator foil gauge force measuring support seat
CN109341838B (en) Double-robot cooperation system and method for weighing apparatus verification
CN115880274A (en) Prefabricated part quality detection method and system based on three-dimensional computer vision
CN102269581B (en) Machining precision evaluation method of architectural component
CN104359435A (en) Constraint measuring tool and using method thereof
CN117786882A (en) A test frame reduction analysis method and related devices based on similarity theory
Matta et al. 3D Design support and software compensation for rapid virtual prototyping of tractor rockshaft arm
JP4874200B2 (en) Detection method of crack occurrence position during press forming
CN105606354B (en) Armored vehicle comprehensive actuator support base vertical direction stress Calibrating experimental bench
CN202452932U (en) Shield cover inspection tool

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant
CP03 Change of name, title or address
CP03 Change of name, title or address

Address after: 264006 No. 3, No. 49, Tianshan Road, development zone, Yantai City, Shandong Province

Patentee after: Shandong Ruisiman Intelligent Technology Co.,Ltd.

Country or region after: China

Address before: 264006 No. 3, No. 49, Tianshan Road, development zone, Yantai City, Shandong Province

Patentee before: SHANDONG VALUE INTELLIGENT TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD.

Country or region before: China

TR01 Transfer of patent right
TR01 Transfer of patent right

Effective date of registration: 20240829

Address after: Room 19, 1st floor, building 27, 487 Tianlin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai 200030

Patentee after: SHANGHAI VALUE AUTOMATION TECHNOLOGY Co.,Ltd.

Country or region after: China

Address before: 264006 No. 3, No. 49, Tianshan Road, development zone, Yantai City, Shandong Province

Patentee before: Shandong Ruisiman Intelligent Technology Co.,Ltd.

Country or region before: China