Skip to main content
Background: Landslides hazard analyses entail a scale-dependent approach in order to mitigate accordingly the damages and other negative consequences at the respective scales of occurrence. Medium or large scale landslide run-out... more
Background: Landslides hazard analyses entail a scale-dependent approach in order to mitigate accordingly the damages and other negative consequences at the respective scales of occurrence. Medium or large scale landslide run-out modelling for many possible landslide initiation areas has been a very difficult task in the past. This arises from the inability of the run-out models to compute the displacement with a large amount of individual initiation areas as it turns out to be computationally strenuous. Most of the existing physically based run-out models have difficulties in handling such situations. For this reason, empirical methods have been used as a practical mean to predict landslides mobility at a medium scale (1: 10,000 to 1: 50,000). They are the most widely used techniques to estimate the maximum run-out distance and affected zones not only locally but also regionally. In this context, a medium scale numerical model for flow-like mass movements in urban and mountainous areas was developed.
Research Interests:
Mapping the hazard from quick-clay slides (QCS) needs to consider, not only the release area, but also the entire flow path. However, models and an associated method for estimating the run-out distance are currently missing. A comparative... more
Mapping the hazard from quick-clay slides (QCS) needs to consider, not only the release area, but also the entire flow path. However, models and an associated method for estimating the run-out distance are currently missing. A comparative analysis of field observations reveals the run-out distance to scale linearly with the retrogression distance and as a power of the slide volume. Back-calculations of selected events with different numerical models (BING, DAN3D, MassMov2D) show that models developed for other slide types are not suitable for predicting run-out distances in an objective way, based on measured soil properties. A numerical run-out model for QCS needs to include the progression of remolding, the rafting of non-sensitive soil at the top, and retrogressive failure, which must be either computed or specified through the initial conditions. In most cases, a (quasi-)3D code will be needed.
This section discusses the analysis of multi-hazards in a mountainous environment at a medium scale (1:25,000) using Geographic Information Systems. Although the term 'multi-hazards' has been used extensively in literature... more
This section discusses the analysis of multi-hazards in a mountainous environment at a medium scale (1:25,000) using Geographic Information Systems. Although the term 'multi-hazards' has been used extensively in literature there are still very limited approaches to analyze the effects of more than one hazard in the same area, especially related to their interaction. The section starts with an overview of the problem of multi-hazard risk assessment, and indicates the various types of multi-hazard interactions, such as coupled events, concatenated events, and events changing the predisposing factors for other ones. An illustration is given of multi-hazards in a mountainous environment, and their interrelationships,
The geomorphological change detection through the comparison of repeated topographic surveys is a recent approach that benefits greatly from the latest developments in topographical data acquisition techniques. Among them, airborne LiDAR... more
The geomorphological change detection through the comparison of repeated topographic surveys is a recent approach that benefits greatly from the latest developments in topographical data acquisition techniques. Among them, airborne LiDAR makes the monitoring of geomorphological changes a more reliable and accurate approach for natural hazard and risk management. In this study, two LiDAR digital terrain models (DTMs) (2 m resolution) were acquired just before and after a complex 340 000 m3 landslide event (4 November 2010) that generated a debris flow in the channel of the Rotolon catchment (eastern Italian Alps). The analysis of these data was used to set up the initial condition for the application of a dynamic model.

The comparison between the pre- and post-event DTMs allowed us to identify erosion and depositional areas and the volume of the landslide. The knowledge of the phenomenon dynamics was the base of a sound back analysis of the event with the 3-D numerical model DAN3D. This particular code was selected for its capability to modify the rheology and the parameters of the moving mass during run-out, as actually observed along the path of the 2010 debris flow.

Nowadays some portions of Mt. Rotolon flank are still moving and show signs of detachment. The same soil parameters used in the back-analysis model could be used to simulate the run-out for possible future landslides, allowing us to generate reliable risk scenarios useful for awareness of civil defense and strategy of emergency plans.
On 4 January, 2009, more than 5 million cubic metres of limestone and calcareous breccias detached from the "Los Chorros" hill and travelled along a tributary ravine of the Chixoy river in the municipality of San Cristóbal Verapaz,... more
On 4 January, 2009, more than 5 million cubic metres of limestone and calcareous breccias detached from the "Los Chorros" hill and travelled along a tributary ravine of the Chixoy river in the municipality of San Cristóbal Verapaz, department of Alta Verapaz, Guatemala. At the time of this landslide, several persons were crossing roads and foot trails downstream of the release area. As of 14 January, authorities had reported 38 casualties, 50 missing and 5 injured persons. Along the landslide path, a 1.2 km segment of the 7W National Highway was destroyed, cutting the sole access route between San Cristóbal Verapaz and the western department of Quiché where numerous inhabitants of Alta Verapaz commute to work, especially during the coffee harvest season from October to March (with its peak on January). In response to this disaster, the Guatemalan government established four priorities: search and rescue activities, relief aid to victims and their families, evacuation of villages at risk and selection and construction of a temporary access route and a permanent road. In an attempt to provide additional elements to decision-makers of the Guatemalan authorities, this report is aimed to characterise the context of this landslide from a geosciences perspective. Preliminary assessments of the 4 January event and of other potentially unstable zones identified in the surrounding areas are also performed. The first accounts of ground instabilities in this area date back to 1590 when a 4.0 MS earthquake was associated with the collapse of a karst cave. In 1881, a Guatemalan newspaper reported that the San Cristóbal (Chichoj) lagoon was created after a ground subsidence was triggered by an earthquake. In 1983, after less than one year of operations, a ~50 m segment of the 26-km long pressure tunnel in the Chixoy hydro electrical project was damaged due to an anhydrite karst produced during tunnel operations. In response to this event, repair and strengthening works were carried out and power plant operation was re-started in 1985. At the end of November 2008, small landslides occurred in the surroundings of the area of the 4 January event and on mid December, a few number of larger slides occurred killing 2 persons and blocking the 7W National Highway. Rumbling noise was often reported by passersby. No heavy rainfall seems to be associated with the triggering of these events and rainfall accumulations during November 2008 (transition from rainy to dry season) were below the monthly normal rainfall. Immediately prior to these landslides, there are no earthquake events located in this area by the Guatemalan seismic network. During November 2008, three cold fronts affected Guatemala, producing freezing temperatures in some locations especially during the third week of November. In the surroundings of the area of the 4 January landslide, frost susceptibility ranges from low to medium. The landslide took place in a catchment that follows a NNE fault which to the south intersects the EW Chixoy-Polochic fault (part of the transcurrent boundary of the North American and the Caribbean plates) 5 km downstream of the release area. Some fumarolic activity is currently observed in the landslide site. Based on the above elements and on observations from field reconnaissance missions, some hypotheses are formulated to explain the conditioning and triggering factors for the events in November and December and particularly for the 4 January landslide. These hypotheses are aimed to help to identify other potential instabilities in the surroundings. Back-calculation of flow parameters for the 4 January landslide has been possible based on estimation of velocities using video footage of the event and simulations with two different models for landslide dynamics across three-dimensional terrain: DAN3D developed at the University of British Columbia and RAMMS developed at the WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF. These back-calculated parameters have enabled the estimation of impact areas due to landslides that can be potentially released in surrounding slopes with similar instability features to the "Los Chorros" hill. Even though these estimations may be improved as more information becomes available for this event, the authors hope that this report contributes with some elements for decision-makers regarding short- and intermediate-term activities in response to this disaster.
In landslide risk research, the majority of past studies have focused on hazard analysis, with only few targeting the concept of vulnerability. When debris flows are considered, there is no consensus or even modest agreement on a... more
In landslide risk research, the majority of past studies have focused on hazard analysis, with only few targeting the concept of vulnerability. When debris flows are considered, there is no consensus or even modest agreement on a generalized methodology to estimate physical vulnerability of the affected buildings. Very few quantitative relationships have been proposed between intensities and vulnerability values. More importantly, in most of the existing relationships, information on process intensity is often missing or only described semi-quantitatively. However, robust assessment of vulnerabilities along with the associated uncertainties is of utmost importance from a quantitative risk analysis point of view. On the morning of 13th July 2008, after more than two days of intense rainfall, several debris and mud flows were released in the central part of Valtellina, an Italian alpine valley in Lombardy Region. One of the largest muddy-debris flows occurred in Selvetta, a fraction of Colorina municipality. The result was the complete destruction of two buildings, and damage at varying severity levels to eight others. The authors had the chance to gather detailed information about the event, by conducting extensive field work and interviews with local inhabitants, civil protection teams, and officials. In addition to the data gathered from the field studies, the main characteristics of the debris flow have been estimated using numerical and empirical approaches. The extensive data obtained from Selvetta event gave an opportunity to develop three separate empirical vulnerability curves, which are functions of deposition height, debris flow velocity, and pressure, respectively. Deposition heights were directly obtained from field surveys, whereas the velocity and pressure values were back-calculated using the finite difference program FLO2D. The vulnerability was defined as the ratio between the monetary loss and the reconstruction value. The monetary losses were obtained from official RASDA documents, which were compiled for claim purposes. For each building, the approximate reconstruction value was calculated according to the building type and size, using the official data given in the Housing Prices Index prepared by the Engineers and Architects of Milan. The resulting vulnerability curves were compared to those in the literature, and among themselves. Specific recommendations were given regarding the most suitable parameter to be used for characterizing the intensity of debris flows within the context of physical vulnerability.
Entrainment of channel path material, and material deposition during run-out are key features of many rapid landslides like debris flows. Such mechanisms are able to change significantly the mobility of the flow, through rapid changes of... more
Entrainment of channel path material, and material deposition during run-out are key features of many rapid landslides like debris flows. Such mechanisms are able to change significantly the mobility of the flow, through rapid changes of the flow volume and of its rheology. Models using both a constant rheology and a constant volume cannot yield accurate forecast of debris-flows characteristics (velocity, discharge, flow height, spreading area), especially for debris flows occurring in heterogeneous torrential watersheds characterized by various geological settings and surficial deposits. The objective of this paper is to present and test a simple 1D debris-flow model with a material entrainment concept based on limit equilibrium considerations and the generation of excess pore water pressure through undrained loading of the in situ material. The debris flow model propagation is based on a one dimensional finite difference solution of a depth-averaged form of the Navier-Stokes equations of fluid motions. The flows are treated as a one phase material, which behaviour is controlled by different rheological characteristics depending on the liquid/solid ratio. In this model, users are able to implement a change in rheology at the onset of entrainment The model is tested on a debris flow event that occurred in 2003 in the Faucon torrent, and for which a detailed database on the sediment budget per reaches is available.
Debris flows as a result of shallow landslides are increasingly a concern in Kerala, the south western state of India. The plateau margins of highland Kerala (The Western Ghats) have all prerequisites of an active erosion zone where the... more
Debris flows as a result of shallow landslides are increasingly a concern in Kerala, the south western state of India. The plateau margins of highland Kerala (The Western Ghats) have all prerequisites of an active erosion zone where the natural terrain setup is conducive to slope failure/mass movements. Rainfall during two monsoons (South West and North East) that are effective in the state is identified as the primary trigger of debris flows. The flows are confined to the existing drainage lines and widen the streambeds that they follow, causing significant crop destruction (and occasionally loss of lives) along the path. Most often the amount of material that initiates the flows is less than a 1000 m3. Scouring is seen along the runout zone adding often an additional 30 to 80% more material. One such debris flow event of 2001 which occurred in the Kottayam district of Kerala was modelled with a Coulomb frictional and a Voellmy model in the DAN3D software. DAN3D is based on a Lagrangian formulation that discretises the flow in a number of particles representing bed-normal columns of flow. The values of the field variables for each particle are calculated at each time step using an interpolation technique based on Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH). Bed entrainment was simulated after defining an entrainment zone, a maximum depth of supply material and the average growth or erosion rate. Result of the modeling shows that shallow failures using frictional material overestimates the runout zone and velocities. The Voellmy model underestimate deposit thickness where spreading is dominant but the velocity is better fitted during the course of the flow. Entrainment of material from the path and the ability to change rheology depending on the path material can be important. The reasonable results of the modeling show its flexibility which can be used to predict a simplified behaviour of debris flows.
On Sunday morning of 13th July 2008, after more than two days of intense rainfall, several debris and mud flows were released in the central part of Valtellina valley between Morbegno and Berbenno. One of the largest debris flows occurred... more
On Sunday morning of 13th July 2008, after more than two days of intense rainfall, several debris and mud flows were released in the central part of Valtellina valley between Morbegno and Berbenno. One of the largest debris flows occurred in Selvetta, a fraction of Colorina municipality. The debris flow event was reconstructed after extensive field work and interviews with local inhabitants and civil protection teams. At first several rock blocks about 2 m3 in size fell down from the direction of the torrent. The blocks were followed by a wave of debris and mud that immediately destroyed one building and caused damage to other nine houses. A stream flow following the debris flow consisting of fine mud with high water content that partially washed away the accumulation of deposits from the debris phase could also be distinguished. Geomorphologic investigations allowed identification of five main sections of the flow: 1) the proper scarp; 2) path in the forested area; 3) path on the alpine meadows; 4) accelerating section; 5) accumulation area. The initiation area of the flow is situated at 1760 m. a.s.l. (1480 m above the deposition zone) in a coniferous forest. The proper scarp consisted of an area of approximately 20 m2 in size, and a height of about 0.8 m. The final volume of the debris was estimated by field mapping to be between 12 000 and 15 000 m3. It was observed that erosion and entrainment played an important role in the development of the debris flow. The Selvetta event was modelled with the FLO2D program. FLO2D is an Eulerian formulation with a finite differences numerical scheme that requires the specification of an input hydrograph. The internal stresses are isotropic and the basal shear stresses are calculated using a quadratic model. Entrainment was modeled at each section of the flow, and different hydrographs were produced in agreement with the behavior of the debris flow during its course. The significance of calculated values of pressure and velocity were investigated in terms of the resulting damage to the affected buildings. The physical damage was quantified for each affected structure within the context of physical vulnerability, which is defined as the ratio between the monetary loss and the reconstruction value. Two different empirical vulnerability curves were obtained, which are functions of debris flow velocity and pressure, respectively.
Estimating the magnitude and the intensity of rapid landslides like debris flows is fundamental to evaluate quantitatively the hazard in a specific location. Intensity varies through the travelled course of the flow and can be described... more
Estimating the magnitude and the intensity of rapid landslides like debris flows is fundamental to evaluate quantitatively the hazard in a specific location. Intensity varies through the travelled course of the flow and can be described by physical features such as deposited volume, velocities, height of the flow, impact forces and pressures. Dynamic run-out models are able to characterize the
Abstract For a quantitative risk assessment framework it is essential to assess not only the hazardous process itself but to perform an analysis of their consequences. This quantitative assessment should include the expected monetary... more
Abstract For a quantitative risk assessment framework it is essential to assess not only the hazardous process itself but to perform an analysis of their consequences. This quantitative assessment should include the expected monetary losses as the product of the probability of occurrence of a hazard with a given magnitude and its vulnerability. A quantifiable integrated approach of both hazard and risk is becoming a required practice in risk reduction management. Dynamic run-out models for debris flows are able to calculate physical ...
Abstract Inside the framework of the European research network Mountain Risks, an interdisciplinary research group has been working in the Consortium of Mountain Municipalities of Valtellina di Tirano (northern Italy). This area has been... more
Abstract Inside the framework of the European research network Mountain Risks, an interdisciplinary research group has been working in the Consortium of Mountain Municipalities of Valtellina di Tirano (northern Italy). This area has been continuously affected by several mountain hazards such as landslides, debris flows and floods that directly affect the population, and in some cases caused several deaths and million euros of losses. An aim of the interdisciplinary work in this study area, is to integrate different ...
This section discusses the analysis of multi-hazards in a mountainous environment at a medium scale (1:25,000) using Geographic Information Systems. Although the term 'multi-hazards' has been used extensively in literature there are still... more
This section discusses the analysis of multi-hazards in a mountainous environment at a medium scale (1:25,000) using Geographic Information Systems. Although the term 'multi-hazards' has been used extensively in literature there are still very limited approaches to analyze the effects of more than one hazard in the same area, especially related to their interaction. The section starts with an overview of the problem of multi-hazard risk assessment, and indicates the various types of multi-hazard interactions, such as coupled events, concatenated events, and events changing the predisposing factors for other ones. An illustration is given of multi-hazards in a mountainous environment, and their interrelationships,