Abstract
This study examined the predictors of carbon emissions in member countries of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). Panel models robust to cross-sectional dependence and slope heterogeneity were used for the study. From the heterogeneity and cross-sectional dependence tests, the studied panel was heterogeneous and cross-sectionally dependent. Also, the unit root and cointegration tests established the series to be first differenced stationary and cointegrated in the long run. Additionally, results of the CCEMG regression estimator in the whole panel affirmed economic growth (GDP) to be a significantly positive predictor of CO2 emissions, while foreign direct investments (FDI) and population growth (POP) were trivial determinants of CO2 emissions. The discoveries were however diverse in the individual countries. Finally, there was no causality between GDP and CO2 emissions and between POP and CO2 emissions. However, there was a one-way causality from CO2 emissions to FDI. Policy recommendations are further discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Find the latest articles, discoveries, and news in related topics.Abbreviations
- GDP:
-
economic growth
- POP:
-
population
- FDI:
-
foreign direct investments
- CO2 emissions:
-
carbon emissions
- NRE:
-
non-renewable energy
- EC:
-
energy consumption
- NAFTA:
-
North American Free Trade Agreement
- PCA:
-
principal components analysis
- CADF:
-
cross-sectionally augmented Dickey-Fuller
- CIPS:
-
cross-sectional Im, Pesaran and Shin
- CD:
-
cross-sectional dependence
- LM:
-
Lagrangian multiplier
- VIF:
-
variance inflation factor
References
Acar M (2016) Economic growth impact of foreign direct investment: the case of Turkey. Kastamonu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 13:92–105
Acharyya J (2009) FDI, growth and environment: evidence from India on CO2 emission during the last two decades. J Econ Dev 34(1):43–58
Adamu TM, Haq I, Shafiq M (2019) Analyzing the impact of energy, export variety, and FDI on environmental degradation in the context of environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: a case study of India. Energies 12:1076. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12061076
Ahmad N, Du L (2017) Effects of energy production and CO2 emissions on economic growth in Iran: ARDL approach. Energy 123:521–537
Ahmad M, Zhao Z-Y, Rehman A, Shahzad M, Li H (2019) Revealing long-and short-run empirical interactions among foreign direct investment, renewable power generation, and CO2 emissions in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 26:22220–22245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05543-x
Ahmad M, Khattak SI, Khan A, Rahman ZU (2020) Innovation, foreign direct investment (FDI), and the energy– pollution–growth nexus in OECD region: a simultaneous equation modeling approach. Environ Ecol Stat. 27:203–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-020-00442-8
Alagöz M, Erdoğan S, Topallı N (2008) Foreign direct investment and economic growth: evidence from Turkey 1992-2007. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 7(1):79–89
Ali W, Abdullaha A, Azam M (2017) Re-visiting the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for Malaysia: fresh evidence from ARDL bounds testing approach. Renew Sust Energ Rev 77:990–1000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.236
Ali M, Raza SA, Khamis B (2020) Environmental degradation, economic growth, and energy innovation: evidence from European countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 27:28306–28315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09142-z
Alvaradoa R, Poncea P, Alvaradoa R, Ponceb K, Huachizacaa V, Toledoc E (2019) Sustainable and non-sustainable energy and output in Latin America: a cointegration and causality approach with panel data. Energy Strat Rev 26:100369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2019.100369
Antonakakisa N, Chatziantoniou I, Filis G (2017) Energy consumption, CO2 emissions, and economic growth: an ethical dilemma. Renew Sust Energ Rev 68:808–824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.105
Aziz A, Makkawi B (2012) Relationship between foreign direct investment and country population. Int J Bus Manag 7(8):63–70. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v7n8p63
Balgati BH (2002) Recent developments in the econometrics of panel data (Vol. I and II). Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham
Balgati BH (2004) Panel data: theory and application. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg
Bekhet HA, Matar A, Yasmin T (2017) CO2 emissions, energy consumption, economic growth, and financial development in GCC countries: dynamic simultaneous equation models. Renew Sust Energ Rev 70:117–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.089
Bekun FV, Alola AA, Sarkodie SA (2019) Toward a sustainable environment: nexus between CO2 emissions, resource rent, renewable and nonrenewable energy in 16-EU countries. Sci Total Environ 657:1023–1029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.104
Bond S, Eberhardt M (2013) Accounting for unobserved heterogeneity in panel time series models. Nuffield College, University of Oxford, Mimeo
Burfisher ME, Robinson S, Thierfelder K (2001) The impact of NAFTA on the United States. J Econ Pers 15(1):125–144. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.15.1.125
Caliendo L, Parro F (2015) Estimates of the trade and welfare effects of NAFTA. Rev Econ Stud 82(1):1–44. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdu035
Chandran VGR, Tang CF (2013) The impacts of transport energy consumption, foreign direct investment and income on CO2 emissions in ASEAN-5 economies. Renew Sust Energ Rev 24:445–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.03.054
Cheng C, Ren X, Wang Z, Yan C (2019) Heterogeneous impacts of renewable energy and environmental patents on CO2 emission-evidence from the BRIICS. Sci Total Environ 668:1328–1338
Cherni A, Jouini SE (2017) An ARDL approach to the CO2 emissions, renewable energy and economic growth nexus: Tunisian evidence. Int J Hydro Energ 42:29056–29066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.08.072
Cherniwchan J (2017) Trade liberation and the environment: evidence from NAFTA and U.S. manufacturing. J Int Econ 105:130–149
Chudik A, Pesaran MH (2013a) Common correlated effects estimation of heterogeneous dynamic panel data models with weakly exogenous regressors. J Econ 188(2): 393–420
Chudik A, Pesaran MH (2013b) Econometric analysis of high dimensional VARs featuring a dominant unit. Econ Rev 32:592–649
Danish, Baloch MA, Suad S (2018) Modeling the impact of transport energy consumption on CO2 emission in Pakistan: evidence from ARDL approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 25:9461–9473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1230-0
Dar JA, Asif M (2018) Does financial development improve environmental quality in Turkey? An application of endogenous structural breaks based cointegration approach. Manag Environ Qual Int J. 29(19):368–384. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-02-2017-0021
Demena BA, Afesorgbor SK (2020) The effect of FDI on environmental emissions: evidence from a meta-analysis. Energy Policy 138:111192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111192
Dhrifi A, Jaziri R, Alnahdi S (2020) Does foreign direct investment and environmental degradation matter for poverty? Evidence from developing countries. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 52:13–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2019.09.008
Dong K, Sun R, Dong X (2018) CO2 emissions, natural gas and renewables, economic growth: assessing the evidence from China. Sci Total Environ 640:293–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.322
Dou J, Han X (2019) How does the industry mobility affect pollution industry transfer in China: empirical test on pollution haven hypothesis and porter hypothesis. J Clean Prod 217:105–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.147
Dumitrescu EI, Hurlin C (2012) Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Econ Model 29:1450–1460
Erdogan S, Yıldırım S, Yıldırım DÇ, Gedikli A (2020) The effects of innovation on sectoral carbon emissions: evidence from G20 countries. J Environ Manag 267:110637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110637
Esso LJ, Keho Y (2016) Energy consumption, economic growth and carbon emissions: cointegration and causality evidence from selected African countries. Energy 114:492–497
Falki N (2009) Impact of foreign direct investment on economic growth in Pakistan. Int Rev Bus Res Papers 5(5):110–120
Ferrier GD, Reyes J, Zhu Z (2016) Technology diffusion on the international trade network. J Pub Econ Theory 18(2):291–312
Ghosh S (2009) Import demand of crude oil and economic growth: evidence from India. Energy Policy 37(2):699–702
Gökmenoğlu K, Taspinar N (2015) The relationship between Co2 emissions, energy consumption, economic growth and FDI: the case of Turkey. J Int Trade Econ Dev 25(5):706–723. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2015.1119876
Gujarati DN, Porter DC (2009) Econometric modeling: model specification and diagnostic testing, 5th edn. McGraw-Hill Irwin, New York
Guzel AE, Okumus İ (2020) Revisiting the pollution haven hypothesis in ASEAN-5 countries: new insights from panel data analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 27:18157–18167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08317-y
Haider ZSA, Zafar MW, Shahbaz M, Hou F (2019) Dynamic linkages between globalization, financial development and carbon emissions: evidence from Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation countries. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.210
Hanif I (2018) Impact of fossil fuels energy consumption, energy policies, and urban sprawl on carbon emissions in East Asia and the Pacific: a panel investigation. Energy Strat Rev 21:16–24
Hanif I, Gago-de-Santos P (2017) The importance of population control and macro-economic stability to reducing environmental degradation: an empirical test of the environmental Kuznets curve for developing countries. Environ Dev 23:1–9
Hanif I, Raza SMF, Santos PG, Qaiser A (2019) Fossil fuels, foreign direct investment, and economic growth have triggered CO2 emissions in emerging Asian economies: some empirical evidence. Energy 171:493–501
Hsiao C, Mountain DC, Ho-Illman K (1995) Bayesian integration of end-use metering and conditional demand analysis. J Bus Econ Stat 13:315–326
Inglesi-Lotz R, Dogan E (2018) The role of renewable versus non-renewable energy to the level of CO2 emissions a panel analysis of sub-Saharan Africa’s Βig 10 electricity generators. Renew Energy 123:36–43
Ito K (2017) CO2 emissions, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption, and economic growth: evidence from panel data for developing countries. Int Econ 151:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inteco.2017.02.001
Jardón A, Kuik O, Tol RSJ (2017) Economic growth and carbon dioxide emissions: An analysis of Latin America and the Caribbean. Atmosfera 30:87–100
Jian J, Fan X, He P, Xiong H, Shen H (2019) The effects of energy consumption, economic growth and financial development on CO2 emissions in China: a VECM approach. Sustainability 11:4850. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11184850
Jun W, Zakaria M, Shahzad SJH, Mahmood H (2018) Effect of FDI on pollution in China: new insights based on wavelet approach. Sustainability 10:3859. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10113859
Kahveci Ş, Terzi H (2017) Causality analysis of the relationship between foreign direct investment and economic growth in Turkey. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 49(1):135–154
Karasoy A, Akçay S (2019) Effects of renewable energy consumption and trade on environmental pollution: the Turkish case. Manag Environ Qual Int J 30:437–455
Kivyiro P, Arminen H (2014) Carbon dioxide emissions, energy consumption, economic growth and foreign direct investment: Causality analysis for sub-Saharan Africa. Energy 74:595–606
Knapp T, Mookerjee R (1996) Population growth and global CO2 emissions. A secular perspective. Energy Policy 24(1):31–37
Koengkan M (2018) The decline of environmental degradation by renewable energy consumption in the MERCOSUR countries: an approach with ARDL modeling. Environ Syst Dec 38:415–425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-018-9671-z
Koyuncu TF (2017) Relationship between foreign direct investment, economic growth and employment: application of Turkey (1990-2015). Uluslararası Sosyal ve Ekonomik Bilimler Dergisi 2:62–69
Lau L-S, Choong C-K, Eng Y-K (2014) Investigation of the environmental Kuznets curve for carbon emissions in Malaysia: do foreign direct investment and trade matter? Energy Policy 68:490–497
Lee WJ (2013) The contribution of foreign direct investment to clean energy use, carbon emissions and economic growth. Energy Policy 55:483–489
Lee S, Oh DW (2015) Economic growth and the environment in China: empirical evidence using prefecture- level data. China Econ Rev 36:73–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2015.08.009
Li K, Musah M, Yusheng K, Mensah IA, Stephen KA, Bawuah J, Mary D, Cephas PKC, Agyemang AO (2020) Liquidity and firms’ financial performance nexus: panel evidence from non-financial firms listed on the Ghana Stock Exchange. SAGE Open 10(3):215824402095036
Liobikiene G, Butkus M (2018) The challenges and opportunities of climate change policy under different stages of economic development. Sci Total Environ 642:999–1007
Liu Y (2009) Exploring the relationship between urbanization and energy consumption in China using ARDL (autoregressive distributed lag) and FDM (factor decomposition model). Energy 34:1846–1854
Mahmood H, Chaudhary AR (2012) FDI, population density and carbon dioxide emissions: a case study of Pakistan. Iranica J Energy Environ 3(4):354–360. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.ijee.2012.03.04.10
Mahmooda H, Alkhateeba TTY, Al-Qahtanic MMZ, Allama Z, Ahmadd N, Furqane M (2020) Energy consumption, economic growth and pollution in Saudi Arabia. Manag Sci Let 10:979–984
Mensah IA, Sun M, Gao C, Omar-Sasu AY, Zhu D, Ampimah BC, Quarcoo A (2019) Analysis on the nexus of economic growth, fossil fuel energy consumption, CO2 emissions and oil price in Africa based on a PMG panel ARDL approach. J Clean Prod 228:161–174
Mert M, Bölük G, Çağlar AE (2019) Interrelationships among foreign direct investments, renewable energy, and CO2 emissions for different European country groups: a panel ARDL approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 26:21495–21510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05415-4
Mirza FM, Kanwal A (2017) Energy consumption, carbon emissions and economic growth in Pakistan: dynamic causality analysis. Renew Sust Energ Rev 72:1233–1240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.10.081
Musah M, Kong Y, Mensah IA, Stephen KA, Mary D (2020) The link between carbon emissions, renewable energy consumption, and economic growth: a heterogeneous panel evidence from West Africa. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 27:28867–28889. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08488-8
Nkengfack H, Kaffo FH (2019) Energy consumption, economic growth and carbon emissions: evidence from the top three emitters in Africa. Mod Econ 10:52–71. https://doi.org/10.4236/me.2019.101004
Omri A, Nguyen DK, Rault C (2014) Causal interactions between CO2 emissions, FDI, and economic growth: evidence from dynamic simultaneous-equation models. Econ Model 42:382–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2014.07.026
Ozturk I, Acaravci A (2010) CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in Turkey. Renew Sust Energ Rev 14:3220–3225
Paramati SR, Apergis N, Ummalla M (2018) Dynamics of renewable energy consumption and economic activities across the agriculture, industry, and service sectors: evidence in the perspective of sustainable development. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:1375–1387
Pesaran MH (2006) Estimation and inference in large heterogenous panels with multifactor error structure. Econometrica 74:967–1012
Pesaran MH, Yamaga T (2008) Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. J Econ 142(1):50–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.010
Pineiro Chousa J, Tamazian A, Vadlamannati KC (2017) Does higher economic and financial development lead to environmental degradation: evidence from BRIC countries. Energy Policy 37(1):246–253
Rafindadi AA, Muye IM, Kaita RA (2018) The effects of FDI and energy consumption on environmental pollution in predominantly resource-based economies of GCC. Sust Energy Technol Assess 25:126–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2017.12.008
Rahman ZU, Cai H, Khattak SI, Hasan MM (2019a) Energy production-income-carbon emissions nexus in the perspective of NAFTA and BRIC nations: a dynamic panel data approach. Econ Res Ekonomska Istraživanja 32(1):3378–3391. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2019.1660201
Rahman ZU, Chongbo W, Ahmad M (2019b) An (a) symmetric analysis of the pollution haven hypothesis in the context of Pakistan: a non-linear approach. Carbon Manag. 10:227–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2019.1577179
Ren S, Yuan B, Ma X, Chen X (2014) International trade, FDI (foreign direct investment) and embodied CO2 emissions: a case study of Chinas industrial sectors. China Econ Rev 28:123–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2014.01.003
Saboori B, Sulaiman J (2013) CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) countries: a co-integration approach. Energy 55:813–822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.04.038
Salehnia N, Alavijeh NK, Salehnia N (2020) Testing porter and pollution haven hypothesis via economic variables and CO2 emissions: a cross-country review with panel quantile regression method. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 27:31527–31542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09302-1
Samal A (2018) An empirical analysis of asymmetry and threshold effect of intergovernmental grants in India: a panel data analysis. Global Bus Rev http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0972150918761083
Saqib D, Masnoon M, Rafique N (2013) Impact of foreign direct investment on economic growth of Pakistan. Adv Manag Appl Econ 3(1):35–45. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2207626. Accessed 5 March 2020
Seker F, Ertugrul HM, Cetin M (2015) The impact of foreign direct investment on environmental quality: a bounds testing and causality analysis for Turkey. Renew Sust Energ Rev 52:347–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.118
Shahbaz M, Feridun M (2011) Electricity consumption and economic growth: empirical evidence from Pakistan. Qual Quant 46(5):1583–1599
Shahbaz M, Tiwari AK, Nasir M (2013) The effects of financial development, eco- nomic growth, coal consumption and trade openness on CO2 emissions in South Africa. Energy Policy 61:1452–1459
Shahbaz M, Mahalik MK, Shah SH, Sato JR (2016) Time-varying analysis of CO2 emissions, energy consumption, and economic growth nexus: Statistical experience in next 11 countries. Energy Policy 98:33–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.08.011
Shahbaz M, Raghutla C, Song M, Zameer H, Jiao Z (2020) Public-private partnerships investment in energy as new determinant of CO2 emissions: the role of technological innovations in China. Energy Econ 86:104664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104664
Shi A (2003) The impact of population pressure on global carbon dioxide emissions. Ecol Econ 44:29–42
Shoaib HM, Rafique MZ, Nadeem AM, Huang S (2020) Impact of financial development on CO2 emissions: a comparative analysis of developing countries (D8) and developed countries (G8). Environ Sci Pollut Res. 27:12461–12475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06680-z
Shuai C, Shen L, Jiao L, Wu Y, Tan Y (2017) Identifying key impact factors on carbon emission: evidences from panel and time-series data of 125 countries from 1990 to 2011. Appl Energy 187:310–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.11.029
Smarzynska BK, Wei SJ (2001) Pollution havens and foreign direct investment: dirty secret or popular myth? Cont Econ Anal Pol 3(2). https://doi.org/10.2202/1538-0645.1244
Solarin AA, Al-Mulali U (2018) Influence of foreign direct investment on indicators of environmental degradation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:24845–24859. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2562-5
Soytas U, Sari R, Ewing BT (2007) Energy consumption, income and carbon emissions in the United States. Ecol Econ 62:482–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.07.009
Sulaiman C, Abdul-Rahim AS (2018) Population growth and CO2 emission in Nigeria: a recursive ARDL approach. SAGE Open 8:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018765916
Sun H, Aminatou KP, Mensah IA, Liang L, Mohsin M (2020) The role of environmental entrepreneurship for sustainable development: evidence from 35 countries in Sub-Saharan Africa. Sci Tot Env 741:140132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140132
Sung B, Song W-Y, Park S-D (2018) How foreign direct investment affects CO2 emission levels in the Chinese manufacturing industry: evidence from panel data. Econ Syst 42(2):320–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2017.06.002
Tachie AK, Xingle L, Dauda L, Mensah CN, Appiah-Twum F, Adjei Mensah I (2020) The influence of trade openness on environmental pollution in EU-18 countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 27(28):35535–35555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09718-9
Talukdar D, Meisner CM (2001) Does the private sector help or hurt the environment? Evidence from carbon dioxide pollution in developing countries. World Dev 29:827–840
Tamazian A, Chousa JP, Vadlamannati KC (2009) Does higher economic and financial development lead to environmental degradation: evidence from BRIC countries. Energy Policy 37:246–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.08.025
Tang CF, Tan BW (2015) The impact of energy consumption, income and foreign direct investment on carbon dioxide emissions in Vietnam. Energy 79:447–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.11.033
Tutulmaz O (2015) Environmental Kuznets Curve time series application for Turkey: Why controversial results exist for similar models? Renew Sust Energ Rev 50:73–81
Wang Z, Yin F, Zhang Y, Zhang X (2012) An empirical research on the influencing factors of regional CO2 emissions: evidence from Beijing city, China. Appl Energy 100:277–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.05.038
Wang P, Wu W, Zhu B, Wei Y (2013) Examining the impact factors of energy-related CO2 emissions using the STIRPAT model in Guangdong Province, China. Appl Energy 106:65–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.01.036
World Bank (2017) World development indicators. http://databank.worldbank.org/data/reports.aspx?source=World%20Development%20Indicators. Accessed 25 Feb 2020
World Bank (2019) World development indicators. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators. Accessed 28 Jan 2020
York R (2007) Demographic trends and energy consumption in European Union Nations 1960-2025. Soc Sci Res 36(3):855–872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2006.06.007
Zhang Y-J (2011) The impcat of financial growth on carbon emissions: an empirical analysis in China. Energy Policy 39(4):2197–2203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.02.026
Zhang C, Zhou X (2016) Does foreign direct investment lead to lower CO2 emissions? Evidence from a regional analysis in China. Renew Sust Energ Rev 58:943–951
Zhou Y, Fu J, Kong Y, Wu R (2018) How foreign direct investment influences carbon emissions, based on the empirical analysis of Chinese urban data. Sustainability 10(7):1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072163
Zhu H, Duan L, Guo Y, Yu K (2016) The effects of FDI, economic growth and energy consumption on carbon emissions in ASEAN-5: evidence from panel quantile regression. Econ Model 58:237–248
Funding
This study was funded by the Nature Fund 2020 (Project Approval Number: 71973054)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Musah, M., Kong, Y. & Vo, X.V. Predictors of carbon emissions: an empirical evidence from NAFTA countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 11205–11223 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11197-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11197-x