Update to references #49
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks, I like the line breaks!
I was just wondering about the algorithm to generate the keys.
Why stop combining authors at two?
I think the only consistent options are either using only ever the first name or using all names.
But anyway, this inconsistency was already there before your changes ...
|
If you do a citation in a paper you would use "Name1" for one author "Name1 and Name2" for two authors and "Name1 et al." for three or more authors. That was the idea behind the referencing and it is the same as in SFS theory. But I agree that most probably it would be better to use just one name here as I'm also not willing to add "etal" into the brackets. I will merge this first and then think again about it. |
|
Yes, "Name1 and Name2 (2007)" or "(Name1 and Name2, 2007)" would be fine, but "[Name1Name22007]" is an entirely different thing. Did you ever try https://github.com/mcmtroffaes/sphinxcontrib-bibtex? |
|
I thought about it, but I never tried. It is a little bit buggy using multiple pages, but I will test it. |
|
I wasn't aware of the multi-page issue, but using |
This includes:
1.) Update the references to the source image model from #42 to be in line with #46 by moving them to the extra
doc/references.rstfile2.) Cleaning up
doc/references.rstby introducing line breaks3.) Fixing a typo