8000 TST np.vstack won't support generator in the future by qinhanmin2014 · Pull Request #12816 · scikit-learn/scikit-learn · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content

TST np.vstack won't support generator in the future #12816

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 18, 2018
Merged

TST np.vstack won't support generator in the future #12816

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 18, 2018

Conversation

qinhanmin2014
Copy link
Member
@qinhanmin2014 qinhanmin2014 commented Dec 18, 2018

Travis cron job failure introduced in #12701
Maybe hurry into 0.20.2 ping @jeremiedbb @jnothman @amueller

8000

@jeremiedbb
Copy link
Member

Sorry I forgot about that :/
It seems that it was slower than stacking after making it a tuple so it's better this way anyway.

LGTM

@qinhanmin2014 qinhanmin2014 mentioned this pull request Dec 18, 2018
@adrinjalali adrinjalali merged commit 5b4cffd into scikit-learn:master Dec 18, 2018
@qinhanmin2014 qinhanmin2014 deleted the pairwise-test branch December 18, 2018 14:51
jnothman pushed a commit to amueller/scikit-learn that referenced this pull request Dec 18, 2018
adrinjalali pushed a commit to adrinjalali/scikit-learn that referenced this pull request Jan 7, 2019
xhluca pushed a commit to xhluca/scikit-learn that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2019
xhluca pushed a commit to xhluca/scikit-learn that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2019
xhluca pushed a commit to xhluca/scikit-learn that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2019
koenvandevelde pushed a commit to koenvandevelde/scikit-learn that referenced this pull request Jul 12, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants
0