CA2280219A1 - Aircraft active anti-missile system (aaas) - Google Patents
Aircraft active anti-missile system (aaas) Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2280219A1 CA2280219A1 CA 2280219 CA2280219A CA2280219A1 CA 2280219 A1 CA2280219 A1 CA 2280219A1 CA 2280219 CA2280219 CA 2280219 CA 2280219 A CA2280219 A CA 2280219A CA 2280219 A1 CA2280219 A1 CA 2280219A1
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- aaas
- aircraft
- projectile
- active anti
- missile
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Classifications
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F41—WEAPONS
- F41G—WEAPON SIGHTS; AIMING
- F41G7/00—Direction control systems for self-propelled missiles
- F41G7/20—Direction control systems for self-propelled missiles based on continuous observation of target position
- F41G7/22—Homing guidance systems
- F41G7/224—Deceiving or protecting means
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F42—AMMUNITION; BLASTING
- F42B—EXPLOSIVE CHARGES, e.g. FOR BLASTING, FIREWORKS, AMMUNITION
- F42B12/00—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material
- F42B12/02—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect
- F42B12/20—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect of high-explosive type
- F42B12/22—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect of high-explosive type with fragmentation-hull construction
- F42B12/32—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect of high-explosive type with fragmentation-hull construction the hull or case comprising a plurality of discrete bodies, e.g. steel balls, embedded therein or disposed around the explosive charge
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F42—AMMUNITION; BLASTING
- F42C—AMMUNITION FUZES; ARMING OR SAFETY MEANS THEREFOR
- F42C13/00—Proximity fuzes; Fuzes for remote detonation
- F42C13/006—Proximity fuzes; Fuzes for remote detonation for non-guided, spinning, braked or gravity-driven weapons, e.g. parachute-braked sub-munitions
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
- Aiming, Guidance, Guns With A Light Source, Armor, Camouflage, And Targets (AREA)
Description
AIRCRAFT ACTIVE ANTI-MISSISLE SYSTEM (AAAS) INVENTOR: WEIZHEN CHAI
ADD: 5325, Sherbrooke West Apt 3, H4A1 V2, Montreal QC
Fax: 514-4838453 Email:lilychem@videotron.ca In modern warfare, the aircrafts mainly use interfering devices against attacks of missiles. In the past the fighters could use own high-G manoeuvre to evade the missiles. As the technologies of missiles improve greatly in 80sl90s, evading the missiles by high-G manoeuvre has become almost impossible, so that perhaps the only current measures against missile attack for aircraft could only depend on the interfering devices, such like infrared flares, electromagnetic wave interfering sys tem, etc. Though the warships have already been equipped with radar-controled multi-barrel canon system to defend itself by destroying the missiles, due to it's heavy weight & capacity it's impossible to equip the aircrafts with such systems.
This invention is give the aircrafts an active measure for defence by destroying the attacking missiles, called AIRCRAFT ACTIVE ANTI MISSILE SYSTEM, abbreviated as AAAS hereinafter.
The AAAS mainly consists of parachute(1), cables(2), projectile(3) &
container(4), see picture (A). Folded wings could be considered to fix onto the projectile to meet the de-tailed requirements. It'd depend on the test results whether it should use both the para-chute & the folded wings or just either of them. The next description is based on using both.
When the aircraft is chased by the missile from the tail, the parachute would be ejected to help pull out the projectile which is then ejected and the wings are opened. Both ends of the projectile are connected to the cable to the parachute & cable to the capstan in the container carried by the aircraft. So the projectile would roughly remain parallel (hori-zontal) to the centerline of the aircraft and move with the aircraft in the same direction.
When the attacking missile follow the manoeuvre of the aircra8 from the back and fly by the projectile, it'd be detected by the proximity fuze (electromagnetic wave), technology of which has been put to use for more than 50 years, and detonate the projectile to des-troy the missile with thousands of steel balls (or wolfram balls) controled by directional blasting which would prevent the aircraft from being hit. . See picture (B).
Compared with the Flak shells, the AAAS projectile needn't bear the great forces in the gun-barrel; With the modern tech., it's not difficult to make the projectile detonated only by the missile passing by., but not the aircraft in the front or the parachute at the back.
Assume the calibre of the projectile is about 155mm, the weight would be around 80kg.
The power of AAAS prajectile would be quite amazing while it's not a problem for an aircraft to carry 4-8 or more AAAS. Probably the aircraft such like Mirage without tail planes would easily carry more AAAS. For modern high-thrust jet aircrafts, a small-sized parachute and a projectile dragging behind probably would do little or nothing to its ma-noeuvre around Mach0.8-1.2. If test results show parachute unnecessary, then it'd do nothing to the manoervrability of the aircraft.
* For AAAS manoervrability of aircrafts is quite important, which could enable the air-craft to turn its tail to the missile to launch the projectile. For the heavy aircrafts, the AAAS would be less effective.
ADD: 5325, Sherbrooke West Apt 3, H4A1 V2, Montreal QC
Fax: 514-4838453 Email:lilychem@videotron.ca In modern warfare, the aircrafts mainly use interfering devices against attacks of missiles. In the past the fighters could use own high-G manoeuvre to evade the missiles. As the technologies of missiles improve greatly in 80sl90s, evading the missiles by high-G manoeuvre has become almost impossible, so that perhaps the only current measures against missile attack for aircraft could only depend on the interfering devices, such like infrared flares, electromagnetic wave interfering sys tem, etc. Though the warships have already been equipped with radar-controled multi-barrel canon system to defend itself by destroying the missiles, due to it's heavy weight & capacity it's impossible to equip the aircrafts with such systems.
This invention is give the aircrafts an active measure for defence by destroying the attacking missiles, called AIRCRAFT ACTIVE ANTI MISSILE SYSTEM, abbreviated as AAAS hereinafter.
The AAAS mainly consists of parachute(1), cables(2), projectile(3) &
container(4), see picture (A). Folded wings could be considered to fix onto the projectile to meet the de-tailed requirements. It'd depend on the test results whether it should use both the para-chute & the folded wings or just either of them. The next description is based on using both.
When the aircraft is chased by the missile from the tail, the parachute would be ejected to help pull out the projectile which is then ejected and the wings are opened. Both ends of the projectile are connected to the cable to the parachute & cable to the capstan in the container carried by the aircraft. So the projectile would roughly remain parallel (hori-zontal) to the centerline of the aircraft and move with the aircraft in the same direction.
When the attacking missile follow the manoeuvre of the aircra8 from the back and fly by the projectile, it'd be detected by the proximity fuze (electromagnetic wave), technology of which has been put to use for more than 50 years, and detonate the projectile to des-troy the missile with thousands of steel balls (or wolfram balls) controled by directional blasting which would prevent the aircraft from being hit. . See picture (B).
Compared with the Flak shells, the AAAS projectile needn't bear the great forces in the gun-barrel; With the modern tech., it's not difficult to make the projectile detonated only by the missile passing by., but not the aircraft in the front or the parachute at the back.
Assume the calibre of the projectile is about 155mm, the weight would be around 80kg.
The power of AAAS prajectile would be quite amazing while it's not a problem for an aircraft to carry 4-8 or more AAAS. Probably the aircraft such like Mirage without tail planes would easily carry more AAAS. For modern high-thrust jet aircrafts, a small-sized parachute and a projectile dragging behind probably would do little or nothing to its ma-noeuvre around Mach0.8-1.2. If test results show parachute unnecessary, then it'd do nothing to the manoervrability of the aircraft.
* For AAAS manoervrability of aircrafts is quite important, which could enable the air-craft to turn its tail to the missile to launch the projectile. For the heavy aircrafts, the AAAS would be less effective.
Claims
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CA 2280219 CA2280219A1 (en) | 1999-08-12 | 1999-08-12 | Aircraft active anti-missile system (aaas) |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CA 2280219 CA2280219A1 (en) | 1999-08-12 | 1999-08-12 | Aircraft active anti-missile system (aaas) |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CA2280219A1 true CA2280219A1 (en) | 2001-02-12 |
Family
ID=4163960
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA 2280219 Abandoned CA2280219A1 (en) | 1999-08-12 | 1999-08-12 | Aircraft active anti-missile system (aaas) |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CA (1) | CA2280219A1 (en) |
-
1999
- 1999-08-12 CA CA 2280219 patent/CA2280219A1/en not_active Abandoned
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6957602B1 (en) | Parachute active protection apparatus | |
US9074858B2 (en) | Projectile-deployed countermeasure system | |
US9528802B1 (en) | Indirect fire munition non-lethal cargo carrier mortar | |
US3088403A (en) | Rocket assisted torpedo | |
JP2003534525A (en) | Missile direction control | |
ZA200400071B (en) | Projectile for radially deploying sub-projectiles. | |
US12117276B2 (en) | Low-observable projectile | |
CA2363424C (en) | Door breaching device with safety adapter | |
RU2527610C2 (en) | Two-stage antitank guided missile | |
US5368255A (en) | Aerotumbling missile | |
KR20050039740A (en) | Weapons platform construction | |
CN101936686A (en) | Missile-preventing net bomb | |
CN101554923A (en) | Airplane missile defense system | |
ZA200208151B (en) | Attack aircraft. | |
CA2280219A1 (en) | Aircraft active anti-missile system (aaas) | |
Tripathi | Weaponisation and militarisation of space | |
RU2705730C1 (en) | Method of aircraft protection against missile damage in rear hemisphere | |
US5177316A (en) | Process and apparatus for attacking rotating wing aircraft | |
Mowthorpe | The Soviet/Russian antisatellite (ASAT) programme during the cold war and beyond | |
RU2477832C2 (en) | Anti-ship missile | |
FODOR | The Threat Posed by Modern UAS, Illustrated by the war in Nagorno-Karabakh | |
JP2022087361A (en) | Intercepting device for moving object | |
CLARK et al. | The Missing Pieces of a Kerch Bridge Strike | |
KR101594441B1 (en) | Apparatus for destroying guide missile | |
CN116147421A (en) | Towed hard-killing active protection weapon and launching method |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
FZDE | Dead |