Abstract
Purpose of Review
The main obstacle to an HIV-1 cure is the reservoir of HIV-1 infected cells. While antiretroviral therapy (ART) eliminates the HIV-1 virus effectively, it does not target the reservoir. To eliminate infected cells, we need an improved understanding of the reservoir maintenance and reactivation mechanisms, including the influence of chromatin.
Recent Findings
The last years’ technological advances enable an in-depth study of the reservoir, uncovering subsets of infected cells, proviral integration sites, and single-cell nucleosome histone modifications. These revelations illustrate how the immune system and cell proliferation shape reservoirs under long-term ART. These forces create highly individual reservoirs that will require personalized treatment for their eradication.
Summary
A greater understanding of HIV-1 latency mechanisms, focusing on chromatin features, proviral reservoir dynamics, and inter-individual differences, can drive the development of more precise HIV-1 treatment strategies, ultimately achieving a globally available HIV-1 cure.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
An HIV-1 cure is prevented by the reservoir of infected cells. Whereas antiretroviral therapy is highly effective at eliminating the HIV-1 virus, it does not target the reservoir. Most people currently living with HIV-1 are under antiretroviral therapy and virally suppressed [1]. In these individuals, free infectious virus is virtually eliminated, but the reservoir persists. In the latent reservoir of HIV-1 infected cells, the provirus is silent, which makes these cells challenging to detect, both for the immune system and for therapeutic interventions. It is recognized that chromatin structure and composition play a crucial role in the formation and maintenance of proviral latency, as well as the reactivation capability of latently infected cells [2,3,4,5].
An understanding of the molecular mechanisms regulating HIV-1 latency from a chromatin and epigenetic perspective has the potential of opening avenues for novel therapeutic strategies targeting the reservoir of HIV-1 infected cells. Key aspects include the role of chromatin structure in proviral latency establishment, reactivation ability, proliferation potential of infected cells, and evasion of the immune system. Technical advances in the last years have enabled single cell determination of individual proviral sequences together with the integration sites [6,7,8], in combination with cell characteristics and epigenetic characterization of individual proviruses in single cells [9•, 10•]. Here, we summarize some of the last year’s findings regarding HIV-1 latency mechanisms, focusing on chromatin features, the dynamics of the proviral reservoir, and inter-individual differences that may be exploited for personalized medicine.
Initial Infection and Establishment of the Reservoir
The acute phase of the HIV-1 infection, signifying the initial weeks post-HIV-1 acquisition, is associated with a rapid rise in plasma viremia and is critical to the long-term development of the infection [11, 12]. During this period, the virus inflicts substantial immunological damage and establishes a persistent reservoir of infected cells. HIV-1 rapidly targets a diverse pool of CD4 + T cells to establish both productive and latent infections [13•]. While HIV-1 mainly infects activated CD4 + T cells, it can also infect cells that do not actively proliferate [14,15,16]. The set of cells being infected develops throughout the acute stages of HIV-1 infection (Fiebig I-V), exhibiting differences between cells in blood and lymphatic compartments [17••]. Early antiretroviral therapy (ART) has a significant effect on the reservoir size in Fiebig stage II/III [17••]. As the infection transits from the acute to the chronic phase, target cell types diverge [13•, 18]. Ultimately, the latent HIV-1 reservoir persists mainly in a small population of long-lived memory CD4 + T cells and macrophages [19,20,21, 22••].
Initial HIV-1 infection triggers a potent immune response. However, the establishment of the viral reservoir precedes seroconversion (Fiebig I-II) and the maturation of the adaptive immune response. Instead, the innate immune response is triggered at these earliest stages of infection [23]. Here, dendritic cells recognize viral RNA via Toll-like receptors (TLRs), specifically TLR7 and TLR8, that trigger the release of proinflammatory cytokines and type I interferons. This in turn stimulates CD4 + T cells [24], promoting their infection and establishment of the reservoir. TLR7 agonists have emerged as promising HIV-1 latency reversal agents, with efficacy demonstrated in primate studies [25, 26•]. Once the adaptive immune response is trained, the initial reservoir is already established [13•, 17••].
The infection creates a diverse initial reservoir of cells with unique integration sites. Within the reservoir, only a few cells have an inducible and intact provirus, capable of reseeding the infection. These cells are the crucial targets for a potential HIV-1 cure. During the initial Fiebig stages when the reservoir emerges, CD4 + T cells responsive to the innate immune activation are likely to be infected [27]. As the infection progresses, HIV-1 specific CD4 + T cells develop to recognize the virus, and these cells are more likely to be re-activated upon novel HIV-1 exposure and therefore infected. This could be a reason why the reservoirs formed at the acute and chronic stages of HIV-1 infection are distinct, and thus differentially targeted by ART [17••]. A current challenge in the field relates to most studies employing a universal reactivation that indiscriminately stimulates all CD4 + T cells, potentially overshadowing discrete effects of different mechanisms of physiological latency reversal.
HIV-1 Integration Affects Proviral Plasticity
Following the viral entry into the cell and nucleus [28], the HIV-1 RNA is reverse transcribed into double-stranded DNA. Histones then bind to the linear DNA before integration to form nucleosomes [29]. Normally, integration into the host genome follows rapidly upon nuclear entry [28]. HIV-1 integration is favoured in active genes [30], primarily at genomic loci with an open accessible structure [31, 32]. These regions are associated with histone modifications such as H3K36me3 [33], recognized by the HIV-1 integrase and its host interactors [34]. Some latency is induced when T cells and their active genes transition to a resting state [35]. Other mechanisms of latency establishment have also been explored. For example, a delay between viral nuclear entry and integration leads to the histones acquiring silencing marks via interaction with the SMC5/6 complex [36•]. The SMC5/6 belongs to the structural maintenance of chromosome (SMC) complexes, including condensin and cohesin, which topologically fold chromatin. However, the ability of the silenced pre-integration HIV-1 complexes to integrate into the host genome remains uncertain.
Chromatin activity is confined within chromatin domain boundaries. Through position effects, the provirus is assumed to take the form of the integration site [37], where chromatin marks spread over adjacent regions, until a boundary is reached, such as a CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF) binding site. Whereas CTCF boundaries act as insulators between chromatin domains, within these domains, smaller compartments are delineated by transcription and 3D interactions. These transcriptionally induced local microenvironments may be maintained by the SMC5/6 [38], providing a second function for SMC5/6 in controlling HIV-1 transcription. SMC5/6 has a role in resolving transcriptionally induced topological stress [39, 40].
Given that HIV-1 integration can occur in both directions of host gene transcription, topological stress following convergent transcription necessitate either silencing of the provirus or the host gene. This suggests that despite integration in active regions, proviruses can still be silenced by host mechanisms. Notably, a gradual accumulation of silencing marks on proviral chromatin has been observed even in in vitro cultures [41•]. This could be attributed to an array of factors, such as selective proliferation, toxicity of HIV-1 proteins, or other host mechanisms. This plasticity complicates the reservoir analysis. Technically, most studies infer the chromatin structure from the integration site, but it is unclear if the proviruses adopt this inferred epigenetic state. There is also the possibility that the epigenetic state of the host genome is altered by integration—a significant issue that merits further exploration.
To characterize the proviral chromatin in individual cells, techniques are currently being developed. Using our recently published technique, based on the proximity ligation assay, we could identify the chromatin composition of HIV-1 in single cells [9•, 42]. This technique may be combined with the determination of the transcriptional activity of the proviruses, resulting in viral RNA and proteins (Fig. 1) [9•, 42]. By linking chromatin composition and transcriptional output in single cells, we may identify mechanisms underlying latency maintenance and reversal.
Latent Cells with Reactivation Ability
When proviral integration occurs in activated loci in stimulated CD4 + T cells, the activity of the provirus typically aligns with the status of the cell. However, uncoupling of cell state and proviral state is observed [43, 44]. Nevertheless, the proviral chromatin in resting cells affects the proviral activity after T cell stimulation (Fig. 2A). Deep viral latency is marked by low or no viral transcription even in activated cells. Nevertheless, irrespective of cell activation status, promoter-proximal transcription is frequently detected [41•, 45, 46]. These short transcripts are important as they correlate with time to rebound after ART interruption [47, 48•].
Some chromatin compartments are not clearly defined as active or silent. Enhancer regions are open regions that are transcribed, but the resulting transcripts are not translated. HIV-1 integration occurs frequently in these regions [32, 49]. Such integration offers a strategic hiding spot for the virus, enabling maintained activation potential, while avoiding immune recognition as no viral proteins are expressed. However, the viral Tat protein can alter this microenvironment by recruiting CBP/P300 and pTEFb to the HIV-1 promoter [50], changing the proviral chromatin into a gene-like structure that supports mRNA processing and protein production [9•, 41•]. A significant feature distinguishing enhancers from genes in host sequences is the presence of a splice donor within the first nucleosomes of protein coding genes [51]. HIV-1 encodes this splice donor, but its exposure can be modulated by nucleosome repositioning and Tat-recruitment [52, 53]. This ability allows HIV-1 to toggle between enhancer-like transcription and gene-like transcription [41•]. Although these cells are transcribing part of the provirus, they can be regarded as latent since they are not translated into functional proteins.
Proliferation of Infected Cells Shapes the HIV-1 Reservoir
The fate of an infected cell is influenced by various factors including its metabolic state, the chromatin activity at the integration site, the cell type, and external factors such as the state of the immune defense. Over time, the HIV-1 reservoir size is largely preserved under ART, attributed to cellular proliferation rather than de novo infections [54]. With prolonged time under ART, a selection for latent or immune evasive CD4 + T cells arises as other cells are eliminated. This selection pressure gradually results in a more clonal reservoir [55, 56] (Fig. 2B). Selective proliferation gradually transforms the initial heterogeneous and dynamic HIV-1 reservoir into a more homogeneous entity, resulting in significant inter-individual differences.
Both homeostatic or antigen-driven proliferation ensure maintenance and promote evolution of the HIV-1 reservoir [57••]. Homeostatic proliferation typically involves cellular division without proviral activation, allowing latent HIV-1 to persist [58]. Conversely, antigen-driven proliferation, stimulated by both HIV-1 and other external antigens, triggers the activation of CD4 + T cells [59, 60].
The balance of the HIV-1 reservoir following T cell activation is maintained through the opposing forces of clonal expansion and toxicity or activation-induced cell death. Cells infected with an activatable provirus, capable of producing functional viral proteins, face a relatively high risk of elimination. Consequently, under an extended period of ART when the reservoir is maintained by proliferation, the intact—or mildly defective—and activatable proviral reservoir declines. In contrast, epigenetically repressed intact proviruses remain silent and consequently are protected from elimination [61••]. This reduces the potential for viral rebound in time.
Defective vs. Intact Proviruses in HIV-1 Reservoir Dynamics
The HIV-1 reservoir of intact inducible proviruses capable of regenerating rebound viruses after treatment interruption constitutes a minute fraction of the reservoir. However, this fraction is critical to cure the HIV-1 infection, whereas other segments of the reservoir can still profoundly impact chronic immune activation, carcinogenesis, psychological issues, and stigma among other issues [62•].
Reservoir cells with intact proviruses decay faster but become more clonal over time [54]. Conversely, cells harboring defective proviruses have been reported to decay at a slower rate [53, 63,64,65, 66•]. Yet, the nature and impact of these defective proviruses vary widely. For instance, some defective proviruses express proteins that are both toxic and immunogenic [62•, 67, 68•], whereas proviruses with detrimental mutations have lost this ability. Read-through transcription of downstream host genes has been observed [69] that also may correlate with proliferation depending on the proviral integration site [70]. These various defects contribute to large variation in reservoir decay kinetics [56]. Defective proviruses containing intact internal coding sequences are under different selective pressure than those that are not translation competent, i.e., proviruses missing internal genes decay faster than noncoding proviruses. The viral proteins Nef and Gag are among the most immunogenic [71], and consequentially gag is the viral gene most often missing in defective proviruses [63]. Intriguingly, some defective proviruses can produce viral particles, potentially contributing to persistent immune activation [60]. If defective viruses express Nef to downregulate immune response or to boost anti-apoptotic mechanisms, their rate of decline may be effectively stalled.
Drawing Parallels to Cancer Dynamics
When considering the HIV-1 reservoir in virally suppressed individuals under long-term ART, cancer may serve as an analogy. In oncology, only a minority of cells possess the capability to divide indefinitely and propagate the disease. The majority of cancer cells have limited proliferative potential and therefore do not directly contribute to disease progression. Likewise, within the HIV-1 reservoir, only the small fraction of intact, inducible proviruses can generate rebound viruses to reseed the infection should ART be interrupted. The bulk of the reservoir, although larger, harbors defective proviruses which are less critical to viral rebound and unable to propagate the infection. In cancer treatment, the objective is to eradicate every single cell exhibiting stem-like properties due to their potential to regenerate the tumor. Similarly, in the pursuit of an HIV-1 cure, the challenge is to eliminate all cells capable of producing infectious viruses that spread or reseed the infection [72].
Immune Evasion Affecting the HIV-1 Reservoir
The survival of infected cells can be attributed to a multitude of mechanisms, such as immune evasion [73], upregulation of anti-apoptotic genes [74], induction of cell survival pathways [70, 75], and the downregulation of anti-proliferative genes [76]. Host responses can also directly repress HIV-1 transcription, further complicating the elimination of infected cells [77].
The presence of active viral transcription and protein production renders HIV-1-infected cells more prone to recognition and elimination by the host immune system [78]. Interestingly, a small subset of cells can exhibit continuous HIV-1 expression, even under ART [46]. At least some of these cells are likely to be clones of cytotoxic CD4 + T cells [79••]. This cell population expands during HIV-1 infection, and cytotoxic CD4 + T cells can release cytolytic granules to eliminate CD8 + T cells targeting them [80].
One question that emerges here is whether these perpetually HIV-1-expressing cells contribute to the phenomenon of non-suppressible viremia (NSV). The rare occurrence of NSV has made this phenomenon challenging to study. In individuals exhibiting NSV, large clones of HIV-1-expressing cells have been identified [81•]. However, these clones have been associated with defects in the 5′ RNA, resulting in defective, non-infectious virions observed as NSV [82••]. These RNAs most often lack the strongly immunogenic gag [63] and therefore have the possibility to persist even in non-cytotoxic CD4 + T cells. Residual viremia does not correlate with inflammation under ART, and a recent study even concluded that HIV-1 persistence under ART does not drive or respond to inflammation or immune activation [65].
Infected Cells with Non-reactivatable Provirus
Infected cells in which the intact provirus is permanently silenced can be viewed as eliminated from the reservoir, given their incapacity to generate viruses. “Elite controllers” (ECs), a small subset of people living with HIV-1 who maintain undetectable levels of plasma viremia in the absence of ART, may serve as a model to achieve a functional cure. A significant proportion of ECs have the protective HLA-B*57 allele, which also can be found in non-ECs [83]. ECs tend to have a small reservoir size, but this does not automatically imply infection control [84]. These factors do not allow identification of ECs. Recently, it was discovered that the HIV-1 integration sites in ECs are biased towards transcriptionally inert heterochromatin regions [85]. Interestingly, such bias towards heterochromatin regions also appears to occur after long-term ART that extends beyond 20 years [61••]. Even though HIV-1 integration only rarely occurs in silent chromatin regions, mutations in the viral integrase protein can stimulate heterochromatin targeting [86•]. Cells with proviruses integrated into heterochromatic regions are detected already in the acute stages of infection [13•]. While cells with proviruses in heterochromatin are expected to be scarce initially, their proportion gradually increases over time, largely due to their evasion from selection pressure exerted by viral protein toxicity or immune recognition [61••].
This raises an intriguing question: could post-treatment controllers have their reservoirs evolved so that only heterochromatin-integrated proviruses remain? It is conceivable that post-treatment control could arise from the reservoir gradually assuming characteristics similar to those of ECs’ reservoirs after extended treatment periods.
Reservoir Location
While the core insights about the HIV-1 reservoir are primarily derived from studies on peripheral blood and CD4 + T cells, the HIV-1 reservoir persists in various tissues, including lymph nodes, gut, spleen, and brain [87, 88]. However, peripheral blood serves as the main source of dispersal, giving it a reflection of the most compartments of the reservoir [89••]. Macrophages represent another key cell type involved in the long-term maintenance of the HIV-1 reservoir, either through direct infection, engulfment, or cell fusion [22••, 90, 91]. Although the macrophage reservoir is distinct from that of CD4 + T cells and generally lower in viral content, its potential to facilitate viral spread renders it a critical component to consider in reservoir studies [22••]. The anatomical source of the rebound viruses after ART interruption remains elusive but peripheral blood contains traces of most reservoir cells found in tissues [92]. This underscores the importance of a comprehensive understanding of the reservoir’s distribution across different tissue types for successful HIV-1 eradication strategies.
Conclusions
In conclusion, recent insights into the HIV-1 reservoir have revealed intricate details of the infected cells, the influence of proviral integration sites and the role of single-cell histone modifications. This has led to an understanding of how cell proliferation together with the immune system sculpts the reservoir in the absence of free virus (Fig. 2). An emphasis on chromatin features, proviral reservoir dynamics, and inter-individual differences offers a comprehensive perspective that could significantly enhance HIV-1 treatment precision and effectiveness. To manipulate these molecular mechanisms to eradicate the reservoir, a detailed understanding of the single cells capable of instigating new viral production is crucial. In single cells, we need to identify the mechanisms that keep the provirus latent and reactivatable, and the triggers that activate it. Long-term ART has led to a high diversity in HIV-1 reservoirs among individuals. These unique HIV-1 reservoirs will require specific treatment for their eradication, making personalized medicine a necessity to achieve a global HIV-1 cure.
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS. UNAIDS DATA 2022 [Internet]. Geneva; 2022. https://www.unaids.org/en/resources/documents/2023/2022_unaids_data. Accessed 9 June 2023.
Verdin E, Paras P, Van Lint C. Chromatin disruption in the promoter of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 during transcriptional activation. EMBO J. 1993;12:3249–59.
Pearson R, Kim YK, Hokello J, Lassen K, Friedman J, Tyagi M, et al. Epigenetic silencing of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transcription by formation of restrictive chromatin structures at the viral long terminal repeat drives the progressive entry of HIV into latency. J Virol. 2008;82:12291–303.
Kauder SE, Bosque A, Lindqvist A, Planelles V, Verdin E. Epigenetic regulation of HIV-1 latency by cytosine methylation. Ross S, editor. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5:e1000495.
Tyagi M, Pearson RJ, Karn J. Establishment of HIV latency in primary CD4 + cells is due to epigenetic transcriptional silencing and P-TEFb restriction. J Virol. 2010;84:6425–37.
Einkauf KB, Lee GQ, Gao C, Sharaf R, Sun X, Hua S, et al. Intact HIV-1 proviruses accumulate at distinct chromosomal positions during prolonged antiretroviral therapy. J Clin Invest. 2019;129:988–98.
Patro SC, Brandt LD, Bale MJ, Halvas EK, Joseph KW, Shao W, et al. Combined HIV-1 sequence and integration site analysis informs viral dynamics and allows reconstruction of replicating viral ancestors. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2019;116:25891–9.
Sun C, Liu L, Pérez L, Li X, Liu Y, Xu P, et al. Droplet-microfluidics-assisted sequencing of HIV proviruses and their integration sites in cells from people on antiretroviral therapy. Nat Biomed Eng. 2022;6:1004–12.
• Lindqvist B, Jütte BB, Love L, Assi W, Roux J, Sönnerborg A, et al. T cell stimulation remodels the latently HIV-1 infected cell population by differential activation of proviral chromatin. PLoS Pathog. 2022;18:e1010555. Study pioneering the proximity ligation assay (PLA) based technique to assess the proviral chromatin environment in single cells to understand its impact on the HIV-1 reactivation potential.
• Sun W, Gao C, Hartana CA, Osborn MR, Einkauf KB, Lian X, et al. Phenotypic signatures of immune selection in HIV-1 reservoir cells. Nature. 2023;614:309–17. Recent study demonstrating that cells harboring intact HIV-1 proviruses frequently express surface markers associated with resistance to immune-mediated killing.
Robb ML, Eller LA, Kibuuka H, Rono K, Maganga L, Nitayaphan S, et al. Prospective study of acute HIV-1 infection in adults in East Africa and Thailand. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:2120–30.
Coffin JM, Wells DW, Zerbato JM, Kuruc JD, Guo S, Luke BT, et al. Clones of infected cells arise early in HIV-infected individuals. JCI Insight. 2019;4:e128432.
• Gantner P, Buranapraditkun S, Pagliuzza A, Dufour C, Pardons M, Mitchell JL, et al. HIV rapidly targets a diverse pool of CD4+ T cells to establish productive and latent infections. Immunity. 2023;56:653–668.e5. Study demonstrating that targets of the early HIV-1 infection change rapidly and the latent proviral reservoir is archived from the earliest stages of infection.
Zhang Z-Q, Schuler T, Zupancic M, Wietgrefe S, Staskus KA, Reimann KA, et al. Sexual transmission and propagation of SIV and HIV in resting and activated CD4 + T Cells. Science. 1999;286:1353–7.
Saleh S, Solomon A, Wightman F, Xhilaga M, Cameron PU, Lewin SR. CCR7 ligands CCL19 and CCL21 increase permissiveness of resting memory CD4+ T cells to HIV-1 infection: a novel model of HIV-1 latency. Blood. 2007;110:4161–4.
Cameron PU, Saleh S, Sallmann G, Solomon A, Wightman F, Evans VA, et al. Establishment of HIV-1 latency in resting CD4 + T cells depends on chemokine-induced changes in the actin cytoskeleton. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2010;107:16934–9.
•• Leyre L, Kroon E, Vandergeeten C, Sacdalan C, Colby DJ, Buranapraditkun S, et al. Abundant HIV-infected cells in blood and tissues are rapidly cleared upon ART initiation during acute HIV infection. Sci Transl Med. 2020;12:eaav3491. A longitudinal study showing that lymphoid tissues contain a higher number of latently infected cells than blood. ART initiation at early Fiebig stages I to III was most effective at clearing HIV-1 infected cells.
Perreau M, Savoye A-L, De Crignis E, Corpataux J-M, Cubas R, Haddad EK, et al. Follicular helper T cells serve as the major CD4 T cell compartment for HIV-1 infection, replication, and production. J Exp Med. 2013;210:143–56.
Chun TW, Stuyver L, Mizell SB, Ehler LA, Mican JA, Baseler M, et al. Presence of an inducible HIV-1 latent reservoir during highly active antiretroviral therapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94:13193–7.
Finzi D, Hermankova M, Pierson T, Carruth LM, Buck C, Chaisson RE, et al. Identification of a reservoir for HIV-1 in patients on highly active antiretroviral therapy. Science. 1997;278:1295–300.
Wong JK, Hezareh M, Günthard HF, Havlir DV, Ignacio CC, Spina CA, et al. Recovery of replication-competent HIV despite prolonged suppression of plasma viremia. Science. 1997;278:1291–5.
•• Veenhuis RT, Abreu CM, Costa PAG, Ferreira EA, Ratliff J, Pohlenz L, et al. Monocyte-derived macrophages contain persistent latent HIV reservoirs. Nat Microbiol. 2023;8:833–844. HIV-1 containing macrophages are able to infect bystander cells in a quantitative viral outgrowth assay.
Gondim MVP, Sherrill-Mix S, Bibollet-Ruche F, Russell RM, Trimboli S, Smith AG, et al. Heightened resistance to host type 1 interferons characterizes HIV-1 at transmission and after antiretroviral therapy interruption. Sci Transl Med. 2021;13:eabd8179.
Beignon A-S, McKenna K, Skoberne M, Manches O, DaSilva I, Kavanagh DG, et al. Endocytosis of HIV-1 activates plasmacytoid dendritic cells via Toll-like receptor-viral RNA interactions. J Clin Invest. 2005;115:3265–75.
Lim S-Y, Osuna CE, Hraber PT, Hesselgesser J, Gerold JM, Barnes TL, et al. TLR7 agonists induce transient viremia and reduce the viral reservoir in SIV-infected rhesus macaques on antiretroviral therapy. Sci Transl Med. 2018;10:eaao4521.
• SenGupta D, Brinson C, DeJesus E, Mills A, Shalit P, Guo S, et al. The TLR7 agonist vesatolimod induced a modest delay in viral rebound in HIV controllers after cessation of antiretroviral therapy. Sci Transl Med. 2021;13:eabg3071. An analytical treatment interruption study showing that TRL7 agonist increased time to rebound and reduced the frequency of cells harboring intact virus.
Douek DC, Brenchley JM, Betts MR, Ambrozak DR, Hill BJ, Okamoto Y, et al. HIV preferentially infects HIV-specific CD4+ T cells. Nature. 2002;417:95–8.
Zila V, Margiotta E, Turoňová B, Müller TG, Zimmerli CE, Mattei S, et al. Cone-shaped HIV-1 capsids are transported through intact nuclear pores. Cell. 2021;184:1032-1046.e18.
Geis FK, Goff SP. Unintegrated HIV-1 DNAs are loaded with core and linker histones and transcriptionally silenced. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2019;116:23735–42.
Schröder ARW, Shinn P, Chen H, Berry C, Ecker JR, Bushman F. HIV-1 integration in the human genome favors active genes and local hotspots. Cell. 2002;110:521–9.
Wang GP, Ciuffi A, Leipzig J, Berry CC, Bushman FD. HIV integration site selection: analysis by massively parallel pyrosequencing reveals association with epigenetic modifications. Genome Res. 2007;17:1186–94.
Battivelli E, Dahabieh MS, Abdel-Mohsen M, da Svensson JP, Silva IT, Cohn LB, et al. Distinct chromatin functional states correlate with HIV latency reactivation in infected primary CD4+ T cells. ELife. 2018;7:e34655.
Sapp N, Burge N, Cox K, Prakash P, Balasubramaniam M, Thapa S, et al. HIV-1 Preintegration complex preferentially integrates the viral DNA into nucleosomes containing trimethylated histone 3-lysine 36 modification and flanking linker DNA. J Virol. 2022;96:e0101122.
Ciuffi A, Llano M, Poeschla E, Hoffmann C, Leipzig J, Shinn P, et al. A role for LEDGF/p75 in targeting HIV DNA integration. Nat Med. 2005;11:1287–9.
Shan L, Deng K, Gao H, Xing S, Capoferri AA, Durand CM, et al. Transcriptional reprogramming during effector-to-memory transition renders CD4+ T cells permissive for latent HIV-1 infection. Immunity. 2017;47:766-775.e3.
• Irwan ID, Bogerd HP, Cullen BR. Epigenetic silencing by the SMC5/6 complex mediates HIV-1 latency. Nat Microbiol. 2022;7:2101–13. The structural maintenance of chromosome (SMC) 5/6 is shown to silence unintegrated HIV-1 by SUMOlation of unintegrated chromatinized HIV-1 DNA.
Chen H-C, Martinez JP, Zorita E, Meyerhans A, Filion GJ. Position effects influence HIV latency reversal. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2017;24:47–54.
Pradhan B, Kanno T, Umeda Igarashi M, Loke MS, Baaske MD, Wong JSK, et al. The Smc5/6 complex is a DNA loop-extruding motor. Nature. 2023;616:843–8.
Betts Lindroos H, Ström L, Itoh T, Katou Y, Shirahige K, Sjögren C. Chromosomal association of the Smc5/6 complex reveals that it functions in differently regulated pathways. Mol Cell. 2006;22:755–67.
Kegel A, Betts-Lindroos H, Kanno T, Jeppsson K, Ström L, Katou Y, et al. Chromosome length influences replication-induced topological stress. Nature. 2011;471:392–6.
• Lindqvist B, Svensson Akusjärvi S, Sönnerborg A, Dimitriou M, Svensson JP. Chromatin maturation of the HIV-1 provirus in primary resting CD4+ T cells. PLoS Pathog. 2020;16:e1008264. The latent HIV-1 reservoir evolves over time with increased heterochromatin. HIV-1 proviruses with enhancer chromatin actively promoted latency.
Wang P, Qu X, Wang X, Zhu X, Zeng H, Chen H, et al. Specific reactivation of latent HIV-1 with designer zinc-finger transcription factors targeting the HIV-1 5′-LTR promoter. Gene Ther. 2014;21:490–5.
Weinberger LS, Dar RD, Simpson ML. Transient-mediated fate determination in a transcriptional circuit of HIV. Nat Genet. 2008;40:466–70.
Razooky BS, Cao Y, Hansen MMK, Perelson AS, Simpson ML, Weinberger LS. Nonlatching positive feedback enables robust bimodality by decoupling expression noise from the mean. PLoS Biol. 2017;15:e2000841.
Yukl SA, Kaiser P, Kim P, Telwatte S, Joshi SK, Vu M, et al. HIV latency in isolated patient CD4+ T cells may be due to blocks in HIV transcriptional elongation, completion, and splicing. Sci Transl Med. 2018;10:eaap9927.
Wietgrefe SW, Duan L, Anderson J, Marqués G, Sanders M, Cummins NW, et al. Detecting sources of immune activation and viral rebound in HIV infection. J Virol. 2022;96:e00885-e922.
Moron-Lopez S, Kim P, Søgaard OS, Tolstrup M, Wong JK, Yukl SA. Characterization of the HIV-1 transcription profile after romidepsin administration in ART-suppressed individuals. AIDS. 2019;33:425–31.
• Pasternak AO, Grijsen ML, Wit FW, Bakker M, Jurriaans S, Prins JM, et al. Cell-associated HIV-1 RNA predicts viral rebound and disease progression after discontinuation of temporary early ART. JCI Insight. 2020;5:e134196. HIV-1 cell associated RNA is reported as a predictor of the virological and immunological response to early ART, the magnitude and time to viral rebound after discontinuation of ART, and disease progression in the absence of treatment.
Lucic B, Chen H-C, Kuzman M, Zorita E, Wegner J, Minneker V, et al. Spatially clustered loci with multiple enhancers are frequent targets of HIV-1 integration. Nat Commun. 2019;10:4059.
Marzio G, Tyagi M, Gutierrez MI, Giacca M. HIV-1 Tat transactivator recruits p300 and CREB-binding protein histone acetyltransferases to the viral promoter. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1998;95:13519–24.
Andersson R, Gebhard C, Miguel-Escalada I, Hoof I, Bornholdt J, Boyd M, et al. An atlas of active enhancers across human cell types and tissues. Nature. 2014;507:455–61.
Van Lint C, Emiliani S, Ott M, Verdin E. Transcriptional activation and chromatin remodeling of the HIV-1 promoter in response to histone acetylation. EMBO J. 1996;15:1112–20.
Rafati H, Parra M, Hakre S, Moshkin Y, Verdin E, Mahmoudi T. Repressive LTR nucleosome positioning by the BAF complex is required for HIV latency. PLoS Biol. 2011;9:e1001206.
Chomont N, El-Far M, Ancuta P, Trautmann L, Procopio FA, Yassine-Diab B, et al. HIV reservoir size and persistence are driven by T cell survival and homeostatic proliferation. Nat Med. 2009;15:893–900.
Antar AAR, Jenike KM, Jang S, Rigau DN, Reeves DB, Hoh R, et al. Longitudinal study reveals HIV-1–infected CD4+ T cell dynamics during long-term antiretroviral therapy. J Clin Invest. 2020;130:3543–59.
Cho A, Gaebler C, Olveira T, Ramos V, Saad M, Lorenzi JCC, et al. Longitudinal clonal dynamics of HIV-1 latent reservoirs measured by combination quadruplex polymerase chain reaction and sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2022;119:e2117630119.
•• Simonetti FR, Zhang H, Soroosh GP, Duan J, Rhodehouse K, Hill AL, et al. Antigen-driven clonal selection shapes the persistence of HIV-1–infected CD4+ T cells in vivo. J Clin Invest. 2021;131:e145254. Study that demonstrates the role of recurrent antigen exposure in the maintainance of the HIV-1 reservoir.
Bosque A, Famiglietti M, Weyrich AS, Goulston C, Planelles V. Homeostatic proliferation fails to efficiently reactivate HIV-1 latently infected central memory CD4+ T cells. PLoS Pathog. 2011;7:e1002288.
Hey-Nguyen WJ, Bailey M, Xu Y, Suzuki K, Van Bockel D, Finlayson R, et al. HIV-1 DNA is maintained in antigen-specific CD4+ T cell subsets in patients on long-term antiretroviral therapy regardless of recurrent antigen exposure. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2019;35:112–20.
Mendoza P, Jackson JR, Oliveira TY, Gaebler C, Ramos V, Caskey M, et al. Antigen-responsive CD4+ T cell clones contribute to the HIV-1 latent reservoir. J Exp Med. 2020;217:e20200051.
•• Lian X, Seiger KW, Parsons EM, Gao C, Sun W, Gladkov GT, et al. Progressive transformation of the HIV-1 reservoir cell profile over two decades of antiviral therapy. Cell Host Microbe. 2023;31:83–96.e5. A longitudinal study of HIV-1 integration sites under ART. Due to host selection pressure and ART, the reservoir becomes more clonal with large clones integrated in heterochromatin regions.
• Imamichi H, Smith M, Adelsberger JW, Izumi T, Scrimieri F, Sherman BT, et al. Defective HIV-1 proviruses produce viral proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117:3704–10. Identification of HIV-1 protein production and persistent immune activation from defective proviruses.
Pinzone MR, VanBelzen DJ, Weissman S, Bertuccio MP, Cannon L, Venanzi-Rullo E, et al. Longitudinal HIV sequencing reveals reservoir expression leading to decay which is obscured by clonal expansion. Nat Commun. 2019;10:728.
Peluso MJ, Bacchetti P, Ritter KD, Beg S, Lai J, Martin JN, et al. Differential decay of intact and defective proviral DNA in HIV-1–infected individuals on suppressive antiretroviral therapy. JCI Insight. 2020;5:e132997.
Gandhi RT, Cyktor JC, Bosch RJ, Mar H, Laird GM, Martin A, et al. Selective decay of intact HIV-1 proviral DNA on antiretroviral therapy. J Infect Dis. 2021;223:225–33.
• Einkauf KB, Osborn MR, Gao C, Sun W, Sun X, Lian X, et al. Parallel analysis of transcription, integration, and sequence of single HIV-1 proviruses. Cell. 2022;185:266–282.e15. Study describing a global genomic and epigenetic map of transcriptionally active and silent HIV-1 proviruses by using a new multi-dimensional single-cell analyses (PRIP-seq).
Pollack RA, Jones RB, Pertea M, Bruner KM, Martin AR, Thomas AS, et al. Defective HIV-1 proviruses are expressed and can be recognized by cytotoxic T lymphocytes, which shape the proviral landscape. Cell Host Microbe. 2017;21:494–506.
• Cole B, Lambrechts L, Gantner P, Noppe Y, Bonine N, Witkowski W, et al. In-depth single-cell analysis of translation-competent HIV-1 reservoirs identifies cellular sources of plasma viremia. Nat Commun. 2021;12:3727. Simultaneous integration site, provirus and T cell receptor sequencing reveal that the translation-competent reservoir mainly consists of proviruses with short deletions at the 5’-end of the genome.
Liu R, Yeh Y-HJ, Varabyou A, Collora JA, Sherrill-Mix S, Talbot CC, et al. Single-cell transcriptional landscapes reveal HIV-1–driven aberrant host gene transcription as a potential therapeutic target. Sci Transl Med. 2020;12:eaaz0802.
Wagner TA, McLaughlin S, Garg K, Cheung CYK, Larsen BB, Styrchak S, et al. Proliferation of cells with HIV integrated into cancer genes contributes to persistent infection. Science. 2014;345:570–3.
Kaufmann DE, Bailey PM, Sidney J, Wagner B, Norris PJ, Johnston MN, et al. Comprehensive analysis of human immunodeficiency virus type 1-specific CD4 responses reveals marked immunodominance of gag and nef and the presence of broadly recognized peptides. J Virol. 2004;78:4463–77.
Svensson JP. Targeting epigenetics to cure HIV-1: Lessons from (and for) cancer treatment. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021;11:668637.
Wang Y, Qian G, Zhu L, Zhao Z, Liu Y, Han W, et al. HIV-1 Vif suppresses antiviral immunity by targeting STING. Cell Mol Immunol. 2022;19:108–21.
Kuo H-H, Ahmad R, Lee GQ, Gao C, Chen H-R, Ouyang Z, et al. Anti-apoptotic protein BIRC5 maintains survival of HIV-1-Iifected CD4+ T Cells. Immunity. 2018;48:1183-1194.e5.
Ren Y, Huang SH, Patel S, Alberto WDC, Magat D, Ahimovic D, et al. BCL-2 antagonism sensitizes cytotoxic T cell–resistant HIV reservoirs to elimination ex vivo. J Clin Invest. 2020;130:2542–59.
Clark IC, Mudvari P, Thaploo S, Smith S, Abu-Laban M, Hamouda M, et al. HIV silencing and cell survival signatures in infected T cell reservoirs. Nature. 2023;614:318–25.
Cohn LB, da Silva IT, Valieris R, Huang AS, Lorenzi JCC, Cohen YZ, et al. Clonal CD4+ T cells in the HIV-1 latent reservoir display a distinct gene profile upon reactivation. Nat Med. 2018;24:604–9.
Gao D, Wu J, Wu Y-T, Du F, Aroh C, Yan N, et al. Cyclic GMP-AMP synthase is an innate immune sensor of HIV and other retroviruses. Science. 2013;341:903–6.
•• Collora JA, Liu R, Pinto-Santini D, Ravindra N, Ganoza C, Lama JR, et al. Single-cell multiomics reveals persistence of HIV-1 in expanded cytotoxic T cell clones. Immunity. 2022;55:1013–1031.e7. Multiomics show enrichment of HIV-1 expressing cells in GZMB+ cytotoxic effector memory Th1 cells.
Appay V, Zaunders JJ, Papagno L, Sutton J, Jaramillo A, Waters A, et al. Characterization of CD4+ CTLs ex vivo. J Immunol. 2002;168:5954–8.
• Halvas EK, Joseph KW, Brandt LD, Guo S, Sobolewski MD, Jacobs JL, et al. HIV-1 viremia not suppressible by antiretroviral therapy can originate from large T cell clones producing infectious virus. J Clin Invest. 2020;130:5847–57. Large, replication competent T cell clones cause non-ART suppressible viremia.
•• White JA, Wu F, Yasin S, Moskovljevic M, Varriale J, Dragoni F, et al. Clonally expanded HIV-1 proviruses with 5′-leader defects can give rise to nonsuppressible residual viremia. J Clin Invest. 2023;133:e165245. HIV-1 clones with 5′-leader defects in the major splice donor site are inducible and produce non-infectious virions lacking an envelope.
Migueles SA, Sabbaghian MS, Shupert WL, Bettinotti MP, Marincola FM, Martino L, et al. HLA B*5701 is highly associated with restriction of virus replication in a subgroup of HIV-infected long term nonprogressors. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2000;97:2709–14.
Trémeaux P, Lemoine F, Mélard A, Gousset M, Boufassa F, Orr S, et al. In-depth characterization of full-length archived viral genomes after nine years of posttreatment HIV control. Microbiol Spectr. 2023;11:e03267-e3322.
Jiang C, Lian X, Gao C, Sun X, Einkauf KB, Chevalier JM, et al. Distinct viral reservoirs in individuals with spontaneous control of HIV-1. Nature. 2020;585:261–7.
• Winans S, Yu HJ, de los Santos K, Wang GZ, KewalRamani VN, Goff SP. A point mutation in HIV-1 integrase redirects proviral integration into centromeric repeats. Nat Commun. 2022;13:1474. Recent study showing that mutations in the viral integrase gene can redirect integration sites into centromeric regions, similar to the integration site distribution of elite controllers.
Nolan DJ, Rose R, Rodriguez PH, Salemi M, Singer EJ, Lamers SL, et al. The spleen is an HIV-1 sanctuary during combined antiretroviral therapy. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2018;34:123–5.
Wu VH, Nobles CL, Kuri-Cervantes L, McCormick K, Everett JK, Nguyen S, et al. Assessment of HIV-1 integration in tissues and subsets across infection stages. JCI Insight. 2020;5:e139783.
•• Chaillon A, Gianella S, Dellicour S, Rawlings SA, Schlub TE, De Oliveira MF, et al. HIV persists throughout deep tissues with repopulation from multiple anatomical sources. J Clin Invest. 2020;130:1699–712. Blood and lymphoid tissues were found to be the main source of dispersal of large HIV-1 RNA+ clones leading to repopulation after treatment interruption.
Baxter AE, Russell RA, Duncan CJ, Moore MD, Willberg CB, Pablos JL, et al. Macrophage infection via selective capture of HIV-1-infected CD4+ T cells. Cell Host Microbe. 2014;16:711–21.
Mascarau R, Woottum M, Fromont L, Gence R, Cantaloube-Ferrieu V, Vahlas Z, et al. Productive HIV-1 infection of tissue macrophages by fusion with infected CD4+ T cells. J Cell Biol. 2023;222:e202205103.
Lu CL, Pai JA, Nogueira L, Mendoza P, Gruell H, Oliveira TY, et al. Relationship between intact HIV-1 proviruses in circulating CD4(+) T cells and rebound viruses emerging during treatment interruption. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115:E11341–8.
Funding
Open access funding provided by Karolinska Institute. BBJ is supported by a grant from Swedish Physicians Against AIDS Research Foundation (FOa2023-0003). JPS is supported by grants from CIMED (FoUI-973749) and Vetenskapsrådet (2019–00991).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
B.B.J., L.L. and J.P.S. wrote the main manuscript text and prepared the figures. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
All reported studies/experiments with human subjects performed by the authors have been previously published and complied with all applicable ethical standards (including the Helsinki declaration and its amendments, institutional/national research committee standards, and international/national/institutional guidelines).
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Bianca B. Jütte and Luca Love contributed equally to this work.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Jütte, B.B., Love, L. & Svensson, J.P. Molecular Mechanisms of HIV-1 Latency from a Chromatin and Epigenetic Perspective. Curr Clin Micro Rpt 10, 246–254 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40588-023-00208-3
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40588-023-00208-3