Planlama yazinina egemen olan liberal siyaset kurami, devlet-toplum ve siyaset-ekonomi ikilikleri... more Planlama yazinina egemen olan liberal siyaset kurami, devlet-toplum ve siyaset-ekonomi ikiliklerini planlama-piyasa ikiligi temelinde yeniden uretir. Bu baglamda, planlama islevi, tarihsel - toplumsal kokenlerinden kopartilarak evrensellestirilir ve tekniklestirilir. Oysa nesnel gerceklik, planlama islevinin tarihsel ve toplumsal bir olgu oldugunu gostermektedir.Planlamanin tarihsel ve toplumsal kokeni, planlama surecinden izlenebilir. Bu dogrultuda tez calismasinda, “toplumsal ve ekonomik alanin yonetim sureci olarak planlama” inceleme nesnesi olarak tanimlanmistir. Planlama surecinin dogus ve gelisme dinamikleri, tarihsel maddeci yaklasimla tarihsel ugraklarina ozgulenmistir. Soz konusu tarihsel ugraklarda, planlama surecinin, toplumsal uretim iliskilerinin belirlenimine alan taniyan iliskisel devlet kuraminin araclari ile siyasal iktisadi cozumlemesi amaclanmistir.Cozumleme sonucunda, planlamanin dogus ve gelisme nedenselliklerinin ozu itibariyle, iki kavramsal kategoride ele alinabilecegi gorulmustur:(a) Sosyalist sistemi kurucu bir islev olarak planlama sistemi(b) Kapitalist sistemi duzenleyici bir islev olarak planlama (kamu) politikasiDiger taraftan, kavram kategorilerinin kendi tarihsel-toplumsal gelisimlerine gore yeniden uretildigi ve farkli bicimler aldigi gorulmustur. Ornegin, 1930’larda tekelci kapitalizmde devletciligin yonetim bicimi olarak kurulan klasik planlama yaklasimi, 1980’ler ile tasfiye edilmis; finansal emperyalizmin yonetim bicimi olarak yerini stratejik planlamaya devretmistir.Calismanin ornek olayi olarak Turkiye planlama deneyimi, yukarida aktarilan kavramsal kuramsal cercevede cozumlenmistir. Turkiye planlama deneyimi kurulus, donusum ve kopus ugraklarinda, tarihsel ugraklara ozgu siyasal-yonetsel catismasi icerisinde incelenmistir: Temel tarihsel ugraklarda, ilk olarak planlama surecinde yasanan siyasal-yonetsel catisma tarihsel incelemeye tabi tutulmus, ardindan catismanin siyasal cozumlenmesine calisilmistir. Son olarak, catisma sonucunda kurulan yonetim ve orgut incelenmistir.Absract Liberal political theory, dominating the literature on planning, reproduces the dichotomies of politics – economy and state – society within the framework of planning – market dichotomy. In this context, planning is detached from its historical and social roots and attached a universal character to it. However objective reality shows that planning is a historical and social phenomenon.It is possible to examine historical and social roots of planning by following the process of planning. For this reason, the object of inquiry of this thesis is planning which is limited to the “the process of administration of society and economy.” Employing a historical materialist approach, emergence and development dynamics of planning is analyzed by making reference to its historical flux. Than, by utilizing the theoretical tools provided by relational state theory, the political economy of planning in these historical flux is analized.As a result of the analysis, planning is classified within two conceptual categories in terms of its emergence and progress causality:(a) Planning holding a founding function within a socialist system is categorized as planning system,(b) Planning holding a regulatory function within the capitalist system is categorized as planning policy.Due to its historical and social characteristics, planning is reproduced in the course of capitalist development and it can be explained in terms of its specificity to the historical haunts. For instance, in the monopolist capitalist system of 1930’s, planning is established as the administrative mode of statism, constitutes the classical approach to planning, whereas planning is evolved to be strategic planning under the hegemony of global capitalism with 1980’s.As a case study, planning experience of Turkey is elaborated by making references to its historical turning points determined as the political struggle. In those historical turning points, planning process in political – administrative realm is observed. Then, the analysis focuses on the nature of conflict and its implications on the organization and administration of planning.
Soma, a little mining village in western Turkey, became host to one of the greatest industrial cr... more Soma, a little mining village in western Turkey, became host to one of the greatest industrial crimes in mining history when an explosion trapped 800 miners 2 kilometres underground and 4 kilometres from the exit. At the time of writing, the death toll has already exceeded 280, and it may yet exceed 400.
‘Work sharing’ is a labour market instrument devised to distribute a reduced volume of work to th... more ‘Work sharing’ is a labour market instrument devised to distribute a reduced volume of work to the same (or similar) number of workers over a diminished period of working time in order to avoid redundancies. This fascinating and timely study presents the concept and history of work sharing and explores the complexities and trade-offs involved in its use as both a strategy for preserving jobs and a policy for increasing employment.
Planlama yazinina egemen olan liberal siyaset kurami, devlet-toplum ve siyaset-ekonomi ikilikleri... more Planlama yazinina egemen olan liberal siyaset kurami, devlet-toplum ve siyaset-ekonomi ikiliklerini planlama-piyasa ikiligi temelinde yeniden uretir. Bu baglamda, planlama islevi, tarihsel - toplumsal kokenlerinden kopartilarak evrensellestirilir ve tekniklestirilir. Oysa nesnel gerceklik, planlama islevinin tarihsel ve toplumsal bir olgu oldugunu gostermektedir.Planlamanin tarihsel ve toplumsal kokeni, planlama surecinden izlenebilir. Bu dogrultuda tez calismasinda, “toplumsal ve ekonomik alanin yonetim sureci olarak planlama” inceleme nesnesi olarak tanimlanmistir. Planlama surecinin dogus ve gelisme dinamikleri, tarihsel maddeci yaklasimla tarihsel ugraklarina ozgulenmistir. Soz konusu tarihsel ugraklarda, planlama surecinin, toplumsal uretim iliskilerinin belirlenimine alan taniyan iliskisel devlet kuraminin araclari ile siyasal iktisadi cozumlemesi amaclanmistir.Cozumleme sonucunda, planlamanin dogus ve gelisme nedenselliklerinin ozu itibariyle, iki kavramsal kategoride ele alinabilecegi gorulmustur:(a) Sosyalist sistemi kurucu bir islev olarak planlama sistemi(b) Kapitalist sistemi duzenleyici bir islev olarak planlama (kamu) politikasiDiger taraftan, kavram kategorilerinin kendi tarihsel-toplumsal gelisimlerine gore yeniden uretildigi ve farkli bicimler aldigi gorulmustur. Ornegin, 1930’larda tekelci kapitalizmde devletciligin yonetim bicimi olarak kurulan klasik planlama yaklasimi, 1980’ler ile tasfiye edilmis; finansal emperyalizmin yonetim bicimi olarak yerini stratejik planlamaya devretmistir.Calismanin ornek olayi olarak Turkiye planlama deneyimi, yukarida aktarilan kavramsal kuramsal cercevede cozumlenmistir. Turkiye planlama deneyimi kurulus, donusum ve kopus ugraklarinda, tarihsel ugraklara ozgu siyasal-yonetsel catismasi icerisinde incelenmistir: Temel tarihsel ugraklarda, ilk olarak planlama surecinde yasanan siyasal-yonetsel catisma tarihsel incelemeye tabi tutulmus, ardindan catismanin siyasal cozumlenmesine calisilmistir. Son olarak, catisma sonucunda kurulan yonetim ve orgut incelenmistir.Absract Liberal political theory, dominating the literature on planning, reproduces the dichotomies of politics – economy and state – society within the framework of planning – market dichotomy. In this context, planning is detached from its historical and social roots and attached a universal character to it. However objective reality shows that planning is a historical and social phenomenon.It is possible to examine historical and social roots of planning by following the process of planning. For this reason, the object of inquiry of this thesis is planning which is limited to the “the process of administration of society and economy.” Employing a historical materialist approach, emergence and development dynamics of planning is analyzed by making reference to its historical flux. Than, by utilizing the theoretical tools provided by relational state theory, the political economy of planning in these historical flux is analized.As a result of the analysis, planning is classified within two conceptual categories in terms of its emergence and progress causality:(a) Planning holding a founding function within a socialist system is categorized as planning system,(b) Planning holding a regulatory function within the capitalist system is categorized as planning policy.Due to its historical and social characteristics, planning is reproduced in the course of capitalist development and it can be explained in terms of its specificity to the historical haunts. For instance, in the monopolist capitalist system of 1930’s, planning is established as the administrative mode of statism, constitutes the classical approach to planning, whereas planning is evolved to be strategic planning under the hegemony of global capitalism with 1980’s.As a case study, planning experience of Turkey is elaborated by making references to its historical turning points determined as the political struggle. In those historical turning points, planning process in political – administrative realm is observed. Then, the analysis focuses on the nature of conflict and its implications on the organization and administration of planning.
Soma, a little mining village in western Turkey, became host to one of the greatest industrial cr... more Soma, a little mining village in western Turkey, became host to one of the greatest industrial crimes in mining history when an explosion trapped 800 miners 2 kilometres underground and 4 kilometres from the exit. At the time of writing, the death toll has already exceeded 280, and it may yet exceed 400.
‘Work sharing’ is a labour market instrument devised to distribute a reduced volume of work to th... more ‘Work sharing’ is a labour market instrument devised to distribute a reduced volume of work to the same (or similar) number of workers over a diminished period of working time in order to avoid redundancies. This fascinating and timely study presents the concept and history of work sharing and explores the complexities and trade-offs involved in its use as both a strategy for preserving jobs and a policy for increasing employment.
Uploads
Papers by Erinc Yeldan