editing
approved
editing
approved
T(n, n-k) = (-1)^k*Sum_{m = 0..n-1..2*} Stirling1(km+1, n-k)} *binomial(2*(k+1), m)*T(n-m, n-(m+k))*(-1)^(, m-1), for n > 3*k+2.
approved
editing
proposed
approved
editing
proposed
T := (n, k) -> local m; add(Stirling1(m+1, k)*binomial(n, m)*(-1)^(n + k), m = 0..n-1): seq(seq(T(n, k), k = 1..n), n = 1..9); # Peter Luschny, Nov 10 2023
T(n, k) = Sum_{m = 0..n-1} StirlingStirling1(m+1, k)*binomial(n, m)*(-1)^(n + k), where "StirlingStirling1" are the signed Stirling numbers of the first kind.
If we want to To use the unsigned Stirling numbers we can rewrite the formula intoas: T(n, k) = Sum_{m = 0..n-1} Stirlingabs(Stirling1(m+1, k, 2))*binomial(n, m)*(-1)^(1+m+n). Replacing in this formula Stirling1 (A008275) by Stirling2 (A048993) one obtains a shifted version of A321331.
If we would replace the Stirling numbers of the first kind (A008275) here by the second kind (A048993), we will obtain A321331 instead.
proposed
editing
editing
proposed
1, 1, 2, 4, 6, 3, 15, 30, 18, 4, 76, 165, 125, 40, 5, 455, 1075, 930, 380, 75, 6, 3186, 8015, 7679, 3675, 945, 126, 7, 25487, 67536, 70042, 37688, 11550, 2044, 196, 8, 229384, 634935, 702372, 414078, 144417, 30870, 3990, 288, 9, 2293839, 6591943, 7696245, 4886390, 1885065, 463092, 73080, 7200, 405, 10
If we want to use unsigned Stirling numbers we can rewrite the formula into: T(n, k) = Sum_{m = 0..n-1} Stirling(m+1, k, 2)*binomial(n, m)*(-1)^(1+m+n). If we would replace the Stirling numbers of the first kind (A008275) here by the second kind (A048993), we will obtain A321331 instead.
If we would replace the Stirling numbers of the first kind (A008275) here by the second kind (A048993), we will obtain A321331 instead.
1, .;
1, 2 .;
4, 6, 3, .;
15, 30, 18, 4, .;
76, 165, 125, 40, 5 .;
455, 1075, 930, 380, 75, 6 .;
nonn,tabf,tabl,changed
proposed
editing