8000 [Workflow] Introduce concept of SupportStrategyInterface by andesk · Pull Request #20751 · symfony/symfony · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content

[Workflow] Introduce concept of SupportStrategyInterface #20751

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 13 commits into from
Closed
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 8 commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -274,7 +274,6 @@ private function addWorkflowSection(ArrayNodeDefinition $rootNode)
->end()
->end()
->arrayNode('supports')
->isRequired()
->beforeNormalization()
->ifString()
->then(function ($v) { return array($v); })
Expand All @@ -287,6 +286,9 @@ private function addWorkflowSection(ArrayNodeDefinition $rootNode)
->end()
->end()
->end()
->scalarNode('support_strategy')
->cannotBeEmpty()
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this forbids resetting it to null in a later file to use supports again

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So should I simply remove it?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ping @stof

->end()
->scalarNode('initial_place')->defaultNull()->end()
->arrayNode('places')
->isRequired()
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -325,6 +327,10 @@ private function addWorkflowSection(ArrayNodeDefinition $rootNode)
->end()
->end()
->end()
->validate()
->ifTrue(function ($v) { return isset($v['supports']) && isset($v['support_strategy']); })
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

supports will always be set as it is a prototyped array node and so has a default. You need to check whether it is the empty array instead.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So return !empty($v['supports']) && isset($v['support_strategy']); ?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes

->thenInvalid('"supports" and "support_strategy" cannot be used together.')
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Don't we also need to make sure that one of supports or support_strategy is configured?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Have not seen other examples for that yet, but of course I can add a second validation for both being !isset()?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

something like empty('supports') && empty('support_strategy')

->end()
->end()
->end()
->end()
Expand Down
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -436,7 +436,7 @@ private function registerWorkflowConfiguration(array $workflows, ContainerBuilde

// Create MarkingStore
if (isset($workflow['marking_store']['type'])) {
$markingStoreDefinition = new DefinitionDecorator('workflow.marking_store.'.$workflow['marking_store']['type']);
$markingStoreDefinition = new DefinitionDecorator('workflow.marking_store.' . $workflow['marking_store']['type']);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

to be reverted

foreach ($workflow['marking_store']['arguments'] as $argument) {
$markingStoreDefinition->addArgument($argument);
}
Expand All @@ -458,8 +458,17 @@ private function registerWorkflowConfiguration(array $workflows, ContainerBuilde
$container->setDefinition(sprintf('%s.definition', $workflowId), $definitionDefinition);

// Add workflow to Registry
foreach ($workflow['supports'] as $supportedClass) {
$registryDefinition->addMethodCall('add', array(new Reference($workflowId), $supportedClass));
if (isset($workflow['supports'])) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it is always set here. You should check for the array not being empty

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So if (!empty($workflow['supports'])) instead?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

having a test covering this combination would probably be good

foreach ($workflow['supports'] as $supportedClassName) {
$strategyDefinition = new Definition(
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You never register the $strategyDefinition in the container.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should be put on one line.

Workflow\SupportStrategy\ClassInstanceSupportStrategy::class, array($supportedClassName)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You should use a use statement instead of using the FQCN here.

);
$strategyDefinition->setPublic(false);
$registryDefinition->addMethodCall('add', array(new Reference($workflowId), $strategyDefinition));
}
}
if (isset($workflow['support_strategy'])) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

could probably be an elseif as the two options are exclusive

$registryDefinition->addMethodCall('add', array(new Reference($workflowId), new Reference($workflow['support_strategy'])));
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As a second option, "support_strategy" expects to be a reference to a registered service implementing the introduced SupportStrategyInterface.

}
}
}
Expand Down
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -170,6 +170,10 @@ public function testWorkflows()
$markingStoreRef = $serviceMarkingStoreWorkflowDefinition->getArgument(1);
$this->assertInstanceOf(Reference::class, $markingStoreRef);
$this->assertEquals('workflow_service', (string) $markingStoreRef);

$this->assertTrue($container->hasDefinition('workflow.registry', 'Workflow registry is registered as a service'));
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Until now, there was not coverage for registry at all. I did not want to introduce too much, but the following should we ok?

$registryDefinition = $container->getDefinition('workflow.registry');
$this->assertGreaterThan(0, count($registryDefinition->getMethodCalls()));
}

/**
Expand Down
35 changes: 24 additions & 11 deletions src/Symfony/Component/Workflow/Registry.php
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
namespace Symfony\Component\Workflow;

use Symfony\Component\Workflow\Exception\InvalidArgumentException;
use Symfony\Component\Workflow\SupportStrategy\SupportStrategyInterface;

/**
* @author Fabien Potencier <fabien@symfony.com>
Expand All @@ -22,26 +23,35 @@ class Registry
private $workflows = array();

/**
* @param Workflow $workflow
* @param string $className
* @param Workflow $workflow
* @param string|SupportStrategyInterface $supportStrategy
*/
public function add(Workflow $workflow, $className)
public function add(Workflow $workflow, $supportStrategy)
{
$this->workflows[] = array($workflow, $className);
if (!$supportStrategy instanceof SupportStrategyInterface) {
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As mentioned in previous comments, to avoid BC break we are allowing string as a fallback, checking it and otherwise throw deprecation warning.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No BC break anymore after doing suggested changes thanks to @iltar Though it seems triggering the deprecated error leads to CI integrations to fail... Any ideas how to fix this?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks to @xabbuh I figured out the @group legacy annotation. Should be fine now :)

if (!is_string($supportStrategy)) {
throw new InvalidArgumentException('Expecting instance of SupportStrategyInterface or class name as a string.');
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think we need to have this check. The docblock is pretty about what types you are allowed to pass.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That was suggested by @iltar and I think it's fine to keep it as a check?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If I am not mistaken, we don't do similar checks anywhere else, but rely on the fact that we claimed through the docblock which types we expect.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Any other oppinion on that? Should I remove it? ping @lyrixx @Nyholm

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Indeed this should be removed.

}

@trigger_error('Support of class name string was deprecated after version 3.2 and won\'t work anymore in 4.0.', E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}

$this->workflows[] = array($workflow, $supportStrategy);
}

/**
* @param object $subject
* @param string|null $workflowName
* @param null|string $workflowName
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should be reverted

*
* @return Workflow
* @throws InvalidArgumentException
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

missing empty line before this line

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we don't add this phpdoc when we cannot document in which case the exception is thrown

*/
public function get($subject, $workflowName = null)
{
$matched = null;

foreach ($this->workflows as list($workflow, $className)) {
if ($this->supports($workflow, $className, $subject, $workflowName)) {
foreach ($this->workflows as list($workflow, $supportStrategy)) {
if ($this->supports($workflow, $supportStrategy, $subject, $workflowName)) {
if ($matched) {
throw new InvalidArgumentException('At least two workflows match this subject. Set a different name on each and use the second (name) argument of this method.');
}
Expand All @@ -56,16 +66,19 @@ public function get($subject, $workflowName = null)
return $matched;
}

private function supports(Workflow $workflow, $className, $subject, $name)
private function supports(Workflow $workflow, $supportStrategy, $subject, $workflowName)
{
if (!$subject instanceof $className) {
if (is_string($supportStrategy) && !$subject instanceof $supportStrategy) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you add a comment before this line:

// Keep BC. To be removed in 4.0

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Rather than dealing with BC here, I would convert the string to a SupportStrategy when setting it instead.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So @stof , you mean that inside the add() method I would create a ClassInstanceSupportStrategy in the deprecation case?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should I still add a BC comment somewhere? ping @lyrixx ?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The two conditions could then be simplified to:

if (!$supportStrategy->supports($workflow, $subject)) {
    return false;
}

return false;
}
if ($supportStrategy instanceof SupportStrategyInterface && !$supportStrategy->supports($workflow, $subject)) {
return false;
}

if (null === $name) {
if (null === $workflowName) {
return true;
}

return $name === $workflow->getName();
return $workflowName === $workflow->getName();
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All this method could be simplified:

if (null !== $workflowName && $workflowName !== $workflow->getName()) {
      return false;
}
  
// Keep BC. To be removed in 4.0
if (is_string($supportStrategy)) {
    return $subject instanceof $supportStrategy;
}

return $supportStrategy->supports($workflow, $subject);

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So if @stof 's idea above will be implemented, this can even be more simplified, right?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

indeed.

(Please, ping me when you're ready. Thanks)

}
}
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
<?php

namespace Symfony\Component\Workflow\SupportStrategy;

use Symfony\Component\Workflow\Workflow;

class ClassInstanceSupportStrategy implements SupportStrategyInterface
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

you should add a docblock and add yourself as an author

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

same for the interface

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

and the class should become final

{
/** @var string */
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Comment should be removed

private $className;

/**
* @param string $className
*/
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

docblock should be removed

public function __construct($className)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

you should add a docblock documenting the argument as a string

{
$this->className = $className;
}

/**
* {@inheritdoc} 10000
*/
public function supports(Workflow $workflow, $subject)
{
return $subject instanceof $this->className;
}
}
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
<?php

/*
* This file is part of the Symfony package.
*
* (c) Fabien Potencier <fabien@symfony.com>
*
* For the full copyright and license information, please view the LICENSE
* file that was distributed with this source code.
*/

namespace Symfony\Component\Workflow\SupportStrategy;

use Symfony\Component\Workflow\Workflow;

interface SupportStrategyInterface
{
/**
* @param Workflow $workflow
* @param object $subject
*
* @return bool
*/
public function supports(Workflow $workflow, $subject);
}
52 changes: 47 additions & 5 deletions src/Symfony/Component/Workflow/Tests/RegistryTest.php
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
use Symfony\Component\Workflow\Definition;
use Symfony\Component\Workflow\MarkingStore\MarkingStoreInterface;
use Symfony\Component\Workflow\Registry;
use Symfony\Component\Workflow\SupportStrategy\SupportStrategyInterface;
use Symfony\Component\Workflow\Workflow;

class RegistryTest extends \PHPUnit_Framework_TestCase
Expand All @@ -14,20 +15,27 @@ class RegistryTest extends \PHPUnit_Framework_TestCase

protected function setUp()
{
$workflows = array();

$this->registry = new Registry();

$this->registry->add(new Workflow(new Definition(array(), array()), $this->getMockBuilder(MarkingStoreInterface::class)->getMock(), $this->getMockBuilder(EventDispatcherInterface::class)->getMock(), 'workflow1'), Subject1::class);
$this->registry->add(new Workflow(new Definition(array(), array()), $this->getMockBuilder(MarkingStoreInterface::class)->getMock(), $this->getMockBuilder(EventDispatcherInterface::class)->getMock(), 'workflow2'), Subject2::class);
$this->registry->add(new Workflow(new Definition(array(), array()), $this->getMockBuilder(MarkingStoreInterface::class)->getMock(), $this->getMockBuilder(EventDispatcherInterface::class)->getMock(), 'workflow3'), Subject2::class);
$this->registry->add(new Workflow(new Definition(array(), array()), $this->getMockBuilder(MarkingStoreInterface::class)->getMock(), $this->getMockBuilder(EventDispatcherInterface::class)->getMock(), 'workflow1'), $this->getSupportStrategy(Subject1::class));
$this->registry->add(new Workflow(new Definition(array(), array()), $this->getMockBuilder(MarkingStoreInterface::class)->getMock(), $this->getMockBuilder(EventDispatcherInterface::class)->getMock(), 'workflow2'), $this->getSupportStrategy(Subject2::class));
$this->registry->add(new Workflow(new Definition(array(), array()), $this->getMockBuilder(MarkingStoreInterface::class)->getMock(), $this->getMockBuilder(EventDispatcherInterface::class)->getMock(), 'workflow3'), $this->getSupportStrategy(Subject2::class));
}

protected function tearDown()
{
$this->registry = null;
}

/**
* @expectedException \Symfony\Component\Workflow\Exception\InvalidArgumentException
* @expectedExceptionMessage Expecting instance of SupportStrategyInterface or class name as a string.
*/
public function testAddUnsupportedSupportStrategy()
{
$this->registry->add(new Workflow(new Definition(array(), array()), $this->getMockBuilder(MarkingStoreInterface::class)->getMock(), $this->getMockBuilder(EventDispatcherInterface::class)->getMock(), 'workflow4'), array(Subject1::class, Subject2::class));
}

public function testGetWithSuccess()
{
$workflow = $this->registry->get(new Subject1());
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -64,6 +72,40 @@ public function testGetWithNoMatch()
$this->assertInstanceOf(Workflow::class, $w1);
$this->assertSame('workflow1', $w1->getName());
}

/**
* @group legacy
*/
public function testGetWithSuccessLegacyStrategy()
{
$registry = new Registry();

$registry->add(new Workflow(new Definition(array(), array()), $this->getMockBuilder(MarkingStoreInterface::class)->getMock(), $this->getMockBuilder(EventDispatcherInterface::class)->getMock(), 'workflow1'), Subject1::class);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

$this->getMock(SupportStrategyInterface::class) is enough
(same bellow)

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

According to #20984 the current syntax should be kept

$registry->add(new Workflow(new Definition(array(), array()), $this->getMockBuilder(MarkingStoreInterface::class)->getMock(), $this->getMockBuilder(EventDispatcherInterface::class)->getMock(), 'workflow2'), Subject2::class);

$workflow = $registry->get(new Subject1());
$this->assertInstanceOf(Workflow::class, $workflow);
$this->assertSame('workflow1', $workflow->getName());

$workflow = $registry->get(new Subject1(), 'workflow1');
$this->assertInstanceOf(Workflow::class, $workflow);
$this->assertSame('workflow1', $workflow->getName());

$workflow = $registry->get(new Subject2(), 'workflow2');
$this->assertInstanceOf(Workflow::class, $workflow);
$this->assertSame('workflow2', $workflow->getName());
}

private function getSupportStrategy($supportedClassName)
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The following might not be the best idea, but keeps the changes minimal...

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should be named createSupportStrategy

F438

{
$strategy = $this->getMockBuilder(SupportStrategyInterface::class)->getMock();
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

$this->getMock(SupportStrategyInterface::class) is enough

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

According to #20984 the current syntax should be kept

$strategy->expects($this->any())->method('supports')
->will($this->returnCallback(function($workflow, $subject) use ($supportedClassName) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

missing space after function

return $subject instanceof $supportedClassName;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why do you use a mock here when you can use the ClassInstanceSupportStrategy ?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Don't know how this is handled in Symfony environment, but as I want to test the registry alone I personally prefer mocking all other collaborators. Should I change it?

}));

return $strategy;
}
}

class Subject1
Expand Down
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
<?php

namespace Symfony\Component\Workflow\Tests\SupportStrategy;

use Symfony\Component\Workflow\SupportStrategy\ClassInstanceSupportStrategy;
use Symfony\Component\Workflow\Workflow;

class ClassInstanceSupportStrategyTest extends \PHPUnit_Framework_TestCase
{
public function testSupportsIfClassInstance()
{
$strategy = new ClassInstanceSupportStrategy('Symfony\Component\Workflow\Tests\SupportStrategy\Subject1');

$this->assertTrue($strategy->supports($this->getWorkflow(), new Subject1()));
}

public function testSupportsIfNotClassInstance()
{
$strategy = new ClassInstanceSupportStrategy('Symfony\Component\Workflow\Tests\SupportStrategy\Subject2');

$this->assertFalse($strategy->supports($this->getWorkflow(), new Subject1()));
}

private function getWorkflow()
{
return $this->getMockBuilder(Workflow::class)
->disableOriginalConstructor()
->getMock();
}
}

class Subject1
{
}
class Subject2
{
}
0