Abstract
An aerobiology sampling flight at 20 km was conducted on 28 April 2008 over the Pacific Ocean (36.5° N, 118–149° W), a period of time that coincided with the movement of Asian dust across the ocean. The aim of this study was to confirm the presence of viable bacteria and fungi within a transoceanic, atmospheric bridge and to improve the resolution of flight hardware processing techniques. Isolates of the microbial strains recovered were analyzed with ribosomal ribonucleic acid (rRNA) sequencing to identify bacterial species Bacillus sp., Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus endophyticus, and the fungal genus Penicillium. Satellite imagery and ground-based radiosonde observations were used to measure dust movement and characterize the high-altitude environment at the time of collection. Considering the atmospheric residency time (7–10 days), the extreme temperature regime of the environment (−75°C), and the absence of a mechanism that could sustain particulates at high altitude, it is unlikely that our samples indicate a permanent, stratospheric ecosystem. However, the presence of viable fungi and bacteria in transoceanic stratosphere remains relevant to understanding the distribution and extent of microbial life on Earth.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Microbial diversity in Earth’s upper atmosphere remains largely unexplored, despite its relevance to a number of scientific disciplines. Bacteria and fungi are injected into the atmosphere primarily by dust storms over arid regions of the planet, but hurricanes, volcanoes, fire, and anthropogenic sources also contribute to the total amount of biological material in the air. Meteorological factors control the altitude, distribution, and residency time of particles aloft (Deshler et al. 1993; Griffin et al. 2001; Bauman et al. 2003; Kellogg and Griffin 2006; Wainwright et al. 2006; Griffin 2007). Lower atmosphere (altitude 0–10 km) collections have documented how microorganisms can affect local ecology and climate. Global patterns of atmospheric dust and long-range dispersion can influence the spread of plant and animal pathogens (Griffin et al. 2001; Brown and Hovmøller 2002; Griffin 2007). Microbial cells contribute to precipitation as cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) or ice condensation nuclei (ICN), as discussed by Schnell and Vali (1976), Maki and Willoughby (1978), Szyrmer and Zawadzki (1997), Hamilton and Lenton (1998), Sun and Ariya (2006), Pratt et al. (2009), and Prenni et al. (2009). While most airborne microbes remain dormant during atmospheric transport, Sattler et al. (2001) documented growth of bacteria in supercooled cloud droplets (at or below 0°C) from samples collected at 3 km.
Clearly, bacteria and fungi are abundant in the troposphere, but what about even farther above the Earth’s surface? The biologically challenging environment in the stratosphere (10–50 km) would suggest that there would be lower viable biomass as altitude increases. For instance, the stratosphere has greater extremes of ultraviolet (UV) irradiation, desiccation, cold temperatures, and nutrient deprivation than the troposphere (Brasseur and Solomon 1986; Lysenko and Demina 1992; Nicholson et al. 2000). Yet, several studies conducted in the stratosphere have reported viable, airborne microbes (Imshenetsky et al. 1978; Lysenko 1980; Harris et al. 2002; Wainwright et al. 2002; Narlikar et al. 2003; Griffin 2004, 2008), including novel species (Shivaji et al. 2006). Missions to sample stratospheric biota have been historically infrequent, making it difficult to answer even basic ecological questions. For example, what is the diversity and distribution of microbial species at high altitudes? Is there a limit to their dispersion (vertical and horizontal)? What influences cell viability at high altitudes? Finally, and perhaps most interestingly, can growth and/or reproduction occur in situ at altitude? Investigating these topics with subsequent stratosphere collections is critical to understanding the true boundaries of the terrestrial biosphere.
The environmental factor most relevant to each question above is residency time—defined here as the total time that microbes remain aloft in the upper atmosphere. To date, no study has been able to determine whether residency time is on the order of days, months, or possibly even longer. Although satellites and ground instruments can track dust storms, neither can remotely detect airborne microbes. Our group recognized that sampling an air mass above the open ocean would be an effective way to assign a residency time by (1) eliminating the possibility of local dust injections and (2) comparing satellite-imaged dust trajectories with DNA sequence information to infer place of origin. In Asia, dust generated by the Gobi, Takla Makan, and Badain Jaran deserts blows seasonally across the Pacific Ocean from approximately March to May (Duce et al. 1980; Kar and Takeuchi 2004), eventually reaching the west coast of North America. Chemical measurements (Jaffe et al. 2003) and satellite imagery (Griffin 2007) have been used to estimate that Asian dust typically takes 7–10 days to cross the Pacific. Along a transoceanic route, some fraction of microbes will be removed from the air by precipitation or gravitational settling (Griffin et al. 2006). Collecting dust deposited in North America would subject microbes to heavy dilution and contamination from local sources. To avoid this problem, our group sampled an air mass that was still in transit over the Pacific Ocean using a high-altitude aircraft that offered precise instrumental control and a large collection range. We hypothesized that most microbial species recovered from the transoceanic air samples would trace back to Asian isolates, several thousand kilometers from the desert source, due to the timing and location of our collection.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Flight hardware
A modified impactor plate from the NASA Cosmic Dust Group at Johnson Space Center was designed to interface with a pressure-sealed, metal housing (serial number U2-144) that mounted onto the wingtip of a high altitude ER-2 aircraft (Lockheed Martin Corp. at NASA Dryden Flight Research Center) and was deployed by pilot command (Fig. 1). Details of the flight hardware have been published elsewhere (Griffin 2004, 2008). An exact replicate of the acrylic Cosmic Dust Group impactor plate (hereafter referred to as a ‘flag’ for its likeness in shape), measuring roughly 5.6 × 5.8 cm, was machined out of lightweight aluminum in order to make the system compatible with autoclaving. The aluminum flag was then textured on its leading-edge side with a sandblaster to increase its surface area and create additional attachment troughs for impacting atmosphere particles. Surface topography was confirmed with a high-resolution video microscope (model VH-7000, Keyence Corp. of America, Woodcliff Lake, NJ, USA).
2.2 Microbiology procedures, hardware preparation, and sampling flight
Difco™ R2A (18.2 g added to 1 l of deionized water) and potato dextrose agar (PDA) (39 g added to 1 l of deionized water; Difco media, Fisher Scientific, Pittsburg, PA) were used for solid growth of bacteria and fungi, respectively. A 10% dilution (3 g added to 1 l of deionized water) of tryptic soy broth (TSB) (Becton Dickinson and Company Sparks, MD) in 10 ml tubes was used for liquid growth of both bacteria and fungi.
Before flying, a series of hardware assembly/disassembly tests were conducted in the Space Life Sciences Laboratory at NASA Kennedy Space Center (FL, USA) to verify the sterility of autoclaved equipment, the sealed housing, and the hardware processing environment. All procedures were conducted under aseptic conditions, using a laminar flow hood (NuAire Inc., model NU-602-400, Plymouth, MN, USA) equipped with a UV irradiation light source. Prior to assembly, the flag and the metal housing were washed with 70% isopropanol, mated, placed in a tape-sealed sterilization pouch (Tower Dual Peel® Sterilization Pouch, Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Deerfield, IL, USA) to reduce moisture, and double autoclaved at 121°C for 20 min along with other tools required for the procedure; notably, razor blades and Allen wrenches required for the housing screw mounts. The unit was then disassembled so that a pre-sterilized 15 μl aliquot of glycerol could be applied to the surface of the flag, using a micropipette and razor blade for uniform spreading. Once re-assembled and autoclaved, the unit was placed in the laminar flow hood for 48 h to simulate pre-flight transportation/idle time. Using sterile techniques, the flag was then removed from the housing and left exposed in the laminar flow hood for 8 h to mimic a typical flight-sampling period. After exposure, the flag was placed face-down (see below for detail) on R2A media for a 2-week incubation period in a 30°C growth chamber (Innova 4230, New Brunswick Scientific, Edison, NJ, USA), and no growth was observed.
The assembly method (described above) was repeated for the hardware intended for flight. The pre-sterilized glycerol aliquot spread onto the flag was also applied onto R2A plates for negative control testing and no growth occurred over a 4-week incubation period. The hardware was shipped to NASA Dryden Flight Research Center where the complete system was mounted onto the wing payload bay of the ER-2 aircraft. On 28 April 2008, the aircraft departed (sortie # 08-6017) from Edwards Air Force Base (CA, USA) and deployed the flag at a sustained altitude of 20 km while maintaining an east-to-west transect (36.5° N, 118–149° W) over the Pacific Ocean (Fig. 2). The exposure to the stratosphere lasted for 7.5 h (opened 1416 Zulu and closed 2154 Zulu). The Pacific Ocean jet stream along the flight path was analyzed through infrared satellite images provided by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) (Fig. 3). Environmental conditions at the sampling altitude were modeled using radiosonde observations and geopotential height contour maps provided by the Naval Research Laboratory and the California Regional Weather Server (D. Westphal and D. Dempsey, personal communication, June 2008) from the nearest land-based station, KOAK (WMO identification # 72493), located at 37.73° N, 122.22° W (Fig. 4).
2.3 Post-flight processing
Upon receiving the flight hardware, the assembly was unpackaged in a UV disinfected (12 h) laminar flow hood. A novel swabbing procedure was employed on the flight hardware which (1) increased the number of samples compared to historical assays (Griffin 2004, 2008), (2) used several growth media (liquid and solid) to encourage diverse cell recovery, and (3) would provide a useful comparison between the flag and the internal/external surfaces of the flight housing, divided into various sampling sections: F (flag), EH (external housing), and IH (internal housing) (Fig. 5). With the housing still closed, EH samples were taken with autoclaved 10-cm cotton applicators that were moistened in sterile, deionized H2O. Each swab consisted of a surface rub of the cotton tip over the application spot. The contact side of the applicator was swabbed onto R2A media, then placed into 10 ml test tubes containing liquid TSB for a second growth opportunity. Negative controls with cotton applicators were performed periodically (N = 10) and there was no growth in liquid or solid media. Swabs were taken along the flag aluminum perimeter and backside before it was placed face-down on R2A. Finally, IH locations were swabbed, plated, and also introduced into liquid media. Test tubes and plates (parafilmed to prevent drying) were stored in a dark incubator at 30°C and monitored for growth. The face-down flag was transferred onto new R2A plates after time-steps of 1, 2, 4, 7, and 56 days.
2.4 Genetic identification
Bacterial cultures were isolated and archived at −20°C for genetic analysis. Subsets to be identified were grouped according to growth rate, medium preference, colony size, colony shape, pigmentation, and location on the sampling hardware. Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) extraction was performed, followed by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid (rRNA), according to previously described protocols (Griffin 2004). Universal primers listed in Grasby et al. (2003) were used for eight bacterial isolates, generating 1538 bp amplicons that were directly sequenced by Northwoods DNA, Inc. (Becida, MN). GenBank Blast (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST/) was utilized for sequence/isolate identification. Furthermore, three bacteria isolates were identified with a 466 bp 16S rRNA primer set described by Nadkarni et al. (2002) due to repeated sequencing errors noted with the larger primer set from Grasby et al. (2003). Table 1 provides the primer sets used for each bacterial isolate.
Fungal growth in liquid or solid media was immediately transferred to PDA and archived at 4°C for identification, noting growth rate and morphology for hyphae and fruiting bodies. After trying several primer sets in PCR, 18S rRNA for all fungal isolates were successfully amplified using primers NS3 and NS4 from White et al. (1990). Amplicons were directly sequenced and identified as described above with GenBank Blast.
3 Results
Bacteria were recovered from 6 of 27 possible locations on the flight hardware. The positive growth was from 4 F-sites and 2 EH-sites. Signs of growth in liquid media ranged from 24 to 96 h. Subsequently plated colonies were small and medium sized, non-pigmented, and had either a smooth/round or sharp/jagged appearance. Analysis by 16S rRNA for F-bacteria showed strong homology with Bacillus sp. at the genus level, with most species matched to Bacillus subtilis. The EH cultures were recovered from the lid (EH11) and base (EH7) of the housing, on solid media from the swabbed locations. The EH7 colonies appeared to share morphological features with F-isolates, but sequence analysis revealed a relationship to Bacillus endophyticus. More surprising was the EH11 bacterium, which took nearly 3 weeks to recover on R2A and formed small colonies with red pigmentation. However, sequencing could only match the isolate to the genus-level of Bacillus sp. Interestingly, at least one (and, in some cases, many) of the closest GenBank neighbors were previously identified in China, Japan, Korea, or India (see Table 1).
Fungi were recovered from 8 of the 27 locations on the flight hardware: four isolates came from F-sites, while EH and IH-sites each yielded two isolates. When the flag was placed face down on R2A, it produced two adjacent fungal colonies near its perimeter after 72 h, which were subsequently removed to allow for additional microbe recovery. However, no additional growth was observed. Nor did growth occur when the flag was transferred onto fresh R2A plates at 2, 4, 7, and 56 day time-steps. Swab-based cultures recovered in liquid media showed first signs of growth between 96 and 120 h, while cells on solid media generated a wider range of growth time, 72–552 h. On both R2A and PDA media, fungi grew rapidly and were characterized by blue/green fruiting bodies and white mycelia. Sequences submitted to GenBank identified isolates F4 and F6 (located on the leeward side of the flag) to class Eurotiomycetes, using 200 bp sequence reads. The remaining six fungal isolates were matched to the same species of Penicillium sp., whose closest neighbors in GenBank originated from China or Japan (see Table 2). The positive growth at IH locations was close to the attachment point of the flag on the housing lid, but neither IH1 nor IH2 yielded fungi. Only one non-flag associated site, EH11, produced both bacterial and fungal cultures.
4 Discussion
Our study confirmed the presence of viable microbes in the stratosphere, supporting previous reports by Imshenetsky et al. (1978), Lysenko (1980), Harris et al. (2002), Wainwright et al. (2002), Narlikar et al. (2003), Griffin (2004, 2008), and Shivaji et al. (2006). However, our samples are the first documentation of microbiota recovered from a high-altitude location directly over the Pacific Ocean. Infrared satellite imagery from METEOSAT-5 showed air with an eastward movement across the ocean during the sampling time. Independently, the closest neighbors of many bacterial and fungal samples submitted to GenBank were Chinese, Japanese, Korean, and Indian-derived isolates; primarily Bacillus sp. and B. subtilis for bacterial species and Penicillium sp. and class Eurotiomycetes for fungi. The bacterial isolates reported in this study are all spore forming species and have been collected in prior stratospheric assays, at genus-level specificity (Imshenetsky et al. 1978; Wainwright et al. 2002; Narlikar et al. 2003; Griffin 2004). Although non-spore forming eubacterial species have been recovered from the stratosphere (Griffin 2008), sporulation likely enhances resistance to high-altitude stress (Riesenman and Nicholson 2000; Nicholson 2002).
The abundance of cells recovered in this study (12 out of 27 possible flight hardware sites) was surprising based on the previously described dilution effect on cells in the stratosphere (Griffin 2007). Either our extended horizontal range and modifications to the surface of the flag actually improved the collection efficiency, or the impactor collected spores that subsequently germinated and propagated inside the housing prior to recovery back at the laboratory. The spatial correlation of positive growth areas on the hardware would suggest the possibility of post-flight growth. While the recovery of bacteria and fungi was most abundant on flag-associated regions, the presence of B. endophyticus, Bacillus sp. and Penicillium sp. on the external housing must also be considered. This area was exposed to the atmosphere when attached to the aircraft wing, possibly allowing low-altitude contamination of the surface during (1) hardware installation/removal or (2) while the aircraft was on the ground or en route to 20 km altitude. It is interesting that the major bacterial outliers reported in this study—the sole representative of B. endophyticus and the only red-pigmented species of Bacillus sp.—both came from EH locations. Therefore, the highest confidence of stratosphere-sampled isolates should be reserved strictly for microbes recovered from the flag and IH locations (Bacillus sp., B. subtilis, and Penicillium sp.) since these areas were pressure-sealed inside the housing during the brief contamination windows discussed above. Nevertheless, ground contamination cannot explain the strong DNA sequence homology of microbes recovered in this study with previously described Asian isolates located on the other side of the Pacific Ocean. Moreover, if ground contamination was a factor one might expect an even greater diversity of species recovered, including human associated microbes.
While this study has provided evidence for a long-distance, stratospheric transport of microbes across the open ocean, it is important to emphasize that it does not indicate an independent, airborne microbial ecosystem. Rather, the viable bacteria and fungi reported herein were most likely associated with temporary, trans-Pacific dust events which last 7–10 days before most particles fall out of the atmosphere. While Narlikar et al. (2003), Shivaji et al. (2006) and Wainwright et al. (2006) use the discovery of non-culturable particulates and novel species as evidence of a distinct stratosphere ecology, no mechanism has been presented to explain how microbes could remain aloft, growing or replicating. The possibility of a permanent, upper-atmosphere ecosystem seems unlikely based on several lines of evidence. First, the very low temperature of the sampling environment (−75°C) in this study was far below −20°C, the minimum temperature for microbial growth reported to date (Price and Sowers 2004; Junge et al. 2006). Although there is a temperature inversion with increasing altitude in the stratosphere (Ramaswamy et al. 2001), the extra warmth is gained due to absorption of solar radiation, including potentially biocidal UV wavelengths. Second, without a means of controlling altitude, airborne species should eventually (<5 years) fall out of the atmosphere, if aerosol extinction rates from the volcanic eruption of Mt. Pinatubo are used as a proxy (Bauman et al. 2003). Upper and lower atmosphere layers can mix according to Deshler et al. (1993), therefore how could microbes reported by Narlikar et al. (2003), Shivaji et al. (2006), and Wainwright et al. (2006) remain completely independent of terrestrial samples? The simplest way of explaining the unique stratospheric assemblages described by Narlikar et al. (2003), Shivaji et al. (2006), and Wainwright et al. (2006) is that these populations exist in terrestrial or aquatic ecosystems but have not yet been identified. However, in this study and others similar to it (Imshenetsky et al. 1978; Lysenko 1980; Harris et al. 2002; Narlikar et al. 2003; Griffin 2004, 2008), there was a strong genetic relationship between microorganisms recovered at high altitudes with those common in terrestrial or aquatic environments.
Significant improvements to the efficiency and accessibility of upper atmosphere sampling will be necessary to advance the study of high-altitude aerobiology. Hard surface impactors deployed by aircraft have demonstrated utility, but there is clearly a limit to their use. Assuming that a more robust collecting device can be engineered, special emphasis should be placed on culture-independent processing (Griffin et al. 2001; Griffin 2007) and measuring UV-induced DNA mutations (Wainwright et al. 2006). The ability to study high altitudes (up to 33 km) with sophisticated, long-duration science payloads may be available soon through ultra-long duration (up to 100 days) balloons developed by the United States Antarctic Program and NASA (Smith 2004; Gregory and Stepp 2004; National Science Foundation 2008). Measuring cells in situ (Pratt et al. 2009) for weeks, or possibly longer, could resolve the residency time question addressed throughout this study. Ultimately, such information would strengthen our notion of the biosphere—the broad range of microorganisms within it and how the upper atmosphere may have influenced the diversity and distribution of life on Earth.
References
Bauer, H., Kasper-Giebl, A., Löflund, M., Giebl, H., Hitzenberger, R., Zibuschka, F., et al. (2002). The contribution of bacteria and fungal spores to the organic carbon content of cloud water, precipitation, and aerosols. Atmospheric Research, 64, 109–119.
Bauman, J. J., Russell, P. B., Geller, M. A., & Hamill, P. (2003). A stratospheric aerosol climatology from SAGE II and CLAES measurements: 2. Results and comparisons, 1984–1999. Journal of Geophysical Research, 108(D 13), 1–30.
Brasseur, G., & Solomon, S. (1986). Aeronomy of the middle atmosphere (2nd ed.). Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Brown, J. K. M., & Hovmøller, M. S. (2002). Aerial dispersal of pathogens on the global continental scales and its impact on plant disease. Science, 297, 537–541.
Deshler, T., Johnson, B. J., & Rozier, W. R. (1993). Balloonborne measurements of Pinatubo aerosol during 1991 and 1992 at 41°N: Vertical profiles, size distribution, and volatility. Geophysical Research Letters, 20(14), 1435–1438.
Duce, R. A., Unni, C. K., Ray, B. J., Prospero, J. M., & Merrill, J. T. (1980). Long-range atmospheric transport of soil dust from Asia to the Tropical North Pacific: Temporal variability. Science, 209(4464), 1522–1524.
Grasby, S. E., Allen, C. C., Longazo, T. G., Lisle, J. T., Griffin, D. W., & Beauchamp, B. (2003). Supraglacial sulfur springs and associated biological activity in the Canadian High Arctic—Signs of life beneath the ice. Astrobiology, 3(3), 583–596.
Gregory, D. D., & Stepp, W. W. (2004). NASA’s long duration balloon program: The last ten years and the next ten years. Advances in Space Research, 33, 1608–1612.
Griffin, D. W. (2004). Terrestrial microorganisms at an altitude of 20,000 m in Earth’s atmosphere. Aerobiologia, 20, 135–140.
Griffin, D. W. (2007). Atmospheric movement of microorganisms in clouds of desert dust and implications for human health. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 20(3), 459–477.
Griffin, D. W. (2008). Non-spore forming eubacteria isolated at an altitude of 20,000 m in Earth’s atmosphere: Extended incubation periods needed for culture-based assays. Aerobiologia, 24, 19–25.
Griffin, D. W., Kellogg, C. A., & Shinn, E. A. (2001). Dust in the wind: Long range transport of dust in the atmosphere and its implications for global public and ecosystem health. Global Change & Human Health, 2(1), 20–31.
Griffin, D. W., Westphal, D. L., & Gray, M. A. (2006). Airborne microorganisms in the African desert dust corridor over the mid-Atlantic ridge, Ocean Drilling Program, Leg 209. Aerobiologia, 22, 211–226.
Hamilton, W. D., & Lenton, T. M. (1998). Spora and Gaia: How microbes fly with their clouds. Ethology Ecology & Evolution, 10, 1–16.
Harris, M. J., Wickramasinghe, N. C., Lloyd, D., Narlikar, J. V., Rajaratnam, P., Turner, M. P., et al. (2002). The detection of living cells in stratospheric samples. Proceedings of SPIE, 4495, 192–198.
Imshenetsky, A. A., Lysenko, S. V., & Kazakov, G. A. (1978). Upper boundary of the biosphere. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 35(1), 1–5.
Jaffe, D., McKendry, I., Anderson, T., & Price, H. (2003). Six ‘new’ episodes of trans-Pacific transport of air pollutants. Atmospheric Environment, 37, 391–404.
Junge, K., Eicken, H., Swanson, B. D., & Deming, J. W. (2006). Bacterial incorporation of leucine into protein down to −20°C with evidence for potential activity in sub-eutectic saline ice formations. Cryobiology, 52, 417–429.
Kar, A., & Takeuchi, K. (2004). Yellow dust: An overview of research and felt needs. Journal of Arid Environments, 59, 167–187.
Kellogg, C. A., & Griffin, D. W. (2006). Aerobiology and the global transport of desert dust. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 21(11), 638–644.
Lighthart, B. (1997). The ecology of bacteria in the alfresco atmosphere. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 23(4), 263–274.
Lysenko, S. V. (1980). Resistance of microorganisms of upper layers of the atmosphere to ultraviolet radiation and a high vacuum. Mikrobiologiia, 49(1), 175–177 (in Russian).
Lysenko, S. V., & Demina, N. S. (1992). Drying as one of the extreme factors for the microflora of the atmosphere. Journal of the British Interplanetary Society, 45, 39.
Maki, L. R., & Willoughby, K. J. (1978). Bacteria as biogenic sources of freezing nuclei. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 78, 1049–1053.
Nadkarni, M. A., Martin, F. E., Jacques, N. A., & Hunter, N. (2002). Determination of bacterial load by real-time PCR using a broad-range (universal) probe and primers set. Microbiology, 148, 257–266.
Narlikar, J. V., Lloyd, D., Wickramasinghe, N. C., Harris, M. J., Turner, M. P., Al-Mufti, S., et al. (2003). A balloon experiment to detect microorganisms in the outer space. Astrophysics and Space Science, 285(2), 555–562.
National Science Foundation (NSF), NASA Successfully Flight-Test New Balloon Over Antarctica. 26 January 2008. http://www.nsf.gov/news/news_summ.jsp?cntn_id=112956&org=NSF&from=news
Nicholson, W. L. (2002). Roles of Bacillus endospores in the environment. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 59, 410–416.
Nicholson, W. L., Munakata, N., Horneck, G., Melosh, H. J., & Setlow, P. (2000). Resistance of Bacillus endospores to extreme terrestrial and extraterrestrial environments. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 64(3), 548–572.
Pratt, K. A., DeMott, P. J., French, J. F., Wang, Z., Westphal, D. L., Heymsfield, A. J., et al. (2009). In-situ detection of biological particles in cloud ice-crystals. Nature Geoscience. doi:10.1038/NGEO521. Published online 17 May 2009.
Prenni, A. J., Petters, M. D., Kreidenweis, S. M., Heald, C. L., Martin, S. T., Artaxo, P., et al. (2009). Relative roles of biogenic emissions and Saharan dust as ice nuclei in the Amazon basin. Nature Geosciences. doi:10.1038/NGEO517. Published online 3 May 2009.
Price, P. B., & Sowers, T. (2004). Temperature dependence of metabolic rates for microbial growth, maintenance, and survival. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101(13), 4631–4636.
Ramaswamy, V., Chanin, M.-L., Angell, J., Barnett, J., Gaffen, D., Gelman, M., et al. (2001). Stratospheric temperature trends: Observations and model simulations. Reviews of Geophysics, 39(1), 71–122.
Riesenman, P. J., & Nicholson, W. L. (2000). Role of the spore coat layers in Bacillus subtilis spore resistance to hydrogen peroxide, artificial UV-C, UV-B, and solar UV radiation. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 66(2), 620–626.
Sattler, B., Puxbaum, H., & Psenner, R. (2001). Bacterial growth in supercooled cloud droplets. Geophysical Research Letters, 28(2), 239–242.
Schnell, R. C., & Vali, G. (1976). Biogenic ice nuclei: Part I. Terrestrial and marine sources. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 33, 1554–1564.
Shivaji, S., Chaturvedi, P., Suresh, K., Reddy, G. S. N., Dutt, C. B. S., Wainwright, M., et al. (2006). Bacillus aerius sp. nov., Bacillus aerophilus sp. nov., Bacillus stratosphericus sp. nov. and Bacillus altitudinis sp. nov., isolated from cryogenic tubes used for collecting air samples from high altitudes. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 56, 1465–1473.
Smith, I. S., Jr. (2004). The NASA Balloon Program: Looking to the future. Advances in Space Research, 33, 1588–1593.
Sun, J., & Ariya, P. A. (2006). Atmospheric organic and bio-aerosols as cloud condensation nuclei (CCN): A review. Atmospheric Environment, 40, 795–820.
Szyrmer, W., & Zawadzki, I. (1997). Biogenic and anthropogenic sources of ice-forming nuclei: A review. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 78(2), 209–228.
Wainwright, M., Alharbi, S., & Wickramasinghe, N. C. (2006). How do microorganisms reach the stratosphere? International Journal of Astrobiology, 5(1), 13–15.
Wainwright, M., Wickramasinghe, N. C., Narlikar, J. V., & Rajaratnam, P. (2002). Microorganisms culture from stratospheric air samples obtained at 41 km. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 10778, 1–5.
White, T. J., Bruns, T. D., Lee, S. B., & Taylor, J. W. (1990). Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In M. A. Innis, D. H. Gelfand, J. J. Sninsky, & T. J. White (Eds.), PCR protocols: A guide to methods and applications (pp. 315–322). London: Academic Press.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Science Foundation Integrative Graduate Education and Research Traineeship (IGERT) program at the University of Washington Graduate Program in Astrobiology, and the NASA Academy at Ames Research Center. Critical resources came from NASA Johnson Space Center, NASA Kennedy Space Center, NASA Dryden Flight Research Center, United States Geological Survey (USGS), Lockheed Martin Corporation and the University of Florida. The authors are grateful to Jack Warren, Ron Bastien, and Mike Zolensky of the NASA Cosmic Dust Program for providing the flight hardware and Dennis Gearhart and Mike Kapitzke for coordinating the flight operations at Dryden. Special thanks is owed to the NASA Academy Staff (Doug O’Handley, Kathleen Hinds, Steve Mitchell, and Yvonne Torres) and 2007 Research Associates (Brandon Suarez, Erin Mulholland, Graham Lau, Jennifer Kissinger, Robert Haynes, Julia Ling, Jason Carroll, Jon Mihaly, Cameron Haag, Rick Conrey, Michael Kru, and Marc Silicani) who played a crucial role in coordinating this study. Atmospheric weather models were generated with the help of Doug Westphal (Naval Research Laboratory), Dave Dempsey (San Francisco State University), and Marion Legg (NASA Ames).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Smith, D.J., Griffin, D.W. & Schuerger, A.C. Stratospheric microbiology at 20 km over the Pacific Ocean. Aerobiologia 26, 35–46 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10453-009-9141-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10453-009-9141-7