[go: up one dir, main page]

login
Revision History for A032253 (Bold, blue-underlined text is an addition; faded, red-underlined text is a deletion.)

Showing entries 1-10 | older changes
"DHK" (bracelet, identity, unlabeled) transform of 3,3,3,3,...
(history; published version)
#87 by Andrey Zabolotskiy at Thu Apr 25 09:15:06 EDT 2024
STATUS

editing

approved

#86 by Andrey Zabolotskiy at Thu Apr 25 09:15:03 EDT 2024
FORMULA

G.f.: 1 - x/2 - (1/2)*Sum_{d >= 1} (mu(d)/d)*log(1 - 4*x^d) - (1/2)*Sum_{d >= 1} mu(d)*3*x^d/((1 - 2*x^d)*(1 - x^d)) + 3*x*(1 + x + x^2)/((1 + x)*(1 - x)^2). (End)

STATUS

approved

editing

#85 by Susanna Cuyler at Tue Sep 17 08:27:05 EDT 2019
STATUS

proposed

approved

#84 by Jean-François Alcover at Tue Sep 17 03:58:54 EDT 2019
STATUS

editing

proposed

#83 by Jean-François Alcover at Tue Sep 17 03:58:47 EDT 2019
MATHEMATICA

A001651[n_] := n - 1 + Ceiling[n/2];

A185172[n_] := If[n==1, 3, Sum[MoebiusMu[d] 4^(n/d), {d, Divisors[n]}]/n];

A038199[n_] := Sum[((2^d-1) MoebiusMu[n/d]), {d, Divisors[n]}];

a[n_] := Switch[n, 0, 1, 1, 3, _, 3 A001651[n] + (1/2)(A185172[n] - 3 * A038199[n])];

a /@ Range[0, 30] (* Jean-François Alcover, Sep 17 2019 *)

STATUS

approved

editing

#82 by Peter Luschny at Mon Jul 22 14:38:47 EDT 2019
STATUS

reviewed

approved

#81 by Joerg Arndt at Mon Jul 22 11:47:07 EDT 2019
STATUS

proposed

reviewed

#80 by Petros Hadjicostas at Mon Jun 24 14:47:40 EDT 2019
STATUS

editing

proposed

Discussion
Tue Jun 25
01:03
Michel Marcus: 71 edits !!
01:08
Petros Hadjicostas: It took me several hours to finish it! I had many corrections, references, formulas, explanations, examples, etc.
Thu Jun 27
03:08
Peter Luschny: Warning: We will now install a review system that automatically deletes *all* edits within a submission after the 50-th edit from the same author. OEIS is not a scratch-pad.
10:09
Petros Hadjicostas: Dear Peter, thanks for the comment. Because of this, I decided to limit my contributions to the OEIS.
12:56
Peter Luschny: No, please don't. It was kind of a joke. Still: why fill the files of OEIS with hundreds of drafts? You can also make them in your own notebook and when finished enter the result here.
#79 by Petros Hadjicostas at Mon Jun 24 14:47:25 EDT 2019
COMMENTS

Many mathematicians consider a cyclic composition of n >= 1 with one part or with two parts as achiral by default because the axis of symmetry may pass through the parts. When he defines the DHK transform, Bowers (in the link below) does not accept this convention except possibly for a cyclic composition with two identical (in value and color) parts.

STATUS

proposed

editing

#78 by Petros Hadjicostas at Tue Jun 18 22:05:47 EDT 2019
STATUS

editing

proposed