CN107575219A - A kind of shale gas reservoir formation fracture pressure gradient computational methods - Google Patents
A kind of shale gas reservoir formation fracture pressure gradient computational methods Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN107575219A CN107575219A CN201710840885.XA CN201710840885A CN107575219A CN 107575219 A CN107575219 A CN 107575219A CN 201710840885 A CN201710840885 A CN 201710840885A CN 107575219 A CN107575219 A CN 107575219A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- fracture pressure
- formation
- density
- shale gas
- pressure gradient
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Landscapes
- Geophysics And Detection Of Objects (AREA)
- Investigation Of Foundation Soil And Reinforcement Of Foundation Soil By Compacting Or Drainage (AREA)
Abstract
本发明涉及页岩气储层地层破裂压力梯度计算方法,收集全井段的常规测井曲线数据,计算岩石骨架密度ρma,确定地层平均孔隙度Φ和流体密度ρw;收集页岩气井储层段深度、垂深、声波AC、密度DEN、中子CNL测井曲线数据;通过ρ=(1‑Φ)*ρma+Φ*ρw计算地层平均密度;通过拟合回归的方法确定破裂压力系数K:K=P0+P1*AC+P2*DEN+P3*CNL,根据公式FRAC=K*ρ计算页岩储层地层破裂压力梯度,再用公式:FP=FRAC*H计算破裂压力,最后输出结果。本发明已在涪陵页岩气田应用页岩气井200多口井,计算的地层破裂压力梯度与实际施工获得的地层破裂压力梯度较接近,误差小于15%。
The invention relates to a method for calculating the fracture pressure gradient of a shale gas reservoir formation, which collects conventional logging curve data of the entire well section, calculates the rock skeleton density ρma, and determines the average porosity Φ and fluid density ρw of the formation; collects the shale gas well reservoir section Depth, vertical depth, acoustic AC, density DEN, neutron CNL log data; calculate the average formation density by ρ=(1‑Φ)*ρma+Φ*ρw; determine the fracture pressure coefficient K by fitting regression method: K=P0+P1*AC+P2*DEN+P3*CNL, calculate the fracture pressure gradient of the shale reservoir formation according to the formula FRAC=K*ρ, then use the formula: FP=FRAC*H to calculate the fracture pressure, and finally output the result. The present invention has been applied to more than 200 shale gas wells in the Fuling shale gas field, and the calculated stratum fracture pressure gradient is closer to the stratum fracture pressure gradient obtained by actual construction, with an error of less than 15%.
Description
技术领域technical field
本发明涉及一种利用常规测井资料计算与确定页岩储层地层破裂压力的方法,具体涉及一种页岩气储层地层破裂压力梯度计算方法。The invention relates to a method for calculating and determining the fracture pressure of a shale reservoir formation by using conventional logging data, in particular to a method for calculating the fracture pressure gradient of a shale gas reservoir formation.
背景技术Background technique
页岩气是一种新型清洁能源,而且是一种重要的非常规天然气资源。页岩气开发需要以“井工厂”模式钻探水平井,对水平井水平段页岩气储层需要进行多段大规模压裂改造,成本高,风险大。页岩气储层地层破裂梯度和地层破裂压力参数计算或预测的精度十分重要,直接影响储层改造效果。Shale gas is a new type of clean energy and an important unconventional natural gas resource. The development of shale gas requires the drilling of horizontal wells in the "well factory" mode, and the shale gas reservoirs in the horizontal section of horizontal wells need to undergo multi-stage large-scale fracturing, which is costly and risky. The accuracy of calculation or prediction of formation fracture gradient and formation fracture pressure parameters in shale gas reservoirs is very important, which directly affects the effect of reservoir stimulation.
传统的地层破裂压力梯度计算方法主要有伊顿法、马修斯与凯利法、克里斯特曼法。这些方法主要是在上世纪六十年代至七十年代期间形成,解决的是砂岩、碳酸盐岩等常规储层地层破裂梯度和地层破裂压力参数计算或预测问题。The traditional calculation methods of formation fracture pressure gradient mainly include Eaton method, Matthews and Kelly method, and Christman method. These methods were mainly formed during the 1960s and 1970s to solve the problem of calculating or predicting the formation fracture gradient and formation fracture pressure parameters of conventional reservoirs such as sandstone and carbonate rock.
随着国内页岩气田的发现和页岩气勘探开发试验规模的扩大,页岩气水平井多段压裂成本高、风险大,对页岩气储层的地层破裂压力梯度、地层破裂压力计算精度要求越来越高,传统的地层破裂压力梯度计算方法难以适应生产需求,计算误差大的问题越来越突出。With the discovery of domestic shale gas fields and the expansion of shale gas exploration and development test scale, the cost and risk of multi-stage fracturing of shale gas horizontal wells are high, and the calculation accuracy of formation fracture pressure gradient and formation fracture pressure of shale gas reservoirs As the requirements are getting higher and higher, the traditional calculation method of formation fracture pressure gradient is difficult to meet the production needs, and the problem of large calculation errors is becoming more and more prominent.
发明内容Contents of the invention
本发明的目的是针对上述技术现状,旨在提供一种能够利用常规测井曲线资料计算可靠的页岩气储层地层破裂压力的方法。The purpose of the present invention is to aim at the present technical situation mentioned above, aiming to provide a kind of method that can calculate reliable fracture pressure of shale gas reservoir stratum by using conventional logging curve data.
本发明目的的实现方式为,页岩气储层地层破裂压力梯度计算方法,具体步骤为:The method for realizing the object of the present invention is a method for calculating the fracture pressure gradient of a shale gas reservoir formation, and the specific steps are:
1)收集全井段的常规测井曲线数据,常规测井曲线资料包括自然伽马、中子、密度、声波、电阻率测井曲线;采用加权平均法使用常规测井曲线数据计算岩石骨架密度ρma,利用全井段常规测井曲线数据和区域探井取心井的岩心孔隙度分析资料,确定地层平均孔隙度Φ和流体密度ρw;1) Collect the conventional well logging curve data of the whole well section. The conventional well logging curve data include natural gamma ray, neutron, density, acoustic wave and resistivity logging curves; the weighted average method is used to calculate the rock skeleton density using the conventional well logging curve data ρma, using the conventional logging curve data of the whole well section and the core porosity analysis data of core wells taken from regional exploratory wells, determine the average porosity Φ and fluid density ρw of the formation;
岩石骨架密度ρma量纲为g/cm3,The dimension of rock skeleton density ρma is g/cm 3 ,
地层平均孔隙度Φ量纲为百分比,The dimension of formation average porosity Φ is percentage,
流体密度ρw量纲为g/cm3;The dimension of fluid density ρw is g/cm 3 ;
2)收集页岩气井储层段深度、垂深、声波AC、密度DEN、中子CNL测井曲线数据;2) Collect shale gas well reservoir depth, vertical depth, acoustic AC, density DEN, neutron CNL logging curve data;
密度DEN量纲为g/cm3,The dimension of density DEN is g/cm 3 ,
声波AC量纲为μs/m,The AC dimension of sound wave is μs/m,
中子CNL量纲为百分比,The dimension of neutron CNL is percentage,
3)由步骤1)所得地层岩石骨架密度ρma、孔隙度Φ及流体密度ρw计算地层平均密度ρ:3) Calculate the formation average density ρ from the formation rock skeleton density ρma, porosity Φ and fluid density ρw obtained in step 1):
ρ=(1-Φ)*ρma+Φ*ρw;ρ=(1-Φ)*ρma+Φ*ρw;
地层平均密度ρ量纲为g/cm3,The dimension of formation average density ρ is g/cm 3 ,
4)由步骤2)所收集得页岩储层段声波、密度DEN、中子测井曲线数据结合地区已压裂井破裂压力,通过拟合回归的方法确定破裂压力系数K:K=P0+P1*AC+P2*DEN+P3*CNL,4) Combine the acoustic wave, density DEN, and neutron logging curve data of the shale reservoir section collected in step 2) with the fracture pressure of the fractured wells in the area, and determine the fracture pressure coefficient K by fitting regression method: K=P0+ P1*AC+P2*DEN+P3*CNL,
式中P0至P3为地区经验系数,与压裂段地层岩性有关,地层岩性与测井曲线有关;In the formula, P0 to P3 are regional empirical coefficients, which are related to the formation lithology of the fracturing section, and the formation lithology is related to the logging curve;
5)通过公式:FRAC=K*ρ计算页岩气储层段地层破裂压力梯度FRAC;5) Calculate the formation fracture pressure gradient FRAC of the shale gas reservoir section by the formula: FRAC=K*ρ;
式中页岩储层地层破裂压力梯度FPAC量纲为MPa/100m,In the formula, the fracture pressure gradient FPAC dimension of the shale reservoir is MPa/100m,
地层平均密度ρ量纲为g/cm3,The dimension of formation average density ρ is g/cm 3 ,
6)输出计算结果。6) Output calculation results.
本发明已在涪陵页岩气田应用页岩气井200多口井,计算的地层破裂压力梯度与实际施工获得的地层破裂压力梯度较接近,误差小于15%。The present invention has been applied to more than 200 shale gas wells in the Fuling shale gas field, and the calculated stratum fracture pressure gradient is closer to the stratum fracture pressure gradient obtained by actual construction, with an error of less than 15%.
附图说明Description of drawings
图1为本发明工作流程框图。Fig. 1 is a block diagram of the workflow of the present invention.
具体实施方式detailed description
参照图1,本发明的具体步骤为:With reference to Fig. 1, concrete steps of the present invention are:
1)收集全井段的常规测井曲线数据,常规测井曲线资料包括自然伽马、中子、密度、声波、电阻率等测井曲线;采用加权平均法使用密度测井曲线数据计算岩石骨架密度ρma,利用全井段常规测井曲线数据和区域探井取心井的岩心孔隙度分析资料确定地层平均孔隙度Φ和流体密度ρw;1) Collect the conventional logging curve data of the whole well section. The conventional logging curve data include natural gamma ray, neutron, density, acoustic wave, resistivity and other logging curves; use the weighted average method to calculate the rock skeleton using the density logging curve data Density ρma, the average porosity Φ and fluid density ρw of the formation are determined by using the conventional logging curve data of the whole well section and the core porosity analysis data of the core well of the regional exploration well;
岩石骨架密度ρma量纲为g/cm3,The dimension of rock skeleton density ρma is g/cm 3 ,
地层平均孔隙度Φ量纲为百分比,The dimension of formation average porosity Φ is percentage,
流体密度ρw量纲为g/cm3。The dimension of fluid density ρw is g/cm 3 .
其中常规测井曲线资料为排除坏井眼和不可靠数据资料。流体密度ρw一般取1.1±0.1g/cm3。Among them, the conventional logging curve data are used to exclude bad boreholes and unreliable data. Fluid density ρw is generally taken as 1.1±0.1g/cm 3 .
2)收集页岩气井储层段深度、垂深、声波AC、密度DEN、中子CNL测井曲线数据;2) Collect shale gas well reservoir depth, vertical depth, acoustic AC, density DEN, neutron CNL logging curve data;
密度DEN量纲为g/cm3,The dimension of density DEN is g/cm 3 ,
声波AC量纲为μs/m,The AC dimension of sound wave is μs/m,
中子CNL量纲为百分比。The dimension of neutron CNL is percentage.
3)由步骤1)所得地层岩石骨架密度ρma、孔隙度Φ及流体密度ρw计算地层平均密度ρ:3) Calculate the formation average density ρ from the formation rock skeleton density ρma, porosity Φ and fluid density ρw obtained in step 1):
ρ=(1-Φ)*ρma+Φ*ρw;ρ=(1-Φ)*ρma+Φ*ρw;
地层平均密度ρ量纲为g/cm3,The dimension of formation average density ρ is g/cm 3 ,
4)由步骤2)所收集得页岩储层段声波、密度DEN、中子测井曲线数据结合地区已压裂井破裂压力,通过拟合回归的方法确定破裂压力系数K:K=P0+P1*AC+P2*DEN+P3*CNL,4) Combine the acoustic wave, density DEN, and neutron logging curve data of the shale reservoir section collected in step 2) with the fracture pressure of the fractured wells in the area, and determine the fracture pressure coefficient K by fitting regression method: K=P0+ P1*AC+P2*DEN+P3*CNL,
破裂压力系数与压裂段地层岩性有关,地层岩性与测井曲线有关,通过以压裂井的资料结合数据拟合方法可以确定地区经验系数P0-P3,从而计算地层破裂压力系数。The fracture pressure coefficient is related to the formation lithology of the fracturing section, and the formation lithology is related to the logging curve. The regional experience coefficient P0-P3 can be determined by combining the data of the fracturing well with the data fitting method, so as to calculate the formation fracture pressure coefficient.
5)通过公式:FRAC=K*ρ计算页岩气储层段地层破裂压力梯度FRAC;5) Calculate the formation fracture pressure gradient FRAC of the shale gas reservoir section by the formula: FRAC=K*ρ;
式中页岩储层地层破裂压力梯度FPAC量纲为MPa/100m,In the formula, the fracture pressure gradient FPAC dimension of the shale reservoir is MPa/100m,
地层平均密度ρ量纲为g/cm3,The dimension of formation average density ρ is g/cm 3 ,
6)输出计算结果。6) Output calculation results.
下面用具体实施例详述本发明。(实施例最好按前面的步骤写)The present invention is described in detail below with specific examples. (The embodiment is preferably written according to the previous steps)
实例一:某气田JY2-3井Example 1: Well JY2-3 in a certain gas field
1)收集该井全井段常规测井曲线数据(包括声波、密度、中子曲线),采用加权平均法使用密度测井曲线数据计算岩石平均骨架密度ρma为2.67g/cm3,利用全井段常规测井曲线数据和区域探井取心井的岩心孔隙度分析资料确定地层平均孔隙度Φ为0.05,流体密度ρw为1.05g/cm3;1) Collect the conventional logging curve data (including acoustic wave, density, and neutron curve) of the whole well section of the well, and use the weighted average method to calculate the average skeleton density ρma of the rock as 2.67g/cm 3 using the density logging curve data. The average porosity Φ of the formation is determined to be 0.05, and the fluid density ρw is 1.05g/cm 3 according to the conventional logging curve data of the section and the core porosity analysis data of the core well of the regional exploration well;
2)确定页岩气储层井段为2980.0-4490.0m垂深为2448.0-2521.0m,并且收集页岩储层段声波、密度、中子测井曲线数据;2) Determine the well section of the shale gas reservoir to be 2980.0-4490.0m and the vertical depth to be 2448.0-2521.0m, and collect the data of acoustic wave, density and neutron logging curves of the shale reservoir section;
3)通过ρ=(1-Φ)*ρma+Φ*ρw;计算地层平均密度ρ为2.589g/cm3;3) By ρ=(1-Φ)*ρma+Φ*ρw; calculate the average formation density ρ to be 2.589g/cm 3 ;
4)通过压裂段声波、密度、中子测井曲线数据确定破裂压力系数k(与区域地层有关的地区经验系数),破裂压力系数计算公式(AC为声波,DEN为密度,CNL为中子,P0-P3为常数):K=P0+P1*AC+P2*DEN+P3*CNL。通过对涪陵地区260多口井4000余段压裂数据进行拟合分析,采用拟合回归方法得出p1=-0.004274867,p2=-0.046441009,p3=0.004972802,p0=2.019452937。计算得到该压裂段平均K值为0.977。4) Determine the fracture pressure coefficient k (area empirical coefficient related to regional strata) through the data of acoustic wave, density, and neutron logging curves in the fracturing section, and the formula for calculating the fracture pressure coefficient (AC is acoustic wave, DEN is density, CNL is neutron , P0-P3 are constants): K=P0+P1*AC+P2*DEN+P3*CNL. Through the fitting analysis of more than 4,000 fracturing data of more than 260 wells in the Fuling area, the fitting regression method was used to obtain p1=-0.004274867, p2=-0.046441009, p3=0.004972802, p0=2.019452937. The average K value of this fracturing section is calculated to be 0.977.
5)通过公式:FRAC=K*ρ计算压裂段地层破裂压力梯度为2.537,平均破裂压力63.06MPa;5) By the formula: FRAC=K*ρ, the formation fracture pressure gradient in the fracturing section is calculated to be 2.537, and the average fracture pressure is 63.06MPa;
6)根据用户需求输出破裂压力梯度和破裂压力计算结果。6) Output the fracture pressure gradient and fracture pressure calculation results according to user requirements.
利用本发明计算JY2-3井2980.0-4490.0m井段页岩气层地层破裂压力为63.06MPa。完井压裂施工,实测该井20段平均地层破裂压力为63.48MPa,误差小于10%,两者计算结果非常接近,初期无阻流量日产天然气约116.39×104m3,压裂改造效果显著。The fracturing pressure of the shale gas layer in the 2980.0-4490.0m well section of the JY2-3 well section calculated by the present invention is 63.06MPa. The average formation fracture pressure of the 20 sections of the well was measured to be 63.48MPa, with an error of less than 10%. The calculated results are very close. The initial unobstructed flow rate of natural gas production is about 116.39×10 4 m 3 , and the fracturing effect is remarkable.
由实例1可见,本发明计算的地层破裂压力梯度、地层破裂压力与实测结果接近,误差小于10%,符合现场施工需要,具有较强的应用价值。It can be seen from Example 1 that the formation fracture pressure gradient and formation fracture pressure calculated by the present invention are close to the actual measurement results, and the error is less than 10%, which meets the needs of on-site construction and has strong application value.
实例二:某页岩气田JY13-2井Example 2: Well JY13-2 in a shale gas field
JY13-2井是一口长水平段水平井,气藏水平段为2630-4078m,气藏垂深为2330.0-2412.0m,水平段在气藏中穿越。Well JY13-2 is a horizontal well with a long horizontal section, the horizontal section of the gas reservoir is 2630-4078m, the vertical depth of the gas reservoir is 2330.0-2412.0m, and the horizontal section passes through the gas reservoir.
1)收集该井全井段常规测井曲线数据(包括声波、密度、中子曲线),采用加权平均法使用密度测井曲线数据计算岩石平均骨架密度ρma为2.67g/cm3,利用全井段常规测井曲线数据和区域探井取心井的岩心孔隙度分析资料确定地层平均孔隙度Φ为0.05,流体密度ρw为1.05g/cm3;1) Collect the conventional logging curve data (including acoustic wave, density, and neutron curve) of the whole well section of the well, and use the weighted average method to calculate the average skeleton density ρma of the rock as 2.67g/cm 3 using the density logging curve data. The average porosity Φ of the formation is determined to be 0.05, and the fluid density ρw is 1.05g/cm 3 according to the conventional logging curve data of the section and the core porosity analysis data of the core well of the regional exploration well;
2)确定页岩气储层井段为2630-4078m,垂深为2332.0-2412.0m,并且收集页岩储层段声波、密度、中子测井曲线数据;2) Determine the well section of the shale gas reservoir to be 2630-4078m, and the vertical depth to be 2332.0-2412.0m, and collect the acoustic wave, density and neutron logging curve data of the shale reservoir section;
3)通过ρ=(1-Φ)*ρma+Φ*ρw;计算地层平均密度ρ为2.589g/cm3;3) By ρ=(1-Φ)*ρma+Φ*ρw; calculate the average formation density ρ to be 2.589g/cm 3 ;
4)通过压裂段声波、密度、中子测井曲线数据确定破裂压力系数k(与区域地层有关的地区经验系数),破裂压力系数计算公式(AC为声波,DEN为密度,CNL为中子,P0-P3为常数):K=P0+P1*AC+P2*DEN+P3*CNL,通过对涪陵地区260多口井4000余段压裂数据进行拟合分析,采用拟合回归方法得出p1=-0.004274867,p2=-0.046441009,p3=0.004972802,p0=2.019452937,计算得到该压裂段平均K值为1.036;4) Determine the fracture pressure coefficient k (area empirical coefficient related to regional strata) through the data of acoustic wave, density, and neutron logging curves in the fracturing section, and the formula for calculating the fracture pressure coefficient (AC is acoustic wave, DEN is density, CNL is neutron , P0-P3 is a constant): K=P0+P1*AC+P2*DEN+P3*CNL, through the fitting analysis of more than 4,000 fracturing data of more than 260 wells in Fuling area, using the fitting regression method to obtain p1=-0.004274867, p2=-0.046441009, p3=0.004972802, p0=2.019452937, the calculated average K value of this fracturing section is 1.036;
5)通过公式:FRAC=K*ρ计算压裂段地层破裂压力梯度为2.137,平均破裂压力64.2MPa;5) By the formula: FRAC=K*ρ, the formation fracture pressure gradient in the fracturing section is calculated as 2.137, and the average fracture pressure is 64.2MPa;
6)根据用户需求输出破裂压力梯度和破裂压力计算结果。6) Output the fracture pressure gradient and fracture pressure calculation results according to user requirements.
利用本发明计算的JY13-2井2630-4078m水平段页岩气层地层平均破裂压力为64.2MPa。完井压裂作业,分18段施工,施工实测地层平均破裂压力为60.0MPa,初期无阻流量日产天然气约111.02×104m3,压裂改造效果明显。The average fracture pressure of the shale gas formation in the 2630-4078m horizontal section of the JY13-2 well calculated by the present invention is 64.2MPa. The completion fracturing operation was carried out in 18 stages. The average fracture pressure of the formation measured during the construction was 60.0MPa, and the initial unobstructed flow rate of natural gas production was about 111.02×10 4 m 3 per day. The fracturing effect was obvious.
由实例1可见,本发明计算的地层破裂压力梯度、地层破裂压力与实测结果接近,误差小于10%,指导压裂施工效果良好。It can be seen from Example 1 that the formation fracture pressure gradient and formation fracture pressure calculated by the present invention are close to the actual measurement results, with an error of less than 10%, and the effect of guiding fracturing operation is good.
Claims (3)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201710840885.XA CN107575219B (en) | 2017-09-15 | 2017-09-15 | Shale gas reservoir stratum fracture pressure gradient calculation method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201710840885.XA CN107575219B (en) | 2017-09-15 | 2017-09-15 | Shale gas reservoir stratum fracture pressure gradient calculation method |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN107575219A true CN107575219A (en) | 2018-01-12 |
CN107575219B CN107575219B (en) | 2020-08-07 |
Family
ID=61036319
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201710840885.XA Active CN107575219B (en) | 2017-09-15 | 2017-09-15 | Shale gas reservoir stratum fracture pressure gradient calculation method |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN107575219B (en) |
Cited By (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN108708715A (en) * | 2018-05-02 | 2018-10-26 | 中石化石油工程技术服务有限公司 | The survey logging method of fast prediction shale gas-bearing formation formation fracture pressure gradient |
CN108801538A (en) * | 2018-06-15 | 2018-11-13 | 中国石油大学(华东) | A method of calculating decline of pressure gradient |
CN110410069A (en) * | 2019-08-15 | 2019-11-05 | 中石化石油工程技术服务有限公司 | Logging prediction method of formation fracture pressure gradient in shale gas horizontal wells |
CN110469321A (en) * | 2019-08-05 | 2019-11-19 | 中石化江汉石油工程有限公司 | A kind of logging method of determining stratum fracture pressure gradient |
CN113550740A (en) * | 2020-04-24 | 2021-10-26 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Method for realizing continuous calculation of longitudinal pressure gradient of single well |
CN115773106A (en) * | 2021-09-08 | 2023-03-10 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Method for identifying evolution process of overpressure sealing box by using paleo-pressure attenuation gradient |
Citations (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5282384A (en) * | 1992-10-05 | 1994-02-01 | Baroid Technology, Inc. | Method for calculating sedimentary rock pore pressure |
CN1588128A (en) * | 2004-10-22 | 2005-03-02 | 石油大学(北京) | Method for predicting collapse pressure and bursting pressure for borehole to be drilled section using earthquake record |
CN101025084A (en) * | 2006-02-20 | 2007-08-29 | 中国石油大学(北京) | Method for predetecting formation pore pressure under drill-bit while drilling |
CN102733789A (en) * | 2012-07-06 | 2012-10-17 | 崔彦立 | Staged fracturing construction yield increment method for waterpower in deep thickened oil deposit thick-bedded sandstone storage layer |
CN104573344A (en) * | 2014-12-25 | 2015-04-29 | 中国海洋石油总公司 | Method for acquiring gas content of shale reservoir through well logging data |
US20150176387A1 (en) * | 2013-12-20 | 2015-06-25 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Perforation strategy |
CN105257252A (en) * | 2015-06-08 | 2016-01-20 | 中国石油集团川庆钻探工程有限公司 | Method for optimizing shale gas horizontal well clustering perforation well section by using logging information |
CN106285646A (en) * | 2016-09-09 | 2017-01-04 | 中国石油大学(华东) | Drilling well loss horizon recognition methods based on Multi-information acquisition |
-
2017
- 2017-09-15 CN CN201710840885.XA patent/CN107575219B/en active Active
Patent Citations (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5282384A (en) * | 1992-10-05 | 1994-02-01 | Baroid Technology, Inc. | Method for calculating sedimentary rock pore pressure |
CN1588128A (en) * | 2004-10-22 | 2005-03-02 | 石油大学(北京) | Method for predicting collapse pressure and bursting pressure for borehole to be drilled section using earthquake record |
CN101025084A (en) * | 2006-02-20 | 2007-08-29 | 中国石油大学(北京) | Method for predetecting formation pore pressure under drill-bit while drilling |
CN102733789A (en) * | 2012-07-06 | 2012-10-17 | 崔彦立 | Staged fracturing construction yield increment method for waterpower in deep thickened oil deposit thick-bedded sandstone storage layer |
US20150176387A1 (en) * | 2013-12-20 | 2015-06-25 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Perforation strategy |
CN104573344A (en) * | 2014-12-25 | 2015-04-29 | 中国海洋石油总公司 | Method for acquiring gas content of shale reservoir through well logging data |
CN105257252A (en) * | 2015-06-08 | 2016-01-20 | 中国石油集团川庆钻探工程有限公司 | Method for optimizing shale gas horizontal well clustering perforation well section by using logging information |
CN106285646A (en) * | 2016-09-09 | 2017-01-04 | 中国石油大学(华东) | Drilling well loss horizon recognition methods based on Multi-information acquisition |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
华北石油管理局干部处: "《华北油田保护油气层技术》", 31 August 1996 * |
Cited By (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN108708715A (en) * | 2018-05-02 | 2018-10-26 | 中石化石油工程技术服务有限公司 | The survey logging method of fast prediction shale gas-bearing formation formation fracture pressure gradient |
CN108801538A (en) * | 2018-06-15 | 2018-11-13 | 中国石油大学(华东) | A method of calculating decline of pressure gradient |
CN108801538B (en) * | 2018-06-15 | 2020-10-30 | 中国石油大学(华东) | A method for calculating the pressure decay gradient |
CN110469321A (en) * | 2019-08-05 | 2019-11-19 | 中石化江汉石油工程有限公司 | A kind of logging method of determining stratum fracture pressure gradient |
CN110410069A (en) * | 2019-08-15 | 2019-11-05 | 中石化石油工程技术服务有限公司 | Logging prediction method of formation fracture pressure gradient in shale gas horizontal wells |
CN110410069B (en) * | 2019-08-15 | 2022-08-19 | 中石化石油工程技术服务有限公司 | Shale gas horizontal well stratum fracture pressure gradient logging prediction method |
CN113550740A (en) * | 2020-04-24 | 2021-10-26 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Method for realizing continuous calculation of longitudinal pressure gradient of single well |
CN115773106A (en) * | 2021-09-08 | 2023-03-10 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Method for identifying evolution process of overpressure sealing box by using paleo-pressure attenuation gradient |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN107575219B (en) | 2020-08-07 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN107575219A (en) | A kind of shale gas reservoir formation fracture pressure gradient computational methods | |
US10767448B2 (en) | Multistage oilfield design optimization under uncertainty | |
US9715026B2 (en) | System and method for performing microseismic fracture operations | |
US11099289B2 (en) | Multivariate analysis of seismic data, microseismic data, and petrophysical properties in fracture modeling | |
CA2916371C (en) | Reservoir simulator, method and computer program product | |
US11401803B2 (en) | Determining fracture surface area in a well | |
US20150371345A1 (en) | System, Method and Computer Program Product for Predicting Well Production | |
US11789170B2 (en) | Induced seismicity | |
EP3347567B1 (en) | Automatic updating of well production models | |
CN104948176B (en) | A kind of method based on infiltration Magnification identification carbonate reservoir crack | |
Patterson et al. | Integration of microseismic data, completion data, and production data to characterize fracture geometry in the Permian Basin | |
Clarkson | Integration of rate-transient and microseismic analysis for unconventional gas reservoirs: where reservoir engineering meets geophysics | |
EP3221556A1 (en) | A combination model for predicting stiffness coefficients absent stoneley wave velocity data | |
Gaurav* et al. | Stimulated rock volume and estimated ultimate recovery | |
AU2016418346A1 (en) | Horizontal reservoir description systems | |
CN112394416B (en) | Heterogeneous fracture control reservoir prediction method and device | |
Grande et al. | Development of a Pore Pressure Workflow and Multi-Variate Depletion Flag for Horizontal Child Wells in the Eagle Ford Formation | |
CN114417587B (en) | Stratum pore pressure prediction method suitable for compact clastic rock stratum in low-pressure state | |
Lamberghini et al. | Performance Based Reservoir Characterization in a Tight Gas Reservoir System-Case Study from Lajas and Punta Rosada Formations in the Neuquen Basin, Argentina | |
Sarmah et al. | Characterization and production influence of geological facies in the Eagle Ford | |
Tandon | Identification of productive zones in unconventional reservoirs | |
Meeks et al. | Maximizing gas recovery from tight gas reservoirs in Trawick field | |
Chenglin et al. | Subsurface Visualization and Quantitative Mapping Service To Manage Production Steering and Reserve Assessment of Dynamic Remaining Oil | |
Wilson et al. | Integrated Modeling to Improve Well Performance in the Avalon Shale | |
Shrivastava et al. | Ensemble Based Workflow for Robust History Matching and Forecasting of Hydraulic Fractured Wells |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
TR01 | Transfer of patent right | ||
TR01 | Transfer of patent right |
Effective date of registration: 20250612 Address after: Room 1202, No. 22 Chaoyangmen North Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100728 Patentee after: Sinopec Petroleum Engineering Technology Service Co.,Ltd. Country or region after: China Patentee after: SINOPEC OILFIELD SERVICE JIANGHAN Corp. Patentee after: Sinopec Jingwei Co.,Ltd. Patentee after: Jianghan logging branch of Sinopec Jingwei Co.,Ltd. Address before: 100028 Chaoyang District, Beijing Hui Xin Street 6, Twelfth level. Patentee before: SINOPEC OILFIELD SERVICE Corp. Country or region before: China Patentee before: SINOPEC OILFIELD SERVICE JIANGHAN Corp. |