Abstract
This work systematically examines the empirical interactions among foreign direct investment (FDI), renewable power generation (RPG), hydropower generation (HPG), non-hydropower generation (NHPG), and CO2 emissions in the long run and short run. To test the existence of long-run equilibrium association among those variables, Bayer-Hanck combined cointegration and autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) model have been employed on time series of China for the period 1991–2017. The vector error correction model-based short-run impacts among the variables of interest are also estimated. Besides, Toda-Yamamoto causality and Granger causality are employed to confirm the direction of causal links. The existence of a long-run equilibrium relationship is revealed in case of all types of specification. The expansion of both FDI and CO2 emissions boosted RPG, HPG, and NHPG in the short run and long run, with greater intensity of impacts in the long run. To reflect comparisons, it is found that the renewables generation driving the impact of CO2 emissions and FDI on NHPG is greater than RPG, which further exceeds HPG. In turn, the RPG, HPG, and NHPG mitigated CO2 emissions both in the long run and short run, with stronger impacts in the long run. Moreover, the CO2 emissions inhibition impact of HPG dominated NHPG, which further exceeded that of RPG. The FDI boosted CO2 emissions in a way that the long-run pollution haven impact is revealed to be powerful than that of the short run. A unidirectional causality has been observed running from FDI to CO2 emissions, RPG, HPG, and NHPG. A bidirectional causality is found operative between CO2 emissions and RPG/HPG/NHPG. Interestingly, the long-run and short-run impacts remained homogeneous in terms of directionality. Nevertheless, strict heterogeneity is observed in terms of the degree of impacts. Based on empirics, both long-term and short-term policies on FDI, renewables generation, and CO2 emissions are vital for decision-makers in China.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Notes
Terawatt-hours
Million tons
It states that the correlated series move in the same direction i.e. either decrease or increase.
cumulative sum of recursive residuals
Log Likelihood Ratio
Abbreviations
- FDI:
-
Foreign direct investment
- RPG:
-
Renewable power generation
- HPG:
-
Hydropower generation
- NHPG:
-
Non-hydropower generation
- Type-R:
-
Specifications with RPG
- Type-H:
-
Specifications with HPG
- Type-N:
-
Specifications with NHPG
- τ:
-
Kendall’s coefficient
- CC:
-
Pearson’s coefficient
- ρ :
-
Spearman’s coefficient
- ARDL:
-
Autoregressive distributed lag
- VECM:
-
Vector error correction model
- VAR:
-
Vector autoregressive
- GLS:
-
Generalized Least Squares
- PP:
-
Phillips-Perron
- KPSS:
-
Kwiatkowski Phillips Schmidt and Shin
- RESET:
-
Regression equation specification error test
- ARCH:
-
Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity
- LM:
-
Lagrange multiplier
- CUSUM:
-
Cumulative sum of recursive residuals
- STIRPAT:
-
Stochastic Impacts by Regression on Population, Affluence and Technology
References
Ahmad M, Zhao ZY, Li H (2019a) Revealing stylized empirical interactions among construction sector, urbanization, energy consumption,economic growth and CO2 emissions in China. Sci Total Environ 657:1085–1098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.112
Ahmad M, Zhao ZY, Irfan M, Mukeshimana MC (2019b) Empirics on influencing mechanisms among energy, finance, trade, environment, and economic growth: a heterogeneous dynamic panel data analysis of China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(14):14148–14170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04673-6
Baek J (2016) Do nuclear and renewable energy improve the environment? Empirical evidence from the United States. Ecol Indic 66:352–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.01.059
Balibey M (2015) Relationships among CO2 emissions, economic growth and foreign direct investment and the environmental kuznets curve hypothesis in Turkey. Int J Energy Econ Policy 5(4):1042–1049
Banerjee A, Dolado J, Mestre R (1998) Error-correction mechanism tests for cointegration in a single-equation framework. J Time Ser Anal 19(3):267–283
Bayer C, Hanck C (2013) Combining non-cointegration tests. J Time Ser Anal 34(1):83–95
Bekun FV, Alola AA, Sarkodie SA (2019) Toward a sustainable environment: nexus between CO2 emissions, resource rent, renewable and nonrenewable energy in 16-EU countries. Sci Total Environ 657:1023–1029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.104
Bilgili F, Kocak E, Bulut U (2016) The dynamic impact of renewable energy consumption on CO2 emissions: a revisited environmental kuznets curve approach. Renew Sust Energ Rev 54:838–845
Blanco L, Gonzalez F, Ruiz I (2013) The impact of FDI on CO2 emissions in Latin America. Oxf Dev Stud 41(1):104–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600818.2012.732055
Boswijk HP (1994) Testing for an unstable root in conditional and structural error correction models. J Econ 63(1):37–60
BP (2018) BP Statistical Review on World Energy. https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/businesssites/en/global/corporate/pdfs/energy-economics/statistical-review/bp-stats-review-2018-full-report.pdf. Accessed 23 Oct 2018
Buckley PJ, Casson M (2016) The future of the multinational enterprise. Springer, New York, USA
Chen Y (2018) Factors influencing renewable energy consumption in China: an empirical analysis based on provincial panel data. J Clean Prod 174:605–615
Danish, Bin Zhang, Bo Wang, Zhaohua Wang (2017) “Role of Renewable Energy and Non-Renewable Energy Consumption on EKC : Evidence from Pakistan.” Journal of Cleaner Production 156:855–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.203
Davidson R, MacKinnon JG (2004) Econometric theory and methods. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 623–624
Dicky DA, Fuller WA (1979) Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. J Am Stat Assoc 74(366):427–431
Dietz T, Rosa EA (1994) Rethinking the environmental impacts of population, affluence and technology. Hum Ecolo Rev 1:277–300
Dietz T, Rosa EA (1997) Effects of population and affluence on CO2 emissions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94:175–179
Dogan E, Ozturk I (2017) The influence of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and real income on CO2 emissions in the USA: evidence from structural break tests. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 24(11):10846–10854. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-8786-y
Dogan E, Seker F (2016) The influence of real output, renewable and non-renewable energy, trade and financial development on carbon emissions in the top renewable energy countries. Renew Sust Energ Rev 60:1074–1085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.02.006
Dong K, Sun R, Hochman G (2017) Do natural gas and renewable energy consumption lead to less CO2 emission? Empirical evidence from a panel of BRICS countries. Energy 141:1466–1478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.11.092
Dong K, Hochman G, Zhang Y, Sun R, Li H, Liao H (2018) CO2 emissions, economic and population growth, and renewable energy: empirical evidence across regions. Energy Econ 75:180–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.08.017
Doytch N, Narayan S (2016) Does FDI influence renewable energy consumption? An analysis of sectoral FDI impact on renewable and non-renewable industrial energy consumption. Energy Econ 54:291–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.12.010
Elliott, G., Rothenberg, T.J. and Stock, J.H., 1992. Efficient tests for an autoregressive unit root
Engle RF, Grager CW (1987) Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica 55(2):251–276
Ferrier GD, Reyes J, Zhu Z (2016) Technology diffusion on the international trade network. J Public Econ Theory 18(2):291–312
Fisher R (1932) Statistical methods for research workers. Oliver and Boyd, London
Gökmenoğlu K, Taspinar N (2015) The relationship between Co2emissions, energy consumption, economic growth and FDI: the case of Turkey. J Int Trade Econ Dev 25(5):706–723. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2015.1119876
Gorus MS, Aydin M (2019) The relationship between energy consumption, economic growth, and CO2 emission in MENA countries: causality analysis in the frequency domain. Energy 168:815–822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.11.139
Granger CWJ (1969) Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross spectral methods. Econometrica 37:424–438
Hanif I, Faraz Raza SM, Gago-de-Santos P, Abbas Q (2019) Fossil fuels, foreign direct investment, and economic growth have triggered CO2 emissions in emerging Asian economies: some empirical evidence. Energy 171:493–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.01.011
Inglesi-Lotz R, Dogan E (2018) The role of renewable versus non-renewable energy to the level of CO2 emissions a panel analysis of sub- Saharan Africa’s Βig 10 electricity generators. Renew Energy 123:36–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.02.041
Irandoust M (2016) The renewable energy-growth nexus with carbon emissions and technological innovation: evidence from the Nordic countries. Ecol Indic 69:118–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.03.051
Johansen S (1988) “STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF COINTEGRATION VECTORS.” J Econ Dyn Control 12:231–54
Kahouli B (2018) The causality link between energy electricity consumption, CO2 emissions, R&D stocks and economic growth in Mediterranean countries (MCs). Energy 145:388–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.12.136
Keho Y (2016) Trade openness and the impact of foreign direct investment on CO2 emissions: econometric evidence from ECOWAS countries. J Econ Sustain Dev 18(7):151–157
Kendall M (1938) A new measure of rank correlation. Biometrika 30(12):81–89
Khandker LL, Amin SB, Khan F (2018) Renewable energy consumption and foreign direct investment: reports from Bangladesh. J Acc Fin Econ 8(3):72–87
Kılıçarslan Z, Dumrul Y (2017) Foreign direct investments and CO2 emissions relationship: the case of Turkey. Bus Econ Res J 8(4):647–660. https://doi.org/10.20409/berj.2017.73
Koçak E, Şarkgüneşi A (2018) The impact of foreign direct investment on CO2 emissions in Turkey: new evidence from cointegration and bootstrap causality analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 25(1):790–804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0468-2
Kwiatkowski D, Phillips PC, Schmidt P, Shin Y (1992) Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: how sure are we that economic time series have a unit root. J Econ 54(1–3):159–178
Lee JW (2013) The contribution of foreign direct investment to clean energy use, carbon emissions and economic growth. Energy Policy 55:483–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.12.039
Mavikela N, Khobai H (2018) Investigating the link between foreign direct investment, energy consumption and economic growth in Argentina. Munich Personal RePEc Archive, No. 83960. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/83960/
McNown R, Sam CY, Goh, SK (2018) Bootstrapping the autoregressive distributed lag test for cointegration. Applied Economics, 50(13):1509–1521
Mert M, Boluk G (2016) Do foreign direct investment and renewable energy consumption affect the CO2 emissions? New evidence from a panel ARDL approach to Kyoto annex countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 23(21):21669–21681. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-7413-7
Omri A, Nguyen DK (2014) On the determinants of renewable energy consumption: international evidence. Energy 72:554–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.05.081
Omri A, Nguyen DK, Rault C (2014) Causal interactions between CO2 emissions, FDI, and economic growth: evidence from dynamic simultaneous-equation models. Econ Model 42:382–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2014.07.026
Pata UK (2018) Renewable energy consumption, urbanization, financial development, income and CO2 emissions in Turkey: testing EKC hypothesis with structural breaks. J Clean Prod 187:770–779
Peng H, Tan X, Li Y, Hu L (2016) Economic growth, foreign direct investment and CO2 emissions in China: a panel Granger causality analysis. Sustainability 8(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su8030233
Pesaran MH, Shin Y, Smith RJ (2001) Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. J Appl Econ 16:289–326
Phillips PC, Perron P (1988) Testing for a unit root for time series regression. Biometrika 75(2):335–346
REN21 (2018) Renewables 2018 global status report. http://www.ren21.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/17-8652_GSR2018_FullReport_web_-1.pdf. Accessed 11 Nov 2018
Sarkodie SA, Strezov V (2018) Assessment of contribution of Australia’s energy production to CO2 emissions and environmental degradation using statistical dynamic approach. Sci Total Environ 639:888–899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.204
Sarkodie SA, Strezov V (2019) Effect of foreign direct investments, economic development and energy consumption on greenhouse gas emissions in developing countries. Sci Total Environ 646:862–871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.365
Sbia R, Shahbaz M, Hamdi H (2014) A contribution of foreign direct investment, clean energy, trade openness, carbon emissions and economic growth to energy demand in UAE. Econ Model 36:191–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2013.09.047
Shahbaz M, Nasir MA, Roubaud D (2018) Environmental degradation in France: the effects of FDI, financial development, and energy innovations. Energy Econ 74:843–857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.07.020
Solarin SA, Al-Mulali U, Musah I, Ozturk I (2017) Investigating the pollution haven hypothesis in Ghana: an empirical investigation. Energy 124:706–719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.02.089
Sung B, Song W-Y, Park S-D (2018) How foreign direct investment affects CO2 emission levels in the Chinese manufacturing industry: evidence from panel data. Econ Syst 42:320–331
Toda, H.Y., Yamamoto, 1995. Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly integrated processes. J Econ 66, 225–250
Ummalla M, Samal A (2018) The impact of hydropower energy consumption on economic growth and CO2 emissions in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 25(35):35725–35737. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3525-6
UNCTAD (2018) The least developed countries report 2018: entrepreneurship for structural transformation: beyond business as usual. New York and Geneva
Wall R, Grafakos S, Gianoli A, Stavropoulos S (2018) Which policy instruments attract foreign direct investments in renewable energy? Clim Pol 19(1):59–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2018.1467826
Wang S, Zhou C, Li G, Feng K (2016) CO2 , economic growth, and energy consumption in China’s provinces: investigating the spatiotemporal and econometric characteristics of China's CO2 emissions. Ecol Indic 69:184–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.04.022
Wang H, Ang BW, Su B (2017) A multi-region structural decomposition analysis of global CO 2 emission intensity. Ecol Econ 142:163–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.023
World Development Indicators (2017) World Bank database. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/bx.klt.dinv.cd.wd
Yazdi KS, Shakouri B (2017) The effect of renewable energy and urbanization on CO2 emissions: a panel data. Energy Sources Part B 13(2):121–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567249.2017.1400607
Zhou Y, Fu J, Kong Y, Wu R (2018) How foreign direct investment influences carbon emissions, based on the empirical analysis of Chinese urban data. Sustainability 10(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072163
Zhu Y, Shi Y, Wu J, Wu L, Xiong W (2018) Exploring the characteristics of CO2 emissions embodied in international trade and the fair share of responsibility. Ecol Econ 146:574–587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.12.020
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by Beijing Natural Science Foundation (8192043).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
Responsible editor: Nicholas Apergis
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ahmad, M., Zhao, ZY., Rehman, A. et al. Revealing long- and short-run empirical interactions among foreign direct investment, renewable power generation, and CO2 emissions in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26, 22220–22245 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05543-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05543-x