CA1341071C - Metallic glass alloys for mechanically resonant target surveillance systems - Google Patents
Metallic glass alloys for mechanically resonant target surveillance systemsInfo
- Publication number
- CA1341071C CA1341071C CA000610868A CA610868A CA1341071C CA 1341071 C CA1341071 C CA 1341071C CA 000610868 A CA000610868 A CA 000610868A CA 610868 A CA610868 A CA 610868A CA 1341071 C CA1341071 C CA 1341071C
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- ranges
- zero
- khz
- alloys
- ring down
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08B—SIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
- G08B13/00—Burglar, theft or intruder alarms
- G08B13/22—Electrical actuation
- G08B13/24—Electrical actuation by interference with electromagnetic field distribution
- G08B13/2402—Electronic Article Surveillance [EAS], i.e. systems using tags for detecting removal of a tagged item from a secure area, e.g. tags for detecting shoplifting
- G08B13/2405—Electronic Article Surveillance [EAS], i.e. systems using tags for detecting removal of a tagged item from a secure area, e.g. tags for detecting shoplifting characterised by the tag technology used
- G08B13/2408—Electronic Article Surveillance [EAS], i.e. systems using tags for detecting removal of a tagged item from a secure area, e.g. tags for detecting shoplifting characterised by the tag technology used using ferromagnetic tags
- G08B13/2411—Tag deactivation
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08B—SIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
- G08B13/00—Burglar, theft or intruder alarms
- G08B13/22—Electrical actuation
- G08B13/24—Electrical actuation by interference with electromagnetic field distribution
- G08B13/2402—Electronic Article Surveillance [EAS], i.e. systems using tags for detecting removal of a tagged item from a secure area, e.g. tags for detecting shoplifting
- G08B13/2428—Tag details
- G08B13/2437—Tag layered structure, processes for making layered tags
- G08B13/2442—Tag materials and material properties thereof, e.g. magnetic material details
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01F—MAGNETS; INDUCTANCES; TRANSFORMERS; SELECTION OF MATERIALS FOR THEIR MAGNETIC PROPERTIES
- H01F1/00—Magnets or magnetic bodies characterised by the magnetic materials therefor; Selection of materials for their magnetic properties
- H01F1/01—Magnets or magnetic bodies characterised by the magnetic materials therefor; Selection of materials for their magnetic properties of inorganic materials
- H01F1/03—Magnets or magnetic bodies characterised by the magnetic materials therefor; Selection of materials for their magnetic properties of inorganic materials characterised by their coercivity
- H01F1/12—Magnets or magnetic bodies characterised by the magnetic materials therefor; Selection of materials for their magnetic properties of inorganic materials characterised by their coercivity of soft-magnetic materials
- H01F1/14—Magnets or magnetic bodies characterised by the magnetic materials therefor; Selection of materials for their magnetic properties of inorganic materials characterised by their coercivity of soft-magnetic materials metals or alloys
- H01F1/147—Alloys characterised by their composition
- H01F1/153—Amorphous metallic alloys, e.g. glassy metals
- H01F1/15308—Amorphous metallic alloys, e.g. glassy metals based on Fe/Ni
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Electromagnetism (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
- Computer Security & Cryptography (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Dispersion Chemistry (AREA)
- Power Engineering (AREA)
- Soft Magnetic Materials (AREA)
- Burglar Alarm Systems (AREA)
Abstract
A magnetic metallic glass alloy evidencing a low rate of damping of mechanically resonant oscillations, is suitable for use in mechanically resonant target surveillance systems. The alloy has a composition described by tree formula F e a N i b M c B d S i e C f, where M is one of molybdenum and chromium, "a" - "f" are in atom percent, "a" ranges from about 39 to about 41, "b"
ranges from about 37 to about 39, "c" ranges from 0 to about 3, "d" ranges from about 17 to about 19, and "e"
and "f" range from 0 to about 2, with the provisos that (i) only one of "c", "e", and "f" can be zero, (ii) "e"
cannot be zero if "f"' is not zero, and (iii) "f" can be zero only when M is Cr. A ribbon, wire or sheet of this alloy, having mechanical resonance in a range of frequencies from about 55 kHz to about 60 kHz, evidences a ring down time of at least about 3 ms.
ranges from about 37 to about 39, "c" ranges from 0 to about 3, "d" ranges from about 17 to about 19, and "e"
and "f" range from 0 to about 2, with the provisos that (i) only one of "c", "e", and "f" can be zero, (ii) "e"
cannot be zero if "f"' is not zero, and (iii) "f" can be zero only when M is Cr. A ribbon, wire or sheet of this alloy, having mechanical resonance in a range of frequencies from about 55 kHz to about 60 kHz, evidences a ring down time of at least about 3 ms.
Description
134107'f METALL:LC GLASS ALLOYS FOR MECHANICALLY
RESONANT TARGET SURVEILLANCE SYSTEMS
13ACKGR~OUND OF THE INDENTION
1. Field of the Invention This invention relates to metallic glass alloys;
and more particularly to metallic glass alloys suited for use in mechanically resonant targets of article surveillance systems.
RESONANT TARGET SURVEILLANCE SYSTEMS
13ACKGR~OUND OF THE INDENTION
1. Field of the Invention This invention relates to metallic glass alloys;
and more particularly to metallic glass alloys suited for use in mechanically resonant targets of article surveillance systems.
2. Description of the prior art Numerous articles surveillance systems are available in the market today t~o help identify and/or secure various animate and inanimate objects. Identification of personnel for controlled access to limited areas, and securing articles of merchandise against pilferage are examples of purposes for which such systems are employed.
An essential component of all surveillance systems is a sensing unit, or' "target", that is attached to the object to be detected.. Other components of the system include a transmitter and a receiver that are suitably disposed in an "interrogation" zone. When the object carrying the target enters the interrogation zone, the functional part of the target responds to a signal from the transmitter, which response is detected in the receiver. The information contained in the response signal is then processed for actions appropriate to the aPPlication: denial of access, triggering of an alarm, and the like.
Surveillance sy~~tems that employ detection modes incorporating the fundamental mechanical resonance frequency of the target material are especially advantageous systems, in that they offer a combination of high detection sensitivity, high operating reliability, and low operating costs. Examples of such ~34~~71 systems are disclosed in U.S. Patent Nos. 4,510,489 and 4,510,490 (herE~inafter the '489 and '490 patents).
The target; in such systems is a strip, or a plurality of si;rips, of known length of a ferromagnetic material, packaged with a harder ferromagnet (material with a higher c:oercivity) that provides a biasing field to establish pE~ak ma;gnetomechanical coupling. The ferromagnetic raateri.al is preferably a metallic glass alloy ribbon, since the efficiency of magnetomechanical coupling in these alloys is very high. The mechanical resonance frequency of the target material is dictated essentially by the length of the alloy ribbon and the biasing field strength. When an interrogating signal tuned to this resonance frequency is encountered, the target materia:~'. responds with a large signal field which is detected by the receiver. The large signal field is attributable to an enhanced'magnetic permeability of the target material. at the resonance frequency. Various target configur~ation~s and systems for interrogation and detection that utili:ae the above principle have been taught in the ''489 and '490 patents.
In one particularly useful system, the target material is ex<:ited into oscillations by pulses, or bursts, of signal at its resonance frequency generated bY the transmii;ter. When the exciting pulse is over, the target matE:rial will undergo damped oscillations at its resonance frequency, i.e., the target material "rings down" following the termination of the exciting pulse. The receiver "listens" to the response signal during this ring down period. Under this arrangement, the surveillance sy stem is relatively immune to interferences from various radiated or power line conducted sour<:es and, therefore, the potential for false alarms i;; essentially eliminated.
A broad range o:P alloys have been~claimed in the '489 and '490 patents as suitable for target material, for the variou;~ detection systems disclosed. Other metallic glass alloys bearing high permeabilities are disclosed in U.S. Pat;ent No. 4,152,144; the compositions of the alloys claimed in this patent fall within the broad range referred to above.
However, for the particular detection system described immediately above, metallic glass alloys with long ring down times are highly desirable so that detection efficiencies in the system may be improved.
Of these, glassy metal alloys that are economical to produce would offer an additional advantage.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention provides magnetic alloys that are at least about 70% glassy and are characterized by long ring down times in resonance target applications.
Such alloys evidence a low rate of damping of resonant oscillations, following the termination of an exciting pulse. Generally stated, the glassy metal alloys of the invention have a composition described by the formula FeaNibMcBdSieCf, where M is one of molybdenum and chromium, "a" - "f" are in atom percent, "a" ranges from about 39 to about 41, "b" ranges from about 37 to about 39, "c" ranges from O to about 3~ "d" ranges from about 17 to about 19, and "'e" and "f" range from 0 to about 2, with the provisos that (i) only one of "c", "e" and "f"
can be zero, (ii) "e"' cannot be zero if "f" is not zero, and (iii) "f" can be zero only when M is Cr. Ribbons of these alloys, when mechanically resonant at~frequencies ranging from about 55 kHz to about 60 kHz, evidence ring down times of at lea~;t about 3 ms. Alternatively, ribbons of these alloys, when mechanically resonant at frequencies ranging from about 21 kHz to about 25 kHz, evidence ring down times of at least about 7 ms.
The metallic glasses of this invention are.
especially suitable for use as the active elements in targets associated with surveillance systems that employ resonance frequency excitation and detection modes.
Other uses may be found in special magnetic amplifiers, relay cores, ground fault interrupters and the like.
~ 3~ ~ ~~ T
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The invention wall be more fully understood and further advantages w:i.ll become apparent when reference is made to the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments of the invention and the accompanying drawing, which is a schematic representation of thE~ exciting signal pulse and the resultant response signal of the target material, the envelopes of these signals being indicated by the thick dashed and thick conl~inuous lines respectively, and wherein the definitions of the peak response voltage, Ilr, and the ring down time, tr, of the target material are also provided.
DESCRIPTION ()F THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
In accordo,nce with the present invention, there are provided magnetic metallic glass alloys that are characterized by long ring down times in resonance target applications. These alloys evidence a low rate of damping of resonant oscillations, following the termination of an exciting pulse. Generally stated, the glassy metal alloys of the invention have a composition described by the formula FeaNibMcBdSieCf, where M is one of molybdenum and chromium, "a" - "f" are in atom percent, "a" ranges from about 39 to about 41, "b"
ranges from about 37 to about 39, "c" ranges from 0 to about 3, "d" ranges from about 17 to about 19, and "e"
and "f" range from 0 to about 2, with the provisos that ( i ) only one of "c" , "e" and "f" can be zero, ( i i ) "e"
cannot be zero if "f" is not zero, and (iii) "f" can be zero only when M is Cr. The purity of the above compositions i~~ that found in normal commercial practice. Ribt~ons of these alloys, at lengths ranging from about 35 mm to about 40 mm exhibit mechanical resonance in a range of frequencies from about 55 kHz to about 60 kHz. When thus resonant, such ribbons evidence ring down time, of ai; least about 3 ms. Alternatively, 34 1 ~7 1 _5_ ribbons of these alloys, at lengths ranging from about 85 mm to about 100 mm exhibit mechanical resonance in a range of frequencies from about 21 kHz to about 25 kHz;
and, when so resonant, evidence ring down times of at least about 7 ms.
Ribbons having mechanical resonances in the range from about 55 kHz to about 60 kHz are preferred. Such ribbons are short enough to be used as disposable target materials. In addition, the resonance signals of such ribbons are well separated from the audio and commercial radio frequency ranges.
Most metallic glass alloys that are outside of the scope of this invention typically ring down, after excitation of a resonance in a frequency range from about 55 kHz to about; 60 kHz, in times shorter than about 2 ms. These ring down times are unacceptable because of the increased difficulties associated with the detection of a response signal of reasonable strength within such short time intervals.
There are a few metallic glass alloys outside of the scope of this invention that do show ring down times comparable to those from the alloys of this invention.
However, these alloys invariably contain high levels of molybdenum. Aside from the increased raw material costs associated with Mo, t:he yield of good magnetic ribbon, suitable for use in resonance targets, from casts of alloys with high Mo <;ontent tends to be generally poor. The alloys of the present invention offer the advantageous combination of long ring down times and economy in production of usable ribbon.
Apart from the Ease in detection facilitated by the longer ring down time's in the alloys of this invention, such longer time intErvals provide an additional, and advantageous, feature in the detection system in that the receiver may "listen" to the sample response more than once during the same ring down cycle, for confirmation purposes.
1341 ~~ 1 Examples of metallic glasses of the invention in elude Fe~ONi38Mo2B18Si1C1, Fe~ONi38Mo3B18Si0.5C0.5~
Fe~ONi38Mo1B18Si1.5C1.5, Fe~ONi38Mo2.5817.5S11C1~
Fe~ONi38Mo1.5818.5S11C1~ Fe~40N138Mo3817S11C1~
Fe~ONi38Cr2B18Si2, and Fe~ONi38B18Si2C2, where all numbers are in atomic' percent.
The definition c>f the ring down time, as used in the context of the description of this invention, is provided in the Figure. This Figure also illustrates, schematically, the interrogation and detection modes of a surveillance system wherein the alloys of this invention are beneficially employed.
The target material is exposed.to a burst of exciting signal of constant amplitude, referred to as the exciting pulse, tuned to the frequency of mechanical resonance of the target material. The exciting pulse is outlined in thick da~~hed lines in the Figure, and the peak-to-peak amplitude of the pulse is denoted by the quantity V0. Although the principle of operation of the surveillance system i.s not dependent on the shape of the waves comprising the exciting pulse, the wave form of this signal is usually sinusoidal. The target material begins to resonate under this excitation.
The physical principle governing this resonance may be summarized as follows: When a ferromagnetic material is subjected to a mad;netizing magnetic field, it experiences a change in length. The fractional change in length, over the original length, of the material is referred to as magnet,ostriction and denoted by the symbol a . A positive signature is assigned to a if an elongation occurs parallel to the magnetizing magnetic field.
When a ribbon of a material with a positive magnetostriction is subjected to a sinusoidally varying external field, applied along its length, the ribbon will undergo periodic; changes in length, i.e., the ribbon will be driven into oscillations. The external field may be generated, for example, by a solenoid ~ 341 07 ~
carrying a sinu~soida7Lly varying current. The frequency of the ribbon oscillations will be twice that of the driving field, since the magnetostriction is insensitive to the direction of t:he driving field at any given instant. In other words, as long as the absolute magnitude of the driving field is non-zero, there will be a change in the ribbon length. Magnetomechanical resonance occurs when the frequency of the driving field is one-half of fr, the mechanical resonance frequency of the ribbon. Th.e frequency fr is given by the relation fr - (112L)(E/D)0.5, where L is the ribbon length, E is the Young's modulus of the ribbon, and D is the density of the ribbon.
However, if a dc; magnetic field, referred to.as the biasing field, of suitable strength were imposed on the material concurrently with the ac field, the frequency of ribbon oscillations will be that of the driving ac field. The reason for this is that the material responds magnetostri<;tively to the net instantaneous magnetic field acting; upon it, and as long as this net field stays non-zero, the material will oscillate about the position where the constant do field has placed it. Apart from providing a sensitivity to the direction of the instantaneous ac field, the biasing field serves other purposes as well.
Magnetostrictive effects are observed in a ferromagnetic material only when the magnetization of the material proceeds through domain rotation. No magnetostriction is observed when motion of plane parallel domain. walls is the mechanism for magnetization. The biasing field places the material at, or beyond, the ";nee" of hysteresis loop of the material, in which magnetic state the motion of plane parallel walls has been expended, and further magnetization of the sample occurs mainly by domain rotation. The efficiency of magnetomechanical response from the material ha:; thus been improved. It is also well understood in the art that a biasing field serves .8.
to change the e~ffecti.ve value for E in a ferromagnetic material so that the mechanical resonance frequency of the material ma.y be modified by a suitable choice of strength for th.e biasing field.
Summarizir,.g the above, a ribbon of a positively magnetostrictive ferromagnetic material, when exposed to a driving ac magnetic: field in the presence of a do biasing field, will oscillate at the frequency of the driving ac field, and when this frequency coincides with the mechanical resonance frequency, fr, of the material, the ribbon will resonate and provide increased response signal amplitudes. l:n practice, the biasing field is provided by a ferromagnet with a higher coercivity than the target material present in the "target package".
The amplitude of the response signal, or voltage, from the target matec~ial increases through the duration of the exciting pulse (as dictated by inertia), and eventually reches a stable, constant value if the exciting pulse lasts for a long enough time. The peak-to-peak height of this stable amplitude is represented as Vr in the Figure. Once the exciting pulse is turned off, the target material "rings down", i.e., the amplitude of mechanical oscillations in the material and, consequently, the response voltage amplitude reduce to zero over a period of time. In other words, in the absence of an excitation, the~motion of the excited target material is damped. The profile of the amplitude of the target responae voltage is outlined in thick solid lines in the Figure.
The moment when the exciting pulse is turned off is defined as time t - O, and the monitoring of the sample response signal commences some time after t - 0, during the ring down period. The ring down time, tr, of the target material is defined, in the notation of the Figure, as the instant when the peak-to-peak target response voltage is 10~ of Vr. As used herein, the term "ring down time" means the time interval during which the amplitude of response from the ribbon is reduced to 1 341 0~ 1 about 10% of that amplitude extant when an exciting pulse applied to the ribbon is terminated, such time interval commencing at the instant of termination of the exciting pulse.
The ring down time, tr, is approximately a linear function of the ribbon length, L; the longer the ribbon, the longer is the ring down time. Without being bound by any theory, it is believed that the increase in tr with increasing L is associated with the lowering of the mechanical resonance frequency in longer ribbons. The same amount of energy takes longer to dissipate at lower frequencies.
The magnitude of the response voltage sensed by a receiver is dependent; on how that receiver is disposed within the system. F'or example, a receiver in a system requiring the inserti.an of an identification card into a slot will perceive a magnitude for Vr that is different from that perceived by a receiver in a system designed for employment at they exit doors of a department store, even though identical. target materials are used in both systems.
There are no requirements on the magnitude of Vr as far as the choice of target material is concerned. It is, however, understood that the value for Vr should be such that the response voltage is of sufficient strength to be detected by they receiver at the instant, during the ring down period, when the receiver "listens" to the target material. Henceforth, for the reasons detailed immediately above, no further reference to Vr will be made in the description of this invention.
Table I lists tree values for tr obtained from various metallic gla~~s alloys that are outside the scope of this invention but, which happen to lie within the scope of composition; claimed in the '489 and '190 Patents. With the e~s:ception of the last named alloy, the ring down times for the alloys in this Table are short. This last named alloy is prone to the difficulties associated with the casting of alloys with high molybdenum contents.
TABLE I
Ring down times, tr, obtained from ribbons of metallic glass alloy: that are outside the scope of this invention. Representative compositions from a variety of metallic glass sy~>tems have been listed. Except as noted, these ribbons have mechanical resonance frequencies, fr, in the range from about 55 kHz to 60 kHz.
Composition (at.~~) tr(ms) Fe78B13Si9 1.2 Fe81B~3.5S13.5C2 1.5 Fe66Co18B15S11 1.0 Fe~ONi~p820 5.2 Fe~2Ni38Mo2B18 1.8 Fe~ONi38Mo~B18 4.3 Ribbon with fr of about 22 kHz.
It has been found that the combination of the Specific elements in the alloys of this invention is necessary for the attainment of long ring down times.
Short ring down timed, result from metallic glass alloys that have any one of these elements absent from their composition. Table I:I lists the ring down times obtained from representative metallic glass alloys wherein both Si and C. are absent, and Table III contains a similar list derived from alloys with no C. The alloys in these Tables are outside the scope of this invention, and the undesirable ring down times obtained from these alloys are self evident from these Tables.
It is understood from the Tables II and III that the alloy Fe~0iJi38Mo4B18 is unique in terms of its long ring down time. A lowering of the molybdenum content to make the alloy more economical to produce invariably compromises the ring down time. It will be further understood frora the 'Tables I to III that the long ring down times obtained in the alloys of this invention, with the stated combination of the specific elements, TAUT L' TT
Aing down times, tr, obtained from ribbons of metallic glass alloy's containing Fe, Ni, Mo, and B, but no Si or C. E~ccept .as noted, these ribbons have mechanical resonance frequencies, fr, in the range from about 21 kHz to about 23 kHz.
Composition (at.'~) tr (ms) Fe~ONi38Mo3B19 6.0 Fe40N139Mo;3B18 6.0 Fe~1Ni38Mo3B18 1.8 (~) Ribbon with fr of about 58 kHz.
TART G' TTT
Ring down times, tr, obtained from ribbons of metallic glass alloys containing Fe, Ni, Mo, B, and Si, but no C. These ribbons have mechanical resonances in the range of frequencies from about 21 kHz to about 23 kHz.
Composition (at.~) tr (ms) Fe~ONi38Mo1+B17S11 2.6 Fe~ONi3gMo11B16S12 5.5 are much longer than the ring down times of previous target materia~.s.
The following examples are presented to provide a more complete understanding of the invention. The specific techn:lques, conditions and reported.data set forth to illustrate the principles and practice of the invention are exemplary and should not be construed as limiting the scope o:f the invention. All alloy compositions describ~sd in the examples are nominal compositions.
EXAMPLES
Example 1: Fe-Ni-Mo-B-Si-C metallic glasses 1. Sample Preparation Glassy met: al alloys in the Fe-Ni-Mo-B-Si-C family, designated as samples no. 1 to 13 in Table IU, were rapidly q»enched from the melt following the techniques taught by Narasimhan im U.S. Patent No. 4,142,571, All casts were made in a vacuum chamber, using 1 341 ~7 1 _13_ 25 to 100 g me7_ts. 'The resulting ribbons, typically 25 to 30 um thick and a bout 6 mm wide, were determined to be free of significant crystallinity by x-ray diffractometry using Cu-Ka radiation and differential scanning calori:metry. Each of the alloys was at least 70~ glassy and;, in many instances, the alloys were more than 90~ glassy. Ribbons of these glassy metal alloys were strong, shiny, hard, and ductile.
2~ Characterization of response as resonance targets Ribbon samples, cut to about 38 mm in length, were used for the characterization of ring down times in the various alloys" Th is ribbon length is appropriate to a mechanical resonance frequency ranging from about 55 kHz to about 60 kHz in these alloys. The biasing do field and the driving; ac field were obtained from two solenoids that were ~~oaxially configured. The biasing solenoid, about; 0.38 m in length, had a turn density of about 300 turns/m, and the driving solenoid was about 0.3 m long with a turn density of about 1440 turns/m.
The sample was placed on the axis of these solenoids, at about the midd7_e of their length. The sample response was sensed through a pick-up coil comprising between about 100 and "'~20 tu:rns of wire wound closely around the sample and covering the entire ribbon length. The sample responsE; (picl'~c-up signal) and the driving ac signal were sirnultan~eously monitored on an oscilloscope screen.
An initia_L estimation of the resonance frequencies of these as-cast ribbon samples was made by fixing the do biasing fie:Ld at about X40 A/m and scanning the frequency of a driving ac field of a constant amplitude of about 8 A/m, Peaks in the respective response signals identified t:he resonance frequencies, which were found to range from .about 55 to kHz to about 60 kHz.
Following the above procedure, for any given sample, a pulse was sent through the exciting solenoid, which pulse contained a counted number of waves at the resonance frequency determined earlier as appropriate for the sample. The number of waves, or, equivalently, the duration of the pulse, was adjusted to be sufficient to ensure that the sample response had reached a stable value. Adjustments t:o the driving frequency, and to the biasing field ~~trengt;h, were also made, when necessary, to obtain a ma~s:imum sample response signal. Peak sample responses were obtained with the biasing field ranging from about X400 A/m to about 600 A/m, the driving frequency ranging from about 56 kHz to about 58 kHz, and the exciting pulse comprising between about 80 and 100 waves.
The trace~~ on the oscilloscope screen were as schematically illustc~ated in the Figure. As described above, the ring down time was determined as the time required for the sample response amplitude to reduce to 10~ of the amplitude at the instant the exciting pulse was turned off. Tab7Le IV below lists the ring down times obtained.from these 38 mm long as-cast metallic glass ribbons.
Ring down times, tr, obtained from various Fe-Ni-Mo-B-Si-C meta~.lic glasses belonging to this invention. Me<;hanical resonance frequencies range from about 55 kHz to about 60 kHz.
Composition No. Fe -- Ni - Mo - B - Si - C tr (ms) 1 at 40 - - 38 2 - 1 9 - 0 - 0 5 . - . . 5 .
% 5 3 wt.% 45.8 - 45.7 3.9 4.2 - 0.3 - 0.1 - - -2 at.% 40 . _ 3g _ 2 18.5 - 1 - 0.5 7.5 ~ - .
wt.% 45.7 - 45.6 3.9 4.1 - 0.6 - 0.1 - - -153 at.% 40 . _ 3g 3 - 18' - 0.5 - 0.5 4.7 ~ _ wt.% 45.0 - 44.9 5.8 3.9 - 0.3 - 0.1 - - -4 at.% 40 . . 38' - 1.5 18.5 - 1~ - 1. 6.3 -wt.% 46.1 - 46.0 3.0 4.1 - 0.6 - 0.2 - - -5 at 40 . - 38 - 1 18 - 1 - 1 5.
. - . . . 0 % 5 5 -wt.% 46.0 - 45.9 - 3.0 4.0 - 0.9 - 0.2 - ~ - .
. ~
An essential component of all surveillance systems is a sensing unit, or' "target", that is attached to the object to be detected.. Other components of the system include a transmitter and a receiver that are suitably disposed in an "interrogation" zone. When the object carrying the target enters the interrogation zone, the functional part of the target responds to a signal from the transmitter, which response is detected in the receiver. The information contained in the response signal is then processed for actions appropriate to the aPPlication: denial of access, triggering of an alarm, and the like.
Surveillance sy~~tems that employ detection modes incorporating the fundamental mechanical resonance frequency of the target material are especially advantageous systems, in that they offer a combination of high detection sensitivity, high operating reliability, and low operating costs. Examples of such ~34~~71 systems are disclosed in U.S. Patent Nos. 4,510,489 and 4,510,490 (herE~inafter the '489 and '490 patents).
The target; in such systems is a strip, or a plurality of si;rips, of known length of a ferromagnetic material, packaged with a harder ferromagnet (material with a higher c:oercivity) that provides a biasing field to establish pE~ak ma;gnetomechanical coupling. The ferromagnetic raateri.al is preferably a metallic glass alloy ribbon, since the efficiency of magnetomechanical coupling in these alloys is very high. The mechanical resonance frequency of the target material is dictated essentially by the length of the alloy ribbon and the biasing field strength. When an interrogating signal tuned to this resonance frequency is encountered, the target materia:~'. responds with a large signal field which is detected by the receiver. The large signal field is attributable to an enhanced'magnetic permeability of the target material. at the resonance frequency. Various target configur~ation~s and systems for interrogation and detection that utili:ae the above principle have been taught in the ''489 and '490 patents.
In one particularly useful system, the target material is ex<:ited into oscillations by pulses, or bursts, of signal at its resonance frequency generated bY the transmii;ter. When the exciting pulse is over, the target matE:rial will undergo damped oscillations at its resonance frequency, i.e., the target material "rings down" following the termination of the exciting pulse. The receiver "listens" to the response signal during this ring down period. Under this arrangement, the surveillance sy stem is relatively immune to interferences from various radiated or power line conducted sour<:es and, therefore, the potential for false alarms i;; essentially eliminated.
A broad range o:P alloys have been~claimed in the '489 and '490 patents as suitable for target material, for the variou;~ detection systems disclosed. Other metallic glass alloys bearing high permeabilities are disclosed in U.S. Pat;ent No. 4,152,144; the compositions of the alloys claimed in this patent fall within the broad range referred to above.
However, for the particular detection system described immediately above, metallic glass alloys with long ring down times are highly desirable so that detection efficiencies in the system may be improved.
Of these, glassy metal alloys that are economical to produce would offer an additional advantage.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention provides magnetic alloys that are at least about 70% glassy and are characterized by long ring down times in resonance target applications.
Such alloys evidence a low rate of damping of resonant oscillations, following the termination of an exciting pulse. Generally stated, the glassy metal alloys of the invention have a composition described by the formula FeaNibMcBdSieCf, where M is one of molybdenum and chromium, "a" - "f" are in atom percent, "a" ranges from about 39 to about 41, "b" ranges from about 37 to about 39, "c" ranges from O to about 3~ "d" ranges from about 17 to about 19, and "'e" and "f" range from 0 to about 2, with the provisos that (i) only one of "c", "e" and "f"
can be zero, (ii) "e"' cannot be zero if "f" is not zero, and (iii) "f" can be zero only when M is Cr. Ribbons of these alloys, when mechanically resonant at~frequencies ranging from about 55 kHz to about 60 kHz, evidence ring down times of at lea~;t about 3 ms. Alternatively, ribbons of these alloys, when mechanically resonant at frequencies ranging from about 21 kHz to about 25 kHz, evidence ring down times of at least about 7 ms.
The metallic glasses of this invention are.
especially suitable for use as the active elements in targets associated with surveillance systems that employ resonance frequency excitation and detection modes.
Other uses may be found in special magnetic amplifiers, relay cores, ground fault interrupters and the like.
~ 3~ ~ ~~ T
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The invention wall be more fully understood and further advantages w:i.ll become apparent when reference is made to the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments of the invention and the accompanying drawing, which is a schematic representation of thE~ exciting signal pulse and the resultant response signal of the target material, the envelopes of these signals being indicated by the thick dashed and thick conl~inuous lines respectively, and wherein the definitions of the peak response voltage, Ilr, and the ring down time, tr, of the target material are also provided.
DESCRIPTION ()F THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
In accordo,nce with the present invention, there are provided magnetic metallic glass alloys that are characterized by long ring down times in resonance target applications. These alloys evidence a low rate of damping of resonant oscillations, following the termination of an exciting pulse. Generally stated, the glassy metal alloys of the invention have a composition described by the formula FeaNibMcBdSieCf, where M is one of molybdenum and chromium, "a" - "f" are in atom percent, "a" ranges from about 39 to about 41, "b"
ranges from about 37 to about 39, "c" ranges from 0 to about 3, "d" ranges from about 17 to about 19, and "e"
and "f" range from 0 to about 2, with the provisos that ( i ) only one of "c" , "e" and "f" can be zero, ( i i ) "e"
cannot be zero if "f" is not zero, and (iii) "f" can be zero only when M is Cr. The purity of the above compositions i~~ that found in normal commercial practice. Ribt~ons of these alloys, at lengths ranging from about 35 mm to about 40 mm exhibit mechanical resonance in a range of frequencies from about 55 kHz to about 60 kHz. When thus resonant, such ribbons evidence ring down time, of ai; least about 3 ms. Alternatively, 34 1 ~7 1 _5_ ribbons of these alloys, at lengths ranging from about 85 mm to about 100 mm exhibit mechanical resonance in a range of frequencies from about 21 kHz to about 25 kHz;
and, when so resonant, evidence ring down times of at least about 7 ms.
Ribbons having mechanical resonances in the range from about 55 kHz to about 60 kHz are preferred. Such ribbons are short enough to be used as disposable target materials. In addition, the resonance signals of such ribbons are well separated from the audio and commercial radio frequency ranges.
Most metallic glass alloys that are outside of the scope of this invention typically ring down, after excitation of a resonance in a frequency range from about 55 kHz to about; 60 kHz, in times shorter than about 2 ms. These ring down times are unacceptable because of the increased difficulties associated with the detection of a response signal of reasonable strength within such short time intervals.
There are a few metallic glass alloys outside of the scope of this invention that do show ring down times comparable to those from the alloys of this invention.
However, these alloys invariably contain high levels of molybdenum. Aside from the increased raw material costs associated with Mo, t:he yield of good magnetic ribbon, suitable for use in resonance targets, from casts of alloys with high Mo <;ontent tends to be generally poor. The alloys of the present invention offer the advantageous combination of long ring down times and economy in production of usable ribbon.
Apart from the Ease in detection facilitated by the longer ring down time's in the alloys of this invention, such longer time intErvals provide an additional, and advantageous, feature in the detection system in that the receiver may "listen" to the sample response more than once during the same ring down cycle, for confirmation purposes.
1341 ~~ 1 Examples of metallic glasses of the invention in elude Fe~ONi38Mo2B18Si1C1, Fe~ONi38Mo3B18Si0.5C0.5~
Fe~ONi38Mo1B18Si1.5C1.5, Fe~ONi38Mo2.5817.5S11C1~
Fe~ONi38Mo1.5818.5S11C1~ Fe~40N138Mo3817S11C1~
Fe~ONi38Cr2B18Si2, and Fe~ONi38B18Si2C2, where all numbers are in atomic' percent.
The definition c>f the ring down time, as used in the context of the description of this invention, is provided in the Figure. This Figure also illustrates, schematically, the interrogation and detection modes of a surveillance system wherein the alloys of this invention are beneficially employed.
The target material is exposed.to a burst of exciting signal of constant amplitude, referred to as the exciting pulse, tuned to the frequency of mechanical resonance of the target material. The exciting pulse is outlined in thick da~~hed lines in the Figure, and the peak-to-peak amplitude of the pulse is denoted by the quantity V0. Although the principle of operation of the surveillance system i.s not dependent on the shape of the waves comprising the exciting pulse, the wave form of this signal is usually sinusoidal. The target material begins to resonate under this excitation.
The physical principle governing this resonance may be summarized as follows: When a ferromagnetic material is subjected to a mad;netizing magnetic field, it experiences a change in length. The fractional change in length, over the original length, of the material is referred to as magnet,ostriction and denoted by the symbol a . A positive signature is assigned to a if an elongation occurs parallel to the magnetizing magnetic field.
When a ribbon of a material with a positive magnetostriction is subjected to a sinusoidally varying external field, applied along its length, the ribbon will undergo periodic; changes in length, i.e., the ribbon will be driven into oscillations. The external field may be generated, for example, by a solenoid ~ 341 07 ~
carrying a sinu~soida7Lly varying current. The frequency of the ribbon oscillations will be twice that of the driving field, since the magnetostriction is insensitive to the direction of t:he driving field at any given instant. In other words, as long as the absolute magnitude of the driving field is non-zero, there will be a change in the ribbon length. Magnetomechanical resonance occurs when the frequency of the driving field is one-half of fr, the mechanical resonance frequency of the ribbon. Th.e frequency fr is given by the relation fr - (112L)(E/D)0.5, where L is the ribbon length, E is the Young's modulus of the ribbon, and D is the density of the ribbon.
However, if a dc; magnetic field, referred to.as the biasing field, of suitable strength were imposed on the material concurrently with the ac field, the frequency of ribbon oscillations will be that of the driving ac field. The reason for this is that the material responds magnetostri<;tively to the net instantaneous magnetic field acting; upon it, and as long as this net field stays non-zero, the material will oscillate about the position where the constant do field has placed it. Apart from providing a sensitivity to the direction of the instantaneous ac field, the biasing field serves other purposes as well.
Magnetostrictive effects are observed in a ferromagnetic material only when the magnetization of the material proceeds through domain rotation. No magnetostriction is observed when motion of plane parallel domain. walls is the mechanism for magnetization. The biasing field places the material at, or beyond, the ";nee" of hysteresis loop of the material, in which magnetic state the motion of plane parallel walls has been expended, and further magnetization of the sample occurs mainly by domain rotation. The efficiency of magnetomechanical response from the material ha:; thus been improved. It is also well understood in the art that a biasing field serves .8.
to change the e~ffecti.ve value for E in a ferromagnetic material so that the mechanical resonance frequency of the material ma.y be modified by a suitable choice of strength for th.e biasing field.
Summarizir,.g the above, a ribbon of a positively magnetostrictive ferromagnetic material, when exposed to a driving ac magnetic: field in the presence of a do biasing field, will oscillate at the frequency of the driving ac field, and when this frequency coincides with the mechanical resonance frequency, fr, of the material, the ribbon will resonate and provide increased response signal amplitudes. l:n practice, the biasing field is provided by a ferromagnet with a higher coercivity than the target material present in the "target package".
The amplitude of the response signal, or voltage, from the target matec~ial increases through the duration of the exciting pulse (as dictated by inertia), and eventually reches a stable, constant value if the exciting pulse lasts for a long enough time. The peak-to-peak height of this stable amplitude is represented as Vr in the Figure. Once the exciting pulse is turned off, the target material "rings down", i.e., the amplitude of mechanical oscillations in the material and, consequently, the response voltage amplitude reduce to zero over a period of time. In other words, in the absence of an excitation, the~motion of the excited target material is damped. The profile of the amplitude of the target responae voltage is outlined in thick solid lines in the Figure.
The moment when the exciting pulse is turned off is defined as time t - O, and the monitoring of the sample response signal commences some time after t - 0, during the ring down period. The ring down time, tr, of the target material is defined, in the notation of the Figure, as the instant when the peak-to-peak target response voltage is 10~ of Vr. As used herein, the term "ring down time" means the time interval during which the amplitude of response from the ribbon is reduced to 1 341 0~ 1 about 10% of that amplitude extant when an exciting pulse applied to the ribbon is terminated, such time interval commencing at the instant of termination of the exciting pulse.
The ring down time, tr, is approximately a linear function of the ribbon length, L; the longer the ribbon, the longer is the ring down time. Without being bound by any theory, it is believed that the increase in tr with increasing L is associated with the lowering of the mechanical resonance frequency in longer ribbons. The same amount of energy takes longer to dissipate at lower frequencies.
The magnitude of the response voltage sensed by a receiver is dependent; on how that receiver is disposed within the system. F'or example, a receiver in a system requiring the inserti.an of an identification card into a slot will perceive a magnitude for Vr that is different from that perceived by a receiver in a system designed for employment at they exit doors of a department store, even though identical. target materials are used in both systems.
There are no requirements on the magnitude of Vr as far as the choice of target material is concerned. It is, however, understood that the value for Vr should be such that the response voltage is of sufficient strength to be detected by they receiver at the instant, during the ring down period, when the receiver "listens" to the target material. Henceforth, for the reasons detailed immediately above, no further reference to Vr will be made in the description of this invention.
Table I lists tree values for tr obtained from various metallic gla~~s alloys that are outside the scope of this invention but, which happen to lie within the scope of composition; claimed in the '489 and '190 Patents. With the e~s:ception of the last named alloy, the ring down times for the alloys in this Table are short. This last named alloy is prone to the difficulties associated with the casting of alloys with high molybdenum contents.
TABLE I
Ring down times, tr, obtained from ribbons of metallic glass alloy: that are outside the scope of this invention. Representative compositions from a variety of metallic glass sy~>tems have been listed. Except as noted, these ribbons have mechanical resonance frequencies, fr, in the range from about 55 kHz to 60 kHz.
Composition (at.~~) tr(ms) Fe78B13Si9 1.2 Fe81B~3.5S13.5C2 1.5 Fe66Co18B15S11 1.0 Fe~ONi~p820 5.2 Fe~2Ni38Mo2B18 1.8 Fe~ONi38Mo~B18 4.3 Ribbon with fr of about 22 kHz.
It has been found that the combination of the Specific elements in the alloys of this invention is necessary for the attainment of long ring down times.
Short ring down timed, result from metallic glass alloys that have any one of these elements absent from their composition. Table I:I lists the ring down times obtained from representative metallic glass alloys wherein both Si and C. are absent, and Table III contains a similar list derived from alloys with no C. The alloys in these Tables are outside the scope of this invention, and the undesirable ring down times obtained from these alloys are self evident from these Tables.
It is understood from the Tables II and III that the alloy Fe~0iJi38Mo4B18 is unique in terms of its long ring down time. A lowering of the molybdenum content to make the alloy more economical to produce invariably compromises the ring down time. It will be further understood frora the 'Tables I to III that the long ring down times obtained in the alloys of this invention, with the stated combination of the specific elements, TAUT L' TT
Aing down times, tr, obtained from ribbons of metallic glass alloy's containing Fe, Ni, Mo, and B, but no Si or C. E~ccept .as noted, these ribbons have mechanical resonance frequencies, fr, in the range from about 21 kHz to about 23 kHz.
Composition (at.'~) tr (ms) Fe~ONi38Mo3B19 6.0 Fe40N139Mo;3B18 6.0 Fe~1Ni38Mo3B18 1.8 (~) Ribbon with fr of about 58 kHz.
TART G' TTT
Ring down times, tr, obtained from ribbons of metallic glass alloys containing Fe, Ni, Mo, B, and Si, but no C. These ribbons have mechanical resonances in the range of frequencies from about 21 kHz to about 23 kHz.
Composition (at.~) tr (ms) Fe~ONi38Mo1+B17S11 2.6 Fe~ONi3gMo11B16S12 5.5 are much longer than the ring down times of previous target materia~.s.
The following examples are presented to provide a more complete understanding of the invention. The specific techn:lques, conditions and reported.data set forth to illustrate the principles and practice of the invention are exemplary and should not be construed as limiting the scope o:f the invention. All alloy compositions describ~sd in the examples are nominal compositions.
EXAMPLES
Example 1: Fe-Ni-Mo-B-Si-C metallic glasses 1. Sample Preparation Glassy met: al alloys in the Fe-Ni-Mo-B-Si-C family, designated as samples no. 1 to 13 in Table IU, were rapidly q»enched from the melt following the techniques taught by Narasimhan im U.S. Patent No. 4,142,571, All casts were made in a vacuum chamber, using 1 341 ~7 1 _13_ 25 to 100 g me7_ts. 'The resulting ribbons, typically 25 to 30 um thick and a bout 6 mm wide, were determined to be free of significant crystallinity by x-ray diffractometry using Cu-Ka radiation and differential scanning calori:metry. Each of the alloys was at least 70~ glassy and;, in many instances, the alloys were more than 90~ glassy. Ribbons of these glassy metal alloys were strong, shiny, hard, and ductile.
2~ Characterization of response as resonance targets Ribbon samples, cut to about 38 mm in length, were used for the characterization of ring down times in the various alloys" Th is ribbon length is appropriate to a mechanical resonance frequency ranging from about 55 kHz to about 60 kHz in these alloys. The biasing do field and the driving; ac field were obtained from two solenoids that were ~~oaxially configured. The biasing solenoid, about; 0.38 m in length, had a turn density of about 300 turns/m, and the driving solenoid was about 0.3 m long with a turn density of about 1440 turns/m.
The sample was placed on the axis of these solenoids, at about the midd7_e of their length. The sample response was sensed through a pick-up coil comprising between about 100 and "'~20 tu:rns of wire wound closely around the sample and covering the entire ribbon length. The sample responsE; (picl'~c-up signal) and the driving ac signal were sirnultan~eously monitored on an oscilloscope screen.
An initia_L estimation of the resonance frequencies of these as-cast ribbon samples was made by fixing the do biasing fie:Ld at about X40 A/m and scanning the frequency of a driving ac field of a constant amplitude of about 8 A/m, Peaks in the respective response signals identified t:he resonance frequencies, which were found to range from .about 55 to kHz to about 60 kHz.
Following the above procedure, for any given sample, a pulse was sent through the exciting solenoid, which pulse contained a counted number of waves at the resonance frequency determined earlier as appropriate for the sample. The number of waves, or, equivalently, the duration of the pulse, was adjusted to be sufficient to ensure that the sample response had reached a stable value. Adjustments t:o the driving frequency, and to the biasing field ~~trengt;h, were also made, when necessary, to obtain a ma~s:imum sample response signal. Peak sample responses were obtained with the biasing field ranging from about X400 A/m to about 600 A/m, the driving frequency ranging from about 56 kHz to about 58 kHz, and the exciting pulse comprising between about 80 and 100 waves.
The trace~~ on the oscilloscope screen were as schematically illustc~ated in the Figure. As described above, the ring down time was determined as the time required for the sample response amplitude to reduce to 10~ of the amplitude at the instant the exciting pulse was turned off. Tab7Le IV below lists the ring down times obtained.from these 38 mm long as-cast metallic glass ribbons.
Ring down times, tr, obtained from various Fe-Ni-Mo-B-Si-C meta~.lic glasses belonging to this invention. Me<;hanical resonance frequencies range from about 55 kHz to about 60 kHz.
Composition No. Fe -- Ni - Mo - B - Si - C tr (ms) 1 at 40 - - 38 2 - 1 9 - 0 - 0 5 . - . . 5 .
% 5 3 wt.% 45.8 - 45.7 3.9 4.2 - 0.3 - 0.1 - - -2 at.% 40 . _ 3g _ 2 18.5 - 1 - 0.5 7.5 ~ - .
wt.% 45.7 - 45.6 3.9 4.1 - 0.6 - 0.1 - - -153 at.% 40 . _ 3g 3 - 18' - 0.5 - 0.5 4.7 ~ _ wt.% 45.0 - 44.9 5.8 3.9 - 0.3 - 0.1 - - -4 at.% 40 . . 38' - 1.5 18.5 - 1~ - 1. 6.3 -wt.% 46.1 - 46.0 3.0 4.1 - 0.6 - 0.2 - - -5 at 40 . - 38 - 1 18 - 1 - 1 5.
. - . . . 0 % 5 5 -wt.% 46.0 - 45.9 - 3.0 4.0 - 0.9 - 0.2 - ~ - .
. ~
6 at.% . _ 3g _ 2 18.5 - 0.5 - 1 6.3 wt.% 45.8 - 45.7 3.9 4.1 - 0.3 - 0.2 - - -7 at.% 40 - - 38. - 2 18. - 1 - 1. 5.0 -wt.% 45.7 - 45.6 3.9 4.0 - 0.6 - 0.2 - - -258 at.% 40. _ 3g _ 2 17.5 - 1.5 - 1. 5.0 . -wt.% 45.6 - 45.5 - 3.9 3.9 - 0.9 - 0.2 - -9 at.% 40~ - 38. - 2.5 17.5 - 1 - 1~ 5.7 . -wt.% 45.3 - 45.2 - 4.9 3.8 - 0.6 - 0.2 -1o at.% 40 . - 38. - 3 17 ~ - 1 - 1 6.5 . . . ' -wt.% 44.9 - 44.8 - 5.8 3.7 - 0.6 - 0.2 -~
11 at.% 40. - 38~ - 1 18~ - 1.5 - 1.5 5.1 . -wt.% 46.4 - 46.3 2.0 4.0 - 0.9 - 0.4 . - -12 at.% 40' - 38 - 1.5 - 18. - 1. - 1.5 4.2 ~
wt.% 46.1 - 46.0 - 3.0 4.0 - 0.6 - 0.4 . -3513 at.% 40' - 38 - 2. 17. - 1.5 - 1.5 5.5 -wt.% 45.6 - 45.5 - 3.9 3.8 - 0.9 - 0.4 . -Each of the alloys listed in Table IU showed good castability and had a ring down time of at least about ~.2 ms, which is relatively long as compared with alloys outside the scope of the invention. Of the alloys set forth in Table IV, those selected from the group consisting of sample Nos. 2, ~, 6, 7 and 10, having a ring down time of at least about 5 ms, are preferred.
Annealing of metallic glasses improves their soft ferromagnetic characteristics. Consequently, the ring down times of the metallic glasses of this invention are improved if these glassy alloys are annealed.
Ribbons of selected alloys from the above Table were subject to simple stress relief anneals, i.e., low temperature anneals in the absence of externally imposed magnetic fields. Th~s anneal temperature ranged between about x+73 K an<i 573 K, and the anneal time ranged between about '15 min. and 60 min. Ring down times from these annealed ribbons were found to be longer than in the correspond:lng as-cast ribbons. The extent of increase was dependent on the chemical composition of the metallic g7_ass and on the anneal conditions for a given alloy. Other anneal conditions which may optimize the magnetomechanical coupling effects available in a metallic glass alloy ribbon, such as those including the Presence of exi;ernal fields applied along the ribbon width, can be E~mploy~ed to improve the resonance target response of the alloys of this invention.
Example ~'_: Fe-Ni-Cr-B-Si-C metallic glasses Glassy met; al alloys in the Fe-Ni-Cr-B-Si-C system were prepared and ch;~racterized as detailed under Example 1. The ring down times obtained from representative alloys in this family of metallic glasses are listed in Table U.
TABLE V
Ring down times., tr, obtained from various Fe-Ni-Cr-B-Si-C metallic glasses belonging to this invention. Mechanical resonance frequencies range from about 55 kHz to about: 60 kHz.
Composition No. Fe - Ni - Cr - B - Si - C tr(ms) l0 1 at.% 40 - ~ 38 - - 18 - 1 - 0 3.8 wt.% 46.1 ~ 46.1 3.2 - 4.0 - 0.6 - 0 - -2 at.% 40. - 38. - - 18. - 2~ - 0 4.1 2.
wt.% 46.4 - 46.3 2.2 - 4.0 - 1.2 - 0 - -3 at.% 40, - 38. - - 18. - 2~ - 2 4.1 0.
15 wt.% 47.1 ~ 47.1 - - 4.1 - 1.2 - 0.5 Example 3 20 Numerous casts were made of the alloy Fe40Ni38Mo2-B18Si1C1, which belongs to this invention, and of the alloy Fe40Ni38hIo4B18, which is outside the scope of this invention, following the procedures detailed under Example 1. Uniformity in width, and a lack of holes and 25 kinks were used as the criteria for selection of "good"
38 mm long ribbons, usable as target material. About 10 to 15 such ribbons could be derived from a typical cast of the alloy belonging to this invention, whereas the alloy outside t:he scope of this invention yielded only 4 30 to 8 such ribbc>ns from a typical cast.
The above stated criteria are good indicators of the potential yield ~°rom a large scale cast of metallic glass ribbon. Kinks develop in the ribbons cast in a vacuum chamber when the ribbon, that is still hot, 35 contacts the walls of the vacuum chamber. Under otherwise simi7.ar casting conditions, an,alloy that is more efficient7.y quenched into ribbon will show fewer kinks along the length of the ribbon. Similarly, it is ~34~~~9 =,a=
understood that a lack of uniformity in width, and the presence of ho:Les in the cast ribbon, evidence reduced castability of the alloy.
Having thus described the invention in rather full detail, it will be understood that such detail need not be strictly adhered to but that further changes and modifications may suggest themselves to one skilled in the art, all falling within the scope of the invention as defined by the subjoined claims.
11 at.% 40. - 38~ - 1 18~ - 1.5 - 1.5 5.1 . -wt.% 46.4 - 46.3 2.0 4.0 - 0.9 - 0.4 . - -12 at.% 40' - 38 - 1.5 - 18. - 1. - 1.5 4.2 ~
wt.% 46.1 - 46.0 - 3.0 4.0 - 0.6 - 0.4 . -3513 at.% 40' - 38 - 2. 17. - 1.5 - 1.5 5.5 -wt.% 45.6 - 45.5 - 3.9 3.8 - 0.9 - 0.4 . -Each of the alloys listed in Table IU showed good castability and had a ring down time of at least about ~.2 ms, which is relatively long as compared with alloys outside the scope of the invention. Of the alloys set forth in Table IV, those selected from the group consisting of sample Nos. 2, ~, 6, 7 and 10, having a ring down time of at least about 5 ms, are preferred.
Annealing of metallic glasses improves their soft ferromagnetic characteristics. Consequently, the ring down times of the metallic glasses of this invention are improved if these glassy alloys are annealed.
Ribbons of selected alloys from the above Table were subject to simple stress relief anneals, i.e., low temperature anneals in the absence of externally imposed magnetic fields. Th~s anneal temperature ranged between about x+73 K an<i 573 K, and the anneal time ranged between about '15 min. and 60 min. Ring down times from these annealed ribbons were found to be longer than in the correspond:lng as-cast ribbons. The extent of increase was dependent on the chemical composition of the metallic g7_ass and on the anneal conditions for a given alloy. Other anneal conditions which may optimize the magnetomechanical coupling effects available in a metallic glass alloy ribbon, such as those including the Presence of exi;ernal fields applied along the ribbon width, can be E~mploy~ed to improve the resonance target response of the alloys of this invention.
Example ~'_: Fe-Ni-Cr-B-Si-C metallic glasses Glassy met; al alloys in the Fe-Ni-Cr-B-Si-C system were prepared and ch;~racterized as detailed under Example 1. The ring down times obtained from representative alloys in this family of metallic glasses are listed in Table U.
TABLE V
Ring down times., tr, obtained from various Fe-Ni-Cr-B-Si-C metallic glasses belonging to this invention. Mechanical resonance frequencies range from about 55 kHz to about: 60 kHz.
Composition No. Fe - Ni - Cr - B - Si - C tr(ms) l0 1 at.% 40 - ~ 38 - - 18 - 1 - 0 3.8 wt.% 46.1 ~ 46.1 3.2 - 4.0 - 0.6 - 0 - -2 at.% 40. - 38. - - 18. - 2~ - 0 4.1 2.
wt.% 46.4 - 46.3 2.2 - 4.0 - 1.2 - 0 - -3 at.% 40, - 38. - - 18. - 2~ - 2 4.1 0.
15 wt.% 47.1 ~ 47.1 - - 4.1 - 1.2 - 0.5 Example 3 20 Numerous casts were made of the alloy Fe40Ni38Mo2-B18Si1C1, which belongs to this invention, and of the alloy Fe40Ni38hIo4B18, which is outside the scope of this invention, following the procedures detailed under Example 1. Uniformity in width, and a lack of holes and 25 kinks were used as the criteria for selection of "good"
38 mm long ribbons, usable as target material. About 10 to 15 such ribbons could be derived from a typical cast of the alloy belonging to this invention, whereas the alloy outside t:he scope of this invention yielded only 4 30 to 8 such ribbc>ns from a typical cast.
The above stated criteria are good indicators of the potential yield ~°rom a large scale cast of metallic glass ribbon. Kinks develop in the ribbons cast in a vacuum chamber when the ribbon, that is still hot, 35 contacts the walls of the vacuum chamber. Under otherwise simi7.ar casting conditions, an,alloy that is more efficient7.y quenched into ribbon will show fewer kinks along the length of the ribbon. Similarly, it is ~34~~~9 =,a=
understood that a lack of uniformity in width, and the presence of ho:Les in the cast ribbon, evidence reduced castability of the alloy.
Having thus described the invention in rather full detail, it will be understood that such detail need not be strictly adhered to but that further changes and modifications may suggest themselves to one skilled in the art, all falling within the scope of the invention as defined by the subjoined claims.
Claims (15)
1. A magnetic metallic glass alloy that is at least about 70% glassy.
having a composition described by the formula F e a N i b M c B d Si e C f, where M is one of molybdenum and chromium, "a" - "f" are in atom percent, "a" ranges from about 39 to about 41 , "b" ranges from about 37 to about 39, "c" ranges from 0 to about 3, "d" ranges from about 17 to about 19, and "e" and "f" range from 0 to about 2, with the provisos that (i) only one of "c", "e" and "f" can be zero, (ii) "e" cannot be zero if "f" is not zero, and (iii) "F" can be zero only when M is Cr, said alloy having the form of a strip that exhibits mechanical resonance in a range of frequencies from about 55 kHz to about 60 kHz, and having a ring down time of at least about 3 ms..
having a composition described by the formula F e a N i b M c B d Si e C f, where M is one of molybdenum and chromium, "a" - "f" are in atom percent, "a" ranges from about 39 to about 41 , "b" ranges from about 37 to about 39, "c" ranges from 0 to about 3, "d" ranges from about 17 to about 19, and "e" and "f" range from 0 to about 2, with the provisos that (i) only one of "c", "e" and "f" can be zero, (ii) "e" cannot be zero if "f" is not zero, and (iii) "F" can be zero only when M is Cr, said alloy having the form of a strip that exhibits mechanical resonance in a range of frequencies from about 55 kHz to about 60 kHz, and having a ring down time of at least about 3 ms..
2. The magnetic alloy of claim 1, wherein said ring down time is greater than about 5 ms.
3. The magnetic alloy of claim 1, wherein M is the element molybdenum.
4. The magnetic alloy of claim 2, wherein M is the element molybdenum.
5. The magnetic alloy of claim 1, wherein "e" or "f" ranges between about 0.5 and about 2.
6. The magnetic alloy of claim 2, wherein each of "e" and "f"
ranges between about 0.5 and about 1.
ranges between about 0.5 and about 1.
7. The magnetic alloy of claim 6, having a composition selected from the group consisting of Fe40Ni38MO2B18Si1C1 Fe40Ni38Mo1.5B18.5Si1C1, Fe40Ni38Mo2B18.5Si1C0.5, Fe40Ni38Mo2B18.5Si0.5C1 and Fe40Ni38Mo3B17Si1C1
8. In an article surveillance system adapted to detect a signal produced by mechanical resonance of a target within an applied magnetic field, the improvement wherein said target comprises at least one strip of ferromagnetic material that is at least about 70% glassy, and has a composition described by the formula Fe a Ni b M c B d Si e C F, where M is one of molybdenum and chromium, "a" - "f" are in atom percent, "a" ranges from about 39 to about 41, "b" ranges from about 37 to about 39, "c" ranges from 0 to about 3, "d" ranges from about 17 to about 19, and "e" and "t" range from 0 to about 2 with the provisos that (i) only one of "c", "e", and "t" can be zero.
(ii) "e" cannot be zero if "t" is not zero, and (iii) "f" can be zero only when M
is Cr, said strip exhibiting mechanical resonance in a range of frequencies from about 55 kHz to about 60 kHz, and having a ring down time of at least about 3 ms.
(ii) "e" cannot be zero if "t" is not zero, and (iii) "f" can be zero only when M
is Cr, said strip exhibiting mechanical resonance in a range of frequencies from about 55 kHz to about 60 kHz, and having a ring down time of at least about 3 ms.
9. An article suirveillance system as recited by claim 8, wherein said strip is selected from the group consisting of ribbon, wire and sheet.
10. An article surveillance system, as recited by claim 9, wherein said strip is a ribbon.
11. An article surveillance system as recited by claim 8, wherein said ring down time is greater than about 5 ms.
12. An article surveillance system as recited by claim 8, wherein M
is the element molybdenum.
is the element molybdenum.
13. An article surveillance system as recited by claim 8, wherein "e"
or "f" ranges between about 0.5 and about 2.
or "f" ranges between about 0.5 and about 2.
14. An article surveillance system as recited by claim 12 wherein "e" and "F' range hetween about 0.5 and about 1.
15. An article surveillance system as recited by claim 14, wherein said strip has a composition selected from the group consisting of Fe40Ni38Mo2B18Si1C1, Fe40Ni38Mo1.5B18.5Si1C1, Fe40Ni38Mo2B18.5Si1C0.5 Fe40Ni38Mo2B18.5Si0.5 and Fe40Ni38Mo3B17Si1C1
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US24869988A | 1988-09-26 | 1988-09-26 | |
US248,699 | 1988-09-26 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CA1341071C true CA1341071C (en) | 2000-08-01 |
Family
ID=22940286
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA000610868A Expired - Fee Related CA1341071C (en) | 1988-09-26 | 1989-09-11 | Metallic glass alloys for mechanically resonant target surveillance systems |
Country Status (6)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP0435885B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JPH04500985A (en) |
CA (1) | CA1341071C (en) |
DE (1) | DE68908184T2 (en) |
DK (1) | DK48791D0 (en) |
WO (1) | WO1990003652A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (22)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
TW226034B (en) * | 1991-03-06 | 1994-07-01 | Allied Signal Inc | |
DE9412456U1 (en) | 1994-08-02 | 1994-10-27 | Vacuumschmelze Gmbh, 63450 Hanau | Amorphous alloy with high magnetostriction and at the same time high induced anisotropy |
US5949334A (en) * | 1995-10-02 | 1999-09-07 | Sensormatic Electronics Corporation | Magnetostrictive element having optimized bias-field-dependent resonant frequency characteristic |
DE19545755A1 (en) * | 1995-12-07 | 1997-06-12 | Vacuumschmelze Gmbh | Use of an amorphous alloy for magnetoelastic excitable labels in monitoring systems based on mechanical resonance |
DE19651525A1 (en) | 1996-12-11 | 1998-06-18 | Vacuumschmelze Gmbh | Labels in acustomagnetic anti-theft systems |
US6157301A (en) * | 1996-12-13 | 2000-12-05 | Vacuumschmelze Gmbh | Marker for use in a magnetic electronic article surveillance system |
DE19653430A1 (en) * | 1996-12-20 | 1999-04-01 | Vacuumschmelze Gmbh | Display element for use in a magnetic goods surveillance system |
US6057766A (en) * | 1997-02-14 | 2000-05-02 | Sensormatic Electronics Corporation | Iron-rich magnetostrictive element having optimized bias-field-dependent resonant frequency characteristic |
TW374183B (en) * | 1997-06-24 | 1999-11-11 | Toshiba Corp | Amorphous magnetic material and magnetic core using the same |
US6803118B2 (en) | 1997-07-30 | 2004-10-12 | Vacuumschmelze Gmbh | Marker for use in a magnetic anti-theft security system |
DE19732872C2 (en) * | 1997-07-30 | 2002-04-18 | Vacuumschmelze Gmbh | Display element for use in a magnetic anti-theft system |
DE19740908C1 (en) * | 1997-09-17 | 1999-08-05 | Vacuumschmelze Gmbh | Indicator for use in a magnetic anti-theft system and method of making an activation strip therefor |
US6011475A (en) | 1997-11-12 | 2000-01-04 | Vacuumschmelze Gmbh | Method of annealing amorphous ribbons and marker for electronic article surveillance |
US6254695B1 (en) * | 1998-08-13 | 2001-07-03 | Vacuumschmelze Gmbh | Method employing tension control and lower-cost alloy composition annealing amorphous alloys with shorter annealing time |
DE29823167U1 (en) * | 1998-12-29 | 1999-04-08 | Georg Siegel GmbH zur Verwertung von gewerblichen Schutzrechten, 59174 Kamen | Anti-theft device |
US6359563B1 (en) * | 1999-02-10 | 2002-03-19 | Vacuumschmelze Gmbh | ‘Magneto-acoustic marker for electronic article surveillance having reduced size and high signal amplitude’ |
US6645314B1 (en) | 2000-10-02 | 2003-11-11 | Vacuumschmelze Gmbh | Amorphous alloys for magneto-acoustic markers in electronic article surveillance having reduced, low or zero co-content and method of annealing the same |
JP4244123B2 (en) | 2002-08-20 | 2009-03-25 | 日立金属株式会社 | Resonator |
CA2590826C (en) * | 2006-06-06 | 2014-09-30 | Owen Oil Tools Lp | Retention member for perforating guns |
DE102006047022B4 (en) | 2006-10-02 | 2009-04-02 | Vacuumschmelze Gmbh & Co. Kg | Display element for a magnetic anti-theft system and method for its production |
US7432815B2 (en) | 2006-10-05 | 2008-10-07 | Vacuumschmelze Gmbh & Co. Kg | Marker for a magnetic theft protection system and method for its production |
JP6337994B1 (en) * | 2017-06-26 | 2018-06-06 | Tdk株式会社 | Soft magnetic alloys and magnetic parts |
Family Cites Families (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPS5933183B2 (en) * | 1980-06-24 | 1984-08-14 | 株式会社東芝 | Low loss amorphous alloy |
US4510490A (en) * | 1982-04-29 | 1985-04-09 | Allied Corporation | Coded surveillance system having magnetomechanical marker |
US4510489A (en) * | 1982-04-29 | 1985-04-09 | Allied Corporation | Surveillance system having magnetomechanical marker |
JPS58213857A (en) * | 1982-06-04 | 1983-12-12 | Takeshi Masumoto | Amorphous iron alloy having superior fatigue characteristic |
-
1989
- 1989-08-16 EP EP89909913A patent/EP0435885B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1989-08-16 WO PCT/US1989/003513 patent/WO1990003652A1/en active IP Right Grant
- 1989-08-16 JP JP1509158A patent/JPH04500985A/en active Pending
- 1989-08-16 DE DE89909913T patent/DE68908184T2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1989-09-11 CA CA000610868A patent/CA1341071C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
1991
- 1991-03-19 DK DK91487A patent/DK48791D0/en not_active Application Discontinuation
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP0435885B1 (en) | 1993-08-04 |
DE68908184T2 (en) | 1993-11-25 |
EP0435885A1 (en) | 1991-07-10 |
DE68908184D1 (en) | 1993-09-09 |
JPH04500985A (en) | 1992-02-20 |
WO1990003652A1 (en) | 1990-04-05 |
DK48791A (en) | 1991-03-19 |
DK48791D0 (en) | 1991-03-19 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CA1341071C (en) | Metallic glass alloys for mechanically resonant target surveillance systems | |
US5650023A (en) | Metallic glass alloys for mechanically resonant marker surveillance systems | |
US4510490A (en) | Coded surveillance system having magnetomechanical marker | |
US6093261A (en) | Metallic glass alloys for mechanically resonant marker surveillance systems | |
US6018296A (en) | Amorphous magnetostrictive alloy with low cobalt content and method for annealing same | |
US20040074566A1 (en) | Amorphous alloys for magneto-acoustic markers in electronic article surveillance having reduced, low or zero co-content and method of annealing the same | |
US5539380A (en) | Metallic glass alloys for mechanically resonant marker surveillance systems | |
US6187112B1 (en) | Metallic glass alloys for mechanically resonant marker surveillance systems | |
US5495231A (en) | Metallic glass alloys for mechanically resonant marker surveillance systems | |
US5891270A (en) | Heat-treatment of glassy metal alloy for article surveillance system markers | |
CA2217722C (en) | Metallic glass alloys for mechanically resonant marker surveillance systems | |
KR100478114B1 (en) | Metallic glass alloys for mechanically resonant marker surveillance systems | |
MXPA97007747A (en) | Metal glass alloys for marker supervision systems mechanically resona | |
AU2013273786A1 (en) | Amorphous alloy compositions for a magnetomechanical resonator and EAS marker containing same |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
MKLA | Lapsed |