-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.9k
🔒 🤖 CI Update lock files for main CI build(s) 🔒 🤖 #31429
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
🔒 🤖 CI Update lock files for main CI build(s) 🔒 🤖 #31429
Conversation
341b1a7
to
d6a3d2a
Compare
For the record, there is a single test failure happening in
> assert_allclose(ridge.coef_, svd_ridge.coef_, atol=1e-3, rtol=1e-3)
...
E AssertionError:
E Not equal to tolerance rtol=0.001, atol=0.001
E
E Mismatched elements: 1 / 30 (3.33%)
E Max absolute difference among violations: 0.00572298
E Max relative difference among violations: 0.0024261 The tolerance levels are already quite high for the float32 parametrization of the test, but the violations are barely 2.5x the tolerance level. |
This might be caused by the cython-3.1.0 to cython-3.1.1 upgrade. The other bumps seem unrelated. |
This test fails locally with the "sag" solver if I explore other seeds so it seems to be a seed sensitivity problem. |
Actually, the random state seed is not propagated to the Ridge's |
I pushed an empty commit to confirm that the failure is independent of the Cython update and decouple this PR from the actual fix in #31434. |
Co-authored-by: Lock file bot <noreply@github.com> Co-authored-by: Olivier Grisel <olivier.grisel@ensta.org>
Co-authored-by: Lock file bot <noreply@github.com> Co-authored-by: Olivier Grisel <olivier.grisel@ensta.org>
Co-authored-by: Lock file bot <noreply@github.com> Co-authored-by: Olivier Grisel <olivier.grisel@ensta.org>
Update lock files.
Note
If the CI tasks fail, create a new branch based on this PR and add the required fixes to that branch.