[go: up one dir, main page]

login
Revision History for A329564 (Bold, blue-underlined text is an addition; faded, red-underlined text is a deletion.)

Showing all changes.
For all n >= 0, exactly five sums are prime among a(n+i) + a(n+j), 0 <= i < j < 5; lexicographically earliest such sequence of distinct nonnegative numbers.
(history; published version)
#8 by Michael De Vlieger at Fri Jan 07 19:35:45 EST 2022
STATUS

proposed

approved

#7 by Jon E. Schoenfield at Fri Jan 07 18:18:18 EST 2022
STATUS

editing

proposed

#6 by Jon E. Schoenfield at Fri Jan 07 18:18:15 EST 2022
EXAMPLE

Therefore 4 isn't the next term, and we try a(5) = 5 which indeed gives the required number of primes, and also allows us to continue.

STATUS

approved

editing

#5 by M. F. Hasler at Wed Feb 12 20:06:42 EST 2020
STATUS

editing

approved

#4 by M. F. Hasler at Wed Feb 12 20:05:29 EST 2020
COMMENTS

If so, then the restriction to [1..oo) is a permutation of the positive integers, but not the smallest such, which is given in A329563. It seems that the two sequences have no common terms beyond a(6) = 8, except for the accidental a(22) = 15 and maybe some later coincidences of this type. There also appears to be no other simple relation between the terms of these sequences, in contrast to, e.g., A055265 vs. A128280. - _M. F. Hasler_, Feb 12 2020

CROSSREFS

Cf. A329425 (6 primes using 5 consecutive terms), A329566 (6 primes using 6 consecutive terms).

Cf. A329449 A055266 & A253074 (0 primes using 2 terms), A329405 & A329450 (0 primes using 3 terms), A055265 & A128280 (1 prime using 2 terms), A329333, A329406 - A329410 (1 prime using 3, ..., 10 terms), A329411 - A329416 and A329452, A329453 (2 primes using 3, ..., 10 terms), A329454 & A329455 (4 3 primes using 4 consecutive resp. 5 terms), A329449 & A329456 (4 primes using 4 resp. 5 consecutive terms), A329568 & A329569 (9 primes using 6 terms), A329572 & A329573 (12 primes using 7 terms), A329563 - A329581: other variants.

Cf. A329454 (3 primes using 4 consecutive terms), A329455 (3 primes using 5 consecutive terms).

Cf. A329411 (2 primes using 3 consecutive terms), A329452 (2 primes using 4 consecutive terms), A329453 (2 primes using 5 consecutive terms).

Cf. A329333 (1 (odd) prime using 3 terms), A128280 & A055265 (1 prime using 2 terms); A055266 & A253074 (0 primes using 2 terms), A329405 & A329450 (0 primes using 3 terms), A329406 ff: other variants.

STATUS

approved

editing

#3 by M. F. Hasler at Sun Feb 09 22:48:11 EST 2020
STATUS

editing

approved

#2 by M. F. Hasler at Sun Feb 09 22:27:18 EST 2020
NAME

allocated for M. F. Hasler

For all n >= 0, exactly five sums are prime among a(n+i) + a(n+j), 0 <= i < j < 5; lexicographically earliest such sequence of distinct nonnegative numbers.

DATA

0, 1, 2, 3, 6, 5, 8, 11, 7, 12, 29, 18, 19, 4, 13, 9, 22, 10, 21, 14, 57, 16, 15, 17, 26, 27, 20, 23, 33, 34, 38, 45, 25, 28, 51, 46, 31, 43, 58, 30, 24, 37, 49, 35, 36, 102, 47, 42, 55, 32, 41, 48, 65, 39, 62, 44, 40, 63, 69, 50, 68, 59, 80, 71, 54, 77, 60, 53, 56, 74, 75

OFFSET

0,3

COMMENTS

That is, there are 5 primes, counted with multiplicity, among the 10 pairwise sums of any 5 consecutive terms.

Conjectured to be a permutation of the nonnegative integers.

If so, then the restriction to [1..oo) is a permutation of the positive integers, but not the smallest such, which is given in A329563.

LINKS

M. F. Hasler, <a href="/wiki/User:M._F._Hasler/Prime_sums_from_neighboring_terms">Prime sums from neighboring terms</a>, OEIS wiki, Nov. 23, 2019

EXAMPLE

For n = 0, we consider pairwise sums among the first 5 terms a(0..4), among which we must have 5 primes. To get a(4), consider first a(0..3) = (0, 1, 2, 3) and the pairwise sums (a(i) + a(j), 0 <= i < j <= 3) = (1; 2, 3; 3, 4, 5) among which there are 4 primes, counted with multiplicity (i.e., the prime 3 is there two times). So the additional term a(4) must give exactly one more prime sum with all of a(0..3). We find that 4 or 5 would give two more primes, but a(4) = 6 gives exactly one more, 1 + 6 = 7.

Now, for n = 1 we forget the initial 0 and consider the pairwise sums of the remaining terms {1, 2, 3, 6}. There are 3 prime sums, so the next term must give two more. The term 4 would give two more (1+4 and 3+4) primes, but thereafter we would have {2, 3, 6, 4} with only 2 prime sums and impossibility to add one term to get three more prime sums: 2+x, 6+x and 4+x can't be all prime for x > 1.

Therefore 4 isn't the next term, and we try a(5) = 5 which indeed gives the required number of primes, and also allows to continue.

PROG

(PARI) {A329564(n, show=1, o=0, N=5, M=4, X=[[4, 4]], p=[], u, U)=for(n=o, n-1, show>0&& print1(o", "); show<0&& listput(L, o); U+=1<<(o-u); U>>=-u+u+=valuation(U+1, 2); p=concat(if(#p>=M, p[^1], p), o); my(c=N-sum(i=2, #p, sum(j=1, i-1, isprime(p[i]+p[j])))); if(#p<M&&sum(i=1, #p, isprime(p[i]+u))<=c, o=u)|| for(k=u, oo, bittest(U, k-u)|| sum(i=1, #p, isprime(p[i]+k))!=c|| setsearch(X, [n, k])|| [o=k, break])); show&&print([u]); o} \\ optional args: show=1: print a(o..n-1), show=-1: append them on global list L, in both cases print [least unused number] at the end. See the wiki page for a function S() which returns a vector: a(0..n-1) = S(5, 5; 0).

CROSSREFS

Cf. A329425 (6 primes using 5 consecutive terms), A329566 (6 primes using 6 consecutive terms).

Cf. A329449 (4 primes using 4 consecutive terms), A329456 (4 primes using 5 consecutive terms).

Cf. A329454 (3 primes using 4 consecutive terms), A329455 (3 primes using 5 consecutive terms).

Cf. A329411 (2 primes using 3 consecutive terms), A329452 (2 primes using 4 consecutive terms), A329453 (2 primes using 5 consecutive terms).

Cf. A329333 (1 (odd) prime using 3 terms), A128280 & A055265 (1 prime using 2 terms); A055266 & A253074 (0 primes using 2 terms), A329405 & A329450 (0 primes using 3 terms), A329406 ff: other variants.

KEYWORD

allocated

nonn,changed

AUTHOR

M. F. Hasler, Feb 09 2020

STATUS

approved

editing

#1 by M. F. Hasler at Sat Nov 16 23:58:01 EST 2019
NAME

allocated for M. F. Hasler

KEYWORD

allocated

STATUS

approved