8000 Remove underscore in container name by Reet00 · Pull Request #2903 · secureCodeBox/secureCodeBox · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content

Conversation

@Reet00
Copy link
Contributor
@Reet00 Reet00 commented Feb 13, 2025

Description

Remove underscore in container name since it is allowed in image names but not conatiner names

Container and images follow different naming conventions and for a valid image with an underscore a scheduledscan could not be created.

closes #2706

Checklist

  • Test your changes as thoroughly as possible before you commit them. Preferably, automate your test by unit/integration tests.
  • Make sure that all your commits are signed-off and that you are added to the Contributors file.
  • Make sure that all CI finish successfully.
  • Optional (but appreciated): Make sure that all commits are Verified.

…ge names

Container and images follow different naming conventions and for a valid
image with an underscore a scheduledscan could not be created

Signed-off-by: Samreet Singh <samreet.singh@iteratec.com>
@Reet00 Reet00 self-assigned this Feb 13, 2025
@netlify
Copy link
netlify bot commented Feb 13, 2025

Deploy Preview for docs-securecodebox ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 39d81e3
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/docs-securecodebox/deploys/67c997eefd3a5c00086f3e2a
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-2903--docs-securecodebox.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@github-actions
Copy link
github-actions bot commented Feb 13, 2025

🦙 MegaLinter status: ⚠️ WARNING

Descriptor Linter Files Fixed Errors Elapsed time
⚠️ GO golangci-lint yes 1 0.43s

See detailed report in MegaLinter reports
Set VALIDATE_ALL_CODEBASE: true in mega-linter.yml to validate all sources, not only the diff

MegaLinter is graciously provided by OX Security

@Weltraumschaf
Copy link
Member

@Reet00 Is this ready to review? I wonder that there is no unit test necessary to update after this change?

Signed-off-by: Samreet Singh <samreet.singh@iteratec.com>
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In Progress to Reviewer Approved in secureCodeBox Mar 6, 2025
@J12934 J12934 merged commit 3436623 into main Mar 6, 2025
54 checks passed
@J12934 J12934 deleted the bugfix/invalid-scheduledscan-name branch March 6, 2025 13:17
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Reviewer Approved to Done in secureCodeBox Mar 6, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

Archived in project

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Invalid Scheduled Scan name

4 participants

0